Flatten the Curve Forever

The full scope of Moonshine work dedicated to COVID-19 can be characterized as a wide-spectrum forensic examination of deep, complex, enmeshed and entangled open-source evidence. Every investigation culminates in a written report containing summary findings. The summary findings in any such report present in a variety of contexts and categories.

Introduction and Construct

The fraudulent construct itself requires understanding in order to consume and position this historical analysis appropriately. The lens for comprehension is provided by RICO statue, which affords legal definitions and qualifies individuals, entities, the Criminal Enterprise, et al for prosecution.

RICO is the U.S. code for high-value fraud and racketeering crimes and it applies to the COVID construct and its purveyors. Under RICO, the fraudulent construct is organized and operated by a Criminal Enterprise that is a basic analog for President Trump’s COVID-19 Task Force extended.

The Criminal Enterprise exploits an organizational and closed-loop system of data curation and propagation that compartmentalizes criminality and culpability to propagate fraudulently constructed data for gain.

The data is specifically derived by harvesting it from a data reservoir of co-morbidity pathogens and illnesses that mostly occur on an annual and seasonal basis: flu/pnuemo, diabetes, heart disease and obesity.

To propagate a fraudulent pandemic capitalizing on data harvested mostly from a flu and pneumonia reservoir, the Criminal Enterprise is required to introduce a new pathogen for two specific purposes.

The first purpose for the Criminal Enterprise to introduce a new pathogen was to introduce one that mirrored the symptoms of the primary co-morbidities being harvesting. Think of this as apples to apples and further that it would be more difficult to sell stolen oranges as apples.

From the co-morbidity harvesting standpoint and the requirement for an apples to apples pathogen, SARS-CoV-2 was the ideal apple to apple new pathogen candidate.

The second purpose for the Criminal Enterprise to introduce a new pathogen was to permit the Criminal Enterprise to meet the legal demands and requirements that are necessary to make both a pandemic declaration and the resulting declaration for a national emergency.

The national emergency declaration is required to trigger the usurpation of the President’s Title II Executive emergency authority by drawing it into conflict with the legal concept of “presidential competence,” which compels the President to defer to field experts if the emergency exists outside the scope of his knowledge and expertise [Stafford Act.]

An influenza pandemic meets this demand perfectly because President Trump is neither a virologist or epidemiologist or other.

The enforcement mechanism for this “presidential competence” construct is the 25th Amendment and the pretext for it existed in abundance drawing back to before Trump’s inauguration in 2017. Had the President defied his experts, who are the Criminal Enterprise, the Criminal Enterprise would have leveraged the 25th Amendment to remove him. The stolen 2020 election eventually accomplished this objective.

Harvesting co-morbidity data from a seasonal reservoir of primarily flu/pneumo data occurs by two primary methods further explained below: PCR testing/high cycle thresholds and a series of diagnostic memos issued by the National Vital Statistics System.

Both are data drivers functioning as redundant control systems inside this closed-loop construct.

The data drivers serve to manufacture or construct “new cases” by 1] exploiting known vulnerabilities with PCR testing calibrated with high cycle threshold values, which creates the very specific net effect of generating false positive test results in abundance and 2] by the literal steering of diagnoses to COVID by the language issued in the NVSS memos that also financially incentivized COVID diagnoses. The language of the memos basically places all of flu season in the COVID diagnosis box, so to speak.

The construct’s design situates the seasonal data reservoirs for co-morbidity harvesting such that they are only available for harvesting during the times when those pathogens naturally occur. That mostly coincides with peak flu season, which makes it seasonal, and therefore it places firm boundaries on the construct while also making the Criminal Enterprise predictable in ways that can be confirmed with empirical and other data points.

The CDC defines peak flu as beginning every 01 Dec and running for two months.

The definition of “COVID season” applies to this annual and seasonal period of peak flu and the data reservoir provided by it.

Impacting the “COVID season” is the annual and seasonal die-off period for the primary co-morbidities being harvested, flu and pneumonia. This occurs primarily in the spring into summer and again, it provides firm boundaries on the construct and lends towards evidenced predictability.

During this seasonal time, the construct incurs the annual die-off of the co-morbidities available for harvesting in the peak flu data reservoir [flu/pneumo.]

This requires the construct to have a bridge that serves to drive the pandemic through the seasonal die-off periods and circumvent the loss of those harvested pathogens.

The bridge’s primary function is span the gap of the seasonal die-off and bridge the construct from the current peak flu reservoir to the next consecutive peak flu reservoir. This design inside the construct is a perpetual one.

There are four basic identifiable COVID seasons understanding that it is open ended after the third. This is accounted for by the 40,000 SARS-CoV-2 variants that are already contained in U.S. patent filings and available to be used in the way variants are used as described below.

The identifiable COVID seasons are 1] late 2019 after the first outbreak and until the seasonal die-off in spring/summer 2020; 2] peak flu 2020-2021; 3] the coming peak flu 2021-2022 and 4] open-ended from the projected peak flu 2022-2023 and forward as determined by the existence and availability of 40,000 identifiable SARS-CoV-2 variants to the construct of perpetual design.

In 2020, the bridge linking the pandemic construct from the 2019-2020 peak flu reservoir to the 2020-2021 peak flu reservoir occurred when the Criminal Enterprise moved the benchmark pandemic measurement from mortality data [deaths], which was in decline at the time, to infection data or “new cases.”

This new fraudulent measurement of “new cases” was made from thin air and was driven by political pretext narrative beginning in early 2020 and calling for an exponential increase in COVID testing [PCR/CT] that delivered a hockey-stick growth data line in mid-April 2020.

The data drivers [PCR/CT and NVSS memos] that the construct requires present as redundant control systems allowing the Criminal Enterprise to shape the pandemic and determine how, when and where it occurs.

The data drivers are specifically and fraudulently constructed to steer medical diagnoses and all COVID data to COVID over other causes. In addition to determining the parameters for data input, curation, output and propagation within an organizational and closed loop system, the Criminal Enterprise also financially incentivized the steered diagnoses with federal dollars.

In 2021, the bridge to link the pandemic construct from the 2020-2021 peak flu reservoir to the coming 2021-2022 peak flu reservoir was predicted in writing on 30 Nov 20 and empirically confirmed with CDC data in January 2021 and again in March 2021.

This 2021 bridge is the leveraging of the “variant” and it can be seen currently dominating legacy media headlines and CDC advisement. This is occurring exactly how, when, where and why predicted.

The construct is troubled by a problematic data point from the CDC in that 2020 was only the 12th deadliest year contemporarily. This data point evidences the means, motive, opportunity and intent in moving the benchmark pandemic measurement from mortality to “new cases” in mid-April 2020. Simply stated, the mortality data stood entirely antithetical to the narrative; so they moved the measurement to circumvent the impediment.

This spiraled into additional problems that unfold in the historical analysis that follows including two bulk revisions in August of 2020 and May of 2021 where the CDC revised away 94% and 95% of sole cause COVID mortality data. That was the same data used to predicate the declaration of a national emergency and the declaration of the now perpetual state of emergency.

Everything resulting from the COVID pandemic occurs under the guise and within the parameters of a national emergency declaration and the fraudulently constructed predicate that authorizes it.

Understanding that the Criminal Enterprise has only issued recommendations for mitigations and guidelines, federalism is bent back on the American people as the construct’s enforcement mechanism. The construct provides the authority for the governors to serve as enforcers and from there, the construct gets infused into every single granular aspect of American life dependent upon the governor.

Therefore, the fraudulent data and the authority derived from it permits governors to literally shape how the pandemic occurs in their respective states. This stands entirely antithetical to the notion of the pandemic, as caused by the disease, occurring naturally and according to geographic areas as determined by population density and other important factors; and not political considerations and gubernatorial discretion. Simply, viruses are apolitical.

Additional considerations impacting the construct include but aren’t limited to 1] the experimental mRNA vaccines, 2] emerging research into their detrimental side effects, 3] the highly transmissible rate of the SARS virus, 4] the phenomenon of breakthrough cases exceeding cases in the unvaccinated that the CDC negligently and deliberately fails to report [VAERS], 5] the occurrence of positive HIV cases following injection, 6] the occurrence of antibody dependence enhancement syndrome, 7] the concept of the vaccines potentially being self-replicating, 8] the occurrence of compromised immune and reproductive systems, 9] the occurrence of significant neurological vaccine side effects, 10] the emerging requirement for perpetual booster injections, 11] the stated plans to produce vaccines for every variant [40,000 on file] within 95 days, 12] medical research evidences likely confirmation that mRNA vaccines permanently alter DNA, and 13] others.

These features above evidence the perpetual, endless and cyclical nature of a fraudulent construct that stands to deliver exponential amounts of financial profit for the Criminal Enterprise, “Big Pharma,” and others. The fraud is copious and evident.

The remainder of this article equates to the report’s historical analysis in the summary findings and is presented as a chronological narrative. It is entirely comprehensive in delineating how the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COIVD-19 pandemic were fraudulently brought into existence with a genesis in 1942.

It will rely on the construct information just outlined to reinforce meaning and understanding.

Historical Analysis by Era

The remaining scope of the article is a massive undertaking more suitable for a book and it presents in incomplete form.

The beginning for the timeline draws back to 1942 and World War II era Nazi Germany. Special focus is on the Bush family and specifically, Prescott Bush and George H.W. Bush.

The evidence cements George H.W. Bush as the launch point for a generational effort to overtake and come to possess and control the federal apparatus of the United States. This broadly occurred by means decades-long infiltration and subversion of U.S. institutions.

It also includes state governors right down to county and local officials and back up through the entire federal apparatus. The federal apparatus and its institutions include all of the unelected bureaucrats; some of whom essentially serve lifetime appointments without ever being elected. The Senior Executive Services is a prime example here.

The evidence demonstrates that this long-tenured overtake qualifies for abject treason in the context of an ongoing, undeclared, asymmetrical and irregular third world war that began in October 2019.

Within the war context, a criminal conspiracy is being executed by a Criminal Enterprise as defined under RICO statute. The criminal conspiracy is the fraudulent propagation of the COVID-19 pandemic using constructed data harvested from an average of 4.0 underlying co-morbidities [flu/pneumo, diabetes, heart disease and obesity.] It served to 1] remove one president, 2] by permitting the theft of an election, 3] to install another president as a Chinese proxy while 4] ushering-in a global system of technocratic enslavement at the hands of a Globalist Criminal Enterprise closely focused on the U.S.

The dominant and forceful roles of China, the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army, as we view them today, are primarily fighting this undeclared war and driving the fraudulent pandemic that caused it, but the origins draw back to 1942 Germany.


During World War II, the architects of the Nazi party were funded by Prescott Bush, the father of the late George H.W. Bush [41] and the grandfather of George W. Bush [43.] Drawing on established work and quoting The Guardian, consider that,

“George Bush’s grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.
The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

His business dealings, which continued until his company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of pre-election controversy.

The evidence has also prompted one former US Nazi war crimes prosecutor to argue that the late senator’s action should have been grounds for prosecution for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.”

Prescott Bush establishes deep Nazi roots reach through the entire COVID construct.

Following World War II, the U.S. Department of State facilitated the immigration of Nazi war criminals to the United States under the guise of recruiting Germany’s best and brightest scientific minds across the full spectrum of science, government, engineering, etc. Werhner von Braun is perhaps the most well-known of these individuals and was responsible for thrusting forward to preeminent status U.S. programs in aerospace and rocket development.

In fact and to ensure that Nazi war criminals would clear the immigration process, the State Department constructed fraudulent immigration dossiers permitting these Nazi war criminals and others to immigrate unfettered during Operation Paperclip and otherwise.

American politicians, bureaucrats and officials were then positioned to coalesce with and be fully informed by the masterminds behind Nazi regime. They were positioned to learn all of the finer details of the Nazi regime’s capabilities to effectuate change by leveraging the political system to assume total control the of German government making it a totalitarian and authoritarian one. The effort was laden with political tactics and propaganda.

American governmental officials were positioned to acquire and learn all they needed to control an entire population with established and effective Nazi tactics and propaganda techniques that prey on feeble-mindedness and disrupt or prevent independent and critical thinking by the people.

The division of the populace serves to divide it and to permit each side to impose and enforce its doctrine on the other. Such division can permit a small enterprise of people and entities to overcome an entire population to control it in authoritarian and totalitarian style. The contemporary mask/no mask, vaccine/no vaccine dynamic evidences this precisely.

Evidence shows that misinformation and disinformation tactics aggravate and exacerbate that the COVID pandemic. In a direct overlay, to the Criminal Enterprise has routinely issued advisement, guidelines, mitigations, information and data causing a 20-month long and continual moving of the goal posts [masking, quarantining, vaccination, etc.]

It has resulted in a perpetual swirling pool of ever-changing and contradictory positions and advisement that even stand antithetical to established science.

Within the COVID parameters, Anthony Fauci’s long and documented history of self-contradiction and contradictory advisement on COVID guidelines and mitigations is the perfect example. Fauci qualifies for immediate arrest and prosecution under RICO.

Of particular importance in the swirling pool of misinformation/disinformation underpinning the sown COVID division is how American officials were positioned to learn from the Nazi regime how to create a fog of war and uncertainty to cause the people writ large to stand-down to something like the extermination of millions Jews and countrymen in concentration camps during the Nazi era or SARS-CoV-2 as a dual use pathogen [bio-WMD, BSAT pathogen] and the mRNA vaccine as another likely bio-WMD.

Further evidence for this can be found in the documented depopulation and extermination angles that are particularly concerning in light of the disputed data and research findings demonstrating mRNA vaccine side effects that are significant, permanent, genetic and deadly.

Direct parallels between Nazi era techniques, tactics and propaganda are unmistakable when viewed through an objective and impartial lens; with the engineered insanity of mask/no mask and vaccine/no vaccine as prime examples. The direct overlay in identical symbolism between Nazi era propaganda and the brown shirts and as compared to contemporary Antifa are unmistakable and to the extent it gives the appearance of funding and branding.

Prescott Bush and his funding of the Nazi party during the 1940s helped open the door for the U.S. government to be infiltrated and subverted across the board and in all of the requisite institutions and places. It was a decades-long process and it was paralleled by Chinese infiltration in the same capacity.

The direct tie-in for the Bush family and China precisely focuses on George H.W. Bush.


Advancing to 1960-1961, Prescott Bush’s son, the late 41st U.S. President George H.W. Bush, began covertly working for the CIA using his Texas-based oil business as cover.

This is understood against the backdrop of a fundamental position that the present COVID landscape is the product of a rogue intelligence community that threads to the Executive through the legislative branch by means of the corrupt intelligence committees in the House and Senate – the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence [HPSCI] and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence [SSCI].

Stringing 1942 to the present requires staying latched-on to the HPSCI, the SSCI and the intelligence community writ large. Bush’s ascendance through the intelligence community and to the Executive accounts for the current American landscape from 1942 to the events of 9/11 and forward to COVID-19. All of it derives from intelligence community.

George H.W. Bush’s beginnings at the CIA overlapped his introduction to politics in Texas in 1963 when he was elected chairman of the Harris County (Texas) Republican Party.

In a 29 Nov 63 FBI memorandum issued by Director J. Edgar Hoover, it advises that following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas on 23 Nov 63, Bush was briefed on the matter in his capacity as a covert CIA operative.


Bush formally entered the CIA during the 1970s and at a tumultuous time when morale was low, revamping was necessary and the agency was ripe for change; whether that be for good or bad.

Bush ascended to the CIA’s directorship being sworn-in on 30 Jan 76 before exiting to eventually become Vice President of the United States under President Ronald Reagan. Bush’s vice presidency began in January 1981 and he served accordingly for Reagan’s two terms through January 1989.

Bush went on to succeed Reagan becoming the 41st President of the United States and serving one term. There he enjoyed the full slate of influence, access and capabilities permitted by occupying the Executive Branch from January 1989 to January 1993.

Bush was the only U.S. president to serve as both president and CIA director. This positioned him as the genesis for the intelligence community as it would come to intersect the Executive and thread the entire COVID construct top to bottom.

One of Bush’s primary directorship objectives and accomplishments, which substantiates our positions on the intelligence community, HPSCI and SSCI, pertains to the “restoration” of the relationship between the CIA and Congress.

In July of 1976, the SSCI became operational to provide it “vigilant legislative oversight over the intelligence activities of the United States.” This deliberate confluence of Congress and the intelligence community destroyed any sense of the CIA operating outside of political influence and the pressures that emanate from it.

Therein, Bush courted U.S. senators and held private dinners with SSCI members while providing them a comprehensive briefing of CIA covert action programs. This occurred at the same time that agency officials educated committee members about intelligence collection and production methodology.

Coming into the CIA’s directorship in 1976, Bush had previously served as the Chief of the U.S. Liaison Office in China between 1974-1976. This positioned Bush to begin collaborating with the Chinese while enjoying full Title II Executive authority when he served his one term as president beginning in 1989.

As CIA director, Bush embraced the power and effectiveness of the PDB and paired it with his demand for a direct interface with then President Ford. This intersection accounts for the intelligence community’s ability to effectively impact the Executive and caused the CIA to become an indelible factor and variable to wield considerable weight and capabilities in the governance of the United States foreign and domestically.

The CIA is not authorized to operate domestically on Americans except where authorized in limited cases. Therefore the CIA’s directives have it operational outside of the U.S. and therefore it becomes a perfectly situated as collaborator with any willing hostile nation seeking to overthrow the U.S., like China.

The presidential/CIA portal that Bush created is responsible for the lion’s share of travesties and abuses coming from the federal apparatus. For one example, consider former Obama CIA Director John Brennan’s ability to launder the fraudulent Steele Dossier into a reliable intelligence product suitable for dissemination simply by including it in the President’s Daily Brief. GHWB created that capability.

When Bush was inaugurated as the 41st president in January of 1989 his roots were already deeply entangled with the Nazis, the intelligence community and China.

Bush would later write his book ‘The China Diary of George H.W. Bush — The Making of a Global President,’ which coincided with the ascendance of Barack Obama to the presidency in 2008 and heading into the 2009 January inauguration.

Historical evidence positions George H.W. Bush as the container for the U.S., the Executive, the CIA, the intelligence community, the Nazi Party and China as interfaced with Congress.

This relationship is interfaced contemporarily with what President Trump has branded Big Money, Big Media and Big Tech. Those corporate vectors and their complicit entities become enmeshed in the construct and individuals within them are found in the Criminal Enterprise.

The corporate entities all further draw back primarily to two private equity holding companies – BlackRock and Vanguard Group.

From this single point GHWB origin and in linear fashion, everything converges forward on a generational political continuum. Therefore, every consecutive presidency from GHWB through Biden should be viewed as an installed administration serving as a functionary on that continuum. The only notable exception was Donald Trump and one notable addition is Hillary Clinton.

This dynamic was on full display during the GHWB state funeral in 2018 and all of the obvious palpable tension and peculiarities that occurred between the Trump cohort and all of the others present [Bushes, Obamas, Clintons, Bidens, Cheneys, etc.]

By all accounts, Clinton was the presumed winner before the 2016 election was un-rigged to permit a legitimate Trump victory. This complicates attempts at understanding how and why the 2020 election was permitted to be stolen and it begs the question as to why the same forces of good that un-rigged 2016 didn’t secure 2020?

A previous hardline position in this investigative work was the Biden inauguration on 20 Jan 21. Once President Trump eclipsed that line and vacated office, fundamental positions had to be reassessed and remain incomplete and uncertain.

All evidence prior to that suggested the President would redress the stolen election and the fraudulent COVID pandemic prior to Biden being inaugurated. Explanations are hard to formulate outside of proprietary knowledge.

One explanation is offered by proprietary information obtained from defamation attorney Lin Wood. This information was obtained in the period after the stolen 2020 election and before the 20 Jan 21 inauguration.

Recall that Mr. Wood spent roughly a week with attorney Sydney Powell and Lt. General Michael Flynn and was privy to an abundance of evidence. In those meetings he learned of two retaliatory threats that were on the table should the Trump administration push back on the stolen election: 1) a viral compromise of the nation’s water supply and 2) the detonation of an EMP over the Midwest that would collapse supply chains and according to reliable research, would eventually result in 90% of the population perishing.

Aggravating the stolen election was the stand-down by Trump’s Attorney General William Barr, who previously served under George H.W. Bush and issued written statements following the election saying the stolen 2020 election would not be investigated.

Notably and in between his two stints as the AG, Barr served at Kirkland and Ellis when the firm advised Staple Street Capital on its acquisition of Dominion Voting Systems. The acquisition permitted the transfer of 18 intellectual property patents that represented the capabilities to exploit Dominion’s engineered and deliberate vulnerabilities to permit hacking elections to determine results remotely. Those patents flowed to China through HSBC Toronto Bank in Canada.

We view this as one reason Barr stood down on the election and acknowledge the direct tie back to GHWB.

Compounding this dynamic is that during this time, President Trump was being poorly advised to his own detriment to the detriment of the nation as a whole. This includes one of three primary confirmation sources for work in this report. That source contact occurred indirectly, in limited fashion and only presented in a downstream flow of information – Pat Cipollone.

Evidence therefore suggests that in combination with bad advisement from a wide slate of counsel and cabinet members, Trump determined that it was in the nation’s best interest for him to diverge from plans and then vacate the Executive. This decision accounts for how the status quo has been reached.

Trump’s decision also caused him to cede all of its Title II executive authority and his positions as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer and the Commander in Chief to the military. He ceded all of this to his political rivals and domestic and foreign enemies that include hostile nations; and with China at the forefront.

This has resulted in a Biden proxy administration in servitude to the CCP and China and the evidence of this is in full display in headlines from 20 Jan 21 to now.

One example of this is the historical conflict with U.S. infrastructure relative to Mike Pompeo’s advisement that China had evaluated a full slate of U.S. entities and institutions including education, politicians, governors, etc., as being “friendly” or not towards China.

Evidence of this is found in how federalism is being bent back against Americans as the enforcement mechanism for the COVID construct. Here, Pompeo’s words are evidenced in work overlaying multiple maps to isolate redundant geographic locations.

The overlay work demonstrated that the pandemic occurs differently in different states, in a wide number of ways and as determined by location: 2016 election, 2020 election, COVID mitigation enforcement, infection risk, U.S. Islamic mosque distribution, U.S. Islamic network distribution, Facebook/Cytl donations, precinct and state level election fraud and George Soros prosecutorial candidate funding. Those overlays produced redundant locations in multiple contexts that tie to federal funding, discretionary federal funding, federal grants, competitive federal grants, etc.

In total, we position many politicians as being compromised by China; especially the ones who publicly stood antithetical to Trump for his first term and refused to work with him. Therein, they specifically refused to do an infrastructure bill with the President despite his willingness to engage in heavy spending.

This is critically important relative to Chinese doctrine and its application to the U.S.

Immediately following Biden’s inauguration, the U.S. infrastructure bill became a top priority. The noted importance is found in Chinese doctrine and specifically China’s One Belt, One Road. In it, there are two primary arms and two primary interfaces.

The two primary arms include the political arm of the Chinese Communist Party and the economic arm, which is the CEFC, a now defunct Chinese energy company. They are further detailed below.

The two interfaces for One Belt, One Road are energy, which applies directly to the CEFC and accounts for the mechanism to flow of money through a conduit, and infrastructure. In 2013, Hunter Biden will sign a $1.5 billion deal with the CEFC.

Infrastructure accounts for China’s approach, ability and mechanism to effectuate political change in society. Therein, infrastructure bills become the container for the laws, policies, regulations, etc. that exist outside of conventional infrastructure and permit these designed changes. The entire bedrock for effectuating this change is found embedded in infrastructure.

Compounding this is the fact that the Democrats constructed infrastructure bill appears nothing like conventional infrastructure and appears like infrastructure coming from China.

The net effect is that Biden’s infrastructure bill will result in the direct application of Chinese political doctrine to the U.S. Therefore, infrastructure is an identifiable and tangible mechanism to deliver Marxist communism to the U.S. government and change it accordingly.

Evidence suggests that had the election not been un-rigged, infrastructure would have occurred under Clinton beginning in 2016.

This unanticipated Trump victory interceded on that and served as a four year interruption and impediment to the objectives of the Criminal Enterprise. The current landscape represents these objectives on an expedited timeline as the Criminal Enterprise works to get back on its original schedule.

All of this evidences how President Trump was the only outlier in the entire post-GHWB line of presidencies and the Criminal Enterprise never anticipated this. All of the ensuing post-2016 insanity through the present has been an engineered Deep State/China backlash to this occurrence designed to expedite the interrupted timeline.

Returning to the timeline, in 1993, Bill Clinton was inaugurated as the 42nd President of the United States succeeding GHWB. The broader effort to remake U.S. biosecurity began its first phases in 1999 during the Clinton presidency. That effort then transited to the 2000s and into the presidency of Bush 43 – George W. Bush.

The late 1990s road to Bush 43 was paved with critical U.S. patent filings that bear down on COVID and SARS-CoV-2. 4,000 U.S. patent filings were forensically examined by Dr. David Martin of MCAM respective to SARS-CoV-2.

Martin’s examination reveals that the first patent filings on coronavirus gene sequences with 99% identity to SARS-CoV-2 [the COVID-19 virus] and that were attributed to the claimed “novel” aspect of SARS-CoV-2, actually date back to 1999.

In fact, the paper routinely used to identify SARS-CoV-2 and evidence the asserted “novel” aspects does not account for the fact that there are 73 U.S. patents that issued for SARS-CoV-2 between 2008-2019. Those patents contain all of the elements that were allegedly “novel” in SARS-CoV-2.

Specifically, the patents also relate to the polybasic cleavage site, the Ace-2 binding domain and the S-1 spike protein now familiar in the broader COVID dialogue.

These patent filings put the SARS gene sequence in the public domain for over two decades and they eviscerate any “novel” claims used to evidence the fraudulent pandemic now. This will become problematic for patent filings in 2006 and 2007 as detailed below.

Up to 1999, coronavirus patenting activity was exclusively applied to the veterinary sciences and on 28 Jan 00, Pfizer filed for the first ever coronavirus vaccine specifically for the S-spike protein.

Ultimately, the filing was issued as U.S. patent 6372224, which was the spike protein virus vaccine for the canine coronavirus, which is one of the multiple forms of coronavirus.

This early work up to 1999 was largely based on Ralph Baric’s work with rabbits at the University of North Carolina and it interfaced with Pfizer’s canine coronavirus work to develop S-protein spike target candidates.

In 1999 and according to a patent application later filed 19 Apr 02, Anthony Fauci funded research at UNC Chapel Hill [Ralph Baric] that specifically created “an infectious replication defective coronavirus that was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.”

In other words, Fauci and Baric engineered a bio-WMD from SARS with gain of function work and it was patented on 19 Apr 02. This occurred before the first SARS outbreak in Asia, which followed several months later as detailed below.

That patent was issued as U.S. patent 7279327 and clearly lays-out very specific gene sequencing evidencing the fact that we knew that the Ace-2 receptor, the Ace-2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein and other elements associated with SARS were not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies.

The 1990s transitioned into the 2000s with the election of George W. Bush in 2000. Bush 43 was inaugurated as President of the United States in January 2001. Roughly 9 months later, the events of 9/11 unfolded as he was visiting a school and reading a book to elementary students.


The attacks of 11 Sep 01 occurred within the first year of the Bush 43 presidency and the evidence is clear – the universal laws of physics did not cease to exist in New York City on that day.

Therefore, the controlled demolition of Building 7 poisons the fruit of the entire 9/11 tree. It renders the narrative for that collapse and the collapse of the North and South towers; and the associated events in Pennsylvania and at the Pentagon, as patently fraudulent and unreliable.

Therefore, we dismiss the official narrative in lieu of explanations supported by physics, structural engineering, controlled demolition and large contingency of engineers and otherwise reliably and irrefutably evidencing this for over 20 years.

The 9/11 narrative remains at the forefront; however, encroaching on the 20th anniversary and all of the MSM narrative driving it; all coinciding with Biden’s catastrophic and calamitous exit from Afghanistan.

9/11 functioned to serve as the first major stage on the generational continuum to really cause Americans to stand-down writ large and acquiesce as subservient to authorities and those in government who sought to usher-in a technocratic surveillance state that violates myriad fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. In total, it manifests as a technocratic, authoritarian, dictatorial system functioning as a modern day form of enslavement.

As one example and by far not the most egregious one, Americans are subjected to gross rights violations when they tolerate physical pat-downs, x-ray imagery and warrant-less and unconstitutional searches before being permitted to board an airplane to travel.

Evidence suggests that out of fear for something mostly unfamiliar and unknown to them – Islamic terrorism – Americans acquiesced to forfeit fundamental rights, establish precedent, establish clear obedience and subservience and placed themselves on course for the type of geopolitical system required to leverage a fraudulent COVID pandemic today.

On an incremental and intermittent enforcement schedule unpacking on a long timetable, individual rights have been continually picked away at and removed. Obscene levels of engineered fear, terror and “lawfare” have been waged to accomplish this and especially in areas that interface broadly with the public, like general safety, healthcare and education.

A clear pattern of rights abuses is easily, irrefutably and undeniably evidenced to depict the fraudulent COVID-19 construct as the precise mechanism to finally and permanently remove all remaining individual rights, liberties and freedoms. This permits the application of the term ‘modern day form of enslavement’ by its literal definition.

In total, there is abundant evidence demonstrating the construction of an illegitimate and unconstitutional parallel government that is fraudulently predicated by a constructed and perpetual state of emergency.

As with the President’s emergency authority and how the Criminal Enterprise usurped it out of presidential competence, the perpetual state of emergency functions to permit agencies under the emergency umbrella to usurp the functions of other areas, offices and departments in the federal apparatus. Therein, they replace those policies and regulations with emergency ones that violate the Constitution.

As a direct result of this emerging unconstitutional and parallel government, FEMA stands to become the new executive branch that will rule by edict as predicated by a perpetual state of emergency.

The net effect has produced a conditioned populace that is becoming mostly dependent, accepting of substandard living and entirely subservient and craving the parameters and provisions that are being handed down by edict.

Compounding the problem is that due to infiltration and subversion, the people have few effective means by which to redress any grievances or infractions of rights outside of ineffective state, county and local ones.

Within the fog of these 9/11 attacks, the Anthrax scares in 2001 occurred and served to identify gaps in biosecurity that were leveraged to justify the implementation of a new BSAT program that launched in 2003. BSAT pathogens are dual use pathogens for both conventional good and nefarious bioweaponization purposes. They have special and stringent regulatory and oversight laws attached to them.

BSAT pathogens are also important in the sense that SARS-CoV-2 is, or was, a BSAT pathogen.

The peculiarities of 9/11 and its aftermath continued when in May 2002, Bush 43 appointed Dr. Elis Zerhouni, an Algerian-born radiologist, as the Director of the NIH; a position that is now occupied by Francis Collins. Algeria is a significant source of extreme Middle Eastern terrorism and ideology and it makes for a curious appointment.

Zerhouni served until 2008 as the Bush administration began to transition over to Barack Obama in January 2009.
As a 24-year old graduate student who immigrated to the United States, Zerhouni’s state of residence was Maryland and his entanglements include Johns Hopkins, specialities in magnetic resonance imaging relative to cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, and the pioneering of “magnetic tagging” in CT/MRI imagery.

Notably, Zerhouni entered the federal apparatus around the same time that Anthony Fauci ascended to the NIAID in 1984. Zerhouni came on to serve as an advisor to Reagan in 1985. As the nation’s highest paid official, Fauci entered the federal apparatus in the 1970s and has since served in an unelected capacity ever since.

In 1988, Zerhouni was a consultant to the WHO and he is further enveloped by other subsequent associations including but not limited to Research!America, The Mayo Clinic, the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia, the Maryland Economic Development Commission and Sanofi-Aventis.

Zerhouni was also a Senior Fellow at The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

In short, we consider the Algerian born U.S. immigrant Zerhouni to be the architect for the medical status quo that is the vehicle and the container for the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic construct today.

In May 2002, Zerhouni convened a series of meetings to map-out the “Roadmap for Medical Research.” It was devised to identify major opportunities and gaps in biomedical research suitable for a whole approach from the NIH rather than by an individual agency approach.

This roadmap determined the NIH’s research priorities in three areas: 1] new pathways, 2] future research teams and 3] re-engineering the clinical research enterprise. Consider it the foundational to revamping U.S. biosecurity writ large.

The following is critical as noted earlier.

Congress was responsive to Zerhouni’s NIH leadership in 2006 when it authorized and funded [NIH Common Fund, NIH Reform Act of 2006] the development of innovative and “cross-cutting programs.” This is critical relative to recent proprietary work intended to identify the list of the 37 hospitals that provide bulk COVID data to inform the Criminal Enterprise and steer its decisions on COVID mitigations, guidelines, etc.

Peculiarly and in troubling ways, the list of 37 data-providing hospitals can’t be specifically identified or located. This brings a cloud of suspicion to the data driving the COVID pandemic, the predication for the emergency and the issuance of guidelines and mitigations.

Therefore, the proprietary work in trying to identify this list rests on the issuance of discretionary federal funding and competitive grant awards as solely determined at the director/secretary level.

Evidence from the work suggests that all COVID data comes from 37 unknown hospitals that have been cleaved away, removed from and compartmentalized away from the normal 608 hospitals that regularly provide data to inform the CDC cohort.

We note the redundant compartmentalization as a continued hallmark indicator of fraud.

The suspected 37 hospital locations occur in urban hub locations, constitute an incomplete and not fully operational system, are not nationally representative of the nation as a whole and appear to be receiving discretionary federal dollars and discretionary competitive grants in exchange for fraudulently constructing COVID data for propagation purposes.

It should be noted that the 37 locations were distilled down from the list of 608 where some of the locations encompass multiple counties and even multiple states. Much more work is required to identify the list and track it to individual hospitals.

Zerhouni was the architect for this medical system and landscape, which was further bolstered by the passing of the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare in 2010.

Zerhouni’s initiative to promote “global health” and “global research” reads like a Globalist’s portal to entangle the U.S. with China and a host of other countries because it does. Consider this quote from Zerhouni in the spring 2008,

“Diseases know no borders anymore. SARS spread through the world in a matter of days. The dangers of fast-moving infectious diseases require us to have a global vision. Without a worldwide network of well trained, qualified scientific collaborators, we won’t have the radar to protect the American public from emerging and re-emerging infections, like pandemic flu. That’s why it was very important to increase our presence around the world.”

On 04 Jun 09 in a speech at Cairo University, Barack Obama declared a, “new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world.” Obama’s new Science Envoy program saw Zerhouni become the first U.S. science envoy to Islam where he visited Muslim-majority countries from North Africa to Southeast Asia.

With Zerhouni situated and returning to the timeline in 2003, we were focused the 9/11 aftermath and landscape.

In 2003 as noted earlier, the first SARS outbreak occurred and as per the CDC,

“According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with SARS during the 2003 outbreak. Of these, 774 died. In the United States, only eight people had laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV infection. All of these people had traveled to other parts of the world where SARS was spreading. SARS did not spread more widely in the community in the United States.”
Through Martin’s work forensically examining 4,000 U.S. patent filings at MCAM, we note the 2003 SARS outbreak as being the eventual blueprint for the 2019 outbreak. We also note that the pattern of RICO activity respective to SARS-CoV-2 began in April of 2003 and continues through to the present.”

28 Apr 03 is a problematic date for two reasons. Three days beforehand, the CDC would file for the patent on the SARS coronavirus. Then on the 28th, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, which was established in Maryland, filed a patent on antiviral agents in the treatment and control of coronavirus infections.

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals and ultimately Ablynx Pharmaceuticals became rolled into the proprietary private equity holdings of Pfizer, Crucell and Johnson & Johnson, the corporations deeply involved in SARS vaccines.

U.S. patent number 7151163 issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals is problematic because it was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was actually allowed. This completely and fully precludes anyone outside of the patent holders from accessing the information.

The CDC then paid to keep its information secretive, which is completely antithetical to its stated purpose for filing the patent, which was to promote research collaboration.

Around this same time in October of 2003, the Fink Report came out indicating the initial set of seven types of experiments of concern that included gain of function work. The report indicated that these practices were not actually prohibited by law. In 2004 the Fink Report was modified for more specific advice on dual use [BSAT] pathogens like SARS.

According to patent filings, by 2005, coronavirus was not only a highly malleable bioweapon, but it was the preferred one.

In 2006 and 2007 and as noted above, the CDC paid fines to overcome and keep secretive rejected SARS patent filings. Recall that those filings were initially rejected because the U.S. Patent Office found 99% identity in those gene sequences as already being in the public domain.

The CDC overrode the patent rejections and got the SARS patent in 2007.

Understanding that Sanofi is deeply entangled and ties right back to Zerhouni, on 05 Jun 08 and as coinciding with DARPA’s active interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon, Ablynx – now a part of Sanofi – filed a series of patents that specifically targeted the supposed “novel” feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Specifically they targeted the polybasic cleavage site for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and Ace-2 receptor binding domain alleged to be “novel.”
All of that was patented on 05 Jun 08 making none of it “novel” or “new” relative to the 2019 pandemic.

This is important because it ties directly back to the predicate for the declaration of the national emergency, which requires the pandemic outbreak to have a “novel” or new feature to it that presents as a new threat that can be isolated, identified, evidenced and supported by clear data.

Further complicating the notion of the declaration is the fact that there is no existing evidence for an isolated gene sequence for SARS-CoV-2 outside of what has been in the public domain for over two decades This means that the “pandemic” can not be directly and specifically attributed to something new, uniquely identifiable or threatening.

This eviscerates the predicate altogether ergo the emergency ergo the pandemic, which manifests entirely on a foundation of fraudulent data.

On 02 Dec 08, World at Risk – the report of the Congressional Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism (WMD Commission) recommended a comprehensive review of U.S. biosecurity.

This also draws back to Zerhouni’s medical architecture that he put in place and it envelops the Bush-Obama presidential transition period.

Most importantly, it represents the initial impetus to for the Obama administration to revamp U.S. biosecurity writ large and make it into a less robust system.

On 09 Jan 09 and some eleven days before Bush 43 would exit office, he by unilateral decree signed Executive Order 13486, which transited to the Obama Presidency and permitted Obama to begin the total revamp of biosecurity rules and protocols at all U.S. biocontainment facilities.

The net effect of remaking of U.S. biosecurity is that it was transitioned into a convoluted mess of ideas, concepts and word salad that moved fully in the direction of a significantly less robust and cloudier system rather than a more robust and clearer one.

During his two terms in office and aligning with his GHWB’s agenda, Bush 43 continued the disastrous series of wars in the Middle East and with Afghanistan looming largest and bearing down with full might.

Biden’s recent catastrophic and unilateral Afghanistan exit has consumed headlines as if it had been intentionally constructed to replenish the necessary Middle East boogeyman [Taliban, ISIS, ISIS-K, Al Qaeda, etc.] with arms while allowing the Criminal Enterprise to compartmentalize solely within Biden himself, all of the criminality, corruption and treason to-date before removing him with the 25th Amendment and pushing it all out the back door as positioned early in the work.

It is likely this will be confirmed if it isn’t by the time this report is read.

In January 2009, Obama was inaugurated as the 44th president and Joe Biden was elected his vice president. Upon entering office, Obama inherited two critical documents; the first one being EO 13486 as noted above.

Under Bush doctrine, the U.S. government perfected regime change overseas and especially in the Middle East. U.S. foreign regime change is effectuated by applying the second document that Obama inherited in 2009, which serves as the requisite blueprint – the 2009 U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide.

This also encompasses the technologies that were interceded on in the 2016 attempt at U.S. regime change but permitted the theft of the 2020 election – Hammer and Scorecard.

Evidence indicates that upon entering office Obama’s presidency immediately began applying the 2009 U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide and its assets and methodologies to map them over the U.S. This is occurred parallel to the Obama biosecurity rewrite authorized by the other inherited document, EO 13486.

This was done to effectuate permanent regime change in the U.S. It was also intended to transit to the presidency of Hillary Clinton, which was scheduled to begin in January 2017 and which was compromised and derailed when the 2016 election was un-rigged to permit Trump’s legitimate victory and establish him as a clear outlier presidency and immediate threat to the Criminal Enterprise that just lost complete control of the apparatus it has abused for decades.

The other intersecting fact here presents full circle and it is is the direct and immediate threat that incoming NSA Director Lt. General Michael Flynn presented.

Another presidential transit factor, Flynn transited from the Obama administration to the Trump administration bringing with him a full catalog of evidence and intelligence that stood to inform the incoming President Trump at the precise moment the outlier president was positioned to capitalize on his Title II Executive authority position as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer and the military’s Commander in Chief.

Therefore, un-tethering Flynn from Trump and compartmentalizing him with a constructed and fraudulent case managed by a corrupt and installed Judge Emmet Sullivan became the Criminal Enterprise’s highest and most critical priority.

This caused Flynn to supersede Trump in the Criminal Enterprise’s targeting priority making him the highest priority threat. Flynn represented a complete set of receipts standing to inform the President’s desire to target, prosecute and eliminate the Criminal Enterprise writ large and all of its complicit functionaries, entities and individuals. This is represented by his patented and publicly well-known “drain the swamp” promise.

Flynn was critical to the “drain the swamp” vector in all ways criminal, political, intelligence and military. Without Flynn and his full set of receipts, Trump’s ability to enforce the law was greatly impeded and that in and of itself explains the intent of the fraud behind the Flynn intersection.

This also explains why the Criminal Enterprise kept Flynn mired in litigation and indisposed for the entire first term.

The first document that Obama inherited from Bush 43, EO 13486, was leveraged by Obama to begin further revamping the entire U.S. biosecurity system writ large and in heavily consequential ways.

As per EO 13486 and on 23 Oct 09, the Working Group on Strengthening the Biosecurity of the U.S., which was the hand-picked cohort charged with determining the revamped U.S. biosecurity system, released its report. The report functioned to steer biosecurity in the direction of a less robust system clouded with word salad policies making it cloudier, grossly more inept and perfectly ripe for compromise.

Also transiting the Bush-Obama transition period is the peculiar dispatching of James LeDuc from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. In 2008, LeDuc was sent to advise upper echelon scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the area of biosecurity and this occurred contiguous to Obama’s first term beginning in January 2009.

LeDuc’s work equated to calibrating Chinese biosecurity with the new brand of less robust U.S. biosecurity. This appears to put both nations on the same platform permitting them to function similarly and interface conveniently in the areas of epidemiology, virology and biosecurity.

On 23 Mar 10, The Affordable Care Act [Obamacare] was passed and became law. It set the foundation and funding mechanisms to execute a fraudulent influenza pandemic driven by constructed data. In 2019, that manifested as COVID-19.

With biosecurity calibrated to the Chinese and the ACA in effect, on 02 Jul 10 Obama issued Executive Order 13546.

On 13 Jun 11 in a report that was responsive to this EO and entitled ‘Federal Experts Security Advisory Panel Recommendations Concerning the Select Agent Program’ [BSAT], the following recommendation was made – “The FESAP does not recommend the inclusion of SARS on the list of BSAT” [BSAT referring to dual use pathogens subject to enhanced biosecurity measures and oversight.]

This bears a fundamental question – If SARS is so dangerous in 2019-2021, why in 2010 did Obama issue an executive order that resulted in its removal from the BSAT list?

It could be because SARS isn’t that dangerous despite it being highly infectious and where mortality coincides with an average of 4.0 comorbidities [flu/pneumo, heart disease, diabetes and obesity], which is true, but that conflicts with the Criminal Enterprise’s entire pandemic narrative and must be summarily dismissed as the explanation.

Occam’s Razor informs us that it’s likely because SARS is deadly in ways both known and not yet fully known, which is also true, as much as SARS was already the preferred bio-WMD circa 2005 and that the Criminal Enterprise had been conducting work with hostile foreign nations to develop it for years.

The high transmission rate of SARS [SARS-CoV-2] combined with the misapplication of PCR tests that are calibrated with deliberately and faulty high cycle thresholds combine to produce the very specific net effect of false positive test results in abundance.

Along with the NVSS memos, this permits the Criminal Enterprise to effectively drive a fraudulent pandemic of harvested and constructed data that is derived from a co-morbidity reservoir mostly of flu and pneumonia.

Evidencing this is that fraudulent sole cause COVID mortality were later found to include an average of 2.6 [2020] and 4.0 [2021] underlying co-morbidities.

Occam’s again informs us that Obama had SARS removed from the BSAT list to veil longstanding plans and work to leverage it as a highly effective bio-WMD and the basis for the fraudulent construct and the status quo.

As defined by U.S. patent law and in support of the above contention, SARS [SARS-CoV-2] is a man-made or bioweaponized pathogen and not a naturally occurring one. That detail is what makes SARS-CoV-2 patentable and it’s why it had 73 existing patents on it before the pandemic broke-out in 2019.

SARS-CoV-2 also has 6 artificial HIV inserts that are genetic markers indicative of gain of function development. These are also evidenced in the patent filings; not to mention Fauci’s work on using coronavirus as a potential vaccine vector for HIV.

More recently and according to a 30 Jul 21 paper detailing vaccine breakthrough infections in mass gatherings, there was a cohort of 6% vaccinated people in this study who subsequent to their COVID vaccine tested positive for HIV. This bears down hard on the 6 artificial HIV inserts and the gain of function work in the SARS-CoV-2 virus; including the Fauci HIV work, bio-WMD applications and depopulation considerations.

All considered, SARS qualifies fully and in every way for the list from which Obama specifically and unilaterally removed it as caused by executive order.

The work detailing Obama’s handling of SARS bears down again on the 2017 timeline.

In 2012 into 2013, the MERS outbreak occurred and both SARS and MERS are coronaviruses. This makes the 2012-2013 MERS outbreak important to our timeline.

Evidence shows that in its composition, SARS-CoV-2 has elements of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS; along with the 6 artificial HIV inserts.

Here’s what the CDC tells us about MERS,

“Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is an illness caused by a virus (more specifically, a coronavirus) called Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Most MERS patients developed severe respiratory illness with symptoms of fever, cough and shortness of breath. About 3 or 4 out of every 10 patients reported with MERS have died.

Health officials first reported the disease in Saudi Arabia in September 2012. Through retrospective (backward-looking) investigations, they later identified that the first known cases of MERS occurred in Jordan in April 2012. So far, all cases of MERS have been linked through travel to, or residence in, countries in and near the Arabian Peninsula. The largest known outbreak of MERS outside the Arabian Peninsula occurred in the Republic of Korea in 2015. The outbreak was associated with a traveler returning from the Arabian Peninsula.”

Dr. Martin of MCAM ties the 2012-2013 MERS outbreak to a 2015 U.S. patent 9193780 that came out after the U.S. gain of function moratorium beginning in 2014. It was internal federal whistleblowers in 2014 and the subsequent GOF moratorium that created the impetus to off-shore U.S. GOF work to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.

Another critical 2012-2013 element bearing down on the 2017 timeline occurred in 2013. In October 2013 then Vice President Joe Biden leveraged the power, influence and access afforded to him by the Office of the Vice President to fly Hunter Biden to China aboard Air Force II.

The elder Biden provided Hunter access to Ye Jianming, the Chairman of the CEFC, a now defunct Chinese Energy Company that constituted the financial arm of the One Belt, One Road, as noted earlier.

The political arm of One Belt, One Road is the Communist Chinese Party and the People’s Liberation Army is obviously omnipresent.

While there, Hunter closed a $1.5 billion deal in private equity with chairman Ye. The deal included Hunter Biden entering into agreement to serve as attorney to Ye. Although Biden graduated from Yale Law School in 1996, he has no energy qualifications whatsoever and that envelops the Biden/Burisma/Ukraine concerns not addressed here but which speak to the position of using the energy as the conduit to move money.

Importantly, the deal with Ye and the CEFC positioned the Bidens to begin profiting in 2017. This is accounted for with Biden’s position as then vice president and him being precluded from entering into any such agreements. So it was necessary to schedule the profits to begin in 2017 and once Biden was out of office.

Biden’s actions above are a clear abuse of power that exceed corrupt and criminal and encroach directly on treason as per the legal definition.

In 2016, Biden’s income was $396,456. Then, from 2017-2019, it exploded exponentially to $16,596,979. This is a direct overlay with the scheduled beginning of the CEFC profits scheduled to begin in 2017. The genesis for that deal was the vice presidency of the United States as occupied by Biden. It all applies to the 2017 timeline that follows.

Notably, ongoing work on a forensic copy of the Hunter Biden hard drive is just beginning by Garrett Zeigler, a former Trump White House Official under Peter Navarro. Those findings should be used to further inform this work and with the understanding that the hard drive also contains a full slate of compromising evidence on Vice President Kamala Harris.

What follows is another peculiar aspect of the 2012-2013 period that will come to bear on the 2017 timeline.

From 2012-2016, now Director of the WHO Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was the Minister of Foreign Affairs for Ethiopia. Ethiopia has a long and complicated history with communist Marxism dating back to 1974.

This puts Tedros on the same playing field with former Secretary of State John Kerry from 2013-2017; Kerry having replaced Hillary Clinton.
Tedros reemerges in 2017.

Moving into 2014-2015, internal federal whistleblowers emerged calling into question prohibited gain of function work in U.S. biosecurity facilities. It resulted in then Department of Homeland Secretary Lisa Monaco co-issuing a memorandum that ordered a biosecurity “stand down” at all U.S. biocontainment facilities.

An Obama White House article entitled ‘Doing Diligence to Asses the Risks and Benefits of Life Sciences Gain-of-Function Research’ is but one of many items making this evident in 2014. Further evidence can also be found in a number of reports surfacing in 2009.

Monaco’s 2015 memo is positioned as the mechanism to envelop the compromised gain of function work so it could be extracted and exported to China and specifically to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The memo was signed 29 Oct 15. It was also in 2015 that Obama made an exception to U.S. policy and permitted U.S. funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China in the amount $3.7 million.

In 2015, Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, which became the Fauci funding partner to funnel U.S. funds to the WIV, made a curious statement that was reported on 12 Feb 16. In it he said this,

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pancoronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

Later in 2016, Daszak said this while describing how his organization collaborated with China in researching gene sequences of deadly viruses by “insert[ing] spike proteins” into viruses to see if they can “bind to human cells,”

“Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we… Well I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people. You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.”

2016 also presents as a benchmark year in the sense that through gain of function work, the U.S. had engineered and patented all of the elements necessary to position the SARS coronavirus for human emergence and commercial exploitation. This is evidenced in Ralph Baric’s paper at the University of North Carolina and he will come to bear again in 2017-2018.

In 2016-2017, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations [CEPI] was borne out of Davos and The World Economic Forum as founded and funded by the Gates Foundation [$100mm], The Wellcome Trust [$100mm] and a slate of nations including Japan [$125mm], Germany [$110mm], Norway [$200mm], Australia [$1.5mm], Belgium [$.6mm] and Canada [$3mm].

The concept for CEPI was first proposed in January 2016 and later an interim board was established before it appointed its CEO on 11 Jul 16 at the first board meeting.

George Soros is an agenda provider to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum and Soros’ entanglements are deep, wide and complex like Gates’.

Now located in Oslo, Norway and according to it’s mission statement as found in its very first financial report for 2016-2017,

“CEPI’s mission is to stimulate, finance and co-ordinate vaccine development against diseases with epidemic potential where market incentives fail and to ensure equitable access to those vaccines for populations in need. CEPI is filling a critical gap in vaccine ecosystem.”

CEPI has these additional mission priorities: expediting vaccine candidates through the late preclinical studies before epidemics begin, establish investigational stockpiles ready for use, funding the development of new platform technologies and rapid vaccine deployment against unknown pathogens, funding and coordinating collective global epidemic response involving vaccine stockpiling and procurement.

CEPI uses its convening power to bring together actors in the various fields of vaccines to promote the development of epidemic vaccines even where CEPI is not a direct funder.

From CEPI’s 2019 report,

“The fourth call for proposals was launched in October 2019, for the development of innovative platform technologies that can be used to develop vaccines and other immunoprophylactic to rapidly respond to future outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases and “Disease X”. This call was to build on and strengthen the first call for rapid response platforms. The fifth call for proposals was issued on February 3, 2020 in response to the COVID-19 epidemic and is focused on the development of vaccines against this disease, with an emphasis on speed, scale, and access.”

The CEPI date of October 2019 and CEPI’s stated mission and objectives relative to that date will reemerge with Harvard University professor Charles Lieber, the FBI and President Trump’s Department of Defense.

CEPI officially launched January 2017 from Davos and we consider it a direct Globalist interface to global governments and health institutions worldwide; and it is critical to both the important 2017 timeline and the fraudulent COVID construct altogether.

Recall Obama’s exclusion of SARS from the BSAT list above.

On 18 Mar 16 and by edict, Obama issued Public Law 114-136. This executive order augmented longstanding presidential transition law drawing back to the Kennedy assassination in 1963; and noting that tie back to GHWB.

Presidential transition law underpins the presidential transition process and it includes an entire office dedicated to it. Both the outgoing and incoming administrations are compelled to participate in this transition hand-off of the Office of the President of the United States.

What follows is fundamental to everything. In Public Law 114-136, Obama changed the standing presidential transition law by augmenting it to include a pandemic preparedness component.

The executive order will permit Obama to insert the COVID-19 pandemic construct into the incoming Trump administration during presidential transition meetings on the 2017 timeline. There it would rest in lie-in-wait mode until the end of 2019.

The declaration of a pandemic followed by the declaration of a national emergency triggered the inserted pandemic to bend back on President Trump and setting him up to be removed with the 25th Amendment.

The Criminal Enterprise then followed a specific path of issuing pro-China edicts, guidelines and mitigations that defied existing science, research, medical practices, established conventions, common sense and conventional approaches.

Since the President was compelled by law out of presidential competence to defer to the Criminal Enterprise, they were placed on course to drive the nation into the ground in all ways: economically, socially, culturally, politically, psychologically, criminally, unconstitutionally and otherwise.

Had the President pushed back against the Criminal Enterprise, he was already positioned to be removed with the 25th Amendment, its existing pretext and as leveraged by presidential competence.

The pretext for the 25th was everywhere but it was derailed by Operation Warp Speed and access to vaccines, which was a line the Criminal Enterprise itself drew and Trump unexpectedly crossed. The result of that required the Criminal Enterprise to shift its plan and timeline causing the latter to become increasingly expedited in the mode of catch-up and re-calibration.

Considering this 2017 presidential transition timeline, it should be noted that the Presidential Transition Office facilitating these compulsory meetings and it is a functionary of the same Department of Homeland Security from which Lisa Monaco co-issued her U.S. biosecurity stand-down memo on 29 Oct 15. Again, we note the closed-loop concepts and compartmentalization considerations as indicators of fraud.

It should be further noted that DHS was borne out of the 9/11 aftermath becoming operational 11 days after those events. That timeline directly overlays the emergence of the U.S. biosecurity revamp timeline with the Anthrax scare. All of this threads directly back to George H.W. Bush via George W. Bush.

Moving further through 2016 and into the most important 2017, on 28 Jul 16 and according to declassified documents that were specifically notes from CIA Director John Brennan, Obama had knowledge of and then subsequently approved of the Clinton campaign’s plan to target the Trump campaign with fraudulent Russian collusion allegations.

This is part of the genesis of the now patently fraudulent “Russian collusion” attack vector and the Obamagate/FISA angles that emerged from it. This also draws back to and comports exactly with the importance of the Criminal Enterprise’s vectoring in on Flynn as its first and highest priority target.

The 2017 Timeline

In 2017, the Clinton/Obama/Brennan Russian collusion angle directly overlapped the incoming Trump NSA Director Lt. General Michael Flynn at the precise same time it intersected the presidential transition meetings between the outgoing Obama administration and the incoming Trump administration.

Notably, as the incoming NSA Director, Flynn was a scheduled participant for those meetings.

The transition meetings draw back to Obama’s 18 Mar 16 issuance of Public Law 114-136 that specifically permitted the insertion of a viral pandemic construct into Trump’s administration by adding it to the transition agenda. We evidence this with the actual presentation slides.

Further backdrop to 2017 includes George Soros liquidating $18 billion of personal wealth and sending it to his broad network of non-governmental entities [NGOs.] These NGOS are a primary interface for the private-public relationship that is redundantly exploited throughout the entire fraudulent construct and government altogether.

NGOs account for how government funds [taxpayer money] can be diverted to fund entities like Antifa, BLM, etc. This is especially so during an election year.

NGOs account for a reliable method of funneling money and making inroads all over the globe by plugging into governmental entities.

In January of 2017 and in ways conflicting with his decision to emphasize pandemic preparedness during presidential transition, Obama made two curious decisions during his last days in office.

Therein, Obama increased funding to the Gates and China controlled WHO by $171 million at the same time he sought funding cuts at his own CDC, which is effectively owned by Gates through funding.

Moreover, back in 2015, there was a $414 million cut to the CDC year over year and in 2017, the cuts Obama sought amounted to $251 million.

On 05 Jan 17, Obama would hold a meeting that extended to Susan Rice and Joe Biden and noting that James Comey and Sally Yates were participants. In the meeting, Obama ordered that the fraudulently constructed Russian collusion investigation into the incoming Trump administration be “by the book.”

This draws back to Obama’s first knowledge of this on 28 Jul 16 as we outlined above and is a clear indicator of means, motive and opportunity.

This constitutes the Clinton campaign being directly injected into the Trump administration by and as enforced by the Obama administration.

Respective to that meeting and relative to the broader 2017 timeline, it bears repeating that in 2016, Biden’s income was $396,456 and from 2017-2019 it was $16,596,979.

On 10 Jan 17, five days after the 05 Jan 17 by the book meeting, Buzzfeed published the fraudulent Steele Dossier, which ties back to our note that John Brennan previously included it in Obama’s PDB to give the bad intelligence instant but false veracity and reliability. Again, this is a GHWB created capability.

The next day on 11 Jan 17 at a public forum on pandemic preparedness, Anthony Fauci said at Georgetown University that the Trump administration would face a “surprise disease outbreak.”

The following day on 12 Jan 17 and noting that “Russian collusion” was the basis for obtaining the government’s most sensitive FISA warrants to spy on the Trump umbrella, the Carter Page FISA warrant was set to expire and required renewal.

Also on the 12th, the FBI verified that the sub-source for the fraudulent Steele Dossier, which had already been leaked publicly two days earlier, was compromised and unreliable meaning that the dossier was baseless and fraudulent Russian disinformation.

On 13 Jan 17, the most important day on the timeline, two things happened. Earlier on, the Obama White House and the MSM coordinated the leak of the Flynn/Russia narrative as drawing back into the late hours of the previous day.

The timing to leak patently fraudulent information in the MSM evidences that it was devised as a deflection point mechanism to detract from the transition meetings and to distract its participants away from the coming pandemic insert.

Later on 13 Jan 17 and during the presidential transition meetings that included the incoming NSA Director Flynn, the Obama administration inserted the pandemic construct into the Trump administration. It was scheduled into the transition meetings and then delivered accordingly as permitted by Obama’s Executive Order Public Law 114-136 as signed on 18 Mar 16.

More specifically, the EO permitted Obama to insert the exposure, liability and culpability for the pandemic that would be incurred by President Trump. This can be definitively defined as a contextual insertion of pretext that permits the Criminal Enterprise to circle back to it following the outbreak. In common terms, it’s a “set-up.”

Days later on 24 Jan 17, the FBI would drop-in to interview Lt. General Michael Flynn about the Russian allegations.

This would be the genesis and the momentum to move towards impeaching President Trump. Evidence shows the fraudulent nature of the impeachment by its requirement to shift from “Russian collusion” allegations to charges of a Trump diplomatic call with Ukraine alleged to be outside of the lines. Unexpected by the Criminal Enterprise, Trump released the call transcript to demonstrate the fraud.
Tedros reemerges.

In 2017, the WHO changed the procedure for its succession process for the first time since 1947. This became the obvious insertion point for China to install a fellow communist into the directorship of the WHO that it and Gates already owned.

The vote procedure was changed to a secret electronic vote that did not permit the nations to see how any other nation voted. Drawing back to his coalescence with Kerry and Clinton, Tedros became the first bureaucrat and non-physician to lead the WHO and his tenure began on 01 Jul 17.

In June 2017 and just before Tedros began his tenure at the WHO, the World Bank announced the creation of “specialized bonds” that would be used to fund the previously created Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF) in the event of an officially-recognized pandemic as determined by the WHO.

The bonds were sold under the premise that losses would be incurred if any of six deadly pandemics hit, including coronavirus. If a pandemic did not occur before the bonds mature on July 15, 2020, investors would receive back what they had originally paid for the bonds in addition to interest and premium payments on those bonds received between the purchase and maturation dates.

The World Bank concept was “to channel surge funding to developing countries facing the risk of a pandemic” and the creation of these so-called “pandemic bonds” was intended to transfer pandemic risk in low-income countries to global financial markets.

In a World Bank press release covering the launch of the bonds, the WHO backed the World Bank’s initiative.

Also occurring in 2017, 2018 and 2019 and according to spreadsheets sourced from an epidemiologist, World Integrated Trade System records indicate the purchase of “COVID-19 Test Kits” in those years and by a list of nations to include the European Union, U.S., Germany, China, France, Netherlands, Italy, U.K., Canada, Spain, Belgium, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland and others.

The 2017-2019 WITS records dates are critically important because they were curated years in advance of the term “COVID-19,” which never existed until the outbreak was given the name “COVID-19” on 11 Feb 20. This is abundantly fraudulent.

As 2017 turned into 2018, a peculiar occurrence happened involving Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina. Baric had been involved in the research and development of a recombinant lung-targeting coronavirus. The patented ownership of it was mysteriously transferred from Baric’s UNC to the NIH in 2018.

The transfer is problematic because the Bayh Dole Act provides the U.S. government a ‘march in right provision.’ This means that the U.S.-funded research entitles the NIH to benefit from that research at its demand and regardless of ownership. This means the transfer was completely unnecessary and so then, why in 2017 into 2018 did the NIH suddenly have to take ownership of the patent to which it already had rights?

In March of 2019 and before the pandemic outbreak, Moderna was made aware that relative to the development of the COVID vaccine for a pandemic yet to start or be named “COVID”, it would be queued up to the front of the line.

In that same month, a series of four failed patent applications for SARS vaccines were amended to include the language of a “deliberate release” of coronavirus. Once the curious amendments were made, the filings received approval.

Also in 2019, the federal government posted a job listing at USAJOBS for “Public Health Advisor [Quarantine Program]” positions with a date range of 15 Nov 19 through 05 May 20. 15 Nov 19 predates the outbreak by over two months and even predates the revised outbreak date of 17 Nov 19.

In the month before this on 18 Oct 19, Johns Hopkins, The Gates Foundation and The World Economic Forum held “Event 201,” which functioned as a dry run or pre-game warm-up to iron-out bugs in the broader system in advance of the coming pandemic event.

The World Economic Forum also ties us back to CEPI from above and this is where CEPI and its mission and objectives bear down relative to professor Lieber, the FBI and Trump’s DOD.

Specifically, we’re recalling the October 2019 range when CEPI began the development of innovative platform technologies for vaccines to rapidly respond to future outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases and “Disease X”.

In November 2019, Chinese nationals who were Harvard University students and CCP officers got caught conspiring with Harvard Professor Charles Lieber to smuggle coronavirus samples to China. This occurred on 3 different occasions in 2019 and at two international airports – Detroit and Boston. These occurred on the short run-up to the outbreak of the pandemic.

Lieber’s NIH entanglements include receiving federal funding and they draw back to 2008. His Chinese entanglements go back to 2011 where he participated in the Chinese recruitment program Thousand Talents from 2012-2017, which has its origins in Chinese doctrine and One Belt, One Road.

Considering both CEPI’s and Lieber’s entanglements, we draw back a bit to the time period of October 2019 and through to the first outbreak of the disease.

It was in October 2019 that the FBI first gained knowledge of the viral outbreak in China. This is according to the FBI’s own Tactical Intelligence Report of 13 Nov 19.

The FBI has a self-imposed mandate to report any national security concerns to then President Trump’s Department of Defense, which it did not do. This occurred despite the FBI’s assignment of a bio-WMD classification and its own WMDD directorate, which was bearing down.

More importantly, these details mean that the intelligence community was at the core of criminality and treason as evidenced by the FISA marker attached to one of the ancillary intelligence reports attaching to the 13 Nov 19 FBI report. This could be a likely mechanism to supersede other agencies and vacuum up evidence to compartmentalize away.

This is all problematic for the members of the HPSCI and the SSCI – the intelligence committees – because they were privy to the October 2019 intelligence about the outbreak in China. That includes all of the members of those committees and the ex officio members that were House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell.

Knowing of the October 2019 outbreak, Pelosi was dedicated solely to driving a fraudulent impeachment construct by repeatedly saying that they had to impeach Trump before Christmas. She did this without ever mentioning the October 2019 outbreak.

On 25 Oct 19, Joe Biden then made this curious statement that is absolutely considered as deliberate pretext akin to Fauci’s at Georgetown in 2017,

“We are not prepared for a pandemic. Trump has rolled back progress President Obama and I made to strengthen global health security. We need leadership that builds public trust, focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores.”

Do the funding cuts to the CDC year over year constitute “progress?”

Moving towards Christmas and remembering Pelosi’s redundant calls to impeach before then for a “crime” she couldn’t prove in a case that she couldn’t make, on 13 Dec 19, impeachment was authorized by Jerry Nadler’s Judiciary Committee.

On 27 Dec 19 and just two days after Christmas, the pandemic outbreak was first announced in a news broadcast. The investigator observed it in real time, took exception to it and informally opened the investigation due to it’s ties to China, the potential of a viral construct and the curious timing as occurring curiously situated after Christmas and before New years while the majority of the Western world was recovering from one major holiday and preparing for another.

On 31 Dec 19, China notified the WHO of its discovery of the pathogen being a coronavirus and eventually SARS-CoV-2.

After the outbreak, Pelosi paraded around Chinatown in San Francisco excoriating the President as a xenophobe and inviting people to visit.

Similar occurrences occurred elsewhere like in New York as legacy media was bent back against President Trump by the Criminal Enterprise for any conventional or effective mitigations he proposed, like restricting Chinese travel.

The President’s common sense mitigation efforts were branded racist and xenophobic. There is no evidence anywhere tying viral transmission to racist or xenophobic considerations and obviously so.

2020 concluded with a single data point that proved problematic to everything and it spiraled into a series of other problems and solutions that once understood clearly evidence the pandemic being entirely fraudulent.

The single data point is this – by the CDC’s own data, 2020 was only the 12th deadliest year in the past 12 years thus statistically precluding any possibility for a pandemic of mortality data to exist outside of a fraudulent data construct.

One Criminal Enterprise solution to circumvent this was to simply move the measurement away from mortality data. Another solution was to simply revise away any data sets that remained problematic to the narrative.

After authorizing impeachment and drafting the articles, in seemingly unexplained fashion Pelosi stalled and refused to transmit the articles to the Senate for the President’s trial until 16 Jan 20, when they were formally transmitted.

Exclusively and proprietarily, our work positions Pelosi’s curious and grossly mismanaged impeachment as a deflection point construct away from the ushering-in of the fraudulent COVID pandemic; the outbreak for which she knew about in October 2019.

Four days later on 20 Jan 20 and after the Senate formally received the articles from the House, the first U.S. case of “coronavirus” was reported at Providence Regional Medical Center in Everett, Washington. On the same day, Fauci announced that vaccines were being developed for a virus that was not yet isolated and in contradiction to U.S. patent filings evidencing the preexistence of mRNA vaccines.

The next day on the 21st of January, the Senate voted on the rules for the President’s impeachment trial while Anthony Fauci advised the nation to stand-down to the coronavirus stating that it was “not a threat.”

The day after Fauci’s stand-down, the President’s impeachment trial commenced with the House impeachment manager’s [prosecution] opening arguments.

The trial progressed up through President Trump’s issuance of travel restrictions for China on 31 Jan 20.

On 05 Feb 20, President Trump was acquitted; however, COVID was firmly established in place and with the first bulk COVID infection and mortality data inbound.

Six days later, the coronavirus outbreak would be named “COVID-19” on 11 Feb 20. Here, we recall that this is same “COVID-19” under which test kits were ordered in 2017, 2018 and 2019 when “COVID-19” didn’t yet exist.

Around mid-February, the first bulk sets arrived for COVID infection and mortality data. The work confirming the component to harvest co-morbidity data [flu/pneumo, diabetes, heart disease and obesity] and propagate it as COVID galvanized the investigative vectors and confirmed important early thoughts and positions.

On 11 Mar 20, the declaration of a national emergency occurs causing the Criminal Enterprise to functionally usurp President Trump’s emergency executive authority by drawing him into conflict with a legal mechanism found in the Stafford Act – “presidential competence.”

The entire fraudulent construct is built around this single identifiable mechanism that functioned to disqualify the President from making important executive decisions under his Title II Executive authority.

The usurping Criminal Enterprise included what would eventually become the Task Force that Trump appointed, which included Vice President Mike Pence. The Task Force is the Criminal Enterprise under RICO.

In mid-April 2020, President Trump absorbed all of that momentum and then pushed it back upstream to compartmentalize it with the Task Force when he dispatched Fauci back to the podium in a press conference requiring him to correct the record from a previous statement.

This effectively required Fauci et al to take sole ownership of any and all issued COVID mitigations or guidelines as permitted by the usurpation of Executive emergency authority.

Therein, Trump compartmentalized all of the culpability for COVID with the Criminal Enterprise and this helps qualify the Criminal Enterprise for prosecution under RICO.

On 19 Mar 20 the lock-downs were ordered by the Criminal Enterprise and issued with the Trump administration’s recommendations to governors. On 31 Mar, Trump called for a 30-day window to “flatten the curve.”

On 02 Apr, Fauci called for national lock-downs, which were extended to 30 Apr.

This mid-April 2020 period is critical to the construct because at this moment the Criminal Enterprise faced a decline in the benchmark measurement for pandemics – mortality data.

Since the COVID data was being harvested primarily from a flu/pnuemo reservoir, it was subject to the seasonal die-off period in the spring and summer until those pathogens reemerge for the next peak flu/COVID season. This accounts for the mid-April decline in mortality.

The Criminal Enterprise solved the seasonal die-off problem by moving the benchmark measurement away from declining mortality data and instead, it began reporting “new cases.” This has never been done before in the history of epidemics/pandemics. This is abundantly fraudulent.

Here, our introductory explanation of how the construct works is important.

With “new cases” established, the Criminal Enterprise was permitted to run the full pandemic system by using it’s two data drivers, the NVSS memos and PCR/CT testing. Also plugging into that is the variant to serve as the seasonal die-off bridge to spanning to the next peak flu/COVID season.

According to Kary Mullis, the developer of the PCR test who died months before the outbreak on 07 Aug 19, the PCR test was never intended as a diagnostic instrument and so its use in COVID is therefore a misapplication of the instrument.

Moreover, the Criminal Enterprise set the cycle thresholds for PCR testing in the anomalously high range of approximately 35-45 and where the conventional range is approximately 17-25.

Using high cycle thresholds in PCR testing has a specific net-effect in that it produces false positive test results in abundance. This accounts for the Criminal Enterprise’s ability to manufacture “new cases” by using fraudulently designed diagnostic instruments. This is fraud.

To demonstrate this as fraud, written projections on 30 Nov 20 indicated that the Criminal Enterprise was beginning the pivot back out of COVID to add benefit to the newly elected Biden administration.

On 20 Jan 21 and before the first hour of the newly inaugurated Biden administration had expired, the Criminal Enterprise [WHO/Tedros] lowered the cycle thresholds for PCR testing back down to a conventional range.

Statistical and empirical confirmation of this precise 30 Nov 20 political projection was received in March 2021 after COVID had plummeted following its January 2021 peak and the revision of PCR cycle thresholds.

This all evidences the exact nature the faulty-by-design PCR test/cycle threshold dynamic as a generator fraudulent COVID data in abundance and for propagation. It also evidences its bridge function during the seasonal die-off period.

On 28 Aug 20 and before the CDC bridged us over to peak flu 2020-2021, it made the the first of two bulk data set revisions noted previously as it relates to 2020 being only the 12th deadliest year.

The revisions rendered 94% of their sole cause COVID mortality data as unreliable leaving only 6% of it as reliable. Further, sole cause mortality was found to have an average of 2.6 underlying co-morbidities. When controlling for the 94%, the 2020 flu season reverts back to a conventional and statistically unremarkable flu season.

On 12 May 21, the CDC made the same revision to continue handling the problematic data point. The revisions caused only 5% of their sole cause COVID mortality data to be valid, 95% of it invalid and with an average of 4.0 underlying co-morbidities [flu/pneumo, heart disease, diabetes and obesity.]

Those are two of the most egregious fraudulent data points in U.S. history.

As it relates to the present, we’re in the heart of the seasonal die-off period for the harvested co-morbidities being propagated as COVID-19. This directly relates to the confirmed predicted position noted above.

Therein, the “variant” was positioned to serve as the mechanism to drag the pandemic through the seasonal die-off period for 2020-2021 in the same way moving the benchmark measurement achieved this in spring 2020.

In the Delta, Lamda, Mu and other variants, we have a predicted and empirically confirmed position for the identified and required bridge to circumvent the seasonal die-off period and bridge the pandemic to successive peak flu seasons and their co-morbidity data reservoirs.

Once peak flu 2021-2022 arrives for third consecutive and identifiable “COVID season,” the COVID script will repeat.

Evidence suggests that at a minimum, this will include mandatory vaccines, annual boosters, new vaccines within 95 days of every emerged variant outbreak, lockdowns and other fraudulent, unconstitutional, criminal and treasonous acts as defined by the U.S. Constitution, U.S. law and specifically RICO statute.

With 40,000 SARS-CoV-2 variants already included in U.S. patent filings and assuming a new variant were introduced every day instead of every annual seasonal die-off period, there is a sufficient amount of variants to run the fraudulent pandemic construct for another 110 years.

Unless the people rise up and stand alongside legitimate authority and leadership that has the gumption and wherewithal to directly engage the Criminal Enterprise, Americans will be challenged to flatten the curve forever.

The End and Goodbye

This is the end of the road for now and so goodbyes are in order. The investigator has lived his life by this work and out of refusal to wear a mask that will never work or accept a vaccine mandate that is unconstitutional, he is being terminated and loses his position, salary, benefits, career, retirement, life savings and home. This will require a shift in gears that requires relocation to another state as unemployed. Therefore, this is the last article.



*Still requires final proofreading, editing and revisions.


COVID Data: Cleaved, Compartmentalized, Controlled, Compromised, Criminal and Cunning

The CDC, which deservedly ought to be rebranded as the Cons for Disease Criminality, advises that the bulk data sets driving the metrics and decision making processes for the entire country respective to the COVID pandemic are derived from a cohort of only 37 hospitals that have been cleaved away from the 608 hospitals that comprise the standard NHCS survey pool, which typically informs the CDC on disease outbreaks. We spent quite a bit of time on this in the last article – The Obamacare Bedrock of the Fraudulent COVID Pandemic – and we’ll rely on some of that work here because this information is so significant that it deserves its own space.

Getting to brass tacks, here’s what the CDC advises relative to the curation of COVID data. In the first paragraph the broader cohort of 608 hospitals in the NHCS survey pool is cited but in the second, we note how 37 hospitals are cleaved away from the broader cohort of 608 and impacting data metrics substantially.

This leads to many important questions through the lens of fraud like which hospitals are they? Do they exist in particular geographic areas respective to Democratic control, major urban hub populations, federal funding and discretionary funding in the form of grants, etc.? Are they representative of the nation as a whole? Do they include rural hospitals outside of urban areas relative to virology and epidemiology?

More importantly, I’m going on several days of trying to identify the exact list of 37 hospitals ergo why is it so layered, obfuscated and difficult to find? Why isn’t there an embedded and convenient link to identify these 37 hospitals? What is being hidden?

Read this carefully for the discussion that follows.

In the first indicated paragraph above, we note these specific points respective to the data and the larger cohort of 608 hospitals that informs it. For one, the data captured is “electronic,” just like the voting data of the 2020 election and that makes it vulnerable to third party compromise. See the 2020 election. My broader concerns don’t necessarily lie there; however, that concern is a legitimate one.

For another, we note that the NHCS survey metrics include “all encounters in a calendar year from a nationally representative sample” of 608 hospitals. Through logical deduction and on its face, this is conventional and acceptable. Therein and importantly, the CDC is being informed by metrics that include ALL ENCOUNTERS that occur within a CALENDAR YEAR and this provides adequate baseline data against which to measure for any potential outbreaks or associated events. MOST IMPORTANTLY, the data sampling is “NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE.”

As we discussed in the last article and as evidenced above,

But then a clear, obvious and conflicting distinction is drawn whereby the distinct difference applies to NHCS data providers specifically for COVID data sets, which are only received from 37 hospitals spread throughout the country and just as we noted above. What makes this extract different is the inclusion of the NHCS Urban-Rural Classification System for Counties and we’re latching onto that to deliver the list of 37 that we intend to prove with the funding data points; especially discretionary funding.

The obvious and clear distinction relative to COVID v. other outbreaks is how the CDC diverges from the standard system of NHCS informative data practices [608 hospital survey pool] to cleave away a decidedly smaller survey data pool of 37 NHCS. This equates to a 94% change in the sample size and stands to affect the data output on COVID substantially.

Note how the data are positioned to be “preliminary, and the results may change with subsequent releases.” This bears down directly on previous work and right down to the exact same percentage – 94% – and not that we can make a direct correlation to it, but still. We find it in the two bulk data revisions on 26 Aug 20 and 12 May 21 that I’ve covered extensively.

For fulsome understanding here, we have to examine another CDC publication regarding the selected COVID hospitals and conveniently, this data point is omitted from the previous one meaning it won’t be found unless it’s sought out. It pertains to the concept of using a nationally representative data pool to drive the metrics.

First, we note how the “information is not available in other hospital reporting systems.” Why? Why is there a deliberate action to cleave away COVID data [its sources and systems] from the broader cohort?

We further draw down on the fact that, “The 2020 and 2021 NHCS are not yet fully operational.” Not fully operational? This means that the COVID data curation system equates to a car that doesn’t have all of it’s parts. Try driving that car anywhere safely, appropriately or effectively and then try driving it across the entire nation. This is evidenced fraud for my nickel.

Let me summarize all of this: Fauci and the CDC diverged away from the standard and nationally representative pool of 608 hospitals that normally informs their decision-making processes electing instead to use an incomplete system that is not nationally representative and only includes 37 hospitals the list for which we can not locate or identify.

Who has a problem with that? It’s a rhetorical question for us and not even an issue for the mask-wearing, vaccine-getting, Kool-Aid drinking sub-population of those incapable of independent and critical thinking and who insist on virtuously leading the rest of us to enslavement.

Here’s how I put it in the last article,

We talk about compartmentalizing culpability a lot and that’s what this is as I’ve been evidencing in the broader scope for a long time. Empirically and as it relates to the construct, identifying the 37-point list may allow us to draw-down with precision on identifiable components within this closed loop system by vetting it against the top federal funds recipients.

Why did they cleave the COVID data source away from the regular cohort of 608 hospitals? Easier to control. Easier to guarantee. Easier all the way around. Easier to compartmentalize culpability.

How many of those hospitals are located in areas where riots, COVID mitigation enforcement and election fraud were prominent issues and there is a heavy and powerful Democratic presence if not full control or a Republican presence known to be as compromised and corrupt as their Democratic counterparts?

Why can’t I find the list of those 37 hospitals?

It gets worse.

In my attempt to identify our NHCS list of 37 hospitals, we had to latch-on to the NCHS [different than the NHCS] urban-rural classification system for counties. This work equated to parsing-out an 81-page document to generate a list of urban hub populations comprised of sub-grouped counties to then cross-reference it against substantial discretionary funding [federal grant dollars] as per the CDC’s Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Prevention and Control of Emerging Infectious Diseases (ELC).

In other words, we parsed-out 81 pages to formulate a list that should contain the 37 hospitals and then we drew down on that list to eliminate those outside of the 37 by running down the discretionary funding. That equates to paying the entities you want, where you want, for the reasons you want when you want. It’s fraud.

That work gave us a good idea, but not an exact one providing the precise list of 37 hospitals [see the article linked up top.]

Although the 37 NHCS hospitals are most important here because they tie directly to funding and discretionary funding, what’s more important about them are their geographic locations and for the critical reason I pointed out in the Obamacare piece,

Note these locations from the ELC relative to the map overlay graphic above: Colorado, Georgia, Florida, New York City, Los Angeles County, New York, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Illinois, Arizona, North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Houston, Philadelphia, Delaware, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, D.C., and Chicago. ALL OF THESE LOCATIONS are entangled in all of the work at Moonshine and in ways that all draw down on Orange Man Bad, fake pandemics and stolen elections. They all got discretionary federal money and it’s all of the usual suspects.

From the same,

The buried gold in this is understanding the source of the data for the data driver as fuel for the construct and then finding how the source is strung, funded and controlled. After issuing the NVSS diagnostic memos to steer COVID infection and mortality data to desired and fraudulent ends, the criminal enterprise appears positioned to cherry-pick data from the 37 hospitals they selected as COVID data providers. That data set drives the fraudulent construct and frames determinations of policy for the nation as a whole. Is the entire nation being dominated by 37 major urban areas and are Democratic leaders firmly in control of them?

Everything I’ve outlined here IS ENTIRELY DEMONSTRABLE OF FRAUD AS COMMITTED BY A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE and as prosecutable under RICO statute. Period.

The COVID data sets have been cleaved away from the standard 608-hospital cohort and compartmentalized into one consisting of 37 hospitals. This occurs within the already established fraudulent construct of redundant control systems that permit the pulling of levers [manipulation of data and the subsequent decisions] whenever, wherever, however and why the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE dictates.

This permits the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE the capacity to control, insulate and establish a firewall for the data curation process relative to the medical provider community writ large [think about how internal whistleblowers could be disruptive to it.] Comprehensively, the constructive elements here manifest as a cunning strategy to destroy the nation with compromised data the metrics for which the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE determined and then mandated for all medical providers and for the express purpose of executing a pandemic entirely of fraudulent data.

My bet is that we already know the 37 areas by a different context. My bet is that’s why they’re so damned difficult to find and identify. My bet is that these locations will overlap in myriad ways: COVID mitigations, rioting, burning, looting, election fraud, general funding, discretionary funding, etc. You know the list.

I’ve been saying SINCE EARLY FEBRUARY OF 2020 THAT THE ENTIRE PANDEMIC IS ONE OF FRAUDULENTLY PROPAGATED DATA. Someone – ANYONE – prove me wrong and provide the evidence. Good luck.


The Obamacare Bedrock of the Fraudulent COVID Pandemic

Two recent articles were comprehensive capstone pieces on a body of existing work and one vectored in on private equity and energy as a conduit to move money within a global fraud network. The other drew down on U.S. biosecurity and the long run-up to the offshoring of gain of function work to China. A third and fourth article followed to further confirm broad and specific aspects of the full body of work through the forensic examination of 4,000 U.S. patents by MCAM and Dr. David E. Martin.

Here are those articles:

Follow the Money
Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules
COVID-19: Public Crisis or Opportunistic Marketing Campaign – The Most Important Article To-date
COVID-19: Public Crisis or Opportunistic Marketing Campaign Part II, Martin on Stew Peters with Confirmations and Relevant Data Points

This item is long and complex and this is our objective: coming to understand how discretionary funding at the sole discretion of appointed secretaries and directors; and as appropriated by congress, presents as a federal funding mechanism to build the pandemic construct over a long timeline while overlapping in the same redundant locations found in our full body of work here at Moonshine; and then tying it all together with money through the wide lens of fraud.

If you get lost, re-frame your view through that lens. That said, this wanders because we have a lot of ground to cover and I’m going to be thorough in evidencing the position. There’s a lot here but we’ll bring it all together for meaning.

As we get rolling, remember that these people play inside of a box and that lends towards predictability and precisely so.

Framing It Up

As we’re being leveraged and ushered into a third straight COVID season [peak flu 2021-2022] by the newest boogeyman, which is the Delta variant and precisely as I predicted it on 30 Nov 21 and then proved on 20 Jan 21 and then again in March 2021, let’s stack up more evidence to destruct this fraudulent construct and fight back in our favor.

The Delta variant is being used as a seasonal drag-through to circumvent the seasonal die-off of the co-morbidities being harvested as the primary data driver for the fraudulent COVID construct. In this way, it serves in the same precise capacity as the mid-April shift I identified April 2020.

Once again we’ll look back to see and plan ahead by further enmeshing the fraudulent and criminal aspects of the COVID pandemic by examining it against something I’ve yet to give due diligence and parse out but which is a logical component to it all since it lays a bedrock of healthcare law to serve a construct rooted in healthcare and epidemiology. It’s the Affordable Care Act [ACA] or Obamacare.

After all, if one desires to up end the U.S. by means of a fraudulent construct leveraging a fake pandemic, there is no better place to begin than with a complete overhaul of U.S. healthcare to one’s liking and so as to deign it to serve said construct. That’s elementary.

Most recently, the work has been focused on a presentation intended for third parties and designed as a tool to eviscerate the predicate for the 11 Mar 20 National Emergency Declaration and in so doing, eviscerate all federal and state authority found in the emergency executive powers that were usurped by a criminal enterprise [under RICO.] I have compiled them all into this video. THESE GRAPHICS WERE NEVER INTENDED FOR USE IN A VIDEO and the video is really for the informed reader who already has a firm understanding of the work at Moonshine.

If you’re newer to the work here, you may find the video frustrating and without question, having an already established and informed base of understanding is ideal if not requisite; especially if it’s wet with Moonshine.


We’ll be examining funding very closely so here is the CDC’s operational funding for FY 2019 and FY 2020. It’s a lot of money. Note the respective allocations for aspects of importance: epidemiology, development of vaccines, pandemic preparedness, etc.

Funding will come to bear down with greater might once we outline the finer points on discretionary supplemental funding that is substantial and occurs inside of closed loops with unilateral decree by means of the sole discretion of appointed directors and secretaries. We’ll run down the veiled grains of it to develop a list from which we should be able to identify the 37 hospitals providing the bulk data sets for the CDC’s COVID metrics.

From there, we track to Obamacare/The Affordable Care Act to show how our bedrock foundation is laid and we draw down on it with the discretionary funding.

Questions to Start

Lets’ begin with a tip of the hat to Tore at Tore Says for first bringing sunlight to the Obamacare angles. I haven’t seen/heard any of her work [or others] beyond it as a topic.

Questions to start.

What are the chances that we can find language within the ACA that can be considered foundational pieces of the bedrock to the fraudulent pandemic as I’ve outlined it to-date in hundreds of articles, videos and graphics?

What are the chances that footnotes, citations and sources provide further evidence?

What are the chances that funding is central to it?

What are the chances that we can tie it all back and together for fulsome meaning?

What are the chances that this work – as it always does – generates more pertinent questions to which the CDC/NIH/NIAID cartel has apparently made the answers difficult to find?

Let’s start with this question. Why can’t I find the list of 37 hospitals that contribute to the CDC’s bulk COVID data sets and which drive its metrics and decision-making processes respective to the issuance of guidelines and mitigations; and why can’t I find it relative to the federal dollars they receive in SUPPLEMENTAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING that occurs at the sole discretion of unelected and appointed directors and secretaries?

Why is that so layered and difficult to find? It’s simply a 37-point list of hospitals. To the contrary, what I have discovered is an 81-page document detailing the “scheme” – their words, not mine – and additionally, I have 40 or so open tabs right now – browser not bar – where the information either escapes us or is hidden in a minutia of footnoted code I’ve yet to unskew to deliver the 37.

That said, I think I found the list from which the 37 originate and I think I can prove that and another position – that a minority of urban hubs respective to the balance of the country and as leveraged by federalism overlap in all the right places as discussed momentarily. We can prove it to a degree by running down general and discretionary funding.

Back to questions.

Do they appear in states like NY, CA, PA, GA, NC, AZ, MI, MN and similar others – you know the list? Just see the map overlays in the Soros graphic way down below.

Do those locations have redundant overlaps with COVID mitigation/guidelines enforcement as coinciding with voter fraud and election issues and higher funding/grant amounts? They’re making it difficult to find out but we may have it.

Will we find more compelling evidence that federalism is being leveraged back against the American people?

If you’re drunk on the ‘Shine you already know these answers and if not, the title gave it away.

Here we go.

[Embedded documents and images follow – for embedded documents tap and scroll down within the document to access all pages.]


Our first order of business before digging into the Affordable Care Act [ACA] is drawing attention to how the curation of COVID data occurs because it’s fundamental component to the construct and it falls directly back on Obamacare so we’ll go there next. Doing this will help us understand how, where and why the ACA applies when we talk about it.

Beginning on firm ground and with hard numbers, existing work narrows COVID infection and mortality data providers to 63 entities and here, it’s further narrowed to 37. The takeaway is that conceivably and within a closed loop, the CDC could cherry pick a non-representative data set from within an incomplete operational system; and do so from entities that receive standard and discretionary supplemental federal funding occurring at the sole discretion of appointed [not elected] directors and secretaries embedded in the broader bureaucracy; and then fraudulently propagate it as COVID data. The work here functions to identify that system.

Here’s how COVID data is curated with some graphic illustrations to start.

The buried gold in this is understanding the source of the data for the data driver as fuel for the construct and then finding how the source is strung, funded and controlled. After issuing the NVSS diagnostic memos to steer COVID infection and mortality data to desired and fraudulent ends, the criminal enterprise appears positioned to cherry-pick data from the 37 hospitals they selected as COVID data providers. That data set drives the fraudulent construct and frames determinations of policy for the nation as a whole. Is the entire nation being dominated by 37 major urban areas and are Democratic leaders firmly in control of them?

Here we go beginning with the ambiguous and vague 37 data point.

What’s bothersome and as noted, why isn’t there a public and easy-to-find list of these 37 entities that provide data and receive federal dollars? What are we hiding?

Note that you will see redundant wording in a similar CDC extract below but it’s different in important ways that we’ll latch onto.

Below we’ll note the granular aspects of how the data is collected while paying particular attention to the language that serves fraud; and especially as it relates to the established bulk data set revisions occurring on 26 Aug 20 and 12 May 21. This language permits back-end revisions of data that is subject to change and especially so for anyone looking to change it.

That equates to constructively [fraudulently] formulating the data parameters [footnotes are telling] to serve the intended net effect and then, once the data sets become contradictory to the narrative and conflicting altogether, they simply get revised away on the back end and out of sight.

We’ll start with the bulk revisions the net effect of which is obvious and clearly provides empirical evidence of co-mobridity harvesting as a primary construct driver.

Below we begin to get into those granular aspects of how the data is curated with that similar language I mentioned above. As we do, note that the broader NHCS source data is derived from “Uniform Bill [UB-04] administrative claims” or “electronic health records” from a nationally representative sample of 608 hospitals.

But then a clear, obvious and conflicting distinction is drawn whereby the distinct difference applies to NHCS data providers specifically for COVID data sets, which are only received from 37 hospitals spread throughout the country and just as we noted above. What makes this extract different is the inclusion of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification System for Counties and we’re latching onto that to deliver the list of 37 that we intend to prove with the funding data points; especially discretionary funding.

We talk about compartmentalizing culpability a lot and that’s what this is as I’ve been evidencing in the broader scope for a long time. Empirically and as it relates to the construct, identifying the 37-point list may allow us to draw-down with precision on identifiable components within this closed loop system by vetting it against the top federal funds recipients.

Why did they cleave the COVID data source away from the regular cohort of 608 hospitals? Easier to control. Easier to guarantee. Easier all the way around. Easier to compartmentalize culpability.

How many of those hospitals are located in areas where riots, COVID mitigation enforcement and election fraud were prominent issues and there is a heavy and powerful Democratic presence if not full control or a Republican presence known to be as compromised and corrupt as their Democratic counterparts?

Why can’t I find the list of those 37 hospitals?

I also took specific note of how the data are not nationally representative and in light of the evidence following below this strengthens our positions. Some locations deciding things for other locations.

Here we get into the “scheme” responsible for determining the 37 hospitals that were selected to be the COVID data drivers in the “NCHS urban-rural classification system for counties.”

Here is a graphic representation of it.

This following document entitled 2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties details the formulation of the data provider scheme [interesting word choice in the world of fraud, no?] in 81 pages and it presents with the following description for that formulation; and noting the draw-back to established work on the 2001 timeline as discussed in Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules,

The first NCHS urban–rural scheme, developed in 2001 and referred to as the 1990 census-based NCHS urban–rural scheme, was a six-level classification scheme for counties. This scheme was based on the 1990 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) standards for defining metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) and on data from the 1990 census. It was updated in 2006 (referred to as the 2006 NCHS Urban–Rural Classification Scheme for Counties), following release of MSAs and micropolitan statistical area delineations based on application of the 2000 OMB standards for defining MSAs and micropolitan statistical areas to 2000 census data. A detailed description of the construction of these two schemes is provided in an earlier report (1).

Again, remember that what were doing is coming through 81 pages to dig-out the 37-hospital list. Absurd.

Inside of that document, our previous 63 figure bears down with “Large central metro” considerations relative to federal dollars in 2006 but it doesn’t hold up for 2013, which represents the current model and whereby footnotes make the county classifications malleable and permit skewing the numbers at the skewer’s discretion.

Moreover, there is a bunch of included dialogue, tables and footnotes identifying county classification outliers, the reasons for them and classification changes that contradict their own data parameters. Attempting to unskew it all has been so far fruitless with a less than fulsome understanding of the full data set to permit decoding the skews. Time limitations apply.

Keep in mind that if data from [63?] large metro counties is driving the decisions for the entire country, it fails to take into account that most of America is geographically rural [and remembering that Alaska is not to scale in the images.] This is compounded when we understand that it’s actually 37.

Viral outbreaks present differently in densely populated urban environments as compared to sparsely populated rural ones. So then, we have a real issue if a narrow scope of 37 hospitals were used to drive the metrics to formulate pandemic guidelines and mitigations writ large for the entire country and especially since they so clearly align on exact and precise political lines. This is critically so when coming to understand that in those sparsely populated rural areas the only real threat was fake flu/pneumo data [co-morbidity harvesting.]

That smells like fraud. That looks like more deliberate steering to desired data endpoints.

As we mine stacks of complex documents in an attempt to locate our data targets and then discern and identify them accordingly, there’s a real possibility I’m wrong here. But I don’t think I am because after all, they make stuff like this hard to find on purpose to keep regular folks from finding it. More importantly, I’m following the trail of crumbs they were required to leave as per the box and its rules.

If this is the case and I think it may be, the fraud presents in obvious ways as depicted here urban-rural.

Importantly, we note that despite Leftist and Progressive outrage against statistically [FBI’s own crime data] and demonstrably fraudulent “systemic racism” [the BLM construct] a major portion of America is poorer, white and living in a rural setting; and without urban conveniences. Still though, it appears as if it’s urban areas [the ones under Democratic control forever] that appear to drive the decision making process for the entire nation thus entangling federalism once again. Certain locations deciding things for other locations; especially the ones that don’t have the financial resources to fight back.

From the 81 page document outlining the formulation of the urban-rural scheme, which sets the data providers/data drivers for the construct, we note the occurrence of our ambiguous and vague 63 data point in the following 2 tables but we also recognize the flaws associated with it [2016 v. 2013.]

Here are the footnoted permissions to 1) create rules establishing how the data driving county classifications are assigned with 2) room left to break those rules to steer the data outcomes as desired within the classifications. Or, in other words, make sure you get the ones you want.

This graphic also from the report presents the general concept.

In the extracted pages that follow [Table IV below] we have the list from which I believe we can extract the 37 if we can unskew it, which I think will take more primers than what we currently have but I think we have parts of it. I’ll spend more time with this and searching for 37 in other ways after publishing.

You may care to scroll on through because I gave you all of the pages containing the locations by 53 subgroups and I list the itemized subgroups below the pages. This is Table IV from our document.

Here’s the the itemized list of the sub-groups derived from the previous pages. The itemized list presents as urban hub areas consisting of a county or a conglomeration of counties. The 37 COVID data providing hospitals should come from this list and if controlled for redundant/overlapping locations, we can likely narrow it further to some accurate degree. We’re going to use funding as one control to examine this list and unskew it for the 37.

  • Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
  • Austin-Round Rock, TX
  • Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
  • Birmingham-Hoover, AL
  • Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
  • Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY
  • Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
  • Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI
  • Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN
  • Cleveland-Elyria, OH
  • Columbus, OH
  • Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
  • Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO
  • Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
  • Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI
  • Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT
  • Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
  • Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN
  • Jacksonville, FL
  • Kansas City, MO-KS
  • Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV
  • Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
  • Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN
  • Memphis, TN-MS-AR
  • Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
  • Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI
  • Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
  • Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN
  • New Orleans-Metairie, LA
  • New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
  • Oklahoma City, OK
  • Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
  • Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
  • Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ
  • Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
  • Providence-Warwick, RI-MA
  • Raleigh, NC
  • Richmond, VA
  • Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
  • Rochester, NY
  • Sacramento–Roseville–Arden-Arcade, CA
  • San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
  • San Diego-Carlsbad, CA
  • San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA
  • San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
  • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
  • St. Louis, MO-IL
  • Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
  • Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC
  • Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

We really need the exact list of 37 to better understand how the COVID is curated and how it fits into the construct I’ve demonstrated.

When we get it, I want to vet it against the discretionary funding mechanisms I’m outlining next relative to the ACA, the stolen election, Soros’ prosecutorial grabs, anomalies in federalism and more.

Really, I want to see the funding because funding and grants create documentation. If this list of 37 is the same list or is included in the list of top recipients of discretionary funds, then we’re likely standing of firm ground.

What happens when we vet all of that against those who are entangled in private equity and we identify ties back to those 37 hospitals?

I think we’re standing on firm ground.

I’m also going to be embarrassed if someone sends me the link for the exact list because I’ve looked every way I know to look and I can’t find it. It would be disappointing if I overlooked something obvious or easily accessible. Really I’d be happy to get it though.

For now, hold on to 37 and our list above because we’re going to come back to it post-ACA. Let’s diverge into Obamacare to understand the roots for 37 and to see the ACA’s broader impact on it all relative to epidemiology, pandemic, infectious outbreaks and all of the regular and customary things you find in a global fraud scheme built around a fake pandemic.


Let’s begin with the ACA itself and we’ll get right to brass tacks.

Building on established positions and evidence by years and spades, the Affordable Care Act appears to evidence the laying of the foundation for an overthrow constructed around a pandemic constructed around fraudulently propagated infection and mortality data.

Our ACA lenses are federal funding, federal grant money, recipients thereof, “surveillance,” the 37 entities that provide the bulk COVID data that factor into the CDC/NIH/NIAID pandemic guidelines and the ACA; and all collectively viewed through our primary fraud lens.

The methods here do not include reading the entire bill; time limitations apply. The results here are delivered by searching the bill for key terms.

As we get into this remember that in fraud and because of the box and its rules, the players essentially have to put their intentions down on paper or in this case, within the language of a piece of legislation. Just like we unskew numbers to find real and accurate values here we unskew language to understand how it veils the truth and serves the construct.

In the ACA, we find this with the understanding that Obama sought to “fundamentally change” America when he entered office in January 2009. In order to do that within a fraudulent construct, sole discretion to award funding, grants and financial incentives are framed under fraudulent pretenses. Here we have both and noting how “TRANSFORMATION GRANTS” applies to another foundational position stating that federalism serves as the enforcement mechanism for the construct. It plays out as awarding competitive grants with sole discretion and whereby “State and local government agencies and community-based organizations” [federalism] receive the funds for the “implementation” of the transformation.

As the entry describes “transforming communities” under the guise of healthcare being delivered by the equivalent of your local DMV branch, recall the backdrop already in place: Biden is a Chinese proxy who is facilitating the application of Chinese doctrine [primarily One Belt, One Road] to the U.S. by means of the forthcoming infrastructure bill and his Executive authority writ large.

What follows is so critical to everything and like many other angles, no one else talks about it but we Moonshiners. Perhaps that’s because the evidenced position discussed in multiple articles is dead-on in an era of unprecedented censorship.

The critical point is this.

Chinese doctrine leverages energy as its financial arm [One Belt, One Road and where the CCP serves as the political arm] and in the same vein, infrastructure is the primary mechanism to accomplish political objectives and change. Infrastructure then becomes a primary mechanism that permits the CCP to apply political doctrine to the real world, in real tangible ways and whereby infrastructure is the interface to desired change.

Rinse/repeat here and now with Biden.

Now you know why Pelosi/Schumer/Democrats refused to do infrastructure with President Trump and insist upon it now.

Now you know why Biden’s infrastructure bill’s elements are far, far beyond the sphere of what infrastructure really is and more closely align with “fundamentally” changing America under fraudulent pretenses as is found in EVERYTHING THEY DO.

Now you know why Obamacare had to pass and become law and now you know why a supposedly Republican, Conservative and compromised Chief Justice John Roberts made sure Obamacare stuck.

Pelosi/Schumer/Democrats refused to do infrastructure with Trump because they were preserving the CCP’s primary mechanism to affect change in real and tangible ways.

Rinse/repeat here and now with Biden.

I took the time to outline that because it’s critical and no one else talks about it but us. Mot importantly, it enmeshes or marries the ACA to infrastructure. The ACA therefore serves the construct as the interface that permits infrastructure to be reciprocally infused into healthcare and healthcare into infrastructure.

It’s like infrastructure and healthcare “become friends with benefits” and China is infrastructure’s pimp.

Here we show you where and how we think that is happening.

In summary and to move forward, if infrastructure serves as the the direct application of a mechanism for change, then by entangling infrastructure, healthcare and epidemiology together in reciprocating legislation where each includes the others, it lays a bedrock foundation in U.S. law that works against the American people and for the Chinese as explained and in ways that are entirely serviceable to a pandemic fraudulent construct. Probably just a coincidence.

Another bedrock position for us is that our nation’s biggest scab – slavery, the Civil Rights Movement, etc. – is being picked and leveraged back against the people as an enforcement and offensive mechanism. See the entanglement of Antifa and BLM and all of their subsequent incendiary, riotous and murderous mayhem circa the summer of 2020 to the present.

Even further, see the dearth of prosecution in locales that also feature George Soros’ installed prosecutors and consider them all relative to the disproportionate and political prosecution of the 06 Jan 21 Capitol “insurrectionists.”

In that light, here is our map overlay as also noted above relative to federalism. We’re currently enduring modern era World War II Nazi era propaganda being enforced by Nazi tactics. Period. For anyone who disagrees, open a history book already and utilize that lens, please. The map evidences it. Some locations deciding things for other locations.

Through the broader lens I have put together for us, which centers on transforming communities, let’s read this bedrock language from the ACA and then you can decide for yourself if it would be beneficial in a situation that entailed overthrowing the nation under the guise of a fraudulent pandemic and applying infrastructure as the politically dogmatic change mechanism.

As you do and although not highlighted, see how this becomes unilateral at the CDC director’s sole discretion. It is again emblematic of the layered and redundant control systems deliberately enmeshed in this other worldly fraud construct.

In the following we note the annual tie back to the director on important matters that we’ve already discussed in previous work including using mental health to cleave away Second Amendment rights from Americans relative to the explosion of mental health ads contemporaneously found in legacy media and entertainment writ large. Remember, the root word of surveillance is SURVEY.

Then we arrive at this. Meat and potatoes. Brass tacks. Incriminating evidence? Likely.

Below, we’ll note the following.

First, the focus is ‘Public Health Surveillance Systems” relative to “Epidemiology Capacity Grants.” Epidemiology obviously gets our attention and let us not forget that “surveillance” equates to monitoring and providing – or exchanging – information.

From there, the grant recipients are being financially incentivized to “transform” their communities using “innovation” that applies to surveillance and monitoring.

We also note that federalism again bears down as the construct enforcement mechanism since the grants go to “State” and “local” health departments, which are the agencies that issue the mitigations and guidelines as per the CDC/NIH/NIAID; and in the form of gubernatorial edicts that do not constitute law a passed by any state legislature.

Importantly, Fauci, Birx, Pence or even Trump were never directly responsible for the closing or shuttering of anything – they only issued guidelines that were adopted and then enforced at state and local levels – federalism. It cuts both ways. They use it as the construct enforcement mechanism and we can leverage it back against them.

Continuing, this below gives the CDC director sole discretion and complete control inside of a closed loop to allocate the grants/funds. That equates to paying the entities you want for the reasons you want when you want.

Note the continued language of “improving information systems” relative to “information exchange” against the backdrop of “innovation,” grants and the vaccine passport unfolding now.

Also note that the funding is based upon congressional appropriations so Congress can control the entire thing via funding via the appropriation committees in the House and Senate; and as directly and respectively controlled by Pelosi and Schumer.

Take all of that and view it through the lens of the vaccine passport system that’s currently being innovated.

Will you see bedrock pieces? Probably.

In the above extract, the concept of Trump’s vaccine program rises to the surface and in the extract below, we note how the President reserves the right to make the pandemic determination and this draw back on our position that the 11 Mar 20 National Emergency Declaration removed that right from him and compelled Trump to legally defer to his experts, who happen to be the usurping criminal enterprise in the construct. Full circle for them.

We’ll be latching on to the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Grant Program [ELC.]

The Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Grant Program

We note that the director of the NIH again reserves the right to decide grant allocation unilaterally based upon the innovation of technologies; and that surveillance mechanisms are attached to experimental products and their alignment with regulatory requirements. Does this sound like experimental mRNA vaccines and vaccine passports?

The type and quality of the listed institutions also comports with the ones that Fauci was engaged with relative to gain of function research [labs and universities like Ralph Baric’s at University of North Carolina or the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston and many more.]

This is the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Prevention and Control of Emerging Infectious Diseases [ELC] cited in the ACA.

Apparently and coinciding with Clinton’s anticipated 2016 victory that was undone by a legitimate Trump win, the ELC serves to pickle the pandemic engine with gas as comporting with the expectation that the COVID pandemic would unfold on the same 2016-2017 timeline we’ve outlined and not the 2019-2020-2021 timeline as per the Trump interruption, which we’ve also outlined.

The images above evidence this as does the ordering of “COVID test kits” circa 2017. COVID wasn’t even created as a pandemic namesake until 11 Feb 20 ergo you can’t have a thing before you actually have the thing, as Dr. Martin likes to put it.

Based upon the evidence, our position is a reasonable one.

This is the ELC cooperative agreement that also indicates funding allocations. We note the 63 figure [Cross-cutting Epidemiology & Laboratory Capacity Program] at the top of page 2 since previous work establishes that the CDC’s bulk COVID data comes from 63 entities that receive federal dollars as I mentioned at the beginning. Are these the 63 and now 37 that provide bulk data? [Tap the document and scroll within it to see the table containing 63.]

The following images represent the ELC’s receipt history and noting the locations [federalism] draws back on our established [via patents and Dr. David E. Martin’s work at MCAM] timeline and further extends it from 1999 to 1995 relative to biosecurity, epidemiology and patent filings. Note these locations from the ELC relative to the map overlay graphic above: Colorado, Georgia, Florida, New York City, Los Angeles County, New York, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Illinois, Arizona, North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Houston, Philadelphia, Delaware, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, D.C., and Chicago. ALL OF THESE LOCATIONS are entangled in all of the work at Moonshine and in ways that all draw down on Orange Man Bad, fake pandemics and stolen elections. They all got discretionary federal money and it’s all of the usual suspects.

This is the ELC’s officers structure noting the 63 recipients within 64 jurisdictions.

Here are the officers.

This is the ELC’s 5-year focus with COVID in the cross-hairs.

Okay, here is where 37 begins to bear down again as thrust forward by Obamacare.

What follows are PDFs from the list above [Awards Prior to FY 2020] as embedded into the article to depict ELC funding awards over time and per recipient. It will be important to also apply a political pork spending lens and for example, how red states like Indiana and Kentucky and others factor towards the top via IN/Pence, Ky/McConnell, etc. Here they are.

Here we take note of the umbrella entity that encompasses the ELC as we’ve outlined it. It’s the “Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections” [DEPI] and it serves as a tip of the spear for pandemic response. Therein, we again note the director’s sole discretion for funding relative to locations [federalism.] The important aspects are highlighted and as you evaluate them, ask yourself if leveraging these components with money would be useful in our fraudulent pandemic. We also note the overlap with bioterrorism thus providing a robust agency to leverage in a pandemic construct.

Here we evidence how funding works per the appropriations committees and we note an example of funding and preparations for an influenza pandemic like the one we’re in [fraudulently] right now.

From this bill, again note the sole discretion of the Secretary to expend allotted funding.

Here we evidence more appropriations considerations for pandemic preparedness as another example.

In this bill and under “Title VII: General Provisions – Sets forth certain limits and prohibitions on the use of appropriations for specified activities,” we note the following and specifically as it relates to a host of other relevant data points typically associated with narrative talking points [levers]: whistleblowers, political opportunities, human trafficking and women, children and equity.

ACA and ELC for 37

Now that we understand what the ELC does, how it applies to Obamacare, how Obamacare provides a bedrock of enmeshed and reciprocating legislation that perfectly services a fraudulent pandemic construct, let’s take the ELC’s base and COVID funding as of June 2021 [from the PDF above] and rank all of the states in order of federal dollars received.

From there, we’ll then take our earlier itemized sub-group list of large metro areas thought to contain our 37 data providing hospitals and cross-reference the two lists to vet them against each other. This should render-out evidence supporting that the federal dollars flowed to a small contingency of 37 select urban hubs that are dominating the nation and driving all of the fraudulent pandemic’s data.

It doesn’t take long to see that our jug holds Moonshine. Via funding and through the first 22 rankings alone, we can account for most of the list. Here’s the spreadsheet work detailing the findings.


If there’s an easy button to find the 37 contributing hospitals to the bulk COVID data set, I’m oblivious to it. I looked everywhere and for a long time.

Even if there is and I just couldn’t find it for one dumb reason or another, all of this work serves our case very well because we can prove aspects of the positions in thoroughly hashed out and logically deduced ways that leave little room for other explanations.

There’s little doubt now as to whether we’ve uncovered a mechanism to allocate federal funding with complete and total discretion from Congress right down to appointed secretaries and directors; and it even provides the flexibility to erase inconvenient data points while permitting the unilateral allocation of money to preferred and desired entities.

Can we say with absolute certainty that this is the system or that it was and is being used this way? No. Can we follow the money to the same redundant locations and make logical deductions evidencing it? Yes.

A lot of elbow grease and Moonshine in this one. I think our jug is water-tight on concept and we have a good idea, but we still need that list of 37.

Why have they made it so hard to find? Rhetorical question.


A Beholden and Bad Bill Barr Betrayed the Boss

A beholden and bad Bill Barr, the former two-term U.S. Attorney General and point man for the Department of Justice who was first appointed by George H.W. Bush and later served as the replacement for a beleaguered and recused Jeff Sessions as the Attorney General of the United States for President Donald J. Trump, betrayed his boss – President Trump. More recently, we have the capstone piece of evidence that galvanizes and finalizes our position on Barr, which had been controversial and hotly contested in the backdrop of Moonshine; and with some in our group having previously held faith in him. Barr led us to some infighting but I do all of the work, reading, researching, writing, etc. – literally all of what appears at Moonshine – so that work prevailed resulting in the earlier notions that Barr was somehow situated for good being dispatched forever and for cause.

I also wish those guys had been right because coming down on the right side of the Bill Barr line means coming down on the wrong side of what America needs and needed. Tragic falls short of appropriate, here.

Moving forward, we’re latching on to federalism, compromise, infiltration and prosecutorial discretion as you’ll see and come to understand. All of these will hammer beholden and bad Bill’s nail straight into the board and entirely so.

In a bedrock of long established and exclusive work, we have the evidence to this end and it presents in spades. Collectively, it leaves precisely zero room for alternative explanations on Barr. There’s no doubt about it and the picture is crystalline and presents with unmatched clarity. A beholden and bad Bill Barr betrayed the boss. It starts there and unfortunately, it ended there. At least for now.

As the foundation of Moonshine work puts forth and on a generational timeline, this nation was infiltrated and including by people compromised or subject to being compromised. This infiltration, which leverages federalism as a primary lever in the collection of fraudulent, reciprocal and mutually serving constructs that converge onto one political continuum and underpin the totality of treason that we’ve established and evidenced, draws us down on a timeline that reaches back to at least the Kennedy era in contemporary terms.

The leveraging of federalism back against Americans also delivered the color revolution and overthrow as unfolding in specific states, counties and municipalities within the contexts of and not limited to COVID guidelines enforcement; summer riots, mayhem and domestic terrorism and, most importantly, the stolen 2020 election. Federalism is responsible for it all as Moonshine first pointed out long ago.

The buried gold in it is such that you don’t have to overthrow the entire U.S. to overthrow the entire U.S. but rather install [infiltration] just enough of the right people [compromised] in the just right places and within the right locations [federalism.] See all of the numerous Moonshine map overlays that make this point redundantly and ad nauseam, like the composite one below.

On this generational timeline that transits multiple presidencies and represents an intentional disintegration of the culpability for it all; and across the administrations of George H.W. Bush to Bill Clinton to George W. Bush to Barack Obama and, if things had gone according to plan, to Hillary Clinton, Donald John Trump presents as the complete and total non-politico outlier who somehow “un-rigged” a rigged election and won 2016 legitimately.

Since then, the previous chain of presidencies has linked back to one of its own with the Chinese proxy, Joe Biden. The accelerated pace we’ve been ushered through since Biden’s inauguration represents them working in catch-up mode to account for the 4-year Trump gap in that chain. It’s obvious like Mike Tyson punching you in the face.

The evidence for this is found in things like U.S. patent filings and executive orders that bridge two presidencies contiguous to the time around presidential transition and when an outgoing president hands an incoming one authority found in a freshly minted executive order that normally falls outside of or pushes Constitutional boundaries.

It’s emblematic of why “orange man bad” became a thing and it’s why feeble-minded Amerikans incapable of divorcing themselves from political dogma and partisan ways, which absolutely prevent any form of independent and critical thinking as fueled by objective and reliable evidence, swill the propagated and state-sponsored orange elixir and to the point of inebriation.

These incapable people are the only impediment that matters at this point. All of the treasonous and political hay is already in the barn or about ready to be and so those incapable of independent and critical thought present the last remaining barrier between enslavement and freedom. As this group goes so goes the rest of us at least until the rest of us decide to do something differently. I’m waiting and have been for a long time.

Digressing and four tumultuous years later, President Trump is on the outside looking in; perhaps wondering what happened and perhaps not, but most certainly out of office and with all of us hanging in the balance as the country criminally and under irrefutably and demonstrably fraudulent and treasonous circumstances slips into full-bore Marxist communism at the hands of a Chinese proxy in Joe Biden.

Once replacing a Russian recused Sessions, Barr was riding shotgun for Trump as point man at the Department of Justice and as situated with the full might and authority; and the full spectrum and array of assets, tools and otherwise, of the DOJ, FBI, the full Judiciary and other vectors within the federal apparatus and under the DOJ’s jurisdiction. What did Barr do with his unmatched and unparalleled arsenal?

Not a damn thing. He offered plenty of hyperbolic bluster that equates to political masturbation in the sense it just feels good but doesn’t accomplish anything. The evidence says he did this just as he was tasked to do and for the primary reason outlined by Moonshine long ago – as a delay strategy and to obfuscate and veil the truth.

Barr is no different than all of the rest of these compromised and infiltrating miscreants who don’t just accidentally end up in particularly weighty positions like serving as a two-term AG transiting multiple presidencies. To someone with a modicum of understanding relative to actual statecraft, we brand this person a “fixer” and this becomes especially so after latching onto this notion as examined against the bedrock of exclusive and extensive proprietary work into Barr’s background and the appropriate analysis of it. It collectively demonstrates in irrefutable, undeniable and replicable fashion that not only are the finer points on Barr accurate, but they evidence the primary overarching constructs in the foundation of Moonshine work.

It’s all identifiable in the open sources I utilized and all of it underpins all that plagues us today. It’s as easy as saying that around every corner; in every crack; in every hole; in every shadow and sometimes even cast in full daylight, an infiltrator is to be found – just like beholden and bad Bill Barr.

We’re living through the end stages of a communist, Marxist overthrow at the hands of China and as subject to the tactics and propaganda of World War II Nazi Germany. If that sounds excessive or egregious, take in the roughly 220 articles I’ve penned so far and then get back to me with evidence to the contrary. Good luck because there’s no other way to identify and understand the evidence and it comes in spades. I’ve already provided it in spades and today is the capstone for Barr; until of course, we find more later and we will as time restraints bear down.

Below is one of my favorite images from the Trump presidency; if not the favorite, and it’s tainted by Barr’s presence like a port wine stain on the face of all that is good, decent, American and necessary to live freely as God intended. It’s a resolute President Trump making his way to St. John’s on the back end of it having been desecrated and burned by domestic terrorists serving as contemporary brown shirt functionaries and doing the bidding of their principals – the Deep State [Democrats] and their sugar daddy, George Soros.

Sans the logo bottom right, I had this printed on canvas and sent to everyone in the backdrop of Moonshine.

With a rich sense of irony and drawing back on our World War II timeline, Prescott Bush – George H. W. Bush’s father – funded the Nazis in World War II while George Soros betrayed his own Jewish people by looting their valuables for the Nazis and for the express purpose of his own self-preservation.

This is the epitome of being compromised and compromise is where infiltration begins.

Pause and take this in. Here, you’ll gather succinctly how George Soros escaped evil by becoming evil and in his own words – deliberately, explicitly and absolutely. It’s entirely emblematic of how Soros – by means of compromise, infiltration and federalism – landed at the doorstep of every American to render this nation into a Marxist, communist, hell hole banana republic that has all of the good banana republics laughing at us.

Here’s the map overlay image discussed above and it reinforces and evidences our positions on Soros. Here we fully latch on to our exclusive and longstanding position that federalism has been and is being leveraged back against Americans as an execution [ability to carry out] and enforcement mechanism in the broader coup construct.

How do you overthrow the U.S.? By leveraging it’s own Constitution back against it under fraudulent pretenses – federalism.

Look closely and pay particular attention to how each map represents a different context but where certain locations replicate consistently.

If I’m incorrect about federalism, compromise and infiltration, then why do the same locations repeat regardless of the anti-American context that can be interchanged to produce those same locales over and over and over? And you can tie multiple streams of money to those locations? Rhetorical questions. I’m not wrong and the map overlays tell the same damn story, in all of the same damn locations, every damn time.

If I’m incorrect, then why is it that every time we pull a string, it threads back to this cartel; this criminal enterprise; and this cadre of infiltrators like the Bushes, the Clintons, Obama, Gates, Soros and, of course, beholden and bad Bill Barr? Why do all of the strings tie back to China – like Bill Barr’s? Or Russia – like Bill Barr’s?

Let’s now apply simple logical deduction relative to the above image to gain meaning and fully make our point. To do so, ask yourself this question. If it were imperative for George Soros to fund/purchase [compromise] prosecutors in all of the right locations [federalism] so as to install selected individuals [infiltration] to inherit the authority [prosecutorial discretion] that is inherent in those positions, would it make sense to also ensure that the NATION’S HIGHEST RANKING PROSECUTOR was also in pocket?

The answer is an obvious ‘yes.’ Enter beholden and bad Bill Barr.

To evidence the notion of prosecutorial discretion as I’m outlining it, we latch on to two contemporaneous news events we’ll discuss momentarily; one being the final nail in Barr’s pathetic and treasonous coffin. Underpinning both is prosecutorial discretion in and of itself and whereby the foundation for the execution of American jurisprudence gives the jurisdictional prosecutor the sole decision making power to prosecute or not.

Save those positions ascended to by appointment, generally speaking the position of prosecutor in an electable one and prosecutorial discretion permits the prosecutor to do important things: 1) manage the political career, 2) apply the law with fidelity, 3) enforce the law with prosecutions where the evidence reaches an appropriate threshold and 4) decline to prosecute cases that can’t be made to the same suitable threshold.

It’s the fourth point that bears down hardest and in the case of beholden and bad Bill Barr and with all of the prosecutors Soros has purchased. All Barr ever did was get pissed, hot and bothered anytime someone accused him one way or the other but where he declined to prosecute anything and everything put in front of him save Kevin Clinesmith. See Clinesmith’s slap on the wrist as scraps fed to the proletariat in the vein of “I did my job, see, Constitution.” Pathetic. Traitor. Scum. Infiltrator. Compromised. Discretely prosecutorial and by design.

Here our two recent news events bear down in the broader spectrum. First is Merrick Garland’s prosecutorial discretion whereby he, Nancy Pelosi and presumably Mike Pence relish in seeing Garland’s discretion to prosecute any and all MAGAites invited into the U.S. Capitol on 06 Jan 21 by a Capitol Police force that stood down, opened the doors and rolled-out the red carpet.

Meanwhile and thanks to Garland’s Barr-like prosecutorial discretion, BLM, Antifa and otherwise brown shirts remain free, at large and poised to pick back up with the burning, looting, rioting and murdering they levied last summer. Those headlines are copiously available for you to find independently and I’ve covered them in ink and imagery in no fewer than ONE TWO THREE items.

The other news event is our final one and it was the issuance of a letter delineating how beholden and bad Bill Barr’s direct orders, as underpinned by prosecutioral discretion, were handed down from the nation’s highest ranking prosecutoiral office thus ordering that there will be no investigation or prosecution for the stolen 2020 election.

From the letter penned by Former U.S. Attorney of the Eastern District of PA William McSwain, which is produced in full below and as sourced at TGP, we net the following,

Now and in light of all that has preceded this; and considering that beholden and bad Bill Barr’s net worth is in the tens of millions of dollars [roughly estimated at $40mm-$70mm], consider this extract from one of the Moonshine article’s linked below, which I penned on 17 Nov 20,

We’re building on the previous two articles. In the first item, I established how AG William Barr had returned to Kirkland & Ellis in 2017 and was situated there at a time that Kirkland & Ellis was advising Staple Street Capital on it’s partial acquisition of Dominion Voting Systems, which has a clear tie to Smartmatic, which we’ve only examined at a cursory level thus far.

Herein, we’ll expand a bit more on Smartmatic’s role. Herein, we are also again compelled to ask, what did Bill Barr know, when did he know it and what were and are his intentions upon reentering the Department of Justice for a second stint as Attorney General and with that information?

Smartmatic systems were widely used in the 2020 election and in recent statements related to the company, counselor for both President Trump and Lt. General Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell, has indicated that the President had previously borne witness to previous stolen elections, which likely includes the stolen 2012 Venezuelan election whereby Smartmatic delivered the result.

Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, is the Vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds and his Open Society Institute and he serves as Vice‐President at the World Bank, which I directly tied to the COVID-19 construct and the issuance of pandemic bonds. In 2014, Brown joined with Smartmatic’s CEO to begin SGO and Brown served as Chairman of the board steering the company to handling the automation of the electoral process for a host of countries including the U.S. Notable is that in a September of 2015 interview, Brown admitted to a licensing agreement with Dominion.

For the relevance of Brown to bear down with full might, consider his aforementioned affiliation with George Soros in relation to the article linked below. It was article number one in what now nears 80 articles on this fake pandemic. NUMBER ONE. THE START. THE GENESIS OF IT ALL.

Political Moonshine

Add to it this from another Moonshine article also linked below and penned 02 Dec 20,

The 2020 election occurred with Dominion/Smartmatic systems in use and the genesis of Dominion/Smartmatic draws back to the Venezuelan government. Now we factor in that Dominion has been acquired by China (UBS) and whereby the patents to those same systems were previously acquired by China (HSBC Toronto) and whereby China deliberately launched a bio-weapon of mass destruction against the US so as to construct the landscape that was necessary to leverage those acquisitions.

All of that happened while AG Barr was situated at Kirkland & Ellis, the firm guiding the original sale of Dominion to Staple Street and whereby Barr now, as AG, either stated or misstated recently that he’s not “seen” election fraud rising to the level such that it could affect the 2020 vote result. This is the same Barr that recently and quietly appointed John Durham as special counsel to investigate Crossfire Hurricane, but 4 years too late and in a capacity that now stands to compromise President’ Trump’s ability to move forward with declassification.

That’s where we are. That’s the picture to be understood. Who in the hell is William Barr and whom does he represent? Dominion/Smartmatic/China or Trump and the American people.

Political Moonshine

If you care to consume all of our articles regarding Barr, I’ve linked them for you chronologically at the bottom. I’ve also left a few notes to help you identify the weightier ones. Therein and as a quick sidebar, you’ll note articles that encompass Q or the misnomer QAnon and so for the sake of fidelity to the cause, recall our position on – Q Disclaimer: No matter if you believe Q to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, Q has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while legacy media has consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig-out the information from the cryptic prompts but in so doing, the doorways are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to objectively enter.

We insist in hanging our hat on evidence at Moonshine and early in my career, I learned that if you’re willing to stand on and ride it out and no matter how peculiar the details become, evidence will deliver you to the truth and the truth is always stranger than fiction. In our case with Barr and with all of Moonshine work we allow Constitutional civics to frame it all and when we apply the concepts of federalism, compromise, infiltration and prosecutorial discretion against the backdrop of Barr’s history and resume, we arrive at concrete conclusions as already demonstrated.

I wish I could leave you with some promise for the immediate and short future but I can’t; not right now, at least. The reason for that is simple. If you believe that a full shot of beholden and bad Bill Barr left a foul taste in your mouth, wait until you get a full shot of Merrick Garland. Be ready to spit it out.

Maybe August will be different. They say it gets real hot in August. We’ll see.

Here is the McSwain letter in full and following it are the Moonshine articles on Barr.

A beholden and bad Bill Barr betrayed the boss and because of it and for the time being, America may have been lost forever.

Beholden. Bad. Betrayer. Infiltrator. Traitor. All the same. All Bill Barr. That is the Barr legacy.


[The full list of linked Moonshine articles featuring Barr is beneath the following letter.]

Moonshine on Barr

The following represents a chronological list of Moonshine articles that include Bill Barr in some capacity.

01 Jan 20: GIULIANI CONFIRMS MULTIPLE ANGLES – Timeline, corruption, attribution, Ukraine

05 Jan 20: ARE WE BEARING WITNESS TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S IRAQ EXIT STRATEGY? Examining moves and countermoves in the Iran/ Iraq event as a withdrawal strategy


Any article like the following one that references ‘institutional preservation’ is important and will bear down on prosecutorial discretion.





12 Feb 20: LEFT’S POST-IMPEACHMENT STRATEGY SHIFTS – Barr and DOJ now primary targets

The following article is notable as an early glimpse of Barr’s questionable status.





25 Mar 20: COVID-19, IMPEACHMENT AND THE W.H.O. BRAID TOGETHER LIKE A ROPE: Overlaying 3 timelines to demonstrate COVID-19 as a political construct shielded by the diversion of impeachment

30 Mar 20: INCREDIBLE EMERGING STORY LINE IMPACTS COVID-19 THEORY: Links Wuhan, intelligence reports, bio-weapons, the WHO/Bill Gates, FBI and FISA all on the same timeline





06 May 20: Making the Case for Treason

13 May 20: Making the Case for Treason Part II: Crossfire Razor and the Rogue Nuclear Arsenal

18 May 20: Making the Case for Treason Part IV: The Fatal Flynn Fact Set and the Lethality it Delivers

10 Jun 20: Lawlessness, Anarchy and Riotous Murder

13 Jun 20: Making the Case for Treason Part VI: Judge Sullivan and His Unconstitutional Third Corner in a Two Corner Fight

06 Aug 20: Yates’ Testimony Telling, Timely and Troublesome

12 Aug 20: Fateful Flynn and the Full Court, ‘Was It a Bribe or Was It Brady?’

31 Aug 20: Treason in the U.S. Senate?

02 Sep 20: Did QAnon Just Directly Tie Compromised U.S. Lawmakers to China and in the Worst Way?

04 Sep 20: Amerika’s Gang Problem – John Brennan and the Gang of 8

13 Sep 20: Cauldron of Criminality Makes for Hell on Earth

19 Sep 20: Ginsburg Begins the Fiery Spiral to Absolute Bottom and That’s a Good Thing

20 Sep 20: Sinister Soros Set Amerika Ablaze!

25 Sep 20: Flynn First Through the Looking Glass

12 Oct 20: We Caught Them Cold, We Have Them Cold, What Now?

22 Oct 20: The Biden Crime Family and The Real Candidate – An Update on Recent Developments

30 Oct 20: The Promise of Dark Winter

Starting here, the bulk of the evidence against Barr relative to the stolen election, Dominion, China, patents, Kirkland & Ellis, etc. begins. It all forms the highly complex and nebulous landscape underpinning our position on Barr.

01 Nov 20: All Holds Barred

04 Nov 20: Post-Election Day Perspective

07 Nov 20: I Hope to God During An Excruciating Status Quo


11 Nov 20: Certifying the Election and Why It Matters

12 Nov 20: CISA Bears Down Amidst Stolen Election

16 Nov 20: What Did AG William Barr Know About Dominion Acquisition?

16 Nov 20: Dominion: From Barr, Kirkland and Ellis to Comey, HSBC

17 Nov 20: Did China Steal the Keys to the Castle? Do Dominion, Smartmatic, Sequoia & HSBC Tie Stolen Election to California PERS?

19 Nov 20: THE PLAN: Institutions, a Stolen Election and a War Footing With China

28 Nov 20: Biden Likely Enveloped by DOJ Press Release Linking Iran and Venezuela

29 Nov 20: Flynn/McInerney Interview: Critical Confirmations Across the Board

01 Dec 20: Baffling Barr Backs Down Again – Insufficient Voter Fraud Evidence to Affect Election Result

02 Dec 20: Staple Street Capital to UBS to China

02 Dec 20: Trump Card Barred – Declassification?

This marks the end of the sequence of articles that heavily outlines Barr’s placement as described in the previous note.

03 Dec 20: Pelosi Continuity of Government Plan Relative to Interesting Trump Comments Clouds Barr Picture

12 Dec 20: The Only Bridge Between Reality and Hope: The US Military

01 Jun 21: Follow the Money

08 Jun 21: Revisiting Obama’s Application of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine and the COVID-19 Blueprint to Overthrow America

17 Jun 21: The Federal Bureau of Instigation

21 Jun 21: BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA, BIG MONEY: Full Circle to the D.C. Swamp

22 Jun 21: BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA, BIG MONEY: Full Circle to the D.C. Swamp Part II – Political Contributions by BlackRock and Vanguard

27 Jul 21: COVID-19: Public Crisis or Opportunistic Marketing Campaign Part II, Martin on Stew Peters with Confirmations and Relevant Data Points

The Power of Pretext: Russia, China and Proxy Joe Make for a Potentially Ominous Future

Pretext is something that we routinely hunt for at Moonshine and it can be incredibly valuable if properly identified and understood. Pretext is a deliberate and often times cunning maneuver that can situate any administration – good or bad – to take action – good or bad – and then be retrospectively positioned to circle-back to it in “We told you so” fashion; especially for the “bad.”

How many times have you seen a snarky Psaki-like spokesperson or politician deliver the “We told you this was coming” line? Of course you did because you subsequently made it happen. That is the buried gold in pretext: This is what will happen; this happens; we told you this would happen; look at how smart we are.

Rinse/repeat for feeble minded Americans incapable of independent and critical thinking. Rinse/repeat to control the narrative ergo control the people. The power of pretext.

Let us not forget that as a tactic, pretext can be delivered for more than one purpose meaning it serves its original intent – to establish as the sown narrative the literal message found in the pretext, whatever that may be – but it may also and simultaneously serve another objective, like establishing a deflection point away from something to obfuscate it and make it more difficult to identify and understand.

The Flynn-Russia story and the timeline for its release is a perfect example of using a single bit of pretext to deflect away from and obfuscate something else valued as more critical and relevant. It does this while simultaneously delivering the intended sown narrative talking point.

Examining this images below, you’ll note that the Flynn story was leaked to legacy media at a very precise time as coordinated by the Obama White House and that timeline was within the rough 24-hours preceding the legally compulsory presidential transition meetings in 2017. I’ve branded it the most important timeline in contemporary U.S. history because it is and no else seems to regard it as so. They’ve entirely missed the boat here.

The Flynn-Russia leak did three things: 1) it created a cloud of controversy during the transition meetings in which Flynn was participating because Trump’s transition team was aware of the fraudulent nature and timing of the allegations later irrefutably proved to be false and fabricated, 2) it deflected away from the content of the pretext being sown and specifically that was the insertion of a viral pandemic construct into Trump’s administration by means of it being included as a transition meeting topic and 3) it laid the foundation for the sown “Russian collusion” narrative that would later be specifically leveraged to open a vector to undermine and attack Trump’s administration [akin to setting a trap.]

The Russian collusion narrative was established to drive a fraudulent Mueller probe and further the hollow call for the fraudulent impeachment 1.0 that began immediately after Trump’s 2016 victory. The fraudulent impeachment then required a shift in tactics because there was no evidence to support the Russian collusion narrative save the obviously fabricated variety.

Therefore, the fraudulent impeachment 1.0 morphed into the Ukrainian diplomatic call with President Trump, which was then eviscerated when Trump trumped them and released the call transcript.

Just like the alleged Flynn meetings were entirely normal compared against historical, conventional and accepted diplomatic standards, so was Trump’s call to Ukraine’s president. Everything they do is rooted in fraud and fraud is the Moonshine specialty.

The net effect had the outgoing Obama administration advising and properly situating the incoming Trump administration such that it would be prepared for any such “outbreak.” As it came to be, the would be “outbreak” was the very same one they researched, developed and formulated for years and then conspired with China to deliver. That’s not open for debate, either, unless someone has evidence to contradict what I’ve outlined in hundreds of sourced and cited articles, videos and graphics.

Comprehensively, it’s imperative to understand this following single data point which drives it all home for us.

Presidential transition law is rooted in Kennedy era legislation so as to facilitate an exact process ensuring a smooth and effective transition from the outgoing administration to the incoming one. In order to be positioned to specifically discuss pandemic preparedness in presidential transition meetings, then President Barack Obama had to issue executive order Public Law 114-136 to augment and change the existing transition law to specifically include pandemic preparedness, which he did on 18 Mar 16. I reviewed this extensively in Inconveniently Changing Dangerous Rules, an article latched onto and re-posted by Lin Wood and federal U.S. whistleblower Dr. Jonathan McGreevey.

In these ways, the exclusive timeline overlay work done at Moonshine provides a linear and robustly explanatory depiction of what happened and sequentially so.

With a firm understanding of pretext and how it works, we have these two additional examples that bear down with full might relative to everything else I’ve outlined: 1) in 2017 and just before Trump was set to take office, Dr. Anthony Fauci predicted publicly that a viral pandemic outbreak would plague [pun intended] Trump’s administration and 2) on October 25, 2019, some two months and two days before the 27 Dec 19 [later revised backwards to 17 Nov 19] first public report of the outbreak in China, Joe Biden announced that the U.S. was not prepared to handle a pandemic. Both instances are evidenced in the timeline extracts above.

For anyone thinking these were by accident, I have some beautiful ocean front property in Kentucky I’d like to sell them and at a bargain price, too. I’m sure we’ll have a line of mask-wearing buyers a mile long.

This is how pretext works. It’s sinister, cunning and highly effective against the feeble American mind and its half-a-second attention span.

One final point before bringing this home and it’s this. I’ve outlined and evidenced copiously that since October 2019, the U.S. has been mired in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared third world war as commenced with an act of war by China – the release [figuratively or literally depending on ones position respective to what Dr. David E. Martin outlined relative to U.S. patent filings] of a bio-WMD [SARS-CoV-2] against the U.S. Therein is the notion that this war stands a chance of going hot and here, Syria, the South China Sea, Taiwan and other avenues bear down.

Relative to all this are two more things to understand. One is my December 2020 article written shortly after the stolen election in which I explained how and why the U.S. would pivot back to Russia as it’s “boogeyman” de jour. In recent decades, the U.S. has deployed many boogeymen to permit its justification to go and do as illegal by international standards and in violation of countless international laws: Osama bin Laden, ISIS, Al Queda, “terrorism,” Iran, Russia, etc. You know the list.

The other thing comes from the proxy president himself, Joe Biden. We take his words against the backdrop that in all likelihood, a significant number of the attacks he references were executed by rogue elements of the CIA and simply attributed to Russia for the reasons we’re outlining here.

It’s found in a recent story featured at Zero Hedge and authored by Dave DeCamp at AntiWar.com that is worthy of reading and tucking away in your back pocket. In it, Biden said this [emphasis mine],

You know, we’ve seen how cyber threats, including ransomware attacks, increasingly are able to cause damage and disruption to the real world. I think it’s more likely we’re going to end up — well, if we end up in a war, a real shooting war with a major power, it’s going to be as a consequence of a cyber breach of great consequence.

Joe Biden

Now ask yourself why it is that Biden is establishing this pretext?

Through logical deduction, we regard Biden’s statement as one issued at the behest of China and for reasons outlined in a bedrock of existing Moonshine work.

Through logical deduction, my contention is that if the war were to go hot, it would be a short and destructive one manifesting as kabuki theater or just for show. Therein, Biden would deliberately take a predetermined dive resulting in a U.S. loss and then, within the treaty process itself, a Chinese controlled UN and China herself would take the U.S. for good.

I have supported all of this with a thorough examination of Chinese doctrine including One Belt, One Road and war doctrine vis-a-vis Sun Tzu.

To put to rest any dismissive thoughts or stances attributing these notions to being less than reliable or otherwise unfounded conjecture, one should ask why it is that recently, the U.S. went out of its way to establish pretext advising that in all scenarios relative to a hot war with China over Taiwan, the U.S. loses. In every single war game simulated, the U.S. loses. In every single one.

Consider these older findings.

So then, when Joe Biden rears his head and makes good on previous pretext by offering new pretext to the same Russian end – and that Russian end situates the U.S. in a hot war over cyber crimes that it’s likely executing against itself and attributing to Russia – Moonshine will advise you to take it and tuck it in your back pocket for safe keeping because it will in all likelihood serve as a beneficial explanation of something likely to happen in the future.

Let’s hope and pray not.

The power of pretext to accomplish nefarious objectives is something to be understood, highly regarded and identified with an acquired skill set.

All eyes on Biden, cyber crimes, China and Russia and for good cause – because they gave us the pretext to focus our eyes precisely there.

The power of pretext.



COVID-19: Public Crisis or Opportunistic Marketing Campaign Part II, Martin on Stew Peters with Confirmations and Relevant Data Points

In a recent Moonshine article, we took an incredibly intricate, deep and highly complex dive into the fraudulent construct we call the COVID-19 pandemic and in it, we examined the testimony of Dr. David E. Martin of MCAM. Therein and respective to SARS-CoV-2, Dr. Martin provided a copious amount of evidence available in 4,000 U.S. patent filings that MCAM examined to produce analytical findings and whereby MCAM presented all of the findings and evidence to all of the requisite legal, judicial, legislative and otherwise appropriate parties and entities in April of 2020.

For fidelity’s sake, this is several months following the 27 Dec 19 [and later revised to 17 Nov 19] first reported outbreak respective to Martin’s general knowledge of all of this information dating back to 2002. The effort was resoundingly and completely met with crickets. Just like when Bill Barr, whose background I scoured and linked directly to the stolen election and China respective to his tenure at Kirkland & Ellis, met that stolen election with crickets and even issued letters ensuring it. There’s a sub-series of Moonshine articles detailing it all.

The U.S. patent filings draw the timeline back to 1999 recalling that one Moonshine position is the ascendance of George H.W. Bush to the presidency. See the 1999 timeline contiguously and in both directions as far back as World War II Nazi era Germany and to the present. That’s old work for us.

It was a massive article containing a pseudo-transcription of Martin’s statement as tethered to Moonshine positions and whereby relevance and confirmations were discussed. The project caught the attention of Mr. Lin Wood again and gratefully so.

The findings were extraordinary and they support longstanding and exclusive Moonshine positions on the table for over a year and a half. Today’s article provides a few briefer points to expand on the previous ones and where I’m omitting redundant content.

The video is 52:19 long and this will save you a bunch of time if you understand the last article.

In between these two articles is another and it leverages Martin’s work on top of the body of Moonshine work to unmask Anthony Fauci as the monster he is.

Here’s more from Dr. Martin courtesy of the Stew Peters Show and the video is linked for you at the bottom.

The Interview

What follows is a paraphrased transcription of Dr. Martin’s interview on the Stew Peters Show published 19 Jul 21. It is linked at the bottom. 

The paraphrased transcription is interlaced with Moonshine commentary and noted accordingly. It will also appear in […] brackets. As we move through the transcription, I’ll indicate the Moonshine positions accordingly and they serve to provide meaning and tiebacks.

To bring emphasis to Dr. Martin’s points, I’ll underscore them. 

All of the following information is sourced directly from Dr. David E. Martin of MCAM International Risk Management except where and how Moonshine content appears as noted above.

Supportive of a Moonshine insistence that we’re living through a ‘modern day holocaust,’ Martin opens confirming Stew Peters’ assertion that the fraudulent COVID construct is premeditated mass murder tying it to the language of applicable statures and treaties.

Contrary to mistaken popular belief, the mRNA “vaccines” aren’t new and they aren’t conventional vaccines but rather a computer simulated, synthetic, chimeric, computer generated code, that was uploaded by the Chinese in January, and given to Moderna to put into an injection.

As we know, the injection of this “pathogen stimulant” becomes the primer to trigger the body to begin the synthesis of spike proteins, which in turn and theoretically triggers an immune response. The immune response becomes the defense against SARS-CoV-2 infection; and it all ties back to early veterinary science specifically on canines.

Martin goes on to quote Peter Daszak as quoted in the previous article and with Moonshine having already given attention to him in several previous articles. The quote compels Martin to characterize Dasazk as a “mercenary of death.”

Moderna, Pfizer, NIAID/NIH, CDC, etc. are again enveloped by Martin as a perfect capture and match for Moonshine’s existing fraud construct diagrammed as the “criminal enterprise” relative to RICO statue.

As an example, Pfizer patented the first S-1 spike protein vaccine back in 1990.

By definition, the crimes rise to prosecution under section 802 of the Patriot Act relative to domestic terrorism [see the definition at 7:54 in the linked video.]

Fully supporting a long line of published thoughts on ‘institutional preservation’ included in the full Moonshine body of work relative to COVID and the politics enmeshing it, Martin describes the failure of the U.S. institutions writ large to serve and protect the American people in as much as they participate in the opposite; and beginning with the DOJ. It’s here Martin again states how he has provided all evidence of crimes to all of the necessary institutions; and circa April 2020.

It’s here that decades-long Chinese infiltration of U.S. institutions bears down.

After a longer recapitulation of the facts from the previous article, Martin confirms that the patent for SARS precedes SARS first known emergence and that makes it a creation of man. One of our own – Ralph Baric, Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, et al.

Importantly, Martin also revisits a possible required veer from an existing Moonshine position asserting a deliberate release whereas Martin says the virus has been in the public domain since we put it there and doesn’t require an “outbreak.” Moreover the pursuit of the leak origins as a newsworthy story is merely a deflection and distraction away from this very point; a wild goose chase, if you will.

This makes our broader Moonshine case that the pandemic is one entirely of fraudulent data.

Martin then delves into the “story” [fear porn] that Peter Daszak required [and so did Anthony Fauci] to get people to accept mandated vaccinations. In so doing, he visits a major premise in the previous article.

Here, Martin revisits the concept of changing the pathogen to deliver the story to scare folks instead of trying to convince them into vaccinations. From the last article, Fauci said it best at the end of the flu (and a lot of other Moonshine) videos, “It’s the fear of the unknown which causes the panic.”

Importantly and falling back on established and foundational timeline elements in Moonshine positions, Martin cites a Chinese produced article featured in the Lancet Report and further cited by the CDC. It shows evidence citing 41 “laboratory confirmed 2019 COVID infection[s]” in hospitalized patients on 02 Jan 20. How can the lab confirmations confirmations precede the supposed isolation of the virus that didn’t occur until the following week?

Critically, also remember that amongst a heap of other evidence, our timeline evidences the fact that “COVID” was never designated for the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak until 11 Feb 20. How can you call something before the something even exists?

As Martin like to say, you can’t have a thing without first having a thing. Copy?

As submitted by one our independent epidemiologists, Moonshine has even provided copies of spreadsheets evidencing exactly this fact. They pertain to the ordering of “COVID” supplies dating back to 2017. You know, a thing before a thing.

Delving into another foundational Moonshine position – the asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared third world war as I first identified and wrote about in early May 2020 and revisited more recently Martin diverges from objective dialogue underpinned entirely by empirical evidence to more subjective discourse and touches on a significant Moonshine concern that once again drags the Chinese boot licking Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley into question.

It’s this question. If by definition the vaccine can be deemed a bio-WMD and its being deployed during a war as described; and it has all of the known detrimental and permanent health effects, along with the certain but not yet known ones, what happens to your national defense capabilities when this vaccine/bio-WMD is mandated to be given to the entire rank and file?

Chinese doctrine – win the war without ever having to fight it [in conventional terms.]

A toxic gene sequence uploaded into the vaccine and administered to the entire U.S. military by mandate accomplishes this effectively. As for the armed U.S. militia and constitutionally defined and as outlined in the Second Amendment is us, then look no further than everywhere around you trying to force you to take it.

Chinese doctrine. Win the war without ever having to fight it.

Martin describes how moving forward dissemination of the truth and the changing of mind is the most formidable weapon in undoing it all. I’ve long agreed with that and feel welcome to share Moonshine work toward that end.

Laughing in our faces and with evidence everywhere, the criminal enterprise has caused a prognosis for the vaccinated to be quite dire; especially since the road ahead is an experimental one. Especially so, since the U.S. Patent Office rejected Fauci’s prior vaccine filings because they failed to meet the standards of a vaccine in the multiple definitions.

Importantly, Martin is reluctant to debate the actual contents of the mRNA injections because the full spectrum of contents can not be found, identified, accessed or otherwise.

Martin discusses the nature of humans not being encoded to produce spike proteins and that this self-replicating vaccine will in transmission accomplish this.

Another longstanding Moonshine factor often discussed and most certainly in play relative to the Capitol “insurrection” event is prosecutorial discretion. Martin uses it to explain the judicial stand-down in the face of volumes of produced evidence. How the DOJ-upward, et al. have stood idly by. Martin’s positions mirror’s Moonshine’s in that there is clear evidence of crimes committed under RICO but where prosecutioral discretion permits two-tier justice and whereby one of those tiers also lashes back at those it considers antithetical to its causes. Or in other words, us.

Touching on a backdrop Moonshine item – a sidebar conversation about Tucker Carlson being great while also being on a leash and as partly evidenced in a Hunter Biden email, controlled opposition – Martin says the same even down to Carlson’s normally late timing. He’s essentially just really good, contagious, provocative rah-rah-rah, controlled opposition. Martin even goes further into the “Uniparty” dynamics with Rand Paul respective to his questioning of Fauci as an impotent campaign tactic for reelection; not a measure to seek the truth.

The interview ends with Dr. Martin talking about being on the right side of history.

Moonshiners will be on the right side of that line and with a robust fact set to back it up.



Here’s the Dr. Martin interview on the Stew Peters Show.

Unmask the Monster and Never Acquiesce to Fear: Common Sense, Logical Deduction and Empirical Data All Tell the Same Fraudulent Story So Fear Not and Live On

Ever notice how the horror movie monster isn’t quite so horrific after he’s unmasked? It’s really as simple as that yet feeble-minded Americans can’t seem to arrive at this conclusion because their misinformed, dogmatic and partisan ways prevent independent and critical thinking that could deliver them to this destination.

Rather these elixir-slurping folks with intellectual shortcomings decide to remain inebriated on the propagandized Kool-Aid as dished-up by a cartel of criminals executing a world-wide fraudulent construct in violation of the RICO statute and as enmeshed entirely in a corrupt and criminal political system that’s been broken for decades.

After another round of substantially heavy, incredibly long and highly complex articles laden with intricate, complicated and technical language and data points, let’s take a step back to address something in the broader spectrum that Anthony Fauci stated himself back in the very beginning of it all; and it’s something that has plagued [pun intended] him for decades.

That something is Fauci’s inability to convince the U.S. population writ large to accept widespread vaccinations of the mandated sort. What if Fauci’s tactic simply shifted from trying to convince us to trying to scare us?

Look no further – that’s the answer and it’s entirely evidenced by empirical data; often of Fauci’s own creation.

The Monster

Fauci is a monster by all conventions and un-skewing his fraudulent data equates to removing his mask. Beneath that mask is a petty coward of petite stature and tiny hands who is incapable of throwing a ball; much less fending off any ordinary alpha male taking exception to his actions and wants.


I’m not a violent man nor do I condone violence but everything has a time and place. Five minutes alone with Fauci and he’d eat out of tube for the rest of his life and that’s assuming he survived. You understand, no? Eye for an eye. Biblical. At what point is the term ‘modern day holocaust’ applicable and how many times do I have to ask that particular question before people see the evil for what it is? Everything has a time and a place.

So these diminutive Napoleonic types that repeat all throughout history compensate for their inadequacies by enshrouding themselves with absolute tyranny and authority and they get after us in ways often times not obvious or perceived.

Un-masking Fauci by leveraging common sense and applying logical deduction to a fulsome understanding of empirical data permits one to see the monster’s real face and as always, it causes the fear to dissipate and entirely so. Therefore, embrace it, fear not, live on and freely so.

The pandemic is empirically and objectively demonstrable as constructed entirely by fraudulent data ergo the only thing to fear is the feebleness of one’s own mind. The entire pandemic only exits in the mind.

Therein and by embracing all of the work and evidence proffered [especially at Moonshine and exclusively so] it permits one to simply refuse to acquiesce it all and that’s exactly what Americans cut from the traditional cloth of individual ruggedness should do and are doing.

In our last article – another one endorsed by Mr. Lin Wood and very proudly so on Moonshine’s part – Dr. David E. Martin put it this way, “From 2016-2019 at every one of the NIAID’s Advisory Counsel board meetings, Fauci lamented that he couldn’t find a way to get people to accept the universal influenza vaccine, which was his favorite target [objective.]”

This single fact delivered the COVID-19 “pandemic” to our doorstep because the circumvention or resolution to Fauci’s problem was to simply change the pathogen from the flu to a creation of their own – SARS-CoV-2. Despite being identified as a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 isn’t novel [new] at all according to U.S. patent filings.

What does the pathogen change provide? Easy. Fear. It creates the mask for Fauci to don and use to scare us all into his ultimate and longstanding objective – mandated universal vaccinations. Un-mask him and the fear evaporates altogether.

Augmenting the existing body of Moonshine work are the U.S. patent filings and the stringent and rigid U.S. patent office. Therein, SARS, which has been in the public domain accordingly, is drawn back on a timeline of over two decades and entirely as a man-made, bioengineered and bioweaponized [gain of function] pathogen. Moonshine work covered this ad nauseam including the stalwarts of the University of North Carolina’s Ralph Baric, the NIAID’s Anthony Fauci and the National Institute of Health director Francis Collins being central to all of it. Tip of the iceberg.

Digressing and returning to our monster, this very short video that I made by compiling CDC data maps and animating them is about a minute long. It demonstrates the fraudulent pandemic succinctly because it visually represents the harvesting of co-morbidity data [primarily derived from flu/pneumo, diabetes, heart disease and obesity data sets] as the data driver for the fraudulent pandemic construct. Most importantly for our conversation today, it contains something that I’ve included in about all of my videos on the pandemic.

Hold on to the end of our very short video to hear Deborah Birx proclaim that the flu is gone followed by Fauci’s self-indicting proclamation. You’ll know it when you hear it because it’s unmistakable.

“It’s the fear of the unknown which causes the panic.” In other words, it’s the fear of a pathogen of Fauci’s own design that overcomes his decades-long problem of the U.S. population refusing to accept mass vaccination writ large. As stated, they didn’t change the objective; just the tactic moving from convincing us to scaring us. Remove the mask and there is no fear. We’re nearing full circle on this monster.

The Horror Story

How do recent headlines inform our positions on Fauci? With precision; that’s how. We’ll get to them after the horror story at hand.

If folks are paying attention to the emerging narrative – just ask the Capitol “insurrectionists” – they note that the noose is being further tightened around the necks of the deplorable, freedom loving, Trump voting, MAGA believing, no vaccine getting, America first crowd. We call them “us.”

In true Nazi form, the U.S. federal apparatus is being leveraged to persecute and prosecute the political enemies of a fraudulently installed communist and Marxist regime. History repeats for those who don’t learn it and this is especially so given that the U.S. State Department falsified dossiers post World War II to permit the worst of Nazi war criminals and scientists to illegally immigrate to the U.S. under false pretenses. Again, infiltration bears down as does the presidency of George H.W. Bush and the funding of the Nazis by Prescott Bush.

The criminal enterprise executing this fraudulent, politically enmeshed and, by means of the RICO statute, criminally constructed COVID “pandemic,” continues to propagandize the media with their twisted and forked snake tongues while blaming all of “us” for its own evils.

Duplicity rules the day and as previously stated, it’s the culmination of Sun Tzu and Chinese war doctrine overlaid with Word War II Nazi style propaganda and tactics that have the nation on the brink of collapse and defeat in what amounts to an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared third world war. I even branded this dynamic ‘Chinese Nazis’ in a previous article and as odd as it sounds, it’s accurate.

The labeling. The differentiation. The division. The hate. It matters not if it’s vaccines, masks and social distancing or rewriting history, removing statues, faking white privilege and claiming that black lives are more valuable than white ones – it’s all intentionally sown division as a war tactic by China and devised to fracture the U.S. populace; to divide us in half and forever.

Hint: those “vaccines” which aren’t vaccines at all because they fail to align with the clinical, legal and patent standards for the definition of a vaccine; and accordingly were originally rejected by the U.S. Patent Office; and which are only even available for widespread inoculation by a national emergency declaration the predicate for which I can obliterate using the CDC’s own data and now said patent work from Dr. Martin, function to genetically alter the recipient forever. FOREVER.

Read that as permanent division of Americans in America, let that marinate for a second and then reconsider exactly and precisely just how nefarious this all is.

We’re at war, people, and if you know anything about the Chinese relative to war, we’re in immense trouble if the status quo continues to progress unfettered as it has.

Forever is how you sow division effectively. Look around you. Look at the headlines.

The Headlines

As it stands, the division and hate is literally being injected into “us.” Moreover and in the brand of Sun Tzu and the application of Chinese doctrine to America as Moonshine has outlined and evidenced previously and copiously, this infiltrating Chinese effort manifests as getting Americans to split and fight against themselves [ideologically] without fighting at all [an actual hot war like in the first Civil War.]

This is why American feeble mindedness is a nail I both detest with my full might and which I routinely hammer. To win this war, one only has to defeat the opponent’s mind. When the opponent owns and controls BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY, that objective becomes a simple one relative to the feeble mind that is dependent upon all three – BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY – and incapable of independent and critical thinking. Look around you. Look at the headlines.

Short of going hot on U.S. soil and even if that did occur, the ONLY way to defeat the U.S. in a war is to ideologically fracture the people in half.

Enter a pathogen they created and unleashed on us.

Enter an evil and fake narrative of systemic racism they unleashed on us. One unleashed with a summer of burning, looting, rioting and murder and all four years after America’s first black president served two terms, the Civil Rights movement and all of the subsequent legislation, rights and progress and the balance of history to this end.

Both – the pathogen and systemic racism – are entirely Chinese war tactics constructed to leverage American feeble-mindedness as instituted by the American indoctrination system – public education – and wittingly reinforced by the Marxist state mouthpiece – legacy media. BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA and BIG MONEY.

In all, welcome to the asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared third world war that I began writing about in early May of 2020.

From here, let’s stroll through contemporaneous headlines to provide specific and exact evidence of our claims and headline are all we’ll need. Given what’s already outlined, you’ll need no further explanation. The links are provided if you care to go deeper with any of them.

“It’s Time to Start Blaming Unvaccinated Folks – Not the Regular Folks” – Alabama GOP Governor Dehumanizes Unvaccinated People (VIDEO)

Watch: Fauci, CNN, White House, Newsom, & Cuomo All Ratchet Up Attacks On Unvaccinated Americans

Dem Senator Schumer Attacks Trump Supporters: ‘How Could 74 Million People Vote For a Despicable, Racist, Vile Man?’ (VIDEO)

CA Governor Gavin Newsom Compares Unvaccinated People to Murderous Drunk Drivers (VIDEO)

California & NYC Require All Public Workers To Get Vaccinated Or Submit To Weekly Tests

Megalomaniac Dr. Fauci Argues Unvaccinated People Are Going to Cause the Virus to Mutate into Deadly New Variant

“We Can’t Rely on the Honor System” – Doctor on CNN Demands Mask Mandates Nationwide Regardless of Vaccination Status (VIDEO)

Here We Go: CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Warns of “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” (VIDEO)

JUST IN: Los Angeles County Reimposes Indoor Mask Mandate Regardless of Vaccination Status

CDC Reverses Guidance, Will Mandate Wearing Of Masks Indoors

Bay Area Health Officials Strongly Urge Everyone to Wear Masks Indoors Regardless of Vaccination Status

‘Proof of a Negative Covid Test Will No Longer Be Enough’ – UK PM Boris Johnson Says Proof of Full Vaccination will be Required to Enter Nightclubs (VIDEO)

Regime Says Free Speech Is Killing People: Biden Surgeon General Holds Press Conference – Labels ‘Disinformation’ a National Health Threat (VIDEO)

Chicago Mayor Again Defends Speaking to Only Minority Reporters, Throws Shade at ‘White Guys’

Psaki Says US Going in the Wrong Direction Because of “Large Population of Unvaccinated People” (VIDEO)

Fake pandemics. Fake pathogens. Fake racism.

Real hate. Real division. Real feeble mindedness. Real war.

Fear not the fake anything and live on – it’s all fraud as war tactics and it’s all subject to defeat with independent and critical thinking.

Unmask the monster to see how “un-scary” it actually is; and rest comfortably knowing that you did so with common sense, logical deduction and empirical data.



When Pink Pigs Fly – Wood and Peters Respond to McGreevey Attacks As Moonshine Learns a Lesson

Recently, Mr. Lin Wood has latched on to our work here at Moonshine. Therein, I took the time to map-out the testimony he took from U.S. federal whistleblower Dr. Jonathan McGreevey and then followed that up with other articles; one calling for the presentation of rudimentary evidence in support of McGreevey’s claims. Today’s article examines an interview of Wood on the Stew Peters show and whereby Peters had also interviewed McGreevey but subsequently taken down the video due to significant attacks on McGreevey eroding at what Moonshine was working to preserve – his credibility as a witness.

Peters’ piece is incidentally now back up and here we are with this newer Wood interview in follow-up.

This interview is substantial in that it is responsive to our request for evidence on McGreevey’s claims at the same time it affords a lesson to be learned; and one that was learned.

Here are the diagrams featured in a recent article that map McGreevey’s testimony obtained by Wood assuming you’re unfamiliar with it.

Peters begins the segment confirming what happens behind the scenes with a lot of the interconnected folks working on the matters at hand, which is private communications. We have them constantly.

Therein, Peters outlines the type of attacks that he, Mr. Wood and Dr. Jonathan McGreevey, the U.S. federal whistleblower whose testimony to Mr. Wood I mapped out in detail so as provide utilitarian graphics that permit one to easily make and visualize connections and nexuses in this otherwise sordid, complex and inherently messy coup.

In confirmation of McGreevey’s credibility pertaining to his biographical details and the testimony he provided to him, Wood revisits how it centers on Chief Justice John Roberts, then Vice President Mike Pence and then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Recall that McGreevey’s statement has him going to work for Rosenstein directly in 2008.

Importantly and relative to very specific comments I’ve made about the veracity of McGreevey’s statement and my call for Wood and McGreevey to put cards down on the table [provide evidence], Wood confirms that the purpose of obtaining the statement was to draw scrutiny to it on the part of both legacy media and law enforcement; and for the express purpose of tasking them with investigating, vetting and determining whether McGreevey’s statements are accurate.

Here’s what I said previously about McGreevey’s testimony in light of my past professional experience serving attorneys as an investigator. It now stands in contradiction regarding how Wood handled McGreevey in what I refer to as front end due diligence.


Subsequently, I wrote an additional article outlining how Larry Johnson of The Gateway Pundit had drawn McGreevey and Wood into conflict. Therein, I called for the presentation of rudimentary evidence to support McGreevey’s background claim.

Relative to this and without further comment, Mr. Wood now states, “If it’s not true then it’s an accusation unfounded; we move on.”

Wood goes on to elaborate on concerns we’ve held close to our vest and situated appropriately as being addressed during customary front-end due diligence and it’s that McGreevey may be an asset or operator working to “set-up” Wood by providing misinformation/disinformation.

In a quick sidebar relative to this concept, one way to kill a truthful message is to take that message and the evidence behind it and then blend it with misinformation and disinformation. Further, it is then delivered by someone who has a known and demonstrably seedy background. Enter Dr. Jonathan McGreevey BUT ONLY IF YOU BELIEVE GATEWAY PUNDIT.

Importantly and to the finer point, the shift then goes from attacking the mixed-bag of evidence, which contains the truth as obfuscated by misinformation and disinformation, to attacking the one who delivered it. When you proverbially kill this messenger, you also effectively kill the message and therein the truth dies, too. This is the plausible explanation for the McGreevey attacks as understood at Moonshine and further explained by Wood.

This is the exact scenario that we have discussed behind the scenes at Moonshine and most recently yesterday; and it’s an exact fit for what Wood is outlining here.

The remaining questions and the ones to which we all want the answers remain unanswered – is McGreevey [and his testimony] credible, did Wood conduct any front-end due diligence, does evidence exist to this end and when can we see it if it does?

To-date and as discussed, I continue to hang my hat on Mr. Wood’s peg out of respect for his position as the nation’s preeminent defamation attorney and by means of the human element fostered by “my guy” who is in regular contact with Wood concerning the broader landscape here.

Digressing and back to the interview, Wood outlines how an individual[s] perhaps operating for the Deep State, pushed back against McGreevey as is so often the case when one is situated squarely above a sensitive target.

Wood discusses how the potential asset stated that McGreevey would try to set him up; that he would leverage his testimony for profit; and that he would withhold details out of secrecy concerns; all of which never happened.

In typical and telling fashion, the subsequent attacks on Wood, Peters, McGreevey, et al. ramped up exponentially at this point.

Wood then speaks directly to what I outlined in my previous article and he characterized it as “someone” trying to define for him how to vet and verify McGreevey’s credibility by examining basic evidence McGreevey should be able to present – transcripts, grade cards, student IDs, diplomas, etc. Here’s how I put it in the previous article,

So, if you’re thinking that the onus now shifts to Mr. Lin Wood and his team of attorneys to address concerns about McGreevey and the veracity behind his claims and assertions, I couldn’t agree more. 

It’s one thing for an individual claiming to be an internal federal whistleblower to come forward and provide his information to the public. It’s an entirely different thing for the nation’s preeminent defamation attorney and his team of attorneys to come forward and present that information to the public as presumably vetted and reliable as it should be.

If McGreevey’s statement and information aren’t vetted and reliable, then why was it put forward by Mr. Wood in consideration of what I stated about defamation attorneys? 

If McGreevey’s information isn’t vetted and reliable, that would make Wood a grifter; a snake oil salesman; an individual with an axe to grind; an individual with an ulterior agenda; and likely an individual with a principal. I’m here to say that I don’t believe any such characterization of Mr. Wood is in any way accurate or reflective of the truthTherefore, Mr. Wood’s position on Dr. McGreevey fully informs our position on Dr. McGreevey.

In other words and as it relates to Dr. McGreevey, I’m entirely hanging my hat on Mr. Wood and his sterling record as a defamation attorney and I do that because and as I stated, I worked for attorneys for years and I understand how they operate because I functioned within their sphere and doing their bidding. Moreover and as previously written with regard to frond-end validation of clients, “Defamation attorneys (or any others worth their salt) that don’t do it this way aren’t defamation litigators for long and if they are, they’re likely hungry, cash poor and thinking about getting into teaching.”


Further and from the same source, I put it this way.

“I even had someone say you need to go out and check his degrees and see if he went to these various schools,” Wood states.

Well, that’s obviously exactly what I outlined and moreover, I know that Mr. Wood saw this piece because it was sent directly to him. Notably and despite being on a hot streak with Mr. Wood sipping on Moonshine, he did not re-post that article like the others.

I’ll also point out that I never have expectations for anyone to re-post Moonshine work and that includes Mr. Wood. Rather, I simply remain eternally grateful when they do.

If Mr. Wood is referencing Moonshine work by his statement – and I have no confirmation that he is – I still care to go on record by saying that it was not my intention to advise the nation’s foremost litigator of lies on how to parse-out lies. Knowing one’s place is critical. I know mine.

Rather my intention was working to preserve Wood’s and Dr. McGreevey’s credibility BEFORE IT REACHES A POINT OF DIMINISHING RETURNS and can’t be preserved due to the attacks for which there was never any response to quash them; at least until this responsive interview.

The easiest and most efficient way to do that – preserve credibility – would be to produce evidence of the nature I described. This is especially so since The Gateway Pundit and Larry Johnson are driving this damaging narrative.

The established rules of the game require that claims be evidenced. Herein, Moonshine is playing by the rules in pursuit of the TRUTH and for the express purpose of aiding and preserving McGreevey’s and Wood’s credibility and veracity. No more. No less.

In my past investigative work for attorneys, I did their bidding but I never advised them on how to formulate that bidding.

Again, know thy place. That has never held truer than it does here.

Mr. Wood continued to say, “So they want to define for me how to show that he’s credible.”

As for the Moonshine position on this, that’s simply not the case at all but rather and as stated, it’s a reasonable and obvious suggestion within the rules of the game to mitigate the attacks Wood references; and while preserving his own credibility and that of Dr. McGreevey.

Whether Mr. Wood’s comments are directly responsive to mine [my gut tells me they may be because I was informed that the article was sent directly to him] or not, obviously, a chord has been struck.

It matters not and for our purposes here, I’m simple pleased that Mr. Wood is addressing the McGreevey testimony accordingly. Ultimately, it should lend towards a better understanding and a greater sense of veracity.

To prove my point about working to preserve Wood’s credibility, I even went as far as to outline specifically what detractors would say about him respective to McGreevey. Consider this recent exchange including a reply from the extract above. Note the use of the word “grifter” because that’s the prediction I made that came to fruition as you’ll see and beginning with the harmless original post featuring a recommendation to take in a Garret Ziegler interview.

It doen’t take a prognosticating genius to know that without some provision of evidence supportive of McGreevey’s position that “grifter” would be applied to Mr. Wood. I called for the evidence to prevent exactly this; not to tell Mr. Wood how to do his job.

I sure hope my pursuit of the TRUTH, evidence of the TRUTH and the efforts to preserve Wood’s and McGreevey’s credibility weren’t conflated with attacks or intrusion on Mr. Wood’s professional duties.

Specifically to McGreevey’s credibility, Wood succinctly states, “I made the determination.”

Drawing a comparison to the Las Vegas mass shooter Stephen Paddock, whose records were wiped clean, Wood accurately describes how the Deep State does this as they did it to McGreevey. This is where the reporting from The Gateway Pundit encounters problems and falls short – they fail to acknowledge this reality.

Directly speaking to what I outlined above with regards to killing the message by killing the messenger, Wood outlines how Peters, himself and McGreevey have all been grossly attacked yet none of the attackers have taken issue with the message [testimony] or its contents. This is telling; very telling.

Wood advises that the Wall Street Journal, the U.S. Secret Service, the Georgia and Arizona Bar Associations and anyone else asking for it have received McGreevey’s testimony. As expected, they’ve done nothing with it thus far.

Peters delves into the same without further drilling down on the front-end due diligence process by which Wood vetted and established the veracity and credibility for McGreevey by saying that he independently and outside of Wood spoke to “other sources” where trust is already in place and “the one thing they said is, ‘I deem him [McGreevey] to be credible.’”

In light of Moonshine’s ultimate objective – full disclosure – Peters reinforces a Wood position that perhaps Moonshine [I] needs to better learn and or embrace – that it’s NOT our job to determine whether McGreevey’s testimony is truthful but rather to determine whether or not he’s credible. Therein Peters references his “knee jerk reaction” [taking down the McGreevey video] and here, I’ll own mine [Moonshine’s] to the fullest.

Lesson learned Mr. Wood.

To the more significant issue, which is telling, Peters draws back down on why no one is investigating McGreevey’s claims.

In reply, Mr. Wood indicates that several other individuals joined him in concurring on McGreevey’ credibility; reflecting both on front-end due diligence as outlined and the notion of attacking the messenger over the message.

It’s a simple as saying, “When they start attacking the messenger, then people ought to pay attention to the message,” as Wood states.

Wood then turns the tables writ large by shifting the investigative onus to vetting McGreevey’s claims about Roberts and Pence.

Specific to Larry Johnson at The Gateway Pundit and including Brian Cates, who has been directly contacting Mr. Wood, Wood states that Johnson has been trying to move him off of McGreevey for some time.

Now it’s Moonshine’s turn. The Gateway Pundit has ignored my countless messages, emails and posts to TGP, Jim Hoft, et al. for about a year and a half. Why? My reporting has been accurate and light years ahead of what they have produced.

Perhaps Larry Johnson will read this call for him to pick-up his pen and defend himself against Mr. Wood’s accusations here; especially since Wood describes him as “too obsessed with it” and “coming in spurts.”

After all, what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

No matter, the TRUTH should win-out here.

Notably, Wood cites Johnson’s known previous work for the CIA and whereby Johnson’s claims it to be of the past.

Speaking directly about Cates, Wood advises that he’s never spoken to Cates but that Cates had messaged him as described and “almost like they’re working together” to push Wood toward verifying McGreevey’s credibility.

Wood cites as suspect the unity and timing of Johnson and Cates coming together in this way.

Further and delving into a concept we monitor closely, Wood speaks of channels/people on Telegram [and perhaps elsewhere] that present as patriotic but now appear to be sowing division amongst the ranks. I wrote specifically about this concept in a recent article.

Wood then expands on the how the Deep State infiltrates movements and turns the movement on the truth-tellers with the mode of “attack the messenger,” as outlined. As we know, they’ve been doing this for “decades.”

Mr. Wood then cites the precise reason Moonshine has and will continue to hang its hat on his peg – his “life’s body of work” and the pro bono aspect of it relative to Mr. Trump and all of our current societal and political ills.

Peters and Wood then dovetail into a dialogue about the election theft and politicians in his former state of residence, Georgia; the good things that are happening by God’s grace despite efforts by evil to rule and control us all with evil; and comments about the identity and reliability of Q. It can be consumed independently.

As for our hat hanging on Wood’s peg and the background and testimony of Dr. Jonathan McGreevey, the hat’s still hanging and resolutely sole while the pink pigs flies.

What makes this flying pink pig different from all the others, though, is its capacity to deliver a lethal payload of the biggest bombs available and so it is the messenger who is attacked while the message goes without scrutiny.

Fly pink pig, fly. Bombs away, sir. Drop them all and let God sort it all out.

Here is the full interview.


COVID-19: Public Crisis or Opportunistic Marketing Campaign – The Most Important Article To-date

The introduction to this article was posted last night on social media and the words are not an exaggeration – this is arguably the most important article I’ve written to-date respective to the fraudulent COVID-19 pandemic. I would encourage you to do two things – read this article in full and then watch the interview when you have more time. I’m saving you probably about an hour here and the transcription is paraphrased – more on that momentarily – and it’s entirely thorough. It stands as pseudo-transcription because for most of it I capture full direct or near full direct quotes; but for the purpose of keeping the information flowing for the reader’s sake, paraphrasing and formatting were required in what will end-up being about 12-14 hour project.

Dr. Martin’s testimony made it to me by means of a thoughtful reader who kindly sent it a few weeks ago – @Sanity2016 on Gab – and “my guy,” who also sent it along as likely sourced from Lin Wood’s Telegram feed.

This is David E. Martin, PhD and his company founded in 1998 is called MCAM International Risk Management. You’ll learn more about Dr. Martin and MCAM from Martin’ testimony. I will spend more time subsequent to this piece learning more about MCAM and Martin.

I’m hanging my hat on Dr. Martin for now because of the nature of his work and the preceding reputation of his outfit as it’s presented. Therein, his entire fact set can be evidenced by U.S. patents and patent law. Much like genetic evidence, this makes the evidence entirely reliable to the most robust evidentiary standard suitable for a court of law. From his fact set, we draw-down on monumentally important positions and confirmations of them.

I’m also hanging my hat on Dr. Martin because I established in the FIRST SECOND FOURTH FIFTH and SEVENTH articles [and others] of this massive series that patents and patent sharing agreements were foundational elements to the fraudulent COVID construct I’ve mapped-out in ways unparalleled in thoroughness, exclusivity and uniqueness.

In short, patents is where I started in all of this – being what set the original investigative vectors from which countless others emerged – so getting the confirmations in the same exact context is invaluable and brings us full-circle. The evidence of patents also arrives backed by the stringent nature of U.S. Patent Office and it presents in the public record for access to anyone.

Dr. Martin’s inherent value to the full body of Moonshine work is that it’s wholesale level confirmation of critical and fundamental positions across the board and by bridging Moonshine positions to tangible evidence – patent filings.

A Word of Caution Moving Forward

The nature of this matter is highly complex and it makes for very technical reading in addition to the complexity that is the fraudulent COVID construct itself. Moreover, it’s long – really long. It was a long interview.

It won’t be for everyone but yet again, that’s what makes this pandemic construct so effective. A recommendation is to perhaps read it more than once if things still remain unclear and the video doesn’t help.

This is also for the informed reader; especially for veteran Moonshiners because this article is not the place to recapitulate the entire backdrop or even part of it. We have to hit the ground running here.

On the Moonshine site alone, there are hundreds of articles, videos and graphics to underpin and explain all of this excruciating detail.

If this is your first sip of Moonshine, I’m hoping it won’t be your last and at a minimum, I recommend consuming these more recent and recapitulating articles while jumping off this cliff with Dr. Martin: ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIX SEVEN EIGHT NINE TEN ELEVEN TWELVE THIRTEEN FOURTEEN FIFTEEN SIXTEEN SEVENTEEN EIGHTEEN NINETEEN. They’re listed chronologically and should be consumed with the first five linked above.

Like I said, this is better suited for the informed reader in addition to being highly technical, complex and long.

Here we go.

Confirmations From Dr. David Martin, PhD

What follows is a paraphrased transcription of Dr. Martin’s interview with Reiner Fuellmich on 09 Jul 21. It is linked at the bottom.

The paraphrased transcription is interlaced with Moonshine commentary and noted accordingly. It will also appear in […] brackets. As we move through the transcription, I’ll indicate the Moonshine positions accordingly and they serve to provide meaning and tiebacks.

To bring emphasis to Dr. Martin’s points, I’ll underscore them.

All of the following information is sourced directly from Dr. David E. Martin of MCAM International Risk Management except where and how Moonshine content appears as noted above.

From a corporate standpoint and since 1998, MCAM has been the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets [things you can’t physically possess or touch like DNA genome sequencing, etc. – think intellectual property] used in finance in 168 countries; the majority of countries around the world.

MCAM’s underwriting systems include the entire corpus of all patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, e-government records, etc.

Again, this is full circle for Moonshine work because 100% of our investigative vectors opened through the simple question of cui bono relative to Remdisivir, a Gilead Sciences drug identified as the first effective treatment of SARS-CoV-2. I simply cared to know more about whom stood to benefit from the treatment of this curiously timed outbreak as compounded by my initial suspicions and as almost laughably so as occurring between Christmas and New Years, when most of the Western World was recovering from one holiday in preparation for the next. I latched on immediately, have been working it since and it all began with patents.

MCAM has the ability to track what is happening and who is involved in what’s happening; and MCAM monitors a series of thematic interests for a variety of organizations, individuals and for MCAM’s own commercial use relative to three maintained global indices which are the top performing large cap and mid-cap equity indexes worldwide.

Recall that Moonshine work is heavily laden with private equity vectors and the evidence related to them. Specifically we have zeroed in on BlackRock and Vanguard Group and further, Moonshine traces overlaps of the DOJ, law firms and private equity all through the nebulous stolen election and more.

MCAM’s business is to monitor the innovation that’s happening around the world and specifically to monitor the economics of that innovation; and to the degree to which financial interests are being served, corporate interests are being dislocated, etc.

MCAM’s business is the business of innovation and its finance.

MCAM has reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around the SARS-CoV-2 virus doing a very comprehensive review of the financing of all the manipulations of coronavirus, which gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus family.

In a critical document publicly available since spring 2020, MCAM took the actual reported gene sequence, which was reportedly isolated as a novel coronavirus indicated as such by the ICTV [International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses of the WHO] and reviewed the information against the patent records that were available as of spring 2020 finding over 120 patented pieces of evidence suggesting that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy.

This is a slight departure from Moonshine positioning given that we have established an actual release of a bio-WMD in an act of war relative to the outbreak of a novel coronavirus. No meaning is lost; however, as Dr. Martin will go on to explain why an actual outbreak was never even required – it’s as ordinary as programming a computer – and it bears down hard on other fundamental, pillar Moonshine positions; especially those for the PCR test respective to deliberately high cycle thresholds and this dynamic serving as the primary data driver [infection and mortality data harvested from co-morbidities (flu/pnumo, diabetes, heart disease and obesity)] for the fraudulent COVID construct.]

There was no novel coronavirus; there are countless very subtle modifications of coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded. There was no single identified novel coronavirus at all.

Understand what Martin is saying because it’s the same thing I’ve been reminding of – they never isolated the SARS-CoV-2 gene sequence relative to the PCR test and therefore a wide spectrum of pathogens would trigger false positives and this is in addition to the faulty cycle thresholds, which do the exact same thing – produce false positives in abundance. They deliver needed data in spades. They drive the pandemic of fraudulent data.

MCAM found records within the patent records of gene sequences attributed to novelty that were going to patents that were sought as early as 1999.

Martin is extending our timeline back to 1999 – there’s nothing new or novel about SARS-CoV-2 or the reality of this fraudulent pandemic.

Not only was this not a novel anything, it’s actually not been novel for over two decades.

Up until 1999, the topic of coronavirus vis-a-vis the patenting activity around coronavirus was uniquely applied to veterinary sciences.

The first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus was actually sought by Pfizer. The application for the first coronavirus vaccine was specifically for the S-spike protein, which is the exact same thing for which we have allegedly rushed into invention.

The first application was filed 28 Jan 00; 21 years ago. Therefore, the idea that we mysteriously stumbled upon the way to intervene with vaccines is not only ludicrous but it’s incredulous.

Timothy Miller, Sharon Klatfer, Albert Paul Reid and Elaine Jones on 28 Jan 00 filed what ultimately was issued as U.S. patent 6372224, which was the spike protein virus vaccine for the canine coronavirus, which is one of the multiple forms of coronavirus.

The early work up until 1999 was largely focused in the area of vaccines for animals whereby Ralph Baric’s work with rabbits at the University of North Carolina and the rabbit cardio myopathy that is associated with significant problems among rabbit breeders, and canine coronavirus in Pfizer’s work, to identify how to develop S-protein spike target candidates giving rise to the obvious evidence that says that neither the coronavirus concept of a vaccine nor the principle of the coronavirus itself as a pathogen of interest with with respect to the spike protein’s behavior is anything novel at all. As a matter of fact, it’s 22 years old based upon patent files.

Moonshine work has covered Baric’s and UNC’s involvement extensively and through filed patents we have unequivocal evidence of forethought for a fraudulent pandemic with Baric and Fauci in partnership as you’ll see next and as linking back to his previously established and controversial HIV work and which also envelops a whole host of others we’ve also identified.

More problematic and egregious is that Anthony Fauci and the NIAD found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines. Therefore, SARS is actually not a natural progression of a zoonotic modification of coronavirus.

Rather and very specifically, in 1999 as per a patent application filed 19 Apr 02, Anthony Fauci funded research at UNC Chapel Hill (Ralph Baric) specifically to create “an infectious replication defective coronavirus that was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.” In other words, we made SARS and we patented in on 19 Apr 02 before any alleged Asian outbreak, which followed several months later.

That patent was issued as U.S. patent 7279327 and clearly lays-out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew that the Ace-2 receptor, the Ace-2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein and other elements associated with SARS were not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen.

Every bit of what Fauci, et al and the legacy media has told us about these components as if they were “news” or novel, represents the witting commission of fraud under RICO. All of the information was decades old and known.

This is old from spring of 2020.

That technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.

MCAM was asked to monitor biological and chemical weapons treaty violations in the very early days of 2000 remembering the September 2001 anthrax events serving as part of an investigation that gave rise to the congressional inquiry into the anthrax origins and unusual activity around a potential anthrax drug treatment by Bayer; and throughout the fall of 2001, MCAM began to monitor an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were being patented through NIH, NIAID, U.S. AMRID [military] and a number of other collaborating international agencies.

MCAM’s concern was not only coronavirus being seen as a manipulable agent for potential use as a vaccine vector but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate.

MCAM’s first report of this occurred prior to the SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001.

Importantly, remember that coronavirus is a circulating pathogen inside of the established viral model with a sequence of proteins that have circulated for a very long time; it is not new to the human condition or the last two decades; and after the alleged SARS outbreak in China in 2002-2003, it gave rise to a very problematic April 2003 filing by the U.S. CDC.

In addition to filing the entire gene sequence for what became the SARS coronavirus, which is a violation of U.S. Code 35-101, you can not patent a naturally occurring substance; meaning that if a patent is filed and the substance isn’t natural ergo it was man-made ergo it was bioengineered or bioweaponized, it will be disqualified.

The U.S. Code 35-101 violation was U.S. patent 7220852, which also had a series of derivative patents associated with it and these are patent applications that were broken apart because they were of multiple patentable subject matter.

These patents include U.S. patent 46592703p [this is the CDC provisional patent filing and there is not a valid record under this patent number with the U.S. government; however, it was found cited in other articles] and 776521, which covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus and the means of detecting it using RTPCR.

This is problematic because if one owns for both the patent on the gene and for the detection of it there is a cunning advantage in controlling 100% of the providence of not only the virus itself but also its detection thus providing entire scientific and message control.

This is critical because it supports Moonshine positions that the constructed fraudulent pandemic contains redundant system controls that permit its facilitators to make the pandemic appear and disappear whenever and however desired.

This patent was sought by the CDC and was justified as enabling widespread research into coronavirus but this is an outright lie because the patent was twice rejected saying the virus was un-patentable because the gene sequence was already in the public domain.

Prior to the CDC’s patent filing, the U.S. Patent Office found 99.9% identity with the already existing coronavirus in the public domain. Then, over the rejection of the patent examiner and after paying an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC overrode the patent office’s rejection of their patent and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS coronavirus.

On the Moonshine timeline and as explained in Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules, one of several articles that caught the eye of Lin Wood, this CDC override is important because it abuts to Obama’s first term in January 2009 and the executive order that George W. Bush handed him relative to U.S. biocontainment systems and the resulting moratorium on gain of function research; and what we identify as the Monaco memo that mandated a biosecurity stand-down at U.S. biocontainment facilities. Moonshine posits that the stand-down permitted the off-shoring of GOF work to the WIV in Wuhan.

This translates to every CDC public statement made pertaining to this being in the public interest is falsifiable by its own paid “bribe” to the patent office. This is not something subtle and even worse, they paid an additional fee to keep their application private.

Critically important is that “fact-checkers” have said that the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is distinct from the CDC patent. In looking at the gene sequence contained in the CDC’s filings in 2003, 2005 and 2006, identity is found in the range of 89-99% in the gene sequence overlaps in what is called the novel subclade of SARS-CoV-2.

The core designation of SARS coronavirus, which is the clade of the beta coronavirus family, and the subclade of SARS-CoV-2 have to overlap from a taxominate point of view. Translated, this means you can’t have a SARS designation without it first being SARS.

This renders the “fact-checking” beyond the literal credibility of the published sequences and beyond credulity relative to the ICTV taxonomy because it clearly states that it is a subclade of the clade of SARS coronavirus.

On the problematic date of 28 Apr 03, 3 days after the CDC filed the patent on the SARS coronavirus, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, which was established in Maryland, filed a patent on antiviral agents in treatment and control of infections by coronavirus.

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals and ultimately Ablynx Pharmaceuticals became rolled into the proprietary holdings [private equity] of Pfizer, Crucell and Johnson & Johnson.

The obvious and logical question becomes how one could have a patent on both the disease and the treatment with only 3 days in between?

U.S. patent number 7151163 issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals has another problem, which is that it was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was actually allowed. This completely and fully precludes anyone outside of the patent holders from accessing the information remembering that the CDC had paid to keep its information private in addition to standing completely antithetical to its state purpose for filing the patent.

It is impossible to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published because the CDC had paid to keep it secret.

This is the precise definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion – violations under the RICO statute – and it’s not theoretical but established with demonstrable and irrefutable evidence. It’s unequivocally FRAUD as I’ve been stating and evidencing beginning immediately after the COVID-19 was first publicly identified on 27 Dec 19 [an unparalleled catalog of hundreds and hundreds of articles, graphics and videos.]

RICO, criminal conspiracy and fraud is where we have hung the Moonshine hat with absolute fidelity.

Created January 2021

This draws down on our continued examination and application of compartmentalization within the bedrock of our COVID work. Compartmentalization is, of course, a hallmark indicator of fraud and it’s layered and identified all throughout our COVID construct work.

You can’t have information in the future inform a treatment for a thing that did not exist.

The RICO pattern was first established in April 2003 for the first coronavirus and was played-out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS-CoV-2 appear coinciding with Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID prior to the definition of the novel subclade [identifying a product of a virus not yet being identified.]

How do you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?

On 05 Jun 08 and as coinciding with DARPA’s active interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon, Ablynx – now a part of Sanofifiled a series of patents that specifically targeted what we’ve been told is the novel feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Specifically they targeted the polybasic cleavage site for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and Ace-2 receptor binding domain, which is allegedly novel to SARS-CoV-2 and all of that was patented on 05 Jun 08.

In sequence, those patents were issued between 24 Nov 15 and 2016, 2017 and 2019 [not in 2018]. In 2015, U.S. patent 9193780 came out after the gain of function moratorium referenced in Moonshine article Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules providing the impetus to off-shore the work to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. It also came-out after the MERS outbreak in the Middle East.

Subsequently in 2016, 2017 and 2019 we have a series of patents all covering the RNA strands and the subcomponents of the gene strands and they were all issued to Ablynx and Sanofi. Crucell, Rubius Therapeutics, Children’s Medical Corporation [information not identifiable] and countless others like Ludwig Maximillian University in Munich, Protein Science Corporation, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong, Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai all identifying in patent filings ranging from 2008-2017 every attribute that was allegedly uniquely published in the single reference publication for the novel bat coronavirus reveals natural insertions of the S-1, S-2 cleavage site of the spike protein and possible recombinant-3 origin the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

In the paper routinely used to identify the SARS-CoV-2, if you take what they assert to be novel, there are 73 patents issued between 2008-2019, which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS-CoV-2 and specifically as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, Ace-2 binding domain and the spike protein.

Again, this ties back to Moonshine’s critical timeline of Obama’s first term through the most important time span in contemporaneous American history – mid January 2017.

Remember, the outbreak was first reported publicly on 27 Dec 19 before later being backdated to 17 Nov 19.

The net effect is that there was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that and by 2016, the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium and written by Ralph Baric at UNC and said the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence and patented for commercial exploitation.

In 2015 [and reported 12 Feb16] in a statement made by Peter Daszak [Eco-Health Alliance], he said, “We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pancoronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.

Moonshine has covered Daszak and his importance in detail and those articles have been linked for you above. Additionally, this ties back to our Donald J. Trump identifiers – BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA & BIG MONEY.

Daszak was the independent corroborator of the Chinese non-lab leak theory [COVID narrative] understanding that there was no lab leak, but rather and as Moonshine reported in early May of 2020, it was an act of war by means of releasing a bio-WMD in the throes of an undeclared, irregular and asymmetrical third world war.

Specifically, it was an intentional weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pancoronavirus vaccine.

This bears down on another fraud indicator in how the construct will require vaccine recipients to receive lifetime boosters or something similar given the indicator of “addicted to.” That would seem to be the logical avenue. It’s reasonable to believe it was bio-engineered so as to detrimentally impact the recipient’s immune system efficacy without the boosters thus creating immune system dependency. The degree to which that could seriously and negatively impact ones health is significant.

This also bears down on old and now-deleted but archived tweets repeatedly asking if Fauci was nothing more than a snake-oil style vaccine salesman. It weaves through Moonshine reporting, too.

It all has nothing to do with an outbreak and all investigations into the lab-leak theory are nothing more than red herrings.

Again, Moonshine was on-point and first with COVID as a fraudulent political construct just as the act of war was identified back in early May 2020. Martins’ patent information delivers high-order confirmations here.

Proving that there was never a release of anything, U.S. patent 7279327 – the one on the recombinant nature of the lung-targeting coronavirus – was transferred mysteriously from Ralph Baric’s UNC to the NIH in 2018. The problem is that under the Bayh Dole Act the U.S. government already has what is called a ‘march in right provision’ meaning U.S. paid for research entitles them to benefit from the research a their demand [meaning the transfer wasn’t needed.] So then, why in 2017 and 2018 did the NIH suddenly have to take ownership of the patent to which it already had rights?

This is consistent with Moonshine positions on the bioweaponization of SARS-CoV-2 for nefarious purposes. Martin slants in a different direction as informed by the patent filings to which Moonshine is now becoming privy. This will require some adjustment to our positions as we have referenced other sources citing details of how the release was executed. The veracity of Martin’s testimony here may require these revisions. No matter because no meaning is lost from our broader positions but rather this represents a slight departure at most.

Moreover, why did they need to file a certificate of correction [due to a typo] to ensure it was all enforceable by law?

On the single patent required to develop the Vaccine Research Institute’s mandate, it was indicated that the patent was shared between UNC and Moderna, both in November 2019, and NIAID to begin the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine; occurring a month before the outbreak [27 Dec 19 as Moonshine has long reported.]

Dr. Martin then verifies his possession of all evidence in support of his fact sets.

The script [presumably but not specifically mentioned – context edited out] for the COVID pandemic was written by Merck in 06 Jan 04 at a conference called ‘SARS and Bioterrorism.

Event 201 as previously and routinely covered by Moonshine bears down here exactly as I described it then in colloquial terms – Event 201 was pre-game warm-up for COVID-19.

Moonshine dedicates much time talking about social programming and the degree of American idiocy that permits it since independent and critical thinking is rare these days. Therein, it was Merck that coined “the new normal,” which became the language of the branded COVID campaign as I’ve referenced copiously.

In March of 2019, Moderna was aware that relative to the development of the COVID vaccine, it was going to be queued up to the front of the line. Recall that the initial outbreak date, later revised to 17 Nov 19, was 27 Dec 19; some 9 months later.

One of two independent epidemiologists consulted by Moonshine has evidence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus stateside in October 2019 and that is our understanding of the actual outbreak timing as per the existing body of Moonshine work. Dr. Martin’s testimony slants the “outbreak” in an obviously new direction but in ways so as not to alter our fundamental positions at all. A slight veer, if you will as described above.

Also in March of 2019, a series of rejected patent filings were amended and described as a very bizarre behavior. The amended filings were such that a “deliberate release” of coronavirus be included in the filing.

There were 4 failed patent applications amended to begin the process of a coronavirus vaccine development program and they began dealing with a significant problem of relying upon technology they did not own.

Two Canadian companies – Arbutus Pharmaceuticals and Acuitas Pharmaceuticals actually own the patent on the lipid nanoparticle envelope that’s required to deliver the injection of the mRNA fragment.

The respective patents have been issued in Canada, in the U.S. and around the world and in their world intellectual property equivalents.

Again, Moonshine’s initial investigative vectors on vaccine patent and patent-sharing agreements bear down with full might here.

Moderna knew it didn’t own the rights and entered negotiations with Abbutus and Acuitas to resolve the patent issues and permit the technology to be put into a vaccine.

From 2016-2019 at every one of the NIAID’s Advisory Counsel board meetings, Fauci lamented that he couldn’t find a way to get people to accept the universal influenza vaccine, which was his favorite target [objective.]

Circling back to bear down here are the amended patent filings above that were augmented to include a deliberate [“accidental”] release as the circumvention of Fauci’s problem – a public reluctant to embrace mass vaccination. Fauci’s quote, “It’s the fear of the unknown which causes the panic” is emblematic of how the circumvention will be “fear porn” disseminated by a complicit and witting legacy media. Look and listen around you.

Making that problematic is that the amended filing contained direct language from the book ‘A World at Risk,’ which was the scenario put together by the [Chinese controlled] WHO in September 2019; months before 27 Dec 19. It called for a global coordinated experience of a respiratory pathogen release, which by September 2020 must put in place as a universal capacity for public relations management, crowd control and the acceptance of a universal vaccine mandate.

Dr. Martin confirms that for the Ace-2 receptor targeting mechanism for SARS-CoV-2, there are 117 preexisting patents.

It’s pointed out that back in 2008 and by declaration, the WHO stated coronavirus had been eradicated so why is there now a mandate to expand vaccine development? Moonshine work would support the notion of this being cover – call it eradicated and folks will lose focus and move on while you continue to work on it in the backdrop; even off-shoring it to China’s WIV.

Coronavirus was a highly malleable bioweapon and by 2005, the preferred one. There is no vaccination for a virus but rather an injection of a spike protein mRNA sequence, which is an artificial computer simulation that’s not derived from nature of a sequence known and patented since for years.

Evidence demonstrates that none of the research is targeting the virus, but rather the vaccine meaning the objective is getting the people to accept widespread [vaccination] injection of the known-to-be dangerous S-1 spike protein.

When the patent office rejected Fauci’s own synthetic mRNA vaccines published in patent filings, the Patent Office stated, “These arguments… is [are] not persuasive with regards to a vaccine.”

The take away is that Fauci’s mRNA vaccines didn’t meet the patent, legal or clinical standard for what a vaccine is.

Dr. Martin reminds us that he first raised these issues back in 2002 in the aftermath of the anthrax scare.

During Q&A and respective to a question about the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, Martin confirms that there are 40,000 or more coronavirus strains on record. Moreover, the Alpha, Beta, etc. variant names are fictitious creations serving the purpose that Moonshine outlined long ago – they are coercive levers existing in the context of the broader construct to leverage people; or “fear porn.

There is no clinical evidence anywhere indicating that the Delta variant is in any way uniquely distinct from anything else – there is no novel anything.

Again, this is entirely evidencing broad and fundamental Moonshine positions respective to the mid-April shift and the role of the variant as levers within the redundant systems of control contained in the fraudulent construct.

In the amended Ralph Baric filing, the SAR-CoV-2 virus is indicated as an artificial sequence with no rule base in nature. Every one is a synthetic artificial sequence and moreover, the sequences are contiguous and overlap and the fragmentary examination of the sequences as capriciously determined. Summarily, Martin tells us there is no exact known gene sequence for SARS-CoV-2 and that finding it has been elusive [unattainable.] Respective to the patent filings, the full sequence is never provided – just fragments of it – and moreover, where and how you examine the fragments allows the examiner to steer the findings.

Martin touches on something no one talks about but Moonshine and that’s the predication for the national emergency declaration. Why? Because I can undo it with the CDC’s own data. Undo that and you undo all of COVID – the whole fraudulent pandemic disintegrates.

There would be no legal impetus behind issuing guidelines, mitigations, the enforcement of them and for the authorization of mRNA “vaccines” or anything else. The entire house of cards comes tumbling down. Been screaming it for a year and half.

Martin says that there is no single standard for the gene sequence relative to the predication meaning as he and I have both said, the more you look for something the more you find it [look back up at the first graphic atop the column of images above this paragraph] because there is no single sequence fragment to be found. I normally state this as the virus having never been isolated relative to PCR testing.

In short and because of the fragmentary examination of the contiguous and overlapping gene sequences, where you decide to start and stop examining the fragments works to provide the examiner the capacity to decide what he finds. In other words, look where you want and make it what you want. Like making a fake pandemic.

Moreover and as I’ve outlined times and times over, the PCR test bears down with full might to deliver the pandemic construct data driver – the newly minted “new cases” that replaced the conventional standard of mortality data that was in decline when the shift was made mid-April 2020 and as diagrammed above.

These below are very old and they’ve aged like fine wine.

Dr. Martin references the now disappeared influenza [see the short video below and hold on to the end to hear the Fauci quote about FEAR] overlapping our position on harvesting infection and mortality data from co-morbidities [flu/pneumo, heart disease, diabetes and obesity] to drive the pandemic construct stating that COVID is the contingency for the same approach to the flu and the flu shot. They just changed the pathogen.

This was not a public crisis. This was an opportunistic marketing campaign to address a stated objective.


For the gazillionth time and long, long, long before anyone else save Dr. Martin and most certainly so, COVID-19 is entirely a pandemic of fraudulently propagated data. That we get to confirm it within the same context of its origins – undeniable patent evidence of the highest order evidentiary standards suitable for a court of law – makes the Moonshine effort all worth the while. 14 hours was the final count for this article.

The entire pandemic is fraudulent and the threats nonexistent – just as Moonshine has been hollering for over a year and a half. Please, America and for the sake of us all, listen.

Broken record played. Dead horse kicked.

Dr. Martin is my kind of guy and his evidence and presentation of it are the sort I crave. Thank you, sir.

I highly recommend viewing the entire Dr. Martin interview.


United We Stand, Divided We Fall, Masked We Submit, Vaccinated We Succumb

In a recent article by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit detailing a critical aspect of Moonshine reporting relative to COVID-19 and its corresponding survival rate of over 99.9% for essentially all age demographics and whereby a new study in England once again demonstrates that the survival rate for children is well in excess of 99.9% [99.995%], he asks a valid question I’ve asked times over in various forms – “Why would authorities push facemasks and vaccines on children for the coronavirus when it is next to impossible for kids to die from this disease?”

There’s a simple answer to this question, which I’ve delineated ad nauseam and in exclusive ways long before anyone else – long before. It’s this. Masking and vaccines have nothing to do with a pandemic or mitigating illness but rather establishing a system of absolute tyrannical control over the population as a de facto enslavement mechanism.

At this juncture, about anyone still participating in this utter bullshit – there are few descriptions better than that despite the profanity – deserves the enslavement brought down upon them. Sorry, but it’s been over a year and half and those who insist on continuing to play dumb games will deservedly continue to win stupid prizes.

Unfortunately though and as I’ve stated repeatedly, if enough of these feeble-minded cowards remain afraid and incapable of independent and critical thought followed by decisive action to rectify and redress their ills, they’ll drag us down with them. It’s at the juncture and whereby the rest of us will stand our ground that this nation will be divided (is divided); and deliberately and intentionally so and as wrought by China, treasonous Americans and others.

Mix in a summer’s worth [2020] of rioting, burning, looting, murdering and fake systemic racism for good measure. Then spice it up by injecting BLM into public education curriculum to ensure it sticks for longevity’s sake.

If you’ve read recent Moonshine articles regarding the McGreevey and Wood matters; especially the last one, you’ll know two things – I steadfastly stand by Mr. Wood and Dr. McGreevey and I’ve shared a little more about my background as a former fraud investigator, which is critical for the point that follows, which is predicated on this – the 2-party political system in America has not existed in decades.

The people analyzing the stolen election, COVID-19, both impeachments, the Capitol “insurrection” event and more – you know the list – through the lens of the 2-party political system will not arrive at the truth because it has little to do with conventional politics as they are thought to be writ large. Instead it has everything to do with fraud explaining why I found it immediately and have since stacked-up the empirical evidence in my favor and in spades.

It is precisely why I’ve been exactly on-point since 27 Dec 19 when COVID-19 was first announced to the world. In article after article I reminded people that the respective body of work relative to the fake pandemic will age like fine wine. Tomorrow it will be better than it is today. And even better the day after that.


It’s simple. The status quo has been delivered by a collectively compromised, bought and paid for cohort of treasonous politicians writ large conspiring with hostile foreign nations to execute one fraudulent construct after another and most prominently China. The mechanism leveraged to deceitfully convert America into a communist, socialist, Marxist nation is FRAUD.

Everything that’s been done to us has been sold as a fraudulent bill of goods. In order to steal America from Americans, the people must be hoodwinked and fooled into believing that the rationale and justification for such a radical transformation (Obama said he was going to “fundamentally change” the country) serves America well. It’s all fodder for the same Kool-Aid drinking and feeble-minded cowards described above.

Kicking a dead horse – I know fraud like the back of my hand and it’s my specialty. On that notion, here’s a question I’ve asked many pandemic believers (especially friends and family) before we start digging into meat and potatoes substance.

If the pandemic is real (12th deadliest year in the last 12 years – how?), why haven’t I gotten sick yet? I’ve never put on a mask deciding instead to remain a free and independent human being by going on unpaid leave and not receiving a paycheck since February since masking was conditional for work. I’ve never practiced social distancing instead going in the other direction by hugging, shaking hands (including complete strangers and often) and living traditionally like a free and independent human being. I’ve never had a flu shot. I’ll never get the vaccine.

Drawing on a recent quote from President Trump, I’ve done everything literally the opposite of what has been suggested and mandated. The net effect is that I’ve not even whiffed at being sick in almost 3 years. You see my point. Fake pandemic. Fraudulent pandemic. Fraud is my specialty. Refuse to participate. Full circle.

The aforementioned quote from President Trump is relative to the detestable and Chinese boot-licking Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, “I often act counter to people’s advice who I don’t respect.” That is fully emblematic of my stance toward COVID-19.

Now just mix in all of the empirical data points I’ve rendered copiously and graphically that fully, irrefutably, undeniably and to a threshold suitable for testimony in a court of law – something I was required to do as a fraud investigator by taking to the stand and testifying as to my sole work product and its methods and findings – and there is a literal a 0% chance that Moonshine broad positions on the pandemic are wrong. Zero.

Despite a group with some big brains existing in the backdrop of Moonshine, I produce all of the work independently (videos, articles, graphics, cover art, etc.) and my point is that Moonshine doesn’t produce news but rather analysis and therefore, I must rely on others to deliver the news for said analysis. Like always, we’ll move forward here with supporting items mostly from The Gateway Pundit and Zero Hedge.

As we go, our title will bear down because as a nation we’re embarking on rounding a corner from which we will never return. The net effect is that America the Constitutional Republic will [has] become Amerika the communist, socialist, Marxist nation. Therein, united we will stand, divided we will fall, masked we will submit and vaccinated we will succumb. We’re taking them out of this order.


Returning to the article introduced at the beginning, why would schools require masking when masks are irrefutably and fully ineffective in mitigating viral infection but whereby they create dangerous levels of carbon dioxide inhalation, cause wholesale unhealthy bacterial growth around the mouth and, at a point that it is critical for children to begin developing necessary and appropriate social skills, masks cover most of the face preventing a child from developing the ability to perceive social cues from changing facial expressions? Why when their survival rate is no less 99.995%.

Find me someone who bets against 99.995% odds and I’ll show you a cash poor idiot who should never be allowed to gamble again for his own sake. I’ll also show you a nation of feeble-minded cowards incapable of independent and critical thinking.

Masking will never work because it has never worked and was never intended to work relative to viruses. That was established and conventionally accepted science before the politically selective pandemic.

So then, the motivations behind masking mandates and suggestions must be heavily scrutinized and for example, why states and municipalities have them despite knowing fully what I just delineated. Shortcut and pro-tip: the mandates and suggestions have nothing to do with viruses, pandemics or similar other. Rather, it’s about exercising control and compelling acquiescence and tyrannical compliance. Period. Ball game.

Moreover, why is Anthony Fauci now stating unequivocally that 2-year olds should “mask-up without a doubt?” Don’t worry. Worry. Don’t Mask. Mask. Mask x 2. How many times has he intentionally provided guidelines contradictory to conventions and accepted science so as to achieve ulterior objectives? He’s the most self-contradicting and least expert expert around and he’s been doing it since 1984. He’s also unelected.

This man should be hanging in the public square and we can use a short rope, a small stool and a low hanging branch for that detestable midget. That is the only fitting end to his story and it’s long overdue. In alignment with rule of law, his military tribunal should be held first but let’s get to it and soon after President Trump’s re-installment.


China engineered the SARS-CoV-2 and then used to it to facilitate the theft of the election to install it’s proxy Joe Biden. Galvanizing this broader construct required fracturing the nation in half and into two distinct and irreconcilable divisions as described above and relative to vaccinated or not.

This approach is deeply rooted in the basic tenets of Sun Tzu doctrine to divide and conquer and win the war without actually fighting it. Rather, they’re trying to fool us into fighting ourselves to our own demise. How Americans can’t comprehend this is a testament to the degradation of the independent and critical thinking nature of traditional Americans and infuriating beyond description; not to mention entirely pathetic.

Create a virus; scare the feeble-minded, order-following, dependent and reliant people into vaccinating v. those who don’t to effectively split the nation into two before stealing it outright. See the status quo. It’s a solid plan that’s working so far.

Succumbing may be mandatory if the vaccination becomes the same. As outlined in this Zero Hedge item featuring a CNN segment, the Chinese News Network was again playing tee-ball setting it up for the home run. The prompt was, “Given where things are going, is it time to move on from saying please to mandating?” The reply was unsurprising in all ways Chinese and a direct recapitulation of what I offered a while back and times over, “I do think it’s time to start mandating vaccines. And I think that the private industry and private organizations will do that.”

Recalling that I have placed the public-private interface, corporations and private equity central to it all, I specifically warned several times that the Biden administration would compartmentalize the culpability for the enforcement of these draconian policies in these particular entities to circumvent constitutional safeguards. This functions exactly like the leveraging of federalism to permit rioting, enforce COVID mitigations, steal the election, etc., as I have delineated comprehensively in myriad articles.

Biden’s administration is also relentlessly working to stifle off-reservation messaging antithetical to China’s best interests for America and weaving a patently fraudulent tale of lies to make it happen.

For one, Biden has declared that Americans are proffering misinformation about COVID online and that it’s causing others to die. How ironic that is given that it’s Biden, Fauci, the CDC, the WHO and China that are actually doing this as evidenced? My work and evidence for this exists irrefutably, stacks-up to the ceiling and is rooted in the CDC’s own empirical data points once parsed-out through the lens of fraud.

For another and in the spirit of the “Patriot” Act being the least patriotic and most unconstitutional bill ever passed and taking note that 3 buildings were dropped in their own footprints in broad daylight to scares us into it, Biden is proclaiming that getting vaccinated is the “most patriotic” thing anyone could do. Again pardoning the expression, but that’s utter bullshit from an illegitimate president.

For yet another, the circle-back hack Psaki recently called for any such off-reservation messengers to be banned from all online platforms. Didn’t that already happen? I was forced to shutter my Twitter account for truth-telling. How many more times do I have to tell people we’re living in World War II Nazi era Germany before they’ll get it?


In another TGP item and recalling all of my previous work pertaining to the CCP’s infiltration of all of U.S. institutions as corresponding to the application of Chinese doctrine [One Belt, One Road], CNN, the Chinese News Network, continues to feature a Chinese born-doctor, Leana Wen, that has been making the rounds on the news and insisting first and previously that vaccines must be mandatory. Now Wen is insisting that those who aren’t vaccinated must complete mandatory paperwork and be tested twice weekly.

Make no mistake about it relative to our irrefutable [see then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s warning last year] positions on Chinese infiltration, Wen is hands-down a CCP operative and an infiltrator. She’s delivering CCP mandates and narrative to Americans and calling on our collectively compromised cohort of politicians to enforce it; especially China’s primary proxy Joe Biden.

To prove my point and in more exclusive work, how is that when I ran down the Surfside collapse, another Chinese-born woman identified as a premier attorney is central to the law firm co-managing the building? Why is it that every time we yank a thread, it pulls on a China? Rhetorical questions.

Any sort of mandatory and compulsory twice-weekly testing program is outright tyranny and de facto enslavement. Now ask yourself why is it coming from China? The same country that printed and delivered fake ballots for the stolen election; that bio-weaponized the SARS-CoV-2 virus that required us to have mail-in ballots; that received all of our manufacturing jobs; and that flooded our nation with opiates? WE’RE IN THE MIDST OF AN ASYMMETRICAL, IRREGULAR and UNDECLARED THIRD WORLD WAR and the Amerikan sheeple are oblivious to it.

Another TGP item informs us of a Department of Justice initiative to further divide the U.S. population by leveraging prosecutorial discretion. Therein, the DOJ is developing a data base to further persecute and prosecute Conservatives relative to the fraudulently constructive Capitol “insurrection” event. You can read that in layman’s terms as selectively prosecuting only those Americans who entered the trap set and managed by Nancy Pelosi as per the statement of Dr. Jonathan McGreevey.

In yet another example of the full might of the federal apparatus being leveraged against the Deep State’s political enemies – all of us – and further along the lines of placing Americans on lists, the Biden Administration is formulating lists for the vaccinated v. those not vaccinated; and they’re sending goons door-to-door as a part of it.

Which division will you be in – the vaccinated or not vaccinated? More importantly the key word is division because it represents an accomplished tactical objective.

Perhaps the most egregious and ominous example of dividing the nation derives from Biden’s CDC Director Rochelle Walensky who recently warned that we are to expect “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” This should have your hair on end and have you asking what are they going to do to us next?

If you understand Chinese doctrine and it’s application to America (articles explaining it can be found on the home page), the evidence for these division assertions exists in spades. American education is both compromised and grossly inadequate and so it’s unsurprising that a sizable portion of Americans who are incapable of critical and independent thought are flying blindly and obliviously while latching onto every word of their progressive, liberal Democrat rulers and marching us all to our demise if it continues unfettered.


With the release of the Maricopa County forensic audit results for the 2020 election now under way, there is no better time to broach national unification for it is the only way this Republic will continue to stand. At a point and soon, lost souls will turn to “conspiracy theorists;” otherwise known as people who actually know what in the hell is going on and see my description of an undeclared, asymmetrical and irregular third world war specifically, to understand what was done to them and the rest of us.

They’ll begin to warm-up to the color orange. They’ll realize that those of us hollering about 9/11, COVID-19, the stolen election, etc. were precisely right the entire time. They’ll need good information and all of us – those in the know – must be the arbiters of it. Until legacy media is gutted and restored we are all the news.

For anyone looking to comprehend a fulsome explanation that touches on about every aspect, dish them up some Moonshine. They’ll not find a more comprehensive and empirically evidenced explanation as understood by a veteran fraud investigator and I say that with confidence given that everything they’ve done to us has been underpinned by the construct of fraud.

Politics is essentially ancillary at this point and those clinging to political remedies or explanations will remain fools playing a fool’s game.

It’s all on us – the people. Bear the onus of gleaning a factual understanding. Bear the onus of sharing it with others. Bear the onus of comprehending that UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL, MASKED WE SUBMIT and VACCINATED WE SUCCUMB.


China is emerging more recently as a cornered wild animal; one with the international tables beginning to turn on it. In what appears to be a deliberate step to temper similar notions stateside, Biden has been given slack in his leash of Chinese red ribbon to quell perceptions of the direction in which he is being compelled to take this nation.

National traitor and former Vice President Mike Pence is even getting into the game as he works to establish credibility for his 2024 run as a reward for his actions on 06 Jan 21.

As I first warned in May of 2020 a few short months following the first report of the COVID outbreak, China has engaged us in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared third world war. It began in October of 2019 when the SARS-CoV-2 virus was deliberately released against us and the rest of the world.

Matters are escalating and China is cornered so please keep your eye on the ball. A third world war gone hot would be much more efficient at depopulation efforts than a upper respiratory virus now working to that end and if goes that far, Joe Biden will take a dive because that’s what he’s there to do so long as they haven’t already replaced him with a failed presidential candidate in Kamala Harris.




Pelosi’s Unconstitutional Expansion of Capitol Police to CA and FL Emblematic of Unfettered Attack on Americans

On orders from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, Capitol Police Regional Field Offices will be established in CA and FL as reported by Conservative Treehouse earlier this week. This is an absolutely remarkable and astonishing decision that is completely emblematic of Pelosi’s yet-to-be quenched thirst for unmitigated power, authority and tyrannical rule over supposedly free and independent Americans. Pelosi’s jaw-dropping encroachment on the U.S. Constitution by her overstepping of bounds to establish her own private federal police force working in conjunction with a rogue DOJ and FBI moves far beyond the legal jurisdiction of the Capitol Police Department. More concerning is that it occurs within the states of CA and FL that are of monumental importance relative to voting and elections.

Americans should be delineating a very red line and resolutely standing firm here. The question is, though, are Americans competent enough to discern that on the one hand, Pelosi and her ilk drove the “de-fund the police” agenda and now on the other hand, Pelosi is overstepping the bounds of the law to establish her own private federal police force in two states with more in the queue?


Extension of the Capitol “Insurrection”

The last time Pelosi sunk her claws into the Capitol Police, she orchestrated, ran point on and called the shots – literally, just ask Ashli Babbit – for the constructed and staged false flag event we call the Capitol “insurrection.” Therein Pelosi and then Vice President Mike Pence et al ordered the Capitol Police to stand down to facilitate the event.

Further, take note of the relevance of the U.S. Capitol Sergeant of Arms as enmeshed in all of it respective to our previous reporting regarding the statement transcripts from federal whistleblower Dr. Jonathan McGreevey as obtained by Mr. Lin Wood.

Clear imagery is available of “police deterrence” of protestors that would make the worst crisis actor blush with embarrassment. I suppose cops should be cops and actors should be actors and we shouldn’t cross these streams. On 06 Jan 21 and as it relates to one of the most secure buildings in the world, these cops were less functional than mops. Really though, they were doormen and tour guides inviting unwitting future defendants into a pit of vipers.

And there is no denying what has been outlined – it’s all on available video and with countless hours of additional surveillance footage still being withheld. That’s no accident.

This measure is an extension of the fraudulently constructed Capitol “insurrection” event devised to further galvanize her power and ability to target and pursue political enemies with the full might of the federal apparatus. Just ask those rotting in solitary confinement after having attended the Capitol event. Regardless, Pelosi is now clearly pushing up against constitutionality and in significant ways; in frightening ways and as if it weren’t terrifying already (at least for those who know what in the hell is actually occurring in this country.)

Why does Nancy need her own federal police force in two states outside of D.C. and why in to of the most important, critical and consequential states relative to voting and elections? Any of you Biden-voting, progressive liberals have good answers? I noticed all of your signs have disappeared since Joe and Kamala decided to go all Thelma and Louise and drive the Republic off a cliff and into a Third World canyon.


Let’s talk jurisdiction because it underpins this entirely. What follows is the legal basis for the jurisdiction of the Capitol Police Department. As you might imagine, it’s essentially limited to the grounds and functioning of the U.S. Capitol and its collective personnel, which includes lawmakers.


