The Hunter Biden laptop is a pivotal and critical aggregation of highly incriminating evidence against the Biden Crime Family, which is why the Intelligence Community engaged in misinformation, disinformation and malinformation tactics to censor the topic and remove it from the 2020 electoral dialogue.
The IC’s censorship of the Biden laptop was a contributing mechanism to the theft of the 2020 election.
A close and years-long association and working relationship with the founder of Marco Polo [501c3], Garrett Ziegler, and the Marco Polo team, allows the Moonshine analysis to provide readers with an exclusive inside line of information on the Biden laptop and Marco Polo’s definitive and authoritative dossier dissecting it.
In fact and thanks to Ziegler, I had a forensic copy of the Biden laptop provided to me long before the 51 U.S. Intelligence Community officials lied on paper penning their names to analysis holding that it was Russian disinformation.
The exclusive Moonshine analysis began with the revelations from Marco Polo delineating the ongoing attempts to discredit Marco Polo, Garrett Ziegler, the Marco Polo team and its authoritative and definitive forensic analysis of and dossier on the Biden laptop by The Gateway Pundit, journalist Jack Maxey and Intelligence Community operative Yaacov Apelbaum.
In my former professional career doing fraud work for law firms, insurance companies and other third party clients, I routinely submitted standardized reports in both format and content to my principals.
Those reports were the basis for and evidence supporting case file determinations made by my principals and where I was subject to subpoena and being called to the stand to testify to methods, analysis and findings under oath and in the face of the full penalty of law for perjury.
This impacts our standardized reporting to principals in the sense that the reports must be accurate and evidenced beyond a reasonable doubt in every granular capacity and thus the reports are subjected to extreme scrutiny that requires water-tight front-end due diligence in vetting your own reporting prior to submission to principals.
This causes reports to principals to be vetted as entirely accurate before they are submitted to the principals and this ensures that the report will withstand severe scrutiny and meet legal thresholds.
In my professional experience and opinion, the Marco Polo dossier on the Biden laptop exceeds the parameters and standards for technical reports I routinely submitted as described above.
Marco Polo’s exhaustive sourcing and provision of primary and secondary source evidence is the spine of its comprehensive forensic analysis.
Marco Polo’s comprehensive analysis and reporting extends well beyond the laptop’s contents with its supportive evidentiary analysis and findings.
The initial and ongoing Moonshine analysis and reporting on the efforts to the Intelligence Community to discredit Marco Polo and its dossier exemplify the very nature of how political entities combat the truth from a platform of lies, cheating and stealing.
My earlier analysis sourced reporting from Zero Hedge including a statement from Ziegler following litigation filed against him and Marco Polo:
According to a Wednesday night filing, Hunter Biden’s legal team is suing Garrett Ziegler, who operates the website Marco Polo.
The 13-page lawsuit alleges that Ziegler and others violated federal and California privacy laws by “accessing, tampering with, manipulating, altering, copying and damaging computer data” gathered from Hunter Biden’s purported laptop and iPhone cloud storage without consent.
The lawsuit details how Ziegler and unnamed defendants allegedly obtained sensitive materials by hacking into encrypted data on Hunter Biden’s devices and uploading them to Ziegler’s website, where it remains public. In the lawsuit, Hunter Biden’s lawyers assert that the defendants had refused requests to “cease their unlawful activity” and return private data belonging to the president’s son. –CBS News
Pay very close attention to the specific and subtle language above that aligns entirely with the initial and ongoing analysis on the Intelligence Community’s discrediting attempts that occur when the substance of the truthful dossier reporting CAN NOT BE CHALLENGED.
Therefore, the suit doesn’t allege defamation [lying about the substance of the analysis] but rather it takes the exact form I said it would over a year and a half ago.
The litigation says, “accessing, tampering with, manipulating, altering, copying and damaging computer data.”
That same basis for the litigation is precisely described in my Telegram Post from 08 Apr 22:
HEADLINE: Hunter Laptop Computer Repairman Says No Way 450 Gigs of Additional Data Was Included on Hunter’s Laptop
If Maxey claims that the Hunter Biden hard drive contains more data than what the shop owner verifies AND Maxey says he’s working with out-of-country IT specialists to recover something that doesn’t exist, it means:
- Maxey appears to be augmenting the existing hard drive data with fabricated information
- This in-part explains his pretext targeting and discrediting of Garrett Ziegler, Marco Polo and ToreSays
- Maxey’s role is what I’m saying it is – to control the fallout and mitigate the resulting damage from something unavoidable: the report that will be released by the Marco Polo team
MOONSHINE 1: https://politicalmoonshine.com/2022/03/21/the-hunter-biden-hard-drive-ziegler-v-maxey-for-the-truth/
Political Moonshine
The exclusive Moonshine series on Marco Polo and the Biden Crime Family laptop:
The Moonshine coverage of the Biden laptop and Marco Polo is not limited to this series of primary articles. To learn more, please search the topic from the homepage.
Further information on the Biden laptop is also found at my professional site, E D I F Y Research & Consulting:
LAST UPDATED: 27 MAY 24
-End-
