Yates’ Testimony Telling, Timely and Troublesome

06 AUG 20 (FORTY-THIRD article in a series)

Institutional preservation is unavoidable and err not when contemplating its gravity in matters akin to what we have all endured in the volatile, vitriolic and vicious geopolitical landscape of the past four years. Err not in considering whether it is an exceptionally clear prerogative for Attorney General William Barr, his Department of Justice and all of the acronymically lettered agencies beneath it, like the highly contentious and compromised Federal Bureau of Investigation. Err not in knowing that it always has and always will bear down to some degree. Understand that that’s the rub – it’s the institutions relative to the rule of law that afford us what we call a nation; or better yet, a constitutional republic; ergo the troublesome but critical directive of their preservation, which cuts like a double-edged sword.

Before we get into it, it’s important to note the importance of congressional hearings beyond the obvious. Most commonly and according to conventions, they facilitate oversight of important aspects of the federal government. All too often, though, they are exploited by politicians and witnesses to shape events and/or change history and if you’ve been paying attention to these hearings contemporaneously, you already know this. These angles become patently obvious by merely tuning-in and just paying attention. I RECLAIM MY TIME!

In many regards, Yates’ hearing was no different; save another obvious observation – Republican-led hearings are actually functional, considerate, polite and watchable as compared to the embarrassing post-2018 shit-show that has rendered the U.S. House of Representatives into the most corrupt and detestable political body in U.S. history. Go to hell. I digress.

The other piece that bears mentioning is Sally Yates’ involvement in the fateful 05 Jan 17 meeting with President Obama, James Comey, Joe Biden and Susan Rice. The same meeting that produced the infamous “by the book” email, contemplated the Logan Act, caused Joe Biden to contradict himself (read as get caught lying) and which will ultimately serve as pillar of evidence in the eventual prosecution of #Obamagate. The comprehensive timeline at the bottom of this article is helpful in understanding this monumentally critical meeting (that’s understated, by the way.)

Recall that institutional preservation is detrimental to fully remedying the totality of the ills plaguing our system of government writ large. We outlined these concerns in the shadows of post-election 2016 and have routinely revisited them, so when we see them reappear in the context of something like former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates’ Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, the position is only further galvanized. Simply stated, here’s the crux inherent in institutional preservation – it requires a balanced approach and by that a deliberate and precise one only excising a nominal amount of the metastasized cancer eating away at the entire body from within.

Rightfully, logically and for posterity’s sake, the last thing keenly informed Americans want to see right now and in light of the abundant and damning evidence is some limited remedy. Comprehending and acknowledging the anomalous historical significance delivered by the mid-January 2017 timeline (detailed below) and as bolstered by countless other instances of fraud and criminality derived from two Obama terms, Americans know full and well that a proper gutting is in order; replete with folks being adjudicated and sentenced accordingly for their crimes; no matter they be Obama, Clinton, Holder, Brennan, Comey, Clapper, and all of the other usual suspects we all know so well. A full and proper institutional gutting replete with heads on stakes is not only rightfully in order, but it’s demanded and the only appropriate remedy.

Those of us not relegated to being window-lickers and Kool-Aid drinkers are fully cognizant of the extent to which the entire federal apparatus was unconstitutionally and criminally leveraged against President Trump (see the definitions for sedition and treason.) Moreover, it has since matriculated to state and local governance courtesy of federalism as triggered by the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic, the engineered race riots and a fraudulently predicated and newfound but made-up American race war.

In other words, full exposure to severe legal jeopardy for all who were complicit and criminally culpable of treason and other high crimes is the only acceptable legal remedy given the totality of the evidence as it is known. Understand that that’s a pipe dream, though, for it would undo much of both chambers of Congress as well as an untold number of personnel within the broader institutions and entities and including leading directly to the previous occupiers (plural intentionally) of the Oval Office. Enter Yates and her testimony.

