The third article in a series covering the Durham Special Counsel that evidences further cogent and pragmatic advice to temper expectations about the Durham outcome. The cover-up angle of "Clinton duped 'em all!" is discussed.
93 search results for “Durham”
The seventh article in a series: Michael Sussmann was acquitted today. That said, this is not the time nor is it the place to engage in "I told you so." It's also not the intent of this article. Rather the intent is to get people to wake-up to misinformation, disinformation and malinformation that detracts from the most important two things: truth and mission.
The most important aspects of the Durham Special Counsel investigation that few seem willing to discuss beyond the toothless process crimes charges for ancillary weasels who matter not are the timing and the funding of Durham. Is anyone asking why it is that Durham, who is in receipt of a tranche of declassified and other documents from former ODNI John Ratcliffe that delineate and evidence the crimes writ large identified as “Obamagate,” is only now seeming to gain traction? At a time five years down the road as the crow flies and with President Trump on the outside looking in, Proxy Joe Biden on the inside and incapable of seeing at all and Australia bearing as the litmus test for the new America that has its illegitimate and installed ruler driving mandatory experimental mRNA pseudo-vaccines for all? All of this despite the now clearly established and actual science evidencing their deliberately under-reported and globally widespread detrimental and deadly side effects; not to mention that the vaccinated are driving viral transmission and cases?
The fractured leadership is real and so will be the ripple effect across the cause. Let's hope it sends a ripple through the fabric of America that causes her people to unify and rise-up in the face of evil because it's now our most viable option; if not our only one. And it's been that way since the beginning no matter whether The People realized it. The only question remaining is will they realize it in time and if so, do they have the gumption to assume personal risk and do something about it?
The 73rd article in a series on war, famine and disease.: "There's a bit of evil genius to the approach and the direct evidence is right in front of us. The genius goes well beyond the likely child/infant deflection component. It's characterized by what the media sees in its reporting v. what it doesn't. What it sees: the inherent contradiction in the statement that it's not a sexually transmitted disease and the ensuing and distracting argument and debate over it. It serves as a deflection from what is most important and which they do not see. What it does NOT see: a lapdog media outlet providing a necessary and planned narrative change to accommodate and achieve political objectives for the 2022 midterms. The projected narrative change was the jump from a minority population to the general public but most importantly, the only thing required for the outbreak to make the jump was the change in the narrative."
Can't find what you're looking for? Try refining your search:
