13 SEP 20 (FIFTY-SECOND article in a series) Is there an end to it? An end to this living hell pushing the boundaries of sanity? Are there any good men and women left in this world who have both the intestinal fortitude and the authority to step forward and simply say, "No more and never again!" and then proceed to gut the entire thing by spilling its bowels into the streets of D.C. for all of the world to observe in pure and full sunlight? That is to say, declassify it all; indict them all; apply the full force of the law to them all; arrest them all; publicly and purposefully perp-walk them all; and make ALL OF IT for ALL OF US to see. Every last granular detail.
31 AUG 20 (FORTY-SEVENTH article in a series) Understanding whether or not there is are profound levels of corruption; perhaps treason, plaguing the U.S. Senate, which intensely manifested in reaction to the 2016 election of Donald J. Trump, requires us to frame it against our understanding of the historic corruption and criminality emanating from Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) U.S. House of Representatives. The clearly orchestrated and severely hyper-partisan politics underpinning the geopolitical landscape; the contemporaneous fervor of which is unprecedented in U.S. history, gave way to a rogue House that impeached a president out of thin air, aided and abetted a viral pandemic and silently endorsed the toppling of historic statues while their brown shirt foot soldiers burn our cities and attack our fellow citizens.
10 JUN 20 (FORTIETH article in a series) Mr. Trump’s only option is to ensure that the last cut federalism makes is a fatal one targeting the appropriate entities where resistant states and locales are intentionally standing down. Mr. Trump must therefore carefully navigate forward before selecting a politically and strategically perfect time to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 and deploy requisite military assets on an as-needed basis. Military jurisdiction and its gravity and precision are the only way to return the Republic to the people.
In the aftermath of the leaked Seely letter and respective to the Iran/Iraq embassy construct and the developing story of National Security Council senior director for European and Russian affairs, Andrew Peek, being placed on leave, does Sundance's work identify said leaker? It's not explicitly stated but it's plausible.
The level of DSSG maneuvering in the metastasizing matter that is foreign policy and diplomacy with Iran, which takes the form of using an old fax line number and the nation of Switzerland as a back channel diplomatic conduit, is an entanglement of affairs getting more and more difficult to track. That is by design. That is how these constructs function.
Yesterday, I wrote a piece suggesting that the President would have to give due diligence to filtering further Iranian aggression by examining such instances through the lens of the 'false flag.' Today, we have the DOD and Secretary Esper demarcating a clear line for Iran by stating that the US would not tolerate ANY further aggression from Iran or its proxy forces. I wrote about the dynamics of such a scenario in yesterday's piece.
This is by no means a deep dig on the foreign policy and military scenarios facing the President with Iran, Iraq and the Middle East in general. In fact, I've been holding off on writing something like this despite my immediate reaction and speculation. Rather, this is an acknowledgement of the actual forces and opportunities this construct creates for others (DSSG/MIC/President's enemies) to either manipulate the administration towards ulterior objectives and/or to goad the President into taking action for the same express purpose - achieving ulterior objectives that are assuredly unknown to him.
As the developments with Iran unfolded last night, I paused to comment on political strategy that could serve President Trump very well; especially as it relates to his adversaries. I suggested that the strategy might allow the President to emerge in a position of significant leverage over the DSSG/MIC and whereby he could reasonably shut down several fronts on which the DSSG/MIC are waging political warfare.
We'll just play this card immediately - the DOD's claimed inadvertent publication of the Seely letter was not "an honest mistake." Also, the word "suspected" is being removed from further discussion.
Yesterday, I outlined a painstakingly thorough but incomplete body of evidence suggesting that the President may have been in the middle of a calculated Iraq exit strategy that would allow him to keep the DSSG/MIC in check by honoring the sovereignty of Iraq on the world's stage. Moreover, he'd be doing that while again making good on another campaign promise.
Is it possible that President Trump was able to prognosticate his way through the unending Middle Eastern complexity and intricacy to goad the Iraqis into expelling US personnel from the country? Was he able to make good on his campaign promise with what appears to be an insane level of political acumen, savvy and strategy?
TWICE UPDATED WITH HUGE CONFIRMATIONS: Moves and countermoves! In a way, you could argue that the Trump Administration’s assassination of Iran’s most senior military official is old news. At the least, it was foreshadowed. Here’s how.
This is what it looks like when the Shadow Government/Deep State manufactures propaganda to support a preceding manufactured event - you get deranged Iranian leadership taunting the President of the United States on social media.