So what did we learn from the testimony of Sally Yates, who was the predecessor to Rod Rosenstein and occupied the number two seat at DOJ during the most important time span in United States history – the mid-January 2017 timeline? A lot. Much of it new. Much of it old. Much of it the same. All of it problematic at the highest order.

To summarize, here are some important takeaways:
– Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham devoted much time to revisiting his own assertions about Yates’ presumed insulation and lack of culpability in acknowledging that he believes she did not intentionally deceive the FISC.
– All of Yates’ testimony was predicated on two narratives that fall short of being factual: the contrived narrative about Russian election interference (the interference is real but just like everything else, the extent and impact of it is (being) greatly inflated for political purposes) and that the Russians ‘hacked’ their way to intel (Clinton emails) contrary to fact (see Seth Rich, Wikileaks, Julian Assange and the SDNY’s recent request to interview Assange relevant to both.)
– Yates used the word ‘rogue’ to describe the actions of then FBI director James Comey in his pursuit of the fraudulent investigation against Michael Flynn but not to describe him in a general sense (as we continue to shout, FLYNN FIRST!)
– Yates denied any knowledge at the time of Bruce Ohr’s overall involvement and his duplicitous role in funneling intelligence the perpetrators of all of this fraud and criminality.
– Despite it being detrimental to a falsely held notion by some Trump supporters, Yates accurately characterized and delineated the appropriate roles of prosecutors (Yates) germane to investigators (the FBI), which serves as the fact-finders and whereas Yates’ role is to accept the found facts in good faith and as sworn to in affidavits by the FBI’s investigators; meaning that as the DAG in signing and authorizing any warrant including Carter Page’s FISA warrant as predicated on the Steele dossier, she has no investigative onus there and it’s clearly not her role. Contrarily, does common sense not dictate that if one is investigating the President of the United states (candidate, President-elect or President), is should be incumbent upon them to validate every single fact to a degree of being water-tight before signing anything? Rhetorical question.
– In light of the above and despite the accuracy of her statement, Yates disavowed any onus to extend herself beyond routine and customary procedures (simply accepting the presented facts prima facie via the investigators) to further validate the found facts before taking action against the President of the United States.

Yates testified that she was fully unaware (by design or not; see plausible deniability considerations) as to the extent of apparent criminal wrongdoing that was occurring on her watch, within her purview, scope and jurisdiction, and beneath her feet given that she openly and willingly testified that she is responsible for every individual in the broader DOJ – literally everyone – except for the Attorney General himself. That’s right, she assumed the Rod Rosenstein position and that, in and of itself, begins to frame it all for us.

Despite moving forward on an historically unprecedented course that ultimately targeted the Trump administration from Mr. Trump’s candidacy through his inauguration and into his presidency, Yates took no further steps to extend herself beyond routine and ordinary measures to ensure the veracity and validity of the evidence – the infamous, patently fraudulent and contrived Steele dossier – that was being leveraged for the Carter Page FISA warrant and ultimately against Mr. Trump. Although she is technically accurate, someone with her long-tenured DOJ career, as she loves to tout, would certainly understand that the involvement of Mr. Trump was extraordinary and therefore required due diligence of an extraordinary manner and that would easily exceed routine and customary, no? Exactly. We can begin to hang our hat here.

Let’s now analyze what Yates’ testimony forebodes. When overlaying Yates’ and Rosenstein’s respective testimony, an emerging strategy begins to become apparent. Both witnesses served to shape testimony so as to compartmentalize the culpability within the overall federal apparatus. What does that mean? It means restricting blame to limited people within limited and closed areas. Referring back to our cancer example, we can view it this way. Although the cancer has metastasized throughout the entire body (federal apparatus), only a handful of tumors will be identified and excised and whereby the remainder of the infected body remains in question. It will be enough to hang some folks like Comey, Brennan, Ohr and others – so as to satiate some – but not enough to satiate those who comprehend the full scope of criminality.

