Press "Enter" to skip to content



12 Apr 20 (TWENTY-EIGHTH article in a series)

The cause of death is for sale. There’s no other explanation that reasonably makes sense. What’s it going to cost you? Only everything – a ‘new normal’ is being ushered-in akin to what we experienced following the events of 9/11. Pay attention to mainstream messaging and the subtext in all of it – the evidence is everywhere like with this State Farm ad. Just listen to the opening line:

You sick of hearing about your s-word, you know – SAFETY- or any version of it? How important it is to everyone? How all these strangers – people that you apparently didn’t even know you knew – are so concerned for your s-word? And what about those uncertain and challenging times?

Ahhhhh, F-word!! I sure as hell am. I digress.

This will be perhaps the oddest segue you’ll ever see: moving from a State Farm Insurance commercial delivering NWO ‘new normal’ subtext to Bill Gates and using a ‘spirit cook’ to do it in Marina Ambrovic. So here goes.

This is Marina Ambrovic.

She’s super famous if you’re unfamiliar; well, at least in certain circles. Circles like the Clintons, Podestas, all of Hollywood and a bunch of others you’d recognize.

This is some of her work.

And this is one of her events.

Here’s the best segue of all time and I’ll leave it to you to make the deduction.

So she’s a good fit for Microsoft? Uh huh…..

This is Bill Gates.

This is also Bill Gates.

This, too, is Bill Gates (linked article at bottom of post – see title.)

And this is Bill Gates unable to say the word “morality” earnestly and in good faith.

It’s clear that many of us following the COVID-19 pandemic from the outbreak through today immediately began addressing relevant matters such as cui bono? That research almost immediately takes us to Gates; but only after a layover at George Soros as covered previously in the first several articles. The convergence of Gates and Soros on the 2016-2017 timeline (and before and after) can’t be emphasized enough and developing your own understanding of it all will be burdensome but helpful.

Today, we are revisiting Bill Gates and here’s what must be understood: trying to comprehend the degree of engrossment and entanglement of Bill Gates – the billionaire, the chief funder of the WHO and the global health and world hunger philanthropist – relative to virology and vaccination is a bit like trying fill a swimming pool one thimble full at a time. The information is voluminous and overwhelming. Frankly, the work here reflects on Gates’ backstory and is in no way a complete picture.

Here is a quick sidebar before getting into it and it’s one that’s a particularly puzzling aspect of Gates’ personal history whereby the billionaire maintained an ongoing relationship with another billionaire – Jeffrey Epstein – following Epstein’s conviction and release from prison as a sexual predator. It’s peculiar indeed and perhaps it speaks to Gates’ motive here in the spirit of self-preservation? Or not. I digress.

With the vastness of Gates’ backstory, we’ll default to memetic learning, as you can tell already, to digest as much information as possible. This article is unlike others I’ve written and it relies heavily on graphics, social media and other items to allow you to consume large amounts of information quickly.

Politico highlights aspects of Gates’ WHO backdrop that are significant (EMPHASIS added,)

Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom. This largesse gives him outsized influence over its agenda, one that could grow as the U.S. and the U.K. threaten to cut funding if the agency doesn’t make a better investment case.

The result, say his critics, is that Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s. Rather than focusing on strengthening health care in poor countries — that would help, in their view, to contain future outbreaks like the Ebola epidemic — the agency spends a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with the measurable outcomes Gates prefers, such as the effort to eradicate polio.

Evidence of Gates’ unprecedented influence abounds in ways subtle and showy.

He is treated liked a head of state, not only at the WHO, but also at the G20— Geneva-based NGO representative

The Gates Foundation has pumped more than $2.4 billion into the WHO since 2000, as countries have grown reluctant to put more of their own money into the agency, especially after the 2008 global financial crisis.

Dues paid by member states now account for less than a quarter of WHO’s $4.5 billion biennial budget. The rest comes from what governments, Gates, other foundations and companies volunteer to chip in. Since these funds are usually earmarked for specific projects or diseases, WHO can’t freely decide how to use them.

Most of the Gates Foundation’s influence in the WHO is very discreet, she said, adding that it can also decide to take initiatives outside of the organization, as it did with GAVI, which helps the poorest countries buy vaccines in bulk at a discount, or with a recently launched Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, an alliance to develop vaccines for emerging infectious diseases.

But the foundation’s focus on delivering vaccines and medicines, rather than on building resilient health systems, has drawn criticism. And some NGOs worry it may be too close to industry.


