December 4, 2023
We are here and it is now. Further than that, all human knowledge is moonshine. - HL Mencken
A follow-up article to the 08 Nov 21 John Durham/Special Counsel article that advises folks to temper their expectations for Durham as thoroughly evidenced by deep and wide fact set.
The 4th article in a recent series on the Durham clean-up/cover-up operation [Sussmann trial] that stacks-up further evidence of the analysis for the carve-out being made for FBI General Counsel James Baker and revisits previous warnings about Durham drawing back as far as 01 Jan 20. Further evidence is presented from The Federalist indicating efforts to protect the FBI/DOJ.
The seventh article in a series: Michael Sussmann was acquitted today. That said, this is not the time nor is it the place to engage in "I told you so." It's also not the intent of this article. Rather the intent is to get people to wake-up to misinformation, disinformation and malinformation that detracts from the most important two things: truth and mission.
In short and whereas the public may believe that Jack Smith might have erred by casting his jurisdiction over the stolen 2020 election by indicting Trump with charges enveloping it; and whereby discovery permits Trump to finally and publicly present that evidence, the DOJ has its Obama-appointed evidentiary gatekeeper in Judge Tanya Chutkan keenly positioned as a guardrail against that. By all indications, the analysis evidences how Trump’s indictment serves as a mechanism to 1-conceal and cover-up the theft of the 2020 election while 2-simultaneously removing him as a candidate for 2024.
The third article in a series covering the Durham Special Counsel that evidences further cogent and pragmatic advice to temper expectations about the Durham outcome. The cover-up angle of "Clinton duped 'em all!" is discussed.
Can't find what you're looking for? Try refining your search:
