By all appearances and according to tangible evidence, the actual face of Xwitter’s billionaire owner Elon Musk is masked in service to the social media platform’s veiling of the truth about its continued and rampant censorship of particular American voices. Not without a sense of irony, the mask behind which Musk presents himself is fabricated out of ignorant others championing him as the new messiah of free speech, who is worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize. To that notion I say, “Put your hip boots on because the horse shit doesn’t get much deeper than that.” For anyone thinking that Musk is a bona fide advocate for free speech, judge the man by his own and his company’s actions; not the words emanating from behind his mask. A rudimentary examination of the evidence below confirms everything being laid-out here and that should leave everyone asking if Elon Musk is an ally or and adversary.
Musk and Xwitter don’t censor all Americans, though, because censorship doesn’t work that way in the context of political regime change and the conversion to Marxism.
In that scenario, the COVID-19 mask-wearing, Progressive, liberal, clot shot-getting, race baiting, riotous, burning, Kool-Aid drinking and window-licking population of social justice warriors does the regime’s hollering and bidding for it.
Therefore, the policies established by Musk and Xwitter guarantee that it’s free speech and amplification for these folks; and where dissent has been conveniently and preemptively stomped-out.
On the other hand and for the rest of us who dare to think, write and speak independently, critically and in ways to discern how the unvarnished truth stands antithetical to the establishment and its Marxist platform designed to galvanize institutional preservation, Musk and Xwitter just decided to shut us up and not let us speak at all.
Here’s the rub, though and it comports with this: For conservatives, the only difference between a Democrat and a Republican is that Democrats stab you from the front while Republicans stab you in the back.
What’s worse than a Republican is the concept of someone who sends someone else to stab you in the back and they do it without the courtesy of a reach around to let you know that it’s happening or who is doing it.
Democrats LOVE and I mean LOVE to stab folks in the front and then parade around in the full spectrum to let everyone know what they did.
That requires actual balls.
Buying a company, proclaiming to be a new beacon of free speech and then hiring a new CEO to facilitate the same old censorship while taking a backseat “to being exec chair & CTO, overseeing product, software & sysops” is called outsourcing tactical objectives to a proxy and it requires no balls at all…just a lot of money.
Less than one day after announcing a new hire had been made, the billionaire Twitter owner shared that Linda Yaccarino, who just left her role as chairman of global advertising and partnerships at NBCUniversal, was his replacement.
People
Yaccarino, who worked at NBCUniversal also worked at Turner Broadcasting and more importantly, she chairs a committee at Klaus Schwab’s Word Economic Forum.
In April 2023 before joining Xwitter, Yaccarino said this:
“We can all agree … this freedom of speech, deserves a bit more reach,” Yaccarino wrote on Twitter at the time alongside a link to video of their conversation.
Linda Yaccarino, CEO X [Twitter]
Allow me:
“This freedom of speech…” as if it’s a shiny trinket to be admired, be played with and be controlled but no more.
“Deserves a bit more reach…” as if to place a substantial impediment in front of a constitutionally protected right by allowing only for a minimal but arbitrary extension of that right to particular people but not everyone.
What Yaccarino should have said is that the death of free speech is the death of freedom and liberty and we will guarantee that everyone shall enjoy unfettered free speech.
Yaccarino didn’t say that, though, because she was being brought in to do a job that Musk couldn’t; at least not while wearing the mask he currently does.
So, Musk invited the fox into the hen house and appointed her censorship czar and the evidence for it is laid-out in the following.
Six weeks from the date of that post is the third week of June 2023 and my account appears to have been split in half and shadow and ghost banned beginning sometime between 03 Jun 23 and 10 Jul 23; and it continues today.
I evidence all three aspects below.
So, Musk resides behind his mask and permits his newly hired CEO to do his censorship bidding for him while he parades around as a Nobel Peace Prize candidate advocating for free speech; and he does this from the backseat of his own company.
This is important: I generally dislike social media and had no personal social media accounts prior to opening-up a variety of Moonshine accounts in an effort to begin sharing my immediate analysis on COVID-19 that no one else was discussing in the same ways: COVID-19 IS ENTERPRISE FRAUD [and so is about everything else the federal apparatus does.]
I researched and vetted my own analysis for over a year and no one was saying what I was saying when I said it.
The brand new account lingered around 26 “followers” [I dislike that term] for a while before gaining a little traction perhaps to around 3k.
Honestly, I can’t quite remember those numbers but it doesn’t matter because no one had ever hear of Political Moonshine and Twitter was going to keep it that way forever and for good reason.
This was my brand new, first Moonshine account and as a purveyor of truth, it didn’t take long to end up in purgatory.
Twitter never unlocked that account to ban it forever.
I eventually gave-up on holding for the account be restored, downloaded the feed, which I have on a hard drive, and deleted the account from Twitter’s platform.
For what follows, it’s important to note that long before COVID, I was examining Ukraine and had branded the country the ‘Keystone of Corruption‘ in work drawing back to 2016 and going forward to the present.
In the run-up to the 2020 election, I worked from the existing Ukraine analysis to augment it with developments I discovered in a DOJ press release.
I posted this thread in July 2020, which was 78 posts long and sourced/cited to Moonshine standards; and it laid-out enormously problematic circumstances for the Bidens and the Clintons.
That post was the beginning of the end for the first Moonshine account but most importantly, it indicated how Twitter thought it was necessary to censor and then outright ban an account with no following; that no one had ever heard of; but with truthful content a universe away from what the MSM was propagating as written by an ordinary American who was exactly and precisely correct.
Twitter was censoring the truth and anyone propagating it; and a corrupt and criminal federal apparatus was the spine to all of it.
For any doubters and to put the cards on the table for everyone to see, consider the analysis I completed on behalf of an attorney client litigating against Xwitter [published with permission]:
These graphic illustrations from that analysis paint the picture for us [this analysis completed in Sep. 2022]:
In dialogue with my principal attorney, I made it very clear that I believed Musk’s acquisition of Twitter now X [Xwitter] was explicitly for its controlled demolition and that had to entail the continuance of censorship veiled by the illusion of a new Xwitter boss and newfound freedom of speech for those previously censored and banned.
In reality though, the new Xwitter boss is the same as the old Xwitter boss.
As Musk was acquiring Twitter to make it X, I opened the now heavily shadow-banned and ghost-banned current Xwitter account in December 2022.
On that same timeline in early December 2022, I wrote this in an article entitled ‘Something Is Not Right at Musk’s Twitter, Is it Good or Bad? Who is Alexander Macgillivray?’:
Something is not right at Elon Musk’s Twitter and the jury is still out as to whether it’s good or bad. My insights to Twitter come from a very unique perspective that I believe few have, which is provided through my work and clients. […]
Here’s the end; the position I’ve assumed in the fallout of all things Twitter: I’m not so sure Musk is the savior that many make him out to be in the sense that according to the evidence, he presents as the private sector point man to reconcile BIG TECH and BIG MEDIA on the back end of unavoidable problems and circumstances at the platform. The evidence aggregates to make Musk’s and Matthew Tabbi’s revelations and assertions in the Twitter files questionable, which draws motive and intent into question; if not conflict. In other words, it looks like Twitter fat is being served up for people to chew on but the real meat isn’t on the plate; at least not yet.
Political Moonshine
This image represents the last post that Xwitter will currently scroll to on my feed [10 Jul 23].
Note the engagement [780 views] and the empty space at the end of the feed [above].
I opened the current Moonshine account in December 2022 respective to Musk’s pending acquisition and a second life there.
Where are all of the posts between December 2022 and 10 Jul 23 and why won’t they load?
Now watch what happens.
Note the engagement in this post at 43k views and its date 03 Jun 23]:
When accessing Xwitter through the Moonshine website or internet search engine while using my phone and no matter the settings or deletion of cookies, etc., the Xwitter profile feed always loads to the above 03 Jun 23 post as the most recent version and while the platform does not permit scrolling up to the actual present [today].
However, when accessing Xwitter and for example using my laptop and where I have Xwitter cookies and a login interface, the Moonshine profile feed loads to the actual most recent post today through to 10 Jul 23 as shown above, but does not scroll past that post to the other post on 03 Jun 23 with 43k views.
It’s as if the account has been split in half by algorithms.
One thing is for sure: the account is absolutely, undeniably and irrefutably ghost-banned and shadow-banned by algorithms.
Here’s a question for you, Elon: If I’m paying for a blue check mark and still being censored, does that not represent breach of contract?
I’ve received no notice – official or otherwise – from Xwitter that my account contains anything in violation of the terms of use or that would warrant subjecting its content to censorship according to the community standards and guidelines, but yet it is censored nonetheless.
My only notice of Xwitter’s clandestine and active censorship of the Moonshine account was received from me once the egregious engagement anomalies were as obvious on their face as they were consistent.
I’m a bourbon man and I only drink it neat; and that’s important for what follows because I typed it while drinking bourbon and that often elicits colorful language.
It begins with this post:
And it led to this post:
The algorithmic censorship and banning began immediately and I captured it immediately because I routinely monitor the engagement numbers and how they present and adjust with about every post.
This is done to inform my ongoing positions on Xwitter to ensure they are accurate.
In fact and on several occasions, I have written and deleted without posting a version of this post reckoning the bourbon greased-up my filter and finally let it through.
It’s also important to note that it’s not the first time I’ve publicly taken Musk to task on Xwitter as I’ve made several posts specifically about X’s censorship and banning of the Moonshine account.
I never receive a reply, of course.
ONCE AGAIN THIS PLATFORM IS A PROBLEM – THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE WILL NOT APPEAR IN PREVIEW OR PUBLISH so here is a screenshot from the Substack version and please refer to it for links [I’m leaving the original text in place in the event the problem is overcome.]
In private communication with a cohort of on-reservation COVID-19 colleagues known by most, some of them experience the same algorithmic censorship and ghost and shadow banning.
Bret Weinstein agrees:
Leave a ReplyCancel reply