For more perspective, here is what I’ve previously written about Gates including a quote from James Fetzer, respectively,

So, not only is billionaire and global string puller George Soros standing to benefit from this “outbreak” of coronavirus in Wuhan, China, so does billionaire and global string puller Bill Gates. Gates and his foundation just happened to have funded and participated in an exercise/drill simulating specifically a coronavirus outbreak some 6-weeks prior to the actual one. Not only that, Gates also happens to financially back the Pirbright Institute, which happens to own a patent for a strand of the coronavirus that may (will likely) provide a cure (vaccine) that is sure to also produce a king’s ransom. (SOURCE)

Here is the Fetzer quote (EMPHASIS mine),

In this report we take an inside look at Event 201, which took place in NYC on October 18 2019.

Event 201 is a high-level pandemic exercise hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

This is extremely fascinating because this pandemic simulation exercise of coronavirus took place about 6 weeks before the first illness from the coronavirus was actually reported in Wuhan, China.

That is one hell of a coincidence if you believe in that sort of thing.

Another fascinating connection is the fact that not only did the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation participate in and help set up the pandemic simulation of a coronavirus outbreak, but they just so happen to fund the group who owns the patent to the deadly coronavirus and are already working on a vaccine to solve the current crisis.


Here’s the relevant information pertaining to Event 201.

Anyone played or coached athletics before? What do you do for days prior to any scheduled contest? You practice. I digress.

Anybody else concerned that Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum and John Hopkins practiced “COVID’ing” before the actual COVID-19 outbreak, as if there is some semblance of foreknowledge or predictability to it all (more about predictability below)?

Is there any wonder NOW as to why John Hopkins is so intricately involved in all of this?

Anybody concerned that Bill Gates has purchased and now essentially owns and wields the World Health Organization; along with the US and China (now) being the other two premier funders, but that he’s also enveloped similar others? Would you be surprised to learn that Gates has also essentially purchased and owns the CDC?

It seems that just as with the WHO, the CDC was also “for sale” and Bill Gates was their buyer. That’s a lot of money that has been promised to Dr. Fauci. Another way to look at this – in real world terms – is that GATES NOW OWNS FAUCI, too.

I wonder what Dr. Fauci prognosticated for President Trump’s administration in the days before his inauguration?


Before we can consider Fauci’s prediction, we have to again give attention to then President Obama augmenting the presidential transition process with Public Law 114-136 circa 13 Mar 16. For context, understand the backdrop to Obama’s executive order. Here’s what I wrote previously with emphasis added,

First, realize this. With almost near certainty, internal polling likely informed the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton had no chance of winning the 2016 election in the months ahead. Heck, to know this all you had to do was look at the complete dearth of audience and following that she had at all of her campaign events and recalling that she essentially refused to hold any (Hillary napped through campaign season.) To the contrary, candidate Trump’s crowd sizes were akin to what we see today. Just like we know right now that the Democrats are dead in the water for 2020, it is virtually guaranteed that they knew they were dead in the water for 2016 when they passed this law on 18 Mar 16. So then, WHY did they pass it? That’s a rhetorical question.

From President Obama’s executive order (EMPHASIS added):

The gathering was held to satisfy a requirement in a 2016 law that updated the procedures around presidential transitions to require, among other things, that the outgoing administration “prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.” Obama also mentioned it in a 2016 executive order laying out his transition goals.


More from President Obama’s executive order,

c) The White House Transition Coordinating Council shall:

(i) provide guidance to executive departments and agencies (agencies) and the Federal Transition Coordinator regarding preparations for the Presidential transition, including succession planning and preparation of briefing materials;

(ii) facilitate communication and information sharing between the transition representatives of eligible candidates and senior employees in agencies and the Executive Office of the President, including the provision of information relevant to facilitating the personnel aspects of a Presidential transition and such other information that, in the Council’s judgment, is useful and appropriate, as long as providing such information is not otherwise prohibited by law; and

(iii) prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.


President Obama clearly took extra legislative steps to ensure that “emergency preparedness and response exercises” were included in the transition process before President Trump was inaugurated and long before COVID-19 broke out. Obama’s proclivity for prognosticating is second to none, eh? Or perhaps it’s reflective of constructive elements? What about Fauci’s ability to foresee the future?

Here is what Dr. Anthony Fauci predicted just prior to the Obama/Trump transition meetings held 13 Jan 17 (SOURCE) (EMPHASIS added.)

The history of the last 32 years that I have been the director of the NIAID will tell the next administration that there is no doubt they will be faced with the challenges their predecessors were faced with.


From the same source, Healio,

During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.


The timing is critical to understand; if not MONUMENTAL. For context first consider our hypothesis in-part here and in more complete form in the housekeeping items below – “Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17.”

Fauci’s statement above preceded the transition meetings by two days (note that the timeline for the construct is substantial and so please refer to the housekeeping items for a more complete timeline.) The important dates here are:
13 Mar: Obama> Public Law 114-136 passes augmenting the transition process
11 Jan: Fauci predicts pandemic scenario for Trump administration
13 Jan: Outgoing Obama administration presents pandemic scenario to incoming Trump administration
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment mgrs., engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration
15 Mar: FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT

Here are actual slides leaked from the transition meetings mentioned above. Please pay particularly close attention to how Bill Gates’ and China’s World Health Organization is thrust into the position of preeminent authority on the matter because that is immensely important to our assertions here.

Just glancing at your television or the timeline above tells us that #FalseFlagFauci is beholden to others and not giving fidelity to legitimately fighting a global viral pandemic. In fact, his behavior is enough to consider fraudulent aspects to it.

Let’s examine Dr. Fauci and his progression of changing positions and we’ll do so by viewing the short clips in the following posts. Here’s Fauci on 21 Jan telling Americans that COVID-19 “is not a major threat for the people in the United States.”

Here’s Fauci months later on 04 Apr and on CNN of all places. Take note of the significant change in his position. How can this be for an “expert?”

That’s a rhetorical question that actually proves my entire point – I’m not questioning his expertise rather I am questioning his allegiance.

But don’t take my word for it. Take his.

You don’t understand why that’s not happening, sir? It’s because, Dr. Fauci, you told them – and I quote you here, sir – “This is not a major threat for the people in United States, and this is not something the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about.”

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

There’s more. Why is Dr. Fauci REPEATEDLY and subtlety but overtly signalling to MSM White House correspondents whom are routine adversarial and confrontational to the President during daily COVID-19 briefings?

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

Wait, it gets worse. Not only has #FalseFlagFauci been apparently colluding with the MSM by working behind the scenes to provide reporters with prefabricated questions to frame the President in the public’s view and according to his wishes (his handlers’ wishes); and not only has the so-called expert backtracked on his own devastating early advice; but he got caught on a live camera by the President for making said leaks. See for yourself – it’s a scene, man (video at bottom of post.)

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

Don’t go anywhere, there’s more. After watching this, ask yourself if #FalseFlagFauci is fighting a virus or the conventions of traditional America?

No more shaking hands? Are you kidding me? Realize this, America – Birx and Fauci desire to issue permanent guidelines that now stray down the path of keeping us from being not just American, but human.

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

So, ask yourself – Do you believe that Fauci is speaking with honesty and candor and giving fidelity to the cause at hand or is it something different? Is Fauci acting according to his expertise or allegiance? Are we dealing with an authentic global viral pandemic or an intentional global viral pandemic politically constructed to steal an election that is impossible to legitimately win? Perhaps it’s all something criminal and even fraudulent?

The evidence simply doesn’t stack-up; especially when considering contemporaneous media sources depicting highly questionable “cause of death” declarations and other statistical anomalies. For starters, we must consider the memo that has been leaked, which now shapes how medical providers are required to declare cause of death in suspected COVID-19 cases. Here’s that memo, which you can examine independently and which is also included in the first source below it:

From a single source, here are contemporaneous reports of conflicts and potentially fraudulent reporting of COVID-19 cause of death incidents and other relevant issues courtesy of TGP. Know that it’s a small selection from a long list of stories and reflective of many across the media spectrum:

02 Apr / TGP: HUGE! Infectious Disease Expert Says His Clinic Has Not Seen ANYONE UNDER 70 Who was not Obese or Pre-Diabetic Get Seriously Ill with COVID-19 (VIDEO)

02 Apr / TGP: BREAKING: New York Data Confirms Once Again – 99% of Coronavirus Fatalities Have Pre-Existing Conditions – 94% of Fatalities Over Age 45! …Open The Economy!

04 Apr / TGP: HUGE! From CDC Website: Hospitals to List COVID-19 as Cause of Death Even if It’s “Assumed to Have Caused Or Contributed to Death” – Lab Tests Not Required
Relevant: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” CDC guidelines issued March 24 read. “Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued. If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”

10 Apr / TGP: WTH? Massachusetts Is Going Back and Adding Coronavirus Deaths to Totals – Is this to Get More Cash?
Relevant: According to Senator Dr. Scott Jensen, “Right now Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much. Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things impact on what we do.”

