The Trump, Barr, Wood, Powell and Giulani dynamic continues to bewilder and muddy the waters relative to sorting out both the four-year backdrop to the stolen 2020 election as well as the election itself. When William Barr was first named as Jeff Sessions’ successor as the Attorney General, my outlook was hopeful and I was determined to believe that he was the real McCoy. Over time and as caused by the obvious and complete dearth of anything resembling appropriate and legal remedies to that treasonous backdrop, the position on Barr has deteriorated and to a point where we currently reside.
Even so and having extended the benefit of the doubt to Barr, the door was left ajar for him to walk through and restore his “real McCoy” status to which we first ascribed. Lin Wood further compounded the already unclear picture in what must be tantamount to poor communications from the White House. Therein, Wood assailed Barr directly and publicly called for his termination only to learn that Barr’s statements were apparently misquoted and that a retraction was in order, which he made.
Before moving forward, there is much to know about Barr assuming it’s not already familiar information. In the short term, this sequence of articles (featured below latest to earliest) should be consumed and understood for proper backdrop. In the long term, the website has over 20 additional articles that speak to Barr’s apparently allegiance to institutional preservation over serving the DOJ, the rule of law and the President in the face of the outright treason he faces.
Staple Street Capital to UBS to China
Trump Card Barred – Declassification?
Baffling Barr Backs Down Again – Insufficient Voter Fraud Evidence to Affect Election Result
Flynn/McInerney Interview: Critical Confirmations Across the Board
Did China Steal the Keys to the Castle? Do Dominion, Smartmatic, Sequoia & HSBC Tie Stolen Election to California PERS?
Dominion: From Barr, Kirkland and Ellis to Comey, HSBC
What Did AG William Barr Know About Dominion Acquisition?
The Gravity of Inauguration Day Bears Down
Succinctly, here are the two scenarios that build on this information: 1) Barr has assumed and complete lie in wait posture for his entire tenure at DOJ as predicated on a comprehensive plan that would entail gutting the entire thing but not until after the commission of the crime is complete (that’s element that must be fulfilled as seen through the prosecutorial lens and in this case, it’s the stolen election because that is the long-run objective in all of this), which is accomplished by the certification of the election and perhaps even the 14 Dec 20 electoral college vote -or- 2) Barr has assumed a posture to deliver just enough traction to drag everyone along in an effort to reach inauguration day without any substantive adjudication of anyone thus comporting with the Deep State “DELAY IS THE PLAY!” strategy. None of this resembles anything new.
With the collective waters being further muddied over the course of the past day or so, President Trump remarked this morning in a way that delivered more uncertainty. Before considering what the President stated, we have to understand Barr’s previous remarks and this is extracted from our last article.
Now let’s consider the President’s remarks.
Take note that the President directly references one of the two scenarios outlined above, so we can mark this as a confirmation and one that may shed light on Barr’s overarching posture. Specifically, Trump acknowledged the first scenario that the evidence hasn’t been examined yet. This is a good development because it explains the inaction from Barr and positively so germane to the President’s interests.
The President is tipping his hand when he responded to the question, “Do you still have confidence in Bill Barr?” remarking, “Ask me that in a number of weeks from now.” This bodes well for Barr (Durham) and it speaks directly to what we began to outline in July – the the long-play isn’t actually stealing the election for the sake of stealing it, but rather to force a delay to inauguration day without a vote result and with the intent of invoking continuity of government protocols to remove the President and install House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who is number two in succession (Pence [#1 in succession] would also be removed because it’s an electoral matter.) I outlined all of that back in July.
From today, consider this.
Here is the relative video from July and know that it moves a bit slowly to allow time to consume what is presented. Pay very careful attention to what is said and what is outlined.
We’re not done, though. The President then comes back to the other crux issue underpinning this all and it’s the determination as to whether or not the actions by the President’s enemies are appropriate to justify civil or criminal litigation. So, although the Trump indicates that Barr as a prosecutor (criminal) may be fruitful in the coming weeks, this sounds like Trump goading Barr into action.
In the United States and with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) set aside, there are two primary vectors for litigation: criminal and civil (non-criminal.) Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Lin Wood are attorneys working in the civil domain and on behalf of the President but relative to the same issues. Where is Barr on the criminal side? That’s what the President is asking light of the abundance of evidence already available. Where are those criminal prosecutions?
It seems we should ask him that and revisit Barr “a number of weeks from now.”
The President ended his remarks abruptly circling back to the stolen election and the totality of his comments should be taken relative to his public address from yesterday.
As our older and wiser team member continues to remind us, can “D5” (looking at you, Q types) be anything other than December 5th? That’s in two days. We could be wiser then or it may take to 14 Dec 20 or even to 20 Jan 21.
Regardless, we’re at the precipice and it either breaks for America or China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Spain, Germany and more.