29 Mar 20 (TWENTY-FIRST article in a series)
Nancy Pelosi made explicit remarks that I will share with you below, which move her into a dangerously binary position where she finds herself either as equally responsible (or more so) for the domestic outbreak of COVID-19 as what she’s alleged for the President -or- she wittingly engaged in a political construct involving COVID-19. Here’s the exact evidence we need to demonstrate this and it comes from none other than Nancy Pelosi herself.
Before we get into it, if you are new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.
As a quick review before we get into it,
Again, our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in the know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics.POLITICAL MOONSHINE
First, I’ll draw your attention to Nancy rolling-out her new and best Dr. Birx impersonation as she’s ditched her former and more contemporary hairstyle for an older; perhaps more senior and motherly one; and at the same time she chose to don her revolutionary purple. This appears like Nancy remaking herself as the country foolishly becomes enamored with Deep State asset Dr. Deborah Birx. Nonetheless, Pelosi’s remarks were of poor etiquette, inappropriate and vicious.
Before we can look at the evidence, we have to establish the basis for our premise and it’s rooted in the level of intelligence that the Speaker of the House receives and its similarities to what the President receives.
Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House – we all know that. Well, as Speaker of the House, she’s privy to classified intelligence briefings and here’s how.
Pelosi’s position as Speaker of the House makes her an ex officio member of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which is chaired by Adam Schiff, D-CA. Accordingly, “The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence oversees the nation’s intelligence agencies including components of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, State, Treasury and Energy” (SOURCE). With oversight authority comes access to intelligence briefings; including the sort the President would have received as reported below by the Washington Post. Clearly anything that could manifest as a global viral pandemic would have been front and center in such classified briefings; the likes to which Nancy Pelosi ought to have – did have – essentially unfettered access. (SOURCE)
Consider what the CIA has to say about Pelosi’s ex officio status specifically germane to the sharing of intelligence (EMPHASIS mine) (SOURCE),
The leadership in each chamber–the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate and the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives–are ex officio members of their respective intelligence committees and have access to intelligence held by the committees. Typically, a member of each leader’s staff serves as liaison to the intelligence committee, keeping up with the committee’s activities and serving as a conduit for information to his or her boss. Each of these Congressional leaders also has staff responsible for national security issues who can make independent requests to the Intelligence Community for support–which may include briefings and/or written analysis. While Congressional leaders rarely have time to get involved in intelligence matters themselves, there are exceptions. Speaker Newt Gingrich, for example, has made a point of scheduling regular meetings with the DCI to cover substantive as well as operational matters.CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Here it is in one shot – Speaker Pelosi bore the onus to ensure that she either received or requested any appropriate classified briefings that could impact the country in such drastic ways relative National Security and a host of other sensitive areas; and if she did not then she bears full responsibility for it.
Consider what the Washington Post – the CIA’s mouthpiece – wrote here nine days ago (EMPHASIS mine), (SOURCE)
U.S. intelligence agencies were issuing ominous, classified warnings in January and February about the global danger posed by the coronavirus while President Trump and lawmakers played down the threat and failed to take action that might have slowed the spread of the pathogen, according to U.S. officials familiar with spy agency reporting.
The intelligence reports didn’t predict when the virus might land on U.S. shores or recommend particular steps that public health officials should take, issues outside the purview of the intelligence agencies. But they did track the spread of the virus in China, and later in other countries, and warned that Chinese officials appeared to be minimizing the severity of the outbreak.
Taken together, the reports and warnings painted an early picture of a virus that showed the characteristics of a globe-encircling pandemic that could require governments to take swift actions to contain it. But despite that constant flow of reporting, Trump continued publicly and privately to play down the threat the virus posed to Americans. Lawmakers, too, did not grapple with the virus in earnest until this month, as officials scrambled to keep citizens in their homes and hospitals braced for a surge in patients suffering from covid-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus.WASHINGTON POST
Dear President Trump – A comet, like the one that many say caused the dinosaurs to go extinct, is going to hit the earth again in the future. We don’t know when or where and we don’t know what to do about it but if it happens, it’s going to be your fault. That’s absurd, right? Go back-up and re-read the WaPo trash – it’s the same ridiculous claim and WaPo, being the CIA’s longstanding mouthpiece (NYT serves the DOJ, FBI, etc.), even goes so far as to do all of the thinking for it’s Kool-Aid drinking audience when it decided that the matters should be “taken together.” I digress and let’s get back to it.
Did you notice how WaPo conveniently omitted all mention of the information I outlined above about intelligence sharing and the Speaker’s onus therein? Do you think WaPo’s omission was an accident? Do you think that such CIA-controlled narrative happens by chance or rather because it’s a function of a broader political construct and serves a specific purpose? Those are rhetorical questions for me.
Let’s get to Nancy’s comments – here’s the first clip:
Here’s the second clip:
Yeah, folks. That’s your Speaker of the House blaming President Trump directly for the lost lives of American COVID-19 victims; and with “blood on his hands.” (Insert my intense rage and copious profanity HERE.)
Let me remind you of what President Trump was dealing with as COVID-19 unfolded and it’s precisely why I’m contending that the hypothesis I outlined above can be supported by arranging elemental evidence in a certain way. It includes how and why impeachment’s primary purpose was to throw cover to COVID-19, which was the apparent and true long-run objective.
Below is an extract (segment of a longer timeline) from a previous ARTICLE that overlays three relevant timelines: Trump’s active COVID-19 response, the WHO and impeachment. It will give you a sense of the flow and sequence of the precise time-frame for which Speaker Pelosi chose to criticize the President. You’ll also see that it captured my relevant notes in the extract to give you a little extra context.
DECEMBER 18: HOUSE VOTES TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP
DECEMBER 25: CHRISTMAS – MAJOR HOLIDAYS ARE OFTEN UTILIZED FOR SCHEDULED EVENTS DUE TO THE GENERAL PREOCCUPATION OF MOST PEOPLE
Note 2/11: As is often the case, the announcement of the first case of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China is made in the cloud of the Christmas and New Year’s holidays; at a time when global travel is highest; and AFTER impeachment is formally in place (the vote was 18 Dec.) Timing and sequence are critical. Also notable and a little further down is that on 14 Jan, just as impeachment was being formalized, the WHO claims that human-to-human transmission is not a concern.
DECEMBER 27: COVID-19 INITIAL FIRST REPORT IN WUHAN, CHINA (SINCE REVISED BACKWARDS TO 17 NOV 19)
December 31: China reports the discovery of the coronavirus to the World Health Organization.
JANUARY 5: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:
Based on information provided by national authorities, WHO’s recommendations on public health measures and surveillance of influenza and severe acute respiratory infections still apply.
WHO does not recommend any specific measures for travellers. In case of symptoms suggestive of respiratory illness either during or after travel, travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their healthcare provider.
WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the current information available on this event.
January 6: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a travel notice for Wuhan, China due to the spreading coronavirus.
January 7: The CDC established a coronavirus incident management system to better share and respond to information about the virus.
JANUARY 10: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:
While the cause of the pneumonia seems to be a novel coronavirus, transmission potential and modes of transmission remain unclear. Therefore, it would be prudent to reduce the general risk of acute respiratory infections while travelling in or from affected areas (currently Wuhan City) by:
– avoiding close contact with people suffering from acute respiratory infections;
– frequent hand-washing, especially after direct contact with ill people or their environment;
– avoiding close contact with live or dead farm or wild animals;
– travellers with symptoms of acute respiratory infection should practice cough etiquette (maintain distance, cover coughs and sneezes with disposable tissues or clothing, and wash hands).
International traffic: no restrictions recommended
WHO does not recommend any specific health measures for travellers. It is generally considered that entry screening offers little benefit, while requiring considerable resources. In case of symptoms suggestive to respiratory illness before, during or after travel, the travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their health care provider. WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the information currently available on this event.
January 11: The CDC issued a Level I travel health notice for Wuhan, China.
Note 3/11: Just as impeachment is formalized with the announcement of impeachment managers, the WHO issues a statement communicating that it has no concerns about human-to-human transmission, which is peculiar given its robust understanding of the very nature of coronavirus strains.
JANUARY 14: WHO DECLARES NO HUMAN-TO-HUMAN TRANSMISSION CONCERNS
Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China
JANUARY 15: HOUSE VOTES ON IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS
JANUARY 15: ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FORMALLY TRANSMITTED TO SENATE
JANUARY 16: ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FORMALLY RECEIVED IN SENATE
January 17: The CDC began implementing public health entry screening at the 3 U.S. airports that received the most travelers from Wuhan – San Francisco, New York JFK, and Los Angeles.
Note 4/11: This juncture is critical. Once again and on precisely merging vectors we have President Trump’s Articles of Impeachment being formally received in the Senate; with votes on trial rules occurring the next day, converging on the same day that COVID-19 emerges in the US for the fist time.
January 20: Dr. Fauci announces the National Institutes of Health is already working on the development of a vaccine for the coronavirus.
January 21: The CDC activated its emergency operations center to provide ongoing support to the coronavirus response.
JANUARY 21: SENATE VOTES ON TRIAL RULES
JANUARY 22: SENATE TRIAL / PROSECUTION OPENING ARGUMENTS
Now recall what I wrote previously about the peculiar nature of Pelosi’s brand of impeachment because it’s critical in seeing the broader picture here (EMPHASIS mine),
We have to give attention to some aspects that affect our lens in all of this. Our first item is rooted in the profoundly and astonishingly inadequate and incompetent performance of Nancy Pelosi in her failed and fraudulent impeachment of President Trump. Those are not exaggerations or embellishments. Even the most rudimentary scholar of civics understands that the US House of Representatives bears the sole constitutional onus to fully investigate and subsequently compile a complete case before transmitting the requisite Articles of Impeachment to the US Senate. That same scholar would also know that only the US Senate bears the sole constitutional onus of functioning as the court for the impeachment trial; understanding that investigatory aspects to any case are in no way a function of any court; rather such duties belong to law enforcement, prosecution, defense and, in this case, a designated federal body in the US House and the authority of its committees and their oversight responsibilities.POLITICAL MOONSHINE
What other explanation is there for why Pelosi’s pathetic impeachment was so weakly based and predicated and while at the same time, so grossly mismanaged? There isn’t a viable one that I can think of inside the scope of pragmatism, logic, and common sense.
Therefore, I’m contending that when you overlay the timelines and see the exchanges – moves and countermoves, if you will – the delay, mismanagement and peculiarity of the impeachment begins to take on clarity if you are willing to examine it through a lens that makes those characteristics deliberate outcomes. Deliberate outcomes that were designed to throw cover to a grander and entirely more effective but nefarious construct; no matter it be their original long-run objective, their Hail Mary or their contingency plan. That detail doesn’t matter because it worked flawlessly. Just go look outside.
It seems Nancy dragged impeachment along with her bizarre mismanagement because the timeline converges perfectly with the COVID-19 timeline and all the while the WHO’s (Bill Gates and China funded and controlled) odd but similar mismanagement of COVID-19 snakes through the very middle of it. But I’m sure that’s just a coincidence, huh?
Evidence suggests bio-engineered aspects to a virus that likely escaped a lab in Wuhan and therefore didn’t occur organically. Moreover, the entirety of the situation has been propagandized, leveraged and subject to misinformation and disinformation; much of that courtesy of China, the WHO and the MSM (none of those entities being friends of the American people.) Meanwhile, the response has been entirely disproportionate relative to history and other similar viral outbreaks. But I’m sure that just a coincidence, huh?
A simple man with common sense and a reasonable acumen for logical deduction might just say that the whole fake, shitty impeachment that EVERYONE knew was fake and shitty had to serve another purpose. He might conclude that TIMING tells us what we need to know; as does the money – they always do. He’d likely conclude in saying that said purpose was throwing cover to COVID-19.
Let’s get back to Nancy to close. She’s forced herself into one of two positions that are counter to one another and with no middle ground to be had in between. Ergo, Speaker Pelosi either a) is no more culpable for the outbreak of COVID-19 than the President because she had access to the same intelligence briefings and did nothing with that information – OR – b) wittingly ignored those same intelligence briefings so as not to detract from what now appears to be cover for the insertion of the COVID-19 political construct; said cover being her fraudulent and unconstitutional impeachment of President Trump.
She does not reserve the right to land in the middle of those two positions and we can no longer be tolerable of “explaining away” inconvenient fact sets. Moreover, if she doesn’t retract her statements and issue an apology to both the President and the American People, she should be put squarely and immediately into the other corner and if you ask me, not only is that where she belongs; it’s where she’s been this entire time.
If high-profile political targets are in-line to receive criminal indictments, I’d put chips on Pelosi (and her band of ‘Merry Miscreants.’)
Don’t listen to me say this is all a political construct, though, rather listen to Nancy. She told you everything you need to hear.
If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.
28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.
Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.
There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.
At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)