Now, where the frustration really sets-in is when you realize that the justification and rationale for the compartmentalization is being driven entirely by completely false narratives that were mentioned in the opening. Additionally, within Yates’ testimony, she kept routinely deflected to having opened a “counter-intelligence” investigation versus a “criminal one.” This is a critically important point that we have enumerated on in the bulk of our work and because its demonstrative of their motives to circumvent constitutional protections.

There are two different thresholds for predicating an investigation depending on the nature of it – counter-intelligence or criminal. The criminal threshold is a more stringent one to meet as compared to the counter-intelligence threshold. Enter the importance and critical role of Mueller (the team, not the man.) What did the Mueller team do? They inherited Yates’ counterintel investigation and immediately laundered it into a criminal one – Mueller delivers CRIMINAL charges. Again, read that as completely circumventing Constitutional safeguards preventing unreasonable search and seizure and see it as a BASIC VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS in furtherance of sedition and treason. Period.

The remaining two analytical takeaways were this. Flynn First! Flynn’s case still remains the barometer for all things; he still remains their first and highest priority (read that as stands to inflict the greatest degree of damage to previous administrations); and they are doing everything they can (Contreras, Sullivan, amicus curiae, write of mandamus, en banc review, etc.) to delay and obfuscate this case so as to drag it past the election and prevent Flynn from rejoining Trump in any capacity. Lastly, in typical and predictable fashion, the Democratic senators used much of their time framing pretext for their eventual response to the landslide loss in 2020. What was the pretext? The ongoing, massive and severe RUSSIAN interference in our elections. There was much time spent delivering that precise Russian narrative (again.)

Before we go, understand the real angle here and this is a bit of a review. The play unfolding and the one to keep your eye on is more sleight of hand than mail-in ballot fraud to steal the election outright. Cleverly, it’s more subtle than that. Succinctly, mail-in ballot fraud will be used but maybe not to steal the election outright, but rather to jam it up and create the conditions necessary to effectively steal it. Once accomplished and the conditions are in place, the effort to steal it will manifest when Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats leverage continuity of government against an undetermined electoral result to justify removing President Trump from the White House. This would include Vice President Pence and guess who stands next in line as per continuity of government? Nancy Pelosi herself. She even reminded us of such in a recent interview included in the video linked below. It’s reasonable to expect this in the event the election can’t be determined before inauguration day and perhaps even sooner.

We have additional thoughts on where that may go and we will expand on those soon.

Here’s a quick video explaining the Pelosi plan as mentioned above and below that is Yates’ full testimony if you care to watch.

Here’s the Yates full testimony.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

Contents: Underlying Positions, Hypothesis, Team Update, Disclaimer, QAnon disclaimer, Timeline, Graphics

*Please find related graphics and images and the timeline at the bottom.

*If you are brand new, there are two recommendations as to where to begin catching-up and they are posted at the very bottom – one shorter than the other.

AN IMPORTANT NOTE ROOTED IN APPRECIATED READER FEEDBACK: Please consider that the Making the Case for Treason sub-series is deliberately much more granular and comprehensive and therefore more burdensome to consume. It is NOT presented for fast uptake like a Twitter thread. That would be grossly irresponsible and entirely inappropriate and inadequate given the implications, consequences and ramifications of what we are asserting herein. That said and for full understanding, these articles are recommended to be consumed old-school style: sitting down, uninterrupted, start to finish and repeated until understood.

By design, this isn’t causal reading. My prior experience as an investigator and history teacher drive the approach and it is one rooted in preparing summary findings reports detailing investigations used to prosecute, arbitrate, settle, dispute, litigate, etc. The work is comprehensive and the details are granular and that’s exactly how it should be – we’re MAKING the case, which rests between talking about it and prosecuting it. Generally, it’s a demonstration of why it should be prosecuted.

All said, if you care to understand HOW and WHY the entire nation was sold-out in the worst way, those details must be fully examined to be fully understood.

Underlying Positions

1. The ENTIRETY of the COVID-19 pandemic functions on a broader timetable dating back years and converges contemporaneously with Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine and impeachment, whereby all of the latter are sub-components serving the former, which it itself is a sub-component to a broader plan by decades.
2. The criminality and corruption we’re seeing isn’t new – it’s decades-old planning that’s coming to manifest now and extends from the same power bases as the 9/11 false flag political construct and other events.
3. Obama’s criminality dates back to the beginning of his first term when he entered office assigned with an agenda to map his counterinsurgency doctrine over the US to infiltrate all three levels of government: local, state and federal.
4. Obama has been and continues to run point for a broader Globalist operation deeply entangled with the Clintons, Soros, Gates and a host of others.
5. Everything unfolding from the President’s administration is the execution of a contingency plan that is calibrated to the 2020 election cycle. That election cycle becomes the immediate primary timeline over which all others are laid. We establish this because everything before and after it rests on the crux of 03 Nov 20 – election day. The other drivers here are the timeline underpinning Obama’s exit from office and its deserved severe scrutiny specific the events occurring late Dec to mid-Jan 2017.
6. Everything we are seeing play-out as responsive from the Trump administration to COVID-19 is not a reaction by any means. Rather it’s reflective of steps within a pre-constructed contingency plan that was based and devised from intelligence indicating that this unavoidable (POTUS has little control over what bad actors do within the borders of it chief military, economic and diplomatic rival in China) false flag political construct was imminent. With adaptations for real world and real time considerations, President Trump is currently executing that plan, not responding to a fake pandemic. Understand that these two things exist in different universes.
7. Observe the messaging and social programming (a very real thing!) – who wears masks and when do they wear them? Fauci and Birx, the true usurpers of the President’s emergency powers, wear them while the President’s people do not. Pay attention to other subtle cues – the messaging is evident. Observes the sights and sounds emanating from TV. Notice how the formula is all the same – pulling on emotional heart strings to elicit a dopamine drop to trigger brain chemistry and set to the same jingly, emotion-invoking music that parallels the sights and sounds of casino brain science. The same brain science that is being leveraged against the American people to literally brainwash them into believing that the only way to stay safe is to hunker down at home; out of fear and unable to humanely connect with other humans. In other words, it’s social programming to accept your digitally (and legally) enforced slavery. Wake-up and resist.
8. President Trump wagging Fauci in front of the cameras weeks ago to force him to correct the record and own that every time he and Birx asked for anything, the President gave it to them the first time every time. HARDLY ANYONE TALKS ABOUT THIS. He’s making them own their usurpation of emergency powers on live TV. Now you know why Fauci and Birx often appear so uncomfortable and agitate when exposed to the right information. There will come a day people point specifically to that moment in time and for good cause.
9. FLYNN FIRST! as covered comprehensively in the previous articles and manifesting currently with the constructive Lawfare Group/Judge Sullivan amicus curiae brief maneuver. Importantly, we content per work at CTH that was not unmasked but rather the subject of a FISA warrant before his attachment to the Trump administration. Flynn was the first prioritized target and as of this article, he remains not only that, but he’s locked, loaded and ready to fully reengage. The amicus stunt is the coup d’etat Hail Mary with likely other contingencies waiting when this fails as it ultimately will. Flynn’s deep and broad knowledge of the vast criminality at hand remains the most critical aspect and division point between the past and current administrations and Flynn as a man represents the entirety of their own undoing. FLYNN FIRST!

Hypothesis

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update/Team: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group. This team receives quite a bit of valuable information from the folks who read our articles and accordingly, we (I) give a special heartfelt hat tip to @Shazlandia, whom keeps me on my toes at all times; often inconveniencing herself to do it.

Disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon Disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

A Word on Intent: There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

Where to Start Catching-up: I have two shortcuts for new readers looking to catch-up and avoid reading from article one. The ninth article – IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW – served as a recapitulation as of 14 Mar 20. Alternatively, you could take a bigger shortcut and pick-up with CAUSE OF DEATH FOR SALE posted 12 Apr 20.

IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW

CAUSE OF DEATH – FOR SALE

CATALOG

VIDEO

GRAPHICS

13 JAN 17 PANDEMIC CONSTRUCT INSERTION

Figures 21-26: Leaked slides from the pandemic scenario insertion on 13 Jan 17 during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings:

TIMELINE

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT

The Flynn Timeline Insert

*Embedded images sourced from Conservative Treehouse, NBC News, Fox News and QAnon and open federal sources.

Conservative Tree House presents 5 distinct phases for context to the broader construct and they bear significant relevance here:

1. 12/2015 – 4/2016: “The first phase leading into ‘Spygate’ is the period of time where opposition research of the republican candidate field was taking place.  It is in this period where Fusion-GPS hired CIA Open Source researcher Nellie Ohr, wife of DOJ-NSD official Bruce Ohr, to do research.”

2. 4/18/2016 – 7/31/2016: “At the same time as NSA Director Mike Rogers discovered a significant and unauthorized uptick in FISA-702(16)(17) database queries, and subsequently blocked access (April 18th, 2016), candidate Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee for the presidential race.”

3. 8/1/2016 – 10/21/2016: “With the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane counterintelligence operation in full swing, the Obama intelligence community, the CIA, was conducting facilitating operations throughout.  In August 2016 CIA Director John Brennan brought the covert intelligence congressional oversight team known as the Gang-of-Eight into the picture.”

4. 10/21/2016 – 1/20/2017: “The FBI received their FISC surveillance authority two weeks before the November 8th presidential election.”

5. 1/20/2017 – present: this portion is too extensive to summarize fully and include – please click the original link. In general, “Here’s where the current background of multiple issues and questions begins to make sense.” Congress is unaware of “what is taking place within the ongoing counterintelligence operation against President Trump and all those around him.  Crossfire Hurricane, aka ‘Spygate’, is mostly invisible in the background. The need to put factual teeth behind a fraudulently created investigative predicate means the FBI needs to start getting serious about the investigative targets. “

Important: Pay attention for commentary in the image captions and elsewhere to give meaning as you progress.

-2014-

Nov ’14: Mifsud’s first association with London Centre of International Law and Practice Limited (LCILP)

-2015-

-Obama makes an apparent exception to existing policy by allowing Fauci to fund at $3.7m coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab expected of leaking the virus (SOURCE.)
October/November 2015 – Mifsud joins LCILP
22 May: Obama signs into law the new (JCPOA) Iran deal
Dec ’15: Flynn visits Russia participating in a diplomatic-styled event in Moscow celebrating the 10th anniversary of RT.

