Press "Enter" to skip to content


10 Apr 20 (TWENTY-EIGHTH article in a series)

Let’s go right to work and as we do, know that this article has been revised and re-posted so that the second part of the Barr/Ingraham interview can be captured in the same space. If you read the earlier version, the new video and commentary, which is spectacular, can be found beneath the first.

Here’s where the original article picks-back up:

Below are two videos worthy of everyone’s attention: Attorney General William Barr’s full interview with Larua Ingraham and a monologue from posted by Dr. Shiva Ayyafurai, MIT Phd. regarding his perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic, which essentially parallels much of the work in the ongoing COIVD-19 series.

Before we get into it, if you are new please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS including the hypothesis for our position at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

If you haven’t had the opportunity to take-in the last several articles, things have escalated in terms of the suspected levels of corruption and criminality coming from the President’s political enemies. Robust evidence now demonstrates the constructive elements of the predicament the President (and the nation and the globe) finds himself in while at the same time, explosive revelations are impacting the broader landscape as the FBI appears to have withheld from President Trump’s Department of Defense foreknowledge of the October 2019 COVID-19 outbreak, which the FBI even got 2 months before the World Health Organization did. How is that?

A word of caution here – don’t underestimate the ramifications of the above scenario. Distilled down, they are potentially landscape altering given that it resembles the FBI having violated its own operational directives in order to deprive the Department of Defense of critical national security intelligence, which happens to overlap FISA since one of the ancillary intelligence reports bears that marking, in order to preserve the effectiveness of a political construct inserted into President’ Trump’s incoming administration on 13 Jan 17. In other words, treason.

Let’s get to AG Barr’s interview because it’s telling. Commentary on the interview will follow.

To begin, take note of the classic Barr demeanor, which never seems to waver. I don’t know if he’s portraying, “We’re good, hold my beer, I got this” calm and cool or “Shit happens, yeah I’m concerned, but shit happens” calm and cool. I’m hoping and thinking it’s the former. Here’s the very worthy full interview:


The commentary here focuses on broader constitutional issues relative to the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on the aftermath.

Ingraham opens with concerns on the minds of every American and they are fundamental issues centered on basic, essential rights: freedom of worship, freedom of assembly, freedom of movement, etc. Barr appropriately replies introducing “balance” to the equation to mitigate “broad deprivations of liberty.” Reflecting to Federalism, Barr outlines his intent to oversee States relative actions. This all bodes well for Americans.

1:42- With Ingraham delves into a very nuanced but loaded question drawing the focus on local officials and authorities. Listen carefully as Ingraham introduces the topic within the context of religious gatherings and using a clip from NY Governor Andrew Cuomo. Cleverly, Ingraham is confronting Barr with evidence that local officials and authorities are overstepping Constitutional bounds and imposing their own brand of draconian measures. This is important because it speaks to the political constructs’ primary purpose, which is to transfer the President’s emergency powers away from him and into the hands of designated DSSG/MIC players like Birx and Fauci. This is an extension of that same lever playing-out at the local level. Invasion by infiltration, in other words.

Barr’s reply? Barr stands firmly and resolutely that the department will continue to mitigate encroachments by local authorities relative to appropriate and “necessary restrictions,” while pushing for alternative means for managing people in these types of scenarios.

3:23- Ingraham pushes Barr on the federal government’s restricting or eliminating Americans’ inalienable rights and again, Barr replies resolutely by saying, “that we have to be very careful to make sure… that the draconian measures being adopted are fully justified and that there are not alternative ways of protecting people.” Taking the nuanced interpretation, Barr is telling us that the department is aware of likely politically motivated overreach by Fauci and Birx germane to the devastating restrictions they imposed on the nation. Moreover, he reaffirms that the department will continue to weigh-in when local officials do overreach.

5:35- In an exchange regarding “war time” emergency powers and the “whole of government approach,” Ingraham provided significant clarity on the timing of the impact of the viral pandemic serving as the context for the political construct. She astutely indicates that normally during a “war time” scenario, both the USSC and Congress are in session but at this juncture, it’s only the Executive functioning. THINK ABOUT THAT. It speaks to the single most constructive element in all of this – that the President was intentionally left to his own to mitigate this pandemic. The pandemic is the rope. They intend to hang him with it, otherwise Congress would be in session DOING IT’S JOB TRYING TO PROTECT AMERICAN CITIZENS. Barr cleverly puts the ball back into Congress’ court acknowledging the stimulus bill and stating that they are welcome to adjust course and return to work.

Let’s interrupt the commentary to look at something I wrote last night. Here it is.

MOST IMPORTANT THING YOU’LL READ ALL DAY> Here’s the relevant question: With COVID-19 as the precedent, what will the next ‘crisis’ look like with an Obama-type in office?

6:28- Listen to Ingraham carefully as she questions Barr about PRECEDENT in consideration of “rule of law” applications during a declared emergency. For posterity’s sake, this question towers over all others. Barr’s reply speaks to President Trump’s strong executive approach that also accommodates flexibility and adaptability at the state level as aligned with Federalism, which serves as an inherent and systematic Constitutional protection; and in avoidance of the proverbial “slippery slope” that can parlay into extra-constitutional and unconstitutional encroachments.

9:30- As Barr segues from discussing border control as a way to remedy the spread of infectious disease stateside, listen carefully as he outlines yet another subtle but disastrous scenario placed in front of the President by previous corrupt and inept administrations. Specifically, Barr indicates the national security ramifications created by the virtual complete outsourcing of America’s medical supply production to China – our primary political, economic and military rival. That previous administrations let this escape us is criminal. Here are good questions to hammer home this point: 1) What would happen if China, which was/is making the bulk of coronavirus test kits, was intentionally sending test kits already contaminated with coronavirus? See Christopher Columbus, Native Americans, blankets and smallpox and 2) What if China simply refused to ship critical medical supplies?

10:05- Ingraham quetions Barr about China’s propaganda efforts and then turns to the China/US/Harvard bio-weapons smuggling scenario I’ve covered at length. Barr says, “The department is heavily engaged in that,” indicating the department’s high priority of protecting the nation against China in the realms of counterespionage and counterintelligence; also referencing the department’s “China Initiative.”

11:12- Barr directly confirms that China; not Russia, is the greater geopolitical threat “across the board.”

13:03- Ingraham questions Barr about Bill Gates’ intent to force mass vaccinations along with a “digital certificate” record of vaccination that Gates intends to make a micro-chip married to the actual vaccination. The digital certificate is a mechanism that would allow government to marginalize non-vaccinated citizens use it as the basis to deny services, entry, participation, etc. in essential societal functions (modern day serfdom, slavery, whatever you care to call it.) This is significant because Ingraham is confronting Barr on a fundamental aspect to the entire political construct. Again, Barr responds with his concern for the “slippery slope” encroaching on individual liberties and rights. Ingraham pushes Barr with another Gates quote and again, Barr revisits his long-term projected concern for the erosion of rights.

14:16- Ingraham and Barr discuss partisan aspects of the COVID-19 response; with Barr appropriately defending the President’s leadership.

15:46- Ingraham questions Barr about the likelihood of forthcoming civil unrest in the event restrictions do not ease soon. Barr acknowledges that it’s a legitimate concern and reiterates the need to open back-up both the economy and society in general; outlining the ramification of having a “cure” that is “worse than the disease.”

18:44- As it relates to the Second Amendment, Barr reaffirms that the federal government has agreed that gun stores are essential and therefore should remain open during times of emergency. Ingraham astutely follows-up with a retort about the Left’s intention to use the pandemic to reshape American society in their own view.

Here is where the new material (Barr/Ingraham) has been inserted and with the original Dr. Ayyadurai video still below.


The second interview segment opens with Barr confirming that they will take a pragmatic and conventional approach to managing the nation’s prison inmate population as it relates to potential releases. But then it gets very, very interesting.

1:40- Pay very close attention here because I believe that Barr tips his hand as he begins to discuss how USDOJ can actually multi-task and manage more than one matter at a time. Off-script in a seemingly impromptu moment in replying back to Ingraham, Barr states that USDOJ is able to “handle different kinds of cases.” Fair enough but listen to the direction that Barr takes it in his own word choice and with an uptick in energy from his normally reserved and patented monotone delivery. Barr quips, “Uh, maybe fraud is not on the top of their mind but we still police fraud. It’s very interesting because drugs kill 70,000 Americans a year – “seventy THOUSAND a year.”

Understand what Barr has done here and it’s genius in my honest opinion; flipping the entire construct on its head for the American people. As I write, the current US death toll is a fraudulent 19,701; and labeled as fraudulent due to the ongoing and highly suspicious manipulation of cause of death declarations (see the framing memo below.

Here’s the play – Barr takes the impetus for the lock-down (death rate) and blows it up implicitly relative to the COVID-19 death rate, which is measly by historic pandemic numbers. Barr has essentially stated live in front of an national (global) audience, “Hey, you’re slaughtering me in the press over drug interdiction efforts that KILL 70,000 Americans per year and you SHUT DOWN THE COUNTRY AND THE ECONOMY FOR 19,701 DEATHS,” and that, Ladies and Gentleman, is called FRAUD.

Here’s is the COD memo again before with conclude with the balance of Barr’s remarks.

3:13- Barr confirms that President Trump “did the right thing” in removing OIG Intelligence IG Michael Atkison for cause, citing decisions made to funnel intelligence directly to Congress with no Executive oversight.

4:11- Ingraham directly asks Barr about US Attorney John Durham’s video and Barr, stating a report will be a bi-product of his primary responsibility, which is to bring people to justice for abuses should they be demonstrated. Importantly, Barr cites the “sprawling” nature of cases like these and they take time to build.

Barr’s “own view” is that the department is not dealing with sloppiness, errors, mistakes or oversight, but an intentional pattern of actions with intent to “SABOTAGE the presidency” stating that, “If people broke the law and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.” Barr comments on the false predication for opening an investigation on the President’s then campaign and the pattern of apparent criminal resistance that followed him into the White House.

Barr offers that any FISA “misconduct will be discovered and discovered fairly promptly…” and concludes saying that “they” undercut the FBI in abusing the FISA process and will be prosecuted; assuring FISA safeguards moving forward.

The new material ends here and the original article picks-up again.

Here is Dr. Ayyadurai’s video presented in full and without commentary. It is worthy of a full viewing and please note that the monologue ends at 42:15 for questions.


If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)


Leave a ReplyCancel reply