18 Mar 20 (TWELFTH article in a series)
Listen very carefully to the words Dr. Deborah Birx is using; the path forward that she is laying; the future intentions that she is expressing, and as you do so, filter them through a lens reflective of how the events of 9/11 ushered-in the last ‘new normal.’ The evidence outlined in this SERIES of articles, which started as a basic inquiry to learn more about the backstory behind the effective treatment using Remesdivir in Washington State, has given reason to legitimately consider whether or not we are once again being herded and culled into the next phase, which equates to the latest version of the ‘new normal’ and courtesy of COVID-19. I for one just can’t move off of this notion (more accurately described as an ominous, instinctive feeling) because of the parallels this global event has to the former one and the abundance of evidence pointing in that direction.
With that said, my work in this series is most certainly slanted and by that, I mean that I’m hunting for evidence to support an hypothesis. That’s important to note because it renders different content since the research is filtered on the front end. Here’s the most relevant analog for the notion that if you look for something specific, rather than just looking in general, you are more likely to find it: Did you know that coronavirus strains exist commonly and naturally and represent 7-15% of viruses in tests for acute respiratory diseases? Yeah, it’s ALWAYS been there – right next to the flu and with relative exponentially less severe outcomes – but no one was herded into a position to feel compelled to look for it or care about it until COVID-19 unfolded with an aura of orchestration. THIS article courtesy of Martin Armstrong contains detailed relevant information in the form of a worthy 10-minute video (source for the percentages above.)
I’ll open with this – currently, I find myself as jaded and distrusting as I’ve ever been and with cause. THIS opinion piece from the other day essentially demonstrates how my shit can filled, overflowed and put me in this place. I say that mainly for this reason – I currently trust one person within the federal apparatus (and no one in my state) – Donald J. Trump. That’s where my line is right now. That’s important to concede because it influences my opinions.
So then, who is the lady standing in front of President Trump, addressing the nation like a slick seasoned veteran of the podium and doing so in the capacity of White House coronavirus response coordinator? I want to know more about this lady but first, let’s outline what she told us the other day. For that exercise, I’m relying on THIS White House press release to source the extracts quoted below, although it’s represented in near complete form.
Remarks by President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Members of the Coronavirus Task Force in Press Briefing
Issued on: March 17, 2020
EXTRACTED DIRECT QUOTES FROM DR. DEBORAH BIRX:
*(EDITORIAL COMMENTARY EMBEDDED INTO EXTRACTS)
Great. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. So I think what you’ve been hearing from us is to find solutions that are high quality and sustainable based on the frontline workers and governors’ requests. And I — those come in on the governors call. We’ve been immediately responsive to those. And that’s the level of red tape and bureaucracy that we have removed. (THESE ‘HIGH QUALITY’ AND ‘SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS’ WILL BE THE REVISED, NEW OR EXISTING EFFECTIVE COGS IN A NEW PROCESS SHE DESCRIBES BELOW.)
I think that point about sustainability and quality is very important. Because, as the President says, we’re creating a roadmap for a different level of functionality for future pandemics. Our flu-pandemic preparedness plan was a plan. Now we’re seeing where we have to revise, where we have to create new avenues of research, new avenues of work to really ensure that the need of the American people can be reached. (THIS ‘ROADMAP’ IS THE AFOREMENTIONED PROCESS [OR PLAN.] TAKE CAREFUL NOTE OF THE WORD CHOICE HERE – ‘DIFFERENT LEVEL OF FUNCTIONALITY’ – FILTER THAT THROUGH THE LENS OF WHAT IS CURRENTLY ONGOING AND THE RESTRICTIONS IN PLACE. TAKE EVEN MORE CAREFUL NOTE OF ‘FUTURE PANDEMICS,’ AS IT STRIKES AS FOREBODING. IS THIS A CONCESSION ON THEIR PART THAT THEY’VE NOT OF THE CAPACITY TO PREVENT THEM, OR IS IT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PRETEXT OR IS IT BOTH?)
We were adamant about having a high-quality test based on our commercial vendors. (OF COURSE, NO GLOBALIST CRISIS EXCLUDES A DIRECT CORPORATE INTERFACE. AS MENTIONED IN EARLIER ARTICLES, THIS GLOBAL PANDEMIC IS THE PERFECT COVER FOR MYRIAD NEFARIOUS INTENTIONS; INCLUDING SERVING AS A CONDUIT FOR CORRUPTION AND THE THEFT OF OBSCENE SUMS OF MONEY THAT IS NOW ON THE MOVE.)
We are asking every single American, no matter what your generation, from Z and up to X, and millennials in between, to really ensure that you’re following these guidelines. We hear every night of people who are not in work, moving that time into bars and other areas of large gatherings. (VIEW THIS THROUGH THE LENS OF INCREMENTALISM. THINK OF HOW EVERYTHING IS ALWAYS IMPLEMENTED INCREMENTALLY. IN THIS CASE, PRECAUTIONS CAN QUICKLY MOVE FROM ‘ASKING’ TO COMPELLING. THE ENCROACHMENT ON RIGHTS IS ALWAYS A SLOWER ONE THAT OCCURS ONE STEP AT A TIME, OR INCREMENTALLY, WHICH IS WHY IT’S OFTEN CALLED AN ‘EROSION’ OF RIGHTS.)
If we continue with that process, we will fail in containing this virus. So every single generation has a role to play. We’re asking our older generation to stay in their homes. And we’re asking the younger generations to support them in social contacting through videos and other Skype-type functions, or just the simple telephone. (IN THIS CONTEXT, ‘IF WE FAIL’ IS RELATIVE TO THE PREVIOUS QUOTE AND IS A DIRECT TRANSFER OF THE ONUS OF RESPONSIBILITY FROM THEM TO US. THIS IS PRETEXT. SHE IS SAYING THAT THEY HAVE ASSERTED THEMSELVES AS THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY IN THIS MATTER AND TO THE EXTENT THEY CAN LEGITIMATELY SUSPEND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THIS CAUSE, BUT IF THE OUTBREAK IS NOT CONTAINED AND PRESUMABLY DRACONIAN MEASURES MUST BE TAKEN, IT WILL BE OUR FAULT; THAT WE WILL GET WHAT WE DESERVE. MOREOVER, THEY HAVE ‘ASKED’ SENIORS TO REMAIN IN THEIR HOMES TO AVOID EXPOSURE AND CONTACT WITH OTHERS, WHICH GAINS FURTHER MEANING BELOW; BEYOND BEING AN INCREMENTAL STEP AS DESCRIBED. IMPORTANTLY, SHE DID NOT ASK THE YOUNGER GENERATION TO DO THE SAME.)
We’re asking the younger generations to stop going out in public places — to bars and restaurants — and spreading asymptomatic virus onto counter tops and knobs and grocery stores and grocery carts. (RELATIVE TO MY COMMENTS ABOVE, NOTE HOW YOUNG PEOPLE WERE NOT TOLD TO STAY HOME, RATHER THEY WERE TOLD NOT TO GO OUT. WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? WHERE ELSE ARE THEY GOING TO BE IF SCHOOLS ARE CLOSED, WORK IS SHUTTERED AND THEY’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO GO ANYWHERE? AGAIN, IT’S AN INCREMENTAL STEP. REFERENCING THE PREVIOUS QUOTE, YOU’LL ALSO NOTICE THAT ON TOP OF NOT BEING ABLE TO GO OUT ERGO BEING RELEGATED TO BEING AT HOME, YOUNG PEOPLE ARE BEING ‘ASKED’ TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH THE OLDER GENERATION. HOW IS THIS NOT THE BEGINNING OF DEMOGRAPHIC DIVISION AND SEQUESTRATION?)
I heard an innovation last night and this morning again on the news. I really want to applaud the private sector who are now creating senior-only shopping times. I think that’s extraordinary. I think that shows what America brings. And I think other countries will learn from us about how to really protect seniors in this type of way. (THE SAME DOCTOR WHO IS TELLING SENIORS TO STAY HOME AND YOUNGER GENERATIONS TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH THEM AND PRESUMABLY DUE TO THEIR RISK FACTORS AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INFECTION IS NOW INVITING THOSE SENIORS OUT INTO PUBLIC AND INTO THE SAME PLACES SHARED WITH NON-SENIORS WHEREBY THEY CAN COALESCE, ASSOCIATE, CO-MINGLE AND THEREFORE COMPROMISE THE VERY BASIS OF THE RATIONALE FOR KEEPING THEM HOME. AND THIS IS A GOOD IDEA TO HELP CONTROL A HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS PANDEMIC VIRUS AND TO PREVENT ITS SPREAD? THIS DOESN’T COMPORT WITH BASIC PRAGMATISM, LOGIC OR EPIDEMIOLOGY.)
I’m hoping that carries through to next year when we have our flu epidemic, where we can really have a very different profile of the amount of mortality that we have during flu that we never talk about. Anywhere from 15,000 to 45,000 individuals are lost every year. If we learn how to do this well, and sustain some of those core changes, we can change the way respiratory viruses — not only for this, but the future — affect Americans. (THAT OUGHT TO GET YOUR ATTENTION SO LONG AS YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE JUST SAID AND HOW SHE JUST SAID IT. I’LL PICK THAT UP IMMEDIATELY BELOW.)DR. DEBORAH BIRX – WHITE HOUSE CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE COORDINATOR
Do you see it? Do you see the duplicity of what just occurred. She spent the entire front end of her speech setting it all up and carefully so. This was a prudently formulated and delivered statement from Dr. Birx and there are definitely constructive aspects to it.
Here’s precisely what Dr. Birx did and it’s emblematic of how these duplicitous people function. It’s all predicated on the notion of a mortality rate:hysteria ratio, which will cause a fulcrum shift described further down.
As of this article, the CDC/SOURCE has the total number of deaths in the US at 97. So, with 97 deaths on the books you can’t buy toilet paper, go to school, go to work, watch sporting events, leave your home or visit your grandparents. Examine the level of hysteria relative to the number of deaths – all of that stuff:97.
Dr. Birx is rationalizing and justifying these types of draconian measures based on the threat it poses to the American people, which is definitively represented by 97 deaths and counting. For a reference point on when and why to be concerned about something, whether it total 97 or something else, there are 101 US auto fatalities daily and no one is saying a peep about that. That’s over 700 people a week. In fact, more people will die today in a car wreck than have died in US in the history of COVID-19 and no one is parking their cars for good or even bringing attention to it. If the MSM were reporting on it, they would be talking about catastrophic numbers from this week that will have seen nearly another 1,000 dead Americans (compared to 97 total.) You get my point.
Dr. Birx is cementing the draconian measures as rooted in the threat to Americans as represented by a total of 97 deaths. That’s important to understand because it represents how the fulcrum will be shifted. The other relevant piece of information she provided was the accurately noted death rate for the flu at 14,000-15,000.
Understand this – you can’t convince Americans to align with such unreasonable and draconian measures and guidelines for the freaking flu – most regular, ordinary Americans would tell you to go pound sand and then kick you in the ass on your way out. That dog won’t hunt.
What you can do, though, is convince them to align with; or better yet you can herd them into that position with fear and panic as delivered by an hyperbolic MSM and the federal apparatus; and do so by using an evil, scary sounding virus that has always been around and kills exponentially fewer (97 total:15,000 annually) people than the flu. Then, once they’re all herded up and quaking in fear, you proclaim the grand success of your omnipotent and authoritative response to the pandemic virus; which is an otherwise mild version of the flu. That’s how you set the hook before you move the fulcrum. The ignorant will buy-in and shift their positions moving forward.
From there, you repackage the draconian measures and give it a name perhaps akin to something palatable like ‘common sense gun laws’ or ‘The Patriot Act.’ When the flu then comes rolling around as it always does and as Dr. Birx was sure to mention (again, think about the establishment of pretext here), she or authorities can refer back to those 15,000 American lives that will be lost if we don’t take measures similar to those for the global pandemic of COVID-19. It’s a play to once again tug on heartstrings of Americans and compel folks to think with their hearts in lieu of their minds. American love to virtue signal with orders like this. They’ll fall in line and comply when ordinarily, they’d tell you go to hell – it’s just the flu. Heck, you know they’ll queue-up on social media to virtue signal how compliant they are. That’s why social media exists – it’s a control mechanism.
That is precisely how the fulcrum is shifted and a ‘new normal’ is ushered-in.
Now that we know what Dr. Birx is telling us, let’s outline exactly whom Dr. Birx is as she occupies position of semi-global leadership whereby she was thrust into the capacity of White House coronavirus response coordinator:
- To set the tone, Oprah Winfrey took time to cover her in a flattering tone: SOURCE
- She has ‘legendary’ status in the MSM for her significant anti-viral and HIV work; as well as previous epidemic response experience: SOURCE
- She has a history of wide recognition from many: SOURCE
- She is actively recruiting a properly indoctrinated and much less discerning ‘millennial’ generation into her fold: SOURCE
- “She is somebody that knows how to manage the whole of the U.S. government to move it toward a particular goal. If the White House lets her do that, it could be exactly the kind of coordination that has been lacking up to this point,” said Matthew Kavanaugh, who directs Georgetown’s Global Health Policy and Governance Initiative and knows Birx from his years working on global HIV policy.” – Here she’s being propped-up by ‘global health,’ organization which is the context chosen by the Globalists and most certainly an area of Globalist interest and influence: SOURCE
- She has prior entanglements back to Bill Gates and funding. “To take on this population in force, a trio of funders in 2014 launched a program called DREAMS, or Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe women. The $280 million initiative is funded by PEPFAR, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Nike Foundation.” SOURCE SOURCE
- She ticks-off a multitude of criteria for a typical DSSG/MIC human asset: “Prior to the CDC, Ambassador Birx, a proud Army veteran, having risen to the rank of Colonel in the US Army, served at the Department of Defense as Director of the U.S. Military HIV Research Program at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. In that role, she led development of the Thai vaccine trial which became the first clinical HIV/AIDS research study to show the potential that a vaccine could protect against HIV. She also served as an Assistant Chief of the Hospital Immunology Service at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.” SOURCE SOURCE
- SHE IS AN OBAMA APPOINTEE HELD OVER FROM THAT GLOBALIST ADMINISTRATION TO THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, MEANING THAT IT IS REASONABLE TO BELIEVE THAT OBAMA HAS THE CAPACITY TO POSSIBLY INFLUENCE OR SHAPE THE PRESIDENT’S RESPONSE BY MEANS OF HER PREXISTING ENTANGLEMENTS WITH BOTH OBAMA AND GATES/WHO. SOURCE SOURCE. SOURCE SOURCE
In summary, we can examine this….
We have an Obama appointee with established ties to Bill Gates, who happens to control and fund the W.H.O, which happens to have been thrust into position as the leading authority of a global pandemic with a questionable genesis, whereby it was placed into position in a compulsory transition meeting that required President Trump to attend and which included an identical pandemic scenario and was coupled with an unneeded new law as decreed in an executive order by then President Obama. Hmmm.
Is it possible that the Globalists, with Obama running point, were able to insert a false flag viral pandemic construct into the President’s transition meeting circa 13 Jan 17 and then leverage it to actually usurp the President’s authority over the response to it? Look at the direction the COVID-19 response has taken; and FOR 97 DEATHS. And look at how they are projecting it for the future (flu) – 15,000 deaths. And look at how 9/11 ushered-in the last ‘new normal.’ And then ask yourself if that’s where we are now – on the door step of the next ‘new normal.’
Before you answer that last question, answer this one. What primary circumstance does the 9/11 false flag construct have in common with the possible covid-19 false flag construct such that it actually facilitates such pervasive, invasive and unconstitutional encroachment on individual rights to occur?
Answer: They both occurred under the watch of a Republican president. It’s the only way to herd the right – their guy has to be in place.
Oh, and one more thing. Remember that on the same day the viral pandemic scenario was presented to the incoming Trump administration by the outgoing Obama administration on 13 Jan 17, the Russia/Flynn revelations were made public and he was in the room and a part of that meeting (TIMING! That’s no coincidence rather it’s intentional distraction and disruption.)
Now, again, do you think that a ‘global viral pandemic’ construct with a total of 97 deaths stateside might be the vehicle needed to usher in the ‘new normal?’
I think it could be.
CATALOG of all articles in this series.
*Edited from its original form to include the remarks about the timing of the Flynn/Russia revelations.