(FIFTEENTH article in a series) Since evidence suggests that we are sitting plumb in the middle of the next 9/11, which is ushering-in the latest version of the ‘new normal,’ let’s just get right to it.
To begin, if this is your first read from me on this topic, please start with the ‘HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS’ at the bottom, otherwise you’re jumping into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight. In the search for more evidence in support of my hypothesis (see work linked below which includes 14 previous articles and two more I can’t seem to finish), I often look backwards. In that light, I revisited a DOJ press release from 28 Jan 20 that was also linked by QAnon.
For context and in short, my hypothesis asserts that COVID-19 is a political construct that was inserted into the incoming Trump administration by the outgoing Obama administration during compulsory transition meetings on 13 Jan 17; and as part of a broader Globalist agenda to remove President Trump and/or undo his historic administration; and which included actually releasing the virus strain in Wuhan, China.
Let’s revisit some important dates:
Second – the first reported US case of COVID-19 was 19 Jan 20: SOURCE
Third and most importantly – the initial reporting on the first case in China, from which the current timeline was revised backwards, is 27 Dec 19. The sourced information below demonstrates the revised timeline that is critical in terms of understanding how the historical epidemiology is possibly being changed to potentially align with the timeline of a political construct. Consider this information sourced HERE,
In a report by Zhu and colleagues, investigators with the China CDC describe three adults who were admitted to a hospital in Wuhan on December 27, 2019; the two patients for whom clinical information was available had pneumonia. One of the patients died and the other two recovered. 2019-nCoV was detected in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens by whole-genome sequencing, direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and culture. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the virus falls into the betacoronavirus genus, which besides SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV also includes a bat SARS-like coronavirus.NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
With what is outlined above, we’ll throw-out the revised timeline marker date and use the remaining two as bookends to our argument: 27 Dec 19 (first report of COVID-19 in China) and 19 Jan 20 (first report of COVID-19 n US.)
Now, let’s consider the 28 Jan 20 DOJ press release, which I have reproduced in full and with EMPHASIS ADDED (SOURCE).
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.
Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was arrested this morning and charged by criminal complaint with one count of making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement. Lieber will appear this afternoon before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler in federal court in Boston, Massachusetts.
Yanqing Ye, 29, a Chinese national, was charged in an indictment today with one count each of visa fraud, making false statements, acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy. Ye is currently in China.
Zaosong Zheng, 30, a Chinese national, was arrested on Dec. 10, 2019, at Boston’s Logan International Airport and charged by criminal complaint with attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China. On Jan. 21, 2020, Zheng was indicted on one count of smuggling goods from the United States and one count of making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements. He has been detained since Dec. 30, 2019.
Dr. Charles Lieber
According to court documents, since 2008, Dr. Lieber who has served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialized in the area of nanoscience, has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD). These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities. Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017. China’s Thousand Talents Plan is one of the most prominent Chinese Talent recruit plans that are designed to attract, recruit, and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security. These talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information. Under the terms of Lieber’s three-year Thousand Talents contract, WUT paid Lieber $50,000 USD per month, living expenses of up to 1,000,000 Chinese Yuan (approximately $158,000 USD at the time) and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT. In return, Lieber was obligated to work for WUT “not less than nine months a year” by “declaring international cooperation projects, cultivating young teachers and Ph.D. students, organizing international conference[s], applying for patents and publishing articles in the name of” WUT.
The complaint alleges that in 2018 and 2019, Lieber lied about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Plan and affiliation with WUT. On or about, April 24, 2018, during an interview with investigators, Lieber stated that he was never asked to participate in the Thousand Talents Program, but he “wasn’t sure” how China categorized him. In November 2018, NIH inquired of Harvard whether Lieber had failed to disclose his then-suspected relationship with WUT and China’s Thousand Talents Plan. Lieber caused Harvard to falsely tell NIH that Lieber “had no formal association with WUT” after 2012, that “WUT continued to falsely exaggerate” his involvement with WUT in subsequent years, and that Lieber “is not and has never been a participant in” China’s Thousand Talents Plan.
According to the indictment, Ye is a Lieutenant of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the armed forces of the People’s Republic of China and member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). On her J-1 visa application, Ye falsely identified herself as a “student” and lied about her ongoing military service at the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), a top military academy directed by the CCP. It is further alleged that while studying at Boston University’s (BU) Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering from October 2017 to April 2019, Ye continued to work as a PLA Lieutenant completing numerous assignments from PLA officers such as conducting research, assessing U.S. military websites and sending U.S. documents and information to China.
According to court documents, on April 20, 2019, federal officers interviewed Ye at Boston’s Logan International Airport. During the interview, it is alleged that Ye falsely claimed that she had minimal contact with two NUDT professors who were high-ranking PLA officers. However, a search of Ye’s electronic devices demonstrated that at the direction of one NUDT professor, who was a PLA Colonel, Ye had accessed U.S. military websites, researched U.S. military projects and compiled information for the PLA on two U.S. scientists with expertise in robotics and computer science. Furthermore, a review of a WeChat conversation revealed that Ye and the other PLA official from NUDT were collaborating on a research paper about a risk assessment model designed to decipher data for military applications. During the interview, Ye admitted that she held the rank of Lieutenant in the PLA and admitted she was a member of the CCP.
In August 2018, Zheng entered the United States on a J-1 visa and conducted cancer-cell research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston from Sept. 4, 2018, to Dec. 9, 2019. It is alleged that on Dec. 9, 2019, Zheng stole 21 vials of biological research and attempted to smuggle them out of the United States aboard a flight destined for China. Federal officers at Logan Airport discovered the vials hidden in a sock inside one of Zheng’s bags, and not properly packaged. It is alleged that initially, Zheng lied to officers about the contents of his luggage, but later admitted he had stolen the vials from a lab at Beth Israel. Zheng stated that he intended to bring the vials to China to use them to conduct research in his own laboratory and publish the results under his own name.
The charge of making false, fictitious and fraudulent statements provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of visa fraud provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of acting as an agent of a foreign government provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of conspiracy provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of smuggling goods from the United States provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling; Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Boston Field Division Joseph R. Bonavolonta; Michael Denning, Director of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Boston Field Office; Leigh-Alistair Barzey, Special Agent in Charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Northeast Field Office; Philip Coyne, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; and William Higgins, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Export Enforcement, Boston Field Office made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorneys B. Stephanie Siegmann, Jason Casey and Benjamin Tolkoff of Lelling’s National Security Unit are prosecuting these cases with the assistance of trial attorneys William Mackie and David Aaron at the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.
The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
These case are part of the Department of Justice’s China Initiative, which reflects the strategic priority of countering Chinese national security threats and reinforces the President’s overall national security strategy. In addition to identifying and prosecuting those engaged in trade secret theft, hacking and economic espionage, the initiative will increase efforts to protect our critical infrastructure against external threats including foreign direct investment, supply chain threats and the foreign agents seeking to influence the American public and policymakers without proper registration.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRESS RELEASE
Let’s now take our previous dates and see where the most important date in the DOJ press release inserts:
- ***09 Dec 19: Evidence of Chinese spies smuggling “vials of biological research” to Wuhan
- 27 Dec 19: First report of COVID-19 in China
- 19 Jan 20: First report of COVID-19 n US
From the same press release, let’s consider which agencies assisted (EMPHASIS MINE):
- Assistant Attorney General for National Security
- FBI Boston Field Division
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Defense Criminal Investigative Service
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Office of Inspector General
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- Office of Export Enforcement
- DOJ National Security Unit
- National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section
Those are heavy-hitting agencies for “biological research;” in fact, those are the types of agencies you’d expect to see if perhaps someone were trying to smuggle a bio-engineered, weaponized and highly virulent strain of virus; perhaps a coronavirus, to Wuhan, China. That the timeline has been revised backwards to encompass this arrest date is concerning and perhaps telling.
In summary, the veneer level work here overlaying the body of work in the catalog of articles I’ve already written, assembles to suggest a converging timeline relevant to our hypothesis. We now have evidence that Harvard affiliated spies were working to export “vials of biological research” to Wuhan, China whereby those efforts preceded the first known documented case in Wuhan, as first reported; and encompassed or included within it, the first report as given in the revised timeline of 17 Nov 19.
There is no evidence in my possession to link this in ways beyond what I’ve demonstrated here. I do find it highly peculiar that QAnon would post this very press release on 07 Feb 20 in #3842 and that it ties directly to Wuhan, China; and for obvious reasons.
No matter, the continued examination of Harvard, China, Wuhan and “biological research” smuggling is a worthy one given the current state of affairs.
Beyond that, WAKE-UP AMERICA! COVID-19 is functioning like a new 9/11 to usher-in the ‘new normal.’
Requisite disclaimer – this is now the 15th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.
There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.
At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)