-2016-

Feb ’16: Papadopoulos’ Linked-In account states he joined LCILP
Mar ’16: Papadopoulos joins LCILP (conflicts with previous entry above) as head of the Centre for International Energy and Natural Resources Law & Security; create nexus between him and Mifsud; Papadopoulos emails Trump campaign offer to arrange a meeting – “Meeting with Russian Leadership – Including Putin”
06 Mar: Senior Trump campaign official advises Papadopoulos that improving Russian relations will be a priority
14 Mar: Papadopoulos-Mifsud meet for first time
18 Mar: Obama enacted Executive Order/Public Law 113-146 changing Kennedy-era law so as to augment the process and include pandemic preparedness into transitional meetings.
21 Mar: Via the Washington Post, Papadopoulos introduced publicly by Trump campaign as one of 5 foreign advisersMarch 24, 2016 – Papadopoulos meets female Russian national for first time (‘Putin’s niece’) via Mifsud
31 Mar: Papadopoulos attends national security meeting in DC with Trump and other advisors resulting in an effort to broker a meeting with Putin and the Russians
Apr ’16: Papadopoulos emails multiple progress reports regarding Russian meeting efforts
10-11 Apr: Papadapoulos and female Russian national email to arrange foreign policy trip
11 Apr: Mifsud emails confirming the arrangement in the previous entry
18 Apr: Via email, Mifsud introduces Papadopoulos to Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs contact
22 Apr: Russian MFA emails Papadopoulos; thanks him for extensive talks and proposes London meeting
25 Apr: Papadopoulos emails Trump campaign advising of open invitation for Trump to meet with Russians in London
26 Apr: Mifsud meets Papadopoulos in London hotel and claims to have damaging information on Clinton
27 Apr: Papadopoulos emails Trump campaign about “interesting messages” and a meeting where Russia would host Trump
30 Apr: Papadopoulos thanks Mifsud for his “critical help”
May ’16: Papadopoulos-Alexander Downer (AUS) meet to discuss damaging information on Clinton
04 May: Russian MFA emails Papadopoulos about open cooperation Trump meeting
05 May: Papadopoulos has phone call with Trump campaign and forwards Russian MFA email
13 May: Mifsud emails Papadopoulos about continuing to liaise between the Russians and Trump to schedule high-level meeting
21 May: Papadopoulos emails Trump campaign about Russians being eager to meet
01 Jun: Papadopoulos emails Trump campaign; referred to Campaign Supervisor about high-level Russian meeting
09 Jun: Trump Tower Meeting with Russians
Jul ’16: Bruce Ohr advises FBI/DOJ of potentially fraudulent nature of Steele dossier; Downer provides a tip about “Trump” to Australian intelligence (Five Eyes accord); Australia (Five Eyes accord) provides Downer “Trump” tip to US intelligence
18 Jul and before: Trump under surveillance
19 Jul: Papadopoulos, after ongoing communications with the Russian MFA contact, emails Trump campaign about surrogates attending the meeting if Trump is unable; Trump wins Republican nomination
Aug ’16: Bruce Ohr advises FBI/DOJ of potentially fraudulent nature of Steele dossier
15 Aug: Trump campaign advises Papadopoulos to make the Russian meeting trip if feasible (meeting did not take place)
September 2016 – Stefan Halper pressures George Papadopoulos on Russia in accusatory form
Oct ’16: FISA warrant application on Carter Page filedOct ’16: Mary McCord becomes AAG/DOJ/NSD replacing John Carlin
Dec ’16: Kushner facilitates meeting with Russians and Flynn, Sally Yates learns of Flynn investigation

Notable: Relative to the above – be prepared to hear revelations that Jared Kushner is somehow compromised. That is the emerging evidence and it suggests how the President’s enemies could have put the both him and Flynn at ease regarding interfacing with the Russians. Perhaps the President knew Kushner was compromised and played him, who knows? No matter he was assigned the Russia reset project by Trump. It seems that Kushner may have to answer some difficult questions soon. We’ll stay tuned to see if the dog will hunt.

31 Dec: Kislyak calls Flynn, conversation held

Notable: The previous Kushner meeting now takes on new meaning given that it facilitates a phone call between Russian Ambassador Kislyak and Flynn. We call that a set-up or pretext.

Move forward with tremendous and careful discernment as we encroach on the most important period of US history.

-2017-

Jan. ’17: Obama increases funding by $171m to the WHO as funded and controlled by Bill Gates and China (soured in housekeeping.)
Jan ’17: Obama sought funding cuts at the CDC, which would effectively interfere with pandemic preparedness and response (SOURCE): fiscal year 2015, $414 million cut year-over-year; fiscal year 2017 budget, looked to eliminate $251 million in CDC funding.
Jan ’17: The period of time Christopher Steele states that he deleted all of his Russian dossier files and contents
03 Jan: Trump and Flynn meet and discuss Russian matters, Mary McCord’s first knowledge of the case against Flynn, Loretta Lynch signs Obama’s new regulations for signals intelligence dissemination (SOURCE)

04 Jan: FBI doc 189-1 indicates that CROSSFIRE RAZOR surveillance (on Trump meeting with Flynn) resulted in no subject interview and closed the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE investigation.

