BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA, BIG MONEY: Full Circle to the D.C. Swamp Part II – Political Contributions by BlackRock and Vanguard

As of late, the writing at Moonshine has taken the form of recapitulating old positions in light of new evidence to present a broader and more comprehensive understanding to the complex, intricate, nebulous, vast, deep, wide and treasonous effort by a Globalist cabal determined to undo the United States in favor of “building it back better” by refashioning her into a socialist, Marxist and communist hell hole. Early on in all of it and back in late 2019/early 2020 I advised that our emerging catalog of developing work would age like fine wine and I stated this as others were still trying to parse it all out as if the “pandemic” were anything but entirely fraudulent. My statement about fine wine holds truer now than it did then.

In a substantially heavy lift yesterday (about 18 hours worth diagramming and writing in basically one sitting), we accomplished several substantial objectives: 1) In a complete review of existing work and presenting 29 cataloged articles in the backdrop of it, I mapped-out the entities and individuals we’ve identified from all of the relevant vectors and how they are enmeshed together, 2) We re-established President Trump’s 3 primary markers on the generational political continuum (BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA & BIG MONEY), 3) We threaded that effort through from China and its One Belt, One Road doctrine to the end point in private equity with BlackRock and Vanguard Group, 4) We bridged to work from Dr. Joseph Mercola at The Defender relative to BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA and 5) we focused on the circular flow of money that is normally inherent in fraudulent constructs.

The discovery of the newer Mercola article during research allowed me to shift the focus of that article as I wrote it and in so doing, I sarcastically left open the question about our likely circular flow of money; and remembering that it would most likely occurr within the energy sector, as established. I closed that piece with three endings and here are two,

Or, perhaps this is the best one and as I said before, hell, we’re talking BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA under the same precarious-to-find ownership by BIG MONEY and BIG MEDIA is driving the company message or shall we say, force-feeding Kool-Aid elixir to the people. Now, pick up that heaping pile of shit and thrown it squarely into the middle of the D.C. swamp.

Is it even worth looking at the original intent here? Remember what it was? Determining whether there is a circular flow of money relative to campaign donations from BIG PHARMA. 

What do you think? 

Oh yeah, Bill Barr is worth $40-$74 million. 

And Wray? $23-$40 million circa 2017. 

You tell me.

The answer is yes – it’s DEFINITELY worth examining so let’s get to it. As we do, remember that our premise is absolute control of all relevant vectors by ownership via private equity and atop all of it and including BIG PHARMA – our focus today – is BlackRock and Vanguard.

Moving forward, it’s important to recall a presumed fact relative to the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and it’s as simple as saying that a cohort of good forces and likely including military ones “un-rigged” the 2016 election to deliver a legitimate win in an outlier president in Trump. That one aspect is explanatory for so many anomalies that many can’t seem to get right and it’s because they’re working with the wrong details.

Acknowledging that the 2016 election rests on a generational political continuum devised to infiltrate and overthrow the U.S. government for the Globalist cabal, we establish that forces working to this extent fully expected Clinton to give a victory speech on election night and when she couldn’t, they were entirely caught-out – ENTIRELY caught out. This short Ben Rhodes video is the absolute best descriptor to understand this critical dynamic.

So what does this dynamic tell us? It tell us that “the swamp” expected, knew and planned for a Clinton victory because that’s how it was predetermined. It also tells us that when things are predetermined in a place like D.C., the evidence of the money will either confirm or deny it. So we follow the money and in this case, we start by examining campaign contributions for 2016.

By industry, BIG PHARMA is outside of the top five contributors but it matters not relative to the private equity ownership of BIG PHARMA and that’s where BlackRock and Vanguard bear down with fully might.

Immediately we latch onto private equity (“Securities & Investments”), law firms and of course, energy (“Oil and Gas”). In particular, remember that I have established ENERGY as the conduit to move money and the Biden crime family brokered one private equity deal in energy after another. These core components to all things are intricately delineated in our primary diagram above.

From the same source, consider that in 2016,

Who did those donors expect to win? Clinton or Trump?

More specific to BIG PHARMA and as sourced from CNN, you tell me – which one of these BIG PHARMA recipients appears to be the outlier and which one appears to be the predetermined winner?

Understand an important underpinning element here and it’s one we’ve detailed before. Prior to the 2016 election, Clinton was pushing a prescription drug plan antithetical to the financial interests of BIG PHARMA and specifically, it sought to force lower prescription drug prices by means of legislation.

Factor that into the equation as you examine the contributions by candidate above. Who do you think BIG PHARMA expected (knew) would win?

From the article (emphasis mine),

Their biggest recipient? Clinton. She collected $336,416 in donations, over a third of the total contributions during the 2016 presidential campaign. The next biggest recipient was Republican candidate Jeb Bush, who collected less than half the amount of Clinton. Trump received the least in donations: $1,010, enough to buy one Daraprim pill.

To the fraud investigator, this manifests as an expression of intent.

If we consider health care on a broader scope and inclusive of BIG PHARMA, it pushes “healthcare” into the top 3 donors.

That’s important for what you see outlined here. I established early on that a series of diagnostic memos issued by the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) to medical providers writ large baked into the construct financial incentives for medical providers to diagnose COVID-19 over the underlying co-morbidities actually responsible for patients’ illnesses.

How or why is that important? It provides a robust system of fraudulent financial rewards to incentivize desired diagnoses in order to generate the needed data drivers for the fraudulent pandemic. Or, in other words, the NIAID/Collins/NIH/Fauci/NVSS cohort – the cohort that controls FUNDING – was literally paying doctors in federal dollars to deliver the data by means of the diagnosis.

From OpenSecrets.org, consider these election cycle data points for 2016, 2018 and 2020. We’ll begin with an overview.

OVERVIEW: 2016, 2018 & 2020 ELECTION CYCLE CONTRIBUTIONS

Immediately we draw a distinction between 2020 and the other years as 2020 stands-out as anomalous for its exponential increase in contributions relative to 2016 and 2018.

I don’t believe in coincidences just like I didn’t when Obama de-funded the CDC at the same time he increased funding to the WHO prior to leaving office and as comporting with the 2017 timeline we kick like a dead horse (and for good reason) and specifically the date Obama inserted the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic construct into the Trump administration during compulsory transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. Like I said, I don’t believe in coincidences.

We also note that this is NOT a partisan issue rather, it’s an American issue as the culpability in all of it is reflected in the flow of money and electoral expectations appear to shape how that money flows.

Grabbing onto 2008 as comporting with Obama’s 2009 inauguration, we see a rough 50/50 split right up to 2020 and the 27 Dec 19 first report of the COVID-19 outbreak in the MSM. Notably in 2020, the rough 50/50 split shifts heavily in favor of the Democrats 62/38. Dead horse – I don’t believe in coincidences in as as much as money talks and bullshit walks.

Another notable data point is that BIG PHARMA ramped up contributions in 2016 to an unprecedented high of $64.9mm, then tapped the brakes in 2018 dropping to $44.6mm only to explode to a new all time high in 2020 of $89.6mm after the “unrigged” Trump victory. Following these contributions, the 2020 election was stolen and in a spate of treason, Trump was removed from office illegitimately. Dead horse; no coincidences.

We have one more overview data point to delineate and it is substantial and significant and it rests on another Moonshine position that underpins everything – the generational continuum or timeline. On that continuum, we situate the events of 9/11 and the subsequent “Patriot Act” as a sequential step that would lead to the COVID-19 “fake pandemic” construct. So, let’s see if the money evidences our position because it always does.

Between 1990-1998, BIG PHARMA contributions ranged from a relatively paltry $1.8mm to a more substantial $9.6mm. On the lead-up to 11 Sep 01 during the 2000 election cycle, we note a substantial increase from $8.7mm in 1998 to $19.1mm in 2000.

The 2000-2001 time frame sets a new benchmark for BIG PHARMA contributions as double digits become the norm increasing to $22.4mm in 2002. Dead horse; no coincidences.

The flow of the money supports the assertion(s.)

Are those increases accidental or enmeshed in the generational continuum I’ve worked so diligently to establish? Rhetorical question. It can’t be any other way in light of the full body of evidence we’ve established.

Let’s take a closer look at the election cycle contributions year over year.

2016

2018

2020

BLACKROCK & VANGUARD

With BlackRock and Vanguard Group central to all things here, they represent the bridge to private equity at the same time they serve as the holders of the corporations making contributions to U.S. political campaigns. BlackRock and Vanguard sit atop BIG MONEY and BIG MONEY owns BIG MEDIA and BIG TECH and they’re funding the politicians to deliver on established plans.

With that in mind, let’s dial down on the 20 top BIG PHARMA contributors in the stolen 2020 election and see if the positions align (with emphasis on vaccine manufacturers).

D.E. Shaw Research: private
Pulse Biosciences: owned by BlackRock (1), Vanguard (2)
Pfizer Inc.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Masimo Corp.: owned by BlackRock (1), Vanguard (2)
Alexion Pharmaceuticals: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Roche Holdings: Roche Holding AG (ROG.SW) is owned by Vanguard (1, 2)
Amgen Inc.: owned by BlackRock (1), Vanguard (2)
Johnson & Johnson: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
AbbVie Inc.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Abbott Laboratories: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Merck & Co.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Starkey Hearing Technologies: private
Eli Lilly & Co.: owned by Vanguard (2), BlackRock (3)
Medtronic Inc.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Synchrogenix: private
Bristol-Meyers Squibb: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
AmeriSource Bergen Corp.: owned by Vanguard (1), BlackRock (2)
Vital Pharmaceuticals: private
Novartis AG: owned by Vanguard (2, 5, 9, 10) [mutual funds]
AstraZeneca PLC: owned by Vanguard (1, 3, 6, 7) [mutual funds]

We began today’s endeavor by picking up where we left off yesterday – with BlackRock and Vanguard Group sitting atop private equity and having a spoon in about every single pot and especially so relative to BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY and as we know, they come to represent BIG MONEY on its face.

Today we delineated the financial and statistical anomalies relative to campaign contributions collectively and year over year and in light of yesterday’s work, what did we learn?

We learned that the same BIG MONEY forces – BlackRock and Vanguard – that drawn down, own and fund about everything were essentially the exclusive BIG PHARMA donors to the COVID-19 pandemic, the stolen 2020 election and all of the corrupt, criminal, seditious and treasonous politicians responsible for the ills that plague this once great and proud constitutional republic that now more closely resembles the shit hole banana republic they desire.

All of this – Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection” event and impeachment 2.0 – ultimately draws down on BlackRock and Vanguard Group and relative to that, don’t forget what I’ve reminded folks of times over and as revisited again yesterday where Mercola put it in his words,

The regulations in private equity make investigating it difficult and by most accounts, these corrupt politicians have their personal attorneys and financial advisors obscuring their investments in blind trusts. Still though and in the always persistent mode of identifying verifiable fraud with the circular flow of money, the next endeavor is identifying which politicians have holdings in BlackRock and Vanguard.

Regardless, about everything we’ve seen from these miscreants including our list of Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection” event and impeachment 2.0 is patently and abjectly demonstrable as FRAUD as much as it is sedition and treason and it all appears to have been funded by BlackRock and Vanguard.

I’ll leave you with this as Mercola so astutely indicated in his article,

The point being, if I’m wrong about all of this, then why did BlackRock and Vanguard see to it that that defining ownership would be nearly impossible? It’s because the entire system is fraudulent and rigged for them to accomplish stated nefarious objectives.

Can anyone prove that it isn’t?

-End-

BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA, BIG MONEY: Full Circle to the D.C. Swamp

On 17 Jun 21, the Biden administration announced its intent to allocate $3 billion from the ‘Save America Plan’ to invest in antiviral medications relative to COVID-19 and the patently and demonstrably fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic and the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Antiviral medications are generally taken orally and early in the infection timeline to mitigate the illness. Given the abundance of tedious and arduous investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic and our respective findings, through the lens of a fraud investigator, the decision raises several important questions but none more important than asking if this might be a circular flow of money.

The following were extracted from the NIAID/NIH press release,

Thanks to the American Rescue Plan, the Biden Administration is investing more than $3 billion to accelerate the discovery, development and manufacturing of antiviral medicines as part of the Biden Administration’s whole-of-government strategy to develop the next generation of COVID-19 treatments. 

Through collaboration within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), this plan – called the ‘Antiviral Program for Pandemics‘ – will respond to the urgent need for antivirals to treat COVID-19 by spurring the availability of medicines to prevent serious illness and save lives. It also will build sustainable platforms for discovery and development of antivirals for other viruses with pandemic potential, helping better prepare the nation to face future viral threats.

This plan accelerates and expands the Administration’s ongoing efforts to support clinical trials to test prioritized drug candidates for COVID-19 and to support the advanced development of promising therapies. Working through an unprecedented public-private partnership called ACTIV (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutics and Vaccines), 19 therapeutic agents have been prioritized for testing in rigorous clinical trials for outpatients and inpatients with COVID-19. Having additional FDA-authorized antiviral medicines available within a year would be a major breakthrough in ongoing efforts to combat COVID-19 and protect the public, which is why last week the Administration announced it would procure more than 1.5 million regimens of a Merck investigational antiviral treatment, should it receive emergency use authorization.

Three billion is a lot of money and our work has already established private equity as the mechanism and energy as the sector where in combination, they provide for the conduit to move money relative to the broader political continuum, which consists of paralleling, serving and often reciprocating constructs like Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection” event and impeachment 2.0. Those are only the larger elements and there are multitudes of other aspects like FISA abuse that we omit out of brevity.

BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY – those are President Trump’s markers for all of the fraud, corruption, crime, sedition and treason that currently have him on the outside looking in. Today, we’ll demonstrate how they all fit together in the established generational (contemporaneously, we like to begin the discussion around WWII) and overarching political continuum; and as bound by money and executed in private equity while exploiting the public-private interface. We’ll do this with a reminder that it’s far from a complete picture as previously researched and authored by a single person with only open sources available; and as informed by newly emerged information.

As an example of established work relevant here, what follows is the diagram of the construct for the criminal predicate focusing on the NIAID/Collins/NIH/Fauci cohort, et al as the ENTERPRISE. This is representative of the constructive and compartmentalized elements, processes and entities associated with the broader COVID-19 false flag construct. Relative to our discussion today, it can be excised out and inserted into the second diagram as one of the constructs resting on the overarching political continuum mentioned in our introduction.

Veteran Moonshiners are fully aware of the details associated with that diagram and without an understanding of them, it may be necessary to take an independent sidebar before moving forward. For deeper backdrop relative to the diagram, see this recent recapitulating article. If you’re feeling comfortable with the content and your water is clear, let’s heap a bunch of mud into it and murk it up a bit.

The diagram below requires some front loading followed by back-filling, is complex and there is no easy explanation of it. It is based on existing work (linked below) which consists of 29 articles.

Our primary diagram below begins top left with Chinese doctrine and specifically its infrastructure heavy approach in One Belt, One Road. I recently speculated on how China was going to leverage this doctrine and apply it to the United States with its proxy in Joe Biden and his looming U.S. infrastructure bill.

Digressing, it’s important to identify two primary components to One Belt, One Road – the Communist Chinese Party (CCP) and the CEFC China Energy Company (state-owned); and whereby the former is the political arm and the latter is (was) the economic arm. The obvious third head of the dragon would be the People’s Liberation Army (PLA.)

Opposite China in the top right corner, note the private equity entities of Vanguard and BlackRock and the tie-in to BIG PHARMA. In between and to the informed reader, you’ll see a slate of people, entities, nations and relationships. By means of position, title, appointment, selection, oversight, authority, representation, financial transaction, ownership, agreement or relevant other, we can interweave and connect all of the related entities to China, Vanguard and BlackRock.

That’s important for this reason. I began researching and compiling this article a couple of nights ago and for similar but slightly different reasons.

Mainly, I was focused on reviewing older research (some of which I haven’t compiled into articles) and narrowing in on Big Pharma and campaign contributions and how those elements may factor into the suspected circular flow of money that I was setting out to investigate.

After beginning the work and extending the research, I found an article that delivered the mother lode allowing us to broaden our scope and really deliver a haymaker of a piece that further galvanizes the exclusive positions we’ve been making for so long.

Let’s jump to the end so you can make some contextual sense of it as we go and then we’ll make some Moonshine in between to connect it all.

The piece comes from Dr. Joseph Mercola as published at The Defender and the article is entitled ‘Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess.’

Care to guess? Top right corner – Vanguard and BlackRock.

Finally, here’s the diagram.

In a recently written and monster-sized article that was picked-up and re-posted by Lin Wood and is entitled ‘Follow the Money‘, I deliver the payload for this diagram in terms of energy and private equity. The balance of it was derived mostly from the 29 articles I’ve linked.

A good starting point to understanding it is the $1.5 billion dollar deal that Hunter Biden brokered with the chairman of the CEFC after his dad dropped him off in China after flying over on Air Force 2. Upon landing, Hunter and Joe split ways and when they boarded to depart for stateside, the deal was in Hunter’s pocket right next to his crack pipe and his cell porn device.

We’re latching onto the 2017 timeline as we go.

From the linked article,

It’s this simple. In 2016 and upon exiting office (VPOTUS), Joe (and Jill) Biden’s income was $396,456.

For 2017-2019 and aligning on the same timeline as the deliberate release of a bio-WMD in Wuhan China; and dating back to October 2019 (as per the FBI); and as being first reported in the MSM on 27 Dec 19; the Biden’s income exploded exponentially to $16, 596,979.

Overall, that represents a 4086.34% increase in income for those 3 years combined; equating to an average annual increase in income of $5,532,326.33 at 1295.45%

That change is what we call a hockey stick line statistically and it is a hallmark indicator of fraud, just like these hockey sticks were.

Energy and private equity delivered a rather handsome pay raise for the Bidens. Take note of our 2017 timeline – our hockey stick increase begins then. What else was going on in 2017 – the most important time span in contemporaneous U.S. history?

For a much deeper understanding of this timeline that is imperative for appropriate backdrop, remember what I outlined in Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules. On our rough 2017 timeline, contiguous to it and beginning in 2014, Lisa Monaco at Department of Homeland Security co-issued a memo ordering a “security stand down” at all U.S. bio-containment facilities. I speculated that this was cover to off-shore prohibited gain of function work to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in light of emerging internal whistleblowers. Hold on to this because it will bear down again as we talk more about the 2017 timeline below.

So, yeah… Xoe Xiden’s pay increase comports precisely with all of that -above – as it began in 2017.

The balance of our complex primary diagram above rests on the notion that on a generational timeline, the United States was infiltrated from within by a coalescence of forces ranging from domestic operators to Operation Paperclip and the State Department’s sanctioned immigration of known Nazi war criminals (scientists, etc.) after World War II to more recent and widespread Chinese infiltration of U.S. institutions and critical sectors like education as one of many.

The train really got rolling with George H.W. Bush when relative to his entry into the CIA, the Kennedy assassination and moving forward, he ascended to the presidency to pave the way for everything that would follow and remembering that his grandfather, Prescott Bush, funded the Nazis in World War II.

From GWWB-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Trump-Biden and with Trump being the exception and the only reason we’re likely not already dead under Hillary’s watch, Trump was the anomaly; the outlier; the one who won because it was “unrigged” for him. Each presidency was a passing of the baton to the other; a set-up for the one that would follow hence our generational timeline.

The lion’s share of the work came on Obama’s watch as he “fundamentally change(d)” America. Obama received a 2009 executive order hand-off from George W. Bush that would permit Obama to rewrite U.S. biosecurity rules writ large. This resulted in a “fog of war” like haze respective to them – think cover by ambiguity and philosophy – and under that fog, gain of function work would be halted and off-shored in 2015 and into 2016. It was off-shored to the WIV and it began with the Monaco memo as noted above.

Once the gain of function work was off-shored, Obama was set and primed to move forward on the contiguous 2017 timeline.

Obama inserted the pandemic construct on 13 Jan 17 during compulsory presidential transition meetings. By doing so, he came nearly full circle on an 8-year blueprint.

When Obama came into office in January 2009, he sourced a the U.S. manual on counterinsurgency and mapped it over the U.S. It’s the bible for regime change perfected by decades of intelligence and military work primarily in the Middle East. That was Obama’s blue print. The one he mapped over the U.S. More recently, I revisited the older topic writing one two articles about it.

Obama’s investment into his blueprint application spanned both of his terms, facilitated everything he did and drives all of it right to the point where the rubber meets the road on the 2017 timeline .

From all of that, we gather that the final step to galvanize full control in this broader, generational continuum – the COVID-19 construct – could not be executed until all of the right people were installed in all of the right locations from the federal apparatus right on down to local voting precincts.

Once they were installed and normally in ways that entangled them previously and often years earlier and in abundantly complex fashion, COVID-19 could move forward as obfuscated and ushered in by impeachment 1.0. On an expedited timeline it began 27 Dec 19, I called bullshit then and I’ve been working it since.

Digressing and returning to our diagram.

The balance of the diagram – what lies between China/Xoe Xiden and Vanguard/BlackRock/BIG PHARMA – is the installation of all of those right people in all of those right places as we just laid-out for you briefly and as delivered in excruciatingly detailed in the 29 linked articles and on the website.

Our primary diagram also directly interfaces with earlier research into BIG MEDIA.

With our primary diagram being entirely based upon articles already written all of those details are waiting for you. Here’s a short list of them:

One two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve thirteen fourteen fifteen fifteen sixteen seventeen eighteen nineteen twenty twenty-one twenty-two twenty three twenty-four twenty-five twenty-six twenty-seven twenty-eight twenty-nine.

If your head is swimming, consider listening to the first couple of podcasts (I tried that shoe on for a bit) or taking-in these more recent articles which encapsulate and recapitulate most if not all of the 29 above: ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN. These are from the list of 29 and they won’t give you a full glass, but they’ll help understand the broader scope.

Onward.

I posted our diagram to examine it again before we move forward and hoping it rings a little clearer.

Going ahead, we rely on our Mercola piece from The Defender and all further images are sourced therein – the font in the extracts and the font for the website are similar, so beware.

Recapitulating, we began with the ending, which was BlackRock and Vanguard Group, and then I gave you a cursory level synopsis of the guts of it to get us to that end.

So with that end in hand, we bridge to Mercola with BlackRock and Vanguard Group.

I’ll make only a few notes where it’s appropriate to begin tying it all together because you won’t need them.

Assuming you are familiar with our work on COVID-19 and the political entanglements we have delineated relative to BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY and you’ve plugged-in what’s outlined here, Mercola’s work will fall neatly into place and connect in all of the areas you would expect it to.

I mean, hell, we’re talking BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA under the same precarious-to-find ownership by BIG MONEY and BIG MEDIA is driving the company message or shall we say, force-feeding Kool-Aid elixir to the people. Now, pick up that heaping pile of shit and thrown it squarely into the middle of the D.C. swamp and that’s the status quo. Nice job, America.

Mercola gets right to it – straight nuts and bolts and we get confirmations, connections, relationships and more in spades.

As you process all of the aforementioned and what is about to follow from Mercola, consider the confirmations we recently established in the previous article: 1) early pathogenic studies of SARS-CoV-2, 2) U.S. (and other) modeling of SARS-CoV-2, 3) U.S. funding of gain of function work stateside and in China, 4) involvement of U.S. agencies and organizations writ large, 5) gain of function research (bio-weaponization), 6) compromised U.S. individuals conspiring with China, 7) complicity by U.S. universities and professors, departments, etc., 8) evidence of broader biowarfare programs, 9) Chinese students in America working as “spies” for China, 10) Chinese funding to U.S. individuals in business and government, 11) entanglements in meetings with China and Russia, 12) China’s compromise and killing of intelligence assets working inside China.

Here, we continue riding COVID-19 into the Mercola piece with relevant aspects already highlighted for you (I advise reading the entire article).

TAKING NOTE OF THE ABOVE (!!!) we’ll pause and sympathize because it’s so difficult to wrap ones mind around all of this. I hope my explanations are accurate and helpful. The abundance of overlap in the work from Mercola germane to similar or identical findings from us hopefully helps tie all this together. Unfortunately and as noted by Mercola, there’s just never a good place to start, stop or stay when you’re trying to explain it all AND MAKE SENSE OF IT.

Back to Mercola.

Consider Mercola’s findings and understand that some of his missing pieces are essentially represented in the 29 articles I linked while his work mirrors some of our findings; while also giving us confirmations on older positions; and while also presenting new ones. What’s not in those articles you can likely find in the other 170 others on the website – we’ve covered substantial ground.

In essence and in light of the full catalog of Moonshine work relative to COVID-19, it allows us to stand at near full circle as it relates to having an accurate and detailed broader understanding of the who, what when where why and how of the status quo.

Perhaps this is the best summary conclusion for this article.

Let’s think about everything that has been outlined and then consider how I got to this very moment in time; to write this article and establish all of these connections through private equity.

I WAS EXAMINING THE BACKGROUNDS OF THEN ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR AND NOW FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER WRAY and I latched onto their resume timelines and their law firms in private practice further inspecting for conflicts of interest, political entanglements, etc. Identifying private equity trails, we moved to the present and here we are – standing full circle but acknowledging holes in the perimeter that need filling with additional work.

Or, perhaps this is the best one and as I said before, hell, we’re talking BIG PHARMA and BIG MEDIA under the same precarious-to-find ownership by BIG MONEY and BIG MEDIA is driving the company message or shall we say, force-feeding Kool-Aid elixir to the people. Now, pick up that heaping pile of shit and thrown it squarely into the middle of the D.C. swamp.

Is it even worth looking at the original intent here? Remember what it was? Determining whether there is a circular flow of money relative to campaign donations from BIG PHARMA.

What do you think?

Oh yeah, Bill Barr is worth $40-$74 million.

And Wray? $23-$40 million circa 2017.

You tell me.

Until next time, Godspeed.

-End-

Undo COVID-19 by Pressing the Predication ‘Easy Button’

An unfortunate and persistent feature of contemporary society and one that is particularly prominent in younger generations of Americans, is the short attention span. It’s a precariously dangerous dynamic wherein the next “shiny object” is always only moments away, always already queued up by the string pullers enshrouded in darkness and operating in the backdrop, and always with the capacity to move the masses in particular and desired directions. It matters not if you brand it the ‘herding of the sheep’, the ‘social programming’ of the proletariat or any other appropriate and applicable label. Rather, what matters is that it is tested, tried and true; unless of course, you’re keen on sipping the Moonshine.

An unfortunate and persistent outcome of the short attention span dynamic is the production and maintenance of what I call the feeble American mind, which often gets penned descriptively as ‘feeble minded Amerikans.’ Therein, ones own sense of learned helplessness can bear down with full might to drive a perpetual cycle of institutional preservation that keeps the sheep in their flock and the shepherds posted-up and minding them: Kennedy assassination, Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, 9/11, Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, a stolen 2020 election, the Capitol “insurrection”, impeachment 2.0, the installation of a Chinese proxy in Joe Biden, and the balance of this open-ended string of events. That is, unless, the forces of good eventually prevail in devastating form and soon.

Nothing is as frustrating as the one who is as intelligent as he is ignorant; ignorant of the correct details, that is. Those people occur voluminously, trend virtuously and without question, they and their blind faith in “authority” are leading their own kind and others to enslavement at best and slaughter at worst. They do it out of things like ‘systemic racism’, ‘climate change’, ‘orange man bad’ and a bunch of other literal fabricated and sown narrative constructs devised to perpetuate their own helplessness; and they are oblivious to it.

Are these positions too extreme to accurately characterize contemporary Americans and the status quo? Care to play devil’s advocate?

Consider that on 26 Aug 20, the CDC issued a press release revising away 94% of the bulk data used to justify and rationalize all of the federal guidelines and mitigations that devastated the nation, its people, its society and its economy. In layman’s terms, the CDC had retracted a months-long lie making it disappear with one swipe of the pen. Therein, 94% of the data they used was rendered fabricated and invalid. It was and continues to be demonstrable fraud. I couldn’t believe they actually released this data point but what I failed to consider is the power of the feeble Amerikan mind.

This was like catching fish in a barrel, I thought. The pandemic is over, I thought. The toothpaste is going back into the tube, I thought. I even wrote this article about it.

But what did Americans do after receiving this fortuitous news on 26 Aug 20 that was hardly reported? Not a God damned thing. Nope, rather they continued to act afraid. They continued consuming the wrong news and information. They continued wearing their masks and forcing them on their children. They continued following all of the pretend, made-up and flip-flopping rules until they were out of school, out of work and their businesses shuttered forever; like the sheep I’ve painted them to be.

What did Americans do on 12 May 21 and were they even aware of more troubling statistical developments from the CDC? Do Americans even know what even happened on that day?

On 12 May 21 and almost a year after the first gross revision, the CDC exacerbated the situation by issuing further notice that of all the bulk data it used to justify and rationalize mitigations and guidelines, only 5% now remained valid while 95% of the data were invalid and leveraged an average of 4.0 underlying co-morbidities.

In other words, the COVID-19 pandemic is only 5% valid and 95% invalid. I’ve covered about every granular aspect of how this occurred since roughly 27 Dec 19 – the first public report of the outbreak. Do you know what happens when you apply these percentages to the metrics the CDC was publishing?

It situates the entire COVID-19 pandemic squarely in the middle of regular seasonal flu as I’ve demonstrated over and over and over and over. Here’s a visual sample and following it we’ll pick back up.

I even wrote another article on it that very day.

What did Americans do after not one notice of demonstrable fraud, but two notices, and with a year in between to think about it and perhaps even challenge their own conventions to formulate a plan to redress it?

What did they do? Not a God damned thing.

Don’t lose hope, though, because we don’t effectively need all Americans on board the truth train – just enough of them to cross a threshold. Fortunately for us and in light of a mountain of evidence supporting our positions, we appear to be nearing that threshold if we’re not already there. This sums up the notion perfectly and hilariously and it gives us hope.

So then, what is the path forward? How do we redress the status quo and return an historically elected president to his rightful second term; and how do we do that before the Biden fraud train gets too far from the station to be returned? Is there an “easy button”?

It all starts with a walk backwards in time and a review of our timeline for the finer details. Therein, I’ll provide us with the “easy button” to push to end a pandemic that leverages a real bio-weaponized virus in the propagation of abundantly and demonstrably fraudulent data harvested and curated from underlying co-morbidities.

The “easy button” is something we call predication and it can be properly situated and properly removed. In the case of COVID-19, the predication was situated with patently fraudulent data and sown narrative and it can be removed by establishing verifiable fact sets that undermine these aspects. Establishing those fact sets is our mission today and we use timeline overlays to do it.

Timeline overlays make for formidable weapons devised at fleshing-out the truth. I began compiling a rudimentary and incomplete timeline years ago and it continues to serve us well. We’ll use it to understand the magnitude of a vital date in March 2020 and it’s something that no one ever talks about except for Moonshiners.

Importantly, understand that we are omitting most of the finer details here to make this conversation expedient and therefore, any missing gaps can be filled in by visiting the website and hunting them down. We move forward with meat and potatoes only.

As I previously reported, in late 2014, Lisa Monaco, who was then at Department of Homeland Security, co-issued a national security stand down at all U.S. bio-containment facilities that served as the false flag impetus to ensnare all U.S. gain of function work (bioweaponization) for the express purpose of off-shoring it to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. This occurred against the backdrop of internal U.S. whistleblowers shining a light on the controversial and prohibited work. The off-shoring of the work is also reflected below relative to U.S. funding of it, which followed as per then President Barack Obama and Anthony Fauci. Our recent work details the role of Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance relative to that funding. We’ll begin our timeline review there.

Consider how all of this unfolds sequentially and like I said, see how timeline overlays are formidable weapons; especially as it relates to those with short attention spans.

Why did Obama make changes to longstanding presidential transition law with roots drawing back to the Kennedy assassination in 1963? Why did Obama change these compulsory laws to augment them to guarantee the inclusion of pandemic preparedness? Why did Obama make that change unilaterally with an executive order (Public Law 113-146)?

Why did Obama increase funding to the WHO, which is funded and controlled by China, Bill Gates and others and why did he do this at the same time he decreased funding at our own CDC? Why did Obama cut CDC funding at the same time he wittingly left our cupboards bare of masks and ventilators? Was Obama clandestinely working to promote a planned pandemic or working to prevent an unseen one? Rhetorical questions.

Why would Biden establish needed pretext by rearing his head in peculiar pre-COVID-19 fashion to publicly go on record claiming that the U.S. was ill-prepared for a pandemic crisis? Why would Obama circle back to it post-presidency to chastise President Trump over it? Didn’t Obama and Biden just finish eight years in office whereby they could have diligently ensured that America was supremely prepared for any sort of prognosticated pandemic event and therefore be positioned to hand that off to the next incoming president? Isn’t that how it’s supposed to work and in the best interest of the American people?

If pandemic preparedness was so critical to national security, why did Obama and Biden leave America so woefully and inadequately prepared as they exited office? Isn’t that hypocritical and antithetical to common sense? Don’t Obama and Biden bear the culpability for any level of U.S. unpreparedness circa 2017 and forward? After all, they had 8 years and Trump was just warming up his seat. All rhetorical questions and all of it serving a known fraudulent construct.

Why did Anthony Fauci issue one of several pre-COVID-19 pandemic preparedness warnings just two days before the compulsory 13 Jan 17 transition meetings as augmented by Obama’s unilateral decree to include a pandemic preparedness exercise? Why did Obama’s White House coordinate the MSM release of the patently fraudulent Flynn/Russia narrative to preempt the meetings and deflect away from the newly minted pandemic concerns and why did this all overlap the need to renew expiring FISA warrants on Carter Page, which were extended despite being known to be improperly (illegally) predicated (there’s our word again but in a different context)?

Why was all of this going on at the same time and at the precise moment President Trump was executing Phase I of the bilateral trade deal with China – the hostile foreign nation that started an irregular, asymmetrical and undeclared third world war with its release of a bio-WMD? No one talks about this timeline but we Moonshiners. Everything you value and hold dear can now be drawn back to these exact moments.

Continuing with 2017.

Leaving off at 31 Jan 17, let’s insert a few items for your consideration before picking back up with 2019 below. Consider these.

How could the U.S. and other (allied?) nations be purchasing “COVID” specific supplies and materials as early as 2017 (the most important timeline in contemporary U.S. history) when “COVID” was not created as the applicable name until 11 Feb 20?

We pick back up at 2019.

Why is all of the aforementioned occurring as an overlay to the smuggling of SARS-CoV-2 strains to the WIV via dirty Harvard University professor Charles Lieber and his slate of Chinese foreign nationals who were conveniently Harvard students? Why was Nancy Pelosi recklessly mismanaging her unfounded impeachment at this precise moment? All rhetorical questions. Impeachment served as the deflection mechanism for the ushering in of COVID-19 and no one else has told you that except for Political Moonshine and we did so about a year and a half ago.

Why was Fauci – the so-called expert who we can now say with absolute and 100% certainty was directly involved with and funding gain of function research relative to this exact SARS-CoV-2 virus – issuing dire predictions that stood antithetical to his stand down, which advised that travel restrictions weren’t needed and that Americans shouldn’t be concerned at all? The only expert to issue advice like that is a corrupt, treasonous, criminal and murdering one devising for the propagation of a pandemic he had constructed and would manage. Otherwise the details are just fodder for idiots trying to find their mask and their 6 ft. measuring stick.

Here is where we begin to delineate the “easy button” strategy to undoing the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic and we do so resting on the notion that fraudulent constructs are just that – constructed. In statecraft, they are generally constructed by means of legislation or law ergo, by reversing course on the granular components that permit such construction, we can effectively deconstruct it. In order to do that, we have to rip out and destroy the predication.

For the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic, the predication is comprised of the fact sets underpinning the need for a declaration of a national emergency. As noted, the declaration is rooted in and affected by legislation. Extracted from our April 2020 article,

Translated, the Fauci cohort technically usurped President Trump’s emergency powers when then President Trump declared a national emergency relative to COIVD-19. This compelled Trump to defer to them in the effort to steer the U.S. through its pandemic response. Therefore, in order to secure those powers back, the predication for the national emergency must be destroyed and the declaration rescinded.

With that last sentence in mind, finding a cogent explanation for how and why manipulated data became the driver for the fraudulent pandemic is easy. It also fully explains why in Spring 2020, they dragged us through the seasonal die-off of flu/pneumo with the mid-April shift from mortality data, which was in decline at the time, to “infection data,” which had never been done before – EVER. They’re doing the same now in spring 2021 with “variants” fear porn.

What is the predication for the national emergency? In short, we can say that the predication was based upon a new and apparently highly virulent virus about which there was little to no knowledge and for which there are no known treatments (cures). Obviously and by now, it’s known that both points are fabricated narrative that are patently demonstrable as lies.

Moreover, the Fauci cohort ignored natural herd immunity and set the standard for recovery as the widespread inoculation of the masses with experimental mRNA “vaccine” technology unapproved by the FDA for use outside of the “emergency” designation. This means that if the predication for the national emergency is removed relative to the pandemic, then the predication for the authorization of experimental vaccines is also removed. Without one there is not the other.

What is the predication for the emergency designation? In part, it’s that there are no known cures to the disease. Enter Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, which are both known and effective treatments for SARS-CoV-2. The latter has been safely in use all over the world for over 60 years and the Fauci and MSM cohort obliterated then President Trump for recommending it as an effective remedy; instead driving the mRNA vaccination objectives. There was a very specific reason Hydroxychloroquine (and Trump) was attacked the way it was and it’s obvious. With effective treatments immediately made available in late 2019 or early 2020, the pandemic would never have gotten out of its criminally fraudulent starting blocks.

Here’s how to press the “easy button” to undo COVID-19 and return to normal. Importantly, though, everyone must realize that in actuality, there is nothing easy about this and “easy” is only offered in colloquial terms for the sake of the conversation.

A narrow spectrum of effective treatments to COVID-19 including Ivermectin and Hydroxycholoroquine effectively remove the predication for experimental mRNA vaccinations, which were set as the standard exit from the pandemic. These effective treatments in combination with statistically accurate attributions for mortality and infection data; and remembering that only 5% of that data remains valid, return all pandemic infection and mortality rates to the range of conventional seasonal flu season. We don’t issue national emergency declarations for conventional, typical flu seasons.

The net effect of this eviscerates the entire predication for the declaration of a national emergency: 1) the infection and mortality data are otherwise standard, 2) effective treatments are widely available and, thanks to an ultimately high order maneuver by President Trump, 3) a slate of vaccination options exist. Importantly, it also creates the impetus to rescind the emergency declaration and immediately so.

For a quick sidebar, this hallmark successes completely overturned their apple cart causing them to regroup and once again, revise their plan and timeline in responsive fashion. I suspect that they intended on leveraging the conventional years-long vaccine R&D timeline to extend the construct for its original intent – a control mechanism.

Once the national emergency declaration is rescinded, the emergency authorization for the apparently dangerous and deadly experimental mRNA vaccinations also disappears. It would immediately make it impermissible to administer those vaccines because there is no authorization beyond the emergency designation. This would compel vaccine manufacturers to then align with conventional timelines for research, development, testing and delivery and that assumes they’re even needed to begin with, which they are not. Importantly, this would immediately put to rest vaccination mandates by places of work, schools, etc.

Combined with effective treatments, the rescinded national emergency declaration would also eliminate the predication for the CDC to issue pandemic guidelines and mitigations. Therefore, the authority that predicates and underpins gubernatorial enforcement of mitigations and guidelines at the state level (federalism bears down here) is removed as governors would be precluded from acting outside of the explicit language found in each respective state constitution. No emergency declaration, no emergency powers, no emergency experimental vaccines and no mitigations or guidelines or enforcement thereof. Everyone do as you please as God intended.

All of it is undone by removing the predication for the emergency declaration and the evidence validating rescinding it exists in spades.

Americans have short attention spans but timeline overlays can overcome this unfortunate dynamic for anyone willing to examine reliable information and data. If they further care to take action from that position, it would begin with ripping away the predication for all of it and beginning with the March 2020 national emergency declaration that serves as the only card holding up and entire house constructed of fraudulently fabricated cards.

Assuming President Trump returns to office in August as the evidence is now suggesting, his first order of business should be pressing the “easy button” and ripping away the predication for the single greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people and the global population.

From there, we’ll eat popcorn and enjoy the show.

-End-

Daszak Delivered Damning Details in 2016

The Moonshine catalog of work relative to COVID-19 is unmatched and in important ways, exclusive in the positions it rests on and evidences. In all of that, a particular premise that underpins the broader position is the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was bio-engineered or bio-weaponized. In the pursuit to support our postulation with verifiable evidence, we latched on to very early epidemiological findings that were indicative of genetic markers in the SARS-CoV-2 strain that demonstrated it contained artificial HIV insertions.

It is critical to understand that the artificial HIV insertions represent the precise bio-engineering needed to permit SARS-CoV-2 to transmit and become virulent as it did and that without the HIV insertions, the SARS-CoV-2 virus is incapable of performing accordingly as occurring naturally and outside of a laboratory setting. That type of bio-engineering (bio-weaponizing) is called gain of function and it’s the precise research book-ended by the U.S. and China and with Anthony Fauci, the NIH/NIAID, U.S. funding, Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance all inconveniently ensnared in between.

More recently, we revisited this epidemiological work to verify recent updates to it including the genetic evidence of a confirmed 6 artificial HIV insertions in SARS-CoV-2. With absolute confidence and in short, there is a 0% chance that SARS-CoV-2 was NOT bioweaponized because the genetic evidence, which is understood to be entirely reliable and is admissible in a court of law, is irrefutably contained within the viral strain itself. It’s a closed circle and a closed case for gain of function research relative to SARS-CoV-2.

What remains is hashing out culpability and if you’ve been drinking your Moonshine, you know that President Trump compartmentalized the culpability for the COVID-19 political construct entirely with the Fauci/Pench cohort during a legendary April 2020 press conference I’ve rehashed countless times in myriad articles and videos.

For the sake of fidelity in our discussion today, a foundation of recent work should be consumed to understood what underpins our evidence and our purpose here today, which is to take in a short video featured in a Natalie Winters item at The National Pulse. That foundation includes the links contained both above and below.

In both granular detail and in a more layman approach, while also further pinning culpability specifically on the Wuhan Institute of Virology, I’ve recently outlined the status quo as the U.S. being situated in an irregular, asymmetrical and undeclared third world war formally commenced with the release of a Chinese bio-WMD. In two parts and falling back on a third November 2020 article that addresses the beginning of Fauci’s pivot out of COVID-19, we discussed a general general carve-out in the broader narrative for the COVID exit along with a specific carve-out being constructed for Fauci’s exit, which is expected to take the form of a controversial retirement or resignation; my money being on the former.

Additional recent work building on our foundation and adding to the dialogue includes a deep and wide look at how the energy sector was/is serving as the conduit to move money internationally and the further emergence of gain of function research enmeshing Fauci and the WIV relative to research and funding, which holds Fauci like quicksand and keeps him from escaping deserved scrutiny.

Another weighty article that should be consumed and understood and which caught the eye of Lin Wood, who reposted it on Telegram and has been sipping the Moonshine ever since details the evidenced history of Fauci, Barack Obama and then Lisa Monaco’s Department of Homeland Security as gain of function research was off-shored to China following the emergence of internal U.S. whistleblowers. This occurred on a 2015-2016 timeline and is contiguous to our broader timeline here.

Relative to our timeline, don’t forget about this email referencing a meeting in which Joe Biden participated.

Another important piece includes one that further ensnares Fauci and drags the premier U.S. bio-containment facility, or shall we say bio-weaponization facility – Ft. Dietrick (Maryland) – to the front and center taking recently emerged evidence and linking it all of the way back to the entirety of the Moonshine catalog of COVID work that began in earnest in late December of 2019 and just days after the 27 Dec 19 first report of the outbreak in Wuhan.

The rubber is about to meet the road but another article details the free fall of #FalseFlagFauci and hashes-out the recently released tranche of Fauci emails. It contains this email below and the subsequent remarks about it relative to Fauci; Peter Daszak, who is the topic of the Winters video; EcoHealth Alliance, which is Dasazk’s outfit and which served as an intermediary conduit (again, the public-private interface and as it was leveraged with U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine) to funnel money to the WIV for off-shored gain of function research. In this particular instance, the email details a collective position to advise the MSM of a fraudulent COVID-19 narrative to drive the construct.

This emails is significant for a spectrum of critical reasons:

  • Fauci and another are represented as conspiring to deliver a known fraudulent narrative via the MSM
  • This overlaps the precise mid-April 2020 shift when the CDC/WHO cohort moved the conventionally accepted pandemic measurement – mortality data – which was in decline at that time, to infection data, or “new case data” and so as to drag the pandemic through the seasonal die-off of the co-morbidities being statistically leveraged and right back to peak-flu of 2020-2021, which the CDC begins every December 1st
  • Fauci is shown crafting the narrative to comport with the forthcoming anticipated explosion of cases as constructively delivered by deliberately faulty PCR testing that the Democrats began calling for dating back to January 2020
  • It is relative to the legendary April 2020 news conference that I mention often and for which it seems most people missed the most important angle whereby President Trump dragged Fauci back to the podium and forced him to correct his own record and in so doing, Trump compartmentalized all of the COVID-19 matter entirely within the Fauci/Pence cohort (pandemic response team), which effectively usurped the President’s emergency powers with the 11 Mar 20 declaration of a national emergency.

With all of this on the table and underpinning the Winters video, let’s get to it.

In the video, which is linked in Winter’s article at The National Pulse, you’ll hear Daszak remark voluntarily and devastatingly – to his and Fauci’s case – as he describes gain of function work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology dating back to 2016 and relative to our timeline above.

From Winters,

Daszak made the admission at a 2016 forum discussing “emerging infectious diseases and the next pandemic,” which appears to be at odds with Fauci’s repeated denial of funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

While describing how his organization sequences deadly viruses, Daszak describes the process of “insert[ing] spike proteins” into viruses to see if they can “bind to human cells” as being carried out by his “colleagues in China”:

“Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we… Well I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people. 

“You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers,” he adds.

In Daszak’s own words,

Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance

https://politicalmoonshine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/fauci-funded-daszak-describes-apos-colleagues-in-china-apos-manipulating-viruses-into-apos-killers-apos-y2matez.com_.mp4

That was in 2016 and only months before the most important timeline in contemporary U.S. history. The carve-out for the COVID exit is in play. The carve-out for Fauci’s exit is in play. I branded him #FalseFlagFauci a long, long time ago and since then, the evidence has only stacked-up in our favor, to his detriment and copiously.

It’s only a matter of time.

-End-

Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine: A Closer Look at the Guide

In this article, we’re taking a closer look at the U.S. Counterinsurgency Guide 2009-2017 and with the understanding that it’s imperative to read the first article for appropriate contextual backdrop. That article recapitulates an older established position featured in an April 2020 article I wrote and then reinforces those positions with evidence from a more recent item sourced from Zero Hedge and cited to We Meant Well. That brief article itself is worthy of full consumption; especially given the granular supporting details I omitted from it to save space and time.

The article examines how a newly inaugurated and first-term President Barack Obama entered office in January 2009 and immediately began to apply and map-over the U.S. (and its people) its own counterinsurgency doctrine that was perfected overseas in decades worth of CIA operations conducted to dictate “election” outcomes in other nations.

FEDERALISM

A quick sidebar on federalism because federalism functions both as a mechanism and a network in this broader generational continuum. Look at it as layered one over the other: U.S. populace, application of federalism, elected representatives and officials in federal government.

The purveyors of fraud and treason atop the federal apparatus network down through the natural nexuses that intimately and intricately connect the federal apparatus to states, counties and localities. Therein the network of friendlies, which is accomplished by infiltrating as far and wide as possible the local levels of the network and moving upward where it manifests in mostly blue states. That network permits the natural interface for legislation and law; including the issuance of federal CDC guidelines, to flow through it and whereby decisions start with state governors. This is the essence of federalism and it was co-opted and leveraged back against us.

Federalism is precisely how the entire U.S. can be (was) overthrown – by co-opting only a handful of states. It’s why states have appeared and functioned differently and uniquely all throughout the fraudulent pandemic. It’s a full, precise and exact explanation for how you can steal an entire 2020 election by co-opting a relative handful of precincts.

The layer in between – federalism – which provided the network and the legal bridge for federal authority to bear down locally in light of acquiescing governors – was interfaced with the doctrines of U.S. counterinsurgency. Therein those counterinsurgency principals and tactics were applied to the populace through this network. The are other interfaces that will also be noted below.

Here are the maps of which states are playing ball and again, note the redundant overlaps in locations through different times and contexts.

A CLOSER LOOK

Let’s take a closer look at the actual U.S. Counterinsurgency Guide 2009-2017 by honing in on the actual document.

We’ll start begin with the author of the Preface, Eliot A. Cohen. Here’s what we know about Cohen.

We have an established common thread in Johns Hopkins University as much as there is a common time marker relative to personnel and comporting on a rough January 2009 timeline; otherwise extending to President Barack Obama’s 1st term.

Cohen threads through Condoleeza Rice, the Department of State and Harvard University, which is another redundant overlap. He entered State in 2007 and exited with George W. Bush in 2009. A long-tenured D.C. swamp inhabitant with a diverse professional background in all of the right areas, Cohen in 2019 was named Dean of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins. This comports on the COVID-19 construct timeline and rests firmly on another critical element in all of this – the public-private interface, which often take the from of NGOs, which we have discussed countless times.

More specifically and resting on the public-private interface, consider how Cohen’s appointment as noted above might be beneficial to the very same Johns Hopkins that was conducting a trial run; a litmus test; a kick of the tires; a shaking out of the bugs; for a viral pandemic scenario as occurring right before the “pandemic” and it was called Event 201. It took place in October 2019 some two months before the first MSM report of a viral outbreak in Wuhan China on 27 Dec 19.

Might Cohen serve well in a Johns Hopkins capacity; especially since he wrote the forward for the guide containing the doctrine upon which the entire Event 201 exercise rests and will ultimately function when set upon the U.S. and the rest of the world? Maybe? Asking for a friend.

The same entities – Johns Hopkins, here – and time markers keep coalescing and repeating over and over and over and over. Is it due to coincidence and circumstance or is it a reflection of the nebulous network of RICO statute violators committing the greatest fraud and treason we could have imagined? Rhetorical question; it’s the latter and all of the evidences supports it.

Is it surprising that at Johns Hopkins it’s the BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH? The same Michael Bloomberg threading right through all of this and right to rotten to the very rotten core? Starting to see how none of this can be accidental, coincidental or circumstance and that conspiracy is exactly what it isn’t?

The forward is short and revealing so it’s reproduced in full.

Here is a list of extracts from Cohen’s Preface. Ask yourself if these sound familiar with the status quo as I have already explained it and as it has manifested around you. I’ve also added relevant commentary to explain the particulars.

Remember, federalism bears down as both the network and the mechanism to make all of this happen.

  • Prolonged counterinsurgency campaigns: Perfected in the Middle East and elsewhere this doctrine was applied to leverage federalism as the mechanism for overthrow
  • Supported friendly governments facing internal subversion: Translates to engaging with local, county and state entities of a like mind
  • Best contemporary thought, historical knowledge and hard-won practice: Obama co-opted the U.S.’ best work to ensure reliability in leveraging back against us be the circumstance demand it – do or die as per the rule of law (assuming it is eventually enforced)
  • Best kind of doctrinal work: (see above)
  • Irregular warfare that is varied: Talk to people young and old and ask them to recall a time like the present and they can’t hence the effectiveness of irregular warfare including propaganda, misinformation, disinformation, asymmetrical approaches, infiltration, subversion, insurgency, counterinsurgency and more – all designed to bring about a fog devised to enshroud truth and reality
  • Intellectual framework coherent enough to provide guidance: Consider how the infiltration at the university level impacts everything right down to the local school board level and then consider other similar interfaces throughout the entirety of the “friendlies” network as described above
  • Adaptable to circumstances: Consider how a cohort of good “un-rigged” the 2016 election permitting President Trump to legitimately win and how that overarching construct resting on a generational timeline was augmented and revised to adapt to the status quo, which caused an acceleration in the COVID construct as a mechanism to deliver the election, remove Trump and return to operations now on an expedited timeline so as to recapture all that was lost over the previous four years
  • Demand on bureaucracies working together: This is what the Deep State and Democrats do best; co-opt bureaucracies to conduct fraud in execution of their corruption and crimes
  • Allies and NGOs: As noted here and often, the public-private interface is the primary portal for bad actors to bear down on citizen populations to deliver state-sponsored edicts and the non-governmental organization is often the shell entity permitting it
  • Interface of State, Defense, US Agency for International Development: This is redundant co-opting of necessary and beneficial entities within the federal apparatus and otherwise
  • Superior knowledge in the “human terrain”: Everything we’ve seen from the fraudulent pandemic construct to the propagation of its fraudulent data to the fraudulent and stolen election has been the application and execution of psychological warfare doctrine and tactics as perfected within the context of counterinsurgency
  • Using field innovations to knit together lines (to the top): This translates to the ground-up networking approach rooted in infiltration and beginning locally
  • Emphasis on policy as a mechanism: Consider that leveraging the federal bureaucracy to leverage policy means compromising policymakers and one example of many is the Swalwell/HPSCI/Chinese spy scenario
  • Remarkable field innovations: Insurance by using the best tried and true methodologies
  • PRTs bringing together civilian and military personnel: This translates to bringing together local, county and state entities with federal entities by leveraging federalism
  • Insurgency as growing security challenge: This is indicative of the weaknesses identified that were eventually positioned for exploitation towards the objective
  • Weak state structures: This translates to infiltration efforts that delivered acquiescing governors relative to COVID-19, the riots and the stolen election
  • Demographic pressures: This includes “white nationalism” and “systemic racism” campaigns and the series of riots 2020-2021
  • Environmental pressures: This includes last summer’s fires and the relentless false “climate change narrative”
  • Economic pressures: Consider all of the economic devastation delivered by COVID-19
  • Ease of cooperation between insurgent groups and criminals: This translates to the existing and emerging networks for Antifa, BLM and relevant others
  • Appearance of destructive ideologies: This includes projecting Nazism onto Trump supporters, the false “systemic racism” narrative, the false “white nationalism,” narrative, the false “white males” narrative, the false “gun violence” narrative and all of the false flag shootings that go with it and more

Cohen tells us, “This guide provides that.”

ANY OTHER VIABLE EXPLANATION?

Now look around you and consider everything I’ve tediously, ardently, meticulously and copiously outlined here and in hundreds of articles and videos and thousands of social media posts. Consider whether or not the status quo can be explained fully and accurately any other way.

It can’t. Not for my nickel and furthermore and to the contrary, I can prove it in the other direction.

The truth rests on evidence. The truth is the truth and it stands alone and the truth is that beginning in January 2009, President Obama began to apply the U.S. Counterinsurgency doctrine against the nation and its people.

It eventually led to a stolen election and the installation of a Chinese proxy in Joe Biden and here we are.

-End-

Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine and the COVID-19 Blueprint to Overthrow America

On 30 Apr 20, I authored a piece examining how a newly inaugurated and first-term President Barack Obama entered office in January 2009 and immediately began to apply and map-over the U.S. (and its people) its own intelligence doctrine and methods (counterinsurgency) that were perfected overseas in decades worth of CIA operations conducted to dictate “election” outcomes in other nations. I’m sure many (most) who saw it chalked it up to more “conspiracy theory” and dismissed it altogether thinking that COVID-19 was legitimate and despite the Moonshine effort demonstrating it as entirely fraudulent. Therein, things like the CIA, Director John O. Brennan, Hammer and Scorecard, and Art Project and Architecture all bear down and draw us close to things like Obama, China, the CCP, the PLA, the Bidens, Dominion, Smartmatic, the stolen 2020 U.S. election, Bill Barr, Christopher Wray, U.S. lawmakers, U.S. officials, CEOs, the MSM and a bunch more.

Today, we’re going to tie it all together to continue moving forward in a broader case that we make more water-tight with each passing day. We’ll then put to rest any further notion of “conspiracy theory.”

OBAMA HITS THE GROUND RUNNING TO “FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE” AMERICA

Upon entering office in January 2009 and in addition to the application of U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine to America and its people, what else did Obama do immediately as a “first” and relative to the underlying broader political continuum; to the two-term administration he was being installed to run; and to the “fundamental” changes (overthrow) he promised to usher-in as a set stage for the final act, which would have eliminated the Constitution and the Republic in favor of a Marxism, socialism and communism in Hillary Clinton.

Again, it’s not by coincidence, accident or circumstance that the U.S. biosecurity rules rewrite began under Bill Clinton, bore down will full might during the 9/11 aftermath, were handed-off to Obama in a GW Bush executive order and were devised to come to full force under Hillary Clinton beginning in January 2017; if not for the election being “un-rigged” for a legitimate Trump victory – the first and actual legitimate electoral victory in decades. I believe it to be the late John McCain who quipped that it would be foolish to allow Americans to select their own leaders.

As one example, Obama made the eventual Chinese proxy and Vice President Joe Biden his first and “most important” cabinet appointment. For another, Obama also began an immediate rewrite of biosecurity rules in all U.S. national biocontainment facilities that was permitted by an executive order executed by outgoing George W. Bush just eleven days before his exit from office. Importantly, this permits the overarching construct to transit presidential administrations, which is a mechanism to provide cover and compartmentalize culpability while also making the crimes harder to identify and more difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Also take note of the evidenced congressional treason entrenched throughout all of this and do so understanding that the spine to the overarching and generational political continuum is the intelligence community. That manifests heavily with the the HPSCI and SSCI and the cast of characters (the ususal suspects) who occupy those committees or who have ex officio status membership to them.

As an example of the latter, the intelligence community was privy to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in October 2019 and had evidence that the U.S. was smuggling strains of the virus to China via Harvard University professor Charles Lieber. This was all provided in an FBI tactical intelligence report. Nancy Pelosi is an ex officio member of the HPSCI and was therefore privy to this intelligence. You can say the same for Mitch McConnell and the SSCI. What was Pelosi doing at the time? She was driving the first of two fraudulent impeachment constructs with the objective of transmitting the Articles of Impeachment before Christmas (25 Dec); getting it done by the 18th and whereby the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was first reported in the MSM two days after Christmas on 27 Dec 19.

Therefore, the entire time she cracked the impeachment whip, Pelosi was aware of the viral outbreak. No one else but Moonshine has told you that the primary purpose of the first impeachment construct served to deflect from and usher-in COVID-19 and we told you that over a year ago on 25 Mar 20.

The timing of Pelosi’s tenure as Speaker is important – think of all of the committees we have discussed along with the investigative and subpoena power possessed and leveraged by each. Pelosi is most certainly compromised – maybe even in writing – and most certainly by China and therefore she, like Biden, functions as a proxy in the sense that if House leadership is compromised, said compromise extends to everything under control of leadership. If abused, the House committees become the teeth in the dog.

Pelosi’s deliberate placement as Speaker on each end of the rope – both Obama’s and Biden’s entry into office – serves to ensure proper handling of House authority for the Deep State. There is little doubt that Republicans John Boehner and Paul Ryan, respectively, fulfilled their obligations in bridging the gap back to Pelosi (for Biden) and the status quo. One does not get to be Speaker unless it is guaranteed with fidelity that one will serve as required. Think fealty for all of them.

At this same general time, President Obama also dispatched his Vice President Joe Biden to travel the globe brokering one private equite energy deal after another; the same can be said for Biden’s initiative to strike new relations with a host of nations in the areas of energy and natural gas. It’s imperative to understand that in this light, I’ve established a working and evidenced position that the global energy sector is/was being used as a primary conduit to move money in private equity deals and many of the locations overlap vaccine research in other nations and that overlaps the Bidens specifically.

Everything we discuss today should also be consumed relative to the established Moonshine position on the status quo and in short, it’s that the U.S. finds itself situated in an irregular, undeclared and asymmetrical third world war that was formally commenced in October 2019 when China released a bio-WMD on the U.S. and the rest of the world; and from that, leverages an installed Chinese proxy in Joe Biden and his administration.

The evidence on Hunter Biden’s laptop suggests that China’s viral construct was called “Art Project,” it was complimented by Architecture and that both derive from China’s One Belt One Road doctrine, which leverages energy and infrastructure as the interfaces to apply Chinese doctrine to globally affect change and broker financial deals. The looming U.S. infrastructure bears down here on the former.

EVIDENCE OF THE APPLICATION OF U.S. COUNTERINSURGENCY DOCTRINE

Holding our attention and serving as the context for our discussion is a brief article featured at Zero Hedge and sourced at WeMeantWell.com and from it, we’ll pull extracts to provide associated the tiebacks. Underpinning our conversation and as noted above is my original article, which frames the application of U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine relative to Saul Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’, Obama’s oratory prowess as an effective tool to foment “fundamental change” and, something no one else has contextually established the way we have – that federalism (separation state/county/local and federal authority) serves as the primary mechanism to divide the nation and its people one state, one county and one city at a time; just like the CIA did for decades in the Middle East. If you’ve been drinking your Moonshine, you’ve been far ahead in the information game by well over a year.

Importantly, that article also described how America is supremely ripe for overthrow and that the mechanism to facilitate it was infiltration from within; hearkening back to then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s words of warning to state governors and universities last summer when he essentially placed them all on notice relative to Chinese influence and infiltration.

America being ripe can’t be overlooked because it speaks directly to six things: 1) the effectiveness of hostile foreign nations (primarily China) in infiltrating the U.S. and its institutions on a generational timeline, 2) how that aligns with Chinese war doctrine, 3) the effectiveness of the propaganda those hostile nations (China) were able to sow into the MSM narrative for public consumption, 4) the effectiveness of the (Chinese) propaganda to move a large swath of the populace away from traditional American principles so as to effectively divide the country by leveraging “systemic racism“, 5) the effectiveness of the propaganda leveraging reliable Nazi era constructs, and 6) the ineffectiveness of the feeble American mind to prevent all of this from happening (here, the U.S. public education system bears down with full might.)

All Obama had to do was skillfully weave his oratory web to convince Americans that the greatest Republic on earth required “fundamental change” and that he did. To facilitate it, he applied our own counterinsurgency against us.

What follows are the relevant extracts from the short article that should be consumed in full.

We’re talking about the CIA – the most formidable intelligence agency in existence and one that is prohibited by law from operating domestically against American citizens. Now ask yourself if such an outfit would shoot blindly from the hip in controverting something as legally and constitutionally substantial as operating against Americans in America? Not in a million years would they do that. Rather, the CIA would rely on a trusted and vetted system of proprietary knowledge that has been field tested for efficacy in other nations and specifically devised to deliver the operational objective here, which is regime change. The U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine from 2009 that is our primary focus in this is a perfect example of what I just described.

Dating back a year to last I began to refer to Devin Nunes’ “Horrible Hundred,” which was in reference to the over 100 MSM reporters he indicated were under sealed indictment. Look back over the past several years and ask yourself if the above description is accurate relative to the MSM up to today? What is Operation Mockingbird? It certainly bears down here.

How many times have MSM reporters gotten it wrong when they were so adamant they had it right and never really with any formal and appropriate correction of the record: Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, insurrection, impeachment 2.0, the stolen 2020 election, the Biden presidency, and more.?

Is that a result of all of those reporters merely getting all of that wrong consistently and collectively over time or is it such that those reporters are functionaries of the CIA either directly or indirectly and wittingly or unwittingly? I do this work (as a former fraud investigator) for fun; as a hobby. I don’t make a penny from it and I work alone (acknowledging others in my backdrop.) So, why is it that all of my established, sourced, cited and evidenced findings exist in a different universe than theirs? Rhetorical question.

Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and common sense – regardless of party affiliation – who still believes the MSM writ large only does so because it tickles them right where it matters most and because they’re too intellectually undeveloped to challenge their own conventions; hence the aforementioned feeble American mind.

As painfully as it is to state this, there has never been a more perfect and timely moment than now to actually listen to Nancy Pelosi speak. Here Pelosi galvanizes the prior points and the point above while she marries it all to the MSM.

The “tools of war abroad” have come home? I’m here to tell you that the primary tool that served as the blueprint for an ongoing overthrow was/is the same precise and exact U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine that was applied and which I identified.

Planted stories? Do these sound like planted stories that were hammered home by the MSM ad nauseam and using tactics like multiple sources and wrap-up smears: Flynn, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, insurrection, impeachment 2.0, the stolen 2020 election and the Biden presidency? Taking what they reported then against what you know to be true now does it appear that there was/is a cohort of the CIA, U.S. politicians, relevant corporate sectors (BIG MONEY, BIG MEDIA & BIG TECH) and the MSM that is operating domestically and to affect the U.S. populace toward a desired outcome?

Latch onto the notion of taking down a sitting president on the 2017 timeline. Now examine the timeline I’ve been compiling for several years but which remains incomplete. Simply apply some logical deduction to gain meaning from this – substantial, critical and foundational meaning.

It’s obvious the author is tying in contemporaneous examples such as the fraudulent Mueller special counsel construct and that is why the entire source article is worthy – there is an abundance of similar evidentiary examples of which I spared you most of the granular details to remain focused on counterinsurgency. Did the press; however, swallow it all or were they complicit in comply aligning with the narrative as being sown by the intelligence community that is at the foundation of everything? Rhetorical question. See the Nunes Horrible Hundred.

Take note of the overlaps that thread throughout the entire tappestry of our case: ODNI (intelligence community), HPSCI, Russia, elections, MSM, CIA, Middle East, counterinsurgency, etc. These overlaps don’t occur specifally and by accident, circumstance or coincidence. All of this is constructed and the schmatics derive from U.S. counterinsurgency doctrine.

The author’s conclusion needs no further commentary.

CONSPIRACY PUT TO REST

President Obama hit the ground running in January 2009. As he was promising to “fundamentally change” America, he also took to a complete rewrite of U.S. biosecurity rules that would leave U.S. biocontianment facilities in a regulatory fog for over a decade.

Obama would also take a fundamental step to deliver us the designed status quo. The blueprint for that design, which would leverage federalism to overthrow the U.S. federal government and remove a sitting president was existing U.S. counterinsurgency doctirne that Obama mapped-over the U.S. and effectively, its people.

What allows us to put the conspiratorial aspects of this to rest comes in two forms – the truth and all of the sourced and cited evidence in support of it.

(U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide 2009-2017 – SOURCE DOCUMENT)

-End-

Fauci’s Free Fall, Fort Dietrick Focus and Full Conspiracy to Commit Fraud

There are four ways to pick-up a rope: at one end, at the other end, somewhere in the middle or as coiled up causing one to hold multiple sections at once and with neither end in hand. With the two former, there is but one direction to go – opposite of the end being held. If holding it by a section somewhere in between, you may go in either direction or both. In the latter instance you’re holding multiple sections of the rope and with neither end is in hand and often times, not even in sight. Conducting investigations is like the last analog; especially given the nature of our subject.

[Author’s Note: Preliminary proofing is complete but this still requires revision.]

As we get into this we’re going to once again blend new work into a foundation of older, existing work to provide even more clarity to the status quo and the body of work we’ve been compiling behind the scenes since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 was first reported on 27 Dec 19, and publicly since January 2020. It may feel like you’re holding a coiled rope in your hand because it’s complex.

For proper backdrop, all of the Moonshine articles from 21 May up to this one briefly recapitulate a lot of work and positions from about 180 others. That subject matter should be understood for proper comprehension here.

This will amount to another substantial piece and our curiosity begins with a tighter focus on Ft. Dietrick (Maryland) as we began discussing it in the last article. Fort Dietrick is our focus for two primary reasons – it’s the U.S. Army’s home to biowarfare and it has a long, recent and relevant history of severe biosecurity lapses. We also acknowledge the reality that it’s a difficult to obtain much more than cursory information about a facility like this, so complete evidence becomes impossible to obtain.

Moreover and drawing back on several articles but most notably Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules, which fortunately caught the eye of Lin Wood for reposting, the entire network of U.S. bio-containment facilities, appears to have been operating under an intentional, deliberate and instituted “fog” of biosecurity ineptitude from January 2009 forward.

UNCOILING A MASSIVE ROPE

As discussed in the aforementioned article, the fog starts to roll in with James LeDuc of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, TX,

Let’s start with James LeDuc from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston; which is only about 55 or so miles from the now shuttered Chinese consulate in Houston that is known as a hotbed for Deep State/CCP activity and which was recently observed (last summer) burning documents on its rooftop. Notably, our reporting has previously covered how the UTMD was enmeshed in the COVID-19 pandemic in troubling ways.

It was LeDuc’s long-tenured relationships with the CDC, UTMB and Anthony Fauci; including being the recipient of substantial funding from Fauci, that when matched with his with his recommendation to examine the WIV using a pro-China narrative (that such a possibility is “less likely”) that is causing us to scrutinize him more closely.

LeDuc set us on this course and that work grew some legs; potentially long ones.

What really holds our attention with LeDuc is this – his advisement to upper echelon scientists in the area of biosecurity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2008 and as an overlap to Obama’s first term beginning in 2009; and emphasizing our position that Obama has been and continues to run point on all things and whereas Biden is his (and China’s/CCP’s) proxy in an otherwise shadow government (video below).

In the article, I established a position that immediately upon entering office, Barack Obama began a rewrite of U.S. biosecurity rules writ large.

Moreover, the rewrite was permitted by an executive order issued 11 days before an outgoing George W. Bush would leave office. It functionally served as a hand-off to Obama to begin the rewrite.

Remember that one aspect to concealing evidence of crimes within the practice of statecraft is to allow a construct to transit across presidential administrations. This binds those presidents in the conspiracy, which lends towards keeping it secretive, while it also compartmentalizes the culpability in disassociated chunks making it much more difficult to demonstrate and prove the construct as a crime. That’s what’s happening with here.

Also, remember this – it was 9/11 and the associated October 2001 anthrax scare that was packaged up to rationalize and justify the expansion of the U.S. biowarfare program and ultimately leading to the biosecurity rules rewrite. As I continue to delineate, 9/11 and COVID-19 are sequential significant markers on a generational political continuum that was interrupted by an “un-rigged” 2016 Trump victory.

Moving forward in this position, a late 2014 Department of Homeland Security memo co-issued by Lisa Monaco instituted a biosecurity stand down at all U.S. biosecurity labs. It served as a preemptive maneuver to envelop all necessary and ongoing gain of function and bio-weaponization work from select labs while not drawing attention to them.

Then from 2015-2016, that U.S. work was halted and off-shored to the Wuhan Institute of Virology; and whereby the Fauci cohort then funded China’s work with U.S. taxpayer dollars and provided SARS-CoV-2 samples.

In all of that, the rules rewrite was underpinned by a philosophical approach centered on cleverly compartmentalizing U.S. biosecurity within a “culture of responsibility” and the individual scientists themselves instead of an approach to actual robust biosecurity system. LeDuc’s work underpinned the philosophy, which he then shared with scientists at the WIV in 2008.

Recall that LeDuc’s UTMB, like many U.S. universities, interfaced with China relative to COVID-19 and perhaps not coincidentally. Last summer, then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo spoke directly to China’s relationships with U.S. universities as if placing them on notice. A piece from the Gateway Pundit recently included links to Chinese military scientists that builds on our preexisting work and lends to more universities momentarily. From TGP,

A number of U.S.-based or funded scientists have been directly collaborating with the PLA Military Veterinary Research Institute, all supported by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or other U.S. government departments.

They include Stanley Pearlman of the University of Iowa, Pei-Yong Shi (2021) and Vineet Menachery (October 2020) of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Linfa Wang of the Duke University-National University of Singapore, Martha Stokes of the Biological Threat Reduction Program, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (February 2021) and Scott McVey of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Iowa, Duke (Singapore) and UTMB are referenced and North Carolina and Minnesota will follow.

Latching onto a middle-of-the-rope section in the 2015-2016 time frame, we can drag-in Anthony Fauci and then backtrack that to his boss, the Director of the NIH Francis Collins, and then right to gain of function research. Oddly enough and appearing as cryptic predictive programming, a cohort of the usual suspects even took to coalescing on the last episode of the Colbert Report as if to provide us a foreboding and ominous message. It included Dr. Collins, who is regarded as one of the most powerful but least known individuals in D.C.

FalseFlagFauci is first, though.

Our position on Fauci’s culpability and the carve-out being made for his dispatching is deepened by recent developments.

A Zero Hedge item authored by Sharyl Attkisson of The Epoch Times outlines three broader positions that align with ours and provide more evidence and nexuses: 1) U.S. taxpayer money did go to gain of function research, 2) the U.S. funded China gain of function research both directly and indirectly (via the Ecohealth Alliance) and 3) the WIV received direct and indirect funding (via EcoHealth Alliance).

In that piece, we also take note of the ties to the University of North Carolina and where, “The research was conducted by numerous U.S. scientists including Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina with the lead virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology: Shi Zhengli. (See study authors below.)

We also note the flow of funding from the NIH and Fauci,

“Several millions of dollars in tax money sent from the NIH to the Wuhan lab via the New York-based nonprofit “EcoHealth Alliance.” However, research with the lab, and the lab itself, received significant additional U.S. support including: Grants directly from the NIH (and) Grants directly from Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the NIH. (See grant numbers highlighted below.)”

The piece also includes an extract relative to gain of function research and C.T. Tseng of the UTMB while that also links back to my previous work with regard to LeDuc, UTMB and the WIV,

“Assistance from the University of Texas. (See excerpt from study below.)

State Department cables from January 2018 detail assistance from the University of Texas Medical Branch, including university “researchers … helping train technicians who work” in the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab. The Texas lab is supported by Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under NIH. (See excerpt from cable below.)”

A second Zero Hedge piece authored by Zack Stieber of The Epoch Times details the controversial dollar amounts more closer,

The United States gave over $800,000 to the top-level laboratory in China from which some believe the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus escaped, according to newly released documents.

Internal emails from officials with the National Institutes of Health and an office inside the agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), show they discussed in 2020 a question from Republican members of Congress regarding how much the agencies sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The total amount sent between Fiscal Years 2014 and 2019 was $826,777, according to the officials.
The funding went to EcoHealth Alliance, which channeled money to the lab for the purpose of “understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.”

“We had a modest collaboration with respectable Chinese scientists who are world experts on coronavirus and we did that through a subgrant from a larger grant to EcoHealth. The subgrant was about $600,000 over a period of five years,” Fauci told members of the House Appropriations Committee during a hearing last month.

The newly released emails show one chain involving Fauci in April 2020. In it, a top NIAID official, Dr. Emily Erbelding, informed Fauci and others that a new grant to EcoHealth was for $3.6 million. Of that, about $750,000 would go to the Wuhan lab. About $75,000 had already been sent to the lab during year 1 of the grant, she said.

The EcoHealth Alliance has become redundant in all of this for good reason. Consider this email from our article discussing the recently release tranche of Fauci emails.

Here’s the email discussion from the article,

This emails is significant for a spectrum of critical reasons: 1) Fauci and another are represented as conspiring to deliver a known fraudulent narrative via the MSM, 2) This overlaps the precise mid-April 2020 shift when the CDC/WHO cohort moved the conventionally accepted pandemic measurement – mortality data – which was in decline at that time, to infection data, or “new case data” and so as to drag the pandemic through the seasonal die-off of the co-morbidities being statistically leveraged and right back to peak-flu of 2020-2021, which the CDC begins every December 1st, 3) Fauci is shown crafting the narrative to comport with the forthcoming anticipated explosion of cases as constructively delivered by deliberately faulty PCR testing that the Democrats began calling for dating back to January 2020, and 4) It is relative to the legendary April 2020 news conference that I mention often and for which it seems most people missed the most important angle whereby President Trump dragged Fauci back to the podium and forced him to correct his own record and in so doing, Trump compartmentalized all of the COVID-19 matter entirely within the Fauci/Pence cohort (pandemic response team), which effectively usurped the President’s emergency powers with the 11 Mar 20 declaration of a national emergency.

Here we tie it together. Where does Peter Daszak work? Eco-Health Alliance.

It can even be extended further to envelop more of the usual suspects.

Dasazk’s name is obvious but look at the 11:05 entry and the name Nancy Messonnier. As John Here to Help reminds us, Messonnier is the wife of none other than Rod Rosenstein. Oh what a tangled web we weave.

We’ve long documented #FalseFlagFauci’s treason and crimes and the evidence continues to stack up in perfect alignment. With his carve-out near complete and shaping up as a fraudulently framed retirement or resignation, Dan Bongino recently reported on his show that there may be an open criminal investigation into the “lab leak” matter. This overlap is not coincidental. How long before you read a headline noting that Fauci has retained counsel (likely already lined-up and ready to go but not obviously public).

Fauci’s days are numbered and so are those of his boss. Who is Anthony Fauci’s boss?

Anthony Fauci and his NIAID fall under the auspices of National Institutes of Health and the directorship of Francis Collins, MD, PhD. Dr. Collins is a University of North Carolina alum (redundant location) and he was on The New Republic’s list of D.C.’s most powerful but least famous people.

This is Dr. Collins and note three things – 1) my established position about constructs transiting presidential administrations, 2) the fact that Collins is the only NIH director to ever transit presidential administrations and 3) that his placement comports precisely with Obama’s first term to which I’ve drawn everything back and supported with cited evidence.

Note that you’ll see a similar account of intentional asset placement when we talk below about Battelle.

Remembering that an unwritten rule to evil is that its purveyors must at least symbolically message their intentions; if not directly message them. That makes Collins’ previously noted appearance on the final episode of the Colbert Report both eerie and prognosticating.

Get a load of this noting the title of the song – “We’ll Be Back” – and the cast of characters featured (otherwise the usual suspects.)

Before you do, here is why I regard Colbert as a messaging platform (SHADOW GOVERNMENT video),

SHADOW GOVERNMENT (from Spring 2020)

Here’s the Colbert piece introduced at the beginning,

Now watch what happens with Collins and our ability to tie him back to some of the earliest work in running down a brand new outbreak with little available information to be had.

The linkage is from an article by The Defender that specifically references Wellcome Trust. The entire article is highly worthy and ties the recent tranche of Fauci emails to Wellcome Trust, Collins, Fauci, NIH, Peter Daszak, Eco-Health Alliance, NIAID, WIV, WHO, Gates, Farrar and others.

The Defender’s findings were,

What does all this mean?

-There was a conspiracy between the five authors of the Nature paper and the heads of the NIH, NIAID and Wellcome Trust to cover up the lab origin of COVID.
-There was a conspiracy involving Daszac, Fauci and others to push the natural origin theory. (See other emails in the recent drop.)
-There was a conspiracy involving Daszac to write the Lancet letter and hide its provenance, to push the natural origin theory and paint any other ideas as conspiracy theory. Collin’s blog post is another piece of this story.
-Farrar was intimately involved in both large hydroxychloroquine overdose trials, in which about 500 subjects total died.
-Farrar, Fauci and Collins withheld research funds that could have supported quality trials of the use of chloroquine drugs and ivermectin and other repurposed drugs that might have turned around the pandemic.
-Are the four individuals named here — Fauci, Daszak, Collins and Farrar —  intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?

Here it is – the Collins bit just introduced. Watch what happens with Collins when we tug on Wellcome Trust I as reported back on 08 Mar 20.

Would the billionaires – Soros and Gates as previously and firmly established – stand to gain if, say, they owned and/or controlled the patents to the only known effective treatment for COVID-19 (Remdesivir via Gilead Sciences via Unitaid via Soros) and the most promising coronavirus strain for a vaccine (Gates)? One would certainly think so; especially given the nature of the presumed executed patent-sharing strategies as previously outlined.

Here’s what has been previously established about Gates in my previous work linked above: he owns the patent to the most promising coronavirus strain for a vaccine; he controls the World Health Organization through funding via his foundation; the World Bank relies solely on the WHO’s pandemic declaration to trigger pandemic bonds that would result in the loss of huge sums of money; and he created, controls and funds the CEPI circa 2016. The same CEPI that is now rolling out its Armageddon prognostication about COVID-19. Consider this from the CEPI’s own page sourced HERE (emphasis mine.)

CEPI was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum.
CEPI has secured $760 million toward its $1billion funding target, with multi-year funding from Norway, UK, Germany, Japan, Canada, Ethiopia, Australia, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Wellcome. CEPI has also received single-year investments from the governments of Belgium. The European Commission provides substantial financial contributions to support relevant projects through its mechanisms.

Close collaboration with global partners is also crucial to the success of our work to develop vaccines against emerging infectious diseases. That’s why work with industry, regulators, and other bodies to ensure that any vaccines we develop get licensed and can reach the people who need them.
CEPI

Pulling on that string goes back to the very foundation of all the work here. It envelops the WHO, Soros, Gates, China, the World Economic Forum/Klaus Schwab, the CEPI, Gilead Sciences, pandemic bonds, the World Bank, patent-sharing deals for vaccines and treatments, and more.

The 11 Mar 20 declaration of a national emergency for the pandemic bears down with full force because it functioned to allow the Fauci cohort to usurp the President’s emergency powers and it triggered all of the pandemic bonds and existing and emerging patent-sharing deals.

What’s happened between now and that earlier work is the ability to factually bridge it together.

There is more to Colllins though, and it’s a monumental aspect to the entire construct. It us draws back on the 2015-2016 timeline when the Fauci cohort was off-shoring U.S. gain of function research to the WIV in China.

Remembering that the only reason the Fauci cohort was required to off-shore its GOF work to China was that internal U.S. whistleblowers were coming forward to report it. Otherwise I’m sure it would have continued unnoticed. With that said, look at what Collins did.

On 19 Dec 17, Collins and the NIH lifted the U.S. moratorium on GOF work citing that it was “important in helping us identify, understand, and develop strategies and effective countermeasures against rapidly evolving pathogens that pose a threat to public health.”

Translated, that’s the same philosophical type of bullshit that underpinned Obama’s rewrite of U.S. biosecurity that has resulted in a less robust U.S. biosecurity system that is rife with compromises and has produced a fog that enshrouds a wide swath of questionable occurrences and practices. That fog is functional and not coincidental.

Examine the Collins GOF decision factors into what I’ve branded the most important contemporary timeline in U.S. history. It’s from an exclusive but incomplete timeline I’ve been assembling for several years.

On that same general timeline, now consider these developments as noted in a Homeland Security News Wire bulletin circa 02 Apr 18. Note how Ft. Dietrick surfaces relative to congressional funding to narrow our focus on it below.

The Fort Detrick, Maryland-based National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) is no longer facing an immediate jeopardy. The federal omnibus spending bill,  released last Wednesday evening, provided full funding for the biohazard laboratory – funding which the original administration’s budget proposal eliminated.

The Fort Detrick, Maryland-based National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) is no longer facing an immediate jeopardy. The federal omnibus spending bill,  released last Wednesday evening, provided full funding for the biohazard laboratory – funding which the original administration’s budget proposal eliminated (see “Proposed budget cuts will weaken state, local ability to handle biological, chemical attacks,” HSNW, 5 October 2017; and “U.S. not prepared to identify perpetrators of biological attacks: Expert panel,” HSNW 10 October 2017).

The Frederick News-Post reports that “The bill fully restores funding for federal laboratories the Trump administration proposed to close, including continued operational costs of $44.3 million for the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC). The Fort Detrick facility includes two high-level laboratories that handle federal select agents and toxins, including the Ebola virus, ricin and avian influenza.”

Note that Congress is working opposite of President Trump by funding to keep open bio-containment facilities he had planned to close. Means, motive and opportunity – all can be demonstrated here relative to those in Congress who have exposure to severe liability. Their opposition is not by accident (HPSCI and SSCI bear down hard.)

Let’s sidebar on Ft. Dietrick and tie it right back to the Fauci/Collins cohort to go forward.

THE ENTANGLEMENT OF CDC AND FT. DIETRICK

The backdrop to Ft. Dietrick is mysterious, complex and involves some notable lapses in biosecurity as occurring at convenient times relative to our positions.

From a Military.com article,

The inspection findings also found that USAMRIID did not have a complete, accurate inventory of its select agents. That has been resolved, Cox said.

The Laboratory Response Network is made up of three laboratories — one operated by the Navy, USAMRIID and the CDC. The three are responsible for determining unknown material.

While operations were shut down at USAMRIID, the Army laboratory still did some work. But if it identified something that fell under the Federal Select Agent Program, it either stored the material in the freezer, as it was with the rest of the biological select agents or toxins it has, or sent it to one of the other laboratories, Cox said.

While under the partial suspension, the CDC will approve the studies USAMRIID scientists wish to do, Cox said. USAMRIID leadership will have to send an outline of proposed research, including what agent it will involve, among other details. CDC personnel will then review the plan and interview the scientists to make sure they are trained and can do the research, he said.
There is no concern about intellectual property under the CDC approval model, he said. And he did not think it would affect grants. During the shut down, USAMRIID scientists were able to continue writing grants, among other duties, like consulting or education, he said.

“USAMRIID did not have a complete, accurate inventory of its select agents” equates to not being able to determine whether BSATs were missing; stolen or otherwise.

“There is no concern about intellectual property under the CDC approval model…he did not think it would affect grants…During the shut down, USAMRIID scientists continue(d) writing grants…consulting or education” equates to an interface where the CDC cohort (Collins, Fauci, et al.) can access Department of Defense proprietary knowledge. And what do the Fauci, Collins, LeDuc et al. do? They share proprietary knowledge, consult, advise and fund China on these exact matters.

It appears that in the fog, they created a portal to access (steal?) DoD secrets and give them to China.

Also note some important timeline markers. The sourced article detailing the Ft. Dietrick reopening is dated 24 Nov 19 placing it 1) after the actual breakout in China in October 2019, 2) after the revised original outbreak date of 17 Nov 19 and 3) before the original outbreak date of 27 Dec 19. Clear as mud but nonetheless important.

Within Ft. Dietrick there is an entity called Battelle, which was ushered-in via the inception of the Department of Homeland Security, which came about with 9/11. This is Battelle,

Battelle, is a functionary of the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC) vis-a-vis the same Department of Homeland Security that issued the Monaco memo for a national security stand down at U.S. bio-containment facilities in late 2014. That served as the pretext to off-shore U.S. gain of function research to the WIV in China.

Realize that Batelle is FEDERALLY FUNDED and regulated; but it’s not a federal entity and that’s critical. It means Battelle like a private entity akin to the Federal Reserve.

What this looks like to a fraud investigator is the compartmentalization of culpability outside of the federal apparatus ergo outside of peering eyes within it, like the OIG.

Here’s what Battelle does. A federal entity – the NBACC – outsourced the management of its proprietary research that developed the science critical to defend the United States against bioterrorism.

It outsourced it to Batelle National Biodefense Institute (BNBI) as a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC). FFRDCs are public-private partnerships which conduct research for the United States Government. They are administered in accordance with U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48, Part 35, Section 35.017 by universities and corporations.

How many times has this continuum featured the merger of public and private entities? Again, these people do things in specific ways.

The NBACC was the first laboratory built for DHS to understand the scientific basis of the risk posed by biological threats and to attribute their use in “bioterror” and “biocrime” events. And it’s managed by a public-private entity.

Now watch what happens with Battelle.

Thinking back to the outbreak of COVID-19 and going back to some of our earliest research, do you remember something called “Event 201?”

It was a joint effort on 18 Oct 19, just a couple of months before the 27 Dec 19 first report of COVID-19, and it merged Johns Hopkins with Bill Gates, the Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum/Klaus Schwab to game a pandemic crisis as a practice event.

In other words, it was pre-game warm-up. Practice. A trial run. Working the kinks out of planned systems. Whatever you want to call it.

Now look at this 11 Dec 18 article entitled “Battelle Selects New Director For National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center,” and think back to the congressional funding occurring at around the same time counter to Trumps intentions.

“The Battelle National Biodefense Institute (BNBI) has selected Dr. George W. Korch, Jr. as the new lab director for the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC).

We did an extensive national search and I’m confident we found the best leader for the NBACC mission. Not only does he bring the experience of managing a nationally recognized biodefense lab and directing biosecurity programs, he has unparalleled scientific credentials as evidenced by his faculty affiliation with Johns Hopkins University.”

Returning to Fort Detrick will be a homecoming for Korch who served as the Commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID).  He was also instrumental in the creation of NBACC in the wake of the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003.

“I’m thrilled to be returning to Fort Detrick and taking on the leadership of NBACC,” Korch said.  “The NBACC’s twin missions of threat characterization and bioforensics are essential and critical for our nation’s long-term biosecurity and for the continuous, real-time needs of federal law enforcement.”

Battelle draws right back to Johns Hopkins.

As aligned to our position(s), wouldn’t it make sense for the Gates/Johns Hopkins/World Economic Forum/Schwab/Fauci/Collins cohort to have its own pre-placed asset inside Battelle to facilitate the public and private linkage that this cartel exploits to conduct illegal business? These people operate in specific ways.

We can make these types of connections all day long and forever (actually, I have.) They’re everywhere and it appears Fauci and Collins may have a prized Johns Hopkins asset in place to manage the nation’s biosecurity developments for DHS and the Congress that fully funded all of it; and in spite of President Trump’s plans to shutter some of those facilities.

At what point do all of the overlaps, coincidences and redundancy form something greater than speculation?

From here, it only gets worse for the treasonous Fauci and Collins cohort because we now have a dead Chinese scientist who links back to very old work.

Another Zero Hedge article describes the developing update. Due to length, I debated including this full extract and did so because its content is critical and the full context is needed.

As you read it, pay attention to the complications that arise on the timeline relative to the time needed to conventionally develop a vaccine,

Zhou Yusen (is) a Chinese military scientist specializing in coronaviruses who collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “Bat Woman,” Zhengli Shi – with at least one project to geneticially manipulate coronaviruses having been funded by three grants from the National Institutes of Heath (NIH)  – home to Dr. Anthony Fauci – via US universities, according to documents obtained by The Weekend Australian (ostensibly leaked by Aussie intelligence). The previously undisclosed NIH funding of a PLA military scientist is separate from millions in grants awarded EcoHealth alliance, which also collaborated with the WIV.

The revelation shows American money was funding risky ­research on coronaviruses with People’s Liberation Army scientists – including decorated military scientist Zhou Yusen and the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “Bat Woman”, Shi Zhengli.
Now we learn that Zhou, 54, is dead – three months after filing a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine in Feb. 2020.

The revelation that the US government was funding his research with the WIV may provide a clue as to why US officials – Dr. Fauci (backed by the ‘scientific community’ after his lapdog, EcoHealth Alliance’s Peter Daszak, penned a ‘natural origin or you’re a lunatic’ letter in the Lancet) – peddled the CCP’s ‘natural origin’ theory, while any suggestion that it could have been created in and/or leaked from the very lab which received NIH dollars was strictly verboten. 

The revelation shows American money was funding risky ­research on coronaviruses with People’s Liberation Army scientists – including decorated military scientist Zhou Yusen and the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s “Bat Woman”, Shi Zhengli.
National security sources said the ties between Zhou and Dr Shi ­supported claims by US intelligence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was engaged in “secret military activity.” -The Australian

Zhou died three months after filing a Feb. 24, 2020 patent application for a COVID-19 vaccine. While this could mean that he was working on a COVID-19 vaccine before the virus became public knowledge in December 2019, keep in mind that Moderna was able to design the sequence for their COVID-19 vaccine just two days after Chinese officials released its genetic sequence on Jan. 11, 2020 – filing for their first related patent in March, two months later.

Also note that Zhou had been working on coronavirus vaccines since at least 2006 in response the original SARS-CoV outbreak – authoring a study which found that “the vaccines containing the (receptor-binding domain) of SARS-CoV S protein may induce sufficient neutralising antibodies and long-term ­protective immunity against SARS-CoV challenge in the ­established mouse model.”

An expert would need approximately two months to go from genomic sequence to patent application, it implies that China withheld the genetic sequence for a month before its Jan. 11 public release. Or, Zhou may have had more of a ‘head start’ than that. 
“This is something we have never seen achieved before, raising the question of whether this work may have started much ­earlier,” said Nikolai Petrovsky from Flinders University.

Right before the pandemic, Zhou and three other scientists from the PLA-run Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology – Yuehong Chen, Lei He and Shishui Sun – partnered with two Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists – Dr Shi and Jing Chen – and eight Chinese scientists now based in the US at the University of Minnesota and the Lindsley Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Centre. Their paper, titled Molecular Mechanism for Antibody-­Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry, was submitted to the Journal of Virology on November 27, 2019, and was published on February 14, 2020.

That means either the virus was “out” for many months to a couple of years before February of 2020 (not a month or two) or the Chinese intended to release it in the fall of 2019.  In either case the evidence is now overwhelming that this was not a virus that “magically appeared” one fine day in late December having come naturally from bats and perhaps pangolins. That is not just improbable anymore — it is now, on the manifest weight of the evidence, impossible.

Remember that Covid-19 has a rather-unique site on the spike called the “furin-cleavage” area which it uses to “fold” and get into the cell; the S1 unit attaches, the cleavage area “folds” and then the second part penetrates the cell wall like a spear.  SARS and MERS both lack this structure so there was no “prior art” to use and in the first couple of months the characterizing of all of this was pretty darn new.

That long extract is devastating, it adds the University of Minnesota to our list and it provides a unique reference that I’m sure no one else will catch and it’s the “no prior art” quote.

I believe “art” to have two significant tiebacks.

First, “art” or ART refers to this, “The FDA approved more than two dozen antiretroviral drugs to treat HIV infection. They’re often broken into six groups because they work in different ways. Doctors recommend taking a combination or “cocktail” of at least two of them. This is called antiretroviral therapy, or ART.”

It’s also notable that the patent that Zhou was filing for was Gilead’s Remdesivir, which constitutes the origins of all of my written work. I simply started out wanting to know who stood to benefit from Remdesivir (on top of everything else I had already informally accumulated.)

Secondly and with ART being specific to HIV, remember that our work references evidence of genetic markers inside of the SARS-CoV-2 strain indicative of 6 artificial HIV insertions that go unexplained in nature. Importantly, it’s the capabilities of the HIV inserts, as rendered by GOF research, that allow SARS-CoV-2 to function as designed – to transmit and spread.

Now watch what happens and see where we can take this relative to ART. The origins for what follows is one of the Hunter Biden hard drives relative to the Hunter Biden laptop story.

From my 25 Oct 20 article,

Returning to the hard drive and how a friendly whistleblower is said to have subverted the Biden/DOJ effort to shield the evidence from daylight by taking the materials into custody, we learn that a second hard drive that contains information about Xi’s and Wang’s wealth information and other materials, including their asset allocations in the U.S.

“Architecture” and “Art Project” are introduced as the names for Xi and Wang’s “extremely grand plan.” “This plan is to (control) not only the 1.4 billion Chinese people” but also “the United Nations” and the “United States.”

Moreover and specifically, the plan is to also control “the U.S. President” and “any future Presidents.”

Now think very long and very hard about how I have outlined ad nauseam the precise triggers and mechanisms that have been pulled and set-off as it relates to primarily Dr. Anthony Fauci’s usurpation of the President’s emergency powers immediately upon the declaration of a national emergency on 11 Mar 20. At that precise moment, the CCP was in de facto control of the United States vis-a-vis Fauci vis-a-vis Fauci’s string pullers and handlers.

Together, Fauci and the CCP closed schools; shuttered the economy; destroyed jobs and businesses; instigated, funded and organized riots started and began a new fake race war; and they did all of it by leveraging those friendly governors in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Washington and my state of Oregon. Fauci and the CCP wrecked the U.S. and they leveraged those we trusted the most to do it.

“ALL SHALL BE UNDER CCP’S CONTROL.” I need not elaborate on that, right?

The details of it all are absurd. It was a $4.5 billion dollar deal that involved exactly what I outlined months ago – exploiting the natural gas markets in Ukraine and Kazakhstan to move money.

On the presumption that “Art Project” refers to the COVID-19 construct; and it should given the descriptive language that we could find, “Architecture” is likely to be a reference to half of China’s One Belt One Road doctrine that I’ve previously covered and more specifically, the infrastructure interface. That is how I recently tied it back to the Biden administration and the looming U.S. infrastructure bill that stands to see communist Chinese doctrine applied to the U.S.

What is the other half of One Belt One Road? Energy. Where does China’s interface with energy occur? With CEFC (CCP). With what entity did Hunter Biden broker a $1.5 billion private equity deal in energy? The CEFC.

Here is the fundamental translation to take away from this – ART PROJECT equates to the broader COVID-19 construct and it establishes ENERGY as the conduit to move all of the associated money.

This is something no one else has told you and I wrote a substantial piece on it that Lin Wood also re-posted entitled Follow the Money. It focuses narrowly on the Hunter Biden/China/CCP/PLA/CEFC [The CEFC China Energy Company] private equity deal in energy that underpins this and correlates with an exponential increase the Joe/Jill Biden’s income from 2017-2019 over 2016.

There is added value in conducting illegitimate business under the guise of legitimate private equity deals in energy and I’ve chased the Biden’s all over the globe looking at them. Most importantly, it’s the added value provided by Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives and its Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Consider this and ask yourself it it lends toward corruption in the energy sector as I’ve asserted?

From the House Committee on Eneregy and Commerce Committee website,

THE END OF THE ROPE

We uncoiled a rope and looked at several critical segments of it including the Fauci emails; the carve-out for Fauci’s fall, how and why that’s happening; the entanglements of Ft. Dietrick; the continued leveraging of universities and public-private entities; the bio-security rules rewrite under Obama and the DHS implications relative to off-shoring GOF research; sponsorship and funding of GOF research; tie-backs to foundational work into the systems that serving the COVID-19 construct; how U.S. biosecurity management was outsourced; how Congress acted counter to Trump and funded facilities set to be shuttered; and more.

More importantly and in all of that, we provide the granular details and evidence to cohesively make it function as a fulsome working explanation of the greatest fraud ever committed against humanity.

Most importantly is that all of it rests on evidence that draws down on China and the administrations of George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

We’ll be back soon to continue building our positions, making our case and in ways no one else has, and explaining what is actually being done to us.

-End-

A World War III No One Can See

Why can’t Americans see it? Or is it simply that Americans don’t want to see it? It appears that it’s an easier and more convenient endeavor for many Americans to bury the same curiosity that killed the cat in order to embrace the mainstream narrative and just get along with the masses – following orders, wearing masks, getting vaccines and with some shouting “orange man bad!” Some shout it until the vessels in their eyes rupture turning white to blood red and as emblematic of their own deep-seated sense that something is fundamentally wrong with the status quo; and it’s eating at their very core, but they’re reluctant to even acknowledge it, much less reverse course on it and their own conventions in order to do something about it. None of that is very American.

For many, there is an impenetrable barrier standing between the reality these people perceive and the reality in which they live and whereby the latter remains sequestered and inaccessible.

Even for those who are on board with an off-reservation understanding that COVID-19 is something beyond the MSM narrative explanation, there is a barrier preventing them from logically extending the position to include an actual, asymmetrical and undeclared third world war that began with the release of a bio-WMD by China in October 2019.

Perhaps this is an indictment against public education. The people certainly weren’t taught accurate content in important civics classes just as the onus to be an engaged and civic-minded individual has been contorted away from original intent rebranded as a doctrine of social justice.

Moreover and more importantly, it seems Americans were never taught how to be or were encouraged to be critical and independent thinkers. This opens the door for the liars to insert their “fact checkers” whom many Americans blindly trust while not realizing that the fact checkers are Judas goats of the unaware truth seekers.

Had they been properly educated, Americans would have booted Fauci to the curb around the same time I first zeroed in on him over a year ago because they have access to all of the same information I do.

Perhaps this is indicative of a public education system that more closely resembles a public indoctrination system. Is that system compromised by China. In short and from prior work, yes. Is this coincidental? No.

The MSM narrative substantially reinforces the effectiveness of this barrier by working like a river flowing with a complex system of interlaced tributaries thats deliver downstream a brew of propagated government elixir that Americans swill as if out of dependency.

Logical deduction, half a century of observing humans and psychological armchair quarterbacking makes me reasonably think that this barrier may be, at least in part, created by their own fear that in some way, they may perceive a tinge of culpability for having been duped into the status quo by their political idols and heroes.

If you know humans, you know that they love to double-down in situations exactly like this one, which is why they still wear masks, get the vaccine and insist that you do all of the same.

After all and as we know it to be, it’s easier to lie to people than to convince them they’ve been lied to.

If you know humans, you know that deep down inside them something like what I’m describing exists whether they consciously know it or not.

It’s important to note that there is also a segment of the population that just plainly believes differently and sadly, no degree of logic or volume of evidence is going to remove them from the dissenters.

In tragic form, it’s all nonsense, too, because quite frankly and with open arms, a bunch of us have been eagerly waiting for them to awaken and arrive to join us; and the sooner the better.

On varying timelines, some Americans have progressed faster than others in acknowledging our reality, divesting from the MSM matrix and establishing a self-imposed doctrine of critical and independent thinking prerogatives applied to the consumption of trusted and vetted sources that routinely deliver reliable information.

These Americans have likely already pondered the angle of a third world war; perhaps even accepting it as factual. Others not.

I wrote this a little over a year ago on 06 May 20 in the article Making the Case for Treason,

What did the headlines look like after the virus arrived stateside? Why did all of those same people – AFTER IMPEACHMENT; AFTER THE OUTBREAK; AFTER THE COVID-19 US ARRIVAL – then change their tune and drag the President through the mud publicly criticizing every single measure he took or didn’t take? Everything he said or didn’t say… almost as if it were planned that way.

President Trump was placed into a trap by his political enemies and it ravaged the country and all because criminal infiltrators are trying to steal back their ‘stolen’ possession. You don’t need me to tell you the consequences – you’ve been living them and consider yourself fortunate because they killed others, but not as many as they want you to believe.

Had Mr. Trump resisted his compulsory experts initially, he would have been removed with the 25th Amendment and the world as you know it would have ended FOREVER. If he deferred and played it to the letter of the law, which he has, they would seek to wreck everything he accomplished, which they did, and it almost worked; right up until they got caught.

The adverse forces that Mr. Trump has been able to withstand at the same time he worked to rebuild a broken and corrupt country presents a remarkable scenario; truly remarkable and historically worthy.

What people don’t understand; however, is that in so doing, he keenly managed an act of war without firing a single shot; and he did that against our chief economic, military and political rival. Domestic enemy combatants conspiring with foreign nations to import highly virulent bio-weapons of mass destruction into America for the express purpose of removing a sitting President and overthrowing the US government is most certainly an act of war. Thinking otherwise is again naive. Beware of China recognizing this and attempting to flip the script by rattling the war sabres. It’s already happening.

Instead, Mr. Trump sagely decided to braid a rope from the strands of impeachment, treason and war, which he then cleverly handed to his political enemies for them to hang themselves.

The virus – bio-engineered and weaponized to achieve political objectives – is as real as the people whom sadly lost their lives in this travesty. The rest of it; however, is FRAUD.

The only thing remaining for you is determining whether the case has been made for treason.

Yes it has.

I wrote this more recently on 21 May 21 in an article entitled Standing on the Truth and Staring World War III in the Face,

So where do we stand? Where do Americans realistically and objectively find ourselves 121 days into the Biden/Harris administration?

The answer presents in two basic and plausible ways as best it can be interpreted, understood and applied:

1) As Commander-in-Chief, an outgoing President Trump fulfilled his sworn Constitutional onus to defend the Republic against all enemies foreign and domestic and therefore he took any and all necessary steps to effectively advise military leadership accordingly. This would include the delineation of a commenced and asymmetrical World War III begun by leveraging biowarfare by means of launching of a bio-WMD (as classified by the FBI) against the U.S. This would include the objectives of infiltrating the America’s institutions writ large for the purpose of removing a sitting president to overthrow the U.S. government. Logically this advisement occurred prior to the 2020 election and even possibly leveraged the newly minted U.S. Space Force in response. Therefore, we would find ourselves resting in a state with a divided government where the military recognizes President Trump while the Congress and Judiciary recognize President Biden. This division

-OR-

2) We are in real trouble likely facing the end of America and the beginning of Amerika.

For the sake of the dialogue, let’s further define “real trouble” as the Biden/Harris administration being installed by China and the CCP by leveraging COVID-19 as a bio-WMD and with Biden, as a placeholder, proxy and pawn, serving both them and Obama and the Deep State/Shadow Government. Thus far, Biden has functioned largely by means of an unprecedented level of executive orders despite possessing all three requisite components to pass legislation constitutionally – the Democrats posses the Executive and both chambers of Congress. It all means that the United States has been flipped right back over to this broader and long-tenured plan that is playing out as a de facto Obama third term.

Actually, if all had gone according to plan, it would be a Hillary Clinton second term and Amerika would look much different than it does today; and not for the better. Even worse, that’s given how utterly shitty and contemptible the state of Amerika is right now. All of it has led to this, which is my new favorite mantra – “Amerika is a shit hole banana republic. All of the good banana republics are laughing at us.”

How frightened would Americans be if they had a full grasp of what I’ve been outlining for a long time, now? Would their stance towards Biden, COVID-19, masks, vaccinations and – most importantly – President Trump all change if they demonstrated fulsome comprehension of the actual status quo? Americans are largely feeble-minded sheep easily herded up by the powers that be so if they were to shift their focus away from MSM news to the truth, then the answer becomes, “hell yes” – they’d be scared shitless. Perhaps that’s what they need so share this far and wide.

If we could only inject the masses with a solid foundation of civics, accurate information and the ability to apply it objectively to the facts and circumstances (as outlined here and in the full body of Moonshine work).

There is only one logical and accurate explanation describing the situation in which the U.S. finds itself, it embraces Occam’s razor and it’s now a redundant message – we’ve been in the midst of an asymmetrical and undeclared war since China released a bio-WMD against the world in October 2019; and specifically targeting the U.S.

Today’s headlines are littered with that implicit rhetoric and messaging if viewed through an appropriate lens to parse it out.

We’re in the midst of a World War III that no one can see and it matters not why most Americans can’t get past the barrier, see through the obvious propaganda and make their way to the truth.

It only matters that they come to see the truth and see it soon.

-End-

Obama’s Third Term

Much of my work dating back to the spring and summer of 2020 featured some of the most intentionally aggravating, visceral, toxic and divisive language applicable to the U.S. geopolitical landscape. Words like sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT litter my articles, appear in their headlines and draw-down on the nation’s first black president, who served for two terms, in Barack Obama. That said, we all know who his vice president was.

THE WORK & THE WORDS

Building a case against Obama and characterizing him and those under the Obama umbrella with words like sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT was done divorced from my own visceral dislike of Obama rather, the case was and is being made entirely on the bulk of the evidence as delivered by research, findings and analysis.

The scathing and severely inflammatory rhetoric driving the reporting all occurred well beyond the point that I could factually demonstrate that the COVID-19 pandemic was “fake” and leveraged a real and bio-weaponized virus to drive a false flag political construct by propagating fraudulent infection and mortality data harvested from an average of 4.0 co-morbidities. The work was exclusive in many ways and without question, as controversial and conspiratorial sounding as it gets.

How something sounds and how it is; however, are two different things and Americans struggle reconciling dynamics like this.

The work and positions, which I share openly and without reservation at the right times, has had significant negative consequences relative to employment, family, friends, neighbors, colleagues, relationships, etc. The word “crazy” gets used often and it queues up folks for attacks. Just ask Lin Wood.

The point in all of this is a simple one. Although the work occurred while I was still essentially cutting my teeth writing and subsequent stylistic changes are notable, the stylistic word choice wasn’t stylistic at all. Rather, it was a coincidental reflection of the evidence.

Evidence and evidence alone delivered sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT relative to Obama and relative to his ilk.

Given the accuracy of these terms, it’s tragically unfortunate that many Americans still consider such accusations to be entirely antithetical to personal conventions and to what they perceive to be Americanism. What this cohort of Americans – and it’s a large one – fails to realize; however, is that in order to be a true American, one must thoroughly, independently and accurately exercise ones onus of civic duty and this requires vetting reporting and leveraging reliable sources to arrive at the truth.

That last bit is where Americans tend to fail miserably. This is also where drinking your Moonshine can be beneficial in lieu of swilling the Deep State’s elixir and chasing it with the MSM’s Kool-Aid.

So, terms like sedition, treason, traitor and SHADOW GOVERNMENT all apply with full force due to evidence; not opinion or stylistic choices.

OBAMA TOLD US SO

As if it’s an aspect of the unwritten rules framing the game of Deep State revolutions, treason and world wars, it seems the players are occasionally required to tip their hand and with this collective cohort of snarky smart-asses deserving of a fist full of knuckles and the subsequent spitting of teeth, they embrace symbolism, coded messages and even direct messages shrouded with something like projection, humor, sarcasm, etc.

Don’t miss the boat or be fooled. Although these miscreants may appear otherwise, but what they’re often telling you is exactly what they will be, are and have been doing.

Do you remember what Obama said at his farewell speech? He said the Constitution was just a piece of parchment. He said that he wasn’t going anywhere. He said that he would be right there with us for all of his remaining days.

Obama was the first U.S. president to assume this type of post-presidency position and to not seclude into private life to customarily and quietly live-out his remaining days.

Was there a reason for that? Yes. Obama wasn’t done serving as president or, in other words, ruling over you, me and everyone else.

What did Obama tell Stephen Colbert during his interview in late 2020?

He said he wished that he had a frontman (we call that a proxy.) He said he wished he could rule from his basement and away from the limelight as someone with an earpiece could do his bidding. We call that a SHADOW GOVERNMENT and it equates to OBAMA’S THIRD TERM.

This is NOT a video to skip over to keep reading.

SHADOW GOVERNMENT (from Spring 2020)

That video is a perfect exemplar of where the United States finds itself and this should terrify anyone with a modicum of common sense. How do we know this? Because Obama told us so.

OBAMA’S THIRD TERM began taking shape immediately after Hillary Clinton’s unexpected (un-rigged) 2016 loss and as I’ve demonstrated, documented and explained copiously and repetitively; it generally followed a rough course of Flynnn, Russia, Mueller, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, a fraudulent insurrection, impeachment 2.0 and then Biden’s inauguration, which was anomalously early by about 13 minutes. Characterizing this, we could term it a series of political constructs resting on a single political continuum.

The coronation event marking the successful removal of a U.S. president and the overthrow of the U.S. government was Biden’s inauguration (installation) as an China/Obama proxy. That contention envelops the notion that by design, Biden is only a placeholder and temporary while the actual objective of the construct is to seat a failed but preferred presidential candidate in Obama foot soldier Kamala Harris. In fact, I have repeatedly warned that all of this is an effort to bring a failed candidate (and foot solider in Harris) through the back door.

Something I have repeatedly gotten wrong on the occasions I have tried it is predictive timing and truthfully, it’s why I try to refrain from it. As the resident genius existing in the backdrop of the Moonshine effort always reminds us, “predicting the future is fucking hard.”

Don’t get me wrong. I’ll predict an event as going to occur when evidence indicates that it is the most logical and likely outcome. Last summer’s riots were predicted in precisely this fashion and by about 3 weeks. What I did not do; however, is attach a date to it.

Predictions and predictive timing are related but different. Establishing predictive dates is fool’s gold and normally doesn’t end well but foreseeing something before it happens is how we make Moonshine.

For my nickel, the bookend date on this treasonous continuum was a hard-one it was inauguration day. Understand that this isn’t predictive timing with a date assignment but rather a position related to constitutional authority and who possesses it.

An easy way to say it would be this – if the election and the presidency can’t be protected while the president is in power, how can it be once he’s out of power? Who in their right mind believes that after being duped in 2016 that the Deep State/Democrats would ever misstep again to forego their power and authority and allow someone other than their own proxy to occupy the Oval Office? No one, that’s who.

My positions never included President Trump ceding power to this treasonous and criminal international cabal on inauguration day and logical deduction was the hitch in my get along. I just couldn’t make it work. Yes, I understood the strategic angles, which I contemplated deeply and for a long time, but I couldn’t make it work logically whereby President Trump would cede his Title II authority; ergo his role as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer and Commander in Chief, and still be positioned to effectively save the Republic.

So, inauguration day was a firm stop for me, I got it wrong and here we are. I’m glad we’re here.

Aside from missing on the timing, though, the rest is precisely and deadly accurate analysis.

More recently, what did Obama tell us?

In a piece from The Gateway Pundit, Obama said this (emphasis mine),

I think that what we’re seeing now, is Joe and the administration are essentially finishing the job,” he said in an interview with New York Times columnist Ezra Klein. “And I think it’ll be an interesting test. Ninety percent of the folks who were there in my administration, they are continuing and building on the policies we talked about…”

Obama expressed his frustration that former President Donald Trump’s administration interrupted his ability to get credit for the strength of the economy.

“That clouds what I think would have been a more impactful shift in political views towards Democrats as a result of my presidency,” he said.

Barack Obama

When Obama entered office in January of 2009 he promised to fundamentally change America. In order to do so, he was placed into this generational political continuum as the set-up man for the closer, Hillary Clinton.

When forces of good interceded on the 2016 election to “un-rig” it for the historic Trump victory, the underlying plan driving the continuum was converted to a responsive contingency plan and you know the rest of the story, which I have and continue to outline ad nauseam: Flynnn, Russia, Mueller, impeachment 1.0, COVID-19, the stolen 2020 election, a fraudulent insurrection, impeachment 2.0 and then Biden’s inauguration, which was anomalously early by about 13 minutes.

What remains is whether or not President Trump and the military cohort responsible for “un-rigging” the 2016 election are still operational relative to 2020.

In the fallout of the fraudulent insurrection and the illegitimate inauguration, I left that door slightly ajar. Our work from yesterday widens it even more so yes, there is now a building tide of momentum that President Trump will return to office by August. Now, it seems, there is light shining through that more widely open door.

Upon entering office, he told us that he was going to fundamentally change America and 134 days into OBAMA’S THIRD TERM, he’s continues to work in closing in on the objective.

I suppose the only thing that stands in the way of this coming to fruition is President Trump’s SECOND TERM. Tick-tock, tick tock.

-End-

COVID Carve-out II – The Long Knives Are Out for #FalseFlagFauci

President Donald Trump possess and leverages two modi operandi – he traps his enemies inside of their own constructs forcing them to march to their own deaths sans an exit except for the path forward and, more recently, he remains removed, quieter and as operates from behind the scenes.

Today’s discussion assumes that upon his departure from office in January 2021, President Trump left in his wake a covert military-based plan devised to reverse course on the stolen 2020 election, the overthrow of his administration and the subsequent broader overthrow of the U.S. government; and all at the hand of China, including the installation of a Chinese proxy in Joe Biden. Of course, all of this is occurring with in the context of an asymmetrical and undeclared World War III to which most Americans appear oblivious.

Therein, we find both modi operandi in effect – Trump forcing his enemies to march forward and navigate a landscape of terminal pitfalls while from the backdrop, he quietly leverages foot soldiers to do his bidding. After all, optics are critically important and there is no other way than for this to be a movement of state governments, the people and the military; the latter of which will factor in once the current illegitimate government is excised from the fabric of this nation like the cancerous and treasonous tumor it is.

A week ago, I delineated the emerging carve-out that is being constructed as the exit strategy from this patently demonstrable false flag political construct we call COVID-19 and that piece is should be consumed for comprehending what follows.

In it, I described the carve-out,

The carve-out permits China to use a fraudulent narrative to characterize as “accidental” and fully compartmentalize the culpability for an asymmetrical strike; a strike that is comprised of an act of war by means of the the release of a bio-WMD. It was an act of war designed to launch a fraudulent pandemic devised to begin the destruction of America from the inside-out.

In so doing, this carve-out will attribute China’s asymmetrical bio-warfare strike to a narrative of fraudulent lab sloppiness permitting China to further enshroud its broader construct that included leveraging a deep and broad infiltration of America’s institutions to remove a sitting U.S. president, overthrow the U.S. government and insert a Chinese proxy into the White House in Joe Biden.

This carve-out will also permit China to directly control the narrative, which answers a question some readers are sure to have – Why would China assume responsibility for the release of the bio-WMD (they won’t call it that but the FBI did)?

By assuming responsibility for the “leak” from it’s CCP/PLA WIV, China removes the U.S. from the dialogue and positions itself to take a full and commanding lead in controlling the narrative as it explains exactly how the “leak” occurred. Within this explanation, China can fabricate whatever story line and evidence it needs to serve it accordingly and it will do so with the WHO (and the CDC, NIH, NIAID) in its back pocket and with the U.S. otherwise left impotent. Those entities are sure to toe the Chinese company line.

Unsurprisingly, the central piece to the carve-out and a foundational component of my focus since January of 2020, has been Anthony Fauci. This Fauci carve-out is now manifesting writ large and others are beginning to piece it together; this being one example.

Between these two carve-out articles the Fauci emails dropped as a rather significant confirmation of the position and several of them are provided at the bottom for independent consumption.

Recent developments entailing the apparent dispatching of Florida Governor Ron Desantis provides for a clearer picture of the current landscape and, when combined with the developments of Fauci’s forthcoming fall and a report from the New York Times’ Maggie Haberman, for the first time in a treacherous long time, there is legitimate, tangible evidence suggesting hope and promise for America.

BREITBART

It shapes up as Trump having dispatched Desantis to begin the undoing of Fauci as a circle back from Trump’s previous compartmentalization of the entirety of the COVID-19 pandemic with the Fauci/Pence cohort; the latter whom Trump appointed to lead the broader federal response. This occurred during a legendary April 2020 press conference and I have hammered this point over and over as essentially everyone else missed it.

Reasonably, this left the Deep State Democrats in a position to be responsive to that development, which they most certainly knew was coming.

Therefore and for them, it makes complete sense for Fauci to be made to bear the brunt of it all; serving as the de facto fall guy. Critically and in a way imperative for full understanding, this would simultaneously begin to lay an exit path for the Biden Administration and logical thought has those talking points already written and ready to go for the MSM.

On his way out and likely in some perverse sense of martyrdom, Fauci will continue to toe the Chinese company line. All of his talking points and dialogue are sure to be in alignment with: 1) the Chinese proxy Biden administration’s newly minted investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and its findings, as recently announced by Biden himself, 2) the WHO’s investigative findings to which Biden was initially inclined to accept; perhaps until he realized that by doing so the U.S. would lose a seat at the narrative writing table, 3) the emerging narrative that China will accept attribution for the genesis of SARS-CoV-2, 4) that it was due to internal lab sloppiness, 5) which caused a “leak” and 6) more. A lot more.

China is no rookie in this game, so expect the Biden narrative to be part and parcel with the tactics of disinformation/misinformation. This will require China taking hits inside the Biden narrative to lend credence to the messaging. Kool-Aid drinking, elixir slurping narrative consumers will find it tasty and satisfying as they continue to shout “orange man bad!”

Importantly, take note that the U.S. gain of function research Desantis references is old information – real old – and so are Fauci’s entanglements in it. We’ve been hashing that out for what feels like decades now but in actuality, for over a year.

All of this makes Desantis’ timing here very deliberate and purposeful.

The timing of this Desantis attack, as underpinned by the notion that Desantis is a Trump foot soldier – see the pandemic response in his state and look at DJT’s zip code – is worthy of marking on a timeline. This is because it marks a fundamental shift in the status quo and the beginning of Trump’s reversal of course to go on the attack and begin that at the logical starting point – the undoing of Fauci.

If one can effectively yank the Fauci thread, the whole thing begins to unravel and that can be taken all of the way back to at least George H.W. Bush.

The Desantis attack would not be occurring outside of some very deliberate, specific and purposeful objective. Moreover and as indicated, Desantis’ dispatch in the role of a foot soldier comports exactly with Trump’s MOs.

Other developments also scaffold our positions in this and we anchor down with dialogue (tweet) from the NYT’s Maggie Haberman for full understanding,

““Trump has been telling a number of people he’s in contact with that he expects he will be reinstated by August” adding “(no that isn’t how it works but simply sharing the information),” Haberman wrote in a quote tweet of a video of a CNN segment.”

Maggie Haberman (NYT)

Why is a staunch Trump adversary like Haberman driving a message that Trump will return in August at this particular point in time? Why does the timing comport with the powers that be situating the central figure of Fauci as the fall guy?

Why is all of this happening against the backdrop of President Trump moving to shutter his new communications page? Is it because such communications will be unnecessary relative to August when he inherits back the Oval Office and the White House press room? It sure seems it.

ZERO HEDGE

For a brief sidebar and just to juice up the conversation, one can dump even more fuel onto the established fire by factoring in Arizona, Pennsylvania and the rest of the state election audits slated and queued up like cars on a Trump train and set and ready to deliver; and all on the same exact timeline.

Is 2021 the year of the boomerang?

For even more backdrop to the timing and developments here, we can further examine the Fauci carve-out by considering the perspective of a U.S. federal whistleblower working in conjunction with Lin Wood (and, in ways that exceed words, with an enormous sense of gratitude, appreciation and thanks for Mr. Wood and his recent support of the efforts at Political Moonshine.)

A fundamental shift is occurring and the long knives are out for#FalseFlagFauci. The messaging from both sides is changing.

On the way out is Fauci, COVID and eventually the entire Biden administration and all of those who participated in his treasonous installation.

On the way in is the President who never left – Donald John Trump.

Somewhere in between, we all sprint to latch on to hope and promise for the future of America.

I’ll leave you with some of the more important #FalseFlagFauci emails below for your independent consumption along with a promise for an article covering them soon.

-End-

SOURCES: ONE TWO THREE

Follow the Money

Did China yank the central cog of corruption out of the old Obama-era Globalist crime network and install that retread in the White House for 2020 to resume old operations and begin new ones? With a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the realities of the U.S. geopolitical landscape – not those proffered in the MSM – as overlaid by an honest and accurate account of COVID-19 as an undeniable false flag political construct leveraging a real and bioweaponized virus to underpin a pandemic resting entirely on a foundation of propagated fraudulent data, one can determine that there is no other plausible answer to this question than, “yes.”

[Author’s Note: Working alone, this massive article has currently only undergone a first round of proofing so apologies for any errors.]

That’s precisely what China did. The Obama bag man Joe Biden and is now China’s bag man and he’s on point to resume moving money relative to all of the seedy, shady and treasonous deals that has this Republic on the way out and China and the CCP’s brand of totalitarian, communist Marxism on deck.

What about the money, though? How are all of these corrupt, criminal and treasonous Globalists moving the money? I think it’s deeply complex and within a behemoth network that can be simply described as Globalists using private equity deals in the legitimate energy sector as a conduit to illegitimately move money relative to their crimes. Capturing the full scope of this nebulous construct and assembling the evidence cogently to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt is far beyond the scope of reason for a singleton without access to those investigative tools and resources.

THE STATUS QUO

Unfortunately and in a manner that seems to have most Americans oblivious to it and perhaps because public education has failed to inculcate them with the requisite set of independent and critical thinking skills just as it has failed to provide a robust and accurate foundation of civics to which those skills can be applied, this terrifying dynamic goes unseen by most. With no break in the momentum of the status quo, it will be far too late by the time it is realized unless something occurs to upend things positively; like an August Trump reinstatement, as the NY Times is now beginning to report.

This dynamic frighteningly situates the U.S. in the midst of an asymmetrical and undeclared World War III as underpinned by the Chinese infiltration of U.S. institutions writ large and commenced by the launch of a bio-WMD devised to initiate the first strike so as to remove a sitting president, overthrow the U.S. government and install a Chinese proxy in Biden. My shiny nickel rests squarely on the bet of Biden taking a dive in this war.

Quick Sidebar: China is a nightmare of an adversary and they are of the highest order in terms of capabilities and effectiveness – just look around you. In this regard and solely on the merits of maintaining appropriate levels of respect for ones adversaries, I hold China the highest of regards here and tip my hat to them accordingly. I digress.

Like I said – it’s a terrifying dynamic.

Our discussion today is launched by two things but ultimately, it falls back on old work in the vein of future proves past. A recent DOJ press release links us to the old work while a message from one of the individuals in the backdrop of Political Moonshine, who possess a particular and contextually expert skill set that is driven by an unrivaled intellect. The two combine to set our table in private equity and energy.

SETTING THE TABLE

Private equity and energy are not new to our discussion table as I’ve spent untold sums of hours figuratively chasing Joe Biden all over the globe and all relative to what I believe to be crime, corruption, bribery, blackmail, money laundering, kickbacks, etc. Are they using energy to move money? That’s what I think and care to establish.

It also has all of our eggs in the energy sector basket while acknowledging that plenty other baskets exist. In the eyes of a fraud investigator and reverting back to being a 70s-80s, free-range kid and BMX rat (at that age, your rig was your prized and only real valuable possession!), it looks something like this (thanks to Mongoose’s mag wheel).

Statecraft entails all of these treasonous criminals being locked into a sort of playing field and more broadly it’s the geopolitical landscape as it manifests nationally and extends internationally. In a game, there is an arena, a playing surface, players and officials to enforce rules. This analog works well to help explain many vectors including how the energy sector may be (is?) the interface for rampant international fraud, corruption and crime; or so I think.

In our case here, we have the energy sector (arena); finance and private equity (the playing surface); politicians, energy officials and energy finance entities (players); and regulators and law enforcement (officials) to enforce regulations and laws (rules.)

In an organization chart, which is what I roughly outlined above, the energy sector is thrust to the center to become the launch point for investigative work.

This overall dynamic forces the players to play inside of a box that is restrictive with firm boundaries. This box dictates the nature of the engagements inside of it and those leave discoverable but limited evidence behind. Finding it is tedious, arduous and impossible to completely and effectively do without access to the right information and investigative tools, neither of which I (nor any other civilian) have.

At this point, it should be noted that the following broader position on the role of the energy sector was identified and developed while initially examining Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine back around the same time a lot of folks were. My work caused me to believe that the Ukraine matter was not isolated but rather it represented the mapping over of a particular type of construct that was occurring in locations the globe over. That’s how these people operate.

Doing that work, I got suspended from Twitter and later lost (backed-up) some substantial content on Biden and Ukraine when things really began to boil over in the MSM. We take that censorship as confirmation.

THE PREMISE

Our premise contends that evidence may demonstrate a wide swath of crime and corruption and including but not limited to the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations, the stolen election, the removal of a sitting president, the overthrow of the U.S. government and the installation of a Biden Chinese proxy, all converges into an overarching construct functioning as a continuum. Picture a river flowing in one forceful direction with all of its interlaced tributaries merging, diverging, crossing-over and eventually terminating, but ultimately moving to one end for an explicit purpose.

On this continuum, the energy sector was/is being used as a legitimate conduit to illegitimately move money. Therein, energy partnerships, private equity deals, multilateral cooperation, the contextual merger of national governments and corporations, etc., all serve to facilitate crimes like fraud, money laundering, bribery, blackmail, kickbacks, etc. (think RICO).

As noted, it is important to note that the work here is limited by available open resources and because the broader structure to all of this is immensely burdensome, complex and expansive. Therefore, recapitulating and/or describing a lot of existing work and linking those articles for independent consumption and deeper understanding will be our best option to save space in this otherwise enormous article.

What follows is well short of any level of legal threshold for the evidentiary burden. Rather, the work is better characterized as descriptions of observations against a backdrop of “knowns” to which logical deduction is being applied to formulate positions.

Our wheel analog provides a good means for explaining how the work was conducted. Beginning at the hub of our wheel (energy sector), I ran down many of the spokes (Biden and international co-cospirators) to examine where, how and why those spokes interlaced and terminated at the rim (Globalist network).

BACKDROP TO ENTANGLEMENTS: BIDEN, ENERGY & ENERGY SECURITY

Biden’s wrangling up of the energy sector began under Obama’s first term. This next finding only contributes circumstantially and anecdotally, but it demonstrates the draw back to and direction of Obama/BIden relative to energy. From the Department of Energy (emphasis mine),

Adam Sieminski was sworn in on June 4, 2012, as the eighth administrator of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). From March 2012 to May 2012, while awaiting confirmation as EIA administrator, Mr. Sieminski served as senior director for energy and environment on the staff of the National Security Council. From 2005 until March 2012, he was the chief energy economist for Deutsche Bank, working with the Bank’s global research and trading units. Drawing on extensive industry, government, and academic sources, Mr. Sieminski forecasted energy market trends and wrote on a variety of topics involving energy economics, climate change, geopolitics, and commodity prices.

From 1998 to 2005, he served as the director and energy strategist for Deutsche Bank’s global oil and gas equity team. Prior to that, from 1988 to 1997, Mr. Sieminski was the senior energy analyst for NatWest Securities in the United States, covering the major U.S. international integrated oil companies.

He also had acted as a senior adviser to the Energy and National Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a nonpartisan policy think tank in Washington, DC. He is a senior fellow and former president of the U.S. Association for Energy Economics, and served as president of the National Association of Petroleum Investment Analysts.

In 2006, Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman appointed Mr. Sieminski to the National Petroleum Council (NPC), an advisory group to the secretary of energy, where he helped author the NPC’s Global Oil and Gas Study: The Hard Truths.

In addition to his affiliation with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, he was also an advisory board member of the Global Energy and Environment Initiative at Johns Hopkins University/SAIS. He had also served as chairman of the Supply-Demand Committee of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, and as an advisory member of the Strategic Energy Task Force of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is a member of the Washington, DC, investment professional society, and holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation. He received both an undergraduate degree in civil engineering and a master’s degree in public administration from Cornell University.

EIA Duties

EIA is responsible for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policy-making, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment. EIA provides a wide range of information and data products covering energy production, stocks, demand, imports, exports, and prices. EIA also prepares analyses and special reports on topics of current interest.

How helpful would that guy be if you were looking to exploit the energy sector fraudulently? A laughably rhetorical question.

Examine how the highlighted aspects about Adam Sieminski (formerly at EIA/DOE) directly overlay our work here and in precisely all of the right areas. It even includes ties to John’s Hopkins (COVID-19). He presents as a Deep State fixer but my speculation on him is just informed conjecture. He served from 2012-2017, though, which overlays our precise timeline, so I’d love to see him on the stand because I bet he knows a lot. I also bet there are plenty more just like him.

How about Sieminski’s ties to Deutsche Bank? The same Deutsche Bank that gave up records on Trump last August around the same time that the CDC revised away 94% of it’s bulk mortality and infection data that were used to justify the federal issuance (for state, county and local enforcement [federalism]) of COVID mitigations and guideline? Revisions that left only 6% of the data valid and reverting actual mortality right back to smack dab in the middle of a generally regular flu season? Deflection strategy? Hey, look here, not there!?

Digressing and as Bloomberg reported at the time (emphasis mine),

Deutsche Bank AG handed over detailed records related to dealings with U.S. President Donald Trump’s family business after receiving a subpoena from prosecutors last year, the New York Times reported.

The subpoena demanded documents that Trump and the Trump Organization had provided to the lender, the newspaper reported, citing four people familiar with the matter. The German firm complied, turning over records including financial statements and other materials it had received as Trump sought loans, the paper said.

It’s part of an investigation by New York prosecutors into the president’s business affairs, the paper said. The lender has worked with Trump for two decades, providing him and his company with more than $2 billion in loans, the Times reported.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. suggested in a court filing earlier this week that his office may be investigating potential bank and insurance fraud by the Trump Organization. He asked a federal judge on Monday to throw out the president’s latest effort to block a subpoena for documents from his accounting firm, Mazars USA LLP.

Spokespeople for Deutsche Bank and Vance’s office declined to comment on the reported subpoena when contacted by Bloomberg. A representative for the Trump Organization didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.

More on Deutsche Bank from CNN Business (emphasis mine),

New York (CNN Business) The private bankers responsible for lending to President Donald Trump and Jared Kushner have resigned from Deutsche Bank, the bank said.

“Rosemary Vrablic and Dominic Scalzi have tendered their resignations to Deutsche Bank effective as of year-end, which was accepted by the bank,” Daniel Hunter, a spokesman for the bank said in a statement.

Vrablic and Scalzi have worked closely together for years since joining Deutsche Bank a decade ago. Vrablic was a trusted contact to the Trump Organization and Kushner and assumed the bank’s lending relationship with Trump in the private side of the bank after the commercial lending division stopped doing business with Trump.

Deutsche Bank (DB) has loaned the Trump Organization more than $300 million.

It’s as much political projection (fraud?) as it is the usual bullshit from the usual suspects.

It gets worse for Deutsche Bank, though. Consider this which is extracted from my previous work,

“What is reasonably thought to have been a professional hit has occurred targeting federal Judge Esther Salas, who was just appointed to the Epstein/Deutsche Bank case two days before. Tragically, it resulted in the wounding of the judge’s husband, Mark Anderl, and the killing the couple’s 20-year-old son, Daniel Anderl.

This example is a mere sip from an ocean of evidence and representative of the breadth, depth and complexity I offer warning about in all of this. It only continues to get more complex; way more complex.

For more context going forward, this an extract from the article referenced below, that is pretext which Joe Biden established on 22 Nov 14 at the Atlantic Council Energy and Economic Summit in Istanbul.

There he said (emphasis mine,)

“First is a new development, the use of corruption and oligarchy-kleptocracy as a tool of international coercion (interesting word choice, Joe.) Second, is use of energy as a weapon, undermining the security of nations. Global energy security is a vital part of America’s national security. In East Asia, President Obama and President Xi just signed a historic agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the United States has launched an initiative to double the access to electric power. We call is Power Africa. And in the Caribbean and Central America, our administration has launched a new, regional energy strategy to help boost sustainable economic growth and diversity of energy sources. (Look out for Haiti/Carribean and Africa below – I tie them back, too.)

Note the nexus between Presidents Xi and Obama relative to the context of using energy as a “weapon.” Note how energy overlaps locations that bear down in other story lines like human sex trafficking and vaccination research.

Note reference to global energy security because it’s critical. We know what happens when these people change the rules or rewrite them.

What about the referenced overlap to vaccination research angles? Yes, the Bidens were caught between COVID-19, vaccination development, energy and China. I wrote an article on it entitled ‘CONVERGING LANDSCAPES: HOW THE BIDEN FAMILY FINDS ITSELF BETWEEN ENERGY CORRUPTION AND ANTI-MALARIA VACCINATION PROGRAMS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC‘, that ties back to our energy sector theory origins.

What about Biden running point on energy for Obama? There is nothing I could find in the way of a formal appointment of then Vice President Biden to an energy-specific post by Obama, but the Obama White House archives includes these as extracted directly from Biden’s page (emphasis mine) and note again the similar overlaps to other areas of interest; especially geographically,

Launched the Caribbean Energy Security Initiative in January 2015 and chaired the U.S.-Caribbean-Central America Summit in May 2016, which advanced the diversification and integration of the region’s energy sectors.

The Vice President has been a leading architect of the U.S. strategic vision of a Europe whole, free and at peace. During his time in the Senate, the Vice President led the effort to enlarge NATO to include the former Warsaw Pact countries of Eastern and Central Europe after the collapse of the Iron Curtain. The Vice President’s speech at the Munich Security Conference in February 2015 laid out a vision for how to revitalize NATO, strengthen democratic institutions in Europe, prioritize investments to bolster energy security, and grow trade and investment ties across the Atlantic. The Vice President has been leading the Administration’s effort to support a sovereign, democratic Ukraine, visiting the country three times in 2014.

Led U.S. efforts to focus on increasing European energy diversification and security.

Engaged regularly with King Abdullah to sustain our vital strategic partnership with Jordan and promote counterterrorism and energy cooperation with regional partners.

Even on then the Vice President’s own page, these statements were made,

“The Vice President’s speech at the Munich Security Conference in February 2015 laid out a vision for how to revitalize NATO, strengthen democratic institutions in Europe, prioritize investments to bolster energy security, and grow trade and investment ties across the Atlantic. The Vice President has been leading the administration’s effort to support a sovereign, democratic Ukraine, visiting the country three times in 2014. ”

Note how this ties contemporaneously to the current narrative to push Ukraine to join NATO as another incursion on Russia’s regional security and national sovereignty and note the context of SECURITY; and remember, these people are playing in a box – energy – and now ENERGY SECURITY is bearing down. I described it this way previously,

Let’s also not forget that China is leveraging these programs in part to infiltrate NATO, as outlined by the Lithuanians, and that the current drive from the Obama/Biden/Deep State is rekindling trouble (a coup under Obama/Clinton/Kerry) in Ukraine and pushing it to join NATO relative to NATO’s continued encircling of and pressure campaign on Russia (previously covered in Volume 8 of The Still.)

More from Biden on ENERGY SECURITY in the earlier article,

This is about energy security. To achieve it, Europe needs to ensure it diversifies its resources, its routes and its suppliers.”

More from my article, this hits on a monumentally critical component to understand, which I began emphasizing aboveENERGY SECURITY.

Overlaying our timeline on a 2014-2016 span, Obama leveraged a false flag construct and other means to rewrite U.S. SECURITY in another very important area – biosecurity rules. These changes preceded and permitted the export of gain of function research, which was being exposed by internal U.S. whistleblowers. The export destination was the Wuhan Lab of Virology in China. China/CCP/PLA was then aided with samples, proprietary knowledge and funding from Fauci’s NIH and elsewhere and specific to SARS-CoV-2.

So then, why did Biden arrange to place his hands on ENERGY SECURITY and in the precise locations where we are documenting all of this crime, corruption, fraud and treason; and where the locations for other sorts of documented and related crimes like human trafficking, possible vaccination research, etc. overlap?

What happens when these people change the rules? Rhetorical questions.

THE MESSAGE

Returning to the thrust of the article and starting with the message from my guy, we can see that he’s telling us that, for someone (can’t imagine Merrick Garland’s DOJ/FBI has an interest) with the requisite investigative resources, the evidence exists inside of private equity deals.

He also reminds us that Peter Schweitzer’s book ‘Secret Empires’ (I’ve yet to read it) lays a granular foundation for our quote here, which has been reproduced from the message and augmented to polish it up a bit for the article; but not in ways to change the content or meaning.

Bribery: Prime equity funds typically charge 2% of the assets under management and 20% of the profits when a deal is sold. They (Bidens) ran $1.5 billion deal (an energy deal with China, the CCP and the CEFC). There were 3 partners: Whitey Bulger’s nephew (James Bulger), John Kerry’s step son (Chris Heinz) and Hunter (Biden.) The 2% is annual.

Blackmail: I searched for the photos (derived from Biden’s controversial laptop) of Hunter with under age Chinese kids – and there were some horrifying ones – and they have since been scrubbed from the search engines – Bing, Google and even Duck Duck Go. There was one of him pressed up against kid that was no more than 12 years old and she was wearing fishnets and long pressed on fingernails. Can’t find any of them anywhere.

The Victim: It was a selfie he (Hunter) took (of the victim described above.) She was pressed between Hunter and what looked like a stripper pole. Her face had a look of absolute terror.

With quite a bit alleged in that quote, let’s focus on the empirical bits and for good reason.

Before we do, recall what it is we’re actually discussing and for the sake of clarity in the dialogue, we’ll consider some older work. First, let’s throw-down an empirical data point to demonstrate that we are justified in even having this dialogue.

IMPORTANT: REFERENCING THE DATES ABOVE, IT’S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE FIRST MSM NEWS ON THE SARS-CoV-2 OUTBREAK WAS 27 DEC 19. THE OUTBREAK WAS LATER REVISED BACKWARDS TO 17 NOV 19 AND THE FBI HAD KNOWLEDGE OF THE OUTBREAK AS EARLY AS OCTOBER 2019 ACCORDING TO ITS OWN TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE REPORT. THE FBI NEVER NOTIFIED TRUMP’S DOD OF IT OR THE RESPECTIVE NATIONAL SECURITY IMPLICATIONS DESPITE ITS OWN SELF-IMPOSED ONUS TO DO SO.

It’s this simple. In 2016 and upon exiting office (VPOTUS), Joe (and Jill) Biden’s income was $396,456.

For 2017-2019 and aligning on the same timeline as the deliberate release of a bio-WMD in Wuhan China; and dating back to October 2019 (as per the FBI); and as being first reported in the MSM on 27 Dec 19; the Biden’s income exploded exponentially to $16, 596,979.

Overall, that represents a 4086.34% increase in income for those 3 years combined; equating to an average annual increase in income of $5,532,326.33 at 1295.45%.

That change is what we call a hockey stick line statistically and it is a hallmark indicator of fraud, just like these hockey sticks were.

Where did that money come from? Private equity? Yes.

Suffice it say that we have $16 million dollars worth of room to make our assertions begin to stick within $1.5 billion dollar box. That’s a lot of room.

This is where the $1.5 billion dollar deal bears down greatest. The one that Hunter brokered with China/CCP/PLA/CEFC (the latter being a CCP energy company) after “THE BIG GUY” chauffeured him across the pond on Air Force 2; where upon landing, they split ways. Days later when they re-boarded AF2, the deal was in Hunter’s pocket right next to is crack pipe and his selfie-porn-generating device.

For shits, giggles and satisfaction, you can even take our timeline back to 05 Jan 17 and the Susan Rice memo; and even long before that; as in back to the 1960s and arguably, that’s not even the very beginning of it all.

It’s as simple as this – did this absurd increase in the Biden’s annual income flow into their accounts through energy sector and for the reasons I’ve outlined?

It’s time to follow the money and to begin that murky, convoluted and banal process, we’ll introduce the second point from above and it’s the DOJ press release, which I remarked on the other day.

Importantly, I think the easiest way to bring all of this together is to start with this most recent DOJ press release, show you what grabbed my my attention, draw it back appropriately and then walk you backwards through it all while linking you to the accompanying research along the way.

THE DOJ PRESS RELEASE

This introduces it.

The red flags in that were fairly obvious: money laundering, U.S. financial system, bribery, Brazil, world governments, global construction (think looming U.S. infrastructure bill and how infrastructure overlaps energy in so many places; each being a potential portal for fraud; and if you know anything about the construction industry…). All of that caught my attention.

Pay special attention to the concept of laundering money inside of the U.S. financial system because it comes to bear in light of two things: 1) someone would be needed to steer corruption through the U.S. system – was it Biden? and 2) closed and coveted financial systems require getting access to them (in other nations), which is accomplished by engaging with the political leaders in those countries.

What was contained in that press release that that really made me stand-up, though, was Odebrecht and here’s why.

ODEBRECHT

Odebrecht backs us up to a 26 Nov 19 article examining Biden relative to Ukraine. It was a build on work from the previous day that had identified a circular flow of money I characterized as: Obama/Biden <> Ukraine/Iran <>Iran/Ukraine <> Biden Obama. Ukraine and Iran factor in heavily in the research vectors and that work delivered Brazil and a bunch of other nations of which there are presumably more to identify.

We fall even further back on a 29-31 May 13 timeline where, in Brazil, Biden called for the “start of a new era of U.S.-Brazilian relations,” and of course energy is specifically central to it. You can consider that the launch point to a new era of crime and corruption to be contained within the rewrite for the “new era.”

Biden then stated (emphasis mine),

“On energy, we discussed how we can build a partnership that reflects the ambition of both our countries in this area.  As some of you know, two days ago, I spent time at your state-owned, and actually now private and state enterprise, going through a deep briefing on the promise of pre-salt oil that is immense.  The find is immense.”

Did you catch the reference to a “state-owned” energy firm? As in Brazil being the state, Biden partnering with the leaders of Brazil and specifically as it relates to energy and more specifically as it relates to a corrupt company that has an established history of corruption with politicians?

Grab a hold of “state-owned” because it will bear down as a constant much like biosecurity and energy security.

While Biden was in Brazil, he met with Petrobras.

What do we know about Petrobras? It’s an energy company owned by Odebrecht SA, our notoriously corrupt entity and whose CEO was arrested for corruption in 2015. 

Consider that Odebrecht was charged in July with corruption and money laundering and declined to respond to specific questions about the price fixing and political kickback case focused on state-run oil firm Petroleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras.

It gets worse. Consider the political element alone (emphasis mine), “Among dozens of executives under investigation for overcharging Petrobras on contracts and using the excess to bribe politicians, Odebrecht had an especially close relationship to former President Lula.

By 18 Jun 19, Odebrecht had filed bankruptcy. Doesn’t this all coincide with the same relative time-frame as Hunter Biden’s departure from Burisma?

Consider,

“Odebrecht and petrochemical company Braskem SA in 2016 struck parallel agreements with authorities in three countries to pay up to $4.5 billion, as part of the largest anticorruption settlement in history. Braskem is partly owned by Odebrecht and Petrobras.

The settlements with U.S., Brazilian and Swiss authorities spawned corruption probes in other Latin American countries where the two companies operate. Last month, Odebrecht filed for chapter 15 bankruptcy in the U.S. shortly after it filed for bankruptcy in Brazil in June.”

On 20 Nov 19, the DOJ issued a press release stating (emphasis mine),

“An indictment was unsealed today in federal court in Brooklyn charging Jose Carlos Grubisich, the former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Braskem S.A. (Braskem), a publicly traded Brazil-based petrochemical company, for his role in a massive bribery and money laundering scheme involving Braskem and its parent company, Odebrecht S.A. (Odebrecht). The scheme allegedly resulted in the diversion of hundreds of millions of dollars from Braskem to a secret slush fund used, in part, to pay bribes to government officials, political parties and others in Brazil to obtain and retain business. Grubisich, who also served as a member of the Board of Directors of Braskem, and in various capacities for Odebrecht, was charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), one count of conspiracy to violate the books and records provisions of the FCPA and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.”

Odebrecht, right? Understanding why I stood-up to the latest release from the DOJ?

According to the Brazil Business Council, BUSBC member companies, which includes Braskem, were present when Biden made his speech in Brazil. As stated, Braskem’s parent company is, Odebrecht. Braskem happens also to be the US’s largest domestic producer of polypropylene.

That places the corrupt parent company, by proxy vis-à-vis Braskem, in proximity of Biden at the time of his speech.

Joe Biden himself is the central cog of corruption linking the nations we’re mentioning here because on varying levels, he engaging with them all in the context of energy. Even so, some of the nations have their own bilateral arrangements and otherwise. We could easily take Biden’s spoke in our wheel diagram, make it a hub and build a wheel around him (actually, that’s what we’re doing in this article.)

FOLLOW THE MONEY

Let’s follow the money. Moving forward from the Ukraine, Iran, Brazil tangent used to establish the basis of our discussion to introduce the energy sector as a legitimate conduit to illegitimately move money, we arrive at a substantial article outlining Biden’s crimes. We focus our attention on the 2013 Hunter/China/CCP/PLA/CEFC $1.5 billion dollar deal in private equity and we do this with our stronger understanding of the energy sector conduit.

The CEFC China Energy Company, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2020, was a CCP owned and controlled energy company just much like Petrobras in Brazil. Remember, these criminals map the same constructs and schemes over different areas to commit the same crimes.

Patrick Ho, who is a Chinese Deep State asset, will bear down as the nexus between the CEFC, it’s chairman Ye Jianming, where Hunter Biden entered an agreement to serve as an “attorney.” Although Biden graduated from Yale Law School in 1996, he has no qualifications in energy.

These are extracts and images from previous work that help paint the picture.

More evidence of the Biden China deal emerged including these, which outlined previous revelations that the Bidens were charging fees of $10 million just for introductions to then Vice President Joe Biden.

This document above is notable due to its draw back on the CEFC, which factors-in the recently emerged Patrick Ho as cooperating with Rudy Giuliani in the Biden matters and at the behest of then President Trump.

In a leaked conversation, Hunter Biden describes Ye as “his partner” characterizing him as the richest man in the world and chairman of the CEFC, a private Chinese outfit to mysteriously appear in the Global Fortune 500 beginning in 2013. Here, it’s important to reflect back on what former Biden associate Tony Bobulinski recently stated and namely that the CCP serves as China’s political arm while the CEFC serves as its capitalist arm.

In other words, Hunter Biden’s $1.5 billion private equity deal is with the CCP’s capitalist arm.

It’s President Xi Jinping’s alignment with China’s “One Belt One Road” geopolitical and infrastructure development directive, which invests in foreign nations, that leverages the CCP political arm and CEFC economic arm and remember, I recently identified infrastructure as the means by which China intends to leverage its proxy to apply Chinese doctrine to America using the looming U.S. infrastructure bill.

It ties directly to One Belt One Road and half of that is energy – CEFC, the capitalist arm of the CCP.

The leaked conversation showed how it’s important to acknowledge the two the primary players in the CEFC – Chairman Ye Jianming, with whom Hunter Biden entered into an agreement to serve as his “personal attorney” and who he calls his “partner” in the deal; and Patrick Ho, who was, “the fucking spy chief of China,” as Hunter described him, and the individual responsible for founding the CEFC.

Curiously but not surprisingly, Biden and Ye only communicate in person. There are reasons for that and one of them is that the play inside of a box.

As this timeline moves forward, Ho had relatively recently disappeared; having been arrested and charged in the U.S.; only to reemerge as a cooperating witness in Rudy Giulani’s effort to expose The Biden Crime Family. Also, Ye was arrested by the CCP in March 2018. We can view Ye’s arrest as the CCP enveloping him to control the fall-out and damage for what I’m outlining here and more.

The leaked conversation also contains Hunter stating his concerns over Ye’s undetermined location relevant to a “$4 billion deal” to “build the fucking largest fucking LNG port (liquified natural gas) in the world.” Once again, there’s another natural gas point as referenced way back at the beginning.

Recapitulating the nature of the deal as succinctly as we can, we see that Hunter Biden was representing Ye, the CEFC chairman, as his personal attorney. On the weekend of 04 July 17, former CEFC director Zang Jian Jun and Xi met in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin and specifically discussed the purchase of one of the largest oil conglomerates in the world, the Russian corporation Rosneft. Hold on to Rosneft.

The deal being discussed was the purchase of a 14% share and Hunter put a $4 billion price tag on it. This deal is derived from the 2013 $1.5 billion Hunter deal and in it, Joe Biden, was represented by his son Hunter Biden in an arrangement where funding was earmarked for Joe in percentages and whereby he was compelling Hunter to forfeit to him half his salary in acting as the family bag man.

A state-owned Russian global oil conglomerate was being purchased and at this particular time, Russia was under Obama-imposed sanctions for it’s actions relative to the Ukraine and Russia’s capture of the Crimean Peninsula, which is home to its prized Black Sea Fleet (naval) in Sevastopol.

According to Bobulinski, $10 million dollars had been earmarked by CEFC to capitalize Sinohawk. Oneida Holdings was the shell firm designated to receive the funding, which never arrived and without any notice. From Bobulinski’s statement, he described it like this.

“I am the CEO of Sinohawk Holdings which was a partnership between the Chinese operating through CEFC/Chairman Ye and the Biden family. I was brought into the company to be the CEO by James Gilliar and Hunter Biden. The reference to “the Big Guy” in the much publicized May 13, 2017 email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden. The other “JB” referenced in that email is Jim Biden, Joe’s brother.”

Bobulinski gave special attention in his interview to delineate two tranches of $5 million funding each and he did so carefully. One tranche was earmarked for capitalization while the second was earmarked as a personal loan to the Biden familyA PERSONAL LOAN TO THE BIDEN FAMILY.

Returning to Rosneft from several paragraphs up, now consider this from the USA Today as we begin to drag-in familiar names that add to the complexity (emphasis mine),

The most troubling issue that (Christopher) Wray may face is the fact that his law firm — King & Spalding — represents Rosneft and Gazprom, two of Russia’s largest state-controlled oil companies.

Rosneft was prominently mentioned in the now infamous 35-page dossier prepared by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele. The dossier claims that the CEO of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, offered candidate Donald Trump, through Trump’s campaign advisor Carter Page, a 19% stake in the company in exchange for lifting U.S. sanctions on Russia. The dossier claims that the offer was made in July while Page was in Moscow.

Rosneft is also the company that had a $500 billion oil drilling joint-venture with Exxon in 2012, when Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was Exxon’s CEO. However, the deal was nixed by President Obama in 2014, when he imposed the sanctions that crippled Russia’s ability to do business with U.S. companies. The lifting of sanctions by the Trump administration would enable Exxon to renew its joint venture agreement with Rosneft, and the law firm of King & Spalding could end up in the middle of the contract negotiations between those two companies.

The law firm’s representation of Gazprom raises even more serious conflict issues for Wray. Gazprom was a partner in RosUkrEnergo AG (“RUE”), which is controlled by Ukrainian oligarch Dmitry Firtash. He is under federal indictment in Chicago for racketeering charges, has had numerous financial dealings with former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, and is generally considered to be a member of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.

Rosneft delivers Obama, sanctions, Ukraine, Paul Manafort, Russia, Putin, Exxon, former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, an enmeshed Christopher Wray, King & Spalding, Gazprom, the U.K., MI6, Christopher Steele, the Steele Dossier, Carter Page, FISA warrants, Donald Trump, an alleged bribe in private equity in the energy sector.

What are the chances we can link all of this William Barr and the stolen election while threading it through California politicians and directly back to China? Is it 100%? Yes it its.

Watch what happens.

Let’s tug on another state-owned energy company enmeshed with the Bidens. This is from another article and it references a DOJ press release from November 2020.

On Wednesday, the Department of Justice issued a press release that we began taking to task in the previous article, which is necessary backdrop for what follows. From that article, here’s a brief recapitulation of what the DOJ outlined.

According to the DOJ press release (emphasis added),

Natalino D’Amato, 61, of Venezuela, was charged in an 11-count indictment filed in the Southern District of Florida.  D’Amato was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, four counts of international money laundering, three counts of promotional money laundering, and three counts of engaging in transactions involving criminally derived property.

The indictment alleges that, beginning in January 2013 and continuing through December 2017, D’Amato conspired with others, including officials at joint ventures between PDVSA and various foreign companies in the oil-rich Orinoco belt of Venezuela, to launder the proceeds of an illegal bribery scheme to and from bank accounts located in South Florida.  These joint ventures were majority owned and controlled by PDVSA.  According to the indictment, D’Amato offered and paid bribes to numerous Venezuelan officials who worked at the PDVSA joint ventures in order to obtain highly inflated and lucrative contracts to provide goods and services to the PDVSA joint ventures.  The indictment further alleges that over the course of the conspiracy, companies controlled by D’Amato received approximately $160 million from the PDVSA joint ventures into accounts he controlled in South Florida.  According to the charges, D’Amato used a portion of those funds to make payments to or for the benefit of the Venezuelan officials.

Notably and importantly, this ties us back to the DOJ press release underpinning our discussion here and specifically, fraud and money laundering through Odebrecht and in the U.S. financial system, ergo Florida.

I warned you early that this was burdensome and complex and most importantly, incomplete by far.

We immediately grab on to the nature of the crimes and Venezuela and PDVSA, Venezuela’s “state-owned” energy company.

Doing so has falling back on old work,

The first order of business is finding entities resting in between the Bidens and those associated with the press release: Natalino D’Amato, Venezuela, South Florida and PDVSA.

To demonstrate the complexity here, consider the two primary corporations that link to the Biden crime family – Rosemont Seneca and Boahai HarvestBohai Harvest alone has 680 offshore entities, 101 officers, 12 intermediaries and 35 global locations that span Hong Kong, Luxembourg, Singapore, Jersey, Switzerland Guernsey, UK, Isle of Man, China, Panama, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Malta, Seychelles, Bahamas, and more.

Here is one example from Bohai Harvest’s 12 intermediaries that serves as an exemplar of how this all peels back like an onion and whereby each layer diverges like a spiderweb. In this case, Grand Harvest Consultants LTD depicts how each of the Bohai Harvest entities generates this type of hub and spoke map.

This type of hub and spoke map can be generated for each of the remaining 11 Bohai Harvest intermediaries and each of its 680 offshore entities and the 101 officers. For each of those, which totals 793 altogether, a hub and spoke map would be generated and each spoke would be run to its end point, which in turn would create another hub and spoke map. Rinse/repeat. You could do this for a very long time.

All of this would represent the tip of the iceberg and as you can see, it is a daunting task and so we stay cursory in our examination.

Thorough efforts to tie D’Amato directly to Biden were fruitless, as expected, and so it made sense to vector from known Biden interfaces: Bohai Harvest and Rosemont Seneca.

Starting there and vectoring back towards Venezuela, our focus naturally drew upon PDVSA (we assert that the Biden’s were leveraging energy markets and natural gas, specifically, to move money relative to their criminal enterprises) and PDVSA is state-owned [Venezuela], has Russian entanglements and ties to Dominion/Smartmatic by it’s state ownership [Venezuela.]

After several hours of work, the best laid evidence can be found in work that brings PDVSA to light relative to an established and known entity is Rosneft – Russia’s largest oil producer.

The entanglements are remarkable, no? They include Bohai Harvest, Rosemont Seneca, Venezuela, PDVSA, Russia, Dominion/Smartmatic and Rosneft.

Let’s pause, breathe for a moment and then give due diligence to a direct reference above that draws us back to specific names and entities introduced at the beginning.

Remember this from the message? “There were 3 partners: Whitey Bulger’s nephew (James Bulger), John Kerry’s step son (Chris Heinz) and Hunter (Biden.)”

Here’s the due diligence drawing us back on the Bidens, China, energy and private equity.

In 2013, two Chinese-registered asset managers (Bohai Industrial Investment Fund and Harvest Fund Management) founded BHR with two U.S. enties (Thornton Group LLC and Rosemont Seneca Partners.) The Chinese registered asset managers are Bohai Industrial Investment Fund Management as backed by BOC International Holdings and Harvest Fund Management as back by none other than Deutsche Bank (another draw-back).

Thornton Group was co- founded by James Bulger and Rosemont Seneca was founded by Devon Archer, Christopher Heinz, and Hunter Biden. A memorandum of understanding was signed to create the fund named BHR Partners, which was followed by the signing of contracts.

Picking back up and continuing from the same,

This is Rosneft.

Rosneft should sound familiar to you and we’re moving in that direction. What connects us to Rosneft is Hunter Biden (Joe Biden), China, the CCP, Patrick Ho and his entity, CEFC, which we first brought to your attention in March. The takeaway here to keep things succinct is viewing CEFC as the linkage between the Bidens and China ergo we draw down on how PDVSA may link to CEFC/China.

The following two extracts represent a tapestry of nexuses outlined in the source article that deeply enmesh Venezuela and PDVSA in all of this and ultimately right back to the Bidens and China.

06 Nov 19Geopolitical Monitor reported in October 2019 that “Russian media suggested that Russian energy conglomerate Rosneft has plans to consolidate Venezuela’s National Oil Company PDVSA (Petroleos de Venezuela) under Rosneft’s corporate structure in exchange for debt relief. This would seem to keep U.S., Canadian, and Mexican oil and natural gas firms from satisfying natural gas demand from non-OECD Asia. Additionally, it allows Moscow to use Rosneft’s acquisition of Venezuelan natural gas as a geopolitical coercion tool by acquiring a piece of some of the largest recoverable oil and natural gas reserves in the world. The Maduro regime will also need to navigate the $20-$60 billion in debt owed to ChinaWill the Chinese also have a stake in PDVSA? If so, how does that play into the current US-China trade negotiations? What these geopolitical decisions point to is a Rosneft-PDVSA merger that brings more questions than answers. Military troops and hardware were used to save the Assad regime, and now in Venezuela it will be oil, natural gas, and petrochemicals that gives Russia a solid foothold in the western hemispherePDVSA is one of the world’s most prolific oil companies with the largest extractable oil and gas reserves in the world – estimated at 300 billion barrels, and PDVSA’s estimated worth is “approximately $186 billion.”

08 Dec 19World Oil reports that a “subsidiary of Rosneft has taken over some contract discussions with local service providers in Venezuela, stepping in for PDVSA on joint projects with the state-owned oil company, according to people familiar with the matter; representing a major turnabout for PDVSA, which in the past typically operated all aspects of the joint ventures, said the people, who asked not to be named because the talks with the service providers aren’t public. Rosneft now trades much of Venezuela’s oil from an office in Panama staffed with former PDVSA employees. Rosneft receives oil as part of its joint ventures with PDVSA, and also as repayment for loans. It’s not subject to U.S. sanctions that restrict American refiners from importing Venezuelan crude.”

Moving on and relaunching from Venezuela with the idea that its state-owned energy company PDVSA may be a conduit to move money in the broader overarching construct, how else does the nation tie-in directly? Dominion-Smartmatic and the stolen 2020 election is the easy answer.

In addition to having funded the stolen election alongside China and Cuba and as per Sidney Powell, Venezuela was draws back on Hammer and Scorecard as interface for Dominion Smartmatic relative to stealing elections. This occurred in the contexts of both initial ownership and the utilization thereof so as to us guarantee “elections” for the Maduro regime.

This is from Powell’s Georgia filing.

Consider this from previous work and note the obvious tie backs,

Consider this from the Financial Times and take note of the countries named relative to the ones already outlined while also recognizing Mr. Trump’s primary motivation.

Here is a look at what prompted the US action, what it could mean for Venezuela and how Russia has reacted. Why has the US imposed sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil company, Rosneft? The Trump administration wants to force Mr. Maduro to step down and agree to fresh elections, as it considers his 2018 election victory fraudulent. Venezuela’s once wealthy economy has collapsed over the past four years, with GDP shrinking by more than two-thirds, but Mr Maduro has so far clung to power with the support of his key allies: Russia, CubaTurkey and China.

Venezuela and PDVSA are in – lock, stock and barrel.

Now watch.

We’ve already dragged-in Wray without sharing most of his background and that long article also enmeshes former Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, Mueller and others; so now watch me enmesh former Attorney General William Barr as deeply as it gets.

Did you know this about Barr? In 1974 he received his MA in government and Chinese Studies. Between 1973-1977, he served in the Central Intelligence agency. In 1990 he was Deputy AG to George H.W. Bush before becoming his AG. He has roots. Deep and specific roots and this is only a glimpse of his backdrop.

Most critically, Barr served law firm Kirkland & Ellis at a very specific time. Consider this from old work,

The last article focused on the timing and placement of Attorney General William Barr as it relates to Dominion Voting Systems, which is obviously at the heart of this stolen 2020 election. Therein, we discussed how the enigmatic Mr. Barr, after having served as AG previously when appointed by by George H.W. Bush, had returned to the private sector after he left the DOJ. I outlined his background in the All Holds Barred article wherein we learned that Barr had returned to work at Kirkland & Ellis in 2017.

It’s Kirkland & Ellis that binds Barr to Dominion Voting Systems as the firm guided its acquisition by Staple Street Capital during the time Barr was working at Kirkland & Ellis and before he left the firm to return to the DOJ for a second stint as AG and at the behest of President Donald J. Trump.

In order to do this and perhaps for fun, we must drag James Comey into this. Before entering the FBI, Comey was a known Clinton fixer and in 2013 was appointed .

On 30 Jan 13, Comey was appointed Director of HSBC Holdings effective 04 Mar 13. This overlaps Comey’s appointment as FBI Director spanning 04 Sep 13 to 09 May 17.

Now consider this from old work,

Staple Street Capital, which had acquired Dominion in 2018 and whereby AG William Barr had been positioned at Kirkland & Ellis, the law firm advising Staple Street on the acquisition. It’s also important to note here that HSBC Toronto managed to secure 18 different Dominion patents that represent the technical and functional capacity to effectively penetrate and manipulate US elections by means of Dominion/Smartmatic systems and software. HSBC is Chinese-owned ergo China bought those patents.

More old work to complete the picture,

The following work is from BillLawrenceOnline and it completes this picture for us so I’m relying on it entirely. Picking back up with Staple Street we take a short journey straight to China. Here’s what we learn.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave.

ENERGY

Remember, HSBC is a Chinese bank and a functionary of the capitalist arm of the CCP. The capitalist arm of the CCP is the CEFC and the CEFC is ENERGY.

So you tell me. Half of the Chinese One Belt One Road doctrine is energy; Biden the Chinese proxy is enmeshed in energy corruption the globe over; and the primary source of the energy corruption is China. Given the slice of pie – that’s right, a mere slice – we devoured here, is there any other way to see it? Not for my nickel.

I don’t think there is any question that the energy sector is being used to move money relative to the overarching criminal and treasonous construct. There’s also no question that I don’t have the time or resources to prove it.

Somebody can, though. After all, private equity deals that entail prime equity funds typically charge 2% of the assets under management and 20% of the profits when a deal is sold. These people are playing in boxes and inside of them; for the properly equipped investigator, is that evidence.

Can we make that evidence work? Yes, and we have $16 million worth of room inside a 1.5 billion dollar box.

-End-

SOURCES:

ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN ELEVEN TWELVE THIRTEEN FOURTEEN FIFTEEN SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN TWENTY TWENTY-ONE TWENTY-TWO TWENTY-THREE (in no order)

Two More Coffin Nails and 100% Certainty of COVID-19 Fraud – Can Anyone Prove It Isn’t?

Care to understand how COVID-19 is a false flag political construct that was intentionally developed as a bio-WMD to facilitate the overthrow of the U.S.? Then this article is for you and it includes an abundance of links and other resources to verify positions and provide you with all of the evidence you need for a deeper and clearer understanding of what is being done to us. That’s right – done to us.

On a date conveniently saddled between Christmas and New Year’s Eve 2019, when the majority of the Western world was occupied and distracted with both holiday recovery and preparation, the world fundamentally changed on 27 Dec 19 when the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak (not yet a “pandemic”) was first announced in the mainstream media news. They eased it in and perhaps many missed it.

GETTING TO THE PRESENT DAY

Curiously and by means of evidence later provided to me by an epidemiologist, we confirmed that the U.S. and other Western nations were ordering “COVID”-specific test kits and supplies by a name that technically wouldn’t exist until 11 Feb 20, when the WHO/CDC cohort would officially apply the “COVID-19” moniker to it. Moreover, the evidence demonstrates that the U.S. and those other nations were making such “COVID-19” purchases dating back to 2017 and in each and every year up to 2019. How does that happen outside of a planned event? It doesn’t – period.

I caught the breaking China viral outbreak story in real time and immediately became suspicious of it so I began paying attention and collecting evidence and data points as best I could. Those instincts were on-point and with deadly precision because the first infection and mortality data that arrived in February-March 2020 initially verified that position and placed us on an investigative track that’s still ongoing today; and like a fine wine, the complete body of work only improves as time passes; and in many critical ways not identified by anyone else. That was a year and a half and hundreds of articles and videos ago.

A day before the story broke back on 26 Dec 19 and moving forward in that general time; and in review of my pre-COVID-19 work, the focus then was diversified on topics like President Trump’s fraudulent impeachment (the first) over a completely legitimate and appropriate diplomatic phone call to Ukraine and tying that directly to the 2020 election timeline; Joe Biden and the Biden crime family’s energy corruption in Ukraine; developments, crime and corruption within the FBI; continued research into Q for vetting and establishing veracity; detailing efforts in institutional preservation relative to self-preservation (corrupt politicians); FISA abuse and especially against Lt. General Michael Flynn and President Trump; the 2015 cybersecurity bill relative to impeachment; the 2020 election; John Brennan; developments in Iran; the 25th Amendment; the coup d’etat in general; and more.

In the backdrop of most of what I’ve written and shared publicly, there has been a years-long private conversation with a cohort of informed, intelligent and fiercely patriotic people; one of whom provides me unique access to three particular sources I often cite without naming. In that dialogue, I began detailing my suspicions over the outbreak and even some of those individuals thought I was off the mark, but I continued to make my case over time. I didn’t; however, have anything beyond anecdotal and circumstantial evidence as supported by rational and logical thought and deduction that would permit me to publish and present cogent thoughts on COVID-19 being a false flag political construct and do so without looking mostly insane, which some friends and relatives already think anyways. So I withheld those thoughts until something would arrive into which I could sink my teeth.

It would end-up being the first data sets for infection and mortality that arrived in February-March 2020 that did it. My position on the “fake pandemic” was partly verified by what I found inside those data sets and now, I had to continue working to prove it, which constituted a long path forward.

The simple concept of inverse proportions on a single timeline and with hockey stick relationships (a hallmark indicator of fraud) made for some straight forward parsing out of data to confirm positions.

Notably and dating back to mid-December (pre-COVID), I was focused on this curious need for Adam Schiff (HPSCI) and Nancy Pelosi (Speaker) to ensure that President Trump were impeached before Christmas. Why? Who enforces a due date – like it’s some sort of overdue library book – rather than giving full fidelity to conducting a thorough, proper, fulsome and accurate investigation to provide full and accurate summary findings for public consumption?

No one. That’s who. No one who has a modicum of appreciation for the gravity of a presidential impeachment or fidelity for the work therein and sure as hell not Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff or Jerry Nadler (House Judiciary Committee.)

It would lead to one of the most substantial and exclusive findings that everybody else missed but I nailed down precisely – that the first impeachment was devised primarily as a deflection mechanism to usher-in COVID-19 while distracting the world from it. The COVID and impeachment timelines braided together like a rope in light of actions coming from the WHO/CDC cohort.

Everybody missed this. I didn’t and its fundamental importance can’t be overstated. What delivered it was a method of applying timeline overlays in search of overlaps. This timeline work is absolutely essential and it delivered throughout the investigation.

As impeachment dominated the news cycle, I continued to work on COVID in the backdrop; privately sharing thoughts and collecting what evidence I could. The MSM was essentially easing us along and letting the COVID pot come to a simmer on the back burner right up until the impeachment verdict was reached. Following the announced Senate trial acquittal, the COVID narrative was kicked into overdrive and that pot started towards a boil.

As best I can tell my first COVID post on social media was on or around 02 Feb 20 but really, I think I was chiming in on it as soon as days after the first news of it. I’m uncertain because my primary social media account – Twitter – is now deleted due to my banishment and I’ve not accessed the archive file.

On 05 Feb 20, the Senate acquitted President Trump in his impeachment trial and our COVID pot begins to boil. On 09 Feb 20, I had acquired enough evidence to publish my first article.

By mid-March, I had a galvanized position with substantial evidence that COVID-19 was a false flag political construct and we were set to continue making that case.

From early February moving forward, I had investigated and written about virtually every angle you could conceivably identify and using open sources to do it.

By mid-April 2020 and 28 articles into it, we were locked in for the first comprehensive article entitled Cause of Death for Sale, which delineated the broader premise and included examining financial incentives in federal dollars for medical providers complying with federally issued COVID policies (Fauci/CDC); all within the outlined construct for the criminal predicate (fraud), which I later diagrammed (below) to include a lengthy report I’ve yet to make public. That report assumes the same quality, format and detail relative to what I formerly used to submit to law firms and insurance companies as a high-value fraud investigator.

That article also contains the actual slides from the 13 Jan 17 presidential transition meetings whereby an outgoing Obama administration inserted the pandemic construct into the Trump administration by means of those same compulsory transition meetings.

Presidential transition meetings are framed in longstanding legislation that Obama augmented with an executive order on 18 Mar 16 when he included “pandemic preparedness” as a topic for the meetings. Obama’s White House also coordinated the initial leak of the Flynn/Russia lie releasing it to the MSM for publication immediately prior to the transition meetings and as a deflection or distraction.

Note this redundant pattern of tactics of using one event to detract from another.

Moving forward, note two critical elements. For one and relative to both the 2020 election and his eventual refusal in January 2021 to execute his electoral duties as President of the U.S. Senate, Mike Pence was previously assigned by President Trump as the point man for COVID-19. Then, in April 2020 during a legendary press conference, President Trump dragged Anthony Fauci to the podium and required him to correct the record that Trump had accepted all of his recommendations, mitigations and guidelines the first time they were presented to him and on each and every occasion.

This is a fundamental component that, once again, seems to have escaped everyone and it’s one I’ve hammered home in this context; alongside the use of the same tactic as identified in other contexts. With these critical maneuvers, President Trump sagely and entirely compartmentalized the culpability for COVID-19 and the accompanying genocide with the Pence/Fauci cohort. Having done so will allow Trump to walk away from a modern day holocaust with no strings attached and rightfully so. Pence and Fauci own it all.

Dating back to this general time period (spring into summer) last year, much effort was spent outlining the treasonous aspects of both former President Barack Obama’s presidency and a full slate of corrupt bureaucrats, officials and politicians.

In late August 2020, I reported that on 26 Aug 20, the most significant confirmation to-date was received relative to the underlying premise underpinning the entire COVID-19 “pandemic” – that the pandemic was nothing more than the deliberate propagation of patently fraudulent infection and mortality data harvested and curated from an average of 2.6 underlying comorbidities. Therein, they stated that 94% of the data used to justify guidelines and mitigations were unreliable and that only 6% was valid. This put the number of “COVID deaths” under 10,000 and precisely in the range of seasonal flu/pneumonia; not what the MSM is and has been reporting. Fraud. Through and through – fraud.

More recently I reported that on 12 May 21, the CDC made the same revisions but exacerbated the situation by increasing the numbers. It now stands such that for all “COVID deaths,” only 5% of the data remains valid, 95% of it has been revised away and the average number of underlying co-morbidities (primarily flu, pneumonia, heart disease, diabetes and obesity) was increased to 4.0. That’s even worse fraud.

INSERT GRAPHICS / POSTS / LINKS

As it stands now, there is no chance that the positions and work are in error or, in other words and as I’ve been hollering for about a year and a half and long before anybody else, the entire pandemic is one of fraudulent data. Every bit of it; except for the real virus, the real bio-weaponization of it, the real and intentional release of it and sadly, the real Americans and others who died from it. That’s all real. Very real. As in modern day holocaust real.

Let’s pause. Some of you are calling me out saying I’m contradicting myself but that would only be in absolute terms. Yes, the virus is real and it killed people and yes it’s entirely a pandemic of fraudulent data – they’re not mutually exclusive; rather, they serve one another. Look at what that nasty little bug has delivered. But here’s the data point that the CDC can’t escape.

Moving forward from October 2020 and focusing more closely on electoral politics, of which there has been and continues to be plenty, the effort continued to focus on enmeshing the established COVID-19 fraud as a known China mechanism within a broader effort from China, the CCP and the PLA; and then establishing all of the nexuses and linkages tying it all together. Again, there was no shortage of work and it can be consumed independently.

In November, I identified a particular aspect of COVID-19 respective to the stolen election and the need for President-elect Biden to enter office with momentum established to reverse course on it. Who unleashes a bio-WMD to steal an election only to let that bio-WMD continue to wreak havoc with your own presidency? No one. That’s who. That explains why Fauci began to pivot-out of COVID in late November; after the stolen election but before Biden entered office.

Keep the above in mind as I front-load the next data point. The front-load is this – the CDC/WHO cohort was using deliberately and anomalously high cycle thresholds (35-40 v. 17-25 and as an indicator of viral load) relative to PCR testing. Now, bear in mind that the virus was never isolated relative to PCR testing and moreover, the developer of the PCR test – who is now deceased circa 2019 – how convenient? – advised that the PCR test was never intended as a diagnosis tool implying that it’s being misused and delivering unreliable data relative to COVID.

Do you know what PCR tests with faulty high cycle thresholds deliver in absolute abundance? False positive test results. FALSE POSITIVE TEST RESULTS! Remember how I framed the “pandemic” as one of propagated fraudulent data? The intentionally faulty PCR tests, as determined by the CDC/WHO cohort, became the primary data driver for the pandemic.

Remember what occurred around mid-April 2020? The CDC/WHO moved away from the historical and conventional pandemic measurement of mortality data, which was in decline at the time, to the measurement of “new case data.” That’s never been done before and it allows them to leverage the faulty high CTs in the PCR test; remembering that beginning in January 2020, the Democrats were howling about expanded testing. Now you know why.

Following the mid-April shift, the PCR tests delivered the pandemic as designed and now, everywhere we see cases of expanded testing and vaccination, we see explosions in COVID “cases.” India and Seychelles are perfect examples of this dynamic and that of vaccinated people subsequently testing positive (Seychelles.)

I asked you to keep in mind the Fauci pivot out of COVID four paragraphs up and it applies to PCR testing. This is why. Knowing what you know now about PCR tests and acceptable cycle thresholds, consider this.

Do you know what the WHO/CDC did within one hour of Biden’s oddly early 20 Jan 21 inauguration? They revised the CT for PCR tests back down to a conventional range presumably at or near 17-25. WITHIN AN HOUR!

The COVID “variant” has become the 2021 version of the 2020 shift to new cases and in both instances, these deliberate spring-time maneuvers serve as bridges to drag the “pandemic” through the annual seasonal die-off of the co-morbidities (primarily flu/pneumo) being leveraged for data and taking us right back to peak flu season, which the CDC indicates as beginning every 01 Dec and running for two months. Rinse, repeat.

People not catching onto what I was shouting over a year ago was a nightmare come true – none of us are getting our lives back until someone makes these people stop.

After taking a stab at podcasting (9 volumes) followed a brief hiatus to take a needed break, I came back with several hard-hitting articles recently; saving the best for last. In the first, I provided a complete recapitulation and explanation of the pandemic while reinforcing the notion that the country seems to be oblivious to the fact that we find ourselves in an undeclared third world war and with a Chinese proxy occupying the White House in preparation for taking a likely dive.

In an another, I built on existing work to zero back in on the longstanding position that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is the genesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; that the virus was bio-engineered and bio-weaponized; that it was released deliberately; and that Fauci and the NIH collaborated on and funded the research.

A third article delineates how China may use their Biden proxy to legislatively apply Chinese doctrine to the U.S. with the looming infrastructure bill.

The fourth one identifies a substantial shift in the broader narrative and whereby I have identified the exit plan for Biden and China whereby a carve-out is being made for China to assume responsibility for a “leak” by sowing a fraudulent narrative around internal lab sloppiness. This apparent and odd assumption of culpability by China permits the compartmentalization with China itself and that is beyond a big deal.

China is making this compartmentalization as a means of excluding the U.S. from and completely controlling the explaining narrative. It allows China to determine the exact explanation of the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and to provide all of the requisite evidence (or not) they want (after they fabricate to meet needs.) It should a surprise to no one that Biden recently ended former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s investigation into the same rather preferring to defer to the WHO, which China (and Gates and others) own and have owned by means of funding. No sooner did I hit publish than did Joe Biden announce today that he’s opening is on inquiry. Joe can’t even find his house shoes.

What are the chances that Proxy Joe and the CCP sing the same song in their summary findings?

For deeper understanding of how and why that is important (and it is and in fundamental ways), take-in the linked above-linked article because once again, China is leveraging the strategy of compartmentalization just as the U.S. used it as outlined in the next article and relative to U.S. biosecurity.

The fifth article is the most recent and it appears to be an absolute haymaker; catching the attention of others. Lin Wood, John Here to Help and I all recommend that you consume it independently and fully for it identifies and delineates something that few if any are talking about – the 2009-2016 timeline.

The 2009-2016 timeline featured an outgoing Bush handing off another executive order to an incoming Obama and for the express purpose of remaking U.S. biosecurity writ large at U.S. biocontainment facilities. It was all predicated by a Department of Defense initiative and further, it appears that Obama leveraged a potential false flag construct created by a memo co-issued by Lisa Monaco (Department of Homeland Security) in the form of a national “security stand down” at U.S. biocontainment facilities. The security stand down permitted the capture of necessary labs to prevent further exposure in an internal whistleblower scare and may have been a mechanism to off-shore dangerous and unethical GOF research to China.

In backtracking all of the documents and reports – hundreds and hundreds of pages – I identified a specific timeline along with its components and established that the beginning of this particular effort occurred during “Phase 1” in 1999 during the Clinton presidency. I then link from Clinton through every administration right up to Biden. For the record and according to my work, you can draw all of it back to at least George H.W. Bush and prior to the time he entered the CIA in the 1960s.

Who bridges the presidencies of GHW Bush, Clinton, GW Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden? Anthony Fauci. He entered the federal apparatus un-elected in 1984 during the Reagan administration. Who was VPOTUS then? GHW Bush. Full circle and closed.

In this monster article eclipsing 8,000 words, I identify how the Obama DoD initiative served to underpin a complete rules re-write for biosecurity to install a philosophical change that featured moving away from more robust biosecurity to a system that compartmentalizes biosecurity at the individual scientist and laboratory level; just like the stolen election compartmentalized voter fraud at the individual state and voter precinct level.

Are you now coming to understand how these people operate?

Importantly, it should be understood that internal U.S. whilstleblowers came forward to report U.S. gain of function research which the Obama administration halted in 2015 before they off-shored the effort to China in 2016. Again, it was the Monaco memo and the subsequent national “security stand down” that may have been the false flag mechanism to envelop and facilitate the off-shoring of U.S. gain of function work to China.

That brings us to the present and with new coffin nails en route for bad people and entities.

TWO MORE NAILS IN THE COFFINS

Perhaps pause for a moment and let all of the above sink-in to marinate because two new story lines further validate our positions and the full body of work. They also provide for two additional nails in the coffins of Fauci, China, Biden, the fraudulent COVID-19 construct and the treasonous rest of them all.

For one, we now have two widely known and highly regarded virologists who previously and similarly provided work and evidence, which we then cited and worked from, and which identified SARS-CoV-2 as bioengineered as a bio-WMD. The evidence is derived from the existence of six artificial HIV inserts, which can not in any way be accounted for as occurring in nature. This was a primary and underpinning premise to scaffold our overarching position(s) on the COVID-19 “pandemic” and this further verification of it is of great consequence.

Consider this from Zero Hedge,

British professor Angus Dalgleish – best known for creating the world’s first ‘HIV vaccine’, and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen – chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, who has published 31 peer-reviewed papers and holds several patents, wrote that while analyzing virus samples last year, the pair discovered “unique fingerprints” in the form of “six inserts” created through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

They also conclude that “SARS-Coronavirus-2 has “no credible natural ancestor” and that it is “beyond reasonable doubt” that the virus was created via “laboratory manipulation.”
END QUOTE

ZERO HEDGE

For brevity’s sake and understanding that other teams of virologists and their findings were also discussed, including this quote, “If I was trying to engineer a virus strain with a higher affinity and infective potential to humans, I would do exactly that…”, we’ll exclude the balance of the article and recommend that it be consumed in full.

It should also be noted that up until now and based upon previous research, we understood the number of artificial HIV insertions to be four (4), which they now update to six (6.)

The second story line is about fully explainable from the headline alone; also sourced at Zero Hedge – Fauci In 2012: Gain-Of-Function Research ‘Worth Risk Of Lab Accident Sparking Pandemic’.

From Zero Hedge quoting Fauci,

“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” Fauci wrote in the American Society for Microbiology in 2012, adding “Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?”

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks,” Fauci continued. “It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

ZERO HEDGE

Really, Tony?

It seems to me, rather, that based upon evidence and not Fauci’s always incorrect rhetoric, it is more likely that a pandemic would occur in U.S. and Chinese laboratories and with compromised scientists and treasonous politicians serving an evil Deep State and with Fauci running point.

The intelligence community is the spine to the overarching coup d’etat effort just as Anthony Fauci is the bridge connecting every presidency from George H.W. Bush through Joe Biden’s stolen, illegitimate and fraudulent presidency.

We began this article by asking if you cared to understand how COVID-19 is a false flag political construct that was intentionally developed as a bio-WMD to facilitate the overthrow of the U.S.?

Let’s rewrite that question and make it rhetorical for our closing – Can anyone prove that it isn’t?

-End-

Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules

Have you ever noticed that whenever the Deep State/Democrats change inconvenient rules, which is often accompanied by a move to better and enhanced technologies, it creates a portal permitting rampant fraud?

Have you ever noticed that such rules changes are normally executed by executive order, which equates to unilateral decision making, which equates to tyranny?

What are the chances that then President Barack Obama would inherit an outgoing George W. Bush executive order (#13486) devised to overhaul U.S. biosecurity in its biocontainment facilities and by means of a hand-picked “working group?” Rhetorical question; the chances are 100%.

Is it possible that Obama changed the rules pertaining to biosecurity beginning immediately upon entering office in 2009?

Did Obama use a 2014 “security stand down” issued unilaterally by Lisa Monaco (Department of Homeland Security) to alter rules and protocols for the purpose of loosening U.S. biosecurity measures writ large and in advance of underpinning the off-shoring of gain of function research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China beginning on a 2014 (halted research) – 2015 (off-shored and funded) timeline?

History helps answer these questions.

The nation’s most sensitive FISA rules (laws) were deliberately broken to spy on then candidate and later President Donald J. Trump along with other critical personnel under the Trump umbrella, like Lt. General Michael Flynn.

Impeachment rules were changed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi to reassign impeachment oversight from Jerry Nadler’s House Judiciary Committee – the lawful impeachment body – to Adam Schiff’s HPSCI; serving to further compartmentalize the fraudulent action within the treasonous intelligence community, which is essentially the spine to all of this corruption, treason and potential genocide (for the record, it’s actual; not potential, and the term ‘modern day holocaust’ is appropriate.)

State election rules (laws) were changed, broken or circumvented in multiple states to permit the theft of the 2020 election.

Elections rules (laws) were changed to ensure that precincts used preferred electronic voting machines that feature enhanced and better technologies like cellular modems, which can be leveraged by things like Hammer and Scorecard.

On 18 Mar 16 and with executive order Public Law 114-136, Obama changed longstanding presidential rules (law) by augmenting them to include pandemic preparedness; later inserting a political false flag construct (the COVID-19 pandemic) into the Trump administration during those same statutorily compulsory presidential transition meetings on 13 Jan 17.

So, again, I ask – Have you ever noticed that whenever the Deep State/Democrats change inconvenient rules, which is often accompanied by a move to better and enhanced technologies, it creates a portal permitting rampant fraud? This frames the basis of our long and intense discussion today.

In the same vein of rules changes and to recapitulate our premise, it appears that right from the very beginning of his first term in early 2009, Obama leveraged a biosecurity executive order inherited from an outgoing Bush (11 days before Obama’s inauguration) to make substantial rules changes in biosecurity writ large. Those changes eventually permitted the off-shoring of gain of function research relative to the SARS-CoV-2 virus to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. It appears Obama then leveraged an apparent manufactured biosecurity crisis created by a DHS memo issued by Lisa Monaco in 2014 that cited three unrelated incidents as justification for issuing a national “security stand down” at U.S. biocontainment facilities, which created the entities and processes to make the rules changes. The Monaco memo coincides with internal U.S. whistleblowers who, on the same 2014 timeline, shined the light on U.S. gain of function research causing Obama’s administration to halt it and then, in 2015, off-shore it to China and fund it with Fauci’s NIH, et al.

THE BACKDROP

Here is contextual backdrop information for this work that explains the emergence of the U.S. into this bio-warfare dynamic and it should be understood for the rest of our discussion. It is extracted from a May 2009 Department of Defense report that we continue to examine throughout and which overlaps Obama’s first term.

Biological Select Agents and Toxins and Bio-Safety Level Laboratories: After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 and the anthrax letters mailed later that same year, Congress recognized the threat of terrorism and enacted the USA Patriot Act in 2001. The Patriot Act makes it illegal for an individual to possess BSATs for any reason other than bona fide research. The act states: “Whoever knowingly possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system of a type or in a quantity that, under the circumstances, is not reasonably justified by a prophylactic, protective, bona fide research, or other peaceful purpose.” In response to these events, DoD and the service Inspector General teams inspected DoD biological RDT&E laboratories and advocated development of a surety program for biological agents, similar to existing surety programs for nuclear and chemical programs. In 2002, Congress enacted the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act that tasked the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to prepare a list of select agents and toxins based on the criteria specified in the act; the current version of that list is found in Table 2 along with the associated bio-safety levels (BSL).

Taking it back even further, know that Phase I of this broader effort dates back to 1999 during Bill Clinton’s presidency and further, Hillary Clinton will bear down in this momentarily. The 1999 timeline abuts to the 2001 9/11 timeline, which is not coincidental or by accident.

Another important contextual backdrop item, of which there are too many to include, from the DoD report is that of all of the identified viable threats to biosecurity systems, the one posing the greatest threat is the “insider threat;” and not without a sense of irony, that is the precise threat that bears down in the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic (emphasis mine).

There was general agreement that an insider could remove BSAT material without detection. However, there was also considerable skepticism that an insider could use a DoD laboratory to proceed with weaponization steps undetected, other than in cases where the planned legitimate work involved equipment or processes that might enable weaponization; in such cases, additional security measures and monitoring should be provided and carefully observed.

Attempting to manipulate large quantities of agents (or weaponization) with steps that require specific equipment (e.g., lyophilizers) is much more likely to arouse suspicion and be detected by an alert management. On the other hand, these further steps (weaponization and quantity) could be accomplished in a garage, basement, or a less-protected lab, such as in a school, with some risk to persons nearby. Any individual who intends to employ a pathogen as a weapon is unlikely to be inhibited from using makeshift facilities that lack the full suite of safety practices utilized by the biodefense labs.

Our focus is being narrowed to something called the “two-person rule” relative to video monitoring systems and other important safeguards. The narrow focus allows us to demonstrate what appears to be a broader fundamental and deliberate shift to move U.S. biocontainment facilities and the regulations and rules framing their handling of BSATs and their interactions with foreign facilities and individuals, in the direction of a less robust biosecurity system; not a more robust one.

Note that the report indicates that the “two-person rule,” which is expanded on below, is of higher cost relative to lower value. Throughout the reports we examined, there is a firm, consistent and detracting message representing an effort to move away from the two-person system, which makes for a second, knowledgeable and objectively impartial set of eyes in the lab at all times.

Why?

Why not move in the other direction and mandate both the 2-person system and the video system? Why not make it a 3-person system including an international representative?

Simple logic tells us that the 2-person system matched to other effective biosecurity measures enhances biosecurity but the underpinning philosophical approaches being ushered-in by Obama’s administration curiously cause for a less robust and more vulnerable biosecurity system.

Look around you and ask yourself if that was an accident?

This is from the same DoD report (emphasis mine),

Two-person Rule and Video Monitoring: The current view on thwarting an attempt to steal weaponizable BSATs is typically to apply a two-person rule for working in the lab. In addition, most labs have some degree of video monitoring with a bank of display screens at some central point (e.g., guard post). The two-person rule is considered onerous, and potentially dangerous as it requires someone other than the active scientist to be present in the lab. It is also costly in terms of dollars and personnel. The video monitor is typically thought of as a forensic tool after the fact, but in real time it is only a bank of screens occasionally observed by people who are not experts in lab techniques. Table 7 outlines some of the pros and cons of the two approaches. The task force judged neither approach to be effective as they are used today. Even as a forensic tool, the video is generally retained for short periods of time and the need for forensics may occur months or years after the theft.

Note how the 2-person rule is hammered with negative connotation and devalued relative to cost, which repeats in additional reports and documents as follows. In typical propaganda form, it’s also book-ended by a criticism of the video system they recommend and prefer; constituting the classic propaganda tactic mixing of info and disinfo.

In actuality, though, it’s more than that. I assume it’s also likely to be a specific weakness they intended to exploit in order to operate in darkness and with no one else to see – literally. It’s a simple as saying a 1-person system only has one set of real eyes in the lab.

With the backdrop in place – lets get into it.

WEAKENING BIOSECURITY

Our discussion begins with recent work revisiting the WIV as the origin of the fraudulent data-driven COVID-19 pandemic; especially since it’s resurfacing in the broader narrative and making Trump and then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (and the rest of us “conspiracy theorists” who have had this precisely dialed all along) appear as prognosticating geniuses (accurate intelligence helps.)

I’ve also recently summarily rehashed the COVID-19 construct to provide a succinct but thorough explanation of it; examined how China may leverage the pending U.S. infrastructure bill to apply Chinese doctrine to America; and I identified the Deep State/China/CCP exit plan from the attribution of the COVID-19 genesis to the Wuhan lab, which is manifesting as an emerging carve-out in the broader narrative.

Let’s start with James LeDuc from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston; which is only about 55 or so miles from the now shuttered Chinese consulate in Houston that is known as a hotbed for Deep State/CCP activity and which was recently observed (last summer) burning documents on its rooftop. Notably, our reporting has previously covered how the UTMD was enmeshed in the COVID-19 pandemic in troubling ways.

It was LeDuc’s long-tenured relationships with the CDC, UTMB and Anthony Fauci; including being the recipient of substantial funding from Fauci, that when matched with his with his recommendation to examine the WIV using a pro-China narrative (that such a possibility is “less likely”) that is causing us to scrutinize him more closely.

LeDuc set us on this course and that work grew some legs; potentially long ones.

What really holds our attention with LeDuc is this – his advisement to upper echelon scientists in the area of biosecurity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2008 and as an overlap to Obama’s first term beginning in 2009; and emphasizing our position that Obama has been and continues to run point on all things and whereas Biden is his (and China’s/CCP’s) proxy in an otherwise shadow government (video below).

Beyond the philosophical shift to replace or diminish the 2-person system in favor of a fallible video system and the pitfalls inherent to that, there were other significant philosophical approaches being taken that also appeared to counter a robust biosecurity system.

Specifically, the philosophy of driving a “culture of responsibility” bearing down at the individual scientist level achieves a specific tactical and strategic purpose. It compartmentalizes biosecurity system within the individuals. That is important when you come to understand that individuals can be (have been) compromised and leveraged for nefarious reasons. Just ask Mike Pence. We’ll talk more about the Deep State vernacular always used to do this sort of thing.

I was able to identify 23 prior publications from LeDuc and I looked at several of them more closely. Our attention is drawn to one in particular that was authored in 2011 and it rests on his prior positions; including his 2008 advisement to the WIV, as I previously reported and noted. The co-authored piece is entitled ‘Balancing Our Approach to the Insider Threat.’

LeDuc’s introduction to this item should be consumed alongside my established position on the status quo, which is that 9/11 is a previous and sequential step with a bridge to COVID-19 and existing on a generational timeline. That said, LeDuc’s introduction to this item is unsurprising given that he’s of Fauci’s ilk.

First, here’s that description of the status quo, which exists in what I believe may be a divided government with the military recognizing Trump as president and the Judiciary and Congress recognizing Biden (because they helped install him.)

With confidence, it can be and has been demonstrated that individuals within the U.S., some with ties back to Nazi-era Germany (Bush family, et al.), conspired with China/CCP/PLA to research, fund, develop and then deploy a bio-WMD taking the form of SARS-CoV-2, which has genetic markers indicating four artificial HIV insertions and gain of function indicators, to exploit its previous deep and broad infiltration of the U.S. to remove its sitting president, overthrow its government, install a Chinese proxy (Biden) and destroy the nation from within by dividing its people with a fraudulent systemic racism campaign and by destroying its economy with a fraudulent pandemic; and all of it leverages treasonous politicians, officials and CEOs in the United States.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

Here’s LeDuc’s ominous introduction to the piece (emphasis mine),

Bioterrorism was a concern of some in government even before Al Qaida–manned planes took down the World Trade Center towers. The anthrax letters greatly heightened that concern and extended it to our citizens as well. The nation responded with billions of dollars: bio- defense research and development, medical countermea- sures, equipment, training first responders, and funding construction of numerous high-containment laboratories. A next generation of scientists began working with what had been called, just since the mid-90s, ‘‘select agents’’; these were generally ‘‘high-risk’’ pathogens, including some that had been studied in state-sponsored biological warfare programs during the Cold War.

LeDuc’s co-authored piece would be foreboding (emphasis mine),

The commission’s report raised the risk of biological terrorism above nuclear terrorism and stated that the nation should ‘‘be more concerned that scientists will become terrorists than that terrorists will become scientists.’’ About the same time, Congressional testimony and concern in the science community resulted in 4 national level studies generally addressing what we now call ‘‘the insider threat’’ in biology.

The following quote is the initial aspect that fully caught my attention and set us on this course (emphasis mine),

A Defense Science Board study, Department of Defense Biological Safety and Security Program (May 2009), acknowledged the insider threat as a very difficult problem, noted that the Department of Defense had the most stringent laboratory security regulations, recommended laboratory video cameras in labs rather than a 2-person rule (1 person to watch another scientist at work), encouraged tailoring the Personnel Reliability Programs (PRP) in bio- logical labs to avoid having a negative impact on research, and underscored the importance of public awareness regarding risk reduction.
END QUOTE

Why is LeDuc recommending that this change be made and why did he provide the exact same recommendation to scientists at the WIV in 2008? Why did this overlap Obama’s first term?

For clarity, Obama’s presidency began following the noon inauguration on 20 Jan 09. For more clarity, understand that LeDuc is a Fauci lackey and that Fauci entered service under Reagan (George H.W. Bush was VPOTUS) in 1984. He – Fauci – bridges George H.W. Bush to Clinton to George W. Bush to Obama to Trump to Biden.

So, why does LeDuc put a robust biosecurity system in the backseat in favor of a fallible video system and why do they prefer to address ideological concerns such as “negative impact on research” or scientists being “negatively affected?” Are those appropriate priorities?

Wouldn’t a robust biosecurity system entail informing the scientists that they’re conducting arguably the world’s most sensitive and dangerous research and if they can’t handle the requisite rigors and strict protocols of an effective and robust biosecurity system because it causes them emotional, psychological or professional harm, then they are not qualified for the job.

Hire someone else. Problem solved – unless, of course, your goal is to have and leverage a problem you designed yourself.

The company line offered here by Obama’s administration is an excuse that such a robust system and its restrictive measures interfere with recruiting the best scientific talent. Does that mean that the best scientific talent prefers to work without stringent guardrails to protect against possible deliberate or otherwise but most certainly unethical catastrophes?

Or is it a measure pertaining to the “best” scientific talent being perhaps the scientific “talent” that is willing to engage in bio-weaponization and gain of function work?

Moving forward relative to the quotes that follow, study how the Deep State makes patently obvious policy decisions that equate to more lax biosecurity and then explains it all away with flowery academic language pulling on about any string that is not common sense, human nature or actual science (their favorite tactic.)

The following is a perfect example of how this Fauci cohort is using their own vernacular to compartmentalize biosecurity with individual scientists. Remember that an individual scientist can be leveraged and compromised much more effectively than an entire robust biosecurity system.

In this instance and as he makes his remarks, LeDuc is pulling from a report we’ll visit momentarily (emphasis mine) when he says, “…the importance of strong leadership and a culture of personal responsibility in laboratories.”

That small fragment is a driving force in the broader Obama biosecurity philosophy. They conveniently compartmentalize biosecurity in two specific ways: at 1) the laboratory level and 2) the level of the individual scientist. Do you see the parallel to election fraud, which similarly occurred at state and precinct levels?

This notion of compartmentalization can’t be overstated. Culpability for curating all of the COVID-19 infection and mortality data was compartmentalized with medical providers. Enforcement for COVID-19 mitigations and guidelines leveraged federalism to be compartmentalized at the state and local levels.

A great analog for compartmentalization can be found in cancer. Which is easier to remove? Cancer metastasized throughout the entire body or an individual tumor in an accessible location? Compartmentalization is critical.

Just like compartmentalization permitted the theft of the election at specific accessible locations, compartmentalizing the biosecurity system within the individual scientists and laboratory leadership, permits entities to compromise the entire U.S. system essentially undetected by leveraging specific accessible locations and individuals.

Consider the similarities with how China is now compartmentalizing the culpability for the genesis of COVID-19, which was actually a bio-WMD strike against the U.S., in a false narrative being constructed around faulty lab sloppiness.

LeDuc, Fauci, et al. are recommending policies that compartmentalize biosecurity arguably because it lends toward a more vulnerable system that is more easily (and deliberately) compromised.

Otherwise, can anyone explain the rationale behind moving off a more robust 2-person biosecurity system, which leverages an unaffiliated third-party scientist (and that scientist’s human conscience) as an objective and methodological surveillance procedure to personally monitor the activities of another scientist at any/all times when inside the lab; and especially so since they are doing the world’s most dangerous work?

Not I. There is not one iota of common sense that prevails there.

Why do teachers walk around the room and from behind, look over the shoulders of students as they take their tests? Rhetorical question.

Examine the following as to whether it is representative of robust biosecurity measures or Deep State, bureaucratic, nonsense vernacular that explains away actual biosecurity in favor of something intentionally and deliberately inadequate and vulnerable (emphasis mine)?

Finally, the National Academies of Science released a study, Responsible Research with Biological Select Agents and Toxins (September 2009), leading with the call for building a culture of trust, engaging stakeholders, requiring government inspectors to have technical and laboratory experience, and pointing out the futility of attempting to implement an overly stringent agent accountability program.

The reports from the science community, the National Academies of Science, and the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, in particular, emphasized the importance of building a ‘‘culture of responsibility’’ and the value of leadership in making laboratories safe and the conduct of science responsible.

None of that is actual biosecurity but rather bullshit philosophical ideas about it. Once you know what to look for, finding it becomes relatively easy and here’s more (emphasis mine).

We have greatly increased security, installed cameras and stationed armed guards, and implemented PRPs at our government laboratories. We have implemented select agent rules—which have negatively affected our scientists’ ability to share microbial isolates with colleagues at collaborating facilities here and abroad—and we have required scientists to keep even more detailed records in an attempt to account for unmeasurable quantities of readily multiplying microbes. But what have we done to positively change the culture in our laboratories? We’ve done the easy part—the part that can be readily purchased or that lends itself to regulation and checklist management.

“Here and abroad?” Abroad, like China?

Does that translate to, “we are loosening up rules and protocols on sharing BSATs (SARS-CoV-2?) including sharing with overseas labs (China?).”

It even appears that they care for the reader to feel bad about it with those poor scientists being “negatively affected” and the concern for the “culture in our laboratories,” as if this is some liberal arts project on multiculturalism and race.

Here is more of the same flowery, bullshit vernacular angling for about anything other than a robust biosecurity system (emphasis mine).

We hear little of the value of ‘‘leadership’’ as a measure of safety and security in our select agent labs. Successful, enlightened leaders lead with quality science, an emphasis on safety, vision, education, responsibility, accountability, honesty, transparency, and ethics. From this, a culture of trust and accountability virtually always results. Regulatory oversight may call for varying levels of physical security, ‘‘lists’’ and pathogen controls, background checks and psychological evaluation of workers. These, without effective leadership, may only slow research progress and lead to a culture of frustration and mistrust.

“May call” for varying levels of physical security? “Individual responsibility?” It’s absolute tripe and by design. It’s garbage; bullshit as stated; talking out ones own ass; whatever you care to call it, which can be anything but effective and robust biosecurity.

Trust “always results? That is Deep State vernacular explaining away something they can’t control with an absolute – “always.” Red flag.

In this day, time and place, who in ones right mind blindly trusts the Chinese with bio-WMD proprietary knowledge and samples because of belief in ones own made-up “culture of responsibility?”

Fauci admitted he was essentially too lazy to vet his Chinese grant (think access) recipients against the CCP. He actually said that. How dumb does he think we are?

Having spared you several segments of LeDuc’s short piece, it ends with this (emphasis mine).

Our life science enterprise, ever more important to our nation’s well-being in this global economy, will never be risk free. Official biosecurity policy must include means of fostering enlightened leaders; with the leadership approach comes better science, better safety, and, we believe, even better security. Without it, the other measures be- come little more than the appearance of security. Troubled scientists have and will come to an engaged and enlightened leader for help, where openness has been built and trust is the currency. There are too little data to know if he or she will go to a ‘‘regulator’’ in a laboratory where trust is lacking.

“The appearance of security?” “Trust is lacking?

Nope. Rather, what’s lacking is the robust biosecurity system that would have prevented the FAUXVID-19 horse from ever leaving the barn.

Let’s focus more precisely and dial this down on Obama where in earlier reporting I previously remarked, “that is how Obama’s administration stopped (in 2014) and then off-shored and funded (in 2015) its gain of function research by sending it to the National Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.”

It’s important to remember that the ONLY reason the Obama administration paused GOF research in 2014 is because several folks internally suddenly sprouted a conscience – the same human conscience that all of these recommendations are suggesting be eliminated from labs due to high cost and low value – and shined a light on it. Otherwise, they would have continued uninterrupted with GOF work in the U.S.

From our May 2009 Department of Defense Biological Safety and Security Program report, we note that it overlaps another Obama/DOD effort that was also begun in the same 2009 timeframe; and on the same treasonous political continuum. The latter Obama effort produced the U.S. landscape we see today and it was discussed in detail in a previous article, which describes Obama’s application of his counterinsurgency doctrine to America. It served to function as a blueprint framing the overthrow of a sitting president and the U.S. government, which is a practice perfected overseas by the U.S. military and intelligence communities (again, see Hammer and Scorecard.)

The DoD report begins with an ominous tone,

Based on a series of briefings and site visits, and the experience of task force members, the single overarching finding of this investigation is that a determined adversary cannot be prevented from obtaining very dangerous biological materials intended for nefarious purposes, if not from DoD laboratories, then from other sources. The nation needs to recognize this reality and be prepared to mitigate the effects of a biological attack. Today, we as a nation are not prepared.

The report contains two important pieces of information. For one,

Overseas regulations: Use Department of State background investigations for host country personnel working in BSAT labs outside the United States. Issue waiver authority so that laboratory commanders can determine appropriate security measures for shipments into these facilities.

Falling back on the apparent objective of loosening biosecurity and the tactic of compartmentalizing it individually, the compartmentalization is extended to “laboratory commanders” who have “waiver authority” relative to shipping BSATs (SARS-CoV-2?) to bio-containment facilities; including overseas facilities (China?).

Further, keep an eye out for the Department of State angles because in addition to the origins of the biosecurity shift drawing back to Bill Clinton’s presidency in 1999, at the time of this 2009 DoD report, the Secretary of State is none other than Hillary Clinton. We’ll discuss her in more detail below.

Relative to “overseas regulations,” remember that the NIH/Fauci were funding the WIV after off-shoring its gain of function research there in 2014-2015. In consideration of that, we continue to wonder if these 2009 DoD changes were devised to set the landscape to permit all of that? After all, they began in 1999 while Bill Clinton – as Commander in Chief – was steering the DoD and they were gifted to Obama by Bush’s EO with the expectation that Hillary would win in 2016.

The 2-person policy continues to bear down.

BSAT transport: Review the usefulness of the two-person rule in preventing insider threats. Use “lost in the crowd” approach for shipments into laboratories. And consider the potential use of flight safe, tamper-resistant shipping containers.

The DoD report provides more similar evidence of concern elaborating on the identified and primary “insider threat” (emphasis mine).

The insider threat dominates internal security concerns: An insider could probably transfer BSAT out of the facility or supply chain without being discovered, regardless of defensive countermeasures. One can only make it difficult and uncertain for the insider. Detection of an insider threat is difficult even with extensive monitoring of the emotional and mental state of BSAT-certified employees, including transport personnel.

Improved video monitoring of labs can be superior to the two-person rule for detecting or deterring nefarious activities in the lab and can be valuable in assuring good safety practices.

BSAT transport works well today using the “lost in the crowd” approach, and may be worse with a two-person rule.

These positions appear to be the foundation for the loosening of biosecurity rules and regulations; noting that the “lost in the crowd” approach in transporting BSATs to labs is interpreted to be that BSATs are included in shipments with other similar but different samples and whereas they are “hiding” in plain sight being “lost in the crowd” of other samples. Is that a secure manner to transport, handle and ensure the chain of custody uniquely, separately and explicitly or is that more bullshit vernacular to explain away robust biosecurity?

Is that a way to circumvent strict inventory and auditing controls that would be found in a robust biosecurity system – to just throw them in with the rest?

Interestingly, a precise definition for “in the crowd” could not be located so if the inference is wrong, I’ll happily walk that aspect back. I’m not wrong.

From the DoD report (emphasis mine),

Rather than steal BSAT from a DoD lab, other paths would appear preferable for an adversary (e.g., natural sources, non-DoD labs, non-U.S. labs, genomic synthesis) except possibly in the case of a blackmailed or disgruntled employee working from the inside. DoD should avoid those measures that are significantly detrimental to the laboratory mission, onerous, or detract from morale unless the measure significantly improves security or safety. Covert external threats are unlikely and layers of defensive measures serve to deter further. An external “attack” by a demonstration mob or explosives, coupled with inflammatory media, could panic the surrounding populace.

From the Recommendations section of the DoD report,

Monitoring Activities: Make minor changes to monitor activities in labs to improve effectiveness without introducing significantly obtrusive measures that are unwarranted by the threat.

Again, it’s the same sacrifice of robust biosecurity for vague and ambiguous descriptions proffered in Deep State vernacular.

With the Clintons deeply enmeshed and Hillary at State, consider this recommendation below permitting State to inherit the authority to conduct background investigations for foreign (China?) recipients of BSATs.

That’s the same Hillary Clinton that maintained a private and unsecured server in her personal residence to deliver SAPs and highly classified and protected intelligence to China/CCP/PLA. See the repeated pattern of tactics and specifically relative to China? Rhetorical question.

OCONUS Regulations: Issue a blanket waiver for use of Department of State background investigations (conducted by U.S. Embassy Regional Security Office), in place of National Agency Check with Local Agency Check and Credit (NACLC), among host country personnel working with BSATs in DoD labs outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

Below, the rubber begins to meet the road with the recommendation to dispatch the 2-person biosecurity system for BSAT shipments to DoD labs (smuggling could be a possible synonym.)

BSAT Transport: Review use of the two-person rule for BSAT shipments; threat is unlikely. Continue to use “lost in the crowd” approach used for the shipments involving DoD labs. As a future option, investigate potential of flight safe, tamper-resistant shipping containers.

The DoD report concludes its recommendations (emphasis mine),

In summary, the recommendations in these seven areas will enhance current bio-safety and bio-security operations at the DoD laboratories while minimizing the impact of regulatory processes on the missions of those laboratories. The cost of implementing these recommendations is believed to be modest, but should not be imposed on the research programs that affect the missions of the labs.

That gives the appearance of a fundamental redirection from the priority from operational biosecurity to operational mission objectives, does it not? In both instances above – operational biosecurity and cost – mission objectives are given the priority over biosecurity.

Would “missions” include gain of function research relative to the SARS-CoV-2 virus?

From the DoD report (emphasis mine).

With respect to monitoring lab work to detect nefarious activities, the task force concluded the following: The two-person rule for security has many disadvantages but may be effective in certain, limited circumstances, primarily for safety while working with highly pathogenic materials or laboratory animals. In the long run, costs associated with the two-person approach are excessive and the effectiveness for security is highly questionable. Surveillance with the two-person rule is not likely to be continuous over an extended period and a perpetrator can know when he is not being observed (the other person’s back is turned). (See Figure 1 for an example of a typical lab floor plan). In addition, most labs have very constrained working areas and the observer would not be in a position to continuously observe the worker. Video surveillance of the labs can be much more effective than the two-person rule if enhanced with better procedures, better tools for monitoring, longer retention of recordings, and management participation. In addition, it probably results in lower long-term cost. Video has the advantage of constant surveillance; the malefactor doesn’t know when he is being monitored or not. Data overload problem of video should be dealt with by spot checking and random supervisory audits, and with tools developed for that purpose. Video surveillance has potential cross-benefits in checking for adherence to safety procedures and should be seen by the staff as dominantly for that purpose Video recordings are usually kept for 30–45 days at most labs while others save them for up to a year. They should be kept longer.

Video monitoring of labs for security is preferred over the two-person rule and could be much more effective than it is today. The primary concern is the disgruntled or stressed employee and the combination of video monitoring and BPRP should be integrated to detect such individuals. In monitoring, whether by video or by a second person, the question is where the focus should be for detecting problems most effectively. The following are examples of possible unauthorized acts that would be indicative of malfeasance: intentional concealing of containers or vials transfer of BSAT containers through showers, locker areas, or air locks preparation of live, dried BSATs unauthorized personnel in restricted areas manipulation of unregistered or undocumented BSAT cultures or containers tampering with freezer, incubator, or pass-through window locks manipulating BSAT cultures outside of bio-safety cabinets or outside of approved labs conducting animal studies without an approved protocol manipulating BSATs without appropriate safety procedures or equipment inadequate decontamination or destruction of working BSAT cultures at study conclusion.

Is there any science backing the claims proffered in their slick vernacular? No, hence the need for slick vernacular.

More importantly, it’s the same bullshit dialogue detracting from the fact that the rules are being changed towards more lax biosecurity. Look here; not there.

The explanation is simple and about anyone can comprehend it. Given that these scientists are conducting research of the highest risk and consequences, policy should dictate that biocontainment facilities BE DOING ALL OF IT – taking all of the reasonable measures; not bickering about and selecting over the options.

Instead, though, they are using this detracting dialogue to reduce biosecurity measures and cleverly push it in the wrong direction.

Regarding individuals cleared to handle BSATs, the FBI conducts SRA background investigations on all individuals but moreover, in those security clearance considerations, the Secretary of State, who was Clinton at the time, bears down again with authority,

“…is an alien who is a national of a country as to which the Secretary of State has made a determination (that remains in effect) that such country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism.”

Does China qualify by those terms? Factoring in Clinton’s State Department considerations, why did this report not mention China once? It mentioned countries in the Middle East but not China. It’s a small data point worth the mention.

The DoD report goes on to elaborate on the balance of the background investigations for BSAT handlers that go beyond the requisite FBI’s SRA and they can be consumed independently (linked below).

THE MONACO MEMO

We turn our attention to the 2014-2015 time frame and the Monaco memo.

Our source here is an 29 Oct 15 memorandum issued by the Obama White House and it’s complimented by an October 2015 report entitled Fast Track Action Committee Report: Recommendations on the Select Agent Regulations Based on Broad Stakeholder Engagement.

From the 29 Oct 15 memorandum, there is an attached “Tab A,” which contains an 18 Aug 14 memorandum co-issued by Lisa Monaco (Department of Homeland Security.) This memo advises all national labs/biocontainment facilities to conduct a “security stand down” within 30 days and curiously overlaps the 2014 Obama decision to end gain of function research in the U.S., as previously discussed. This would be followed by the 2015 off-shoring and funding (NIH) of gain of function (SARs-CoV-2?) research to the WIV in China.

Recall how they care to ship BSATs with the “lost in the crowd” approach?

Well, what if suddenly there were a biosecurity crisis because internal whistleblowers delivered revelations and shined the light on U.S. bio-warfare and gain of function research?

How could one manage that crisis without drawing attention to any one particular (or more) lab (scene(s) of the crime)?

Could one use the “lost in the crowd approach” to expand the crisis to all similar biocontainment facilities and therein attribute the reason to three unrelated cited incidents while also following through with the rules rewrite that began with the Bush EO; while at the same time compartmentalizing the fallout and damage by shutting it down and off-shoring it to China?

Could one do that essentially without losing a step and falling behind in the work?

The tactic is analogous to the concept of opening a federal investigation for the express purpose of vacuuming-up evidence to cover-up a crime rather than exposing the evidence and prosecuting the crime (defendants.)

I think that’s what they may have done here with the Monaco memo.

The Monaco memo further and conveniently includes directives for international collaboration and the use of multinational venues (venues would be labs.) Like labs in China?

The obvious million dollar question is whether the Monaco memo served as the false flag event to implement final biosecurity policy changes to loosen U.S. biosecurity systems and to permit the off-shoring of U.S. gain of function research (SARS-CoV-2?) to the WIV in China; while simultaneously concealing the evidence of it.

Following the Monaco Memo, we get the October 2015 Fast Track Action Committee Report: Recommendations on the Select Agent Regulations Based on Broad Stakeholder Engagement. That report continues to identify the same persisting biosecurity recommendations (problems.)

It will be important to weigh what was recommended v. what was considered but not recommended (or not not considered at all) (emphasis mine),

Gaps in the Select Agent RegulationsSome respondents believed that the potential risks posed by novel organisms and new techniques are significant and inadequately addressed by existing regulatory approaches. The rapid pace of advances in genetic engineering and molecular biology has lowered barriers to the ability of researchers to use recombinant technologies to potentially increase an organism’s virulence or synthesize a biological select agent de novo. The ability to translate biological data into digital form and back again raises questions about regulatory oversight measures, such as the SAR, that rely on the physical presence of a pathogen. It was argued that additional consideration should therefore be given to regulatory approaches that anticipate technological challenges and are flexible enough to keep pace with them.

As we consider the report’s Recommendations, we focus on items considered but omitted: 1) creating a uniform and robust federal biosecurity system (instead preferring to create a “task force” to further explore and make recommendations), 2) a second uniform federal system to vet personnel and determine personnel reliability (background investigations and clearances) and 3) constructing a direct safety and oversight program for bio-WMD and gain of function research specifically.

As for keeping the human element in tact – otherwise known as the barrier to fraud and more specifically as the 2-person bio-security measure – the report only mentioned it once buried in a section entitled “Summary Comments from Listening Sessions” in the sub-section “Gaps in the Overarching SAR Approach or Process.” Little of value was said.

BUSH EXECUTIVE ORDER 13486

Now, take what we know and apply it to the timeline presented below. We do this remembering that on 09 Jan 09, eleven days before his exit and Obama’s entry, George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13486, which,

“…established a Working Group (WG) co-chaired by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or their designees. Other members of the WG included designees of the Secretaries of State, Agriculture, Commerce, Transportation, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Directors of National Intelligence and the National Science Foundation, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Attorney General.”

That objective was to strengthen U.S. laboratory biosecurity.

What it really did was permit the incoming Obama administration the requisite mechanism to revamp U.S. biosecurity, which permitted the necessary and eventual 2015 off-shoring of GOF research to China.

Note a common theme occurring in statecraft where something specific will transit multiple presidential administrations. In these cases, there are tendencies for an outgoing president to function by executive order for the purpose of setting-up the incoming administration for particular vectors of work. This is a passive tactic to conceal evidence and attribution and divide the work to avoid having a single fall guy ergo it permits easier hand washing and deniability.

Building on the aforementioned executive order, consider this broader timeline relative our established fact set and U.S. biosecurity more broadly.

This timeline information is exclusively sourced with (my emphasis) added,

1996: The select agent program launched by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, which prohibited the transfer of some “select” agents from one laboratory to another without registration with the CDC

2001: Anthrax letter attacks expose “a gap” in biosecurity.

2003: The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, along with the U.S. Patriot Act of 2001, led to a new select agent program (ushered in by 9/11?).

2003: In October 2003, the National Research Council published Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism, which is known as the Fink Report. The com­mittee described an initial set of seven types of experiments of concern that, while not prohibited, would merit review and discussion before being under­taken or published in detail.

2004: The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity was established in 2004 as a federal advisory committee and has been chartered continuously to date at two-year intervals by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The NSABB has offered guidance for handling dual-use re­search of concern (DURC), a modified form of the Fink Report’s experiments of concern, and has provided input on the publication of several papers in ad­dition to the H5N1 papers, including one on the reconstruction of the 1918 influenza virus, for which they recommended publication.

2008: World at Risk, the report of the Congressional Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism (WMD Commission), was released on December 2, 2008. In the report, the WMD Commission rec­ommended that the U.S. should “conduct a comprehensive review of the do­mestic program to secure dangerous pathogens, tighten government oversight of high-containment laboratories and promote a culture of security awareness in the life sciences community.”

2009: Working Group on Strengthening the Biosecurity of the United States report re­leased on October 23, 2009; established by Executive Order 13486, which was signed on January 9, 2009, by George W. Bush.

2009: National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Report: Enhancing Personnel Reliability among Individuals with Access to Select Agents released April 30, 2009

2009: The Trans-Federal Task Force on Optimizing Biosafety and Biocontainment Oversight, co-chaired by HHS and USDA, released a report that examined gaps in the oversight framework for laboratories and options for improvement to biocontainment oversight. Among its recommendations: there should be training standards and core competencies for personnel at high and maxi­mum containment research laboratories, and there should be a phased-in re­quirement for credentialing of biosafety professionals at high and maximum containment laboratories.

2009: Defense Science Board task force report Biological Safety and Security Program for Research Involving Biological Select Agents and Toxins publicly released May, 2009. They identi­fied areas for action, including computer security enhancements such as video monitoring of laboratory workers, which they determined to be superior to the “two-person rule,” transporting pathogens with a “lost in the crowd” approach vs. a two-person escort; and avoiding security measures that are significantly detrimental to the mission, particularly for overseas laboratories.

2009: Government Accountability Organization (GAO) report High Containment Laboratories: Issues related to Oversight released in September 2009.

2009: National Research Council (National Academy of Sciences) report Responsible Research with Biological Select Agents and Toxins Released.

2009: National Strategy for Countering Biological Threats released November 2009. The strategy includes a series of objectives that are intended to “protect against the misuse of the life sciences to develop or use biological agents to cause harm.”

2010: Executive Order 13546, Optimizing the Security of Biological Select Agents and Toxins in the United States, was released on July 2, 2010. The EO stated that there was an “absence of clearly defined, risk-based security measures” for the select agent program, which “has raised concern about the need for optimized security and for risk management.”

2011: On June 13, 2011, the federal experts security advisory panel released Recommendations Concerning the Select Agent Program, as called for in EO 13546. It created a tier 1 of pathogens and recommended that 25 pathogens be removed from the select agent list. The panel also recommended the removal of a number of animal and human pathogens from the select agents list and recommended against the inclusion of SARS.

OBAMA EXECUTIVE ORDER 13546

On 02 July 10, Obama issued EO 13546 and on 13 Jul 11, as noted in the timeline above, federal experts were responsive to it with their report entitled ‘Federal Experts Security Advisory Panel Recommendations Concerning the Select Agent Program.’

Buried at the bottom of this report are two footnotes (emphasis mine).

The first footnote reads, “Revised 1/10/11: Recommendation regarding inclusion of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus on the list of BSAT.”

The second footnote provides an enormous plot shift in this drama and it reads, “The FESAP does not recommend inclusion of SARS on the list of BSAT.”

That’s right. After all of the designed uncertainty and years of discourse, committees, indecisiveness, lack of clarity, bullshit vernacular and more; and all over biosecurity and the bickering over which systems and guardrails are best, rather than combining them all into one comprehensive and robust biosecurity system, Obama’s executive order took the additional step of recommending the removal of SARS from the BSAT list.

Does that equate to a deliberate maneuver to avert active surveillance on gain of function research on SARS and does that include SARS-CoV-2?

Here’s a reminder about SARS: the entire COVID-19 pandemic is a fraudulent construct resting on a platform of propagated infection and mortality from SARS-CoV-2; the same SARS Obama sought to have removed.

I believe we’ve uncovered the broader basis – and the cover-up mechanism – for the ending of gain of function research in the U.S., its off-shoring and funding to China and as attributable on a timeline extending from George H.W. Bush through Joe Biden and with Anthony Fauci as the bridge linking them all start to finish.

No wonder Joe Biden shut down the investigation into the genesis of COVID-19.

If the rules are inconvenient, just change them.

-End-

SOURCES: ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN ELEVEN

A Carve-out Is Being Made in the Broader COVID-19 Narrative

There is a carve-out being made in the broader COVID-19 narrative and it’s a slick approach that to some extent is sure to gain traction and be effective. The carve-out is a typical blend of information, misinformation and disinformation including appetizing talking points that will unfortunately appease a segment of the population seeking real answers.

Wall Street Journal

That population segment could likely be characterized as MAGA/Trump supporters who have doubts about COVID-19 but consume primarily mainstream media sources.

Wall Street Journal

Unfortunately, as satisfying and “I told you so” as the answers they receive may be and to the extent that this segment becomes effectively appeased, these folks will only be receiving just enough of the truth to get them to believe the balance of it all and wherein the sowers have enmeshed the misinfo/disinfo in the parts that taste best.

Our source linked at the bottom is the Wall Street Journal and it explores the importance and relativity of an abandoned mine (think bat feces) associated with the WIV. They almost got it right when they speculated to pin attribution for the pandemic on Chinese internal lab sloppiness.

It wasn’t Chinese sloppiness; however, rather it was Chinese bio-warfare.

That the Wuhan Institute of Virology is a CCP/PLA facility bears down fully and as I’ve asserted dating back for over a year, we’ve been in an undeclared World War III since at least Oct 2019, as previously demonstrated and relative to the existence of the November 13, 2019 FBI Tactical Intelligence report serving as the source of the time frame.

Now consider that in the broader scope of things, a carve-out is being made within the narrative to attribute the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic directly to China, but characterized as internal lab sloppiness. This approach stands a real chance of appeasing low information consumers.

The carve-out permits China to use a fraudulent narrative to characterize as “accidental” and fully compartmentalize the culpability for an asymmetrical strike; a strike that is comprised of an act of war by means of the the release of a bio-WMD. It was an act of war designed to launch a fraudulent pandemic devised to begin the destruction of America from the inside-out.

In so doing, this carve-out will attribute China’s asymmetrical bio-warfare strike to a narrative of fraudulent lab sloppiness permitting China to further enshroud its broader construct that included leveraging a deep and broad infiltration of America’s institutions to remove a sitting U.S. president, overthrow the U.S. government and insert a Chinese proxy into the White House in Joe Biden.

This carve-out will also permit China to directly control the narrative, which answers a question some readers are sure to have – Why would China assume responsibility for the release of the bio-WMD (they won’t call it that but the FBI did)?

By assuming responsibility for the “leak” from it’s CCP/PLA WIV, China removes the U.S. from the dialogue and positions itself to take a full and commanding lead in controlling the narrative as it explains exactly how the “leak” occurred. Within this explanation, China can fabricate whatever story line and evidence it needs to serve it accordingly and it will do so with the WHO (and the CDC, NIH, NIAID) in its back pocket and with the U.S. otherwise left impotent. Those entities are sure to toe the Chinese company line.

Sure, China takes a hit but a self-imposed hit placed exactly where you want it and with full control over everything associated with it is a solid bet – just ask those Americans incriminated in the events of 9/11 and what that event has permitted them to do to the American people. Even more so for China, the feel especially emboldened since its proxy Joe Biden is already installed and positioned to drive it home.

China is betting this allows them to avoid taking WWIII hot (for the time being as Taiwan still looms) but achieving a similar result – global dominance.

From the WSJ, here’s what James LeDuc had to say about it all.

Wall Street Journal

This is James LeDuc who gives the appearance of being a bought and paid for Fauci lackey; #FalseFlagFauci, that is.

The Liberty Beacon (click to read)

Look back-up at LeDuc’s statement above and specifically the last line about following the science. Then be reminded of what I offered up the other day.

A carve-out is being made in the narrative attributing the COVID-19 outbreak to Chinese internal lab sloppiness. That’s Kool-Aid induced inebriation, folks, because what we’ve endured is an asymmetrical bio-WMD strike in an undeclared World War III.

Paging President Trump and his rebuilt military.

-End-

SOURCE/WALL STREET JOURNAL