Press "Enter" to skip to content

Everything is Wrong, Nothing is Right and Uvalde is the Latest Perfect Example

27 May 22

*This article is being continually updated with new developments here.

Everything is wrong. Nothing is right. It’s an undeniable and intuitive perception that likely resounds with most people possessing a modicum of objectivity and no matter they be conservative, liberal or somewhere in between. Uvalde is the latest perfect example of this and it gives us cause to reiterate that there is a distinct difference between what is happening to us and what is being done to us; recognizing that nothing is without purpose. In fact, most things serve multiple purposes and objectives according to the tenets of psychological warfare and social programming the likes of which have been unpacked on this nation for decades. Uvalde is the latest perfect example of this, too.

Drawing back to the events of 9/11 and moving forward to Barack Obama’s pre-inauguration promise to fundamentally transform the United States of America, from 2001 to the present, America has endured an increasingly and progressively intense agenda of sown chaos, fear and terror by means of constructed and fabricated events. They’re called false flag operations and regardless of whether people want to brand that “conspiracy theory” or something different, false flags are without question and undeniably so, very real and used in extremely effective fashion to steer the populace to desired ends. Perhaps Uvalde will be the impetus to change the doubters’ perceptions about false flag operations.

The unmitigated insanity of the time period from illegitimate proxy President Joe Biden’s fraudulent inauguration to the present represents the most intensified period of psychological warfare and false flag operations to-date and they are accounted for by understanding that the gap is being closed and time reclaimed from the four-year interruption and interceding on the broader agenda represented by the Trump Administration; even though it, too, weathered much engineered chaos in the attempts to undo it. Uvalde is the most recent perfect example and a basic timeline begins the discussion.

Examining this below, it’s as simple as saying that the narrative in no way comports with the data.

Respective to this timeline, there remain many unanswered questions:


Following Buffalo, Uvalde occurred but the most important aspects of both events are the bookends presented by Biden’s pretext on 07 April 22 pertaining to no constitutional amendment being absolute and targeting the Second Amendment with those words, and his 24 May 22 post-text where Biden displayed a pathetic and nauseating bit of crisis acting ramping up the emotional and hyperbolic rhetoric to target a class of weapons that represent but a sliver of overall gun crime and an even smaller sliver of actual gun homicides. It bears reiterating that the state-sponsored narrative does not comport with the actual statistical evidence and more accurately, there’s a universe of difference between them.

Here is Biden’s contrived and gut-wrenching crisis acting performance:

Buffalo and Uvalde are undeniably “bookended” by Biden’s pretext and post-text remarks, which deliver the ulterior objective – targeting a class of weapons that are entirely owned and maintained by law-abiding and responsible citizens except for a sliver of exceptions as evidenced by empirical data. Worse yet, those exceptions routinely bear all of the hallmarks of false flag operations.

Recalling that the Washington Post is the mouthpiece for the intelligence community and the CIA; and the work at Moonshine has both as the central features for the undoing of the Republic, here is WaPo fulfilling its tactical post-text role:


Everything is wrong. Nothing is right.

Unsurprisingly, the details of Uvalde bear all of the hallmarks of a false flag operation.

For one, the supposed “fog of war” dynamic created for the delivery of misinformation, disinformation and malinformation that resulted in a carrousel of explanations where premature reports were given only to be walked back with new information. Gone are the days of “reporting” when reporting didn’t occur until the facts were received and verified. “There is much we don’t yet know,” they always say. That’s not reporting. That’s soap opera fodder, aligned with psychological warfare and it serves a purpose. In a sense, you can’t “unring” a bell and the damage is done in the first iteration.


For another, the shooter Salvador Ramos, fired-off shots outside the building for no less than 12 minutes before he made entrance and the “media” and “law enforcement” gave conflicting reports about whether he was encountered or interceded on by law enforcement before entering.

As the Uvalde narrative was unrolled, questions were asked. Perhaps the most important question is whether Ramos was known to law enforcement. Unfortunately, it was a rhetorical question and the evidence made good on it.


As suspected and because it represents a replicating pattern for mass and school “shootings,” Ramos was known to law enforcement and moreover, his legal entanglements center on a threat four years beforehand where Ramos threatened to shoot-up a school once he turned 18. This bears down with full might respective to the threatening social media post depicted above. It all creates questions that law enforcement should be compelled to answer.


Making good on the critical question asked days earlier, the confirming answer to it was essentially a foregone conclusion before it was ever received [emphasis added],

Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) claimed on Friday that the gunman behind Tuesday’s shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, was arrested four years ago for threatening to shoot up a school.

SOURCE: Mediaite quoting Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX)

Questions for law enforcement:

  1. Was Ramos under surveillance or being monitored moving forward from the prior incident 4 years ago?
  2. Was Ramos referred to probation and did he have a probation officer at the time of the shooting?
  3. If Ramos was removed from presumed probation, why?
  4. If not, did the probation officer track his social media accounts?
  5. If not, why not?
  6. Did the probation officer concentrate on the period of his 18th birthday?
  7. If so, what was done and what were the findings?
  8. If not, why not?
  9. If so, what if any action or preemptive measures were taken respective to the precursory social media threat suggesting forthcoming harm to children as overlaid with his prior arrest and threat to shoot-up a school?
  10. If not, was that ever a question or concern?
  11. If it were not a question or concern, why wasn’t it in light of the prior threats?
  12. Was Ramos examined and surveilled in the run-up to and following his 18th birthday and if so, to what extent?
  13. What were the findings of that surveillance or monitoring?
  14. If not, why not?
  15. Was Ramos included on any local, county, state or federal law enforcement watch lists?
  16. If not, why not?
  17. If so, what actions and monitoring occurred in the run-up to the shooting as a result of his inclusion on those lists?
  18. Given Ramos’ prior arrest and threats to shoot-up a school upon turning 18 and given that all of this was known to law enforcement, how was Ramos able to procure his weapons?
  19. Was Ramos referred for mental health treatment?
  20. If not, why not?
  21. If so, who was the psychologist/psychiatrist/therapist and what are his/her areas of expertise?
  22. If so, was Ramos receiving mental health treatment in the run-up to the shooting?
  23. What was the role of the treating psychologist/psychiatrist/therapist around the time of Ramos’18th birthday and was there any concentration of efforts to be proactive and preemptive given his past threat and in the run-up to the shooting?
  24. If not, why not?
  25. What are the regulations, protocols, rules, etc. that determine how law enforcement manages known individuals who have made threats to execute public mass shooting, including for schools, on a specific timeline?
  26. If there are none, why is that?
  27. If they exist, was there abidance by them with fidelity respective to Ramos?
  28. If so, then how was Ramos able to carry-out this shooting?
  29. If not, why not?
  30. What do those regulations, protocols rules, etc. state specifically about what steps and measures should be taken specific to the particulars of Ramos’ history in the run-up to the shooting?
  31. Were they followed with fidelity?
  32. If not, why not?
  33. Given Ramos’ known history of threats, how was this shooting permitted to happen?
  34. What are the names of any and all law enforcement officers involved in any capacity with respect to Ramos during the timeline from a year before his first threat to shoot-up a school on his 18th birthday up to Ramos’ death?
  35. What are the exact details of each officers’ involvement in each instance from the above question?
  36. Were there any law enforcement officers officially assigned in some capacity as handlers or to monitor Ramos on this same timeline?
  37. If so, what are there names and what is the full account of activity in that capacity?
  38. If not, why not?

There are more questions for law enforcement as determined by headlines and additional acquired information.

One is based upon this headline: Uvalde Shooter Fired Gun For 12 Minutes Outside School Before Entering. This extract is from it:

The gunman who massacred 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary in Uvalde, Texas lingered outside for 12 minutes firing shots at people in a funeral home across the street, before scaling a fence onto school grounds where he fired more shots. He then entered the school and barricading himself in a classroom before opening fire, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Zero Hedge

Others are found in these headlines:

  1. BREAKING: Mother trying to save children at Uvalde was handcuffed by federal marshals
  2. Harrowing Uvalde Vids Show Screaming Parents Blocked From School as Kids Are Shot Inside

The details of the above two articles are left for your independent consumption as we move forward.

More problematic for these headlines is this compounding development delivered by pathetic and mealy-mouthed Texas Department of Public Safety Lt. Chris Olivarez:


The three aforementioned headlines and Olivare’s extraordinarily anemic and deeply disturbing and confounding statement collectively depict this contrived and apparently fabricated scenario as delineated below. It is underpinned by the facts that Uvalde only has a population of 15,217 according to the 2020 census and according to the “United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 7.6 square miles (19.8 km2)” [source].

  1. There was a 12-minute window to intercede on Ramos after he began shooting and before he entered the school; and that is overlaid by the fact that Uvalde is a smaller town that permits a faster response time for law enforcement [the first officer should have been on scene within a minute or two and well before Ramos breached the school]
  2. Armed and trained adult law enforcement officers bound by a constitutional oath made an informed decision not to enter the school building due to fears that they could be shot or killed and instead deferred to and permitted the shooting of unarmed children in ways that amount to an unmitigated slaughter
  3. When parents attempted to intercede on Ramos and prevent more death, those same law enforcement officers interceded on the parents using force and making arrests
  4. Those same law enforcement officers stood-down for over an hour as the slaughter was permitted to unfold unmitigated

This above scenario is further compounded by the following fact sets beginning with this headline: REVEALED: Uvalde school district was part of AI program that rooted out potential mass killers and monitored social media for threats and potential shooters. From it,

Texas school officials had been monitoring students’ social media prior to the deadly shooting in Uvalde Tuesday, it has been revealed – but still failed to pick up on concerning posts from the teenage gunman in the days leading up to the tragedy.

As an 18th birthday present to himself earlier this month, now-deceased suspect Salvador Ramos bought two AR-style rifles and paraded them on social media – including in ominous messages sent hours before the killing started.

The teen’s photo-op also saw him share an image to his since-scrubbed Instagram account, of him cradling the magazine of a rifle on his lap.


Uvalde School officials say they had been monitoring its students’ social media pages using an advanced AI-based service called Social Sentinel, designed to recognize signals of potential harm found in digital conversations.

The district revealed Monday it had been using the platform ‘to monitor all social media with a connection to Uvalde as a measure to identify any possible threats that might be made against students and or staff within the school district.’

Alex Hammer For Dailymail.Com

How did Ramos slip through the cracks unless he was permitted to slip through the cracks so Biden was positioned to make good on pretext and deliver the post-text remarks evidenced above? It’s awfully difficult not to view Ramos’ shooting through a lens framed by that question given the evidenced presented thus far.

Now consider this as outlined in my social media post below. As you do, note that the 21 Mar 22 Uvalde/active shooter training exercise post remains unverified as of the time of writing and additionally, the post has been taken down.

The other notation to make pertains to the direct violation of standing active shooter response protocols that call for law enforcement to “stop the active shooter as soon as possible;” not stand-down and arrest parents trying to assume their abdicated duties while permitting the unmitigated slaughter of defenseless children and faculty.

GAB/LINK [includes links for the next two images]

More questions for law enforcement:

  1. Is the 21 Mar 22 active shooter exercise information legitimate and valid?
  2. If so, did that exercise include any, some number or all of the law enforcement officers involved in the Ramos shooting?
  3. Who gave the order to stand-down in violation of established response protocols?
  4. Why would any responding law enforcement officers hesitate to implement their training and refuse to enter the building upon arrival?
  5. What was the exact time of the first call into 911 and what is the exact time that Ramos began shooting outside of the school?
  6. What was the exact time of the arrival of the first officer on the scene?
  7. Was the response time for on-scene arrival in any way delayed or slower than standard response times typical for Uvalde?
  8. If so, what accounts for it and why?
  9. If not, how was it that Ramos was still positioned to breach the school in the established 12-minute window?
  10. How was Ramos missed in advance respective to the AI program and what should have amounted to robust and appropriate monitoring or surveillance of Ramos in the run-up to his 18th birthday and eventual shooting?

More problematic to everything evidenced hereto, consider this as put forth by Tore Maras last evening as sourced from here Telegram account. The short of it pertains to OASIS Outback, LLC [Outback bar, restaurant and sporting goods store], which apparently lent money to Ramos before selling him his weapons pictured above. OASIS Outback, LLC apparently has received substantial funding from the Small Business Administration in the amount of $342,084.

In reference to the use of shell corporations, Maras contends that OASIS Outback, LLC “is also “WRK, Inc.,” and that federal contractors are implicated while duplicate loans appear to constitute fraud. These images are derived from Maras’ feed:

Respective to Uvalde’s small stature as a town, Maras further examines an anomalous and extraordinary flow of federal funds to various entities within it including billions to make F16 aircraft.

Maras states,

Maybe this is another production to prelude emotional tugs for guns.


for that SMALL TINY 20K resident TOWN

Tells you all you need to know

Tore Maras

Maras asks,

ULVADE TX doesn’t have F16 plants there does it?
Why is DHS paying for Road Repairs ?
What happened to Briscoe Farms?
Abbott did you know?

Tore Maras

To her point and in complete agreement with Maras,

Like I said STOP looking at the FALSE FLAG narratives and pics and and – look at the money..



You have everything you need.
Turn all the other FUCKERS off.


Look at the dates
Look at the amounts
Look at what money if POURING into a tiny tiny CITY.

TRILLIONS if not KAJILLIONS. do the math

Tore Maras

To examine Maras’ work laying-out the case against OASIS Outback, LLC and WRK, Inc.; and including the Maras quotes above, begin with this Telegram post and work your way down.

At this point, we are well within our right to proclaim Uvalde as another false flag operation and the evidence for that position is currently found in spades. That stack of evidence is only going to get taller moving forward.

Everything is wrong. Nothing is right. Uvalde is the latest perfect example and the money appears to validate and verify this beyond the full and evidenced fact sets above.

There is a distinct difference between what is happening to us and what is being done to us. Failing to discern that difference is a fatal error.

Everything is wrong. Nothing is right.

*This article is being continually updated with new developments here.



Leave a ReplyCancel reply