BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA, BIG MONEY: Full Circle to the D.C. Swamp Part II – Political Contributions by BlackRock and Vanguard

As of late, the writing at Moonshine has taken the form of recapitulating old positions in light of new evidence to present a broader and more comprehensive understanding to the complex, intricate, nebulous, vast, deep, wide and treasonous effort by a Globalist cabal determined to undo the United States in favor of “building it back better” by refashioning her into a socialist, Marxist and communist hell hole. Early on in all of it and back in late 2019/early 2020 I advised that our emerging catalog of developing work would age like fine wine and I stated this as others were still trying to parse it all out as if the “pandemic” were anything but entirely fraudulent. My statement about fine wine holds truer now than it did then.

In a substantially heavy lift yesterday (about 18 hours worth diagramming and writing in basically one sitting), we accomplished several substantial objectives: 1) In a complete review of existing work and presenting 29 cataloged articles in the backdrop of it, I mapped-out the entities and individuals we’ve identified from all of the relevant vectors and how they are enmeshed together, 2) We re-established President Trump’s 3 primary markers on the generational political continuum (BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA & BIG MONEY), 3) We threaded that effort through from China and its One Belt, One Road doctrine to the end point in private equity with BlackRock and Vanguard Group, 4) We bridged to work from Dr. Joseph Mercola at The Defender relative to BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA and 5) we focused on the circular flow of money that is normally inherent in fraudulent constructs.

The discovery of the newer Mercola article during research allowed me to shift the focus of that article as I wrote it and in so doing, I sarcastically left open the question about our likely circular flow of money; and remembering that it would most likely occurr within the energy sector, as established. I closed that piece with three endings and here are two,

Or, perhaps this is the best one and as I said before, hell, we’re talking BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA under the same precarious-to-find ownership by BIG MONEY and BIG MEDIA is driving the company message or shall we say, force-feeding Kool-Aid elixir to the people. Now, pick up that heaping pile of shit and thrown it squarely into the middle of the D.C. swamp.

Is it even worth looking at the original intent here? Remember what it was? Determining whether there is a circular flow of money relative to campaign donations from BIG PHARMA. 

What do you think? 

Oh yeah, Bill Barr is worth $40-$74 million. 

And Wray? $23-$40 million circa 2017. 

You tell me.

The answer is yes – it’s DEFINITELY worth examining so let’s get to it. As we do, remember that our premise is absolute control of all relevant vectors by ownership via private equity and atop all of it and including BIG PHARMA – our focus today – is BlackRock and Vanguard.

Moving forward, it’s important to recall a presumed fact relative to the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and it’s as simple as saying that a cohort of good forces and likely including military ones “un-rigged” the 2016 election to deliver a legitimate win in an outlier president in Trump. That one aspect is explanatory for so many anomalies that many can’t seem to get right and it’s because they’re working with the wrong details.

Acknowledging that the 2016 election rests on a generational political continuum devised to infiltrate and overthrow the U.S. government for the Globalist cabal, we establish that forces working to this extent fully expected Clinton to give a victory speech on election night and when she couldn’t, they were entirely caught-out – ENTIRELY caught out. This short Ben Rhodes video is the absolute best descriptor to understand this critical dynamic.

So what does this dynamic tell us? It tell us that “the swamp” expected, knew and planned for a Clinton victory because that’s how it was predetermined. It also tells us that when things are predetermined in a place like D.C., the evidence of the money will either confirm or deny it. So we follow the money and in this case, we start by examining campaign contributions for 2016.

By industry, BIG PHARMA is outside of the top five contributors but it matters not relative to the private equity ownership of BIG PHARMA and that’s where BlackRock and Vanguard bear down with fully might.

Immediately we latch onto private equity (“Securities & Investments”), law firms and of course, energy (“Oil and Gas”). In particular, remember that I have established ENERGY as the conduit to move money and the Biden crime family brokered one private equity deal in energy after another. These core components to all things are intricately delineated in our primary diagram above.

From the same source, consider that in 2016,

Who did those donors expect to win? Clinton or Trump?

More specific to BIG PHARMA and as sourced from CNN, you tell me – which one of these BIG PHARMA recipients appears to be the outlier and which one appears to be the predetermined winner?

Understand an important underpinning element here and it’s one we’ve detailed before. Prior to the 2016 election, Clinton was pushing a prescription drug plan antithetical to the financial interests of BIG PHARMA and specifically, it sought to force lower prescription drug prices by means of legislation.

Factor that into the equation as you examine the contributions by candidate above. Who do you think BIG PHARMA expected (knew) would win?

From the article (emphasis mine),

Their biggest recipient? Clinton. She collected $336,416 in donations, over a third of the total contributions during the 2016 presidential campaign. The next biggest recipient was Republican candidate Jeb Bush, who collected less than half the amount of Clinton. Trump received the least in donations: $1,010, enough to buy one Daraprim pill.

To the fraud investigator, this manifests as an expression of intent.

If we consider health care on a broader scope and inclusive of BIG PHARMA, it pushes “healthcare” into the top 3 donors.

That’s important for what you see outlined here. I established early on that a series of diagnostic memos issued by the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) to medical providers writ large baked into the construct financial incentives for medical providers to diagnose COVID-19 over the underlying co-morbidities actually responsible for patients’ illnesses.

How or why is that important? It provides a robust system of fraudulent financial rewards to incentivize desired diagnoses in order to generate the needed data drivers for the fraudulent pandemic. Or, in other words, the NIAID/Collins/NIH/Fauci/NVSS cohort – the cohort that controls FUNDING – was literally paying doctors in federal dollars to deliver the data by means of the diagnosis.

From OpenSecrets.org, consider these election cycle data points for 2016, 2018 and 2020. We’ll begin with an overview.

OVERVIEW: 2016, 2018 & 2020 ELECTION CYCLE CONTRIBUTIONS

Immediately we draw a distinction between 2020 and the other years as 2020 stands-out as anomalous for its exponential increase in contributions relative to 2016 and 2018.

I don’t believe in coincidences just like I didn’t when Obama de-funded the CDC at the same time he increased funding to the WHO prior to leaving office and as comporting with the 2017 timeline we kick like a dead horse (and for good reason) and specifically the date Obama inserted the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic construct into the Trump administration during compulsory transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. Like I said, I don’t believe in coincidences.

We also note that this is NOT a partisan issue rather, it’s an American issue as the culpability in all of it is reflected in the flow of money and electoral expectations appear to shape how that money flows.

Grabbing onto 2008 as comporting with Obama’s 2009 inauguration, we see a rough 50/50 split right up to 2020 and the 27 Dec 19 first report of the COVID-19 outbreak in the MSM. Notably in 2020, the rough 50/50 split shifts heavily in favor of the Democrats 62/38. Dead horse – I don’t believe in coincidences in as as much as money talks and bullshit walks.

Another notable data point is that BIG PHARMA ramped up contributions in 2016 to an unprecedented high of $64.9mm, then tapped the brakes in 2018 dropping to $44.6mm only to explode to a new all time high in 2020 of $89.6mm after the “unrigged” Trump victory. Following these contributions, the 2020 election was stolen and in a spate of treason, Trump was removed from office illegitimately. Dead horse; no coincidences.

We have one more overview data point to delineate and it is substantial and significant and it rests on another Moonshine position that underpins everything – the generational continuum or timeline. On that continuum, we situate the events of 9/11 and the subsequent “Patriot Act” as a sequential step that would lead to the COVID-19 “fake pandemic” construct. So, let’s see if the money evidences our position because it always does.

Between 1990-1998, BIG PHARMA contributions ranged from a relatively paltry $1.8mm to a more substantial $9.6mm. On the lead-up to 11 Sep 01 during the 2000 election cycle, we note a substantial increase from $8.7mm in 1998 to $19.1mm in 2000.

The 2000-2001 time frame sets a new benchmark for BIG PHARMA contributions as double digits become the norm increasing to $22.4mm in 2002. Dead horse; no coincidences.

The flow of the money supports the assertion(s.)

Are those increases accidental or enmeshed in the generational continuum I’ve worked so diligently to establish? Rhetorical question. It can’t be any other way in light of the full body of evidence we’ve established.

Let’s take a closer look at the election cycle contributions year over year.

2016

2018

2020

BLACKROCK & VANGUARD

With BlackRock and Vanguard Group central to all things here, they represent the bridge to private equity at the same time they serve as the holders of the corporations making contributions to U.S. political campaigns. BlackRock and Vanguard sit atop BIG MONEY and BIG MONEY owns BIG MEDIA and BIG TECH and they’re funding the politicians to deliver on established plans.

With that in mind, let’s dial down on the 20 top BIG PHARMA contributors in the stolen 2020 election and see if the positions align (with emphasis on vaccine manufacturers).

D.E. Shaw Research: private
Pulse Biosciences: owned by BlackRock (1), Vanguard (2)
Pfizer Inc.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Masimo Corp.: owned by BlackRock (1), Vanguard (2)
Alexion Pharmaceuticals: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Roche Holdings: Roche Holding AG (ROG.SW) is owned by Vanguard (1, 2)
Amgen Inc.: owned by BlackRock (1), Vanguard (2)
Johnson & Johnson: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
AbbVie Inc.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Abbott Laboratories: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Merck & Co.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Starkey Hearing Technologies: private
Eli Lilly & Co.: owned by Vanguard (2), BlackRock (3)
Medtronic Inc.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Synchrogenix: private
Bristol-Meyers Squibb: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
AmeriSource Bergen Corp.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Vital Pharmaceuticals: private
Novartis AG: owned by Vanguard (2, 5, 9, 10) [mutual funds]
AstraZeneca PLC: owned by Vanguard (1, 3, 6, 7) [mutual funds]

We began today’s endeavor by picking up where we left off yesterday – with BlackRock and Vanguard Group sitting atop private equity and having a spoon in about every single pot and especially so relative to BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY and as we know, they come to represent BIG MONEY on its face.

Today we delineated the financial and statistical anomalies relative to campaign contributions collectively and year over year and in light of yesterday’s work, what did we learn?

We learned that the same BIG MONEY forces – BlackRock and Vanguard – that drawn down, own and fund about everything were essentially the exclusive BIG PHARMA donors to the COVID-19 pandemic, the stolen 2020 election and all of the corrupt, criminal, seditious and treasonous politicians responsible for the ills that plague this once great and proud constitutional republic that now more closely resembles the shit hole banana republic they desire.

All of this – Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection” event and impeachment 2.0 – ultimately draws down on BlackRock and Vanguard Group and relative to that, don’t forget what I’ve reminded folks of times over and as revisited again yesterday where Mercola put it in his words,

The regulations in private equity make investigating it difficult and by most accounts, these corrupt politicians have their personal attorneys and financial advisors obscuring their investments in blind trusts. Still though and in the always persistent mode of identifying verifiable fraud with the circular flow of money, the next endeavor is identifying which politicians have holdings in BlackRock and Vanguard.

Regardless, about everything we’ve seen from these miscreants including our list of Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection” event and impeachment 2.0 is patently and abjectly demonstrable as FRAUD as much as it is sedition and treason and it all appears to have been funded by BlackRock and Vanguard.

I’ll leave you with this as Mercola so astutely indicated in his article,

The point being, if I’m wrong about all of this, then why did BlackRock and Vanguard see to it that that defining ownership would be nearly impossible? It’s because the entire system is fraudulent and rigged for them to accomplish stated nefarious objectives.

Can anyone prove that it isn’t?

-End-

BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA, BIG MONEY: Full Circle to the D.C. Swamp

On 17 Jun 21, the Biden administration announced its intent to allocate $3 billion from the ‘Save America Plan’ to invest in antiviral medications relative to COVID-19 and the patently and demonstrably fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic and the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Antiviral medications are generally taken orally and early in the infection timeline to mitigate the illness. Given the abundance of tedious and arduous investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic and our respective findings, through the lens of a fraud investigator, the decision raises several important questions but none more important than asking if this might be a circular flow of money.

The following were extracted from the NIAID/NIH press release,

Thanks to the American Rescue Plan, the Biden Administration is investing more than $3 billion to accelerate the discovery, development and manufacturing of antiviral medicines as part of the Biden Administration’s whole-of-government strategy to develop the next generation of COVID-19 treatments. 

Through collaboration within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), this plan – called the ‘Antiviral Program for Pandemics‘ – will respond to the urgent need for antivirals to treat COVID-19 by spurring the availability of medicines to prevent serious illness and save lives. It also will build sustainable platforms for discovery and development of antivirals for other viruses with pandemic potential, helping better prepare the nation to face future viral threats.

This plan accelerates and expands the Administration’s ongoing efforts to support clinical trials to test prioritized drug candidates for COVID-19 and to support the advanced development of promising therapies. Working through an unprecedented public-private partnership called ACTIV (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutics and Vaccines), 19 therapeutic agents have been prioritized for testing in rigorous clinical trials for outpatients and inpatients with COVID-19. Having additional FDA-authorized antiviral medicines available within a year would be a major breakthrough in ongoing efforts to combat COVID-19 and protect the public, which is why last week the Administration announced it would procure more than 1.5 million regimens of a Merck investigational antiviral treatment, should it receive emergency use authorization.

Three billion is a lot of money and our work has already established private equity as the mechanism and energy as the sector where in combination, they provide for the conduit to move money relative to the broader political continuum, which consists of paralleling, serving and often reciprocating constructs like Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection” event and impeachment 2.0. Those are only the larger elements and there are multitudes of other aspects like FISA abuse that we omit out of brevity.

BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY – those are President Trump’s markers for all of the fraud, corruption, crime, sedition and treason that currently have him on the outside looking in. Today, we’ll demonstrate how they all fit together in the established generational (contemporaneously, we like to begin the discussion around WWII) and overarching political continuum; and as bound by money and executed in private equity while exploiting the public-private interface. We’ll do this with a reminder that it’s far from a complete picture as previously researched and authored by a single person with only open sources available; and as informed by newly emerged information.

As an example of established work relevant here, what follows is the diagram of the construct for the criminal predicate focusing on the NIAID/Collins/NIH/Fauci cohort, et al as the ENTERPRISE. This is representative of the constructive and compartmentalized elements, processes and entities associated with the broader COVID-19 false flag construct. Relative to our discussion today, it can be excised out and inserted into the second diagram as one of the constructs resting on the overarching political continuum mentioned in our introduction.

Veteran Moonshiners are fully aware of the details associated with that diagram and without an understanding of them, it may be necessary to take an independent sidebar before moving forward. For deeper backdrop relative to the diagram, see this recent recapitulating article. If you’re feeling comfortable with the content and your water is clear, let’s heap a bunch of mud into it and murk it up a bit.

The diagram below requires some front loading followed by back-filling, is complex and there is no easy explanation of it. It is based on existing work (linked below) which consists of 29 articles.

Our primary diagram below begins top left with Chinese doctrine and specifically its infrastructure heavy approach in One Belt, One Road. I recently speculated on how China was going to leverage this doctrine and apply it to the United States with its proxy in Joe Biden and his looming U.S. infrastructure bill.

Digressing, it’s important to identify two primary components to One Belt, One Road – the Communist Chinese Party (CCP) and the CEFC China Energy Company (state-owned); and whereby the former is the political arm and the latter is (was) the economic arm. The obvious third head of the dragon would be the People’s Liberation Army (PLA.)

Opposite China in the top right corner, note the private equity entities of Vanguard and BlackRock and the tie-in to BIG PHARMA. In between and to the informed reader, you’ll see a slate of people, entities, nations and relationships. By means of position, title, appointment, selection, oversight, authority, representation, financial transaction, ownership, agreement or relevant other, we can interweave and connect all of the related entities to China, Vanguard and BlackRock.

That’s important for this reason. I began researching and compiling this article a couple of nights ago and for similar but slightly different reasons.

Mainly, I was focused on reviewing older research (some of which I haven’t compiled into articles) and narrowing in on Big Pharma and campaign contributions and how those elements may factor into the suspected circular flow of money that I was setting out to investigate.

After beginning the work and extending the research, I found an article that delivered the mother lode allowing us to broaden our scope and really deliver a haymaker of a piece that further galvanizes the exclusive positions we’ve been making for so long.

Let’s jump to the end so you can make some contextual sense of it as we go and then we’ll make some Moonshine in between to connect it all.

The piece comes from Dr. Joseph Mercola as published at The Defender and the article is entitled ‘Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess.’

Care to guess? Top right corner – Vanguard and BlackRock.

Finally, here’s the diagram.

In a recently written and monster-sized article that was picked-up and re-posted by Lin Wood and is entitled ‘Follow the Money‘, I deliver the payload for this diagram in terms of energy and private equity. The balance of it was derived mostly from the 29 articles I’ve linked.

A good starting point to understanding it is the $1.5 billion dollar deal that Hunter Biden brokered with the chairman of the CEFC after his dad dropped him off in China after flying over on Air Force 2. Upon landing, Hunter and Joe split ways and when they boarded to depart for stateside, the deal was in Hunter’s pocket right next to his crack pipe and his cell porn device.

We’re latching onto the 2017 timeline as we go.

From the linked article,

It’s this simple. In 2016 and upon exiting office (VPOTUS), Joe (and Jill) Biden’s income was $396,456.

For 2017-2019 and aligning on the same timeline as the deliberate release of a bio-WMD in Wuhan China; and dating back to October 2019 (as per the FBI); and as being first reported in the MSM on 27 Dec 19; the Biden’s income exploded exponentially to $16, 596,979.

Overall, that represents a 4086.34% increase in income for those 3 years combined; equating to an average annual increase in income of $5,532,326.33 at 1295.45%

That change is what we call a hockey stick line statistically and it is a hallmark indicator of fraud, just like these hockey sticks were.

Energy and private equity delivered a rather handsome pay raise for the Bidens. Take note of our 2017 timeline – our hockey stick increase begins then. What else was going on in 2017 – the most important time span in contemporaneous U.S. history?

For a much deeper understanding of this timeline that is imperative for appropriate backdrop, remember what I outlined in Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules. On our rough 2017 timeline, contiguous to it and beginning in 2014, Lisa Monaco at Department of Homeland Security co-issued a memo ordering a “security stand down” at all U.S. bio-containment facilities. I speculated that this was cover to off-shore prohibited gain of function work to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in light of emerging internal whistleblowers. Hold on to this because it will bear down again as we talk more about the 2017 timeline below.

So, yeah… Xoe Xiden’s pay increase comports precisely with all of that -above – as it began in 2017.

The balance of our complex primary diagram above rests on the notion that on a generational timeline, the United States was infiltrated from within by a coalescence of forces ranging from domestic operators to Operation Paperclip and the State Department’s sanctioned immigration of known Nazi war criminals (scientists, etc.) after World War II to more recent and widespread Chinese infiltration of U.S. institutions and critical sectors like education as one of many.

The train really got rolling with George H.W. Bush when relative to his entry into the CIA, the Kennedy assassination and moving forward, he ascended to the presidency to pave the way for everything that would follow and remembering that his grandfather, Prescott Bush, funded the Nazis in World War II.

From GWWB-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Trump-Biden and with Trump being the exception and the only reason we’re likely not already dead under Hillary’s watch, Trump was the anomaly; the outlier; the one who won because it was “unrigged” for him. Each presidency was a passing of the baton to the other; a set-up for the one that would follow hence our generational timeline.

The lion’s share of the work came on Obama’s watch as he “fundamentally change(d)” America. Obama received a 2009 executive order hand-off from George W. Bush that would permit Obama to rewrite U.S. biosecurity rules writ large. This resulted in a “fog of war” like haze respective to them – think cover by ambiguity and philosophy – and under that fog, gain of function work would be halted and off-shored in 2015 and into 2016. It was off-shored to the WIV and it began with the Monaco memo as noted above.

Once the gain of function work was off-shored, Obama was set and primed to move forward on the contiguous 2017 timeline.

Obama inserted the pandemic construct on 13 Jan 17 during compulsory presidential transition meetings. By doing so, he came nearly full circle on an 8-year blueprint.

When Obama came into office in January 2009, he sourced a the U.S. manual on counterinsurgency and mapped it over the U.S. It’s the bible for regime change perfected by decades of intelligence and military work primarily in the Middle East. That was Obama’s blue print. The one he mapped over the U.S. More recently, I revisited the older topic writing one two articles about it.

Obama’s investment into his blueprint application spanned both of his terms, facilitated everything he did and drives all of it right to the point where the rubber meets the road on the 2017 timeline .

From all of that, we gather that the final step to galvanize full control in this broader, generational continuum – the COVID-19 construct – could not be executed until all of the right people were installed in all of the right locations from the federal apparatus right on down to local voting precincts.

Once they were installed and normally in ways that entangled them previously and often years earlier and in abundantly complex fashion, COVID-19 could move forward as obfuscated and ushered in by impeachment 1.0. On an expedited timeline it began 27 Dec 19, I called bullshit then and I’ve been working it since.

Digressing and returning to our diagram.

The balance of the diagram – what lies between China/Xoe Xiden and Vanguard/BlackRock/BIG PHARMA – is the installation of all of those right people in all of those right places as we just laid-out for you briefly and as delivered in excruciatingly detailed in the 29 linked articles and on the website.

Our primary diagram also directly interfaces with earlier research into BIG MEDIA.

With our primary diagram being entirely based upon articles already written all of those details are waiting for you. Here’s a short list of them:

One two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve thirteen fourteen fifteen fifteen sixteen seventeen eighteen nineteen twenty twenty-one twenty-two twenty three twenty-four twenty-five twenty-six twenty-seven twenty-eight twenty-nine.

If your head is swimming, consider listening to the first couple of podcasts (I tried that shoe on for a bit) or taking-in these more recent articles which encapsulate and recapitulate most if not all of the 29 above: ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN. These are from the list of 29 and they won’t give you a full glass, but they’ll help understand the broader scope.

Onward.

I posted our diagram to examine it again before we move forward and hoping it rings a little clearer.

Going ahead, we rely on our Mercola piece from The Defender and all further images are sourced therein – the font in the extracts and the font for the website are similar, so beware.

Recapitulating, we began with the ending, which was BlackRock and Vanguard Group, and then I gave you a cursory level synopsis of the guts of it to get us to that end.

So with that end in hand, we bridge to Mercola with BlackRock and Vanguard Group.

I’ll make only a few notes where it’s appropriate to begin tying it all together because you won’t need them.

Assuming you are familiar with our work on COVID-19 and the political entanglements we have delineated relative to BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY and you’ve plugged-in what’s outlined here, Mercola’s work will fall neatly into place and connect in all of the areas you would expect it to.

I mean, hell, we’re talking BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA under the same precarious-to-find ownership by BIG MONEY and BIG MEDIA is driving the company message or shall we say, force-feeding Kool-Aid elixir to the people. Now, pick up that heaping pile of shit and thrown it squarely into the middle of the D.C. swamp and that’s the status quo. Nice job, America.

Mercola gets right to it – straight nuts and bolts and we get confirmations, connections, relationships and more in spades.

As you process all of the aforementioned and what is about to follow from Mercola, consider the confirmations we recently established in the previous article: 1) early pathogenic studies of SARS-CoV-2, 2) U.S. (and other) modeling of SARS-CoV-2, 3) U.S. funding of gain of function work stateside and in China, 4) involvement of U.S. agencies and organizations writ large, 5) gain of function research (bio-weaponization), 6) compromised U.S. individuals conspiring with China, 7) complicity by U.S. universities and professors, departments, etc., 8) evidence of broader biowarfare programs, 9) Chinese students in America working as “spies” for China, 10) Chinese funding to U.S. individuals in business and government, 11) entanglements in meetings with China and Russia, 12) China’s compromise and killing of intelligence assets working inside China.

Here, we continue riding COVID-19 into the Mercola piece with relevant aspects already highlighted for you (I advise reading the entire article).

TAKING NOTE OF THE ABOVE (!!!) we’ll pause and sympathize because it’s so difficult to wrap ones mind around all of this. I hope my explanations are accurate and helpful. The abundance of overlap in the work from Mercola germane to similar or identical findings from us hopefully helps tie all this together. Unfortunately and as noted by Mercola, there’s just never a good place to start, stop or stay when you’re trying to explain it all AND MAKE SENSE OF IT.

Back to Mercola.

Consider Mercola’s findings and understand that some of his missing pieces are essentially represented in the 29 articles I linked while his work mirrors some of our findings; while also giving us confirmations on older positions; and while also presenting new ones. What’s not in those articles you can likely find in the other 170 others on the website – we’ve covered substantial ground.

In essence and in light of the full catalog of Moonshine work relative to COVID-19, it allows us to stand at near full circle as it relates to having an accurate and detailed broader understanding of the who, what when where why and how of the status quo.

Perhaps this is the best summary conclusion for this article.

Let’s think about everything that has been outlined and then consider how I got to this very moment in time; to write this article and establish all of these connections through private equity.

I WAS EXAMINING THE BACKGROUNDS OF THEN ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR AND NOW FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER WRAY and I latched onto their resume timelines and their law firms in private practice further inspecting for conflicts of interest, political entanglements, etc. Identifying private equity trails, we moved to the present and here we are – standing full circle but acknowledging holes in the perimeter that need filling with additional work.

Or, perhaps this is the best one and as I said before, hell, we’re talking BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA under the same precarious-to-find ownership by BIG MONEY and BIG MEDIA is driving the company message or shall we say, force-feeding Kool-Aid elixir to the people. Now, pick up that heaping pile of shit and thrown it squarely into the middle of the D.C. swamp.

Is it even worth looking at the original intent here? Remember what it was? Determining whether there is a circular flow of money relative to campaign donations from BIG PHARMA.

What do you think?

Oh yeah, Bill Barr is worth $40-$74 million.

And Wray? $23-$40 million circa 2017.

You tell me.

Until next time, Godspeed.

-End-

Undo COVID-19 by Pressing the Predication ‘Easy Button’

An unfortunate and persistent feature of contemporary society and one that is particularly prominent in younger generations of Americans, is the short attention span. It’s a precariously dangerous dynamic wherein the next “shiny object” is always only moments away, always already queued up by the string pullers enshrouded in darkness and operating in the backdrop, and always with the capacity to move the masses in particular and desired directions. It matters not if you brand it the ‘herding of the sheep’, the ‘social programming’ of the proletariat or any other appropriate and applicable label. Rather, what matters is that it is tested, tried and true; unless of course, you’re keen on sipping the Moonshine.

An unfortunate and persistent outcome of the short attention span dynamic is the production and maintenance of what I call the feeble American mind, which often gets penned descriptively as ‘feeble minded Amerikans.’ Therein, ones own sense of learned helplessness can bear down with full might to drive a perpetual cycle of institutional preservation that keeps the sheep in their flock and the shepherds posted-up and minding them: Kennedy assassination, Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, 9/11, Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, a stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection”, impeachment 2.0, the installation of a Chinese proxy in Joe Biden, and the balance of this open-ended string of events. That is, unless, the forces of good eventually prevail in devastating form and soon.

Nothing is as frustrating as the one who is as intelligent as he is ignorant; ignorant of the correct details, that is. Those people occur voluminously, trend virtuously and without question, they and their blind faith in “authority” are leading their own kind and others to enslavement at best and slaughter at worst. They do it out of things like ‘systemic racism’, ‘climate change’, ‘orange man bad’ and a bunch of other literal fabricated and sown narrative constructs devised to perpetuate their own helplessness; and they are oblivious to it.

Are these positions too extreme to accurately characterize contemporary Americans and the status quo? Care to play devil’s advocate?

Consider that on 26 Aug 20, the CDC issued a press release revising away 94% of the bulk data used to justify and rationalize all of the federal guidelines and mitigations that devastated the nation, its people, its society and its economy. In layman’s terms, the CDC had retracted a months-long lie making it disappear with one swipe of the pen. Therein, 94% of the data they used was rendered fabricated and invalid. It was and continues to be demonstrable fraud. I couldn’t believe they actually released this data point but what I failed to consider is the power of the feeble Amerikan mind.

This was like catching fish in a barrel, I thought. The pandemic is over, I thought. The toothpaste is going back into the tube, I thought. I even wrote this article about it.

But what did Americans do after receiving this fortuitous news on 26 Aug 20 that was hardly reported? Not a God damned thing. Nope, rather they continued to act afraid. They continued consuming the wrong news and information. They continued wearing their masks and forcing them on their children. They continued following all of the pretend, made-up and flip-flopping rules until they were out of school, out of work and their businesses shuttered forever; like the sheep I’ve painted them to be.

What did Americans do on 12 May 21 and were they even aware of more troubling statistical developments from the CDC? Do Americans even know what even happened on that day?

On 12 May 21 and almost a year after the first gross revision, the CDC exacerbated the situation by issuing further notice that of all the bulk data it used to justify and rationalize mitigations and guidelines, only 5% now remained valid while 95% of the data were invalid and leveraged an average of 4.0 underlying co-morbidities.

In other words, the COVID-19 pandemic is only 5% valid and 95% invalid. I’ve covered about every granular aspect of how this occurred since roughly 27 Dec 19 – the first public report of the outbreak. Do you know what happens when you apply these percentages to the metrics the CDC was publishing?

It situates the entire COVID-19 pandemic squarely in the middle of regular seasonal flu as I’ve demonstrated over and over and over and over. Here’s a visual sample and following it we’ll pick back up.

I even wrote another article on it that very day.

What did Americans do after not one notice of demonstrable fraud, but two notices, and with a year in between to think about it and perhaps even challenge their own conventions to formulate a plan to redress it?

What did they do? Not a God damned thing.

Don’t lose hope, though, because we don’t effectively need all Americans on board the truth train – just enough of them to cross a threshold. Fortunately for us and in light of a mountain of evidence supporting our positions, we appear to be nearing that threshold if we’re not already there. This sums up the notion perfectly and hilariously and it gives us hope.

So then, what is the path forward? How do we redress the status quo and return an historically elected president to his rightful second term; and how do we do that before the Biden fraud train gets too far from the station to be returned? Is there an “easy button”?

It all starts with a walk backwards in time and a review of our timeline for the finer details. Therein, I’ll provide us with the “easy button” to push to end a pandemic that leverages a real bio-weaponized virus in the propagation of abundantly and demonstrably fraudulent data harvested and curated from underlying co-morbidities.

The “easy button” is something we call predication and it can be properly situated and properly removed. In the case of COVID-19, the predication was situated with patently fraudulent data and sown narrative and it can be removed by establishing verifiable fact sets that undermine these aspects. Establishing those fact sets is our mission today and we use timeline overlays to do it.

Timeline overlays make for formidable weapons devised at fleshing-out the truth. I began compiling a rudimentary and incomplete timeline years ago and it continues to serve us well. We’ll use it to understand the magnitude of a vital date in March 2020 and it’s something that no one ever talks about except for Moonshiners.

Importantly, understand that we are omitting most of the finer details here to make this conversation expedient and therefore, any missing gaps can be filled in by visiting the website and hunting them down. We move forward with meat and potatoes only.

As I previously reported, in late 2014, Lisa Monaco, who was then at Department of Homeland Security, co-issued a national security stand down at all U.S. bio-containment facilities that served as the false flag impetus to ensnare all U.S. gain of function work (bioweaponization) for the express purpose of off-shoring it to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. This occurred against the backdrop of internal U.S. whistleblowers shining a light on the controversial and prohibited work. The off-shoring of the work is also reflected below relative to U.S. funding of it, which followed as per then President Barack Obama and Anthony Fauci. Our recent work details the role of Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance relative to that funding. We’ll begin our timeline review there.

Consider how all of this unfolds sequentially and like I said, see how timeline overlays are formidable weapons; especially as it relates to those with short attention spans.

Why did Obama make changes to longstanding presidential transition law with roots drawing back to the Kennedy assassination in 1963? Why did Obama change these compulsory laws to augment them to guarantee the inclusion of pandemic preparedness? Why did Obama make that change unilaterally with an executive order (Public Law 113-146)?

Why did Obama increase funding to the WHO, which is funded and controlled by China, Bill Gates and others and why did he do this at the same time he decreased funding at our own CDC? Why did Obama cut CDC funding at the same time he wittingly left our cupboards bare of masks and ventilators? Was Obama clandestinely working to promote a planned pandemic or working to prevent an unseen one? Rhetorical questions.

Why would Biden establish needed pretext by rearing his head in peculiar pre-COVID-19 fashion to publicly go on record claiming that the U.S. was ill-prepared for a pandemic crisis? Why would Obama circle back to it post-presidency to chastise President Trump over it? Didn’t Obama and Biden just finish eight years in office whereby they could have diligently ensured that America was supremely prepared for any sort of prognosticated pandemic event and therefore be positioned to hand that off to the next incoming president? Isn’t that how it’s supposed to work and in the best interest of the American people?

If pandemic preparedness was so critical to national security, why did Obama and Biden leave America so woefully and inadequately prepared as they exited office? Isn’t that hypocritical and antithetical to common sense? Don’t Obama and Biden bear the culpability for any level of U.S. unpreparedness circa 2017 and forward? After all, they had 8 years and Trump was just warming up his seat. All rhetorical questions and all of it serving a known fraudulent construct.

Why did Anthony Fauci issue one of several pre-COVID-19 pandemic preparedness warnings just two days before the compulsory 13 Jan 17 transition meetings as augmented by Obama’s unilateral decree to include a pandemic preparedness exercise? Why did Obama’s White House coordinate the MSM release of the patently fraudulent Flynn/Russia narrative to preempt the meetings and deflect away from the newly minted pandemic concerns and why did this all overlap the need to renew expiring FISA warrants on Carter Page, which were extended despite being known to be improperly (illegally) predicated (there’s our word again but in a different context)?

Why was all of this going on at the same time and at the precise moment President Trump was executing Phase I of the bilateral trade deal with China – the hostile foreign nation that started an irregular, asymmetrical and undeclared third world war with its release of a bio-WMD? No one talks about this timeline but we Moonshiners. Everything you value and hold dear can now be drawn back to these exact moments.

Continuing with 2017.

Leaving off at 31 Jan 17, let’s insert a few items for your consideration before picking back up with 2019 below. Consider these.

How could the U.S. and other (allied?) nations be purchasing “COVID” specific supplies and materials as early as 2017 (the most important timeline in contemporary U.S. history) when “COVID” was not created as the applicable name until 11 Feb 20?

We pick back up at 2019.

Why is all of the aforementioned occurring as an overlay to the smuggling of SARS-CoV-2 strains to the WIV via dirty Harvard University professor Charles Lieber and his slate of Chinese foreign nationals who were conveniently Harvard students? Why was Nancy Pelosi recklessly mismanaging her unfounded impeachment at this precise moment? All rhetorical questions. Impeachment served as the deflection mechanism for the ushering in of COVID-19 and no one else has told you that except for Political Moonshine and we did so about a year and a half ago.

Why was Fauci – the so-called expert who we can now say with absolute and 100% certainty was directly involved with and funding gain of function research relative to this exact SARS-CoV-2 virus – issuing dire predictions that stood antithetical to his stand down, which advised that travel restrictions weren’t needed and that Americans shouldn’t be concerned at all? The only expert to issue advice like that is a corrupt, treasonous, criminal and murdering one devising for the propagation of a pandemic he had constructed and would manage. Otherwise the details are just fodder for idiots trying to find their mask and their 6 ft. measuring stick.

Here is where we begin to delineate the “easy button” strategy to undoing the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic and we do so resting on the notion that fraudulent constructs are just that – constructed. In statecraft, they are generally constructed by means of legislation or law ergo, by reversing course on the granular components that permit such construction, we can effectively deconstruct it. In order to do that, we have to rip out and destroy the predication.

For the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic, the predication is comprised of the fact sets underpinning the need for a declaration of a national emergency. As noted, the declaration is rooted in and affected by legislation. Extracted from our April 2020 article,

Translated, the Fauci cohort technically usurped President Trump’s emergency powers when then President Trump declared a national emergency relative to COIVD-19. This compelled Trump to defer to them in the effort to steer the U.S. through its pandemic response. Therefore, in order to secure those powers back, the predication for the national emergency must be destroyed and the declaration rescinded.

With that last sentence in mind, finding a cogent explanation for how and why manipulated data became the driver for the fraudulent pandemic is easy. It also fully explains why in Spring 2020, they dragged us through the seasonal die-off of flu/pneumo with the mid-April shift from mortality data, which was in decline at the time, to “infection data,” which had never been done before – EVER. They’re doing the same now in spring 2021 with “variants” fear porn.

What is the predication for the national emergency? In short, we can say that the predication was based upon a new and apparently highly virulent virus about which there was little to no knowledge and for which there are no known treatments (cures). Obviously and by now, it’s known that both points are fabricated narrative that are patently demonstrable as lies.

Moreover, the Fauci cohort ignored natural herd immunity and set the standard for recovery as the widespread inoculation of the masses with experimental mRNA “vaccine” technology unapproved by the FDA for use outside of the “emergency” designation. This means that if the predication for the national emergency is removed relative to the pandemic, then the predication for the authorization of experimental vaccines is also removed. Without one there is not the other.

What is the predication for the emergency designation? In part, it’s that there are no known cures to the disease. Enter Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, which are both known and effective treatments for SARS-CoV-2. The latter has been safely in use all over the world for over 60 years and the Fauci and MSM cohort obliterated then President Trump for recommending it as an effective remedy; instead driving the mRNA vaccination objectives. There was a very specific reason Hydroxychloroquine (and Trump) was attacked the way it was and it’s obvious. With effective treatments immediately made available in late 2019 or early 2020, the pandemic would never have gotten out of its criminally fraudulent starting blocks.

Here’s how to press the “easy button” to undo COVID-19 and return to normal. Importantly, though, everyone must realize that in actuality, there is nothing easy about this and “easy” is only offered in colloquial terms for the sake of the conversation.

A narrow spectrum of effective treatments to COVID-19 including Ivermectin and Hydroxycholoroquine effectively remove the predication for experimental mRNA vaccinations, which were set as the standard exit from the pandemic. These effective treatments in combination with statistically accurate attributions for mortality and infection data; and remembering that only 5% of that data remains valid, return all pandemic infection and mortality rates to the range of conventional seasonal flu season. We don’t issue national emergency declarations for conventional, typical flu seasons.

The net effect of this eviscerates the entire predication for the declaration of a national emergency: 1) the infection and mortality data are otherwise standard, 2) effective treatments are widely available and, thanks to an ultimately high order maneuver by President Trump, 3) a slate of vaccination options exist. Importantly, it also creates the impetus to rescind the emergency declaration and immediately so.

For a quick sidebar, this hallmark successes completely overturned their apple cart causing them to regroup and once again, revise their plan and timeline in responsive fashion. I suspect that they intended on leveraging the conventional years-long vaccine R&D timeline to extend the construct for its original intent – a control mechanism.

Once the national emergency declaration is rescinded, the emergency authorization for the apparently dangerous and deadly experimental mRNA vaccinations also disappears. It would immediately make it impermissible to administer those vaccines because there is no authorization beyond the emergency designation. This would compel vaccine manufacturers to then align with conventional timelines for research, development, testing and delivery and that assumes they’re even needed to begin with, which they are not. Importantly, this would immediately put to rest vaccination mandates by places of work, schools, etc.

Combined with effective treatments, the rescinded national emergency declaration would also eliminate the predication for the CDC to issue pandemic guidelines and mitigations. Therefore, the authority that predicates and underpins gubernatorial enforcement of mitigations and guidelines at the state level (federalism bears down here) is removed as governors would be precluded from acting outside of the explicit language found in each respective state constitution. No emergency declaration, no emergency powers, no emergency experimental vaccines and no mitigations or guidelines or enforcement thereof. Everyone do as you please as God intended.

All of it is undone by removing the predication for the emergency declaration and the evidence validating rescinding it exists in spades.

Americans have short attention spans but timeline overlays can overcome this unfortunate dynamic for anyone willing to examine reliable information and data. If they further care to take action from that position, it would begin with ripping away the predication for all of it and beginning with the March 2020 national emergency declaration that serves as the only card holding up and entire house constructed of fraudulently fabricated cards.

Assuming President Trump returns to office in August as the evidence is now suggesting, his first order of business should be pressing the “easy button” and ripping away the predication for the single greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people and the global population.

From there, we’ll eat popcorn and enjoy the show.

-End-

Daszak Delivered Damning Details in 2016

The Moonshine catalog of work relative to COVID-19 is unmatched and in important ways, exclusive in the positions it rests on and evidences. In all of that, a particular premise that underpins the broader position is the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was bio-engineered or bio-weaponized. In the pursuit to support our postulation with verifiable evidence, we latched on to very early epidemiological findings that were indicative of genetic markers in the SARS-CoV-2 strain that demonstrated it contained artificial HIV insertions.

It is critical to understand that the artificial HIV insertions represent the precise bio-engineering needed to permit SARS-CoV-2 to transmit and become virulent as it did and that without the HIV insertions, the SARS-CoV-2 virus is incapable of performing accordingly as occurring naturally and outside of a laboratory setting. That type of bio-engineering (bio-weaponizing) is called gain of function and it’s the precise research book-ended by the U.S. and China and with Anthony Fauci, the NIH/NIAID, U.S. funding, Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance all inconveniently ensnared in between.

More recently, we revisited this epidemiological work to verify recent updates to it including the genetic evidence of a confirmed 6 artificial HIV insertions in SARS-CoV-2. With absolute confidence and in short, there is a 0% chance that SARS-CoV-2 was NOT bioweaponized because the genetic evidence, which is understood to be entirely reliable and is admissible in a court of law, is irrefutably contained within the viral strain itself. It’s a closed circle and a closed case for gain of function research relative to SARS-CoV-2.

What remains is hashing out culpability and if you’ve been drinking your Moonshine, you know that President Trump compartmentalized the culpability for the COVID-19 political construct entirely with the Fauci/Pench cohort during a legendary April 2020 press conference I’ve rehashed countless times in myriad articles and videos.

For the sake of fidelity in our discussion today, a foundation of recent work should be consumed to understood what underpins our evidence and our purpose here today, which is to take in a short video featured in a Natalie Winters item at The National Pulse. That foundation includes the links contained both above and below.

In both granular detail and in a more layman approach, while also further pinning culpability specifically on the Wuhan Institute of Virology, I’ve recently outlined the status quo as the U.S. being situated in an irregular, asymmetrical and undeclared third world war formally commenced with the release of a Chinese bio-WMD. In two parts and falling back on a third November 2020 article that addresses the beginning of Fauci’s pivot out of COVID-19, we discussed a general general carve-out in the broader narrative for the COVID exit along with a specific carve-out being constructed for Fauci’s exit, which is expected to take the form of a controversial retirement or resignation; my money being on the former.

Additional recent work building on our foundation and adding to the dialogue includes a deep and wide look at how the energy sector was/is serving as the conduit to move money internationally and the further emergence of gain of function research enmeshing Fauci and the WIV relative to research and funding, which holds Fauci like quicksand and keeps him from escaping deserved scrutiny.

Another weighty article that should be consumed and understood and which caught the eye of Lin Wood, who reposted it on Telegram and has been sipping the Moonshine ever since details the evidenced history of Fauci, Barack Obama and then Lisa Monaco’s Department of Homeland Security as gain of function research was off-shored to China following the emergence of internal U.S. whistleblowers. This occurred on a 2015-2016 timeline and is contiguous to our broader timeline here.

Relative to our timeline, don’t forget about this email referencing a meeting in which Joe Biden participated.

Another important piece includes one that further ensnares Fauci and drags the premier U.S. bio-containment facility, or shall we say bio-weaponization facility – Ft. Dietrick (Maryland) – to the front and center taking recently emerged evidence and linking it all of the way back to the entirety of the Moonshine catalog of COVID work that began in earnest in late December of 2019 and just days after the 27 Dec 19 first report of the outbreak in Wuhan.

The rubber is about to meet the road but another article details the free fall of #FalseFlagFauci and hashes-out the recently released tranche of Fauci emails. It contains this email below and the subsequent remarks about it relative to Fauci; Peter Daszak, who is the topic of the Winters video; EcoHealth Alliance, which is Dasazk’s outfit and which served as an intermediary conduit (again, the public-private interface and as it was leveraged with U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine) to funnel money to the WIV for off-shored gain of function research. In this particular instance, the email details a collective position to advise the MSM of a fraudulent COVID-19 narrative to drive the construct.

This emails is significant for a spectrum of critical reasons:

  • Fauci and another are represented as conspiring to deliver a known fraudulent narrative via the MSM
  • This overlaps the precise mid-April 2020 shift when the CDC/WHO cohort moved the conventionally accepted pandemic measurement – mortality data – which was in decline at that time, to infection data, or “new case data” and so as to drag the pandemic through the seasonal die-off of the co-morbidities being statistically leveraged and right back to peak-flu of 2020-2021, which the CDC begins every December 1st
  • Fauci is shown crafting the narrative to comport with the forthcoming anticipated explosion of cases as constructively delivered by deliberately faulty PCR testing that the Democrats began calling for dating back to January 2020
  • It is relative to the legendary April 2020 news conference that I mention often and for which it seems most people missed the most important angle whereby President Trump dragged Fauci back to the podium and forced him to correct his own record and in so doing, Trump compartmentalized all of the COVID-19 matter entirely within the Fauci/Pence cohort (pandemic response team), which effectively usurped the President’s emergency powers with the 11 Mar 20 declaration of a national emergency.

With all of this on the table and underpinning the Winters video, let’s get to it.

In the video, which is linked in Winter’s article at The National Pulse, you’ll hear Daszak remark voluntarily and devastatingly – to his and Fauci’s case – as he describes gain of function work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology dating back to 2016 and relative to our timeline above.

From Winters,

Daszak made the admission at a 2016 forum discussing “emerging infectious diseases and the next pandemic,” which appears to be at odds with Fauci’s repeated denial of funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

While describing how his organization sequences deadly viruses, Daszak describes the process of “insert[ing] spike proteins” into viruses to see if they can “bind to human cells” as being carried out by his “colleagues in China”:

“Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we… Well I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people. 

“You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers,” he adds.

In Daszak’s own words,

Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance

https://politicalmoonshine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/fauci-funded-daszak-describes-apos-colleagues-in-china-apos-manipulating-viruses-into-apos-killers-apos-y2matez.com_.mp4

That was in 2016 and only months before the most important timeline in contemporary U.S. history. The carve-out for the COVID exit is in play. The carve-out for Fauci’s exit is in play. I branded him #FalseFlagFauci a long, long time ago and since then, the evidence has only stacked-up in our favor, to his detriment and copiously.

It’s only a matter of time.

-End-

Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine: A Closer Look at the Guide

In this article, we’re taking a closer look at the U.S. Counterinsurgency Guide 2009-2017 and with the understanding that it’s imperative to read the first article for appropriate contextual backdrop. That article recapitulates an older established position featured in an April 2020 article I wrote and then reinforces those positions with evidence from a more recent item sourced from Zero Hedge and cited to We Meant Well. That brief article itself is worthy of full consumption; especially given the granular supporting details I omitted from it to save space and time.

The article examines how a newly inaugurated and first-term President Barack Obama entered office in January 2009 and immediately began to apply and map-over the U.S. (and its people) its own counterinsurgency doctrine that was perfected overseas in decades worth of CIA operations conducted to dictate “election” outcomes in other nations.

FEDERALISM

A quick sidebar on federalism because federalism functions both as a mechanism and a network in this broader generational continuum. Look at it as layered one over the other: U.S. populace, application of federalism, elected representatives and officials in federal government.

The purveyors of fraud and treason atop the federal apparatus network down through the natural nexuses that intimately and intricately connect the federal apparatus to states, counties and localities. Therein the network of friendlies, which is accomplished by infiltrating as far and wide as possible the local levels of the network and moving upward where it manifests in mostly blue states. That network permits the natural interface for legislation and law; including the issuance of federal CDC guidelines, to flow through it and whereby decisions start with state governors. This is the essence of federalism and it was co-opted and leveraged back against us.

Federalism is precisely how the entire U.S. can be (was) overthrown – by co-opting only a handful of states. It’s why states have appeared and functioned differently and uniquely all throughout the fraudulent pandemic. It’s a full, precise and exact explanation for how you can steal an entire 2020 election by co-opting a relative handful of precincts.

The layer in between – federalism – which provided the network and the legal bridge for federal authority to bear down locally in light of acquiescing governors – was interfaced with the doctrines of U.S. counterinsurgency. Therein those counterinsurgency principals and tactics were applied to the populace through this network. The are other interfaces that will also be noted below.

Here are the maps of which states are playing ball and again, note the redundant overlaps in locations through different times and contexts.

A CLOSER LOOK

Let’s take a closer look at the actual U.S. Counterinsurgency Guide 2009-2017 by honing in on the actual document.

We’ll start begin with the author of the Preface, Eliot A. Cohen. Here’s what we know about Cohen.

We have an established common thread in Johns Hopkins University as much as there is a common time marker relative to personnel and comporting on a rough January 2009 timeline; otherwise extending to President Barack Obama’s 1st term.

Cohen threads through Condoleeza Rice, the Department of State and Harvard University, which is another redundant overlap. He entered State in 2007 and exited with George W. Bush in 2009. A long-tenured D.C. swamp inhabitant with a diverse professional background in all of the right areas, Cohen in 2019 was named Dean of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins. This comports on the COVID-19 construct timeline and rests firmly on another critical element in all of this – the public-private interface, which often take the from of NGOs, which we have discussed countless times.

More specifically and resting on the public-private interface, consider how Cohen’s appointment as noted above might be beneficial to the very same Johns Hopkins that was conducting a trial run; a litmus test; a kick of the tires; a shaking out of the bugs; for a viral pandemic scenario as occurring right before the “pandemic” and it was called Event 201. It took place in October 2019 some two months before the first MSM report of a viral outbreak in Wuhan China on 27 Dec 19.

Might Cohen serve well in a Johns Hopkins capacity; especially since he wrote the forward for the guide containing the doctrine upon which the entire Event 201 exercise rests and will ultimately function when set upon the U.S. and the rest of the world? Maybe? Asking for a friend.

The same entities – Johns Hopkins, here – and time markers keep coalescing and repeating over and over and over and over. Is it due to coincidence and circumstance or is it a reflection of the nebulous network of RICO statute violators committing the greatest fraud and treason we could have imagined? Rhetorical question; it’s the latter and all of the evidences supports it.

Is it surprising that at Johns Hopkins it’s the BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH? The same Michael Bloomberg threading right through all of this and right to rotten to the very rotten core? Starting to see how none of this can be accidental, coincidental or circumstance and that conspiracy is exactly what it isn’t?

The forward is short and revealing so it’s reproduced in full.

Here is a list of extracts from Cohen’s Preface. Ask yourself if these sound familiar with the status quo as I have already explained it and as it has manifested around you. I’ve also added relevant commentary to explain the particulars.

Remember, federalism bears down as both the network and the mechanism to make all of this happen.

  • Prolonged counterinsurgency campaigns: Perfected in the Middle East and elsewhere this doctrine was applied to leverage federalism as the mechanism for overthrow
  • Supported friendly governments facing internal subversion: Translates to engaging with local, county and state entities of a like mind
  • Best contemporary thought, historical knowledge and hard-won practice: Obama co-opted the U.S.’ best work to ensure reliability in leveraging back against us be the circumstance demand it – do or die as per the rule of law (assuming it is eventually enforced)
  • Best kind of doctrinal work: (see above)
  • Irregular warfare that is varied: Talk to people young and old and ask them to recall a time like the present and they can’t hence the effectiveness of irregular warfare including propaganda, misinformation, disinformation, asymmetrical approaches, infiltration, subversion, insurgency, counterinsurgency and more – all designed to bring about a fog devised to enshroud truth and reality
  • Intellectual framework coherent enough to provide guidance: Consider how the infiltration at the university level impacts everything right down to the local school board level and then consider other similar interfaces throughout the entirety of the “friendlies” network as described above
  • Adaptable to circumstances: Consider how a cohort of good “un-rigged” the 2016 election permitting President Trump to legitimately win and how that overarching construct resting on a generational timeline was augmented and revised to adapt to the status quo, which caused an acceleration in the COVID construct as a mechanism to deliver the election, remove Trump and return to operations now on an expedited timeline so as to recapture all that was lost over the previous four years
  • Demand on bureaucracies working together: This is what the Deep State and Democrats do best; co-opt bureaucracies to conduct fraud in execution of their corruption and crimes
  • Allies and NGOs: As noted here and often, the public-private interface is the primary portal for bad actors to bear down on citizen populations to deliver state-sponsored edicts and the non-governmental organization is often the shell entity permitting it
  • Interface of State, Defense, US Agency for International Development: This is redundant co-opting of necessary and beneficial entities within the federal apparatus and otherwise
  • Superior knowledge in the “human terrain”: Everything we’ve seen from the fraudulent pandemic construct to the propagation of its fraudulent data to the fraudulent and stolen election has been the application and execution of psychological warfare doctrine and tactics as perfected within the context of counterinsurgency
  • Using field innovations to knit together lines (to the top): This translates to the ground-up networking approach rooted in infiltration and beginning locally
  • Emphasis on policy as a mechanism: Consider that leveraging the federal bureaucracy to leverage policy means compromising policymakers and one example of many is the Swalwell/HPSCI/Chinese spy scenario
  • Remarkable field innovations: Insurance by using the best tried and true methodologies
  • PRTs bringing together civilian and military personnel: This translates to bringing together local, county and state entities with federal entities by leveraging federalism
  • Insurgency as growing security challenge: This is indicative of the weaknesses identified that were eventually positioned for exploitation towards the objective
  • Weak state structures: This translates to infiltration efforts that delivered acquiescing governors relative to COVID-19, the riots and the stolen election
  • Demographic pressures: This includes “white nationalism” and “systemic racism” campaigns and the series of riots 2020-2021
  • Environmental pressures: This includes last summer’s fires and the relentless false “climate change narrative”
  • Economic pressures: Consider all of the economic devastation delivered by COVID-19
  • Ease of cooperation between insurgent groups and criminals: This translates to the existing and emerging networks for Antifa, BLM and relevant others
  • Appearance of destructive ideologies: This includes projecting Nazism onto Trump supporters, the false “systemic racism” narrative, the false “white nationalism,” narrative, the false “white males” narrative, the false “gun violence” narrative and all of the false flag shootings that go with it and more

Cohen tells us, “This guide provides that.”

ANY OTHER VIABLE EXPLANATION?

Now look around you and consider everything I’ve tediously, ardently, meticulously and copiously outlined here and in hundreds of articles and videos and thousands of social media posts. Consider whether or not the status quo can be explained fully and accurately any other way.

It can’t. Not for my nickel and furthermore and to the contrary, I can prove it in the other direction.

The truth rests on evidence. The truth is the truth and it stands alone and the truth is that beginning in January 2009, President Obama began to apply the U.S. Counterinsurgency doctrine against the nation and its people.

It eventually led to a stolen election and the installation of a Chinese proxy in Joe Biden and here we are.

-End-

Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine and the COVID-19 Blueprint to Overthrow America

On 30 Apr 20, I authored a piece examining how a newly inaugurated and first-term President Barack Obama entered office in January 2009 and immediately began to apply and map-over the U.S. (and its people) its own intelligence doctrine and methods (counterinsurgency) that were perfected overseas in decades worth of CIA operations conducted to dictate “election” outcomes in other nations. I’m sure many (most) who saw it chalked it up to more “conspiracy theory” and dismissed it altogether thinking that COVID-19 was legitimate and despite the Moonshine effort demonstrating it as entirely fraudulent. Therein, things like the CIA, Director John O. Brennan, Hammer and Scorecard, and Art Project and Architecture all bear down and draw us close to things like Obama, China, the CCP, the PLA, the Bidens, Dominion, Smartmatic, the stolen 2020 U.S. election, Bill Barr, Christopher Wray, U.S. lawmakers, U.S. officials, CEOs, the MSM and a bunch more.

Today, we’re going to tie it all together to continue moving forward in a broader case that we make more water-tight with each passing day. We’ll then put to rest any further notion of “conspiracy theory.”

OBAMA HITS THE GROUND RUNNING TO “FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE” AMERICA

Upon entering office in January 2009 and in addition to the application of U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine to America and its people, what else did Obama do immediately as a “first” and relative to the underlying broader political continuum; to the two-term administration he was being installed to run; and to the “fundamental” changes (overthrow) he promised to usher-in as a set stage for the final act, which would have eliminated the Constitution and the Republic in favor of a Marxism, socialism and communism in Hillary Clinton.

Again, it’s not by coincidence, accident or circumstance that the U.S. biosecurity rules rewrite began under Bill Clinton, bore down will full might during the 9/11 aftermath, were handed-off to Obama in a GW Bush executive order and were devised to come to full force under Hillary Clinton beginning in January 2017; if not for the election being “un-rigged” for a legitimate Trump victory – the first and actual legitimate electoral victory in decades. I believe it to be the late John McCain who quipped that it would be foolish to allow Americans to select their own leaders.

As one example, Obama made the eventual Chinese proxy and Vice President Joe Biden his first and “most important” cabinet appointment. For another, Obama also began an immediate rewrite of biosecurity rules in all U.S. national biocontainment facilities that was permitted by an executive order executed by outgoing George W. Bush just eleven days before his exit from office. Importantly, this permits the overarching construct to transit presidential administrations, which is a mechanism to provide cover and compartmentalize culpability while also making the crimes harder to identify and more difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Also take note of the evidenced congressional treason entrenched throughout all of this and do so understanding that the spine to the overarching and generational political continuum is the intelligence community. That manifests heavily with the the HPSCI and SSCI and the cast of characters (the ususal suspects) who occupy those committees or who have ex officio status membership to them.

As an example of the latter, the intelligence community was privy to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in October 2019 and had evidence that the U.S. was smuggling strains of the virus to China via Harvard University professor Charles Lieber. This was all provided in an FBI tactical intelligence report. Nancy Pelosi is an ex officio member of the HPSCI and was therefore privy to this intelligence. You can say the same for Mitch McConnell and the SSCI. What was Pelosi doing at the time? She was driving the first of two fraudulent impeachment constructs with the objective of transmitting the Articles of Impeachment before Christmas (25 Dec); getting it done by the 18th and whereby the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was first reported in the MSM two days after Christmas on 27 Dec 19.

Therefore, the entire time she cracked the impeachment whip, Pelosi was aware of the viral outbreak. No one else but Moonshine has told you that the primary purpose of the first impeachment construct served to deflect from and usher-in COVID-19 and we told you that over a year ago on 25 Mar 20.

The timing of Pelosi’s tenure as Speaker is important – think of all of the committees we have discussed along with the investigative and subpoena power possessed and leveraged by each. Pelosi is most certainly compromised – maybe even in writing – and most certainly by China and therefore she, like Biden, functions as a proxy in the sense that if House leadership is compromised, said compromise extends to everything under control of leadership. If abused, the House committees become the teeth in the dog.

Pelosi’s deliberate placement as Speaker on each end of the rope – both Obama’s and Biden’s entry into office – serves to ensure proper handling of House authority for the Deep State. There is little doubt that Republicans John Boehner and Paul Ryan, respectively, fulfilled their obligations in bridging the gap back to Pelosi (for Biden) and the status quo. One does not get to be Speaker unless it is guaranteed with fidelity that one will serve as required. Think fealty for all of them.

At this same general time, President Obama also dispatched his Vice President Joe Biden to travel the globe brokering one private equite energy deal after another; the same can be said for Biden’s initiative to strike new relations with a host of nations in the areas of energy and natural gas. It’s imperative to understand that in this light, I’ve established a working and evidenced position that the global energy sector is/was being used as a primary conduit to move money in private equity deals and many of the locations overlap vaccine research in other nations and that overlaps the Bidens specifically.

Everything we discuss today should also be consumed relative to the established Moonshine position on the status quo and in short, it’s that the U.S. finds itself situated in an irregular, undeclared and asymmetrical third world war that was formally commenced in October 2019 when China released a bio-WMD on the U.S. and the rest of the world; and from that, leverages an installed Chinese proxy in Joe Biden and his administration.

The evidence on Hunter Biden’s laptop suggests that China’s viral construct was called “Art Project,” it was complimented by Architecture and that both derive from China’s One Belt One Road doctrine, which leverages energy and infrastructure as the interfaces to apply Chinese doctrine to globally affect change and broker financial deals. The looming U.S. infrastructure bears down here on the former.

EVIDENCE OF THE APPLICATION OF U.S. COUNTERINSURGENCY DOCTRINE

Holding our attention and serving as the context for our discussion is a brief article featured at Zero Hedge and sourced at WeMeantWell.com and from it, we’ll pull extracts to provide associated the tiebacks. Underpinning our conversation and as noted above is my original article, which frames the application of U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine relative to Saul Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’, Obama’s oratory prowess as an effective tool to foment “fundamental change” and, something no one else has contextually established the way we have – that federalism (separation state/county/local and federal authority) serves as the primary mechanism to divide the nation and its people one state, one county and one city at a time; just like the CIA did for decades in the Middle East. If you’ve been drinking your Moonshine, you’ve been far ahead in the information game by well over a year.

Importantly, that article also described how America is supremely ripe for overthrow and that the mechanism to facilitate it was infiltration from within; hearkening back to then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s words of warning to state governors and universities last summer when he essentially placed them all on notice relative to Chinese influence and infiltration.

America being ripe can’t be overlooked because it speaks directly to six things: 1) the effectiveness of hostile foreign nations (primarily China) in infiltrating the U.S. and its institutions on a generational timeline, 2) how that aligns with Chinese war doctrine, 3) the effectiveness of the propaganda those hostile nations (China) were able to sow into the MSM narrative for public consumption, 4) the effectiveness of the (Chinese) propaganda to move a large swath of the populace away from traditional American principles so as to effectively divide the country by leveraging “systemic racism“, 5) the effectiveness of the propaganda leveraging reliable Nazi era constructs, and 6) the ineffectiveness of the feeble American mind to prevent all of this from happening (here, the U.S. public education system bears down with full might.)

All Obama had to do was skillfully weave his oratory web to convince Americans that the greatest Republic on earth required “fundamental change” and that he did. To facilitate it, he applied our own counterinsurgency against us.

What follows are the relevant extracts from the short article that should be consumed in full.

We’re talking about the CIA – the most formidable intelligence agency in existence and one that is prohibited by law from operating domestically against American citizens. Now ask yourself if such an outfit would shoot blindly from the hip in controverting something as legally and constitutionally substantial as operating against Americans in America? Not in a million years would they do that. Rather, the CIA would rely on a trusted and vetted system of proprietary knowledge that has been field tested for efficacy in other nations and specifically devised to deliver the operational objective here, which is regime change. The U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine from 2009 that is our primary focus in this is a perfect example of what I just described.

Dating back a year to last I began to refer to Devin Nunes’ “Horrible Hundred,” which was in reference to the over 100 MSM reporters he indicated were under sealed indictment. Look back over the past several years and ask yourself if the above description is accurate relative to the MSM up to today? What is Operation Mockingbird? It certainly bears down here.

How many times have MSM reporters gotten it wrong when they were so adamant they had it right and never really with any formal and appropriate correction of the record: Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, insurrection, impeachment 2.0, the stolen 2020 election, the Biden presidency, and more.?

Is that a result of all of those reporters merely getting all of that wrong consistently and collectively over time or is it such that those reporters are functionaries of the CIA either directly or indirectly and wittingly or unwittingly? I do this work (as a former fraud investigator) for fun; as a hobby. I don’t make a penny from it and I work alone (acknowledging others in my backdrop.) So, why is it that all of my established, sourced, cited and evidenced findings exist in a different universe than theirs? Rhetorical question.

Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and common sense – regardless of party affiliation – who still believes the MSM writ large only does so because it tickles them right where it matters most and because they’re too intellectually undeveloped to challenge their own conventions; hence the aforementioned feeble American mind.

As painfully as it is to state this, there has never been a more perfect and timely moment than now to actually listen to Nancy Pelosi speak. Here Pelosi galvanizes the prior points and the point above while she marries it all to the MSM.

The “tools of war abroad” have come home? I’m here to tell you that the primary tool that served as the blueprint for an ongoing overthrow was/is the same precise and exact U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine that was applied and which I identified.

Planted stories? Do these sound like planted stories that were hammered home by the MSM ad nauseam and using tactics like multiple sources and wrap-up smears: Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, insurrection, impeachment 2.0, the stolen 2020 election and the Biden presidency? Taking what they reported then against what you know to be true now does it appear that there was/is a cohort of the CIA, U.S. politicians, relevant corporate sectors (BIG MONEY, BIG MEDIA & BIG TECH) and the MSM that is operating domestically and to affect the U.S. populace toward a desired outcome?

Latch onto the notion of taking down a sitting president on the 2017 timeline. Now examine the timeline I’ve been compiling for several years but which remains incomplete. Simply apply some logical deduction to gain meaning from this – substantial, critical and foundational meaning.

It’s obvious the author is tying in contemporaneous examples such as the fraudulent Mueller special counsel construct and that is why the entire source article is worthy – there is an abundance of similar evidentiary examples of which I spared you most of the granular details to remain focused on counterinsurgency. Did the press; however, swallow it all or were they complicit in comply aligning with the narrative as being sown by the intelligence community that is at the foundation of everything? Rhetorical question. See the Nunes Horrible Hundred.

Take note of the overlaps that thread throughout the entire tappestry of our case: ODNI (intelligence community), HPSCI, Russia, elections, MSM, CIA, Middle East, counterinsurgency, etc. These overlaps don’t occur specifally and by accident, circumstance or coincidence. All of this is constructed and the schmatics derive from U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine.

The author’s conclusion needs no further commentary.

CONSPIRACY PUT TO REST

President Obama hit the ground running in January 2009. As he was promising to “fundamentally change” America, he also took to a complete rewrite of U.S. biosecurity rules that would leave U.S. biocontianment facilities in a regulatory fog for over a decade.

Obama would also take a fundamental step to deliver us the designed status quo. The blueprint for that design, which would leverage federalism to overthrow the U.S. federal government and remove a sitting president was existing U.S. counterinsurgency doctirne that Obama mapped-over the U.S. and effectively, its people.

What allows us to put the conspiratorial aspects of this to rest comes in two forms – the truth and all of the sourced and cited evidence in support of it.

(U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide 2009-2017 – SOURCE DOCUMENT)

-End-

Fauci’s Free Fall, Fort Dietrick Focus and Full Conspiracy to Commit Fraud

There are four ways to pick-up a rope: at one end, at the other end, somewhere in the middle or as coiled up causing one to hold multiple sections at once and with neither end in hand. With the two former, there is but one direction to go – opposite of the end being held. If holding it by a section somewhere in between, you may go in either direction or both. In the latter instance you’re holding multiple sections of the rope and with neither end is in hand and often times, not even in sight. Conducting investigations is like the last analog; especially given the nature of our subject.

[Author’s Note: Preliminary proofing is complete but this still requires revision.]

As we get into this we’re going to once again blend new work into a foundation of older, existing work to provide even more clarity to the status quo and the body of work we’ve been compiling behind the scenes since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 was first reported on 27 Dec 19, and publicly since January 2020. It may feel like you’re holding a coiled rope in your hand because it’s complex.

For proper backdrop, all of the Moonshine articles from 21 May up to this one briefly recapitulate a lot of work and positions from about 180 others. That subject matter should be understood for proper comprehension here.

This will amount to another substantial piece and our curiosity begins with a tighter focus on Ft. Dietrick (Maryland) as we began discussing it in the last article. Fort Dietrick is our focus for two primary reasons – it’s the U.S. Army’s home to biowarfare and it has a long, recent and relevant history of severe biosecurity lapses. We also acknowledge the reality that it’s a difficult to obtain much more than cursory information about a facility like this, so complete evidence becomes impossible to obtain.

Moreover and drawing back on several articles but most notably Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules, which fortunately caught the eye of Lin Wood for reposting, the entire network of U.S. bio-containment facilities, appears to have been operating under an intentional, deliberate and instituted “fog” of biosecurity ineptitude from January 2009 forward.

UNCOILING A MASSIVE ROPE

As discussed in the aforementioned article, the fog starts to roll in with James LeDuc of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, TX,

Let’s start with James LeDuc from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston; which is only about 55 or so miles from the now shuttered Chinese consulate in Houston that is known as a hotbed for Deep State/CCP activity and which was recently observed (last summer) burning documents on its rooftop. Notably, our reporting has previously covered how the UTMD was enmeshed in the COVID-19 pandemic in troubling ways.

It was LeDuc’s long-tenured relationships with the CDC, UTMB and Anthony Fauci; including being the recipient of substantial funding from Fauci, that when matched with his with his recommendation to examine the WIV using a pro-China narrative (that such a possibility is “less likely”) that is causing us to scrutinize him more closely.

LeDuc set us on this course and that work grew some legs; potentially long ones.

What really holds our attention with LeDuc is this – his advisement to upper echelon scientists in the area of biosecurity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2008 and as an overlap to Obama’s first term beginning in 2009; and emphasizing our position that Obama has been and continues to run point on all things and whereas Biden is his (and China’s/CCP’s) proxy in an otherwise shadow government (video below).

In the article, I established a position that immediately upon entering office, Barack Obama began a rewrite of U.S. biosecurity rules writ large.

Moreover, the rewrite was permitted by an executive order issued 11 days before an outgoing George W. Bush would leave office. It functionally served as a hand-off to Obama to begin the rewrite.

Remember that one aspect to concealing evidence of crimes within the practice of statecraft is to allow a construct to transit across presidential administrations. This binds those presidents in the conspiracy, which lends towards keeping it secretive, while it also compartmentalizes the culpability in disassociated chunks making it much more difficult to demonstrate and prove the construct as a crime. That’s what’s happening with here.

Also, remember this – it was 9/11 and the associated October 2001 anthrax scare that was packaged up to rationalize and justify the expansion of the U.S. biowarfare program and ultimately leading to the biosecurity rules rewrite. As I continue to delineate, 9/11 and COVID-19 are sequential significant markers on a generational political continuum that was interrupted by an “un-rigged” 2016 Trump victory.

Moving forward in this position, a late 2014 Department of Homeland Security memo co-issued by Lisa Monaco instituted a biosecurity stand down at all U.S. biosecurity labs. It served as a preemptive maneuver to envelop all necessary and ongoing gain of function and bio-weaponization work from select labs while not drawing attention to them.

Then from 2015-2016, that U.S. work was halted and off-shored to the Wuhan Institute of Virology; and whereby the Fauci cohort then funded China’s work with U.S. taxpayer dollars and provided SARS-CoV-2 samples.

In all of that, the rules rewrite was underpinned by a philosophical approach centered on cleverly compartmentalizing U.S. biosecurity within a “culture of responsibility” and the individual scientists themselves instead of an approach to actual robust biosecurity system. LeDuc’s work underpinned the philosophy, which he then shared with scientists at the WIV in 2008.

Recall that LeDuc’s UTMB, like many U.S. universities, interfaced with China relative to COVID-19 and perhaps not coincidentally. Last summer, then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo spoke directly to China’s relationships with U.S. universities as if placing them on notice. A piece from the Gateway Pundit recently included links to Chinese military scientists that builds on our preexisting work and lends to more universities momentarily. From TGP,

A number of U.S.-based or funded scientists have been directly collaborating with the PLA Military Veterinary Research Institute, all supported by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or other U.S. government departments.

They include Stanley Pearlman of the University of Iowa, Pei-Yong Shi (2021) and Vineet Menachery (October 2020) of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Linfa Wang of the Duke University-National University of Singapore, Martha Stokes of the Biological Threat Reduction Program, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (February 2021) and Scott McVey of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Iowa, Duke (Singapore) and UTMB are referenced and North Carolina and Minnesota will follow.

Latching onto a middle-of-the-rope section in the 2015-2016 time frame, we can drag-in Anthony Fauci and then backtrack that to his boss, the Director of the NIH Francis Collins, and then right to gain of function research. Oddly enough and appearing as cryptic predictive programming, a cohort of the usual suspects even took to coalescing on the last episode of the Colbert Report as if to provide us a foreboding and ominous message. It included Dr. Collins, who is regarded as one of the most powerful but least known individuals in D.C.

FalseFlagFauci is first, though.

Our position on Fauci’s culpability and the carve-out being made for his dispatching is deepened by recent developments.

A Zero Hedge item authored by Sharyl Attkisson of The Epoch Times outlines three broader positions that align with ours and provide more evidence and nexuses: 1) U.S. taxpayer money did go to gain of function research, 2) the U.S. funded China gain of function research both directly and indirectly (via the Ecohealth Alliance) and 3) the WIV received direct and indirect funding (via EcoHealth Alliance).

In that piece, we also take note of the ties to the University of North Carolina and where, “The research was conducted by numerous U.S. scientists including Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina with the lead virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology: Shi Zhengli. (See study authors below.)

We also note the flow of funding from the NIH and Fauci,

“Several millions of dollars in tax money sent from the NIH to the Wuhan lab via the New York-based nonprofit “EcoHealth Alliance.” However, research with the lab, and the lab itself, received significant additional U.S. support including: Grants directly from the NIH (and) Grants directly from Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the NIH. (See grant numbers highlighted below.)”

The piece also includes an extract relative to gain of function research and C.T. Tseng of the UTMB while that also links back to my previous work with regard to LeDuc, UTMB and the WIV,

“Assistance from the University of Texas. (See excerpt from study below.)

State Department cables from January 2018 detail assistance from the University of Texas Medical Branch, including university “researchers … helping train technicians who work” in the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab. The Texas lab is supported by Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under NIH. (See excerpt from cable below.)”

A second Zero Hedge piece authored by Zack Stieber of The Epoch Times details the controversial dollar amounts more closer,

The United States gave over $800,000 to the top-level laboratory in China from which some believe the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus escaped, according to newly released documents.

Internal emails from officials with the National Institutes of Health and an office inside the agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), show they discussed in 2020 a question from Republican members of Congress regarding how much the agencies sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The total amount sent between Fiscal Years 2014 and 2019 was $826,777, according to the officials.
The funding went to EcoHealth Alliance, which channeled money to the lab for the purpose of “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.”

“We had a modest collaboration with respectable Chinese scientists who are world experts on coronavirus and we did that through a subgrant from a larger grant to EcoHealth. The subgrant was about $600,000 over a period of five years,” Fauci told members of the House Appropriations Committee during a hearing last month.

The newly released emails show one chain involving Fauci in April 2020. In it, a top NIAID official, Dr. Emily Erbelding, informed Fauci and others that a new grant to EcoHealth was for $3.6 million. Of that, about $750,000 would go to the Wuhan lab. About $75,000 had already been sent to the lab during year 1 of the grant, she said.

The EcoHealth Alliance has become redundant in all of this for good reason. Consider this email from our article discussing the recently release tranche of Fauci emails.

Here’s the email discussion from the article,

This emails is significant for a spectrum of critical reasons: 1) Fauci and another are represented as conspiring to deliver a known fraudulent narrative via the MSM, 2) This overlaps the precise mid-April 2020 shift when the CDC/WHO cohort moved the conventionally accepted pandemic measurement – mortality data – which was in decline at that time, to infection data, or “new case data” and so as to drag the pandemic through the seasonal die-off of the co-morbidities being statistically leveraged and right back to peak-flu of 2020-2021, which the CDC begins every December 1st, 3) Fauci is shown crafting the narrative to comport with the forthcoming anticipated explosion of cases as constructively delivered by deliberately faulty PCR testing that the Democrats began calling for dating back to January 2020, and 4) It is relative to the legendary April 2020 news conference that I mention often and for which it seems most people missed the most important angle whereby President Trump dragged Fauci back to the podium and forced him to correct his own record and in so doing, Trump compartmentalized all of the COVID-19 matter entirely within the Fauci/Pence cohort (pandemic response team), which effectively usurped the President’s emergency powers with the 11 Mar 20 declaration of a national emergency.

Here we tie it together. Where does Peter Daszak work? Eco-Health Alliance.

It can even be extended further to envelop more of the usual suspects.

Dasazk’s name is obvious but look at the 11:05 entry and the name Nancy Messonnier. As John Here to Help reminds us, Messonnier is the wife of none other than Rod Rosenstein. Oh what a tangled web we weave.

We’ve long documented #FalseFlagFauci’s treason and crimes and the evidence continues to stack up in perfect alignment. With his carve-out near complete and shaping up as a fraudulently framed retirement or resignation, Dan Bongino recently reported on his show that there may be an open criminal investigation into the “lab leak” matter. This overlap is not coincidental. How long before you read a headline noting that Fauci has retained counsel (likely already lined-up and ready to go but not obviously public).

Fauci’s days are numbered and so are those of his boss. Who is Anthony Fauci’s boss?

Anthony Fauci and his NIAID fall under the auspices of National Institutes of Health and the directorship of Francis Collins, MD, PhD. Dr. Collins is a University of North Carolina alum (redundant location) and he was on The New Republic’s list of D.C.’s most powerful but least famous people.

This is Dr. Collins and note three things – 1) my established position about constructs transiting presidential administrations, 2) the fact that Collins is the only NIH director to ever transit presidential administrations and 3) that his placement comports precisely with Obama’s first term to which I’ve drawn everything back and supported with cited evidence.

Note that you’ll see a similar account of intentional asset placement when we talk below about Battelle.

Remembering that an unwritten rule to evil is that its purveyors must at least symbolically message their intentions; if not directly message them. That makes Collins’ previously noted appearance on the final episode of the Colbert Report both eerie and prognosticating.

Get a load of this noting the title of the song – “We’ll Be Back” – and the cast of characters featured (otherwise the usual suspects.)

Before you do, here is why I regard Colbert as a messaging platform (SHADOW GOVERNMENT video),

SHADOW GOVERNMENT (from Spring 2020)

Here’s the Colbert piece introduced at the beginning,

Now watch what happens with Collins and our ability to tie him back to some of the earliest work in running down a brand new outbreak with little available information to be had.

The linkage is from an article by The Defender that specifically references Wellcome Trust. The entire article is highly worthy and ties the recent tranche of Fauci emails to Wellcome Trust, Collins, Fauci, NIH, Peter Daszak, Eco-Health Alliance, NIAID, WIV, WHO, Gates, Farrar and others.

The Defender’s findings were,

What does all this mean?

-There was a conspiracy between the five authors of the Nature paper and the heads of the NIH, NIAID and Wellcome Trust to cover up the lab origin of COVID.
-There was a conspiracy involving Daszac, Fauci and others to push the natural origin theory. (See other emails in the recent drop.)
-There was a conspiracy involving Daszac to write the Lancet letter and hide its provenance, to push the natural origin theory and paint any other ideas as conspiracy theory. Collin’s blog post is another piece of this story.
-Farrar was intimately involved in both large hydroxychloroquine overdose trials, in which about 500 subjects total died.
-Farrar, Fauci and Collins withheld research funds that could have supported quality trials of the use of chloroquine drugs and ivermectin and other repurposed drugs that might have turned around the pandemic.
-Are the four individuals named here — Fauci, Daszak, Collins and Farrar —  intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?

Here it is – the Collins bit just introduced. Watch what happens with Collins when we tug on Wellcome Trust I as reported back on 08 Mar 20.

Would the billionaires – Soros and Gates as previously and firmly established – stand to gain if, say, they owned and/or controlled the patents to the only known effective treatment for COVID-19 (Remdesivir via Gilead Sciences via Unitaid via Soros) and the most promising coronavirus strain for a vaccine (Gates)? One would certainly think so; especially given the nature of the presumed executed patent-sharing strategies as previously outlined.

Here’s what has been previously established about Gates in my previous work linked above: he owns the patent to the most promising coronavirus strain for a vaccine; he controls the World Health Organization through funding via his foundation; the World Bank relies solely on the WHO’s pandemic declaration to trigger pandemic bonds that would result in the loss of huge sums of money; and he created, controls and funds the CEPI circa 2016. The same CEPI that is now rolling out its Armageddon prognostication about COVID-19. Consider this from the CEPI’s own page sourced HERE (emphasis mine.)

CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum.
CEPI has secured $760 million toward its $1billion funding target, with multi-year funding from Norway, UK, Germany, Japan, Canada, Ethiopia, Australia, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Wellcome. CEPI has also received single-year investments from the governments of Belgium. The European Commission provides substantial financial contributions to support relevant projects through its mechanisms.

Close collaboration with global partners is also crucial to the success of our work to develop vaccines against emerging infectious diseases. That’s why work with industry, regulators, and other bodies to ensure that any vaccines we develop get licensed and can reach the people who need them.
CEPI

Pulling on that string goes back to the very foundation of all the work here. It envelops the WHO, Soros, Gates, China, the World Economic Forum/Klaus Schwab, the CEPI, Gilead Sciences, pandemic bonds, the World Bank, patent-sharing deals for vaccines and treatments, and more.

The 11 Mar 20 declaration of a national emergency for the pandemic bears down with full force because it functioned to allow the Fauci cohort to usurp the President’s emergency powers and it triggered all of the pandemic bonds and existing and emerging patent-sharing deals.

What’s happened between now and that earlier work is the ability to factually bridge it together.

There is more to Colllins though, and it’s a monumental aspect to the entire construct. It us draws back on the 2015-2016 timeline when the Fauci cohort was off-shoring U.S. gain of function research to the WIV in China.

Remembering that the only reason the Fauci cohort was required to off-shore its GOF work to China was that internal U.S. whistleblowers were coming forward to report it. Otherwise I’m sure it would have continued unnoticed. With that said, look at what Collins did.

On 19 Dec 17, Collins and the NIH lifted the U.S. moratorium on GOF work citing that it was “important in helping us identify, understand, and develop strategies and effective countermeasures against rapidly evolving pathogens that pose a threat to public health.”

Translated, that’s the same philosophical type of bullshit that underpinned Obama’s rewrite of U.S. biosecurity that has resulted in a less robust U.S. biosecurity system that is rife with compromises and has produced a fog that enshrouds a wide swath of questionable occurrences and practices. That fog is functional and not coincidental.

Examine the Collins GOF decision factors into what I’ve branded the most important contemporary timeline in U.S. history. It’s from an exclusive but incomplete timeline I’ve been assembling for several years.

On that same general timeline, now consider these developments as noted in a Homeland Security News Wire bulletin circa 02 Apr 18. Note how Ft. Dietrick surfaces relative to congressional funding to narrow our focus on it below.

The Fort Detrick, Maryland-based National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) is no longer facing an immediate jeopardy. The federal omnibus spending bill,  released last Wednesday evening, provided full funding for the biohazard laboratory – funding which the original administration’s budget proposal eliminated.

The Fort Detrick, Maryland-based National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) is no longer facing an immediate jeopardy. The federal omnibus spending bill,  released last Wednesday evening, provided full funding for the biohazard laboratory – funding which the original administration’s budget proposal eliminated (see “Proposed budget cuts will weaken state, local ability to handle biological, chemical attacks,” HSNW, 5 October 2017; and “U.S. not prepared to identify perpetrators of biological attacks: Expert panel,” HSNW 10 October 2017).

The Frederick News-Post reports that “The bill fully restores funding for federal laboratories the Trump administration proposed to close, including continued operational costs of $44.3 million for the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC). The Fort Detrick facility includes two high-level laboratories that handle federal select agents and toxins, including the Ebola virus, ricin and avian influenza.”

Note that Congress is working opposite of President Trump by funding to keep open bio-containment facilities he had planned to close. Means, motive and opportunity – all can be demonstrated here relative to those in Congress who have exposure to severe liability. Their opposition is not by accident (HPSCI and SSCI bear down hard.)

Let’s sidebar on Ft. Dietrick and tie it right back to the Fauci/Collins cohort to go forward.

THE ENTANGLEMENT OF CDC AND FT. DIETRICK

The backdrop to Ft. Dietrick is mysterious, complex and involves some notable lapses in biosecurity as occurring at convenient times relative to our positions.

From a Military.com article,

The inspection findings also found that USAMRIID did not have a complete, accurate inventory of its select agents. That has been resolved, Cox said.

The Laboratory Response Network is made up of three laboratories — one operated by the Navy, USAMRIID and the CDC. The three are responsible for determining unknown material.

While operations were shut down at USAMRIID, the Army laboratory still did some work. But if it identified something that fell under the Federal Select Agent Program, it either stored the material in the freezer, as it was with the rest of the biological select agents or toxins it has, or sent it to one of the other laboratories, Cox said.

While under the partial suspension, the CDC will approve the studies USAMRIID scientists wish to do, Cox said. USAMRIID leadership will have to send an outline of proposed research, including what agent it will involve, among other details. CDC personnel will then review the plan and interview the scientists to make sure they are trained and can do the research, he said.
There is no concern about intellectual property under the CDC approval model, he said. And he did not think it would affect grants. During the shut down, USAMRIID scientists were able to continue writing grants, among other duties, like consulting or education, he said.

“USAMRIID did not have a complete, accurate inventory of its select agents” equates to not being able to determine whether BSATs were missing; stolen or otherwise.

“There is no concern about intellectual property under the CDC approval model…he did not think it would affect grants…During the shut down, USAMRIID scientists continue(d) writing grants…consulting or education” equates to an interface where the CDC cohort (Collins, Fauci, et al.) can access Department of Defense proprietary knowledge. And what do the Fauci, Collins, LeDuc et al. do? They share proprietary knowledge, consult, advise and fund China on these exact matters.

It appears that in the fog, they created a portal to access (steal?) DoD secrets and give them to China.

Also note some important timeline markers. The sourced article detailing the Ft. Dietrick reopening is dated 24 Nov 19 placing it 1) after the actual breakout in China in October 2019, 2) after the revised original outbreak date of 17 Nov 19 and 3) before the original outbreak date of 27 Dec 19. Clear as mud but nonetheless important.

Within Ft. Dietrick there is an entity called Battelle, which was ushered-in via the inception of the Department of Homeland Security, which came about with 9/11. This is Battelle,

Battelle, is a functionary of the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) vis-a-vis the same Department of Homeland Security that issued the Monaco memo for a national security stand down at U.S. bio-containment facilities in late 2014. That served as the pretext to off-shore U.S. gain of function research to the WIV in China.

Realize that Batelle is FEDERALLY FUNDED and regulated; but it’s not a federal entity and that’s critical. It means Battelle like a private entity akin to the Federal Reserve.

What this looks like to a fraud investigator is the compartmentalization of culpability outside of the federal apparatus ergo outside of peering eyes within it, like the OIG.

Here’s what Battelle does. A federal entity – the NBACC – outsourced the management of its proprietary research that developed the science critical to defend the United States against bioterrorism.

It outsourced it to Batelle National Biodefense Institute (BNBI) as a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC). FFRDCs are public-private partnerships which conduct research for the United States Government. They are administered in accordance with U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48, Part 35, Section 35.017 by universities and corporations.

How many times has this continuum featured the merger of public and private entities? Again, these people do things in specific ways.

The NBACC was the first laboratory built for DHS to understand the scientific basis of the risk posed by biological threats and to attribute their use in “bioterror” and “biocrime” events. And it’s managed by a public-private entity.

Now watch what happens with Battelle.

Thinking back to the outbreak of COVID-19 and going back to some of our earliest research, do you remember something called “Event 201?”

It was a joint effort on 18 Oct 19, just a couple of months before the 27 Dec 19 first report of COVID-19, and it merged Johns Hopkins with Bill Gates, the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum/Klaus Schwab to game a pandemic crisis as a practice event.

In other words, it was pre-game warm-up. Practice. A trial run. Working the kinks out of planned systems. Whatever you want to call it.

Now look at this 11 Dec 18 article entitled “Battelle Selects New Director For National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center,” and think back to the congressional funding occurring at around the same time counter to Trumps intentions.

“The Battelle National Biodefense Institute (BNBI) has selected Dr. George W. Korch, Jr. as the new lab director for the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC).

We did an extensive national search and I’m confident we found the best leader for the NBACC mission. Not only does he bring the experience of managing a nationally recognized biodefense lab and directing biosecurity programs, he has unparalleled scientific credentials as evidenced by his faculty affiliation with Johns Hopkins University.”

Returning to Fort Detrick will be a homecoming for Korch who served as the Commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID).  He was also instrumental in the creation of NBACC in the wake of the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003.

“I’m thrilled to be returning to Fort Detrick and taking on the leadership of NBACC,” Korch said.  “The NBACC’s twin missions of threat characterization and bioforensics are essential and critical for our nation’s long-term biosecurity and for the continuous, real-time needs of federal law enforcement.”

Battelle draws right back to Johns Hopkins.

As aligned to our position(s), wouldn’t it make sense for the Gates/Johns Hopkins/World Economic Forum/Schwab/Fauci/Collins cohort to have its own pre-placed asset inside Battelle to facilitate the public and private linkage that this cartel exploits to conduct illegal business? These people operate in specific ways.

We can make these types of connections all day long and forever (actually, I have.) They’re everywhere and it appears Fauci and Collins may have a prized Johns Hopkins asset in place to manage the nation’s biosecurity developments for DHS and the Congress that fully funded all of it; and in spite of President Trump’s plans to shutter some of those facilities.

At what point do all of the overlaps, coincidences and redundancy form something greater than speculation?

From here, it only gets worse for the treasonous Fauci and Collins cohort because we now have a dead Chinese scientist who links back to very old work.

Another Zero Hedge article describes the developing update. Due to length, I debated including this full extract and did so because its content is critical and the full context is needed.

As you read it, pay attention to the complications that arise on the timeline relative to the time needed to conventionally develop a vaccine,

Zhou Yusen (is) a Chinese military scientist specializing in coronaviruses who collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “Bat Woman,” Zhengli Shi – with at least one project to geneticially manipulate coronaviruses having been funded by three grants from the National Institutes of Heath (NIH)  – home to Dr. Anthony Fauci – via US universities, according to documents obtained by The Weekend Australian (ostensibly leaked by Aussie intelligence). The previously undisclosed NIH funding of a PLA military scientist is separate from millions in grants awarded EcoHealth alliance, which also collaborated with the WIV.

The revelation shows American money was funding risky ­research on coronaviruses with People’s Liberation Army scientists – including decorated military scientist Zhou Yusen and the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “Bat Woman”, Shi Zhengli.
Now we learn that Zhou, 54, is dead – three months after filing a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine in Feb. 2020.

The revelation that the US government was funding his research with the WIV may provide a clue as to why US officials – Dr. Fauci (backed by the ‘scientific community’ after his lapdog, EcoHealth Alliance’s Peter Daszak, penned a ‘natural origin or you’re a lunatic’ letter in the Lancet) – peddled the CCP’s ‘natural origin’ theory, while any suggestion that it could have been created in and/or leaked from the very lab which received NIH dollars was strictly verboten. 

The revelation shows American money was funding risky ­research on coronaviruses with People’s Liberation Army scientists – including decorated military scientist Zhou Yusen and the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “Bat Woman”, Shi Zhengli.
National security sources said the ties between Zhou and Dr Shi ­supported claims by US intelligence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was engaged in “secret military activity.” -The Australian

Zhou died three months after filing a Feb. 24, 2020 patent application for a COVID-19 vaccine. While this could mean that he was working on a COVID-19 vaccine before the virus became public knowledge in December 2019, keep in mind that Moderna was able to design the sequence for their COVID-19 vaccine just two days after Chinese officials released its genetic sequence on Jan. 11, 2020 – filing for their first related patent in March, two months later.

Also note that Zhou had been working on coronavirus vaccines since at least 2006 in response the original SARS-CoV outbreak – authoring a study which found that “the vaccines containing the (receptor-binding domain) of SARS-CoV S protein may induce sufficient neutralising antibodies and long-term ­protective immunity against SARS-CoV challenge in the ­established mouse model.”

An expert would need approximately two months to go from genomic sequence to patent application, it implies that China withheld the genetic sequence for a month before its Jan. 11 public release. Or, Zhou may have had more of a ‘head start’ than that. 
“This is something we have never seen achieved before, raising the question of whether this work may have started much ­earlier,” said Nikolai Petrovsky from Flinders University.

Right before the pandemic, Zhou and three other scientists from the PLA-run Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology – Yuehong Chen, Lei He and Shishui Sun – partnered with two Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists – Dr Shi and Jing Chen – and eight Chinese scientists now based in the US at the University of Minnesota and the Lindsley Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Centre. Their paper, titled Molecular Mechanism for Antibody-­Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry, was submitted to the Journal of Virology on November 27, 2019, and was published on February 14, 2020.

That means either the virus was “out” for many months to a couple of years before February of 2020 (not a month or two) or the Chinese intended to release it in the fall of 2019.  In either case the evidence is now overwhelming that this was not a virus that “magically appeared” one fine day in late December having come naturally from bats and perhaps pangolins. That is not just improbable anymore — it is now, on the manifest weight of the evidence, impossible.

Remember that Covid-19 has a rather-unique site on the spike called the “furin-cleavage” area which it uses to “fold” and get into the cell; the S1 unit attaches, the cleavage area “folds” and then the second part penetrates the cell wall like a spear.  SARS and MERS both lack this structure so there was no “prior art” to use and in the first couple of months the characterizing of all of this was pretty darn new.

That long extract is devastating, it adds the University of Minnesota to our list and it provides a unique reference that I’m sure no one else will catch and it’s the “no prior art” quote.

I believe “art” to have two significant tiebacks.

First, “art” or ART refers to this, “The FDA approved more than two dozen antiretroviral drugs to treat HIV infection. They’re often broken into six groups because they work in different ways. Doctors recommend taking a combination or “cocktail” of at least two of them. This is called antiretroviral therapy, or ART.”

It’s also notable that the patent that Zhou was filing for was Gilead’s Remdesivir, which constitutes the origins of all of my written work. I simply started out wanting to know who stood to benefit from Remdesivir (on top of everything else I had already informally accumulated.)

Secondly and with ART being specific to HIV, remember that our work references evidence of genetic markers inside of the SARS-CoV-2 strain indicative of 6 artificial HIV insertions that go unexplained in nature. Importantly, it’s the capabilities of the HIV inserts, as rendered by GOF research, that allow SARS-CoV-2 to function as designed – to transmit and spread.

Now watch what happens and see where we can take this relative to ART. The origins for what follows is one of the Hunter Biden hard drives relative to the Hunter Biden laptop story.

From my 25 Oct 20 article,

Returning to the hard drive and how a friendly whistleblower is said to have subverted the Biden/DOJ effort to shield the evidence from daylight by taking the materials into custody, we learn that a second hard drive that contains information about Xi’s and Wang’s wealth information and other materials, including their asset allocations in the U.S.

“Architecture” and “Art Project” are introduced as the names for Xi and Wang’s “extremely grand plan.” “This plan is to (control) not only the 1.4 billion Chinese people” but also “the United Nations” and the “United States.”

Moreover and specifically, the plan is to also control “the U.S. President” and “any future Presidents.”

Now think very long and very hard about how I have outlined ad nauseam the precise triggers and mechanisms that have been pulled and set-off as it relates to primarily Dr. Anthony Fauci’s usurpation of the President’s emergency powers immediately upon the declaration of a national emergency on 11 Mar 20. At that precise moment, the CCP was in de facto control of the United States vis-a-vis Fauci vis-a-vis Fauci’s string pullers and handlers.

Together, Fauci and the CCP closed schools; shuttered the economy; destroyed jobs and businesses; instigated, funded and organized riots started and began a new fake race war; and they did all of it by leveraging those friendly governors in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Washington and my state of Oregon. Fauci and the CCP wrecked the U.S. and they leveraged those we trusted the most to do it.

“ALL SHALL BE UNDER CCP’S CONTROL.” I need not elaborate on that, right?

The details of it all are absurd. It was a $4.5 billion dollar deal that involved exactly what I outlined months ago – exploiting the natural gas markets in Ukraine and Kazakhstan to move money.

On the presumption that “Art Project” refers to the COVID-19 construct; and it should given the descriptive language that we could find, “Architecture” is likely to be a reference to half of China’s One Belt One Road doctrine that I’ve previously covered and more specifically, the infrastructure interface. That is how I recently tied it back to the Biden administration and the looming U.S. infrastructure bill that stands to see communist Chinese doctrine applied to the U.S.

What is the other half of One Belt One Road? Energy. Where does China’s interface with energy occur? With CEFC (CCP). With what entity did Hunter Biden broker a $1.5 billion private equity deal in energy? The CEFC.

Here is the fundamental translation to take away from this – ART PROJECT equates to the broader COVID-19 construct and it establishes ENERGY as the conduit to move all of the associated money.

This is something no one else has told you and I wrote a substantial piece on it that Lin Wood also re-posted entitled Follow the Money. It focuses narrowly on the Hunter Biden/China/CCP/PLA/CEFC [The CEFC China Energy Company] private equity deal in energy that underpins this and correlates with an exponential increase the Joe/Jill Biden’s income from 2017-2019 over 2016.

There is added value in conducting illegitimate business under the guise of legitimate private equity deals in energy and I’ve chased the Biden’s all over the globe looking at them. Most importantly, it’s the added value provided by Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives and its Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Consider this and ask yourself it it lends toward corruption in the energy sector as I’ve asserted?

From the House Committee on Eneregy and Commerce Committee website,

THE END OF THE ROPE

We uncoiled a rope and looked at several critical segments of it including the Fauci emails; the carve-out for Fauci’s fall, how and why that’s happening; the entanglements of Ft. Dietrick; the continued leveraging of universities and public-private entities; the bio-security rules rewrite under Obama and the DHS implications relative to off-shoring GOF research; sponsorship and funding of GOF research; tie-backs to foundational work into the systems that serving the COVID-19 construct; how U.S. biosecurity management was outsourced; how Congress acted counter to Trump and funded facilities set to be shuttered; and more.

More importantly and in all of that, we provide the granular details and evidence to cohesively make it function as a fulsome working explanation of the greatest fraud ever committed against humanity.

Most importantly is that all of it rests on evidence that draws down on China and the administrations of George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

We’ll be back soon to continue building our positions, making our case and in ways no one else has, and explaining what is actually being done to us.

-End-

Obama’s Third Term

Much of my work dating back to the spring and summer of 2020 featured some of the most intentionally aggravating, visceral, toxic and divisive language applicable to the U.S. geopolitical landscape. Words like sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT litter my articles, appear in their headlines and draw-down on the nation’s first black president, who served for two terms, in Barack Obama. That said, we all know who his vice president was.

THE WORK & THE WORDS

Building a case against Obama and characterizing him and those under the Obama umbrella with words like sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT was done divorced from my own visceral dislike of Obama rather, the case was and is being made entirely on the bulk of the evidence as delivered by research, findings and analysis.

The scathing and severely inflammatory rhetoric driving the reporting all occurred well beyond the point that I could factually demonstrate that the COVID-19 pandemic was “fake” and leveraged a real and bio-weaponized virus to drive a false flag political construct by propagating fraudulent infection and mortality data harvested from an average of 4.0 co-morbidities. The work was exclusive in many ways and without question, as controversial and conspiratorial sounding as it gets.

How something sounds and how it is; however, are two different things and Americans struggle reconciling dynamics like this.

The work and positions, which I share openly and without reservation at the right times, has had significant negative consequences relative to employment, family, friends, neighbors, colleagues, relationships, etc. The word “crazy” gets used often and it queues up folks for attacks. Just ask Lin Wood.

The point in all of this is a simple one. Although the work occurred while I was still essentially cutting my teeth writing and subsequent stylistic changes are notable, the stylistic word choice wasn’t stylistic at all. Rather, it was a coincidental reflection of the evidence.

Evidence and evidence alone delivered sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT relative to Obama and relative to his ilk.

Given the accuracy of these terms, it’s tragically unfortunate that many Americans still consider such accusations to be entirely antithetical to personal conventions and to what they perceive to be Americanism. What this cohort of Americans – and it’s a large one – fails to realize; however, is that in order to be a true American, one must thoroughly, independently and accurately exercise ones onus of civic duty and this requires vetting reporting and leveraging reliable sources to arrive at the truth.

That last bit is where Americans tend to fail miserably. This is also where drinking your Moonshine can be beneficial in lieu of swilling the Deep State’s elixir and chasing it with the MSM’s Kool-Aid.

So, terms like sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT all apply with full force due to evidence; not opinion or stylistic choices.

OBAMA TOLD US SO

As if it’s an aspect of the unwritten rules framing the game of Deep State revolutions, treason and world wars, it seems the players are occasionally required to tip their hand and with this collective cohort of snarky smart-asses deserving of a fist full of knuckles and the subsequent spitting of teeth, they embrace symbolism, coded messages and even direct messages shrouded with something like projection, humor, sarcasm, etc.

Don’t miss the boat or be fooled. Although these miscreants may appear otherwise, but what they’re often telling you is exactly what they will be, are and have been doing.

Do you remember what Obama said at his farewell speech? He said the Constitution was just a piece of parchment. He said that he wasn’t going anywhere. He said that he would be right there with us for all of his remaining days.

Obama was the first U.S. president to assume this type of post-presidency position and to not seclude into private life to customarily and quietly live-out his remaining days.

Was there a reason for that? Yes. Obama wasn’t done serving as president or, in other words, ruling over you, me and everyone else.

What did Obama tell Stephen Colbert during his interview in late 2020?

He said he wished that he had a frontman (we call that a proxy.) He said he wished he could rule from his basement and away from the limelight as someone with an earpiece could do his bidding. We call that a SHADOW GOVERNMENT and it equates to OBAMA’S THIRD TERM.

This is NOT a video to skip over to keep reading.

SHADOW GOVERNMENT (from Spring 2020)

That video is a perfect exemplar of where the United States finds itself and this should terrify anyone with a modicum of common sense. How do we know this? Because Obama told us so.

OBAMA’S THIRD TERM began taking shape immediately after Hillary Clinton’s unexpected (un-rigged) 2016 loss and as I’ve demonstrated, documented and explained copiously and repetitively; it generally followed a rough course of Flynnn, Russia, Mueller, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, a fraudulent insurrection, impeachment 2.0 and then Biden’s inauguration, which was anomalously early by about 13 minutes. Characterizing this, we could term it a series of political constructs resting on a single political continuum.

The coronation event marking the successful removal of a U.S. president and the overthrow of the U.S. government was Biden’s inauguration (installation) as an China/Obama proxy. That contention envelops the notion that by design, Biden is only a placeholder and temporary while the actual objective of the construct is to seat a failed but preferred presidential candidate in Obama foot soldier Kamala Harris. In fact, I have repeatedly warned that all of this is an effort to bring a failed candidate (and foot solider in Harris) through the back door.

Something I have repeatedly gotten wrong on the occasions I have tried it is predictive timing and truthfully, it’s why I try to refrain from it. As the resident genius existing in the backdrop of the Moonshine effort always reminds us, “predicting the future is fucking hard.”

Don’t get me wrong. I’ll predict an event as going to occur when evidence indicates that it is the most logical and likely outcome. Last summer’s riots were predicted in precisely this fashion and by about 3 weeks. What I did not do; however, is attach a date to it.

Predictions and predictive timing are related but different. Establishing predictive dates is fool’s gold and normally doesn’t end well but foreseeing something before it happens is how we make Moonshine.

For my nickel, the bookend date on this treasonous continuum was a hard-one it was inauguration day. Understand that this isn’t predictive timing with a date assignment but rather a position related to constitutional authority and who possesses it.

An easy way to say it would be this – if the election and the presidency can’t be protected while the president is in power, how can it be once he’s out of power? Who in their right mind believes that after being duped in 2016 that the Deep State/Democrats would ever misstep again to forego their power and authority and allow someone other than their own proxy to occupy the Oval Office? No one, that’s who.

My positions never included President Trump ceding power to this treasonous and criminal international cabal on inauguration day and logical deduction was the hitch in my get along. I just couldn’t make it work. Yes, I understood the strategic angles, which I contemplated deeply and for a long time, but I couldn’t make it work logically whereby President Trump would cede his Title II authority; ergo his role as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer and Commander in Chief, and still be positioned to effectively save the Republic.

So, inauguration day was a firm stop for me, I got it wrong and here we are. I’m glad we’re here.

Aside from missing on the timing, though, the rest is precisely and deadly accurate analysis.

More recently, what did Obama tell us?

In a piece from The Gateway Pundit, Obama said this (emphasis mine),

I think that what we’re seeing now, is Joe and the administration are essentially finishing the job,” he said in an interview with New York Times columnist Ezra Klein. “And I think it’ll be an interesting test. Ninety percent of the folks who were there in my administration, they are continuing and building on the policies we talked about…”

Obama expressed his frustration that former President Donald Trump’s administration interrupted his ability to get credit for the strength of the economy.

“That clouds what I think would have been a more impactful shift in political views towards Democrats as a result of my presidency,” he said.

Barack Obama

When Obama entered office in January of 2009 he promised to fundamentally change America. In order to do so, he was placed into this generational political continuum as the set-up man for the closer, Hillary Clinton.

When forces of good interceded on the 2016 election to “un-rig” it for the historic Trump victory, the underlying plan driving the continuum was converted to a responsive contingency plan and you know the rest of the story, which I have and continue to outline ad nauseam: Flynnn, Russia, Mueller, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, a fraudulent insurrection, impeachment 2.0 and then Biden’s inauguration, which was anomalously early by about 13 minutes.

What remains is whether or not President Trump and the military cohort responsible for “un-rigging” the 2016 election are still operational relative to 2020.

In the fallout of the fraudulent insurrection and the illegitimate inauguration, I left that door slightly ajar. Our work from yesterday widens it even more so yes, there is now a building tide of momentum that President Trump will return to office by August. Now, it seems, there is light shining through that more widely open door.

Upon entering office, he told us that he was going to fundamentally change America and 134 days into OBAMA’S THIRD TERM, he’s continues to work in closing in on the objective.

I suppose the only thing that stands in the way of this coming to fruition is President Trump’s SECOND TERM. Tick-tock, tick tock.

-End-

Two More Coffin Nails and 100% Certainty of COVID-19 Fraud – Can Anyone Prove It Isn’t?

Care to understand how COVID-19 is a false flag political construct that was intentionally developed as a bio-WMD to facilitate the overthrow of the U.S.? Then this article is for you and it includes an abundance of links and other resources to verify positions and provide you with all of the evidence you need for a deeper and clearer understanding of what is being done to us. That’s right – done to us.

On a date conveniently saddled between Christmas and New Year’s Eve 2019, when the majority of the Western world was occupied and distracted with both holiday recovery and preparation, the world fundamentally changed on 27 Dec 19 when the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak (not yet a “pandemic”) was first announced in the mainstream media news. They eased it in and perhaps many missed it.

GETTING TO THE PRESENT DAY

Curiously and by means of evidence later provided to me by an epidemiologist, we confirmed that the U.S. and other Western nations were ordering “COVID”-specific test kits and supplies by a name that technically wouldn’t exist until 11 Feb 20, when the WHO/CDC cohort would officially apply the “COVID-19” moniker to it. Moreover, the evidence demonstrates that the U.S. and those other nations were making such “COVID-19” purchases dating back to 2017 and in each and every year up to 2019. How does that happen outside of a planned event? It doesn’t – period.

I caught the breaking China viral outbreak story in real time and immediately became suspicious of it so I began paying attention and collecting evidence and data points as best I could. Those instincts were on-point and with deadly precision because the first infection and mortality data that arrived in February-March 2020 initially verified that position and placed us on an investigative track that’s still ongoing today; and like a fine wine, the complete body of work only improves as time passes; and in many critical ways not identified by anyone else. That was a year and a half and hundreds of articles and videos ago.

A day before the story broke back on 26 Dec 19 and moving forward in that general time; and in review of my pre-COVID-19 work, the focus then was diversified on topics like President Trump’s fraudulent impeachment (the first) over a completely legitimate and appropriate diplomatic phone call to Ukraine and tying that directly to the 2020 election timeline; Joe Biden and the Biden crime family’s energy corruption in Ukraine; developments, crime and corruption within the FBI; continued research into Q for vetting and establishing veracity; detailing efforts in institutional preservation relative to self-preservation (corrupt politicians); FISA abuse and especially against Lt. General Michael Flynn and President Trump; the 2015 cybersecurity bill relative to impeachment; the 2020 election; John Brennan; developments in Iran; the 25th Amendment; the coup d’etat in general; and more.

In the backdrop of most of what I’ve written and shared publicly, there has been a years-long private conversation with a cohort of informed, intelligent and fiercely patriotic people; one of whom provides me unique access to three particular sources I often cite without naming. In that dialogue, I began detailing my suspicions over the outbreak and even some of those individuals thought I was off the mark, but I continued to make my case over time. I didn’t; however, have anything beyond anecdotal and circumstantial evidence as supported by rational and logical thought and deduction that would permit me to publish and present cogent thoughts on COVID-19 being a false flag political construct and do so without looking mostly insane, which some friends and relatives already think anyways. So I withheld those thoughts until something would arrive into which I could sink my teeth.

It would end-up being the first data sets for infection and mortality that arrived in February-March 2020 that did it. My position on the “fake pandemic” was partly verified by what I found inside those data sets and now, I had to continue working to prove it, which constituted a long path forward.

The simple concept of inverse proportions on a single timeline and with hockey stick relationships (a hallmark indicator of fraud) made for some straight forward parsing out of data to confirm positions.

Notably and dating back to mid-December (pre-COVID), I was focused on this curious need for Adam Schiff (HPSCI) and Nancy Pelosi (Speaker) to ensure that President Trump were impeached before Christmas. Why? Who enforces a due date – like it’s some sort of overdue library book – rather than giving full fidelity to conducting a thorough, proper, fulsome and accurate investigation to provide full and accurate summary findings for public consumption?

No one. That’s who. No one who has a modicum of appreciation for the gravity of a presidential impeachment or fidelity for the work therein and sure as hell not Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff or Jerry Nadler (House Judiciary Committee.)

It would lead to one of the most substantial and exclusive findings that everybody else missed but I nailed down precisely – that the first impeachment was devised primarily as a deflection mechanism to usher-in COVID-19 while distracting the world from it. The COVID and impeachment timelines braided together like a rope in light of actions coming from the WHO/CDC cohort.

Everybody missed this. I didn’t and its fundamental importance can’t be overstated. What delivered it was a method of applying timeline overlays in search of overlaps. This timeline work is absolutely essential and it delivered throughout the investigation.

As impeachment dominated the news cycle, I continued to work on COVID in the backdrop; privately sharing thoughts and collecting what evidence I could. The MSM was essentially easing us along and letting the COVID pot come to a simmer on the back burner right up until the impeachment verdict was reached. Following the announced Senate trial acquittal, the COVID narrative was kicked into overdrive and that pot started towards a boil.

As best I can tell my first COVID post on social media was on or around 02 Feb 20 but really, I think I was chiming in on it as soon as days after the first news of it. I’m uncertain because my primary social media account – Twitter – is now deleted due to my banishment and I’ve not accessed the archive file.

On 05 Feb 20, the Senate acquitted President Trump in his impeachment trial and our COVID pot begins to boil. On 09 Feb 20, I had acquired enough evidence to publish my first article.

By mid-March, I had a galvanized position with substantial evidence that COVID-19 was a false flag political construct and we were set to continue making that case.

From early February moving forward, I had investigated and written about virtually every angle you could conceivably identify and using open sources to do it.

By mid-April 2020 and 28 articles into it, we were locked in for the first comprehensive article entitled Cause of Death for Sale, which delineated the broader premise and included examining financial incentives in federal dollars for medical providers complying with federally issued COVID policies (Fauci/CDC); all within the outlined construct for the criminal predicate (fraud), which I later diagrammed (below) to include a lengthy report I’ve yet to make public. That report assumes the same quality, format and detail relative to what I formerly used to submit to law firms and insurance companies as a high-value fraud investigator.

That article also contains the actual slides from the 13 Jan 17 presidential transition meetings whereby an outgoing Obama administration inserted the pandemic construct into the Trump administration by means of those same compulsory transition meetings.

Presidential transition meetings are framed in longstanding legislation that Obama augmented with an executive order on 18 Mar 16 when he included “pandemic preparedness” as a topic for the meetings. Obama’s White House also coordinated the initial leak of the Flynn/Russia lie releasing it to the MSM for publication immediately prior to the transition meetings and as a deflection or distraction.

Note this redundant pattern of tactics of using one event to detract from another.

Moving forward, note two critical elements. For one and relative to both the 2020 election and his eventual refusal in January 2021 to execute his electoral duties as President of the U.S. Senate, Mike Pence was previously assigned by President Trump as the point man for COVID-19. Then, in April 2020 during a legendary press conference, President Trump dragged Anthony Fauci to the podium and required him to correct the record that Trump had accepted all of his recommendations, mitigations and guidelines the first time they were presented to him and on each and every occasion.

This is a fundamental component that, once again, seems to have escaped everyone and it’s one I’ve hammered home in this context; alongside the use of the same tactic as identified in other contexts. With these critical maneuvers, President Trump sagely and entirely compartmentalized the culpability for COVID-19 and the accompanying genocide with the Pence/Fauci cohort. Having done so will allow Trump to walk away from a modern day holocaust with no strings attached and rightfully so. Pence and Fauci own it all.

Dating back to this general time period (spring into summer) last year, much effort was spent outlining the treasonous aspects of both former President Barack Obama’s presidency and a full slate of corrupt bureaucrats, officials and politicians.

In late August 2020, I reported that on 26 Aug 20, the most significant confirmation to-date was received relative to the underlying premise underpinning the entire COVID-19 “pandemic” – that the pandemic was nothing more than the deliberate propagation of patently fraudulent infection and mortality data harvested and curated from an average of 2.6 underlying comorbidities. Therein, they stated that 94% of the data used to justify guidelines and mitigations were unreliable and that only 6% was valid. This put the number of “COVID deaths” under 10,000 and precisely in the range of seasonal flu/pneumonia; not what the MSM is and has been reporting. Fraud. Through and through – fraud.

More recently I reported that on 12 May 21, the CDC made the same revisions but exacerbated the situation by increasing the numbers. It now stands such that for all “COVID deaths,” only 5% of the data remains valid, 95% of it has been revised away and the average number of underlying co-morbidities (primarily flu, pneumonia, heart disease, diabetes and obesity) was increased to 4.0. That’s even worse fraud.

INSERT GRAPHICS / POSTS / LINKS

As it stands now, there is no chance that the positions and work are in error or, in other words and as I’ve been hollering for about a year and a half and long before anybody else, the entire pandemic is one of fraudulent data. Every bit of it; except for the real virus, the real bio-weaponization of it, the real and intentional release of it and sadly, the real Americans and others who died from it. That’s all real. Very real. As in modern day holocaust real.

Let’s pause. Some of you are calling me out saying I’m contradicting myself but that would only be in absolute terms. Yes, the virus is real and it killed people and yes it’s entirely a pandemic of fraudulent data – they’re not mutually exclusive; rather, they serve one another. Look at what that nasty little bug has delivered. But here’s the data point that the CDC can’t escape.

Moving forward from October 2020 and focusing more closely on electoral politics, of which there has been and continues to be plenty, the effort continued to focus on enmeshing the established COVID-19 fraud as a known China mechanism within a broader effort from China, the CCP and the PLA; and then establishing all of the nexuses and linkages tying it all together. Again, there was no shortage of work and it can be consumed independently.

In November, I identified a particular aspect of COVID-19 respective to the stolen election and the need for President-elect Biden to enter office with momentum established to reverse course on it. Who unleashes a bio-WMD to steal an election only to let that bio-WMD continue to wreak havoc with your own presidency? No one. That’s who. That explains why Fauci began to pivot-out of COVID in late November; after the stolen election but before Biden entered office.

Keep the above in mind as I front-load the next data point. The front-load is this – the CDC/WHO cohort was using deliberately and anomalously high cycle thresholds (35-40 v. 17-25 and as an indicator of viral load) relative to PCR testing. Now, bear in mind that the virus was never isolated relative to PCR testing and moreover, the developer of the PCR test – who is now deceased circa 2019 – how convenient? – advised that the PCR test was never intended as a diagnosis tool implying that it’s being misused and delivering unreliable data relative to COVID.

Do you know what PCR tests with faulty high cycle thresholds deliver in absolute abundance? False positive test results. FALSE POSITIVE TEST RESULTS! Remember how I framed the “pandemic” as one of propagated fraudulent data? The intentionally faulty PCR tests, as determined by the CDC/WHO cohort, became the primary data driver for the pandemic.

Remember what occurred around mid-April 2020? The CDC/WHO moved away from the historical and conventional pandemic measurement of mortality data, which was in decline at the time, to the measurement of “new case data.” That’s never been done before and it allows them to leverage the faulty high CTs in the PCR test; remembering that beginning in January 2020, the Democrats were howling about expanded testing. Now you know why.

Following the mid-April shift, the PCR tests delivered the pandemic as designed and now, everywhere we see cases of expanded testing and vaccination, we see explosions in COVID “cases.” India and Seychelles are perfect examples of this dynamic and that of vaccinated people subsequently testing positive (Seychelles.)

I asked you to keep in mind the Fauci pivot out of COVID four paragraphs up and it applies to PCR testing. This is why. Knowing what you know now about PCR tests and acceptable cycle thresholds, consider this.

Do you know what the WHO/CDC did within one hour of Biden’s oddly early 20 Jan 21 inauguration? They revised the CT for PCR tests back down to a conventional range presumably at or near 17-25. WITHIN AN HOUR!

The COVID “variant” has become the 2021 version of the 2020 shift to new cases and in both instances, these deliberate spring-time maneuvers serve as bridges to drag the “pandemic” through the annual seasonal die-off of the co-morbidities (primarily flu/pneumo) being leveraged for data and taking us right back to peak flu season, which the CDC indicates as beginning every 01 Dec and running for two months. Rinse, repeat.

People not catching onto what I was shouting over a year ago was a nightmare come true – none of us are getting our lives back until someone makes these people stop.

After taking a stab at podcasting (9 volumes) followed a brief hiatus to take a needed break, I came back with several hard-hitting articles recently; saving the best for last. In the first, I provided a complete recapitulation and explanation of the pandemic while reinforcing the notion that the country seems to be oblivious to the fact that we find ourselves in an undeclared third world war and with a Chinese proxy occupying the White House in preparation for taking a likely dive.

In an another, I built on existing work to zero back in on the longstanding position that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is the genesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; that the virus was bio-engineered and bio-weaponized; that it was released deliberately; and that Fauci and the NIH collaborated on and funded the research.

A third article delineates how China may use their Biden proxy to legislatively apply Chinese doctrine to the U.S. with the looming infrastructure bill.

The fourth one identifies a substantial shift in the broader narrative and whereby I have identified the exit plan for Biden and China whereby a carve-out is being made for China to assume responsibility for a “leak” by sowing a fraudulent narrative around internal lab sloppiness. This apparent and odd assumption of culpability by China permits the compartmentalization with China itself and that is beyond a big deal.

China is making this compartmentalization as a means of excluding the U.S. from and completely controlling the explaining narrative. It allows China to determine the exact explanation of the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and to provide all of the requisite evidence (or not) they want (after they fabricate to meet needs.) It should a surprise to no one that Biden recently ended former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s investigation into the same rather preferring to defer to the WHO, which China (and Gates and others) own and have owned by means of funding. No sooner did I hit publish than did Joe Biden announce today that he’s opening is on inquiry. Joe can’t even find his house shoes.

What are the chances that Proxy Joe and the CCP sing the same song in their summary findings?

For deeper understanding of how and why that is important (and it is and in fundamental ways), take-in the linked above-linked article because once again, China is leveraging the strategy of compartmentalization just as the U.S. used it as outlined in the next article and relative to U.S. biosecurity.

The fifth article is the most recent and it appears to be an absolute haymaker; catching the attention of others. Lin Wood, John Here to Help and I all recommend that you consume it independently and fully for it identifies and delineates something that few if any are talking about – the 2009-2016 timeline.

The 2009-2016 timeline featured an outgoing Bush handing off another executive order to an incoming Obama and for the express purpose of remaking U.S. biosecurity writ large at U.S. biocontainment facilities. It was all predicated by a Department of Defense initiative and further, it appears that Obama leveraged a potential false flag construct created by a memo co-issued by Lisa Monaco (Department of Homeland Security) in the form of a national “security stand down” at U.S. biocontainment facilities. The security stand down permitted the capture of necessary labs to prevent further exposure in an internal whistleblower scare and may have been a mechanism to off-shore dangerous and unethical GOF research to China.

In backtracking all of the documents and reports – hundreds and hundreds of pages – I identified a specific timeline along with its components and established that the beginning of this particular effort occurred during “Phase 1” in 1999 during the Clinton presidency. I then link from Clinton through every administration right up to Biden. For the record and according to my work, you can draw all of it back to at least George H.W. Bush and prior to the time he entered the CIA in the 1960s.

Who bridges the presidencies of GHW Bush, Clinton, GW Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden? Anthony Fauci. He entered the federal apparatus un-elected in 1984 during the Reagan administration. Who was VPOTUS then? GHW Bush. Full circle and closed.

In this monster article eclipsing 8,000 words, I identify how the Obama DoD initiative served to underpin a complete rules re-write for biosecurity to install a philosophical change that featured moving away from more robust biosecurity to a system that compartmentalizes biosecurity at the individual scientist and laboratory level; just like the stolen election compartmentalized voter fraud at the individual state and voter precinct level.

Are you now coming to understand how these people operate?

Importantly, it should be understood that internal U.S. whilstleblowers came forward to report U.S. gain of function research which the Obama administration halted in 2015 before they off-shored the effort to China in 2016. Again, it was the Monaco memo and the subsequent national “security stand down” that may have been the false flag mechanism to envelop and facilitate the off-shoring of U.S. gain of function work to China.

That brings us to the present and with new coffin nails en route for bad people and entities.

TWO MORE NAILS IN THE COFFINS

Perhaps pause for a moment and let all of the above sink-in to marinate because two new story lines further validate our positions and the full body of work. They also provide for two additional nails in the coffins of Fauci, China, Biden, the fraudulent COVID-19 construct and the treasonous rest of them all.

For one, we now have two widely known and highly regarded virologists who previously and similarly provided work and evidence, which we then cited and worked from, and which identified SARS-CoV-2 as bioengineered as a bio-WMD. The evidence is derived from the existence of six artificial HIV inserts, which can not in any way be accounted for as occurring in nature. This was a primary and underpinning premise to scaffold our overarching position(s) on the COVID-19 “pandemic” and this further verification of it is of great consequence.

Consider this from Zero Hedge,

British professor Angus Dalgleish – best known for creating the world’s first ‘HIV vaccine’, and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen – chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, who has published 31 peer-reviewed papers and holds several patents, wrote that while analyzing virus samples last year, the pair discovered “unique fingerprints” in the form of “six inserts” created through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

They also conclude that “SARS-Coronavirus-2 has “no credible natural ancestor” and that it is “beyond reasonable doubt” that the virus was created via “laboratory manipulation.”
END QUOTE

ZERO HEDGE

For brevity’s sake and understanding that other teams of virologists and their findings were also discussed, including this quote, “If I was trying to engineer a virus strain with a higher affinity and infective potential to humans, I would do exactly that…”, we’ll exclude the balance of the article and recommend that it be consumed in full.

It should also be noted that up until now and based upon previous research, we understood the number of artificial HIV insertions to be four (4), which they now update to six (6.)

The second story line is about fully explainable from the headline alone; also sourced at Zero Hedge – Fauci In 2012: Gain-Of-Function Research ‘Worth Risk Of Lab Accident Sparking Pandemic’.

From Zero Hedge quoting Fauci,

“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” Fauci wrote in the American Society for Microbiology in 2012, adding “Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?”

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks,” Fauci continued. “It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

ZERO HEDGE

Really, Tony?

It seems to me, rather, that based upon evidence and not Fauci’s always incorrect rhetoric, it is more likely that a pandemic would occur in U.S. and Chinese laboratories and with compromised scientists and treasonous politicians serving an evil Deep State and with Fauci running point.

The intelligence community is the spine to the overarching coup d’etat effort just as Anthony Fauci is the bridge connecting every presidency from George H.W. Bush through Joe Biden’s stolen, illegitimate and fraudulent presidency.

We began this article by asking if you cared to understand how COVID-19 is a false flag political construct that was intentionally developed as a bio-WMD to facilitate the overthrow of the U.S.?

Let’s rewrite that question and make it rhetorical for our closing – Can anyone prove that it isn’t?

-End-

That Number 17…

This is not an article about Q but rather a high-brow dig into exactly how China/CCP/PLA may interface with the Biden administration as Joe Biden – the installed Chinese proxy – serves his principals accordingly as they maneuver to apply Chinese doctrine to America and as evidenced by China’s One Belt One Road and 17+1 programs; bearing similarity to it’s Thousand Talents program that entangled corrupt coronavirus smuggling Harvard University professor, Charles Lieber.

Herein, we’ll examine communications from the Council on Foreign relations as informed by a recent Zero Hedge item relative to China/CCP and its geopolitical and economic aspirations, policies and programs. Of course, it all neatly envelops our existing COVID-19/WWIII positions and the full catalog of work while also dragging Q to front and center anyways.

And of course, the launch point for this discussion begins with the number [17] and specifically, China’s program, “17+1.”

We are beginning with Q, though, and it’s for the sake of perspective.

That number seventeen [17] – it can’t be escaped in the backdrop of the past several years and specifically in the range of 28 Oct 17 to the present. Those of you who are like me and suffer from some level of Qtardation need no further explanation.

This number curiously manages to appear symbolically and cryptically all over the place and often in the most obscure and coincidental ways.

Whether it be that “Q” is the 17th letter of the alphabet or that President Trump has never appeared to disavow or debunk Q or, for that matter, acknowledge or verify Q, which makes this all very gooey to parse out.

Even gooier is that President Trump has a track history of appearing to point at Q signage/shirts and signaling Q by tracing the letter in the air as a gesture when interacting with others. Moreover, you can also mix in the fact that the MSM is still panicking over Q and most recently in the past few days; while Q hasn’t posted since 08 Dec 20.

I’m not giving you the plentifully full list of Qincidences involving the number [17] because the magic of research is finding it on your own. If you’re unfamiliar, take a dig if for no other reason then entertainment value.

For the Qtarded, the particulars of the “17+1” program may provide a different lens through which to review and interpret [17] or at least better inform the current understanding of it. Or not.

No matter because what is presented herein stands alone and is independent from anything related Q and so positions should be consumed that way because they are weighty.

For the record, my Qtardedness is best described as having found the original Q post in virtually real time while exploring alternative research vectors on 28 Oct 17; having followed and engaged in the content intensely since then; having transitioned from firm belief in Q’s veracity to leaving the door open to it and with legitimate doubts on board (but still holding on to hope); to – most importantly – using Q as a routinely reliable source for research topics that when effectively explored, often deliver reliable evidence routinely neglected by the MSM.

So, Q functions like a topic generator for research and is used accordingly as a tool; and that stands in acknowledgement of the abundance of collateral misinformation and disinformation threading through the entire Q fabric and right alongside a litany of predictive misses.

But this isn’t about Q, it’s about [17]+1 and China and the CCP and relative to the fact that since China released a bio-WMD on the United States (world) in October 2019, we’ve been in the throes of an undeclared WWIII. All of this will support these positions.

It’s the Zero Hedge item on Lithuania’s withdrawal from the program serving as our catalyst here and they define the 17+1 program as (emphasis mine),

“The Chinese regime officially launched the platform—which was initially named the “16+1” platform—in April 2012 to intensify cooperation with 11 European Union member states and five Balkan countries. The platform was renamed “17+1” after Greece signed up for the initiative in April 2019.

“The initiative calls for participating countries to cooperate with China in many fields, including finance, health, trade, and technology. Modeled after the platform, Beijing rolled out another project in 2013, which is called the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI, also known as “One Belt, One Road), in an effort to build up trade routes linking China and other parts of the world.”

Zero Hedge

Take note of the “One Belt, One Road” tangent because it’s a critically important one that I introduced back in October 2020 in the broader context of this extract from the article The Promise of Dark Winter,

“Recall that we maintain longstanding positions that the Bidens were exploiting global energy markets and specifically in natural gas. We tracked the Bidens’ global enterprising efforts from Ukraine – my best bet for QAnon’s KEYSTONE – which I characterized like this in an older article, “Buckle-up, this goes from the US to Ukraine, Iran, Brazil, Russia, Switzerland, Argentina and back to the US….. and Joe Biden.”

“Listen again and carefully to what Hunter Biden is saying here (visit article to linked media if you care to listen.)

“For one, he’s drawing attention to “his partner,” whom he characterizes as the richest man in the world and chairman of the CEFC, a private Chinese outfit to mysteriously appear in the Global Fortune 500 beginning in 2013. Here, it’s important to reflect back on what former Biden associate Tony Bobulinski recently stated and namely that the CCP serves as China’s political arm while the CEFC serves as its capitalist arm.

“It’s President Xi Jinping’s alignment with China’s “One Belt One Road” geopolitical and infrastructure development directive, which invests in foreign nations, that leverages the CCP political arm and CEFC economic arm.

“Here is where it’s important to acknowledge the two the primary players in the CEFC – Chairman Ye Jianming, with whom Hunter Biden entered into an agreement to serve as his “personal attorney” and who he calls his “partner” in the deal outlined below; and Patrick Ho, who was, “the fucking spy chief of China,” as Hunter described him, and the individual responsible for founding the CEFC. Curiously but not surprisingly, Biden and Ye only communicate in person. There are reasons for that.”

Political Moonshie

Now consider this from the ZH article indicating the reasons for Lithuania’s withdrawal from 17+1, which not only factors in support for Taiwan in that ongoing conflict, but it indicates significant concerns about espionage the likes of which plague the Biden crime family,

“From Lithuanian citizens, Chinese intelligence may seek to obtain sensitive or classified national or NATO and EU information,” stated Lithuania’s 2019 National Threat Assessment report, according to the Estonian newspaper The Baltic Times. “Chinese intelligence-funded trips to China are used to recruit Lithuanian citizens.”

“Chinese intelligence looks for suitable targets—decision-makers, other individuals sympathizing with China and able to exert political leverage. They seek to influence such individuals by giving gifts, paying for trips to China, covering expenses of training and courses organized there,” the report stated.”

Zero Hedge

Sound familiar?

You now likely see my point with 17+1 being entangled with One Belt One Road, which functions to leverage the CCP political arm and CEFC economic arm – and it all ties directly to Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, China and the CCP.

Examining the relative objectives and parameters provides greater clarity and we turn to the Council on Foreign Relations for some details.

We’re beginning with One Belt One Road (BRI) and with the understanding that the Council On Foreign Relations should be viewed as anti-Trump and adversarial (emphasis mine),

“China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), sometimes referred to as the New Silk Road, is one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects ever conceived. Launched in 2013 by President Xi Jinping, the vast collection of development and investment initiatives would stretch from East Asia to Europe, significantly expanding China’s economic and political influence.

“Some analysts see the project as an unsettling extension of China’s rising power, and as the costs of many of the projects have skyrocketed, opposition has grown in some countries. Meanwhile, the United States shares the concern of some in Asia that the BRI could be a Trojan horse for China-led regional development and military expansion. Under President Donald J. Trump, Washington has raised alarm over Beijing’s actions, but it has struggled to offer governments in the region a more appealing economic vision.”

Council on Foreign Relations

The 17+1 program fits within the overarching BRI as a mechanism to expand BRI to Central and Eastern European countries (CEE.) From The Diplomat,

“The spotlight of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is usually on the Asian (be they Central Asian, South Asian, or Southeast Asian) or African participants. Yet the post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe form an important part of the BRI. In fact, the CEE region was among the best represented regions at the 2017 Belt and Road Forum: of the 28 heads of state or government, four were from the region (representing the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, and Serbia), while Romania sent a delegation led by the country’s deputy prime minister. This reflects the very intense development of the China-CEE cooperation under the auspices of the BRI.

“This cooperation is better known as the “16+1,” referring to the 16 CEE states with which China (the “+1”) is developing ties: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The 16+1 mechanism involves quite a heterogeneous group of countries. Of the 16 participating CEE states, 11 are EU member states (five of which are also members of the single currency eurozone), four are EU candidate countries, and one is a potential candidate state. To many observers, therefore, the multiple high-level summits, business meetings, and statements by representatives of the CEE countries and China seem to be framing a new regional context in the European continent.”

The Diplomat

Here, it’s important to factor in Russia’s own political and economic (and military) objectives which overlap and possibly conflict with China’s European ambitions relative to the fact that President Trump had normalized relations with Russia and tightened positions on China and whereby the Obama/Biden/Deep State immediately pivoted away from China and back to Russia as the current and necessary deflection point boogeyman.

Surprisingly or not and for reasons perhaps not completely understood, the CFR article indicates either as propaganda or as truth that the Russians view China’s expansion into CEE favorably in light of opportunities for its own economic expansion.

Let’s also not forget that China is leveraging these programs in part to infiltrate NATO, as outlined by the Lithuanians, and that the current drive from the Obama/Biden/Deep State is rekindling trouble (a coup under Obama/Clinton/Kerry) in Ukraine and pushing it to join NATO relative to NATO’s continued encircling of and pressure campaign on Russia (previously covered in Volume 8 of The Still.)

From the CFR article, now consider this description from UE officials and apply my positions toward China relative to COVID-19/WWIII. Then ask yourself it it sounds like things here at home.

“In the past three years, EU officials have lambasted China for allegedly undermining the European integration process by turning the CEE countries into “Trojan horses” and sowing division in the continent.”

Council on Foreign Relations

Infiltration as a means to sow division across the continent (country)? Sound familiar?

It’s the same strategy here in the U.S. and with COVID-19 as the mechanism to do so by first creating the requisite landscape permitting the theft of an election followed by the subsequent removal a sitting president so as to overturn an historic electoral victory and overthrow the government. All of that is underpinned by the Antifa/BLM/manufactured and fraudulent systemic racism narrative/violence/riots/brownshirts component.

With focus back on Russia and from the the CFR article, consider the BRI objectives in more detail (emphasis mine),

“Xi’s vision included creating a vast network of railways, energy pipelines, highways, and streamlined border crossings, both westward—through the mountainous former Soviet republics—and southward, to Pakistan, India, and the rest of Southeast Asia. Such a network would expand the international use of Chinese currency, the renminbi, and “break the bottleneck in Asian connectivity,” according to Xi. (The Asian Development Bank estimated that the region faces a yearly infrastructure financing shortfall of nearly $800 billion.) In addition to physical infrastructure, China plans to build fifty special economic zones, modeled after the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, which China launched in 1980 during its economic reforms under leader Deng Xiaoping.

“Xi subsequently announced plans for the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road at the 2013 summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in Indonesia. To accommodate expanding maritime trade traffic, China would invest in port development along the Indian Ocean, from Southeast Asia all the way to East Africa and parts of Europe.

“China’s overall ambition for the BRI is staggering. To date, more than sixty countries—accounting for two-thirds of the world’s population—have signed on to projects or indicated an interest in doing so. Analysts estimate the largest so far to be the estimated $60 billion* China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, a collection of projects connecting China to Pakistan’s Gwadar Port on the Arabian Sea. In total, China has already spent an estimated $200 billion on such efforts. Morgan Stanley has predicted China’s overall expenses over the life of the BRI could reach $1.2–1.3 trillion by 2027, though estimates on total investments vary.

China has both geopolitical and economic motivations behind the initiative. Xi has promoted a vision of a more assertive China, while slowing growth and rocky trade relations with the United States have pressured the country’s leadership to open new markets for its goods.

Experts see the BRI as one of the main planks of a bolder Chinese statecraft under Xi, alongside the Made in China 2025 economic development strategy. For Xi, the BRI serves as pushback against the much-touted U.S. “pivot to Asia,” as well as a way for China to develop new investment opportunities, cultivate export markets, and boost Chinese incomes and domestic consumption. “Under Xi, China now actively seeks to shape international norms and institutions and forcefully asserts its presence on the global stage,” writes CFR’s Elizabeth C. Economy.”

Council on Foreign Relations

So, how do we fully align all of this with our positions on COVID-19 and World War III? It all begins with the economy and geographic economic expansion where China takes a backseat only to the U.S. Or, in other words, Chinese hegemony.

By going down the contemporary redux of its Silk Road approach with BRI and 17+1, China’s economic expansion is obvious to see. What remains is identifying how those doctrines have been applied to the U.S.

The key there is understanding that as China’s proxy, Joe Biden’s job is to ensure that the application of Chinese doctrine to the U.S. is made to stick. That horse is long out of the barn as demonstrated by Biden’s presidency itself and this “infrastructure” project that is going to factor in relative to it all.

In order to assert itself in alignment with its own hegemonic and economic doctrines, China must accomplish two fundamental objectives: 1) China must be positioned to expand while 2) the U.S. must be reciprocally positioned to contract.

Do you think that the release of a bio-WMD against the U.S. to shutter it’s entire society and economy would be sufficient enough to position the U.S. to contract?

Would that be made easier with a full slate of U.S. individuals – politicians, officials and CEOs at all levels and in copious amounts and in all institutions and in all of the right places – compromised, infiltrated and positioned to assist?

The following quote from the CFR article depicts the technical interface for China and Biden to potentially collude in ways antithetical (treasonous) to the best interest of the U.S. and it hinges on two things that directly apply to America – the looming infrastructure bill and it’s favorite past time of being a substantial borrower of money.

“The Belt and Road Initiative has also stoked opposition. For some countries that take on large amounts of debt to fund infrastructure upgrades, BRI money is seen as a potential poisoned chalice. BRI projects are built using low-interest loans as opposed to aid grants.”

Council on Foreign Relations

The keyword here is “infrastructure” given the pending behemoth bill and China’s proxy Joe Biden appears to be messaging his principals accordingly as reported by the Wall Street Journal (emphasis mine),

Lurking just behind the domestic debate breaking out over President Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastructure plans is a powerful foreign force: China.

“The Biden team sees the plan—and wants the Chinese to see the plan—as a sign the U.S. intends to put itself in better position to compete with Beijing economically. Thus, infrastructure marks just the latest example of how the specter of a long competition with China is beginning to color all manner of American policy moves, in both parties.

Significant pieces of the package have been constructed with the express purpose of trying to put the U.S. on a better footing to compete with China and its own giant investments in infrastructure and key industries. The administration doesn’t want this to go unnoticed in Beijing. When President Biden unveiled the plan, he mentioned China six times, including this reference: “That’s what competition between America and China and the rest of the world is all about. It’s a basic question: Can democracies still deliver for their people?””

Wall Street Journal

That sounds very much like a cryptic message to Biden’s principals (China/CCP) indicating that we’re open for business.

Do you think it’s an accident that China’s hegemonic aspirations are rooted in “infrastructure” at the same time Biden was installed by them and whereby he immediately placed such an enormous infrastructure bill on the table?

Do you think it was an accident that Hunter Biden (and Joe Biden, who delivered him on Air Force 2, and others under the Biden umbrealla) was enveloped in the energy sector (natural gas) in Ukraine and China and other nations and that corruption and crime occurred in those instances, too; and to the tune of $1.5 billion (and certainly more) with China?

Things like “infrastructure” and “energy,” in addition to serving as interfaces for collusion, are cover constructs that serve as conduits to move money within criminal fraud; just like the Paris Climate Accord launders and moves U.S. tax money that is for designated recipients and there is a long list of other similar fraudulent constructs.

For timeline considerations here relative to COVID-19, recall that in 2014, Obama shifted his relevant foreign policy as noted by the CFR article (emphasis mine),

“The United States has shared other countries’ concerns about China’s intentions. Developing the economies of South and Central Asia is a long-standing U.S. goal that intensified after the start of the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan and President Barack Obama’s pivot to Asia. The Obama administration frequently referenced the need for the Afghan economy to move past foreign assistance, and in 2014 then-Deputy Secretary of State William Burns committed the United States to returning Central and South Asia “to its historic role as a vital hub of global commerce, ideas, and culture.””

Council on Foreign Relations

Do you know what else happened at this precise time from 2014 to 2015? Obama’s federal apparatus suddenly grew a conscience over gain of function research and off-shored it to China and then funded it through Anthony Fauci and the NIH; and all of that occurred at the national lab (CCP/PLA) in Wuhan.

What happened in 2016? Obama issued an executive order on 18 Mar 16 called Public Law 114-136 that augmented longstanding presidential transition law to include “pandemic preparedness.” Obama did this before his transition team leveraged it to insert a pandemic construct into the Trump administration during transition meetings on 13 Jan 17.

Biden, Fauci and Obama all forewarned of President Trump’s unpreparedness for a pandemic or disease outbreak before the world learned of what would become “COVID-19” (as named such on 11 Feb 20) on 27 Dec 19; two days after Christmas when the world was distracted with post-impeachment (the first) and New Year’s.

With confidence, it can be and has been demonstrated that individuals within the U.S., some with ties back to Nazi-era Germany (Bush family, et al.), conspired with China/CCP/PLA to research, fund, develop and then deploy a bio-WMD taking the form of SARS-CoV-2, which has genetic markers indicating four artificial HIV insertions and gain of function indicators, to exploit its previous deep and broad infiltration of the U.S. to remove its sitting president, overthrow its government, install a Chinese proxy (Biden) and destroy the nation from within by dividing its people with a fraudulent systemic racism campaign and by destroying its economy with a fraudulent pandemic; and all of it leverages treasonous politicians, officials and CEOs in the United States.

Summarily, what we have outlined today is the exact interface for how China may (will) begin to leverage the back end of its infiltration efforts. It is shaping up to begin with the infrastructure bill as the portal for the application of Chinese hegemonic doctrine to the U.S. and by its proxy in Joe Biden. That began with China’s One Belt One Road doctrine, building off the program named after that number, [17] and specifically, 17+1.

Paging President Trump. We desperately need your return and sooner than later.

-End-

Standing on the Truth and Staring WWIII in the Face

The hiatus is over. This is the first proper article I’ve written since the 19 Dec 20 piece “CRITICAL: The Pending Pivot Back to Russia” examining the Biden administration’s (and China’s/CCP’s) objective of deflecting the building momentum focused on them during President Trump’s remaining days in office so as to resume the prior of Russian-predicated constructs that have underpinned much of their criminality and treason.

Or, in other words, they need the old boogeyman to be the new boogeyman to cause the people to look away from the REAL boogeyman – them.

Let’s get right back into it with a simple rhetorical question that everybody refuses to answer – where did the flu go?

We know where the flu went and I’ve been delivering that data copiously since very early 2020. Kicking that long dead horse and simply stated the flu, or rather its infection and mortality data, has been curated, harvested and propagated as COVID-19.

Much has happened since the last article and much of that was put forth in 9 episodes of The Still – a first attempt at a video/podcast style of content delivery. I had the graphics for episode 10 prepped and ready before hitting a wall, tapping the brakes and taking a moratorium – just a regular guy here and all of this periodically takes a toll that sometimes requires a moratorium. It’s good to be back to old school writing.

Ever try to sit down to have a complex and interesting conversation alone with your inanimate laptop while recording it to post publicly? Let’s just say it ain’t easy and kudos to those who produce this type of video content with both regularity and high production quality (MonkeyWerx, X22 Report, Tore and several others come to mind). The amount of work in the backdrop to prepare a single episode for posting is crazy – hat tip to all of them. With the groundwork in place, perhaps we’ll visit the format again soon.

WHERE DO WE STAND?

So where do we stand? Where do Americans realistically and objectively find ourselves 121 days into the Biden/Harris administration?

The answer presents in two basic and plausible ways as best it can be interpreted, understood and applied:

1) As Commander-in-Chief, an outgoing President Trump fulfilled his sworn Constitutional onus to defend the Republic against all enemies foreign and domestic and therefore he took any and all necessary steps to effectively advise military leadership accordingly. This would include the delineation of a commenced and asymmetrical World War III begun by leveraging biowarfare by means of launching of a bio-WMD (as classified by the FBI) against the U.S. This would include the objectives of infiltrating the America’s institutions writ large for the purpose of removing a sitting president to overthrow the U.S. government. Logically this advisement occurred prior to the 2020 election and even possibly leveraged the newly minted U.S. Space Force in response. Therefore, we would find ourselves resting in a state with a divided government where the military recognizes President Trump while the Congress and Judiciary recognize President Biden. This division

-OR-

2) We are in real trouble likely facing the end of America and the beginning of Amerika.

For the sake of the dialogue, let’s further define “real trouble” as the Biden/Harris administration being installed by China and the CCP by leveraging COVID-19 as a bio-WMD and with Biden, as a placeholder, proxy and pawn, serving both them and Obama and the Deep State/Shadow Government. Thus far, Biden has functioned largely by means of an unprecedented level of executive orders despite possessing all three requisite components to pass legislation constitutionally – the Democrats posses the Executive and both chambers of Congress. It all means that the United States has been flipped right back over to this broader and long-tenured plan that is playing out as a de facto Obama third term.

Actually, if all had gone according to plan, it would be a Hillary Clinton second term and Amerika would look much different than it does today; and not for the better. Even worse, that’s given how utterly shitty and contemptible the state of Amerika is right now. All of it has led to this, which is my new favorite mantra – “Amerika is a shit hole banana republic. All of the good banana republics are laughing at us.”

But therein we see hope in the form of a bit of light peering through a slight crack in the door.

The hope is simply this and it’s really a reminder – in order for President Trump to have secured his 2016 victory, there had to have been a preexisting military-based plan of intervention to “un-rig” a rigged election so actual could authentically stand with fidelity and deliver a legitimate and historic win. This is what gives us hope so long as military leadership hasn’t fallen alongside the rest of the traitors.

It bears this question. Who “un-rigs” an election to win only to stand in the middle of the voter fraud train tracks staring down the headlight for 4 years – never even flinching, much less moving – waiting for the election theft train to plow him over; and especially when he’s known as a savvy and highly intelligent political street-fighter the likes of which our times have never seen?

“Nobody” would be my answer while reminding folks that it doesn’t sound very Trump-like, does it?

So although it’s anecdotal and circumstantial at best, we can see that the door is cracked for some light to shine through. What remains are questions about who, what, when, where and how. But with no tangible evidence suggesting an immediate reversal of course, that is all we have for now; however, that alone encapsulates the importance of the Arizona election audit in Maricopa County in what is hoped to become the first domino in a series of audits in other states.

A long-tenured and previously covered position is that Mr. Trump must exhaust all of his means of civil redress before moving on to unconventional and by default, military ones. We’re nearing if not at the end of that rope and it stands to reason that a logical threshold in all of this is the presentation to the people of clear and irrefutable evidence of the scope of election fraud as asserted by President Trump. It is here that Arizona bears down with full might and the enemies of democracy are responding as you might expect by dispatching an army of attorneys of the Lawfare ilk and similar.

What happens at the end of the Maricopa road when the public arrives to learn generally what the military is presumed to have known with granularity for months; especially when the people respond en masse as pro Trump, pro democracy, pro America and ‘pro we’re done f______g around, fix this now!’? It’s this dynamic that appears as if it could be a logical trigger or threshold on our timeline.

It’s also important to measure against our timeline and evaluate the peculiar timing of NYC’s, NY AG Letitia James’ and Manhattan DA Cy Vance’s recent advisement of a shift to criminal charges against President Trump. This should be viewed as an extension of the Flynn, Mueller, Russia, Ukraine, impeachment I and impeachment II continuum whereby the aforementioned have been tasked. As we do this and because it informs my position here, let’s examine President Trump’s reply to this development as coupled with my reply to him, which includes a typo I’ll chalk up to eyes about to turn 50.

It stands to reason that the criminal investigation will expand into the broader Trump umbrella and into the Trump family. They’ve already and recently targeted Rudy Giulani and now this? More logically sound reasoning tells us that President likely has thresholds of his own built into any possible military-based response and they most certainly apply to the Trump children and the broader family. So, I wonder if this development is one of them? I would suggest that it is ergo we may be closer than farther away to the first actionable steps at a course reversal but only time will tell.

COVID-19

Turning to COVID-19, recall that the Moonshine catalog of work contains thousands of written pages, videos, graphics, articles, reports, social media posts, etc. that date back to early January 2020 and collectively represent the first and most complete catalog of original thought and work that is publicly available and which explicitly identifies COVID-19 as a false flag political construct. Moonshine was the first to claim and demonstrate this.

Now, consider that former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has recently shifted his narrative to China and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (a legitimate CCP/military laboratory.) In reference to prior work from the catalog, this development bodes well relative to the status quo meaning that it could be pretext for Pompeo (Trump) circling back on his advisement last year to governors, congressmen, senators and universities when he said that China and the CCP had evaluated each of them as friend or foe.

I’ve long contended that the most efficient and effective way to undo COVID-19 is to rip its spine out and that spine is the predication for the emergency declaration, which occurred on 11 Mar 20 and permitted the Fauci/Biden/Obama cohort to usurp President Trump’s emergency powers when Trump was legally compelled to defer to his experts by means of the Stafford Act. By destructing the emergency declaration, which is the precise component that provides the legal authority to eclipse the U.S. Constitution, authorize experimental vaccines, implement recommended guidelines and mitigation policies, etc., there would be no legal interface for federal, state, county or local authorities to intercede on Americans’ Constitutional rights. Or, in other words, the pandemic of propagated fraudulent data would disappear immediately. The point being that destructing the predication could and should begin in China and in the Wuhan lab and this is exactly where Pompeo is going.

Compound all of that with my early 2020 reporting that Anthony Fauci was entangled in conflicts of interest on many fronts including researching coronavirus strains relative to bioweaponization, funding the same research in the U.S. and then abroad in China, exporting the U.S.’s same research to China during the Obama administration, etc. All of this – all previously reported in old work – is now beginning to move into more fulsome light as the mainstream is learning what Mooonshiners have known for a very long time.

Political Moonshine was the first and (as best I can tell, only one) to identify and explain how Nancy Pelosi leveraged the first fraudulent impeachment as a precise timeline cover mechanism for the COVID-19 false flag political construct to be ushered-in while the Western world was distracted post-Christmas by two days. This is critical because it established the first direct political nexus to allow us to gain clarity in other associated areas including a forthcoming peculiar maneuver relative to PCR testing (more on that critical aspect momentarily.) Importantly, this allows for the hypothetical prosecutorial net to be further cast around a significant number of U.S. politicians with Chinese/CCP entanglements.

The COVID-19 timeline permits us to fully understand the fraud driving the “pandemic” while we fit it into the broader geopolitical landscape. It’s worth remembering that the all of the exclusive work here mostly focuses on active steps in the constructive process while omitting (for brevity’s sake) other important information.

News of the outbreak arrived on 27 Dec 19 but was later revised backwards to 17 Nov 19 and the first U.S. case was confirmed 20 Jan 20. Despite our early January position that COVID-19 was fraudulent, our work was placed in a holding pattern until the first respective U.S. data sets arrived in early February. From that point and moving forward, I identified the inverse relationship between the onset of CV19 and the disappearance of flu/pneumo. These general details underpin the effort to establish the true nature of the pandemic – a propagation of fraudulently constructed data.

In March 2016, President Obama augmented longstanding presidential transition law to specifically include pandemic preparedness and our evidence includes purchasing spreadsheets for “COVID-19” items such as “test kits” and other related items for the years of 2017, 2018 and 2019 (featured in several articles, videos and video podcasts.) It should be understood that relative to those years, the term “COVID-19” was not created and applied to this pandemic until 11 Feb 20. It’s odd they purchased them by name before they were given said name, no?

(CLICK IMAGE TO READ ARTICLE)

On 13 Jan 17, the outgoing Obama team then inserted the pandemic construct into the incoming Trump team’s administration during their compulsory transition meetings (those slides have been available on the website for over a year.) Not coincidentally, Obama’s administration also coordinated the release of the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story into the MSM the day before to function like impeachment I to COVID-19 – as a deflection and distraction mechanism.

In foreboding fashion, Fauci, Biden and others all previously warned that the incoming Trump administration would face a “surprise outbreak,” as Fauci put it (also previously and extensively covered and documented.)

Two days after Christmas it all arrived and Fauci, the coronavirus “expert” who has gotten it all wrong and contradicted himself the entire way, stood us down sans masks and said “don’t worry” while also leaving open international travel to the source of the outbreak in China. None of that made sense until the true ulterior agenda was understood. Now, it’s all crystal clear.

From there and going forward, the Democrats then began the push for the construct by driving the narrative for expanded testing beginning in January of 2020. Expanded testing will bear down in a fundamental fashion momentarily.

On 04 March 20, the National Vital Statistics System began by issuing a series of 6 diagnostic memos that functioned as rules to medical providers and were devised and crafted to cause the providers to harvest and curate fraudulent COVID data from an average of 4.0 (now up from 2.6 as of 12 May 21) co-morbidities (primarily flu, pneumonia, heart disease, diabetes and obesity.) The fraudulent construct also included financial incentives for COVID diagnoses over others and for respirator applications.

The Democrats’ narrative for expanded testing delivered and not by accident because the CDC/WHO did two things to ensure that it would; one of which has NEVER occurred before and that was the 2020 “mid-April “shift”, as I branded it, wherein they moved the “pandemic” measuring stick from mortality data, which is the accepted conventional measurement and which was in decline due to the annual seasonal die-off of the leveraged co-morbidities, to “NEW CASE” data. THAT HAS NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE.

Stay with me – this will make sense.

The second thing the CDC/WHO did was devised to deliver the data on demand while resting on the push for exponentially more testing. Here, they broke away from conventional standards relative to the PCR test, which measures viral load (how infectious the virus is, generally) by means of cycle threshold. Conventionally and generally, the CT is set in the range of 17-25 with it being understood that anything above 25 would deliver unreliable results.

For the COVID-19 pandemic, the CT range for PCR testing was deliberately increased to and set at an unconventional and anomalously high range of approximately 35-40. PCR testing with this high of a cycle threshold has one particular consequential result – it delivers false positive test results in abundance. Now it should make sense.

So, in April, the data driver of flu/pneumo was drying up due to typical seasonal die-off and so the pre-determined move to “new case data” occurred at the flip of a switch given how the increase in testing overlays the increase in new cases as precisely delineated on our line graph. This allowed them to drag the pandemic through spring, summer and fall and right back to peak flu of 2020-2021, which the CDC runs for 2 months beginning every 01 Dec because and as simply stated, the more you look for something, the more you find it.

More recently, India and Seychelles provide exemplars into two important dynamics in this same vein: 1) India – expanded testing and vaccination always appears to lead to more cases causing us to ask, “chicken or egg?” and 2) Seychelles – individuals previously tested and vaccinated are subsequently turning up positive for COVID-19.

Reflecting back on Biden’s inauguration and to fully hammer home the position that what we are seeing is evidenced criminal fraud, do you recall what happened within the first hour of Biden’s presidency? The WHO/CDC – WITHIN AN HOUR! – reduced the cycle threshold for PCR testing back down to the conventionally accepted level. Not even 60 minutes of Biden’s presidency had passed before the change was made. What do you think the result was?

Nothing to see here – move along, now.

Remarkably (not really because I predicted this would happen exactly as it did – the graphic above is from March and article below is from the end of April), as the PCR test revisions delivered decreased infection and mortality data so as to see the installed CCPresident off to a good start, they completely flipped the script on us in the most egregious way and by claiming that the reason the flu (pneumonia) had essentially disappeared was due to the guidelines and mitigations enforced for COVID-19! That’s right. The attributed the disappearance of the flu to their own genius rather than their own criminal fraud and it happened like everything else – as predicted. Americans are dumb, though, and they’ll slurp-up that Kool-Aid elixir like they have with the rest of it.

“New cases” bridged the pandemic from 2020 to 2021 just like I have identified and previously reported that “variants” will bridge the gap from 2021 to 2022. Unless we make good on the aforementioned Trump/military plan, I stand firm on two very long tenured positions – 1) these people will never stop until they are made to stop and 2) COVID-19 isn’t going anywhere.

Currently, we are still in the thick of it and not going anywhere even though the data continues to stack-up against the narrative (false flag political construct.) On 26 Aug 20 the CDC revised away 94% of its bulk mortality data stating that COVID diagnoses with COVID being the sole cause had actually leveraged an average of 2.6 co-morbidities. This left only 6% of their mortality data as valid.

(CLICK IMAGE TO READ ARTICLE)

The CDC did the exact same thing on 12 May 21 whereby the new numbers aggravate the matter with 95% being of the sole-cause data being revised away leaving only 5% of the remaining data as valid. Even worse, the number of leveraged co-morbidities increased to 4.0.

Do you know what happens if you take the CDC’s fear porn mortality data at 5% and 6%? Let me tell you. It puts the number right smack in the middle of a typical annual flu season when the pandemic has seen flu/pneumo disappear inversely to it.

More recently, the MSM has come to identify old Moonshine work as “exclusive” and “news” and importantly, the matter of culpability was raised. This is something that I addressed in detail over a year ago at the time President Trump actually made it happen. Just like everybody else missed impeachment as the cover mechanism for COVID-19, they missed President Trump fully compartmentalizing the totality of the COVID-19 pandemic squarely with Anthony Fauci (and Mike Pence) in a legendary press conference. TGP and Rand Paul discussed this on 13 May 21 while I brought it to your attention 14 Arp 20, when it happened.

(CLICK IMAGE TO READ ARTICLE)

The entire pandemic is one of fraudulently propagated data like the data point where the CDC has 2020 as the 12th deadliest year in the past 12 years and whereby deadlier disease outbreaks than COVID existed during the same span with obvious disparity in how it was handled for Obama.

If you’re looking for positive news in terms of a reprieve if not elimination of the COVID-19 pandemic sans a change of leadership in the White House, it’s a fruitless search in a ominous scene.

So, as it stands, the source controlling the data remains in charge (Fauci/Biden/Obama cohort) and the MSM is fully engaged in the continual propagation of it so, from a federal level, there appears to be no end in sight as noted. It will be variants that drag us through to next year’s peak flu and in between, determining who your county sheriff and state governor – either by election or moving van – becomes the priority.

WORLD WAR III IS UNDER WAY

We began this piece outlining my position that we are in the midst of an asymmetrical WWIII as commenced with the release of a bio-WMD against the U.S. and moreover, I would suggest that most Americans are entirely oblivious to this point. Therein, we can’t omit the importance of the Middle East and specifically Iran, upon which Pompeo recently remarked and for which we can fall back on even more existing work. The fundamental aspect here is that Iran has functioned as proxy manufacturer of a nuclear arsenal developed for the Deep State/Shadow Government to wield against Western nations to leverage them into desired geopolitical positions.

Refocusing on China, several recent developments further bolster our positions and confirm old work as accurate. For one, we had previously verified the presence of four artificial HIV inserts in the SARS-CoV-2 virus and of gain of function properties as markers indicative of bio-weaponization and moreover, we established a complex network of people and entities eventually tying it back to the lab in Wuhan; including Fauci’s previous research and NIH funding, and as a functionary of the CCP and PLA.

New evidence continues to stack upon old. The frenzied uptick is such that now, even House Republicans are taking it up with Fauci. Don’t forget this, too – Fauci is the highest paid employee in the entire federal apparatus making $400,000 annually having entered under Reagan in 1984. Who was VPOTUS then? George H.W. Bush, who has direct ties to the Nazi party via his father Prescott Bush? Yep. One and the same.

If you care to sidebar or come back to it later, that particular Bush angle is again covered in this.

Especially given the recent remarks from the CDC, there is a part of me that wonders if a carve-out is being made in the narrative for an exit away from what appears to be a growing tide of evidence and truth that is en route; including more entanglements for Fauci that draw back to 2014 and place him in the Situation Room (think of no ability to eavesdrop) of Obama’s White House relative to gain of function.

Recently, a Chinese professor with close ties to the CCP delineated the same position that I presented back in May of 2020 – that we are in a state of an undeclared third world war.

Here’s the larger extract with the more relevant aspect highlighted outlining President Trump’s handling of an undeclared WWIII as I presented it in Making the Case for Treason on 06 May 20,

Flynn/McInerney Interview: Critical Confirmations Across the Board

Flynn First! It’s been our battle cray for a very long time and thankfully no more as it relates to its use and by that, I refer to General Flynn’s recent pardon and the understanding that he has returned to the fight in full. One the back end of that pardon and as featured at WVW Broadcast Network, Lt. Generals Flynn and McInerney gave an interview – this being Flynn’s first since his pardon – on Friday evening, which we covered and took-in Saturday. It is substantial.

What follows is an itemized list of confirmations of our reporting relative to the interview and it, too, is substantial given the positions verified:

  • McInerney wasted no getting to brass tacks: “The treason that has been committed against this administration, this country and this president.”

Flynn then spoke mostly uninterrupted providing the following:

  • Flynn: “Going through a crucible of history.”
  • CONFIRMED: Election is “the greatest fraud in our history” with clear paths forward that don’t require much save “honesty” from American elected officials.
  • Individuals receiving threats for submitting evidence
  • PA, AZ, GA, NV, MI and WI will be won by President Trump
  • CONFIRMED: Legitimate win was a landslide: 350-400 electoral votes
  • Two-plus decades long plan by China (CCP) to supplant the US as the sole global superpower by the middle of the current century was accelerated more recently as driven by the interruption as caused by Trump’s unexpected (un-rigged) 2016 win
  • CONFIRMED: The unexpected 2016 loss served as the catalyst to prevent a 2020 win: mail-in voting, Dominion/Smartmatic exploitation
  • CONFIRMED: Dominion/Smartmatic is owned by foreign entities (Venezuelan government)
  • Current strategies entail direct and indirect approaches
  • 1st Amendment issues bear down as corporations (MSM and SM) are silencing/censoring the President and knowing this is a choke point for him given the complicity of the broader MSM in all of this and its patently and demonstrable duplicitous coverage of the president
  • CONFIRMED: “I think what we experienced over the last 4 years and certainly in the late 2016 early 2017 period, was a very strong effort to unseat a duly elected president.” (dead horse)
  • The early effort was devised to cause Trump to remove himself from the political arena and return to the private sector and when it became unsuccessful, the effort galvanized and gained in momentum
  • CONFIRMED: First Phase: “Fake Russiagate,” “fake spygate,” “fake impeachment,” and “the COVID situation we’re having to deal with now” (The longstanding and exclusive Political Moonshine political continuum: Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment, COVID-19, race riots/domestic terrorism, engineered race war, stolen election.)
  • CONFIRMED: Second Phase: Remaining a “coup in progress,” a prior decision had been made not to allow 2016 “to happen again” ergo phase one was transitioned and advanced as demonstrated by senior Democrats like Hillary Clinton, who came months before the election demanding that Biden not concede no matter what
  • CONFIRMED: When your enemy tells you that they are going to do something, you better pay attention to what they say and you better have some plans.” (Trump’s executive order on election interference and Pelosi’s July 2019 COG warning bear down here)
  • CONFIRMED: The Democratic Socialist party has overtaken; usurped, the Democratic Party and they are a very loud voice (Demonstrated by how Bernie Sanders ONLY functions to drive party left, is never intended to win and had the primary nomination stolen in 2016 and 2020)
  • CONFIRMED: On election day, the electronic manipulations to the vote did not achieve the intended result required to steal the election because the returns for Trump were too sizable
  • CONFIRMED: Hammer/Scorecard/Scytl/Dominion/Smartmatic plays were rendered ineffective on election night causing battleground states to simultaneously shutdown in unprecedented terms and quit counting votes late on election night
  • CONFIRMED: Overnight, the vote result began to be augmented with massive amounts of fraudulent paper ballots being infused (printed in real time or previously printed by and ordered from China) from 04 Nov – 07 Nov
  • This is an ongoing effort
  • CONFIRMED: The US has participated in similar stolen elections previously (CIA, etc.) as a function of US global hegemony “in other third world nations”
  • CONFIRMED: The war is cyber-based and centers on the leveraging of information relative to the intended target and inundating the target(s) with propagandized information: MSM, “tech companies”/SM, etc. & “It’s more than” “brainwashing,” “information warfare,” “psychological operations” and “programming”
  • Chinese doctrine has 6 phases and the first 5 phases all have to do with information; and not until the 6th does it become kinetic
  • CONFIRMED: The assault on President Trump is an assault on the American Republic
  • Only state legislatures (not the MSM) can certify elections and if there is ongoing litigation, the election can’t be certified (basic civics) – “they’re (the MSM) trying to shove it down our throat”
  • The important bits of information are not in soundbites but inside the legal filings in each state.

Lt. General Flynn, who was participating via cell phone left the interview altogether and it continued with McInerney and with more astounding confirmations of previous reporting.

  • CONFIRMED: “It is a fast moving train,” “the most unprecedented situation in the history of America,” “the most dangerous situation since the Civil War in keeping this nation united”
  • Cyber warfare is hidden and often difficult to predict until its deployment and arrival
  • CONFIRMED: Hammer/Scorecard were predicted applications of treason that manifested as predicted
  • CONFIRMED: The easiest lens through which to understand all of this is simply that the technologies developed by and for the US are now being used against it (cyber warfare and related technologies) to seize control of the country and by enlisting the MSM; including Fox News, “who flipped on us” leveraging the 1st Amendment with a bifurcated approach: censor the truth while delivering (deep) state-sponsored propaganda
  • Constitutional processes and their underpinning timelines, such as the vote as per the electoral college, are not congruent with the timeline that underpins the modern era and the Founding Fathers did not possess the foresight to reconcile this at the time ergo, this dynamic is being exploited as per the First Amendment as outlined
  • CONFIRMED: The 14 Dec 20 electoral college vote and 20 Jan 21 inauguration day bear down on the above timeline considerations relative to their exploitation as per the First Amendment and this is either being missed or intentionally neglected in the courts
  • The President should not concede and should remain in office until the facts are examined as demanded by the American people
  • CONFIRMED: Vote count distribution in PA, WI, MI, AZ, NV & GA are not based upon “normal system operations” rather they’re caused by “fraudulent electronic manipulation of targeted voting machines”
  • CONFIRMED: 0230 EST on 04 Nov 20, PA, WI, MI, AZ, NV & GA “unanimously” decided to “intentionally” shut down vote counting in “unprecedented” terms and “demonstrates prior coordination by election officials”
  • CONFIRMED: Vote counting did NOT stop during that time: MI received 138,000 votes at 0400 and all for Biden
  • CONFIRMED: Biden was behind in PA, WI, MI, AZ, NV & GA before vote counting was shut down and Hammer/Scorecard/Dominion/Smartmatic deployed to further augment the vote result
  • CONFIRMED: Mathematical impossibilities present because the vote augmentations were assigned by percentage – the exact same percentage – which delivers different vote totals respective to the number of eligible voters in a district
  • CONFIRMED: The above augmentations speak to algorithms deployed as per Hammer/Scorecard leveraging the technique of fractional voting, which leverages embedded and hidden subroutines that fractionalize the vote with decimals
  • CONFIRMED: In GA, 96,000 votes were excluded due to a water main break that didn’t happen
  • CONFIRMED: In PA, 1.8 million ballots with no chain of custody (not absentee ballots) were mailed out while 2.5 million came back; accounting for 700k votes of unknown origin indicative of votes being literally manufactured in real time by means of printing them
  • NEW: The Kraken is verified as being the 305 Military Intelligence Battalion that is working with Trump, Flynn, Powell, Wood & Giuliani
  • CONFIRMED: On the overt and “friendly” side, there are no footprints for the DOJ, FBI and CIA but on the covert, unfriendly and “Deep State” side, there are footprints for the DOJ, FBI and CIA
  • NEW: The Kraken/305 are a primary source complimented by other unnamed and confidential sources
  • CONFIRMED: China, Iran and Russia are identified “as being involved in this and manipulating the votes.”
  • CONFIRMED: The US special forces command seized a US/CIA server farm (Scytl) in Frankfut, Germany (via Spain) whereby the vote totals for PA, WI, MI, AZ, NV & GA were transmitted there for augmentation and so as to avoid leaving a digital footprint in the US
  • CONFIRMED: All servers and all data are in hand and driving the President’s (Wood, Powell, Giuliani) efforts
  • The US raid was NOT without incident as 5 US soldiers are stated to have lost their lives in the raid
  • CONFIRMED: Flynn has been privy to all of this for a long time
  • The nature of the operation was actually “trivial” and it’s the magnitude of the result that bears relevance
  • CONFIRMED: The legislative branch was specifically identified as a player in all things and by name, Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer: “the Russian hoax” and the “coup d’etat”
  • CONFIRMED: The judicial branch was specifically identified as a player and by name, Judge Emmet Sullivan
  • The 305 was selected for the operation because they could be trusted and it compliments the move of Acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller to consolidate control over Special Operations
  • CONFIRMED: “This is treason, what we’re talking about”
  • CONFIRMED: Hammer/Scorecard deployed by Obama/Biden to win FL in 2012
  • CONFIRMED: Democrats used it twice against Bernie Sanders in the primaries
  • CONFIRMED: “We haven’t seen treason of this magnitude ever in our history”
  • CONFIRMED: Christopher Krebs/CIFSA identified as “guilty of treason”
  • CONFIRMED: Indicates likely battle ahead in SCOTUS
  • Although a path is available, it’s known that the Democrats will try to shut it down politically meaning Americans must demand due process and investigations
  • CONFIRMED: Mary Fanning identifies the “man in the middle” to steal the election – is this Brennan?
  • CONFIRMED: Fanning: Iran and China (Russia) committed acts of “treason” and “war”
  • CONFIRMED: Fox News and individuals within it are identified as “guilty of treason”
  • CONFIRMED: Obama, Biden, Pelosi, & Schiff were all named individually as being responsible for the same treason
  • CONFIRMED: The work of Barr and Durham must be examined
  • CONFIRMED: The President’s Executive Order on election interference is situated to bear down significantly and is reflective of 3 things: foreknowledge, a play and his assumed “lying in wait” posture
  • Fanning identifies “Wild Turkey” and “Medusa” as exploits working of Hammer (Dennis Montgomery)
  • Duplicitous reporters will attempt to cast their net of over these developments to control the narrative
  • CONFIRMED: After being created by Montgomery in 2003 and a few weeks after Obama was inaugurated, Hammer was put into place and installed on servers by John Brennan and James Clapper using computers provided by the FBI under Robert Mueller’s direction at the time
  • CONFIRMED: Fanning situates the Biden family and it’s billions dollar deals with China and Ukraine to sell-out the US as the primary focus of the American people
  • CONFIRMED: China, Iran and Russia bought US officials and the MSM to drive the overthrow
  • Fanning outlines how Saddam Hussein’s primary nuclear scientist, Dr. Jafar, and the Russians, who bought-out Sidco (Venezuela), managed to exploit oil and energy terminals to import weapons of mass destruction into the US in FL (Pearl Harbor 2.0)

This single interview galvanizes many positions – some longstanding – and provides an accurate picture of where all of this is headed, the lion’s share already predicted and established in our work. Most importantly, it confirms that our previous reporting is accurate and this helps to further develop the clearer picture moving forward.

Here’s the full interview.

-End-

Biden Likely Enveloped by DOJ Press Release Linking Iran and Venezuela

On Wednesday, the Department of Justice issued a press release that we began taking to task in the previous article, which is necessary backdrop for what follows. From that article, here’s a brief recapitulation of what the DOJ outlined.

According to the DOJ press release (emphasis added),

Natalino D’Amato, 61, of Venezuela, was charged in an 11-count indictment filed in the Southern District of Florida.  D’Amato was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, four counts of international money laundering, three counts of promotional money laundering, and three counts of engaging in transactions involving criminally derived property.

The indictment alleges that, beginning in January 2013 and continuing through December 2017, D’Amato conspired with others, including officials at joint ventures between PDVSA and various foreign companies in the oil-rich Orinoco belt of Venezuela, to launder the proceeds of an illegal bribery scheme to and from bank accounts located in South Florida.  These joint ventures were majority owned and controlled by PDVSA.  According to the indictment, D’Amato offered and paid bribes to numerous Venezuelan officials who worked at the PDVSA joint ventures in order to obtain highly inflated and lucrative contracts to provide goods and services to the PDVSA joint ventures.  The indictment further alleges that over the course of the conspiracy, companies controlled by D’Amato received approximately $160 million from the PDVSA joint ventures into accounts he controlled in South Florida.  According to the charges, D’Amato used a portion of those funds to make payments to or for the benefit of the Venezuelan officials.

Let’s revisit what is known about Joe Biden and what is covered extensively – sourced and cited – on this website. The evidence demonstrates that Biden is:

  • Completely owned and compromised by China and the CCP
  • Fully behind and integral to the conspiracy to remove President Trump and overthrow the US government vis-a-vis China, the CCP, Iran, Venezuela and Cuba and including the stolen 2020 election
  • Deeply tied to myriad crimes in Ukraine and especially in the energy sector and allegedly in human trafficking and with other suspected energy sector enterprises in Brazil and multitudes other nations across the globe
  • Deeply enmeshed in the conspiracy with Iran to develop a rogue nuclear arsenal to be leveraged against Western governments to herd them into desired geopolitical positions and as made possible by the well-over $150 billion that Obama provided Iran and as baked into the laws framing the failed JCPOA
  • Recall this is all occurring against the backdrop of Obama’s normalization of diplomatic relations with Cuba and against the backdrop of Cuba’s relevance as noted above

Moving forward, let’s begin with new material that stands to link the Biden crime family to the matters at hand. As we get into it and as I’ve mentioned before with much of this, the landscape is deep, broad and complex so what we are doing is cursory level work to establish connections. That endeavor is entirely different than presenting evidence sufficient to prove more or meet a standard for the burden of proof commensurate with the civil standard of preponderance of the evidence or the criminal one of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The first order of business is finding entities resting in between the Bidens and those associated with the press release: Natalino D’Amato, Venezuela, South Florida and PDVSA.

To demonstrate the complexity here, consider the two primary corporations that link to the Biden crime family – Rosemont Seneca and Boahai Harvest. Bohai Harvest alone has 680 offshore entities, 101 officers, 12 intermediaries and 35 global locations that span Hong Kong, Luxembourg, Singapore, Jersey, Switzerland Guernsey, UK, Isle of Man, China, Panama, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Malta, Seychelles, Bahamas, and more.

Here is one example from Bohai Harvest’s 12 intermediaries that serves as an exemplar of how this all peels back like an onion and whereby each layer diverges like a spiderweb. In this case, Grand Harvest Consultants LTD depicts how each of the Bohai Harvest entities generates this type of hub and spoke map.

This type of hub and spoke map can be generated for each of the remaining 11 Bohai Harvest intermediaries and each of its 680 offshore entities and the 101 officers. For each of those, which totals 793 altogether, a hub and spoke map would be generated and each spoke would be run to its end point, which in turn would create another hub and spoke map. Rinse/repeat. You could do this for a very long time.

All of this would represent the tip of the iceberg and as you can see, it is a daunting task and so we stay cursory in our examination.

Thorough efforts to tie D’Amato directly to Biden were fruitless, as expected, and so it made sense to vector from known Biden interfaces: Bohai Harvest and Rosemont Seneca.

Starting there and vectoring back towards Venezuela, our focus naturally drew upon PDVSA (we assert that the Biden’s were leveraging energy markets and natural gas, specifically, to move money relative to their criminal enterprises) and PDVSA is state-owned [Venezuela], has Russian entanglements and ties to Dominion/Smartmatic by it’s state ownership [Venezuela.]

After several hours of work, the best laid evidence can be found in work that brings PDVSA to light relative to an established and known entity is Rosneft – Russia’s largest oil producer.

This is Rosneft.

Rosneft should sound familiar to you and we’re moving in that direction. What connects us to Rosneft is Hunter Biden (Joe Biden), China, the CCP, Patrick Ho and his entity, CEFC, which we first brought to your attention in March. The takeaway here to keep things succinct is viewing CEFC as the linkage between the Bidens and China ergo we draw down on how PDVSA may link to CEFC/China.

Let’s consider the nature and timing of Rosneft transactions and developments (copy/paste from linked sources, emphasis added) understanding that we are applying our known fact sets to understand how Russia and Venezuela combine to situate Russia in the Western Hemisphere and whereas Russian money is being infused to a communist nation that directly interfered in the 2020 US election:

  • 15 Apr 18: As Riddle reports, “Given Rosneft was cut off from much of the Western financing that its politically-dominant position in Russia had given it easy access to, after the implementation of US sanctions it has been forced to find new ways to secure loans. And although its December 2014 financial engineering did not result in significant political costs, its practices have certainly improved, although they may well indeed still pose as much risk. Firstly, significant questions remain over the financing structure of the December 2016 sale of a stake in the firm to oil trader Glencore and the Qatar Investment Authority, particularly as the one Western bank, Italy’s Intesa San Paolo, that was willing to partake in the loan was reportedly unable to syndicate the deal amongst other banks. There are now doubts that the sale of the majority of this stake to China’s CEFC China Energy, another business tie-up in large part motivated by political considerations, following reports that CEFC’s founder was detained at the beginning of March and that the Chinese state is now managing the firm, and with Chinese media reporting the country’s banks are hesitant to finance the deal as well.”
  • 06 Nov 19: Geopolitical Monitor reported in October 2019 that “Russian media suggested that Russian energy conglomerate Rosneft has plans to consolidate Venezuela’s National Oil Company PDVSA (Petroleos de Venezuela) under Rosneft’s corporate structure in exchange for debt relief. This would seem to keep U.S., Canadian, and Mexican oil and natural gas firms from satisfying natural gas demand from non-OECD Asia. Additionally, it allows Moscow to use Rosneft’s acquisition of Venezuelan natural gas as a geopolitical coercion tool by acquiring a piece of some of the largest recoverable oil and natural gas reserves in the world. The Maduro regime will also need to navigate the $20-$60 billion in debt owed to China. Will the Chinese also have a stake in PDVSA? If so, how does that play into the current US-China trade negotiations? What these geopolitical decisions point to is a Rosneft-PDVSA merger that brings more questions than answers. Military troops and hardware were used to save the Assad regime, and now in Venezuela it will be oil, natural gas, and petrochemicals that gives Russia a solid foothold in the western hemisphere. PDVSA is one of the world’s most prolific oil companies with the largest extractable oil and gas reserves in the world – estimated at 300 billion barrels, and PDVSA’s estimated worth is “approximately $186 billion.”
  • 08 Dec 19: World Oil reports that a “subsidiary of Rosneft has taken over some contract discussions with local service providers in Venezuela, stepping in for PDVSA on joint projects with the state-owned oil company, according to people familiar with the matter; representing a major turnabout for PDVSA, which in the past typically operated all aspects of the joint ventures, said the people, who asked not to be named because the talks with the service providers aren’t public. Rosneft now trades much of Venezuela’s oil from an office in Panama staffed with former PDVSA employees. Rosneft receives oil as part of its joint ventures with PDVSA, and also as repayment for loans. It’s not subject to U.S. sanctions that restrict American refiners from importing Venezuelan crude.”
  • 28 Mar 20: Russia’s largest oil producer, Rosneft ROSN.MM, said on Saturday “it had terminated operations in Venezuela and sold the assets linked to its operations in the South American nation to an unnamed company owned by the Russian government. By withdrawing from Venezuela and passing its assets to an entity owned by Moscow, Rosneft, headed by Igor Sechin, a close ally of President Vladimir Putin, transfers the risks related to its Venezuelan operations to the Russian government. Rosneft spokesman Mikhail Leontiyev told Reuters the decision to terminate operations in Venezuela was meant to protect the company’s shareholders. Rosneft would not disclose the name of the company to which it had sold its Venezuelan operations. Russia’s ambassador to Venezuela, Sergei Melik-Bagdasarov, wrote on Twitter that the deal would allow the two countries to continue working together. “Don’t worry! This is about the transfer of Rosneft’s assets in Venezuela to Russia’s government directly. We will remain together going forward,” he wrote on Twitter. Rosneft said it would be receiving a settlement payment worth a 9.6% share of Rosneft’s equity capital that would be held by a subsidiary. It did not say which of its shareholders was responsible for transferring the 9.6% stake.”
  • 10 Apr 20: The Center for International and Cultural Studies reports that “Rosneft’s exit marks an important shift in Russia’s policy toward Venezuela. Ultimately, it came down to sacrificing business profit over political gain. This withdrawal is a clear signal that U.S. sanctions have succeeded in further isolating the Maduro regime. Given the current global oil prices, state-owned Roszarubezhneft is unlikely to have enough financial and technical capacity to fully replace Rosneft as a lifeline of the Maduro regime. The withdrawal will ultimately make it much more difficult for the regime to stay afloat by restricting oil exports and limiting gas imports. Meanwhile, Rosneft became the financial arm that supported the Maduro regime; it prepaid PDVSA for crude and refined products as the regime’s other major ally, China, began to lag its payments. In 2014, as the Maduro government experienced shortages in foreign currency, Rosneft supplied PDVSA with 6.5 billion dollars in loans and advanced payments. In December 2016, Rosneft also provided a $1.5 billion loan collateralized with 49.9 percent of Citgo Holdings, PDVSA’s refinery in the United States. Consequently, through Rosneft and a consortium of private Russian oil companies, Putin tried to kill two birds with one stone in Venezuela: advance Russian geopolitical interests in the Caribbean and make economically sustainable investment deals. In 2014 Rosneft bought out those companies’ stakes in a primary project in the Orinoco basin.”
  • 13 Nov 20: Immediately following the stolen election, OilPrice.com reported that “the head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Asdrubal Chavez, and Venezuelan vice-president and economy minister Delcy Rodriguez are visiting Russia today to “deepen strategic alliances,” Reuters reported, citing a statement issued by the Venezuelan information ministry. State energy giant Rosneft had a joint venture with PDVSA for years before it was forced to up and leave the country after the United States targeted two of its subsidiaries with Venezuela-related sanctions. Yet Russia did not exit Venezuela. Soon after Rosneft announced its pullout, Moscow set up a new state-owned company named Roszarubezhneft, which received Rosneft’s Venezuelan assets. “The first thing this law did was to declare illegal any type of unilateral, restrictive or punitive coercive measure against Venezuela. We do not recognize them, they do not exist in our territory,” Rodriguez said.”

The peculiar landscape of PDVSA and Rosneft transactions occurred relative to US sanctions and they functioned to circumvent them at the same time they were declared by Venezuela to be illegal and therefore unrecognizable. Then and immediately on the heels of the stolen election, Venezuela ratcheted-up diplomatic relations with Russia to be leveraged back against the US in anticipation of a Biden arrival, or so it would seem.

Consider this from the Financial Times and take note of the countries named relative to the ones already outlined while also recognizing Mr. Trump’s primary motivation.

Here is a look at what prompted the US action, what it could mean for Venezuela and how Russia has reacted. Why has the US imposed sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil company, Rosneft? The Trump administration wants to force Mr Maduro to step down and agree to fresh elections, as it considers his 2018 election victory fraudulent. Venezuela’s once wealthy economy has collapsed over the past four years, with GDP shrinking by more than two-thirds, but Mr Maduro has so far clung to power with the support of his key allies: Russia, Cuba, Turkey and China.

Did you catch it? Simply stated, the energy business equates to the election business and all of the bucks transferred in between. Or, in other words, the Trump administration sanctioned Venezuela and Russia relative to communist leadership and stolen elections as much as they did oil.

Distilling it all down to one sentence, Venezuela and Russia have been and are working in the context of oil and energy to permit Russia an effective geopolitical footprint in the Western Hemisphere.

Here, we draw back on previous work to cinch the noose tighter around Quid Pro Joe’s neck.

How and why do we know Rosneft as stated above?

It was first outlined in our article entitled The Promise of Dark Winter.

A quick sidebar on Barr – I’ve consistently delineated concerns over institutional preservation relative to Barr and his apparent complete dearth of anything resembling indictments and prosecutions of people who matter. Currently there are none. I’ve also left the door ajar for him up through a short window of time after 20 Jan 21. I care to tell you that on good authority, he just may prove me wrong and walk through that door. We’ll see. I hope I’m wrong. I digress.

From the article,

Now consider this from the same.

It gets worse. We move on to more previous work in All Holds Barred and the linkage here was considering why Wray/FBI and Barr/DOJ had done nothing in regards to the Biden/CEFC deal and scenario. This caused us to examine the backgrounds of Wray and Barr. The key tie-in for Barr is Kirkland & Ellis LLP and specifically, the times he served there. This from the article,

Here’s Barr’s resume from the same.

What’s so important about Kirkland & Ellis? This and this and this. Those are three additional articles that explain how Kirkland & Ellis, while Barr was there, functioned as described in the second linked article and here, below.

The linkage here is Staple Street Capital. Look where it takes us from the same article,

Still focusing on Dominion and Staple Street Capital, look at where it takes us as found in the third linked article.

Latching onto HSBC Toronto, drew-in Sequoia Capital and we discoverd the following from the same article,

The road down Sequoia Capital ended up in the California PERS system. Here’s a recapitulation from that same article.

Who has seems to run a spoke into ever hub we look at? Joe Biden? Yeah. Joe Biden.

We’ll close with two items. Firstly, the quote that got us going in the first part of this. Take everything I’ve outlined and apply it to the Quid Pro Joe details that follow.

An opposition deputy from the Justice First (Primero Justicia) party close to self-proclaimed interim president Guaido told Al Jazeera he is worried that Biden will want to negotiate with Maduro and that he may ease some of the Trump administration’s hard-line political stances and economic sanctions. He asked not to use his name to discuss politics in the deeply polarised country.

“Trump has been a strong ally. He has shown that he means business and that he will not back down on the demand for the departure of Maduro and his cronies,” that opposition politician said.

Venezuela’s state-owned oil company PDVSAthe country’s economic lifeline – has also been hit with US sanctions, adding to the suffering of the Venezuelan people.

Biden has expressed his desire to resume diplomacy with OPEC members Venezuela and Iran, which could eventually lead to the return of their oil exports if certain conditions are met, Reuters News Agency reported.

Secondly, this reminder from Sidney Powell’s lawsuit in Georgia and with the recalling Dominion/Smartmatic’s Venezuelan roots, ownership and genesis.

So yes, given the back drop of what I’ve provided here and previously, I believe that the DOJ press release will eventually be shown to tie back to Quid Pro Joe Biden. We established important, meaningful and actual nexuses between the associated players involved, the entities in which they are enmeshed, the nature of those entities and the means, methods, practices and operations of each. It all shows that the Bidens seem to have a spoon in every pot and all the pots appear to boiling on the same range: energy sector corruption, a fake pandemic, a stolen election, an overthrow conspiracy, you name it.

How long before we learn the identity of that South Florida Bank and the relative evidence that may come from it?

Will DOJ Press Release Envelop Biden With Iran and Venezuela?

On Wednesday, the Department of Justice issued a press release that reasonably stands a chance to impact the current timeline. It’s certainly worthy of further pursuit and it didn’t take long to pick up a scent trail.

According to the DOJ press release (emphasis added),

Natalino D’Amato, 61, of Venezuela, was charged in an 11-count indictment filed in the Southern District of Florida.  D’Amato was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, four counts of international money laundering, three counts of promotional money laundering, and three counts of engaging in transactions involving criminally derived property.

The indictment alleges that, beginning in January 2013 and continuing through December 2017, D’Amato conspired with others, including officials at joint ventures between PDVSA and various foreign companies in the oil-rich Orinoco belt of Venezuela, to launder the proceeds of an illegal bribery scheme to and from bank accounts located in South Florida.  These joint ventures were majority owned and controlled by PDVSA.  According to the indictment, D’Amato offered and paid bribes to numerous Venezuelan officials who worked at the PDVSA joint ventures in order to obtain highly inflated and lucrative contracts to provide goods and services to the PDVSA joint ventures.  The indictment further alleges that over the course of the conspiracy, companies controlled by D’Amato received approximately $160 million from the PDVSA joint ventures into accounts he controlled in South Florida.  According to the charges, D’Amato used a portion of those funds to make payments to or for the benefit of the Venezuelan officials.

Let’s revisit what is known about Joe Biden and what is covered extensively – sourced and cited – on this website. The evidence demonstrates that Biden is:

  • Completely owned and compromised by China and the CCP
  • Fully behind and integral to the conspiracy to remove President Trump and overthrow the US government vis-a-vis China, the CCP, Iran, Venezuela and Cuba and including the stolen 2020 election
  • Deeply tied to myriad crimes in Ukraine and especially in the energy sector and allegedly in human trafficking and with other suspected energy sector enterprises in Brazil and multitudes other nations across the globe
  • Deeply enmeshed in the conspiracy with Iran to develop a rogue nuclear arsenal to be leveraged against Western governments to herd them into desired geopolitical positions and as made possible by the well-over $150 billion that Obama provided Iran and as baked into the laws framing the failed JCPOA
  • Recall this is all occurring against the backdrop of Obama’s normalization of diplomatic relations with Cuba and against the backdrop of Cuba’s relevance as noted above

You can go deeper on Biden corruption HERE and HERE and on the site in general. Also know that I projected Biden as a placeholder candidate for a lot of reasons previously reported; expecting Hillary’s late entrance in his stead.

I got that wrong in the details because it didn’t matter who, or rather how un-electable, the candidate would be because the play was always a steal and one that would be leveraged to drag anything important, including the vote result, past inauguration day.

There is still a window for HRC’s entrance, so we’ll see. It would occur if Biden were inaugurated and whereby he would either voluntarily remove himself or be removed in relatively short order and whereby Harris would succeed him opening a window for her to select Hillary as her vice president.

Better watch your back, Kamala. Better stay socially distanced from the Clintons and their buddies.

God forbid that Hillary could actually see that through and in what would be typical and sleezy Clinton fashion for it would have her bypassing running, campaigning, debating or even ever answering a single tough question about her qualifications and compromises. Rather she would have entered through the back door and removed the one person that invited her in but stood in her way. As stated – God forbid.

Returning to the matters at hand, let’s remember that South Florida is a hotbed for Democratic Party antics and copious amounts of voter fraud and corruption. That draws our interest relative to the location of the bank located there and being used as described.

Here’s our first search result from Aljazeera and note the overlaps relative to what’s outlined above (emphasis added) and apply them for meaning.

An opposition deputy from the Justice First (Primero Justicia) party close to self-proclaimed interim president Guaido told Al Jazeera he is worried that Biden will want to negotiate with Maduro and that he may ease some of the Trump administration’s hard-line political stances and economic sanctions. He asked not to use his name to discuss politics in the deeply polarised country.

“Trump has been a strong ally. He has shown that he means business and that he will not back down on the demand for the departure of Maduro and his cronies,” that opposition politician said.

Venezuela’s state-owned oil company PDVSAthe country’s economic lifeline – has also been hit with US sanctions, adding to the suffering of the Venezuelan people.

Biden has expressed his desire to resume diplomacy with OPEC members Venezuela and Iran, which could eventually lead to the return of their oil exports if certain conditions are met, Reuters News Agency reported.

What do you think the chances are that Quid Pro Joe is somehow connected to easing sanctions on Venezuela at the same time Venezuela directly interfered in the 2020 election to help him win and that just perhaps, the money trail ties back to Biden? What are the chances the DOJ selectively released this now given the building mountain of similar evidence lately? I don’t believe in coincidences.

Do you now see why this has my attention? Take a look on the website and go to the ‘Threads‘ page – you’ll see copious amounts of evidence of Biden’s energy corruption in Ukraine and elsewhere. Check out the ‘keystone’ articles. There’s plenty more to read about, too.

Questions: Which nation was it that used Dominion/Smartmatic systems to steal an election in 2012? Venezuela. Which country owns PDVSA? Venezuela (and Russia.) For which country was the Dominion/Smartmatic software first developed to steal elections? Venezuela. Which country is entangled in terms of ownership? Venezuela (and China). What was the conduit to facilitate Biden’s global corruption? The energy sector and especially natural gas. What are the established methods for the Bidens and the rest of them to move money and veil evidence? Shell corporations and money laundering. Who was it that recently and publicly stated that they cared to ease sanctions against a known foreign enemy in Venezuela (and Iran)? Biden?

Does this warrant asking a whole hell of a lot more questions?

Yes.

It stacks-up just thinking about it. I’m clocking-out to drink a bourbon and watch some football. I’ll return to this tomorrow with the hopes it bears fruit.

I can’t imagine it won’t.