10 Apr / TGP: MORE FRAUD EXPOSED: Washington State Coronavirus Field Hospital Will Be Dismantled Without Treating a Single Patient

11 Apr / TGP: UNACCEPTABLE! So-Called ‘Experts’ Were Off by 25 MILLION in California! Golden State Reaches Peak COVID-19 Deaths at 596 and 21,500 Infected

12 Apr / TGP: Fauci Fun Facts: Dr. Fauci’s AIDS Predictions Were Also WAY OFF THE MARK
Relevant: Fauci’s history of inaccurate modeling and a video clip (bottom clip) worth seeing firsthand: video of Fauci overstepping Trump to tamp down media enthusiasm for hydroxychloroquine.)

What kind of doctor steps on the President’s toes to pull back on the reigns of a highly demonstrable and promising treatment for a global pandemic? It’s all very bizarre, much like the Left’s and MSM’s own near total aversion to hydroxychloroquine.

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

Before we move on to data, perhaps we should hear from one of Fauci’s colleagues:

There is substantial evidence that the infection and mortality rates of COVID-19 are grossly inaccurate and to the extent that it warrants legitimate concern about the possibility of a cohort of individuals antithetical to the President’s agenda and adversarial to him are executing a massive, politically constructed false flag event to steal the 2020 election.

Here’s how. Let’s examine some data.

Here we note a $171 million dollar increase in funding from the US to Gates’ and China’s WHO as converging on the important and established 2016-2017 timeline:

NYC’s early data suggest the same as what was being seen across the board nationally and primarily in that younger individuals with no underlying conditions were largely unaffected:

Consider hospitalization models versus actual numbers:

Here we notice an historically anomalous drop in pneumonia death rates and this is a backbone aspect to our hypothesis:

And that brings us to the crux of it all:

Study the graphic above merging two graphs and take note of the inverse relationship between the two: pneumonia deaths, which you can see dating back to 2014 relative to COVID-19 infection rates, which project to a similar line for fatalities. What immediately emerges is the historically anomalous and unaccounted for drop in pneumonia deaths that just happens to mirror the COVID-19 outbreak in the US for 2019-2020. You know, as if they just swapped places.

Now do you now see why we have an objective, data-driven, statistically based position from which to question the entire scope of this pandemic, which more accurately reflects a politically constructed false flag scenario?

In more detail, consider how COVID-19 can be accounted for by pneumonia and the flu:

Note: all COVID-19 symptoms can be accounted for by either pneumonia or the flu and at the same time we have the anomaly demonstrated above (a marked drop in pneumonia deaths.) Also, pay attention to the fatality rates between COVID-19 and the flu (follow the blue arrows) and then ask yourself why you never get locked down when exponentially more people die from an even more widely spread disease? Then ask yourself what happens the next time some autocratic, authoritarian and dictatorial plutocrat makes a mole hill into a mountain and declares a national emergency?

So, what are we saying? In short, we’re saying that Birx and Fauci have usurped the President’s emergency powers and have hi-jacked them on their way to sabotaging (a favorite word of Bill Barr) the Presidency and they’re doing it by selling cooked-up data to the American public and using it to keep us locked-up in our proverbial bedrooms until we learn to vote better or until the nation converts into a complete dumpster fire instead of the partial one we have now. I weaved in some sarcasm so please tap the brakes on a literal translation, but you know what I’m saying.

But what about of the all of the honest, hardworking healthcare providers? How could they be compelled to do such a thing. Let me tell you – $$$$$$. It’s written into the legislation.

Here’s what I mean by that and it’s a structural component to the entire premise of the articlethe cause of death is essentially for sale so long as health officials are making those declarations in alignment with the scope of the leaked memo. How so? Think of it this way. The federal funding received per patient relative to the design of the construct is analog to fuel for an engine. Now that the engine has started with a spark (viral outbreak) and medical providers are feeling the full weight of its impact (the one’s that are), it’s the fuel (federal funding) that keeps it running. It’s a financial incentive from the primary source of funding to entice providers to “see things our way.” Of course they’re going to comply, the funders also have oversight of and regulate their entire profession.

According to Senator Dr. Scott Jensen in an article at TGP, “Right now Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much. Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things impact on what we do.”

So, how and why would hospitals go along? Well for one, their cause of death declarations have been shaped as outlined in the leaked memo and if that’s not good enough, for every time a hospital admits a COVID-19 patient, there’s an infusion of federal dollars that follows. It should come as no surprise that providers would more or less go along on these lines. When is the last time you heard health care workers complaining about too much funding? Exactly.

Let’s get back to Bill Gates. He authored a revealing article on 28 Feb 20, which again is prior to the 11 Mar 20 pandemic/emergency declaration. I’ve analyzed the article for us here and it’s foreboding:

Distilled down to its most basic form, Bill Gates wants a massive, low-cost global vaccination campaign paid for by private and public entities and he’s bound and determined to find a way to make it happen and most likely a politically expedient one; like the pandemic we face right now.

Some online have argued that Gates has called for digital certificates of immunization, or certificates of vaccination ID, as in a certificate being a form of identification. It would be functional within society (access, services, etc.) and based on that assumption, there’s a strong contingency of folks whom firmly believe this, which I’ll let you deduce:

[C]ertificate [O]f [V]accination [ID]

That’s a little rich for my taste so I’ll leave that to said contingency of folks.

Here’s an interview from Gates from this morning and we’re only focusing on the first 50 seconds or so. Listen.

Did you catch that? Allow me to quote him for you, “The thing that will get us back to the world we had before coronavirus is the vaccine and getting that out to all 7 billion people.”

Now reconsider the summary in the above graphic that I wrote the night before. He wants to vaccinate the entire planet – he just said so – but like with anything else, there has to be proper rationale and justification. Enter COVID-19.

We know that Fauci and Birx are working closely together, but they also keep other company like powerful Democrats; some of whom spent the entirety of the COVID-19 outbreak pushing a fraudulent impeachment scheme but then again, that’s why we’re here. That fraudulent impeachment scheme was the cover for COVID-19.

We thought the entanglements continued, but apparently not. I’m actually back into this article revising this section and thanks to some help from Shazlandia. It’s been verified that Laura Birx, who is a Gates employee, is not Deborah Birx’s daughter. There were reported recent scrubs to her social media account(s) and that can be telling, which is why I initially included it and as reportedly verified by others. We’ll continue to dig on that last name.

So if this Birx – the Gates employee but not the doctor’s daughter – ends up having a familial connection, we’ll come back a fourth time and update it. Unfortunately it gets rid of my poke at HB and PP so I’m leaving it in and totally out of context and only because it feels good. > All in the family, folks, all in the family…. just ask Hunter Biden and Paul Pelosi.

Remember – not mom.

We have one more task and then we tie back to Birx and then wrap-up this behemoth article. Watch and listen closely to Attorney General Bill Barr’s comments from his recent interview with Laura Ingraham (cue to 1:40 for relevant portion):

What did Barr tell us?

1:40- Pay very close attention here because I believe that Barr tips his hand as he begins to discuss how USDOJ can actually multi-task and manage more than one matter at a time. Off-script in a seemingly impromptu moment in replying back to Ingraham, Barr states that USDOJ is able to “handle different kinds of cases.” Fair enough but listen to the direction that Barr takes it in his own word choice and with an uptick in energy from his normally reserved and patented monotone delivery. Barr quips, “Uh, maybe fraud is not on the top of their mind but we still police fraud. It’s very interesting because drugs kill 70,000 Americans a year – “seventy THOUSAND a year.”

Understand what Barr has done here and it’s genius in my honest opinion; flipping the entire construct on its head for the American people. The current US death toll for COVID-19, as documented with evidence from an abundance of sources, is fraudulent.

Here’s the play – Barr took the impetus for the lock-down (death rate) and blew it up implicitly relative to the COVID-19 death rate, which is measly by historic pandemic numbers and a fraction of the narcotics death rate cited by Barr; not to mention annual flu and pneumonia mortality. It’s important to recognize the inaccurate data sets here because they are critical in all of it; especially when you being to realize the current data sets are being manipulated to support a false narrative.

Barr essentially stated live in front of a national (global) audience, “Hey, you’re slaughtering me in the press over drug interdiction efforts when narcotics KILL 70,000 Americans per year and you SHUT DOWN THE COUNTRY AND THE ECONOMY FOR 19,701 DEATHS,” and that, Ladies and Gentleman, is called FRAUD.

Take a close and careful look at Birx here.

She knows…. F-R-A-U-D. So does Bill Barr. So do we.

As Americans near a breaking point with a locked-down country, a ravaged economy, raging cabin fever, unreasonable local authorities (in some places) and millions out of work, it seems the evidence is demonstrating that the CAUSE OF DEATH is FOR SALE. The asking price? Only a ‘new normal.’


*Please find the timeline at the bottom.

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

13 Mar: Obama Executive order/Public Law 113-146 Presidential Transition

11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump


13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD, NVSS issues COVID-19 diagnosis shaping memo
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown


Leave a ReplyCancel reply