WHAT DOES ‘ONE OF TWENTY TWO’ MEAN? – Discerning Q#346 as re-posted today

Today, Q reposted drop #436 from 22 Dec 17, which is provided in full below. To begin, notice how the drop opens with, “ONE OF TWENTY TWO:.” Using basic rules of grammar, we can infer that the colon (:) following “TWO” tells us that everything following it is categorized under the notion of “twenty two.” Ergo, we’re looking for “one” of “twenty two” and those are fairly specific numbers to locate within the context of it all. Some basic research returned interesting findings.

In retrospect and examining those findings, Q’s introduction now has new meaning and relevance through a particular lens: the political corruption emanating out of Ukraine and the apparent construct that has the Bidens, Pelosis and likely a whole host of others personally benefiting from having rigged the natural gas sector (and likely others) of the global energy sector (and likely others.) For the moment, the evidence appears to be restricted to the natural gas sector.

So, what allows us to draw the aforementioned conclusion? This does. Looking through the lens of US politicians having rigged the global energy sector to defraud others to the tune of billions and perhaps trillions, we should examine the President’s meeting and remarks that occurred eight days prior to the original Q drop. From that timeline alone we gain some context.

On December 14, 2017, the President gathered in the Roosevelt Room to slash regulations. This was an important press release being so early in Mr. Trump’s first term. Okay then, so how does slashing regulations fit into an impeachment scheme and a Q drop? Well, consider this portion of his opening remarks via the press release linked below (EMPHASIS MINE),

“We’re here today for one single reason: to cut the red tape of regulation. For many decades, an ever-growing maze of regulations, rules, restrictions has COST OUR COUNTRY TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of dollars, millions of jobs, countless American factories, and devastated many industries. But all that has changed the day I took the oath of office, and it’s changed rapidly.”

– President Donald J. Trump

Why is that relevant? To rig an entire sector of the global energy market for personal profit, the MOST INTELLIGENT AVENUE TO DO IT would be to ascend to a position of authority over the regulatory process so that desired changes can be made to legally or illegally achieve the objective. Therefore, if one wants to establish such a position, one’s options are basically limited to working for that industry, working in that industry or working in a body that functions to REGULATE that industry. The latter is precisely what the Bidens and the Pelosis (and likely others) did. They ascended to some of the highest-level bureaucratic positions in the US with regulatory authority in those sectors so as to personally profit by corrupt and illegal means.

So then, just how did the US lose “trillions and trillions” in legitimately regulated industries? It didn’t. More likely, once the President entered office and tasked his administration with overhauling a failed economy, they appropriately pursued the regulatory angle. That’s elementary. The work therein likely uncovered all of the corruption that is now making its way into the public’s eyes as I type.

Recall, the President recently reminded us all of this development on 08 Nov 19 as he departed on Marine One. At that time, he said, “I caught the swamp. I caught them all. Let’s see what happens. Nobody else could have done that but me. I caught all of this corruption that was going on, and nobody else could have done it.” The President told us in November how he caught them. Now that we know what to look for, we realize that he actually told us about two years earlier on 14 Dec 17. Did we have more than we knew? Sure looks like it.

So, what was The President talking about back on 14 Dec 17? Well, reasonably it looks a lot like what we’re seeing coming out of Ukraine right now. Perhaps there was work around ONE of the TWENTY TWO regulations that once uncovered, provided a crystal clear picture of corruption and criminality.

We can now see how this 14 Dec 17 Roosevelt Room meeting had ‘RAMIFications’ beyond what the President alluded to in his original comments. The President was drawing our attention to all of the regulations that were cut – all 22. Q, on the other hand, was drawing our attention to one of them. It’s the one that apparently ties back to Ukraine, implicates a whole host of unsavory and corrupt politicians and ultimately would create a very real need for those seeking self-preservation to remove this president from office.

Is this not another example of future proves past? At the time this drop was originally made – 14 Dec 17 – Ukraine was not even on the radar screen as the world was preoccupied with Russia, Russia, Russia! Given what we now understand about the depth and breadth of the Ukrainian corruption in light of the newly understood significance of the President’s “one of twenty two” claims, we now have a plausible angle. Namely, the Deep State was hellbent intent on executing whatever plans were necessary to protect the Ukrainian corruption from ever seeing sunlight.

