Here’s an interesting drop from QAnon that I found a while back and have been meaning to share; assuming others haven’t already, and it may even be more meaningful now with additional evidence since accumulating – evidence that indicates a nefarious political angle behind COVID-19. For deeper understand there is a recent ‘update’ style article HERE
and an entire 26-article catalog HERE.
The post we’re examining is #3727 and it was posted on 18 Dec 19. For perspective on timing relative to that date, here is a timeline and as sourced in this article HERE,
11 Jan 17: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)
13 Jan 17: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment mgrs., engrossment ceremony
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump
So, as you can see, this post occurred on the same day that the full House decided to impeach the President and just before the initial (the date was later revised backwards to 17 Nov 19) first report of the COVID-19 outbreak, which was 27 Dec 19; conveniently two days after Christmas.
It’s important to note – critical to note – that at this time Nancy Pelosi presumably knew of the COVID-19 outbreak by means of an FBI tactical intelligence report, which happened to have attached to it an ancillary intelligence report marked FISA; and linked to Harvard University, Chinese foreign nationals and the smuggling of bioweapons. Oh yeah, it’s a scene, man. You can learn more about the the bioweapons smuggling and the intelligence report in this article HERE
In all of this, it’s also important what I wrote about the,
…profoundly and astonishingly inadequate and incompetent performance of Nancy Pelosi in her failed and fraudulent impeachment of President Trump. Those are not exaggerations or embellishments. Even the most rudimentary scholar of civics understands that the US House of Representatives bears the sole constitutional onus to fully investigate and subsequently compile a complete case before transmitting the requisite Articles of Impeachment to the US Senate. That same scholar would also know that only the US Senate bears the sole constitutional onus of functioning as the court for the impeachment trial; understanding that investigatory aspects to any case are in no way a function of any court; rather such duties belong to law enforcement, prosecution, defense and, in this case, a designated federal body in the US House and the authority of its committees and their oversight responsibilities. (SOURCE)POLITICAL MOONSHINE
So that’s the backdrop – let’s get to the post with EMPHASIS ADDED. As we do, our objective is to extract a timeline and it’s a potentially telling one:
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 6d572c No.7555466
It must be done right.
It must be done according to the rule of law.
It must carry weight.
It must be proven in the court of law.
There can be no mistakes.
Good things sometimes take time.
Attempts to slow/block the inevitable [Justice] will fail.
[D]s election interference 2016.
>Clinton/Hussein illegal FISA
[D]s election interference 2018.
[D]s election interference 2020.
These people are sick.
We, the People, are the cure.
Here’s the rationale and interpretation. The President has a knack for being vindicated after being attacked for making initially accurate statements like the one’s he’s made about hydroxychloroquine; and which could be indicative of foreknowledge. For the sake of our purposes here, we’ll assume it is.
Now look at the introduction to the post speaking to doing it right, taking time, ensuring ability to prosecute, making no mistakes, etc. In the context of what people say is going on now (rumors of people being rescued from tunnels) and everything that’s occurred before it, that’s heavy stuff on a universal scale. Quite a foreboding introduction to that post.
Consider the timeline that can be extracted from this post; even if it requires rearranging and organizing:
-2016 election interference
-Obama/Clinton FISA abuse
-Attempts to block justice (all of the law suits, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment, etc.)
-2018 midterm election interferrence
–PEOPLE ARE SICK
–WE (POTUS) ARE THE CURE (HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & LIKELY OTHERS)
Pretty interesting, huh; especially since I’ve written 26 articles about how COVID-19 is a false flag political construct? Pretty interesting that this specific timeline was presented to us on the very same day that Nancy Pelosi’s full U.S. House of Representatives decided to impeach the President, huh?