05: Barack Obama, Susan Rice & Joe Biden extend a meeting privately to discuss doing investigations “by the book,” Susan Rice issued self-memorialized document meeting, Sally Yates first receives notice of the Flynn case.

See more

UNMASKING: The biggest scandal in American history is about to get some much needed exposure.

Rice: "I know NOTHING about this." pic.twitter.com/REIBkUnSWM

— thebradfordfile™ (@thebradfordfile) May 11, 2020

Notable: The day-by-day is remarkable here. To begin, Flynn and Trump meet on the 3rd and obviously the meeting was under surveillance because Flynn got to school sick and the 04 Jan report verifies it. Now, he’s sitting in class with Trump and ‘incidental collection’ is in play: A> B> C = A-C. It seems Barry and the boys were in on this conversation since Flynn’s warrant was active upon arrival; heard nothing but still moved forward. Consider where this went.

Two days following the meeting and the day after the dead-end report and Crossfire Hurricane closing, Obama, Biden and Rice extend a meeting privately. Immediately thereafter, Susan Rice issues a self-memorialization email to specifically frame “Russia” contextually relevant to Flynn, Trump and everything else. They did this AFTER knowing Flynn, Trump and Russia was a dead end. Again, see definition for treason.

Most critical to all things, this very moment in time is when Barack Hussein Obama galvanizes his foreknowledge to the entire false flag political construct into the permanent historical record. Thank you Susan.

At this point the ball game is on and everything else that follows is toward the eventual COVID-19 destination.

10 Jan: Buzzfeed publishes fraudulent Steel dossier tying back to John Brennan and his decision to launder the phone intelligence report by including it in the President’s Daily Brief, thus giving the suspected fraudulent dossier false instant credibility in the MSM.
11 Jan: Dr. Fauci publicly stated, “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)
12 Jan: The Carter Page FISA warrant was set to expire and required renewal
12 Jan: FBI verified via its sub-source that Steele dossier was fraudulent and was comprised of Russian disinformation (SOURCE), thus eliminating their primary predication for initial impeachment and any warrants to which the dossier may have been attached.
13 Jan: Earlier: MSM coordinated the leak of fraudulent Flynn/Russia so as to preempt the presidential transition meetings in which Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn was a participant
13 Jan: Later: Insertion point for the false flag viral pandemic political construct as occurring during compulsory and legally augmented Obama/Trump presidential transition meetings; thrust Fauci, Birx & WHO into roles.
15 Jan: Phase I China deal signed
24 Jan: FBI/Flynn interview, 302 drafted
January 27, 2017 – FBI interviews Papadapoulos for first time
31 Jan: (08 Nov – 31 Jan Flynn “unmasking requests” and parties making inquiries.

14 Feb: McCabe approves Flynn 302, Page and Strzok texts cite “Also, is Andy good with F 302?” and “Launch on f 302.”

Significantly Notable: TAKE NOTE OF THE FACT THAT THE 302 WAS WITTINGLY ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY MCCABE WITH THE WORD ‘DRAFT’ ATTACHED TO IT. This is deliberate for it creates a legal portal to file revised 302s later, meaning it also creates an avenue to literally change the story after the fact. Also significantly notable is the record of unmasking requests referenced against the varied list of requesting parties. Again, the timeline reveals the meaning – the purpose of the unmasking around the late Dec to mid-Jan timeline is to support the fraudulent case for Flynn being compromised by the Russians. This would be accomplished by leaking the findings publicly as a panicked Obama prepared to leave office with more loose ends than an splayed and frayed anchor rope.

15 Feb: Flynn 302 accepted, indicating Flynn’s invitation to the Russian GRU in 2013, which would have been authorized by Obama’s administration (set-up.)

Notable: Here we have the notorious Page and Strzok texts in support of the questionable 302; remembering that Strzok was the lead interviewing agent on the Flynn interview. Take note of the ‘draft’ marker below.

16 Feb: FBI-Papadapoulos interview #2
17 Feb: Papadopoulos deactivates his Facebook account circa 2005
February 23, 2017 – Papadopoulos ceases using his cell number and establishes a new one
May ’17: Zainab Ahmad attends Global Center on Cooperative Security event
08 May: Strzok and Page texts stating “F*CK! Clapper and Yates…playing into the ‘there should be an unmasking request/record’ for incidental collection, incorrect narrative.”

Significantly Notable: Here Strzok and Page discuss specifically CTH’s contention regarding Flynn as a subject relative to incidental collection. They identify incidental collection as the incorrect narrative meaning that Flynn was an subject for an active FISA warrant.

17 May: Robert Mueller named Special Counsel, Zainab Ahmad member of initial legal team

Notable: “Zainab Ahmad, a member of Mueller’s legal team, is the former Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York. As pointed out by Blackburn, Ahmad attended a Global Center on Cooperative Security event in 2017. In recent days, Blackburn wrote via Twitter: “Zainab Ahmad is a major player in the Russiagate scandal at the DOJ. Does she work for SC Mueller? She was at a GCCS event in May 2017. Arvinder Sambei, a co-director of the [London Centre of International Law Practice], worked with Joseph Mifsud, [George Papadopoulos] and [Simona Mangiante]. She’s a GCCS consultant.”

“Blackburn told this author: “Zainab Ahmad was one of the first DOJ prosecutors to have seen the Steele dossier. In May 2017, she attended a counter-terrorism conference in New York with the Global Center on Cooperative Security (GCCS), an organization which Joseph Mifsud, the alleged Russian spy, had been working within London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.”

31 May: Flynn 302 re-entered at FBI

Notable: The reentered Flynn 302 on 31 May (as noted in the image above) removed the ‘draft’ marker thus allowing for a retro-fitted change to the fact set. It was a deliberate maneuver or a set-up.

27 Jul: Papadopoulos is arrested
30 Oct: Papadopoulos pleads guilty
30 Nov: Flynn signs guilty plea as accepted by Judge Ruy Contreras

Notable: This juncture is important. Notice how Flynn’s signed confession occurs AFTER the ‘DRAFT’ 302 was accepted accepted and then refiled thus establishing a revised fact set. Further down, you’ll note were two revised 302s were inserted again after the fact. The word ‘draft’ was never ‘inadvertently’ anything rather deliberate the entire way. Nefarious and tedious!

Look where it goes. Look whom happened to sit on the FISA court, oversee the Flynn case and then recuse unexpectedly and without explanation. This is entirely reflective of two things: the jig was up and Contreras was in on defrauding of the FISA court upon which he sat. They removed him quietly so as not to rock the boat. Never interfere with an enemy in the midst of self-destruction. Rudy in hot water with the rest of them.

07 Dec: Judge Contreras recuses without explanation to be replaced by as corrupt Judge Emmet Sullivan.

12 Dec: New Flynn Judge Emmet Sullivan orders Mueller to surrender exculpatory (to Flynn’s benefit) to Flynn’s defense team

-2018-

31 Jan: Mueller orders delay in Flynn sentencing
14 Feb: Mueller requests that Flynn exculpatory evidence (of benefit to Flynn) to be sealed

Notable: Here Mueller is taking a deliberate step with Flynn’s due process by seeking to seal away known exculpatory evidence. That’s how traitors work.

08 May: President Trump abandons Obama’s (JCPOA) Iran deal
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
17 Jul: Mary McCord/James Comey meet re: 11/15/17 302 (?)

Notable: Come enters the picture with McCord and despite research, we’re unable to identify the subject for 15 Nov 17 302.

28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage
17 Dec: Judge Sullivan receives 2 filed redacted versions of Flynn’s original 302, as ordered and received from the undersigned Mueller and Brandon L. Van Grack.)

Sources:
https://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14189784/dan-coats-trump-director-of-national-intelligence-dni-russia VOX/ODNI highlight yellow quote
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/452945-memorable-moments-of-trumps-clashes-with-intelligence-director-dan

-End/Flynn Timeline Insert-

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown