Did China yank the central cog of corruption out of the old Obama-era Globalist crime network and install that retread in the White House for 2020 to resume old operations and begin new ones? With a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the realities of the U.S. geopolitical landscape – not those proffered in the MSM – as overlaid by an honest and accurate account of COVID-19 as an undeniable false flag political construct leveraging a real and bioweaponized virus to underpin a pandemic resting entirely on a foundation of propagated fraudulent data, one can determine that there is no other plausible answer to this question than, “yes.”
That’s precisely what China did. The Obama bag man Joe Biden and is now China’s bag man and he’s on point to resume moving money relative to all of the seedy, shady and treasonous deals that has this Republic on the way out and China and the CCP’s brand of totalitarian, communist Marxism on deck.
What about the money, though? How are all of these corrupt, criminal and treasonous Globalists moving the money? I think it’s deeply complex and within a behemoth network that can be simply described as Globalists using private equity deals in the legitimate energy sector as a conduit to illegitimately move money relative to their crimes. Capturing the full scope of this nebulous construct and assembling the evidence cogently to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt is far beyond the scope of reason for a singleton without access to those investigative tools and resources.
THE STATUS QUO
Unfortunately and in a manner that seems to have most Americans oblivious to it and perhaps because public education has failed to inculcate them with the requisite set of independent and critical thinking skills just as it has failed to provide a robust and accurate foundation of civics to which those skills can be applied, this terrifying dynamic goes unseen by most. With no break in the momentum of the status quo, it will be far too late by the time it is realized unless something occurs to upend things positively; like an August Trump reinstatement, as the NY Times is now beginning to report.
This dynamic frighteningly situates the U.S. in the midst of an asymmetrical and undeclared World War III as underpinned by the Chinese infiltration of U.S. institutions writ large and commenced by the launch of a bio-WMD devised to initiate the first strike so as to remove a sitting president, overthrow the U.S. government and install a Chinese proxy in Biden. My shiny nickel rests squarely on the bet of Biden taking a dive in this war.
Quick Sidebar: China is a nightmare of an adversary and they are of the highest order in terms of capabilities and effectiveness – just look around you. In this regard and solely on the merits of maintaining appropriate levels of respect for ones adversaries, I hold China the highest of regards here and tip my hat to them accordingly. I digress.
Like I said – it’s a terrifying dynamic.
Our discussion today is launched by two things but ultimately, it falls back on old work in the vein of future proves past. A recent DOJ press release links us to the old work while a message from one of the individuals in the backdrop of Political Moonshine, who possess a particular and contextually expert skill set that is driven by an unrivaled intellect. The two combine to set our table in private equity and energy.
SETTING THE TABLE
Private equity and energy are not new to our discussion table as I’ve spent untold sums of hours figuratively chasing Joe Biden all over the globe and all relative to what I believe to be crime, corruption, bribery, blackmail, money laundering, kickbacks, etc. Are they using energy to move money? That’s what I think and care to establish.
It also has all of our eggs in the energy sector basket while acknowledging that plenty other baskets exist. In the eyes of a fraud investigator and reverting back to being a 70s-80s, free-range kid and BMX rat (at that age, your rig was your prized and only real valuable possession!), it looks something like this (thanks to Mongoose’s mag wheel).
Statecraft entails all of these treasonous criminals being locked into a sort of playing field and more broadly it’s the geopolitical landscape as it manifests nationally and extends internationally. In a game, there is an arena, a playing surface, players and officials to enforce rules. This analog works well to help explain many vectors including how the energy sector may be (is?) the interface for rampant international fraud, corruption and crime; or so I think.
In our case here, we have the energy sector (arena); finance and private equity (the playing surface); politicians, energy officials and energy finance entities (players); and regulators and law enforcement (officials) to enforce regulations and laws (rules.)
In an organization chart, which is what I roughly outlined above, the energy sector is thrust to the center to become the launch point for investigative work.
This overall dynamic forces the players to play inside of a box that is restrictive with firm boundaries. This box dictates the nature of the engagements inside of it and those leave discoverable but limited evidence behind. Finding it is tedious, arduous and impossible to completely and effectively do without access to the right information and investigative tools, neither of which I (nor any other civilian) have.
At this point, it should be noted that the following broader position on the role of the energy sector was identified and developed while initially examining Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine back around the same time a lot of folks were. My work caused me to believe that the Ukraine matter was not isolated but rather it represented the mapping over of a particular type of construct that was occurring in locations the globe over. That’s how these people operate.
Doing that work, I got suspended from Twitter and later lost (backed-up) some substantial content on Biden and Ukraine when things really began to boil over in the MSM. We take that censorship as confirmation.
Our premise contends that evidence may demonstrate a wide swath of crime and corruption and including but not limited to the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations, the stolen election, the removal of a sitting president, the overthrow of the U.S. government and the installation of a Biden Chinese proxy, all converges into an overarching construct functioning as a continuum. Picture a river flowing in one forceful direction with all of its interlaced tributaries merging, diverging, crossing-over and eventually terminating, but ultimately moving to one end for an explicit purpose.
On this continuum, the energy sector was/is being used as a legitimate conduit to illegitimately move money. Therein, energy partnerships, private equity deals, multilateral cooperation, the contextual merger of national governments and corporations, etc., all serve to facilitate crimes like fraud, money laundering, bribery, blackmail, kickbacks, etc. (think RICO).
As noted, it is important to note that the work here is limited by available open resources and because the broader structure to all of this is immensely burdensome, complex and expansive. Therefore, recapitulating and/or describing a lot of existing work and linking those articles for independent consumption and deeper understanding will be our best option to save space in this otherwise enormous article.
What follows is well short of any level of legal threshold for the evidentiary burden. Rather, the work is better characterized as descriptions of observations against a backdrop of “knowns” to which logical deduction is being applied to formulate positions.
Our wheel analog provides a good means for explaining how the work was conducted. Beginning at the hub of our wheel (energy sector), I ran down many of the spokes (Biden and international co-cospirators) to examine where, how and why those spokes interlaced and terminated at the rim (Globalist network).
BACKDROP TO ENTANGLEMENTS: BIDEN, ENERGY & ENERGY SECURITY
Biden’s wrangling up of the energy sector began under Obama’s first term. This next finding only contributes circumstantially and anecdotally, but it demonstrates the draw back to and direction of Obama/BIden relative to energy. From the Department of Energy (emphasis mine),
“Adam Sieminski was sworn in on June 4, 2012, as the eighth administrator of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). From March 2012 to May 2012, while awaiting confirmation as EIA administrator, Mr. Sieminski served as senior director for energy and environment on the staff of the National Security Council. From 2005 until March 2012, he was the chief energy economist for Deutsche Bank, working with the Bank’s global research and trading units. Drawing on extensive industry, government, and academic sources, Mr. Sieminski forecasted energy market trends and wrote on a variety of topics involving energy economics, climate change, geopolitics, and commodity prices.
From 1998 to 2005, he served as the director and energy strategist for Deutsche Bank’s global oil and gas equity team. Prior to that, from 1988 to 1997, Mr. Sieminski was the senior energy analyst for NatWest Securities in the United States, covering the major U.S. international integrated oil companies.
He also had acted as a senior adviser to the Energy and National Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a nonpartisan policy think tank in Washington, DC. He is a senior fellow and former president of the U.S. Association for Energy Economics, and served as president of the National Association of Petroleum Investment Analysts.
In 2006, Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman appointed Mr. Sieminski to the National Petroleum Council (NPC), an advisory group to the secretary of energy, where he helped author the NPC’s Global Oil and Gas Study: The Hard Truths.
In addition to his affiliation with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, he was also an advisory board member of the Global Energy and Environment Initiative at Johns Hopkins University/SAIS. He had also served as chairman of the Supply-Demand Committee of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, and as an advisory member of the Strategic Energy Task Force of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is a member of the Washington, DC, investment professional society, and holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation. He received both an undergraduate degree in civil engineering and a master’s degree in public administration from Cornell University.
EIA is responsible for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policy-making, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment. EIA provides a wide range of information and data products covering energy production, stocks, demand, imports, exports, and prices. EIA also prepares analyses and special reports on topics of current interest.
How helpful would that guy be if you were looking to exploit the energy sector fraudulently? A laughably rhetorical question.
Examine how the highlighted aspects about Adam Sieminski (formerly at EIA/DOE) directly overlay our work here and in precisely all of the right areas. It even includes ties to John’s Hopkins (COVID-19). He presents as a Deep State fixer but my speculation on him is just informed conjecture. He served from 2012-2017, though, which overlays our precise timeline, so I’d love to see him on the stand because I bet he knows a lot. I also bet there are plenty more just like him.
How about Sieminski’s ties to Deutsche Bank? The same Deutsche Bank that gave up records on Trump last August around the same time that the CDC revised away 94% of it’s bulk mortality and infection data that were used to justify the federal issuance (for state, county and local enforcement [federalism]) of COVID mitigations and guideline? Revisions that left only 6% of the data valid and reverting actual mortality right back to smack dab in the middle of a generally regular flu season? Deflection strategy? Hey, look here, not there!?
Digressing and as Bloomberg reported at the time (emphasis mine),
Deutsche Bank AG handed over detailed records related to dealings with U.S. President Donald Trump’s family business after receiving a subpoena from prosecutors last year, the New York Times reported.
The subpoena demanded documents that Trump and the Trump Organization had provided to the lender, the newspaper reported, citing four people familiar with the matter. The German firm complied, turning over records including financial statements and other materials it had received as Trump sought loans, the paper said.
It’s part of an investigation by New York prosecutors into the president’s business affairs, the paper said. The lender has worked with Trump for two decades, providing him and his company with more than $2 billion in loans, the Times reported.
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. suggested in a court filing earlier this week that his office may be investigating potential bank and insurance fraud by the Trump Organization. He asked a federal judge on Monday to throw out the president’s latest effort to block a subpoena for documents from his accounting firm, Mazars USA LLP.
Spokespeople for Deutsche Bank and Vance’s office declined to comment on the reported subpoena when contacted by Bloomberg. A representative for the Trump Organization didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.
More on Deutsche Bank from CNN Business (emphasis mine),
New York (CNN Business) The private bankers responsible for lending to President Donald Trump and Jared Kushner have resigned from Deutsche Bank, the bank said.
“Rosemary Vrablic and Dominic Scalzi have tendered their resignations to Deutsche Bank effective as of year-end, which was accepted by the bank,” Daniel Hunter, a spokesman for the bank said in a statement.
Vrablic and Scalzi have worked closely together for years since joining Deutsche Bank a decade ago. Vrablic was a trusted contact to the Trump Organization and Kushner and assumed the bank’s lending relationship with Trump in the private side of the bank after the commercial lending division stopped doing business with Trump.
Deutsche Bank (DB) has loaned the Trump Organization more than $300 million.
It’s as much political projection (fraud?) as it is the usual bullshit from the usual suspects.
It gets worse for Deutsche Bank, though. Consider this which is extracted from my previous work,
“What is reasonably thought to have been a professional hit has occurred targeting federal Judge Esther Salas, who was just appointed to the Epstein/Deutsche Bank case two days before. Tragically, it resulted in the wounding of the judge’s husband, Mark Anderl, and the killing the couple’s 20-year-old son, Daniel Anderl.
This example is a mere sip from an ocean of evidence and representative of the breadth, depth and complexity I offer warning about in all of this. It only continues to get more complex; way more complex.
For more context going forward, this an extract from the article referenced below, that is pretext which Joe Biden established on 22 Nov 14 at the Atlantic Council Energy and Economic Summit in Istanbul.
There he said (emphasis mine,)
“First is a new development, the use of corruption and oligarchy-kleptocracy as a tool of international coercion (interesting word choice, Joe.) Second, is use of energy as a weapon, undermining the security of nations. Global energy security is a vital part of America’s national security. In East Asia, President Obama and President Xi just signed a historic agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the United States has launched an initiative to double the access to electric power. We call is Power Africa. And in the Caribbean and Central America, our administration has launched a new, regional energy strategy to help boost sustainable economic growth and diversity of energy sources. (Look out for Haiti/Carribean and Africa below – I tie them back, too.)
Note the nexus between Presidents Xi and Obama relative to the context of using energy as a “weapon.” Note how energy overlaps locations that bear down in other story lines like human sex trafficking and vaccination research.
Note reference to global energy security because it’s critical. We know what happens when these people change the rules or rewrite them.
What about the referenced overlap to vaccination research angles? Yes, the Bidens were caught between COVID-19, vaccination development, energy and China. I wrote an article on it entitled ‘CONVERGING LANDSCAPES: HOW THE BIDEN FAMILY FINDS ITSELF BETWEEN ENERGY CORRUPTION AND ANTI-MALARIA VACCINATION PROGRAMS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC‘, that ties back to our energy sector theory origins.
What about Biden running point on energy for Obama? There is nothing I could find in the way of a formal appointment of then Vice President Biden to an energy-specific post by Obama, but the Obama White House archives includes these as extracted directly from Biden’s page (emphasis mine) and note again the similar overlaps to other areas of interest; especially geographically,
Launched the Caribbean Energy Security Initiative in January 2015 and chaired the U.S.-Caribbean-Central America Summit in May 2016, which advanced the diversification and integration of the region’s energy sectors.
The Vice President has been a leading architect of the U.S. strategic vision of a Europe whole, free and at peace. During his time in the Senate, the Vice President led the effort to enlarge NATO to include the former Warsaw Pact countries of Eastern and Central Europe after the collapse of the Iron Curtain. The Vice President’s speech at the Munich Security Conference in February 2015 laid out a vision for how to revitalize NATO, strengthen democratic institutions in Europe, prioritize investments to bolster energy security, and grow trade and investment ties across the Atlantic. The Vice President has been leading the Administration’s effort to support a sovereign, democratic Ukraine, visiting the country three times in 2014.
Led U.S. efforts to focus on increasing European energy diversification and security.
Engaged regularly with King Abdullah to sustain our vital strategic partnership with Jordan and promote counterterrorism and energy cooperation with regional partners.
Even on then the Vice President’s own page, these statements were made,
“The Vice President’s speech at the Munich Security Conference in February 2015 laid out a vision for how to revitalize NATO, strengthen democratic institutions in Europe, prioritize investments to bolster energy security, and grow trade and investment ties across the Atlantic. The Vice President has been leading the administration’s effort to support a sovereign, democratic Ukraine, visiting the country three times in 2014. ”
Note how this ties contemporaneously to the current narrative to push Ukraine to join NATO as another incursion on Russia’s regional security and national sovereignty and note the context of SECURITY; and remember, these people are playing in a box – energy – and now ENERGY SECURITY is bearing down. I described it this way previously,
Let’s also not forget that China is leveraging these programs in part to infiltrate NATO, as outlined by the Lithuanians, and that the current drive from the Obama/Biden/Deep State is rekindling trouble (a coup under Obama/Clinton/Kerry) in Ukraine and pushing it to join NATO relative to NATO’s continued encircling of and pressure campaign on Russia (previously covered in Volume 8 of The Still.)
More from Biden on ENERGY SECURITY in the earlier article,
This is about energy security. To achieve it, Europe needs to ensure it diversifies its resources, its routes and its suppliers.”
More from my article, this hits on a monumentally critical component to understand, which I began emphasizing above – ENERGY SECURITY.
Overlaying our timeline on a 2014-2016 span, Obama leveraged a false flag construct and other means to rewrite U.S. SECURITY in another very important area – biosecurity rules. These changes preceded and permitted the export of gain of function research, which was being exposed by internal U.S. whistleblowers. The export destination was the Wuhan Lab of Virology in China. China/CCP/PLA was then aided with samples, proprietary knowledge and funding from Fauci’s NIH and elsewhere and specific to SARS-CoV-2.
So then, why did Biden arrange to place his hands on ENERGY SECURITY and in the precise locations where we are documenting all of this crime, corruption, fraud and treason; and where the locations for other sorts of documented and related crimes like human trafficking, possible vaccination research, etc. overlap?
What happens when these people change the rules? Rhetorical questions.
Returning to the thrust of the article and starting with the message from my guy, we can see that he’s telling us that, for someone (can’t imagine Merrick Garland’s DOJ/FBI has an interest) with the requisite investigative resources, the evidence exists inside of private equity deals.
He also reminds us that Peter Schweitzer’s book ‘Secret Empires’ (I’ve yet to read it) lays a granular foundation for our quote here, which has been reproduced from the message and augmented to polish it up a bit for the article; but not in ways to change the content or meaning.
Bribery: Prime equity funds typically charge 2% of the assets under management and 20% of the profits when a deal is sold. They (Bidens) ran $1.5 billion deal (an energy deal with China, the CCP and the CEFC). There were 3 partners: Whitey Bulger’s nephew (James Bulger), John Kerry’s step son (Chris Heinz) and Hunter (Biden.) The 2% is annual.
Blackmail: I searched for the photos (derived from Biden’s controversial laptop) of Hunter with under age Chinese kids – and there were some horrifying ones – and they have since been scrubbed from the search engines – Bing, Google and even Duck Duck Go. There was one of him pressed up against kid that was no more than 12 years old and she was wearing fishnets and long pressed on fingernails. Can’t find any of them anywhere.
The Victim: It was a selfie he (Hunter) took (of the victim described above.) She was pressed between Hunter and what looked like a stripper pole. Her face had a look of absolute terror.
With quite a bit alleged in that quote, let’s focus on the empirical bits and for good reason.
Before we do, recall what it is we’re actually discussing and for the sake of clarity in the dialogue, we’ll consider some older work. First, let’s throw-down an empirical data point to demonstrate that we are justified in even having this dialogue.
It’s this simple. In 2016 and upon exiting office (VPOTUS), Joe (and Jill) Biden’s income was $396,456.
For 2017-2019 and aligning on the same timeline as the deliberate release of a bio-WMD in Wuhan China; and dating back to October 2019 (as per the FBI); and as being first reported in the MSM on 27 Dec 19; the Biden’s income exploded exponentially to $16, 596,979.
Overall, that represents a 4086.34% increase in income for those 3 years combined; equating to an average annual increase in income of $5,532,326.33 at 1295.45%.
That change is what we call a hockey stick line statistically and it is a hallmark indicator of fraud, just like these hockey sticks were.
Where did that money come from? Private equity? Yes.
Suffice it say that we have $16 million dollars worth of room to make our assertions begin to stick within $1.5 billion dollar box. That’s a lot of room.
This is where the $1.5 billion dollar deal bears down greatest. The one that Hunter brokered with China/CCP/PLA/CEFC (the latter being a CCP energy company) after “THE BIG GUY” chauffeured him across the pond on Air Force 2; where upon landing, they split ways. Days later when they re-boarded AF2, the deal was in Hunter’s pocket right next to is crack pipe and his selfie-porn-generating device.
For shits, giggles and satisfaction, you can even take our timeline back to 05 Jan 17 and the Susan Rice memo; and even long before that; as in back to the 1960s and arguably, that’s not even the very beginning of it all.
It’s as simple as this – did this absurd increase in the Biden’s annual income flow into their accounts through energy sector and for the reasons I’ve outlined?
It’s time to follow the money and to begin that murky, convoluted and banal process, we’ll introduce the second point from above and it’s the DOJ press release, which I remarked on the other day.
Importantly, I think the easiest way to bring all of this together is to start with this most recent DOJ press release, show you what grabbed my my attention, draw it back appropriately and then walk you backwards through it all while linking you to the accompanying research along the way.
THE DOJ PRESS RELEASE
This introduces it.
The red flags in that were fairly obvious: money laundering, U.S. financial system, bribery, Brazil, world governments, global construction (think looming U.S. infrastructure bill and how infrastructure overlaps energy in so many places; each being a potential portal for fraud; and if you know anything about the construction industry…). All of that caught my attention.
Pay special attention to the concept of laundering money inside of the U.S. financial system because it comes to bear in light of two things: 1) someone would be needed to steer corruption through the U.S. system – was it Biden? and 2) closed and coveted financial systems require getting access to them (in other nations), which is accomplished by engaging with the political leaders in those countries.
What was contained in that press release that that really made me stand-up, though, was Odebrecht and here’s why.
Odebrecht backs us up to a 26 Nov 19 article examining Biden relative to Ukraine. It was a build on work from the previous day that had identified a circular flow of money I characterized as: Obama/Biden <> Ukraine/Iran <>Iran/Ukraine <> Biden Obama. Ukraine and Iran factor in heavily in the research vectors and that work delivered Brazil and a bunch of other nations of which there are presumably more to identify.
We fall even further back on a 29-31 May 13 timeline where, in Brazil, Biden called for the “start of a new era of U.S.-Brazilian relations,” and of course energy is specifically central to it. You can consider that the launch point to a new era of crime and corruption to be contained within the rewrite for the “new era.”
Biden then stated (emphasis mine),
“On energy, we discussed how we can build a partnership that reflects the ambition of both our countries in this area. As some of you know, two days ago, I spent time at your state-owned, and actually now private and state enterprise, going through a deep briefing on the promise of pre-salt oil that is immense. The find is immense.”
Did you catch the reference to a “state-owned” energy firm? As in Brazil being the state, Biden partnering with the leaders of Brazil and specifically as it relates to energy and more specifically as it relates to a corrupt company that has an established history of corruption with politicians?
Grab a hold of “state-owned” because it will bear down as a constant much like biosecurity and energy security.
While Biden was in Brazil, he met with Petrobras.
What do we know about Petrobras? It’s an energy company owned by Odebrecht SA, our notoriously corrupt entity and whose CEO was arrested for corruption in 2015.
Consider that Odebrecht was charged in July with corruption and money laundering and declined to respond to specific questions about the price fixing and political kickback case focused on state-run oil firm Petroleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras.
It gets worse. Consider the political element alone (emphasis mine), “Among dozens of executives under investigation for overcharging Petrobras on contracts and using the excess to bribe politicians, Odebrecht had an especially close relationship to former President Lula.“
By 18 Jun 19, Odebrecht had filed bankruptcy. Doesn’t this all coincide with the same relative time-frame as Hunter Biden’s departure from Burisma?
“Odebrecht and petrochemical company Braskem SA in 2016 struck parallel agreements with authorities in three countries to pay up to $4.5 billion, as part of the largest anticorruption settlement in history. Braskem is partly owned by Odebrecht and Petrobras.
The settlements with U.S., Brazilian and Swiss authorities spawned corruption probes in other Latin American countries where the two companies operate. Last month, Odebrecht filed for chapter 15 bankruptcy in the U.S. shortly after it filed for bankruptcy in Brazil in June.”
On 20 Nov 19, the DOJ issued a press release stating (emphasis mine),
“An indictment was unsealed today in federal court in Brooklyn charging Jose Carlos Grubisich, the former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Braskem S.A. (Braskem), a publicly traded Brazil-based petrochemical company, for his role in a massive bribery and money laundering scheme involving Braskem and its parent company, Odebrecht S.A. (Odebrecht). The scheme allegedly resulted in the diversion of hundreds of millions of dollars from Braskem to a secret slush fund used, in part, to pay bribes to government officials, political parties and others in Brazil to obtain and retain business. Grubisich, who also served as a member of the Board of Directors of Braskem, and in various capacities for Odebrecht, was charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), one count of conspiracy to violate the books and records provisions of the FCPA and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.”
Odebrecht, right? Understanding why I stood-up to the latest release from the DOJ?
According to the Brazil Business Council, BUSBC member companies, which includes Braskem, were present when Biden made his speech in Brazil. As stated, Braskem’s parent company is, Odebrecht. Braskem happens also to be the US’s largest domestic producer of polypropylene.
That places the corrupt parent company, by proxy vis-à-vis Braskem, in proximity of Biden at the time of his speech.
Joe Biden himself is the central cog of corruption linking the nations we’re mentioning here because on varying levels, he engaging with them all in the context of energy. Even so, some of the nations have their own bilateral arrangements and otherwise. We could easily take Biden’s spoke in our wheel diagram, make it a hub and build a wheel around him (actually, that’s what we’re doing in this article.)
FOLLOW THE MONEY
Let’s follow the money. Moving forward from the Ukraine, Iran, Brazil tangent used to establish the basis of our discussion to introduce the energy sector as a legitimate conduit to illegitimately move money, we arrive at a substantial article outlining Biden’s crimes. We focus our attention on the 2013 Hunter/China/CCP/PLA/CEFC $1.5 billion dollar deal in private equity and we do this with our stronger understanding of the energy sector conduit.
The CEFC China Energy Company, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2020, was a CCP owned and controlled energy company just much like Petrobras in Brazil. Remember, these criminals map the same constructs and schemes over different areas to commit the same crimes.
Patrick Ho, who is a Chinese Deep State asset, will bear down as the nexus between the CEFC, it’s chairman Ye Jianming, where Hunter Biden entered an agreement to serve as an “attorney.” Although Biden graduated from Yale Law School in 1996, he has no qualifications in energy.
These are extracts and images from previous work that help paint the picture.
More evidence of the Biden China deal emerged including these, which outlined previous revelations that the Bidens were charging fees of $10 million just for introductions to then Vice President Joe Biden.
This document above is notable due to its draw back on the CEFC, which factors-in the recently emerged Patrick Ho as cooperating with Rudy Giuliani in the Biden matters and at the behest of then President Trump.
In a leaked conversation, Hunter Biden describes Ye as “his partner” characterizing him as the richest man in the world and chairman of the CEFC, a private Chinese outfit to mysteriously appear in the Global Fortune 500 beginning in 2013. Here, it’s important to reflect back on what former Biden associate Tony Bobulinski recently stated and namely that the CCP serves as China’s political arm while the CEFC serves as its capitalist arm.
In other words, Hunter Biden’s $1.5 billion private equity deal is with the CCP’s capitalist arm.
It’s President Xi Jinping’s alignment with China’s “One Belt One Road” geopolitical and infrastructure development directive, which invests in foreign nations, that leverages the CCP political arm and CEFC economic arm and remember, I recently identified infrastructure as the means by which China intends to leverage its proxy to apply Chinese doctrine to America using the looming U.S. infrastructure bill.
It ties directly to One Belt One Road and half of that is energy – CEFC, the capitalist arm of the CCP.
The leaked conversation showed how it’s important to acknowledge the two the primary players in the CEFC – Chairman Ye Jianming, with whom Hunter Biden entered into an agreement to serve as his “personal attorney” and who he calls his “partner” in the deal; and Patrick Ho, who was, “the fucking spy chief of China,” as Hunter described him, and the individual responsible for founding the CEFC.
Curiously but not surprisingly, Biden and Ye only communicate in person. There are reasons for that and one of them is that the play inside of a box.
As this timeline moves forward, Ho had relatively recently disappeared; having been arrested and charged in the U.S.; only to reemerge as a cooperating witness in Rudy Giulani’s effort to expose The Biden Crime Family. Also, Ye was arrested by the CCP in March 2018. We can view Ye’s arrest as the CCP enveloping him to control the fall-out and damage for what I’m outlining here and more.
The leaked conversation also contains Hunter stating his concerns over Ye’s undetermined location relevant to a “$4 billion deal” to “build the fucking largest fucking LNG port (liquified natural gas) in the world.” Once again, there’s another natural gas point as referenced way back at the beginning.
Recapitulating the nature of the deal as succinctly as we can, we see that Hunter Biden was representing Ye, the CEFC chairman, as his personal attorney. On the weekend of 04 July 17, former CEFC director Zang Jian Jun and Xi met in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin and specifically discussed the purchase of one of the largest oil conglomerates in the world, the Russian corporation Rosneft. Hold on to Rosneft.
The deal being discussed was the purchase of a 14% share and Hunter put a $4 billion price tag on it. This deal is derived from the 2013 $1.5 billion Hunter deal and in it, Joe Biden, was represented by his son Hunter Biden in an arrangement where funding was earmarked for Joe in percentages and whereby he was compelling Hunter to forfeit to him half his salary in acting as the family bag man.
A state-owned Russian global oil conglomerate was being purchased and at this particular time, Russia was under Obama-imposed sanctions for it’s actions relative to the Ukraine and Russia’s capture of the Crimean Peninsula, which is home to its prized Black Sea Fleet (naval) in Sevastopol.
According to Bobulinski, $10 million dollars had been earmarked by CEFC to capitalize Sinohawk. Oneida Holdings was the shell firm designated to receive the funding, which never arrived and without any notice. From Bobulinski’s statement, he described it like this.
“I am the CEO of Sinohawk Holdings which was a partnership between the Chinese operating through CEFC/Chairman Ye and the Biden family. I was brought into the company to be the CEO by James Gilliar and Hunter Biden. The reference to “the Big Guy” in the much publicized May 13, 2017 email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden. The other “JB” referenced in that email is Jim Biden, Joe’s brother.”
Bobulinski gave special attention in his interview to delineate two tranches of $5 million funding each and he did so carefully. One tranche was earmarked for capitalization while the second was earmarked as a personal loan to the Biden family – A PERSONAL LOAN TO THE BIDEN FAMILY.
Returning to Rosneft from several paragraphs up, now consider this from the USA Today as we begin to drag-in familiar names that add to the complexity (emphasis mine),
The most troubling issue that (Christopher) Wray may face is the fact that his law firm — King & Spalding — represents Rosneft and Gazprom, two of Russia’s largest state-controlled oil companies.
Rosneft was prominently mentioned in the now infamous 35-page dossier prepared by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele. The dossier claims that the CEO of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, offered candidate Donald Trump, through Trump’s campaign advisor Carter Page, a 19% stake in the company in exchange for lifting U.S. sanctions on Russia. The dossier claims that the offer was made in July while Page was in Moscow.
Rosneft is also the company that had a $500 billion oil drilling joint-venture with Exxon in 2012, when Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was Exxon’s CEO. However, the deal was nixed by President Obama in 2014, when he imposed the sanctions that crippled Russia’s ability to do business with U.S. companies. The lifting of sanctions by the Trump administration would enable Exxon to renew its joint venture agreement with Rosneft, and the law firm of King & Spalding could end up in the middle of the contract negotiations between those two companies.
The law firm’s representation of Gazprom raises even more serious conflict issues for Wray. Gazprom was a partner in RosUkrEnergo AG (“RUE”), which is controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Dmitry Firtash. He is under federal indictment in Chicago for racketeering charges, has had numerous financial dealings with former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, and is generally considered to be a member of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.
Rosneft delivers Obama, sanctions, Ukraine, Paul Manafort, Russia, Putin, Exxon, former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, an enmeshed Christopher Wray, King & Spalding, Gazprom, the U.K., MI6, Christopher Steele, the Steele Dossier, Carter Page, FISA warrants, Donald Trump, an alleged bribe in private equity in the energy sector.
What are the chances we can link all of this William Barr and the stolen election while threading it through California politicians and directly back to China? Is it 100%? Yes it its.
Watch what happens.
Let’s tug on another state-owned energy company enmeshed with the Bidens. This is from another article and it references a DOJ press release from November 2020.
On Wednesday, the Department of Justice issued a press release that we began taking to task in the previous article, which is necessary backdrop for what follows. From that article, here’s a brief recapitulation of what the DOJ outlined.
According to the DOJ press release (emphasis added),
Natalino D’Amato, 61, of Venezuela, was charged in an 11-count indictment filed in the Southern District of Florida. D’Amato was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, four counts of international money laundering, three counts of promotional money laundering, and three counts of engaging in transactions involving criminally derived property.
The indictment alleges that, beginning in January 2013 and continuing through December 2017, D’Amato conspired with others, including officials at joint ventures between PDVSA and various foreign companies in the oil-rich Orinoco belt of Venezuela, to launder the proceeds of an illegal bribery scheme to and from bank accounts located in South Florida. These joint ventures were majority owned and controlled by PDVSA. According to the indictment, D’Amato offered and paid bribes to numerous Venezuelan officials who worked at the PDVSA joint ventures in order to obtain highly inflated and lucrative contracts to provide goods and services to the PDVSA joint ventures. The indictment further alleges that over the course of the conspiracy, companies controlled by D’Amato received approximately $160 million from the PDVSA joint ventures into accounts he controlled in South Florida. According to the charges, D’Amato used a portion of those funds to make payments to or for the benefit of the Venezuelan officials.
Notably and importantly, this ties us back to the DOJ press release underpinning our discussion here and specifically, fraud and money laundering through Odebrecht and in the U.S. financial system, ergo Florida.
I warned you early that this was burdensome and complex and most importantly, incomplete by far.
We immediately grab on to the nature of the crimes and Venezuela and PDVSA, Venezuela’s “state-owned” energy company.
Doing so has falling back on old work,
The first order of business is finding entities resting in between the Bidens and those associated with the press release: Natalino D’Amato, Venezuela, South Florida and PDVSA.
To demonstrate the complexity here, consider the two primary corporations that link to the Biden crime family – Rosemont Seneca and Boahai Harvest. Bohai Harvest alone has 680 offshore entities, 101 officers, 12 intermediaries and 35 global locations that span Hong Kong, Luxembourg, Singapore, Jersey, Switzerland Guernsey, UK, Isle of Man, China, Panama, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Malta, Seychelles, Bahamas, and more.
Here is one example from Bohai Harvest’s 12 intermediaries that serves as an exemplar of how this all peels back like an onion and whereby each layer diverges like a spiderweb. In this case, Grand Harvest Consultants LTD depicts how each of the Bohai Harvest entities generates this type of hub and spoke map.
This type of hub and spoke map can be generated for each of the remaining 11 Bohai Harvest intermediaries and each of its 680 offshore entities and the 101 officers. For each of those, which totals 793 altogether, a hub and spoke map would be generated and each spoke would be run to its end point, which in turn would create another hub and spoke map. Rinse/repeat. You could do this for a very long time.
All of this would represent the tip of the iceberg and as you can see, it is a daunting task and so we stay cursory in our examination.
Thorough efforts to tie D’Amato directly to Biden were fruitless, as expected, and so it made sense to vector from known Biden interfaces: Bohai Harvest and Rosemont Seneca.
Starting there and vectoring back towards Venezuela, our focus naturally drew upon PDVSA (we assert that the Biden’s were leveraging energy markets and natural gas, specifically, to move money relative to their criminal enterprises) and PDVSA is state-owned [Venezuela], has Russian entanglements and ties to Dominion/Smartmatic by it’s state ownership [Venezuela.]
After several hours of work, the best laid evidence can be found in work that brings PDVSA to light relative to an established and known entity is Rosneft – Russia’s largest oil producer.
The entanglements are remarkable, no? They include Bohai Harvest, Rosemont Seneca, Venezuela, PDVSA, Russia, Dominion/Smartmatic and Rosneft.
Let’s pause, breathe for a moment and then give due diligence to a direct reference above that draws us back to specific names and entities introduced at the beginning.
Remember this from the message? “There were 3 partners: Whitey Bulger’s nephew (James Bulger), John Kerry’s step son (Chris Heinz) and Hunter (Biden.)”
Here’s the due diligence drawing us back on the Bidens, China, energy and private equity.
In 2013, two Chinese-registered asset managers (Bohai Industrial Investment Fund and Harvest Fund Management) founded BHR with two U.S. enties (Thornton Group LLC and Rosemont Seneca Partners.) The Chinese registered asset managers are Bohai Industrial Investment Fund Management as backed by BOC International Holdings and Harvest Fund Management as back by none other than Deutsche Bank (another draw-back).
Thornton Group was co- founded by James Bulger and Rosemont Seneca was founded by Devon Archer, Christopher Heinz, and Hunter Biden. A memorandum of understanding was signed to create the fund named BHR Partners, which was followed by the signing of contracts.
Picking back up and continuing from the same,
This is Rosneft.
Rosneft should sound familiar to you and we’re moving in that direction. What connects us to Rosneft is Hunter Biden (Joe Biden), China, the CCP, Patrick Ho and his entity, CEFC, which we first brought to your attention in March. The takeaway here to keep things succinct is viewing CEFC as the linkage between the Bidens and China ergo we draw down on how PDVSA may link to CEFC/China.
The following two extracts represent a tapestry of nexuses outlined in the source article that deeply enmesh Venezuela and PDVSA in all of this and ultimately right back to the Bidens and China.
06 Nov 19: Geopolitical Monitor reported in October 2019 that “Russian media suggested that Russian energy conglomerate Rosneft has plans to consolidate Venezuela’s National Oil Company PDVSA (Petroleos de Venezuela) under Rosneft’s corporate structure in exchange for debt relief. This would seem to keep U.S., Canadian, and Mexican oil and natural gas firms from satisfying natural gas demand from non-OECD Asia. Additionally, it allows Moscow to use Rosneft’s acquisition of Venezuelan natural gas as a geopolitical coercion tool by acquiring a piece of some of the largest recoverable oil and natural gas reserves in the world. The Maduro regime will also need to navigate the $20-$60 billion in debt owed to China. Will the Chinese also have a stake in PDVSA? If so, how does that play into the current US-China trade negotiations? What these geopolitical decisions point to is a Rosneft-PDVSA merger that brings more questions than answers. Military troops and hardware were used to save the Assad regime, and now in Venezuela it will be oil, natural gas, and petrochemicals that gives Russia a solid foothold in the western hemisphere. PDVSA is one of the world’s most prolific oil companies with the largest extractable oil and gas reserves in the world – estimated at 300 billion barrels, and PDVSA’s estimated worth is “approximately $186 billion.”
08 Dec 19: World Oil reports that a “subsidiary of Rosneft has taken over some contract discussions with local service providers in Venezuela, stepping in for PDVSA on joint projects with the state-owned oil company, according to people familiar with the matter; representing a major turnabout for PDVSA, which in the past typically operated all aspects of the joint ventures, said the people, who asked not to be named because the talks with the service providers aren’t public. Rosneft now trades much of Venezuela’s oil from an office in Panama staffed with former PDVSA employees. Rosneft receives oil as part of its joint ventures with PDVSA, and also as repayment for loans. It’s not subject to U.S. sanctions that restrict American refiners from importing Venezuelan crude.”
Moving on and relaunching from Venezuela with the idea that its state-owned energy company PDVSA may be a conduit to move money in the broader overarching construct, how else does the nation tie-in directly? Dominion-Smartmatic and the stolen 2020 election is the easy answer.
In addition to having funded the stolen election alongside China and Cuba and as per Sidney Powell, Venezuela was draws back on Hammer and Scorecard as interface for Dominion Smartmatic relative to stealing elections. This occurred in the contexts of both initial ownership and the utilization thereof so as to us guarantee “elections” for the Maduro regime.
This is from Powell’s Georgia filing.
Consider this from previous work and note the obvious tie backs,
Consider this from the Financial Times and take note of the countries named relative to the ones already outlined while also recognizing Mr. Trump’s primary motivation.
Here is a look at what prompted the US action, what it could mean for Venezuela and how Russia has reacted. Why has the US imposed sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil company, Rosneft? The Trump administration wants to force Mr. Maduro to step down and agree to fresh elections, as it considers his 2018 election victory fraudulent. Venezuela’s once wealthy economy has collapsed over the past four years, with GDP shrinking by more than two-thirds, but Mr Maduro has so far clung to power with the support of his key allies: Russia, Cuba, Turkey and China.
Venezuela and PDVSA are in – lock, stock and barrel.
We’ve already dragged-in Wray without sharing most of his background and that long article also enmeshes former Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, Mueller and others; so now watch me enmesh former Attorney General William Barr as deeply as it gets.
Did you know this about Barr? In 1974 he received his MA in government and Chinese Studies. Between 1973-1977, he served in the Central Intelligence agency. In 1990 he was Deputy AG to George H.W. Bush before becoming his AG. He has roots. Deep and specific roots and this is only a glimpse of his backdrop.
Most critically, Barr served law firm Kirkland & Ellis at a very specific time. Consider this from old work,
The last article focused on the timing and placement of Attorney General William Barr as it relates to Dominion Voting Systems, which is obviously at the heart of this stolen 2020 election. Therein, we discussed how the enigmatic Mr. Barr, after having served as AG previously when appointed by by George H.W. Bush, had returned to the private sector after he left the DOJ. I outlined his background in the All Holds Barred article wherein we learned that Barr had returned to work at Kirkland & Ellis in 2017.
It’s Kirkland & Ellis that binds Barr to Dominion Voting Systems as the firm guided its acquisition by Staple Street Capital during the time Barr was working at Kirkland & Ellis and before he left the firm to return to the DOJ for a second stint as AG and at the behest of President Donald J. Trump.
In order to do this and perhaps for fun, we must drag James Comey into this. Before entering the FBI, Comey was a known Clinton fixer and in 2013 was appointed .
On 30 Jan 13, Comey was appointed Director of HSBC Holdings effective 04 Mar 13. This overlaps Comey’s appointment as FBI Director spanning 04 Sep 13 to 09 May 17.
Now consider this from old work,
Staple Street Capital, which had acquired Dominion in 2018 and whereby AG William Barr had been positioned at Kirkland & Ellis, the law firm advising Staple Street on the acquisition. It’s also important to note here that HSBC Toronto managed to secure 18 different Dominion patents that represent the technical and functional capacity to effectively penetrate and manipulate US elections by means of Dominion/Smartmatic systems and software. HSBC is Chinese-owned ergo China bought those patents.
More old work to complete the picture,
The following work is from BillLawrenceOnline and it completes this picture for us so I’m relying on it entirely. Picking back up with Staple Street we take a short journey straight to China. Here’s what we learn.
Oh, what a tangled web we weave.
Remember, HSBC is a Chinese bank and a functionary of the capitalist arm of the CCP. The capitalist arm of the CCP is the CEFC and the CEFC is ENERGY.
So you tell me. Half of the Chinese One Belt One Road doctrine is energy; Biden the Chinese proxy is enmeshed in energy corruption the globe over; and the primary source of the energy corruption is China. Given the slice of pie – that’s right, a mere slice – we devoured here, is there any other way to see it? Not for my nickel.
I don’t think there is any question that the energy sector is being used to move money relative to the overarching criminal and treasonous construct. There’s also no question that I don’t have the time or resources to prove it.
Somebody can, though. After all, private equity deals that entail prime equity funds typically charge 2% of the assets under management and 20% of the profits when a deal is sold. These people are playing in boxes and inside of them; for the properly equipped investigator, is that evidence.
Can we make that evidence work? Yes, and we have $16 million worth of room inside a 1.5 billion dollar box.