Here’s the rub and perhaps the entire reason we’re seeing impeachment in lieu of some other strategy to redress President Trump and his intentions. In short and regardless of Mr. Trump or the nature of him as a leader, person, president or otherwise, the crime and corruption is so broad, deep and entangling that it could NEVER see the inside of a courtroom. The corruption is just too expansive. That only leaves a few options for these power brokers: leverage the president with compromising intelligence, remove him with the 25th Amendment, remove him with impeachment or remove him via assassination. Now you know why were sitting at impeachment with the 25th waiting in the wings.

Here’s the larger implication that’s more difficult to wrap ones head around and yet it supports precisely what I’ve long contended – this entire anti-Trump effort is actually a much longer endeavor of corruption and crime that likely dates back to the early years of Obama’s first term and well before Trump’s arrival on the scene. This means that all of Q’s cryptic communication in this particular drop, which I did not expand on in this article, pertains to corruption and crime predating Trump’s arrival.

Therefore, in the spirit of self-preservation, all of the actions and events therein were RESPONSIVE and intended to prevent sunlight from reaching those particular and preexisting events. That means we are all amidst the throes of a tug-of-war between self-preservation for some and institutional preservation for others. With those being mutually exclusive and mutually destructive to one another, the likely eventual outcome will be somewhere in the middle; leaving more questions than answers. As I wrote earlier today, see JFK, see Oklahoma City, see 9/11, see US history. 

Here’s what I mean by the mutually exclusive/destructive statement. To preserve the institutions, individuals must face exposure to legal jeopardy. To expose individuals to legal jeopardy, you jeopardize the institutions. They are mutually exclusive. They are mutually destructive. Why? Because the people facing exposure to legal jeopardy and who seek self-preservation also work for those same institutions. Welcome to the swamp. Welcome to reality.

Q told us to “follow the guide.” The guide is telling us WHY we are amidst an effort to remove a duly elected president. That particular WHY sure looks like the global corruption emanating from Ukraine. Nonetheless, it sure is peculiar how all of this keeps leading back to Ukraine, which is also known as ‘The Keystone in the Arch.’

Q#346:
ONE OF TWENTY TWO:
[DNC BREACH / DOSSIER]
[DNC]
[SR]>
[WL]>
HUSSEIN>
DNI DIR>
CLOWN DIR>
CLAS: 1-12>
GOOG>
CROWDSTRIKE>
DNC>
(SR187)(MS13 (2) 187)>
DWS_DIR>
F-I/D-J ASSIST>
“INSURANCE”
/_\ >
HUSSEIN>
HRC>
LL>
JC>
AM>
PS>
(SUPPORT: CS, NP, AS, CLAS-1, CLAS-2, CLAS-3, CLAS-4, CLAS-5, CLAS-6)>
BRIT INTEL>
HRC CAMP PAY>
DNC PAY>
CLAS: 1-4 PAY>
STEELE>
PODESTA>
HOLDER RELAY SPEC RUSSIA>
CLAS: 1-9>
US SEN NO NAME>
US SEN CLAS-1>
US SEN CLAS-2>
JC>
LL>
HUSSEIN>
[FISA 2]
PRES DAILY B>
US SEN NO NAME>
NEWS SHOP>
BUZZF>
PUBLIC/NARRATIVE.
STAGE SET FUTURE PREVENT/REMOVAL OP.
RAMIF: US INTEL LEGAL SPY ON PRES CANDIDATE / PRES ELECT / R CONGRESS / R SEN / NEWS FRIENDLY / ETC>
Q

– QAnon

Sources:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-deregulation/
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/12/15/document-deregulation-bolsters-national-security-n2423247
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2017/12/14/white-house-to-make-major-deregulation-push-n2422539
https://carnegieendowment.org/1997/03/01/keystone-in-arch-ukraine-in-emerging-security-environment-of-central-and-eastern-europe-pub-195

One thought on “WHAT DOES ‘ONE OF TWENTY TWO’ MEAN? – Discerning Q#346 as re-posted today

Add yours

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

A WordPress.com Website.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: