The Still – Vol. 7, 22 Mar 21



The Still – Vol. 6, 20 Mar 21

The Still, Vol. 6, 20 Mar 21: 1) presidential numbers, 3 presidents & the 25th Amendment, 2) kabuki theater: U.S. & China in Alaska, 3) Biden’s military, 4) military undermining of Trump’s Afghanistan withdrawal, 5) Putin & Biden duke it out, 6) COVID-19/CDC update 7) illegal immigration & press access, 8) liberal insanity (shootings, riots & de-funding the police, 9) worthy odds & ends (Soros, U.S. socialism, Bush, political prosecutions & Maxwell


The Still – Vol. 5, 18 Mar 21

The Still, Vol. 5, 18 Mar 21: 1) “Stuck In The Middle With You”, 2) Q: DRAIN THE SWAMP, 3) insurrection at the Capitol, 4) 2 recent shooting/gun incidents/false flags?, 5) CGI fail/Biden video, 6) Cuomo/other governors/nursing home investigations, 7) McConnell/filibuster/reconciliation, 8) genesis of COVID-19 (update), 9) road to war/back to Russia, China, Taiwan, North Korea, 10) illegal immigration, 11) Durham


The Still – Vol. 4, 16 Mar 21

The Still, Vol. 4, 16 Mar 21: 1) Obama’s purge of military leaders relative to today and any hopes of a post-election Trump plan leveraging the military, 2) Biden’s military, 3) COVID-19 update, 4) election fraud update, 5) illegal immigration update, 6) insane left (Wheeler & Newsom), 7) John Durham (wild!)


The Still – Vol. 2, 12 Mar 21

Vol. 2 of The Still: 1) comparing contemporary America to WWII era Nazi Germany, 2) social media update (Gab), 3) Cuomo deflection, 4) COVID-19 development/s, 5) Merrick Garland confirmation, 6) FISAgate/Rosenstein, 7) 25th Amendment/Biden, 8) Biden’s military, 9) election fraud, 10) Blunt perp walk?, 11) a door open for hope


CRITICAL: The Pending Pivot Back to Russia

There is an ongoing pivot back to Russia and it’s pending on the finality of the Biden steal. As 80 million Americans find themselves imprisoned by draconian measures delivered by the CCP’s weaponized pandemic, they are also trying to sort-out the granular aspects of a patently stolen election. Meanwhile, there is a fundamental shift that is occurring and is likely going unnoticed. The implications of it all are profound.

The backdrop to this is the reported hacking of the Department of Energy (and others) relative to SolarWinds, which is deeply enmeshed in the 2020 election vis-a-vis Dominion/Smartmatic. Astonishingly, the hack has left significant components to the entire federal digital system completely vulnerable, unmitigated, not redressed and at the control of hostile foreign powers. You’ll hear those details in the interview linked below.

You can go deeper with that article but the main premise will suffice moving forward.

As we get into all of this, recall the evidence that Eric Snowden presented whereby the intelligence community has the ability to hack into a system, extract the targeted data and then intentionally leave behind evidence of “Russian hacking tools.” As you move through this article, continue to ask yourself this basic question. Who more likely executed this hack, Russia or the intelligence community that is on the cusp of being disemboweled in the full public spectrum and which has the capability to leave behind a Russian marker to pin it elsewhere?

That’s a rhetorical question but keep asking it nonetheless.

All of this draws back to the initial vectoring in on the Trump administration as authorized by Hillary Clinton and initiated by Obama’s federal apparatus (intelligence community, CIA, DOJ, FBI, Congress, etc.)

It’s as simple as this and it’s really old hat. Russia is the current boggeyman du jour for the Deep State. When I was a kid, it was the USSR (and not forgetting the Iran hostage affair during the Carter administration.) When I was in college the second time (late 90s) it became radical Islamic terrorism. Get the picture? The boogeyman is as fluid as a viral pandemic construct. It can be whatever, whenever and why-ever as desired.

It’s pure evil. It’s also a war for the mind and many Americans have been programmed to be feeble-minded. It’s cyclical and unbreakable for many.

The spine of the overarching and ongoing multinational overthrow effort is China and the CCP, which is why Russia is the our boogeyman du jour. It’s an easy sell as big, scary and mean and the narrative is already deeply sown; ad nauseam.

Clinton maintained an illegal and unsecured server to deliver China anything and everything sacred (that’s a mere drop in Clinton’s ocean); China designed and developed the COVID-19 strain with our direct assistance, money and proprietary knowledge; China unleashed that bio-WMD against us; and to facilitate it all, China deeply infiltrated the fabric of the nation and its institutions on its way to compromising untold numbers of US leaders, politicians, citizens and more. To that, add one stolen election and the installation of their purchased puppet, Joe Biden.

But look over here, y’all… it’s muh Russia. Feeble-minded Americans actually believe this tripe. War for the mind.

The first whiff for me came in this Lou Dobbs interview and we’ll begin there.

Instantly, the red flags show. This is the same distrusted Fox News Network that stabbed 74 million Americans in the back on election night that is rolling out a Deep State shill to sow the Russia narrative even deeper. It’s complete and utter garbage in terms of the Russian attribution of an actual hack.

Again, who more likely executed this hack, Russia or the intelligence community that is on the cusp of being disemboweled in the full public spectrum and which has the capability to leave behind a Russian marker to pin it elsewhere?

This morning, we all awoke to this item from The Hill.

Again, who more likely executed this hack, Russia or the intelligence community that is on the cusp of being disemboweled in the full public spectrum and which has the capability to leave behind a Russian marker to pin it elsewhere?

The Deep State leviathan sold us all out to China and the CCP for their partnership in assuming full and final control of this once proud constitutional republic. They drove that effort with a false Russia narrative devised to deflect everything away from China and it’s purchase of an illegitimately installed pupped in Joe Biden. Nancy Pelosi calibrated her irregular impeachment of President Trump to veil COVID-19 as it was ushered-in and saddled between Christmas and New Years. It then was leveraged to steal the election. We were placed on a war footing with China long ago and at the latest when they released a bio-WMD against this nation back in October.

Now, pending the finality of the Biden win, that war footing is being pivoted back to Russia and it sounds like Congress cares to leverage it further in suppressing the great awakening while further driving the great reset. The pivot back to Russia is here and it’s not going anywhere.

It’s all on the line America. Time to stand-up and fight like Americans.



We’ve recently released two new videos:

The Only Bridge Between Reality and Hope: The US Military

This is not the time nor place to recapitulate the Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment, COVID-19, riots/domestic terrorism, engineered race war and stolen election construct – because that’s precisely what it is – and I refer you to the homepage where all of that information is archived. Rather, this is an endeavor to comprehend why the US military has been and remains the only bridge between reality and hope; reality being defined as the end of this constitutional republic as the nation slips into CCP branded totalitarian, Marxist communism forever.

To properly frame it, consider this from a previous article entitled THE PLAN: Institutions, a Stolen Election and a War Footing With China. The position rests with circumventing the institutions altogether and for their inherent and undeterred corruption and criminality.

The lion’s share of our comprehensive list of assertions is too great to present here. Understand, though, that they draw back on George H.W. Bush, his entry into and ascendance through the federal government and into the Oval Office, and relative to Attorney General William Barr, who was first appointed by him and whereby Barr is centered squarely in the middle of China’s acquisition of Dominion/Smartmatic; including Chinese ownership of proprietary information equating to the patents representing the keys to the castle in terms of stealing an election remotely.

Did President Trump actually believe that he was going to receive fidelity from just about anyone within the institutions? Congress, SCOTUS, the intelligence community, the Judiciary or the broader leviathan federal apparatus? That’s a jagged and bitter pill to swallow, is it not?

Would he get that fidelity from a twice-appointed Barr in his directorship of the DOJ? The scoreboard read 0-22 last time I posted on it. Not sure what it is now, but you get the point.

The institutions – all of them – had to be circumvented. What does that leave?

The President knew that at a minimum, he could not depend on the FBI, CIA or DOJ and now, on the heels of its dismissal of the Texas suit, the Supreme Court of the United States. Understand, though, FISA authority and oversight rests under the jurisdiction of SCOTUS and that was the primary mechanism leveraged to initiate angling-in on President Trump. Think he didn’t know that? Why did Admiral Rogers make that shocking impromptu trip to see the Mr. Trump?

Digressing, I stated in the last article that SCOTUS would not take a determining role in deciding the election result and that’s exactly what they did. The surprising aspect was that Trump’s newly appointed justices stood-down in the denial. That was unanticipated but perhaps not in retrospect and perhaps for reasons unknown (see the thread from @John in the bonus items below.) I don’t know and I’m reminding you that my background is as an investigator conducting intensive investigations for law firms and insurance companies; not as a constitutional scholar (although we all enjoy armchair quarterbacking from time, to time and if for no other reason than to stay sharp.) Ergo, I prefer to defer to experts in their fields.

No matter, SCOTUS has been corrupt for a long time; just like the rest of the institutions – all of them.

Which John Roberts is it that appears on the Jeffrey Epstein flight logs? Is it the John Roberts from the now-dead Fox News Network that stabbed 74 million Americans in the back on election night or is it the one who serves as Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court? And for the Roberts that actually matters, how and why did he get that black eye?

All of this and a bunch more has now reduced our landscape to pretty simple terms. I presented the following graphic once the planned riots broke out in May and after I predicted those riots by a rough three weeks. The “WE ARE HERE” is indicative of our progress at that time.

Common sense tells you where we are now.

How’s it looking?

I know – tense. Razor thin margins. No period of time in my lifetime has brought such dire circumstances and that half of America thinks it’s awesome has me and certainly much like you, at my wit’s end.

The graphic is an accurate representation of the current scenario given the bulk of cited and sourced work and evidence on our website. We’re on the precipice of a completed communist overthrow, plainly and simply. Now ask yourself if that dynamic moves down the law enforcement line or the military line. Again, “communist overthrow” – where is the jurisdiction inherent in that?

There’s a bonus item at the bottom of this article. I encourage you to watch the video because it was made in conjunction @EntheosShines and the attorney referenced therein. The genesis of the project all goes back to Entheos.

The video portrays an enigmatic man from Noxubee County, Mississippi named Ike Brown, who began registering voters when he was 17 thus setting the path for him to establish the foundation for the Democratic National Party Machine’s tactics and strategies that were overlaid nationally to expedite the voter fraud requisite for the theft of the 2020 election. What undid their efforts was the enormous and historically notable vote result earned by Mr. Trump, which was voluminous to the extent that it literally broke the algorithms employed to steal the election for Biden electronically and remotely; and on a parallel track with the boots-on-the-ground Brown tactics.

Bearing in mind the overthrow dynamic, the US military becomes our only remedy and evidence demonstrates this was determined years ago. It was placed into writing on 12 September 18. More on that momentarily because we’re getting into the nitty-gritt of it all. Granular.

To set the stage for the topic of undoing it all and whereby the US military enters as the only hope for an available path to do so, vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris must be understood from both a broader sense and from one that serves the objectives of the agenda and political construct targeting this President and this nation. There is a very important distinction that I’ll draw your attention to and Mr. Trump brought it to mine.

Our article entitled Kamala’s Kontroversy for Amerika is a deeper dig drawing back for a couple of years and to the extent that I found her eventual plans for the payment of slavery reparations to black Americans. It’s found inside of an unneeded and highly suspicious anti-lynching bill tied to the orchestrated Charlottesville incident. That’s but one example of what’s coming. The article is highly recommended and here’s an extract (introduction) from it that’s not short in its visceral tone.

More from the same.

So, that’s set’s the tone. Here’s the distinction that bears down and we’re all compelled to pause here to remember that President Trump has been and presumably continues to be suspect of former President Obama’s legitimate citizenship. Think about how that would serve foreign adversaries attempting to penetrate the highest office in the land.

A foreign adversary would have two primary vectors: 1) flip an actual American and insert him into the Oval Office or 2) develop and groom a foreign imposter to be inserted. Which one gives you greater overarching control and which one comes with higher degrees of inherent risk and unpredictability?

That’s an important distinction – risk assessment and risk exposure. The second option clearly worked because Obama served two terms. Point learned.

Now consider this from the article.

Here are the President’s own brief remarks on it.

What holds our attention in all of this is the granular bit about citizenship relative to foreign nations’ overthrow efforts relative to an established pattern of infiltration by means of insertion.

Let’s presume that Mr. Trump is accurate – that both Harris and Obama are not eligible to be president or vice president for failure to meet the citizenship threshold. Let’s presume that the foreign and questionable backdrops to each ones respective parents is accurate. When we do, it falls directly onto our established generational timeline helping to confirm another longstanding premise. It’s established in the Ike Brown video and this image is a screenshot.

What does that mean? Consider what I outlined already? Brown tactics were used to install Obama – the Smartmatic software ultimately ties back to 2000 and the Bush administration and they used it to steal Florida in 2012; and it’s not new. We haven’t had legitimate elections in over a decade.

In short here, the point is that they broke the ice installing Obama, they’re ousting the anomaly in Trump and they’re inserting Harris through that broken ice. They’re both chosen, developed, groomed and have similar foreign backgrounds.

Now we get to the crux of it all and it rests on yet another longstanding position in that Joe Biden is nothing more than a placeholder candidate (there has been no president-elect determined.) I contend that at a determined time, he’ll step aside for the true intended insertion.

The primary vector for the insertion was identified in July. It centers on delaying all important matters (another established premise – DELAY IS THE PLAY!) and most importantly, the election result, past inauguration day so as to permit the insertion of the House Speaker (#2 in the line of succession behind the VPOTUS, who would also be ushered-out) into the Oval Office by means of enforcing continuity of government protocols.

At this point, a new vector – perhaps a contingency plan or perhaps the original plan with Pelosi being the contingency – appears to have emerged.

As things continue to bottleneck toward a crescendo and a breaking point and as all of the President’s legal remedies are exhausted, the options for reversing the script become limited. It’s here that we defer to a constitutional attorney and using his graphics as re-posted by General Flynn. The four graphics are presented in full below.

I’m not summarizing this information to provide further meaning but rather drawing upon it to support our positions. That being said, I highly encourage you to consume independently, slowly and thoroughly for a picture of the path forward through the constitutional lens.

First we focus-in on the 12th Amendment and again, I’m sparing us a full layman’s translation, so let’s hone in on the angle that might permit for a backdoor insertion of Kamala Harris as president while galvanizing our position that Biden is merely a placeholder serving a purpose like a corrupt pack mule.

Harris’ insertion equates to the Deep State circumventing the will of the people with a failed presidential candidate and inserting her as vice president alongside a president they plan to remove after the election result is finally determined and the office is occupied.

The Biden laptop/hard drives are old news. Why is the MSM just now reporting on them? Ushering-out Joe?

Barr knew about Biden’s investigations for months and veiled them from everyone. Why? Keeping it hush-hush until it’s time to usher-out Joe?

Insertion complete. Overthrow complete. Understand?

Here is where I postulate that the 12th Amendment may set a path for this. Factoring in here are the electoral college and the States’ delegation of electors as well as the avenue for the House to determine the election result.

This from the 12th,

The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President…

Given the vote totals as they stand, that’s Harris.

Original intent behind the election of the president as seen through the electoral college is to focus on “the men” meaning the attributes and characteristics of the men themselves and save any political parties. They were not voting for a party ticket of POTUS/VPOTUS but for the two best men and whereby one had to be from outside of their own state. Ergo, the 12th originally designates that state electors cast two votes for two individuals, not one for POTUS and one for VPOTUS.

The 12th permits that if a clear winner can’t be determined, the House determines the vote. But what if the House isn’t capable of making that determination? According to the 12th,

[And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.–]

Is there a constitutional avenue to backdoor Kamala? Does it matter? Since the MSM and the DOJ have decided to align the release of the Biden laptop/hard drives story with the story of Bidens being under investigation by the DOJ, respectively, do they even need constitutional paths? Or can they simply push Biden out on the merits of his resume alone and that reflecting on him as being the worst and most corrupt and criminal candidate of all time? Or let his progressing senility drive the argument to remove him with the 25th? Or he feigns illness and resigns over a disagreement, like he recently promised. The plausible scenarios appear numerable.

Again, I’m asking questions and we’ll leave it for the constitutional scholars to back-fill the details but no matter, at any point they decide to “cancel” Joe, Kamala is positioned and ready just as designed.

We’re now full circle and here’s the justification for all of it. That being the justification to establish the US military as the only foreseeable remedy to the clear treason at hand.

Look back up at Raiklin’s first graphic and examine the line item for 18 Dec 20.

That is a very important date and you’ll notice that it ties to ODNI, or the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and that’s now John Ratcliffe and noting that Dan Coats’ prior removal is critical here; especially given that he’s an establishment asset. Ergo, we pin our hopes on Ratcliffe.

Examine what he is responsible for submitting on 18 Dec 20 (this extract as sourced below.)

Keep your eye on 18 Dec 20. Now, draw back on Raiklin’s last graphic above and specifically point 5 relative to the ODNI and you’ll note that it’s what I just outlined in the above extract.

Now ask yourself where the constitutional authority is derived for Ratcliffe’s report, which will be augmented by all of the election fraud evidence from Giuliani, Powell, Wood, the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion (The Kraken), et al?

Allow me to show you precisely where that is. It’s here. In this. This extract is from President Trump’s Executive Order as set forth on 12 September 2018.

To go deeper – much deeper – here is a two-part article analyzing the President’s Executive Order relative to the Flynn Case.

Marker Met – Flynn First! E.O. Has the Stage Set (Part I)
Marker Met – Flynn First! E.O. Has the Stage Set (Part II)

Did the President circumvent the institutions because he knew they were rotten to the core? Did he assume a lie in wait posture pending the completion of the construct – the certification of the 2020 election? Did a bio-WMD launched against the US to leverage the theft of the 2020 election so as to insert a puppet backdoor candidate in Kamala Harris (or maybe still Hillary Clinton) place the United States on a war footing with China, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba and others?

Yes. To all of it.

Is a law enforcement remedy appropriate for any of this?


In his role as Commander in Chief, was the President’s plan always to bridge the American people from a CCP reality to a new era of American prosperity by leveraging his constitutional authority to direct the US military accordingly?

Yes. It was the only way.

As we close, take note that this will get uglier before it gets prettier and it could get real ugly. Dark. Ominous. But then again, liberty, freedom and justice require a price; sometimes paid in blood.

As the last due process remedies exhaust, it will come time to place the bridge. I think we’re all ready to cross it and forge ahead to the other side and all in the name of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


Bonus Item(s) – Who Is Ike Brown?

Ike Brown laid the foundation for the 2020 election outcome beginning in the early 1970s when at the age of 17, he began registering Noxubee County, Mississippi voters.

Here is an update containing hope from Sidney Powell.

More concerning developments that align with information from my sources, including feet on the ground at ground zero. The angles of “going dark” as responsive to pressure started to manifest back in March and we touched on it then.

The End All, Be All

The “End All, Be All” case is how Jordan Sekulow recently described the Texas case against Pennsylvania and Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia. In the past few tumultuous days, we’ve seen one Pennsylvania case denied by the US Supreme Court because it was rendered moot by a case brought by the State of Texas and subsequently docketed. Noteworthy is that the four states are now compelled to respond to the suit by this Thursday.

Before moving in a second direction, we must preface it with a longstanding position. That’s the long-play objective for the President’s enemies to delay all important matters, including the vote result from the stolen 2020 election, past inauguration day and whereby continuity of government protocols would be leveraged to insert Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi into the presidency; while ousting Trump and Pence. Tonight we gain clarity on their contingency or fail-safe plan in that regard and the news is supposed to break on Friday, according to the source, Tore @TweetWordz.

We said in July that Inauguration Day on 20 Jan 21 was the most important date on the calendar with that in mind, suppose that somehow the President is able to emerge victorious from it all and without gutting the whole thing and prosecuting them all – every last one of them. All that does is reload 2016-2020.

It would be like playing essentially the same hand of cards over again. That is but one of a number of simple justifications to gut it all. But if that were to happen, here’s what to expect according to Tore – another impeachment. There is even stated to be the existence of written documentary evidence of this impeachment trap that is situated in a lie in wait posture. We’ll apparently learn more on Friday.

Before that, though, PA, MI, WI and GA will submit their responses to the US Supreme Court by 1500 EST. This falls back on another longstanding premise centered on the looking glass or the discovery process.

Sidney Powell began leveraging it during the Flynn case to deliver needed evidence to the public spectrum. That process will continue in this case with SCOTUS and it should envelop the rampant voter fraud and associated criminality that most certainly ties back to China respective to all four states.

It’s important to recall here that the Texas case is founded on the bulk of evidence from all of the previous Trump litigation ergo, Powell, Wood and Giuliani vector in here.

This is from yesterday and it goes deeper containing a second and longer thread tying the looking glass to Flynn and Powell back to June. More importantly, it introduces the Texas case.

Since the President’s enemies’ fail-safe plan involves taking the stolen election narrative and reshaping it as a function of Trump’s supposed wrongdoing and whereby this presents a constitutional avenue to impeach the President again but with new claims of election interference, he has no choice but to gut it. Fully gut it. No?

Otherwise this is all for naught.

So what will SCOTUS do?

Here’s what I postulated previously; standing by it with a strong suggestion that it is likely to happen. Once again, it’s constitutional in nature.

The Supreme Court does not desire to take a decisive posture in this contested election; even in the light of copious amounts of irrefutable evidence. No one wants to see the election decided by the Court; especially The People and if for no other reason than for the reason that the Framers made it so.

Giving it back to the people becomes difficult, though. The rampant and intentional voter fraud still requires a legal remedy to erase the detrimental impact on the integrity of the vote. It becomes difficult here to both have your cake and eat it, too.

Logical deduction respective to the filing tell us that the more likely avenue may be to expect a ruling that would return the vote to we, The People, but in representative fashion as afforded by the 12th Amendment.

How many times have you heard the President claim that he’s returning the power to the people? Remember, the House is the People’s House. Perhaps his message was an implicit but intentional one..

I saw one recapitulation from Pam Bondi suggestive of a compulsory component requiring each state to submit its one House vote along party lines; however, this work from @PrayingMedic demonstrates that there appears to be no party line component and that’s how we read it as well.

Before we close, think back to the level of infiltration that had to occur in order to compromise judges, election officials, governors, attorneys general, secretaries of state, etc. across the local, county and state levels as compounded by the leviathan corrupt federal apparatus. This explains what Obama was doing for eight years as he “fundamentally changed” America, no?

Don’t forget this very important – if not most important – point. The end runs around Constitutional protections mainly occurred at the local, county & state levels. Election laws were changed outside of state legislatures and before the election. For one, that tells us that federalism most certainly cuts both ways as we pointed to at the very beginning of all of this and for another, it reminds us of the importance of our sense of civic duty; especially relative to local and state engagement.

We’ll close on this note – 18 other states have joined the Texas suit and Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia are stacking their deck as well; making this all the more constitutionally weighty; and as if it could get more so.

With a divided nation being further divided by a fraudulent MSM narrative that Joe Biden is somehow president-elect, we stand upon a precipice of a legitimate second civil war and know that dark plans lie in wait in the backdrop. The violence will be unlike any seen perhaps ever and by design. My nickel is on this getting ugly within a short window and I’m refraining from attaching the exact timeline I have in mind if only for the sake of those types of predictions always blowing-up.

A friend of mine asked me today what I thought the percentage of a Trump second term would be. I responded simply with this.



Bonus Items

You can track SCOTUS in re Texas HERE.

Recommended speech from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (make sure to take-in the very last one – last two are about a minute long.)

Respective of that speech, consider these (each about a minute.)

Pelosi Continuity of Government Plan Relative to Interesting Trump Comments Clouds Barr Picture

The Trump, Barr, Wood, Powell and Giulani dynamic continues to bewilder and muddy the waters relative to sorting out both the four-year backdrop to the stolen 2020 election as well as the election itself. When William Barr was first named as Jeff Sessions’ successor as the Attorney General, my outlook was hopeful and I was determined to believe that he was the real McCoy. Over time and as caused by the obvious and complete dearth of anything resembling appropriate and legal remedies to that treasonous backdrop, the position on Barr has deteriorated and to a point where we currently reside.

Even so and having extended the benefit of the doubt to Barr, the door was left ajar for him to walk through and restore his “real McCoy” status to which we first ascribed. Lin Wood further compounded the already unclear picture in what must be tantamount to poor communications from the White House. Therein, Wood assailed Barr directly and publicly called for his termination only to learn that Barr’s statements were apparently misquoted and that a retraction was in order, which he made.

Before moving forward, there is much to know about Barr assuming it’s not already familiar information. In the short term, this sequence of articles (featured below latest to earliest) should be consumed and understood for proper backdrop. In the long term, the website has over 20 additional articles that speak to Barr’s apparently allegiance to institutional preservation over serving the DOJ, the rule of law and the President in the face of the outright treason he faces.

Staple Street Capital to UBS to China
Trump Card Barred – Declassification?
Baffling Barr Backs Down Again – Insufficient Voter Fraud Evidence to Affect Election Result
Flynn/McInerney Interview: Critical Confirmations Across the Board
Did China Steal the Keys to the Castle? Do Dominion, Smartmatic, Sequoia & HSBC Tie Stolen Election to California PERS?
Dominion: From Barr, Kirkland and Ellis to Comey, HSBC
What Did AG William Barr Know About Dominion Acquisition?
The Gravity of Inauguration Day Bears Down

Succinctly, here are the two scenarios that build on this information: 1) Barr has assumed and complete lie in wait posture for his entire tenure at DOJ as predicated on a comprehensive plan that would entail gutting the entire thing but not until after the commission of the crime is complete (that’s element that must be fulfilled as seen through the prosecutorial lens and in this case, it’s the stolen election because that is the long-run objective in all of this), which is accomplished by the certification of the election and perhaps even the 14 Dec 20 electoral college vote -or- 2) Barr has assumed a posture to deliver just enough traction to drag everyone along in an effort to reach inauguration day without any substantive adjudication of anyone thus comporting with the Deep State “DELAY IS THE PLAY!” strategy. None of this resembles anything new.

With the collective waters being further muddied over the course of the past day or so, President Trump remarked this morning in a way that delivered more uncertainty. Before considering what the President stated, we have to understand Barr’s previous remarks and this is extracted from our last article.

Now let’s consider the President’s remarks.

Take note that the President directly references one of the two scenarios outlined above, so we can mark this as a confirmation and one that may shed light on Barr’s overarching posture. Specifically, Trump acknowledged the first scenario that the evidence hasn’t been examined yet. This is a good development because it explains the inaction from Barr and positively so germane to the President’s interests.

The President is tipping his hand when he responded to the question, “Do you still have confidence in Bill Barr?” remarking, “Ask me that in a number of weeks from now.” This bodes well for Barr (Durham) and it speaks directly to what we began to outline in July – the the long-play isn’t actually stealing the election for the sake of stealing it, but rather to force a delay to inauguration day without a vote result and with the intent of invoking continuity of government protocols to remove the President and install House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who is number two in succession (Pence [#1 in succession] would also be removed because it’s an electoral matter.) I outlined all of that back in July.

From today, consider this.

Here is the relative video from July and know that it moves a bit slowly to allow time to consume what is presented. Pay very careful attention to what is said and what is outlined.

We’re not done, though. The President then comes back to the other crux issue underpinning this all and it’s the determination as to whether or not the actions by the President’s enemies are appropriate to justify civil or criminal litigation. So, although the Trump indicates that Barr as a prosecutor (criminal) may be fruitful in the coming weeks, this sounds like Trump goading Barr into action.

In the United States and with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) set aside, there are two primary vectors for litigation: criminal and civil (non-criminal.) Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Lin Wood are attorneys working in the civil domain and on behalf of the President but relative to the same issues. Where is Barr on the criminal side? That’s what the President is asking light of the abundance of evidence already available. Where are those criminal prosecutions?

It seems we should ask him that and revisit Barr “a number of weeks from now.”

The President ended his remarks abruptly circling back to the stolen election and the totality of his comments should be taken relative to his public address from yesterday.

As our older and wiser team member continues to remind us, can “D5” (looking at you, Q types) be anything other than December 5th? That’s in two days. We could be wiser then or it may take to 14 Dec 20 or even to 20 Jan 21.

Regardless, we’re at the precipice and it either breaks for America or China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Spain, Germany and more.


Staple Street Capital to UBS to China

This article is a brief but critically important augmentation to foundational research pertaining to the stolen 2020 election and the Dominion/Smartmatic matter underpinning it relative to Attorney General William Barr, the DOJ and whether or not we’ll see anything in the way of an appropriate legal remedies.

Here is a rundown (latest to earliest) of the aforementioned foundational research that should be consumed and understood to fully comprehend the implications of what follows:

Trump Card Barred – Declassification?
Baffling Barr Backs Down Again – Insufficient Voter Fraud Evidence to Affect Election Result
Flynn/McInerney Interview: Critical Confirmations Across the Board
Did China Steal the Keys to the Castle? Do Dominion, Smartmatic, Sequoia & HSBC Tie Stolen Election to California PERS?
Dominion: From Barr, Kirkland and Ellis to Comey, HSBC
What Did AG William Barr Know About Dominion Acquisition?

In short, our work left-off at Staple Street Capital, which had acquired Dominion in 2018 and whereby AG William Barr had been positioned at Kirkland & Ellis, the law firm advising Staple Street on the acquisition. It’s also important to note here that HSBC Toronto managed to secure 18 different Dominion patents that represent the technical and functional capacity to effectively penetrate and manipulate US elections by means of Dominion/Smartmatic systems and software. HSBC is Chinese-owned ergo China bought those patents.

Thanks to a tip (post) from Lin Wood, we learn that China bought more than just the patents. They bought the entire company.

The following work is from BillLawrenceOnline and it completes this picture for us so I’m relying on it entirely. Picking back up with Staple Street we take a short journey straight to China. Here’s what we learn.

The ramifications of this could be profound (should be profound.) To understand the full scope of it, I encourage to you work through the articles posted above if you haven’t already.

The 2020 election occurred with Dominion/Smartmatic systems in use and the genesis of Dominion/Smartmatic draws back to the Venezuelan government. Now we factor in that Dominion has been acquired by China (UBS) and whereby the patents to those same systems were previously acquired by China (HSBC Toronto) and whereby China deliberately launched a bio-weapon of mass destruction against the US so as to construct the landscape that was necessary to leverage those acquisitions.

All of that happened while AG Barr was situated at Kirkland & Ellis, the firm guiding the original sale of Dominion to Staple Street and whereby Barr now, as AG, either stated or misstated recently that he’s not “seen” election fraud rising to the level such that it could affect the 2020 vote result. This is the same Barr that recently and quietly appointed John Durham as special counsel to investigate Crossfire Hurricane, but 4 years too late and in a capacity that now stands to compromise President’ Trump’s ability to move forward with declassification.

That’s where we are. That’s the picture to be understood. Who in the hell is William Barr and whom does he represent? Dominion/Smartmatic/China or Trump and the American people.

Building up to all of this, the door had been left ajar for Barr to alter the inexcusable inactive reputation he has built for himself. That door was then shut and subsequently re-opened based upon Lin Wood’s direct call to fire Barr yesterday followed by his retraction that wasn’t really a retraction. So the door is still ajar for Barr but I’m not holding my breath. Spots and leopards – those spots are hard to change and his have looked the same for a long time.

So, the jury is still out and we’re 49 days from inauguration day with a fake president-elect in Joe Biden and an enigmatic AG who can’t or won’t see evidence because he’s blind, compromised or assuming a lie in wait posture that has been years in the making.



Trump Card Barred – Declassification?

Yesterday was a wild day and it saw the President’s attorney, Lin Wood, making a drastic post on Twitter directly calling for President Trump to fire Attorney General William Barr. That may be unprecedented in contemporary US history; and it certainly is when factoring in the circumstances of the stolen 2020 election. The requisite backdrop, including Wood’s original post and his retraction that didn’t really sound like a retraction, should be consumed here before moving forward.

The matter of declassification has been an important one for four years now and it is incumbent upon all of us to recall this development dating back to 13 May 19.

Here are the relevant takeaways from this statement:

  • “At the request and recommendation of the Attorney General” meaning that this was not initiated by Mr. Trump but Mr. Barr ergo his motivation for such deserves intense scrutiny. The genesis of this is important because it speaks to means, motive, access and opportunity through the prosecutorial lens. Why did Mr. Barr request this authority from the President? Was it to preserve the appearance of impartiality on behalf of the President or was it for some ulterior reason like preserving a necessary lever to facilitate institutional preservation?
  • “The Attorney General has also been delegated the full and complete authority to declassify information” meaning that the President no longer possess authority in the matter of declassification relative to the subject matter outlined, which pertains to the efforts to spy on Trump’s 2016 campaign and then moving through the 2017 transition process and onward (it never stopped; in fact it expanded.) The investigation that launched all of this as the entry point was the investigation into Lt. General Michael Flynn (FLYNN FIRST!) and that investigation was branded “Crossfire Hurricane.”
  • “…in accordance with the long-established standards for handling classified information” meaning that the existing rules and regulations apply in this matter, as would be expected, and they must be understood.

Building on all of that, here’s the development that stands to fundamentally alter the landscape in negative fashion and it comes from one of my most reliable sources and the best technical analysis for my nickel, Conservative Tree House/Sundance. The development itself was revealed within the context of the AP interview with Barr (last article) where he referenced his October assignment of John Durham as special counsel. The subject matter? “Crossfire Hurricane.”

Working up to this point, our website has well over 20 articles calling out Mr. Barr for his evident practice of institutional preservation in lieu of appropriate legal remedies to all that has plagued the Trump administration (investigations, indictments, arrests and prosecutions). That’s important to understand when considering the following.

Think back to the dynamics that shaped the DOJ during the lengthy Mueller investigation: Sessions recused himself, Mueller was a 3-legged wobbly stool that was a figurehead in name only, and Andrew Weissmann was both running the Mueller team and serving as the de facto AG essentially running the entire DOJ during the all of the Mueller probe. Why? Because the scope of that investigation touched everything coming into the DOJ that was of importance at the time.

Remember, investigations are opened for one of two purposes: a) to reveal crimes and prosecute crimes -or- b) to conceal crimes and then seal away evidence of those crimes.

Why is all of that important? Because the scope of Durham’s new appointment as special prosecutor now encompasses the materials President Trump intends to declassify.

Now ask yourself two things: 1) Why hasn’t the AG acted AT ALL in the last several years to formulate anything resembling appropriate remedies as described and 2) Why did he request and receive full and complete authority over relevant (the most important) declassification materials?

All of this positions Barr to potentially leverage the SC appointment to deny declassification and then he can wash his hands of it by saying that he’s doing so only to serve the President. Talk about duplicity, if that’s the case. So far, Barr, Huber, Durham, et al have delivered precisely nothing save a paltry Kevin Clinesmith (most Americans have never heard of him.) Do we expect that to change? Is this a ruse? Did Barr just bar the trump card (declassification)?

The dynamics are different with this SC assignment, which occurred quietly in October, since the fact sets and evidence are old and mostly known. The lion’s share of the details have already been aired-out in the MSM writ large so how is this incredibly late SC appointment representative of giving fidelity to the cause? How is it an effective remedy presuming that the findings of such an investigation would be rendered moot if Biden were inaugurated and the results delivered thereafter? Institutional preservation rears its head.

All of this draws back on “long-established standards for handling classified information.” What do those look like? Do they present both a mechanism and a timeline that serve the President or do they preclude him from playing the one and only trump card that he has maintained up his sleeve for so long? It doesn’t look good.

At this point, we fall back on Executive Order 13526 signed by Barack Obama on 29 Dec 09 and from it we learn that, “Delegations of original classification authority shall be reported or made available by name or position to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office.”

What stands-out immediately are Bradley’s ties to both a prominent Democrat and the Central Intelligence Agency; recalling that the overarching coup d’etat is an intelligence community operation that runs through the Gang of 8, SSCI, HPSCI and the US Senate; and with the dirty work occurring in the House. Treasonous division of labor, I suppose, but think about how the treason was layered and distributed through the nebulous governmental leviathan so as to mire the details in red tape and make them difficult to find. Pro-tip: we found them.

In all of this, it’s also important to remember that the transition from Dan Coats (ODNI) to interim-based Rick Grennell to now John Ratcliffe is absolutely critical because it overcame a known impediment to declassification in Coats. That should be viewed as the first obstacle to Trump declassifying. Overcoming it set the stage for Trump to be able to play the highest card in the deck, or did it? Coats’ resignation was effective 28 Aug 19 leaving a little over a year to declassify between his departure and Grennell’s arrival. That didn’t happen at the moment, we’re 49 days out from inauguration day with a new declassification obstacle presented.

From the EO,

“It is presumed that information that continues to meet the classification requirements under this order requires continued protection. In some exceptional cases, however, the need to protect such information may be outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information, and in these cases the information should be declassified. When such questions arise, they shall be referred to the agency head or the senior agency official. That official will determine, as an exercise of discretion, whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the damage to the national security that might reasonably be expected from disclosure.”


Right now and as it stands, Barr possess that sole authority. Moreover,

If the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office determines that information is classified in violation of this order, the Director may require the information to be declassified by the agency that originated the classification. Any such decision by the Director may be appealed to the President through the National Security Advisor. The information shall remain classified pending a prompt decision on the appeal..


The declassification process then, is rendered down to Barr and Bradley coalescing to determine a discretionary process. Let me remind you, Barr’s discretion thus far has delivered zero indictments, arrests or prosecutions that matter.

Now consider the DOJ’s longstanding practice of not commenting on ongoing investigations; especially when it may compromise sources, methods, evidence, etc. If the DOJ doesn’t comment on ongoing investigations and appropriately so, what makes us think they’ll declassify evidence and present it to the public in the middle of an investigation branded as a special counsel; especially in light of the totality of circumstances?

Recall this from the last article in reference to Barr’s 3-hour meeting with Trump on Tuesday, “Three hours is a long time. Were they discussing how to transition to Jeffrey Rosen, the Deputy Director of the DOJ or were they discussing a possible lie in wait posture that an inexcusably inactive Barr may have taken for the past few years, but how that’s about to come to an abrupt halt?”

I don’t know the answer to that question and judging Barr by his track record only makes that answer more difficult to find. We’ll leave it here for now and with the understanding that it will be further closely examined.

I do know this. On 23 May 19, when he received authority for declassification and according to Fox News, he said this,

““I think spying did occur. The question is whether it was adequately predicated,” Barr testified last month, adding that he believed it is his “obligation” to review whether there was misconduct in the original investigation. “Congress is usually very concerned with intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies staying in their proper lane.””


It seems Barr vacated his own responsibility and delegated it to Durham and he did so about 4 years late.

Did Barr bar the Trump card?