Press "Enter" to skip to content

Fractured Leadership Part IV: The Flynn Family Fact Set is Falling Apart

06 Dec 21

As the ever emerging truth continues to undo the narrative that former Lt. General Michael Flynn is any kind of national hero, it adjusts our lens to shift our perspective closer to one that holds him in contempt. The evidence of it all continues to lend credence to truth-tellers like Lin Wood and his claims.

Beginning around Thanksgiving, the trigger-happy social media poster Wood started a substantive string of claims threading through to the present and we’re paying close attention.

Fractured Leadership: Tumultuous Wood, Powell and Flynn Dynamic Causes Byrne and Obamagate to Resurface Leading to More Questions About Barr and Durham

Fractured Leadership: Part II – Wood, Flynn, Powell, Byrne and Trump Dynamic Unravels to the CCP’s Benefit Under the Cover of Another National Holiday

Fractured Leadership: Part III – The Full Slate of Claims by Wood Against Flynn, Powell and Byrne

[Related item] The Gateway Pundit: Impotent Critic or Worse? Refuses to Name Wood While Defending Flynn With No Defense at All

Part III maintains an updated list of all of Mr. Wood’s recent claims assembled in one place.

Wood has taken to dismantling Flynn in full a public spectacle that includes the dropping of heavy receipts and an open invitation for Flynn, Byrne and others to return to Tomotley to publicly reconcile their differences. They are differences that have this nation held hostage while on the brink of collapse and conversion to the CCP’s brand of communism.

Here’s the new evidence that continues to validate Wood, the nation’s preeminent defamation attorney, and it arrives from Zero Hedge as sourced from Politico.

With respect to Wood’s claims about Flynn relative to the Deep State, Flynn’s role and his family’s role in it, his impropriety with money associated with Powell and Byrne and more, we learn this,

A former DC National Guard official has accused two senior Army officials of lying to Congress about the circumstances surrounding the January 6th Capitol riot in order to protect a top Army official who didn’t want to send the Guard to the Capitol, Politico reports.

In a 36-page memo sent to the Jan. 6 select committee this month, Col. Earl Matthews – who held high-level National Security Council and Pentagon positions under Trump – accused Army General Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt of being “absolute and unmitigated liars” for how they characterized the events of Jan. 6.

Lt. General Michael Flynn [L] & U.S. General Charles Flynn [R]

Of note, Flynn served as deputy chief of staff for operations on Jan. 6, while Matthews was serving as the top attorney to Maj. Gen. William Walker – then commanding general of the DC National Guard. Matthews was in a unique position to know what happened that day.

Matthews’ memo defends the Capitol attack response by Walker, who now serves as the House sergeant at arms, amplifying Walker’s previous congressional testimony about the hourslong delay in the military’s order for the D.C. National Guard to deploy to the riot scene. -Politico

Matthews accuses Flynn and Piatt of lying to Congress about how they responded to urgent requests for the DC guard to be quickly deployed, and claims that the Pentagon inspector general’s November report on the attack was “replete with factual inaccuracies.”

He says the Army has created its own ‘closely held’ revisionist document regarding the riot that’s “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist.’

“Every leader in the D.C. Guard wanted to respond and knew they could respond to the riot at the seat of government,” reads the memo.

What actually went down, according to Matthews:

The memo says that at 2:30 p.m. on January 6, Matthews and Walker were on a conference call with senior military and law enforcement officials, in which then-Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund “pleaded” for the immediate deployment of the National Guard to the Capitol after rioters breached the perimeter.

Piatt and Flynn denied the request.

“LTG Piatt stated that it would not be his best military advice to recommend to the Secretary of the Army that the D.C. National Guard be allowed to deploy to the Capitol at that time,” Matthews wrote, adding: “LTGs Piatt and Flynn stated that the optics of having uniformed military personnel deployed to the U.S. Capitol would not be good.”

Instead, Piatt and Flynn suggested that the Guardsmen serve as de-facto DC police traffic control officers so that the cops could attend to the Capitol.

In another document obtained by Politico, Piatt and Flynn “recommended for DC Guard to standby” at 2:37 p.m. rather than immediately deploying to the Capitol during the riot.

Four minutes later, Flynn again “advised D.C. National Guard to standby until the request has been routed” to then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy as well as then-acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller.

Matthews says everyone on the call was “astounded.”

Piatt and Flynn then lied to Congress – denying that they had said the Guard shouldn’t deploy to the Capitol.

According to Matthews, they committed “outright perjury.”

Perjury say you? Perjury is lying under oath and who knows lies better than the nation’s preeminent defamation attorney, Lin Wood?

As I’ve argued since before all of this and as it relates to the continued attacks on Wood, who really thinks a defamation attorney is out peddling lies of this magnitude; especially the nation’s most highly regarded one?

Wood is right. Wood is a truth teller. The truth tells us that.

The Flynn’s are Deep State operatives and our lens on them needed the adjustment it got. The truth tells us that, too.

We previously covered Walker and the reciprocity from Pelosi respective to his promotion to Sergeant of Arms for the U.S. House of Representatives relative to 06 Jan 21. We’ve also previously covered the FBI’s role in it.


One Comment

Leave a ReplyCancel reply