No geography degree is needed to discern whether the Capitol Police Department’s authority and jurisdiction is mapped-out to include the states of CA and FL.

Did the Capitol “insurrection” event serve multiple objectives like framing the second fraudulent impeachment of President Trump to effectively remove him and leveraging back against any American standing antithetical to their treasonous cause; and did those objectives also entail the unconstitutional and unmitigated expansion of Pesloi’s seemingly unilateral authority in the form of her own private federal police force? The evidence suggests the answers to be ‘yes.’

Getting What We Deserve Until

In light of Pelosi’s staggering and unconstitutional expansion of tyrannical power, I am compelled to ask, how many more times do I have to tell people that we’re living in World War II era Nazi Germany before they’ll get it?

Will this do it – Peolsi establishing her own private federal police force to target her political enemies and others in CA and FL and with other states in the queue? Does this expand her footprint to assassinate (Ashli Babbit) [at worst] and persecute and prosecute her enemies [at best] outside of “her House” (instead of just inside it)?

Rhetorical questions.

Or will it take the next overreach before they learn? Or the one after that? Or the one after that? Or the one after that?

This isn’t mission creep as the press release above is designed to reflect, but rather it’s the galvanizing of absolute tyrannical power and rule that was consolidated behind an erected wall around the Capitol and defended by the National Guard, which leverages federalism – a primary and underpinning component in how all of the treason was executed. The National Guard falls under the control of state governors allowing federalism to bear down. Therein, let us not forget that Pelosi et al denied Trump’s request for a National Guard presence before the “insurrection” only to demand and install one after.

How do we expect to put this genie back into the bottle? How when you consider that writ large, America is abjectly stupid and ignorant in just the right numbers; in just the places; and in all the right ways?

For evidence of this rather brutal assessment, simply examine how America was propagandized into thinking it’s systemically racist long after white America twice elected a black president, who happens to be serving his third term, and whereby the lion’s share of federal statistics on society and crime stand antithetical to the propaganda.

How long before one of these Capitol Police offices opens up near your neighborhood?

Papers, please.

It’s apparent that Pelosi has a deep, entangled and metastasizing blood lust for ultimate power and absolute tyrannical authority and she only seems to be warming-up to it.

The current short list includes two fake impeachments – the 1st as cover for COVID-19 – a fake Capitol insurrection for which she ran point and called shots (figuratively and literally), the persecution and prosecution of political enemies including the Conservatives that walked through Capitol doors being held open by Capitol police officers and now her own private federal police force to be established in two states outside of D.C. with more in the queue.

As much as it’s painful to say this right after Independence Day, anyone being honest with themselves must acknowledge that as it currently stands, America is a grade-A, Chinese-owned, shit hole, banana republic.

I’d bet a king’s ransom that the Founding Fathers would completely agree with me on this while also asking us what in the hell did we allowed to happen on our watch?

Where are all of the good people? The fighters? Could contemporary Americans even fight a revolution now? Do they possess the intestinal fortitude and grit required?

Writ large, most Americans don’t even possess the right information to found a revolution much less fight one. Maybe that will change with Maricopa County.

Compared to our historic contemporaries circa 1776, today’s American is a pathetic shell of a remnant as contrasted with those who fought and died in a revolution to create the grandest of Republics. The latter is a people brainwashed into the bliss of fake comforts, convenience and a fake sense of civic duty manifesting as a “social justice” agenda embedded into the public education indoctrination process.

Homework to prove the point: the next time you into public, look around you and ask how many people are a 1) even capable of being in a foxhole to begin with and 2) appear as someone that you would invite into your foxhole – figuratively speaking. Good luck because obese, wrongly prioritized, virtuous, distracted and ignorant soldiers don’t start revolutions and they certainly don’t win them. Perhaps this will change and hopefully soon.

The tone will soften when the torches and pitchforks appear. The question becomes exactly how bad does it have to get before a spark is lit beneath their collective asses and at that point, will it already be too late?

Perhaps if the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley wasn’t too busy licking China’s boots and spit-shining them with propagandized racist rants while his military dumbs-down standards for soldiers, inoculates them experimental vaccines, indoctrinates them with Critical Race Theory and rainbows-up all of their flagpoles, we could look to them for redress, but I guess not.

So, we will continue to look to our rightful president, President Trump; and do so hoping and praying that he has left a plan for remedy in his wake.

Until then – until Americans pull-up their bootstraps to find some gumption and resolve to effectively and forcefully eliminate our treasonous plague and those responsible for it – we will get what we deserve.

Right now, that looks like a Marxist, communist nation led by an illegitimate president and Chinese proxy.

Right now, all of the good banana republics are laughing at us.


What the Democrats, Deep State and China Do Much Better Than Us…And It’s Not Cheating but It Is Destructive – Patrick Bergy and The ShadowNet Case Study

There is a noticeable, palpable and ultimately destructive dynamic that has consistently plagued our cause and it deserves a dialogue and remedies and both of those are already long overdue. It’s something that is sown into our cause by outside hostiles at the same time it’s sown from within by infiltrators and those falling victim to basic and primal human psychology like ego, insecurity, territoriality and more. It’s something that stands as a plausible deal breaker to reinstalling our rightful President Trump and getting back the Republic. It’s something that has consequences we’re already living as a warm-up of unimaginably horrible things to come assuming we continue forward unmitigated.

It’s also something the Democrats, Deep State and China never do – fracture internally and within the ranks – rather preferring to default to what they do best and much better than us and it’s not cheating, but it is destructive. It’s marching in full lockstep.

Relative to this position, today we’ll examine the dynamics of ShadowNet – a story I’ve covered sparsely due to time and resource limitations – to better understand it all more fully. It will be our third example as preceded by two others – my own and another also enveloping Mr. Lin Wood like ShadowNet.


Let’s begin by pausing to understand why Patrick Bergy and ShadowNet are so important. ShadowNet can be regarded as a tool or an asset that can be deployed and leveraged to desired ends and it’s a direct overlay to the blueprint that Obama used (leveraging federalism) from 2009-2017 to set the stage for the what is now the present. ShadowNet is the creation of a contractor named Patrick Bergy and these are his words.

The ShadowNet program was massively expanded immediately after president Obama took office. It was an incredibly capable information operations project management tool capable of the same covert, social media psychological warfare the FBI just indicted 13 Russian’s for. So, I suppose the question that should be asked is do we only care if a foreign adversary is using it to influence our elections and other social issues? Or, do we agree anyone using such ethically questionable methods is a bad thing that jeopardized the integrity of our election process, which is the core of our nation’s democracy?

Patrick Bergy

It equates to ShadowNet being a tool used to help build what the architects outlined in the overthrow blueprints. Recently, I wrote ONE TWO articles revisiting those 2009-2017 Obama-era blueprints which manifest as the 2009 U.S. Counterinsurgency Guide (linked in article two.) This is a longstanding position for us.

Political Entanglements In and Out of Lockstep

Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Schumer, Obama, Biden, Harris, Waters, et al – you know the list. If there is one thing for which I hold all of these people in high regard respective to their capabilities as an enemy, it is their utter commitment to march in full lockstep and perhaps even as far as to the gallows if this all boomerangs back on them. We’ll have to see about that.

Mitch McConnell and his Republican Party are pathetic shills in this regard. Mitch’s clan acquiesces to whomever whenever they feel inclined to and they do so while exploiting all that they can along the way; and often with slack in the leash or walking orders from Mitch.

Therein is the buried gold to understanding it all – the fallacy of the two-party system. There’s no such thing and in its stead is a two headed beast of the same rigged system; and rigged against the common American regardless of race, creed, color, religion, culture, sex, political affiliation or any other social justice identity group you wish to include. It’s why division is lethal to our cause and ones own ignorance of reality can lead to ones own demise.

While one head of the beast appears fully married to one side of the political spectrum, the other head is matched oppositely but in reality, this is merely for aesthetics. As we know, each of the two heads is in lockstep beneath the surface. The rest is kabuki theater and fodder for politicians to explain it all away to the constituents.

The two headed beast has the Democrats serving as the hard-line parent driving fully in the crazy direction of off the cliff and into the Third World canyon. Meanwhile the Republicans serve as the mealy-mouthed parent to explain it all away. Found in between and for anyone thinking these two parents aren’t working together is a foolish child.

The finer point here and drawing back on the use of “Us” in the title is that “Us” doesn’t include the Democratic or Republican Parties. People still believing such and regardless of party affiliation are unwittingly a part of the broader problem responsible for where we find ourselves today. Rather, “Us” is Americans who want to fight to continue being American and that is what’s on the line.

Those ladies above are in full lockstep just like the political class and elites doing all of this to us.

Failure to march in full lockstep in China will get you killed. Oddly enough and not coincidentally, dissimilar thoughts about the U.S. can lead to ones own demise as well. Just ask Chris Sign. Just ask Seth Rich. Just ask John McAfee. Just ask others.

Three Examples

My introduction to this destructive dynamic of internal fracturing within the ranks of the cause began on 01 Jan 2020 when I decided to open a Twitter account in the days after the 27 Dec 19 outbreak of COVID-19. It is our first example.

Example 1

Although I wouldn’t be able to validate the positions until the first infection and mortality data sets arrived in February/March, I immediately opened a Twitter account to begin sharing the work with a larger audience and on a platform with reach. It coincided with establishing Political Moonshine as it is today and the corresponding efforts to extend my work beyond a hobby and in the direction of more formal analysis and citizen journalism.

As a former fraud investigator with a disdain for social media (hadn’t had any accounts for years and still have no personal accounts outside of Moonshine) my only objective was to spread the word – COVID-19 appears fraudulent and Americans need to know this otherwise we’ll march to our own demise. In retrospect, look around you.

So, I posted and posted and mostly no one listened.

It’s a shame, too, because Revolver published an article yesterday entitled ‘Chinese Professor Reveals Plot in Shock Video: US Elites and China Have Teamed Up to Take Control Of America’ and from it, the two primary entities are obviously evident – China and ‘U.S. Elites.’ President Trump has branded the latter and we have adopted it as BIG TECH, BIG MEDIA & BIG MONEY. It includes the political class and I recently wrote ONE TWO articles on it. In light of all this, I sent a text message to the group in dialogue behind Moonshine including the link and stating that based upon the headline alone, we’ve had it right the entire time.

And yet no one listened. Plenty called me crazy but mostly no one listened.

Even today and in the face of an abundance of evidence supporting our positions and the experiences and losses people have endured since 27 Dec 19, listeners are easier to come by but about as difficult to convince of the full scope. It’s an exercise in futility and the American mind is generally a programmed and feeble one.

I tell you all of this for a simple and contextual backdrop point and it’s this. I arrived to Twitter with little to no experience or interest in social media and naively and ignorantly so.

You see, I had mistakenly assumed that posts and articles exclusively standing alone in thought and content would be welcomed by like-minded others touting themselves as selfless patriots committed only to the cause. How wrong I was. Twitter was a jungle and the users territorial, tribal and narcissistic.

Motivated by feedback from one of our three primary sources including the message to “keep going” because I seem to be the “only one who has figured it out,” two of the big-brained Twitter accounts in our Moonshine group were feeding me accounts to contact, which I did.

I reached out to countless big accounts with huge followings and mostly through direct messaging. Each message included backdrop details about our group, effort and work and would include a link to an article with the simple request of re-posting and sharing the work simply to spread the word.

Almost all of them never got back to me despite often sending a follow-up message.

One stole my work and began reading it on his podcast as his own. A reader let me know and he never bothered to reply to the multiple direct messages I sent him inquiring about it. Rather, he kept reading it all as his own. He’s since fallen out of sorts with @ToreSays and others and people are abandoning him as I type.

You likely know every one of the accounts about which I’m talking if you were active in our cause prior to the great Twitter purge, of which I was a victim and which caused me to shutter the account.

Scott Kesterson of Bards FM was an exception kind enough to throw-out an introduction for Moonshine work but that was essentially it, save one particular account that I hold in the highest of regards, but which has gone through multiple moratoriums on posting including a very, very long one currently. It’s @EntheosShines/@Entheos.

Of all the accounts I contacted – all of the “patriots” fighting for the cause – only Entheos engaged back to routinely post Moonshine article after article; sometimes on his own and other times after I had passed it along. Moreover, sometimes the article was in response to investigative requests from him. From all of this, a relationship developed and there exists a long history of direct message exchanges both solicited and unsolicited that were hugely beneficial in shaping our understanding of some particular details and providing vectors for further investigation.

Entheos stood alone. He was never wrong. He was always helpful. He always delivered. I owe Entheos (him/they) a debt of gratitude.

Most importantly, how does Entheos reflect back on all of those other accounts to provide an exemplar of the dynamic we’re discussing?

What about the dozens of other accounts? Were they just the victims of ego? Of insecurity? Of territoriality? Of being tribal? Or something else?

It’s a dog eat dog world and even for dogs of the same pack. While the dogs are busy repetitively pissing over the others’ marked territory, barking over the others’ barks and infighting for alpha status, they fail to realize that this is no way to get out of the pound; much less engage in a revolution; much less win one.

Perhaps for some of those dogs, that’s by design.

The bottom line is that no one is going to give a single shit about whom knew what when and told the story first whether that be from ones now mandated Mandarin class or from FEMA camp or from a grave or from whatever other un-American destination may come of this all.

Marxist, communist revolutionary overthrows consolidating power from behind a wall and amidst an extreme military presence; and replete with the subsequent targeting of political enemies with the full federal apparatus, typically don’t end very well for the losers; especially the leaders, the truth tellers, the vocal ones, etc. That includes all of these infighting dogs apparently oblivious to history.

Just ask the jailed “Capitol insurrectionists.” Just see Pelosi’s Capitol Police force now expanded to California and Florida.

Does anyone really believe that a revolution – and one being fought primarily in the realm of information warfare – can be won with division and internal fracturing within the ranks? And extending into leadership? And with ego, insecurity, territoriality or tribalism trumping the cause? And with anything other than a united front marching in lockstep?

That’s a fool’s game. That’s why when I see other and more substantive occurrences of this dynamic replicating across the landscape of our cause it registers concern for alarm. That’s why we’re here.

All of the above helps explain why I value and appreciate it so greatly when someone like Dr. John McGreevey, Lin Wood or Garrett Ziegler re-posts Moonshine articles like Entheos. The greatest importance in that is the validation of the work toward achieving the objective, which has been solely to spread the word.

In the last article, I explained why I value Mr. Wood’s opinions and thoughts so highly and they’re important to understand for several reasons. They form the basis for why I remain steadfastly by his side in all of this and it all draws back on my past professional experience relative to Mr. Wood’s impeccable record.

It’s Mr. Wood and Dr. McGreevey that also provide our second example of precisely what I’m asserting about our cause.

Example 2

The last Moonshine article outlined Dr. McGreevey’s statement as obtained by Lin Wood et al. That statement contains a delineation situating Matt Couch as a saboteur for an advisement (video) produced by McGreevey as a warning to President-elect Trump in 2016. McGreevey specifies how Couch acted solely for personal and selfish reasons over the cause and to the detriment of President Trump, whom did not receive the warning, and the nation as a whole.

How are we supposed to fight a revolution or win one with these tactics and divisions? Rhetorical question.

Example 3

Our third example also envelops Mr. Wood and is found in his public dispute with Patrick Bergy, bringing us back to ShadowNet in our introduction. This scenario matches Mr. Wood opposite of Bergy and aligned with Lt. General Michael Flynn and Sidney Powell. It’s important to note that Powell, Flynn and Wood are rightfully regarded as established leadership in our cause.

The conflict that Bergy outlines is substantial.

Bergy minces no words in substantially weighty allegations against Powell, Flynn and Wood (emphasis mine),

I went to DC shortly after the November 3rd election to provide my sworn affidavit on election interference. For over 2 months I watched is (“in” – sic) dismay as hundreds of MIC contractors picked the bones of Trumps presidency like vultures with fresh carrion. Multi-million dollar contracts were being used to investigate election tampering by the same people President Trump was trying to eliminate – the Military Industrial Complex. What could possibly have gone wrong with that plan? LoL

I attended numerous meetings with Patrick Byrne, co-founder of Overstock.com, met with Joe Flynn, investigators working for Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood and many others at the “tip of the election scandal spear”.

It didn’t take long for me to see that my affidavit, although verified by these same people, was being covered-up. When I asked Patrick Byrne directly to his face to “tell me straight, is my affidavit going to President Trump with the rest of the whistle-blowers affidavit’s,” Patrick was at least honest with me and said, “no.” He told me it was briefed to Flynn and his team and everyone freaked out (I’m paraphrasing) and his impression to me was that it was going to be used for something later.

Smelling bullshit (not from Patrick, I liked him. He was actually honest, but Flynn, Powell, Lin… not so much) I moved out of the room I was being provided by Patrick Byrne and reached out to my supporters to help me cover my own expenses so I would be subject to their BS. You will see that stated as such in my e-mail to Sidney Powell and Lin Wood following the Ali Akbar staged PSYOP event (see video and affidavit I posted at that same time below Powell email).

I gave Sidney Powell the opportunity for herself and Lin Wood to explain why my affidavit exposing Obama/Biden’s ShadowNet, which was HEAVILY VETTED & VERIFIED by multiple teams of investigators, was covered-up and they chose not to answer. After seeing reports of Gen. Flynn’s brother being in the room when the request for help to the National Guard was rejected, I’m now even more concerned that my affidavit was covered-up because they had another plan of their own on January 6th involving the attack on the capital.

To my knowledge, and I have a lot of evidence to support this from my meeting with Mayor Guiliani, whom it was clearly also kept from, my affidavit was kept from President Trump by Flynn, Powell and Wood. I’m seeing that a lot of things that could have proven President Biden rigged and stole the election was kept from President Trump, which I believe was not only criminal, it was potentially part of a sedicious (sic) conspirary (sic) and likely illegal. It is because of this I’ll be taking this email, my affidavit and other evidence to the FBI investigating the January 6th attacks. 

This evidence will exonerate President Trump in the upcoming impeachment trial, and I fully intend to have it included into the record. It is my hope that Mayor Guliani will help me to expose this in his testimony as well. If not, then I’ll cross that bridge when I get to it. Thus far he’s been straight with me. This must be heard if we are ever going to get a handle on such treasonous attacks in the future. I’d also argue there may have been more involved with the election investigation than just counting the votes; stealing the voter data acquired by court orders is just one of many possible things we need to investigate. They were up to something, and none of it to me looks good. We need to find out what. 

Whatever their intentions, these people were lying to me, you and all American’s for a very long time and jeopardizing our national security in the process. I believe had my affidavit been given to President Trump as required by law, much of what happened on January 6th, if not all, would have been avoided. That includes the current impeachment of President Trump that’s based on the pre-planned attack on our nations capital by many of the same people that were attacking me, covering up my affidavit and the social media influence operation that lead to the attack – many of whom were literally former PSYOP colleagues of mine that are still active in the military.

Patrick Bergy

Bergy knows exactly what he’s saying and we agree completely in his comments below. What needs parsing-out, though, is determining which side of the line on which he falls as demonstrated by timing and his actions – not his words.

If Bergy were so concerned about advising the President on a particular timeline, why did he wait until after 03 Nov 20 to approach the President relative to his intelligence when he began working on ShadowNet in 2007?

Why didn’t he approach President Trump early like then NSA Director Mike Adams did on 17 Nov 16?

Do these look like the words of a dedicated and selfless patriot serving the cause or do they look like sown narrative being established by an operator?

I don’t know too many fighters who win by just standing by and watching and no matter how futile the fight may appear.

Another way for Bergy to have said it is, “I have information to help you stop the crime that was already committed.” That approach does no good. This is nonsensical and erodes at Bergy’s credibility.

Admiral Mike Rogers entered service as the NSA director on 03 Apr 14 and served until 04 May 18 thus transiting two administrations in this capacity – Obama to Trump. Bergy is throwing the NSA under the bus and for good cause – more on that momentarily.

Rogers, though, and unlike Bergy, went to Trump early as noted. Why did Bergy wait until after the fact? What motivations lie behind that? What ulterior agenda lies behind that if there is one and I think there may be – more momentarily.

Examining the status quo and dragging the FBI into it, remember what Bergy said, “…I’ll be taking this email, my affidavit and other evidence to the FBI investigating the January 6th attacks.”  The Bureau has exercised selective enforcement of the law and the DOJ selective prosecutorial discretion; and all relative to the Capitol “insurrection” event.

This moves Bergy into the camp of a questionable FBI under questionable (compromised?) leadership both at the FBI and in the DOJ (Director Christopher Wray and AG Merrick Garland, respectively.)

Currently, the FBI’s investigation appears as a cover-up operation to serve the primary cover operation being orchestrated by Pelosi, who is calling for a full House commission to investigate 06 Jan 21. This is the cover mechanism unfolding for us to view in real time. You can add it to the image above.

How does this reflect on Bergy’s credibility, reliability, agenda and motivation relative to his assertions and relative to the claims against Powell, Flynn and Wood when he attacks them for something he waited four years to deliver and then yanked it back and took it to this particular FBI? It looks absolutely horrendous.

Bergy is the one throwing people under the bus but then he pivots to the federal law enforcement agency with a clearly demonstrated bias against the cause or anyone aligned with it. For the FBI, this is especially true in light of last summer’s rioting, looting, burning, beating and murdering. Where are those arrests and prosecutions?

In my analysis, it appears as if Bergy is a controlled operator; perhaps an infiltrator. This makes Bergy’s allegations and the circle-back to the FBI highly questionable; especially when one acknowledges that investigations are either opened to reveal and prosecute -or- to conceal and seal away.

Bergy is pivoting to the FBI to conceal information and evidence while hanging it on Powell, Flynn and Wood. If you look at what I’m outlining here, it rings hollow. Very hollow.

Through an informed lens, it really appears as if Bergy constructively attacked and then pivoted to the FBI for cover and concealment.

Where is this evidence of which Bergy speaks? How can Bergy evidence whether or not President Trump viewed his affidavit or was briefed on it when he wasn’t privy to any of those meetings? He’s hanging his hat on something for which there is no evidence unless President Trump decides to release it. This isn’t by accident. It’s by design.

Why hasn’t Bergy provided his evidence publicly like Mr. Wood has done with the statement of Dr. McGreevey? Bergy’s motivations and principal[s] lend toward answering that question.

How does Bergy know that Trump wasn’t briefed on his affidavit and in some capacity perhaps relative to an ongoing operation and whereby the contents of the affidavit placed that operation in some form of jeopardy? That’s what I gathered from his statement above regarding Flynn and in this case, Powell, Flynn and Wood remain Trump’s firewall.

What Bergy was likely doing for reasons not entirely known but also not hard to conjure up was creating a scenario that placed President Trump into conflict by causing pressure on Trump to defend himself with classified information of strategic value.

So, was Bergy maneuvering on a constructive element with strategic value? That’s one explanation and it’s a good one with his FBI alignment.

Recalling Bergy’s claims, consider what it looks like if Bergy knows that his affidavit reached President Trump and then the Capitol “insurrection” event still unfolds? One would have to presume that Trump et al had foreknowledge of the 06 Jan 21 event and permitted it to happen, which is exactly what I’ve been outlining according to evidence and analysis. One would also presume that Bergy also knows this. For clarity, my analysis situated this scenario as occurring prior to Inauguration Day and I got that timing very wrong.

Does Mr. Wood strike you as a reluctant legal advisor who skirts the edges and takes loosely his onus and responsibilities? Have you read the transcripts he took from Dr. Johnathan McGreevey? Does he seem timid of heavy-hitting intelligence? Does he appear reluctant to embark on matters that equate to career suicide? Is it such that the reticence on the end of Powell, Flynn and Wood wasn’t necessarily the message but rather the messenger? Those are all rhetorical questions.

Meanwhile, in this article we’ve generated a long list of direct, appropriate and legitimate questions for Bergy.

If the President were briefed but wished to keep that confidential, Powell, Flynn and Wood remain the firewall and naturally draw Bergy’s scrutiny, which they clearly did. Whether Trump knew or didn’t know or was briefed or wasn’t briefed and beyond anecdotal or circumstantial evidence that may or may not encompass Rudy Giulaini, how does Bergy evidence this and where is that evidence?

Clearly, Bergy holds our attention because he is the contractor who secured a 2007 U.S. DoD contract for $240,000 to spend one year in Iraq building what would become ShadowNet.

In all of this, the parties are draw into conflict – Bergy, as someone who is material to the matters at hand, is in conflict with Powell and Flynn, who are both material and additionally leadership; and Wood, who is leadership. It represents internal fracturing within the ranks and leadership of our cause and it deserves a dialogue and remedies that result in exposing the truth in it all.

We’ll close with a cursory examination of the gravity behind a primary Bergy claim – the nature of the public-private interface relative to ShadowNet, Dynology Corporation, ClearForce, Twitter, Facebook and former General James Jones. This is depicted in the Bergy tweet above and can be further consumed and understood independently.

Our focus is on Jones and it is critically important to remember that he ties directly back to old reporting from June of 2020.

Former General James Jones is front and center and standing right along side former General Mattis in this treasonous military cohort. Bergy’s claims about Jones are meritorious and should be scrutinized and investigated fully as the evidence supports our cause.

Bergy; however, is also the source of the conflict here and in ways antithetical to how others within the ranks and leadership of our cause have functioned. That should also be scrutinized and investigated fully.

Somewhere in between the full truth lies and my nickel is on the side of Sidney Powell, Lt. General Michael Flynn and most certainly, Lin Wood.


A multitude of very serious and weighty matters are coming due. They are ones that will be immensely impactful to the nation and in the most significant ways beginning with the anticipated results of the Maricopa County forensic audit.

Once these developments begin breaking, devastated Americans will come to learn what was done to them and by whom and they will turn to the leadership of our cause. Once they do; once they look leadership squarely in the eye, they can’t see internal fracturing there and down through the ranks.

Ideally, someone needs to come forward and shine the light of truth on the full scope of what is outlined here so that it works for us; not against us.

Anyone thinking that an internally fractured revolutionary cause marching out of lockstep can be successful in its endeavor is a fool playing a fool’s game.


McGreevey Mapped Makes Matters Meaningful: Mad Maxine, Rod-centric and the McGreevey/Lin Wood Transcripts

Why are we giving credence to Dr. Jonathan McGreevey and his statement as obtained by Lin Wood, et al on 09 Jan 21? Why, when we are in the midst of a stolen election, a fraudulent pandemic, a fraudulent Capitol “insurrection,” the looming Maricopa County [AZ] forensic audit results and more?

Reliable With Certainty

We’re drinking from a fire hose right now, so why do we focus on McGreevey?

It’s as simple as saying that if the nation’s preeminent defamation attorney with a sterling record and having litigated some of the country’s biggest cases finds veracity in Dr. McGreevey’s testimony and to the extent of obtaining a statement, then it’s reliable with certainty.

Here’s why we can assume this position with confidence.

For one, defamation attorneys like Mr. Wood litigate lies for a living but they don’t proffer them and especially not on the grandest of stages and in the most consequential matters.

For another, this is especially so in light of the nature of the claims and assertions with which Mr. Wood has gone on the record. Mr. Wood has attacked apex predators with some of the worst imaginable allegations and if you understand “political reality,” you know this is career suicide outside of the absolute truth and even within it, it’s attempted suicide at best.

For yet another, I worked for attorneys for years and in this precise capacity – investigating to verify someone’s background, claims, assertions and provision of evidence to inform the attorney accordingly.

Conventions have this work occurring on the front end of a case for fact finding and determining overall reliability. This means that in the initial stages of Mr. Woods’ handling of Dr. McGreevey, tangible evidence was presented to Mr. Wood that would frame the nature of the questioning in the statements to be obtained. The evidence would also substantiate and validate McGreevey’s claims to a threshold of Mr. Woods’ determination and then factor into setting the course for further handling.

Summarily, this means that Mr. Wood is far enough into McGreevey’s handling that we know due diligence was given and reliability was confirmed on the front end. This would all be done prior to obtaining the statement and then going public with all of the details.

Defamation attorneys (or any others worth their salt) that don’t do it this way aren’t defamation litigators for long and if they are, they’re likely hungry, cash poor and thinking about getting into teaching.

Dr. McGreevey’s assertions and claims plow straight ahead into ‘conspiracy theory’ as per the mainstream definition, but when you come to understand what has happened to him and his life, you’ll see that McGreevey not only had nothing to gain, but he lost everything including his health.

More importantly, McGreevey’s assertions and claims functionally map-out as incredibly informative and in the capacity of linking a number of critical, broad and overarching components in the longer political continuum that has targeted President Donald J. Trump and the American people. This why were are here.

Dr. McGreevey provides answers and needed binding for seemingly disassociated individuals, entities and constructive components and now we have it all mapped out.

The Transcripts

Sometimes, it is beneficial to read full transcripts directly, but they can be cumbersome and inefficient making it arduous, tedious and time-consuming to parse out important details, make connections, etc.

That’s why it’s beneficial to have the individuals, entities and constructive components mapped-out in the style of an “infographic” or flowchart; especially when the objective is understanding linkages, processes, nexuses, sequences, patterns, etc.

We now have both and they should be very utilitarian and beneficial moving forward.

The work that follows entailed 1) an initial read of the transcripts, 2) re-reading the transcripts for mapping by hand (16 pages of notes) and 3) rendering the flowcharts to digital form. By the time this article is done, it will have taken about 45 hours in 3 days.

The link for the statement transcripts PDF is linked at the bottom of the article.


This won’t take long to outline or understand. Former DAG Rod Rosenstein is the hub to our wheel; the brains or central feature to our construct. Dr. McGreevey calls the whole thing “Rod-centric.” I couldn’t agree more.

Mad Maxine

Do you remember Maxine Waters, D-CA long ago talking about this ultimate spying apparatus – a database [network, tools, personnel] that Obama used to spy on everyone, keep them under his thumb and aligned; and to create a network of reliable [blackmailed and leveraged] people around him?

Here she is.

After having watched that and as you examine the diagrams below, keep this in your mind.

Is the “Dirty Tricks Squad,” which would link over to former CIA Director John Brennan [“Baltimore” in the diagrams] and the CIA, what Maxine is talking about?

Is DTS the Obama spy/leverage apparatus as per Maxine?

I believe it is.

The Images

Here are the images and they are constructed and presented as included in the introductory information.

These images are really for the informed reader with a basic understanding already in place that is looking to gain deeper comprehension by examining the entanglements and connections. To fill in the missing gaps, see the full statement transcripts linked at the bottom and use the search function from the Moonshine website or other.

Here are the images for your independent consumption.

The full McGreevey transcripts can be found HERE.


Momentum and Evidence Suggest Surfside Is a Deflection Point Construct

There is plenty of momentum and accumulating evidence to suggest that the South Tower collapse at the Champlain complex in Surfisde is a constructed event serving as a deflection point away from the emerging truth about the stolen 2020 election as manifesting in the full public spectrum and beginning with the forensic audit results in Maricopa County. Initially, the Arizona audit results were incorrectly rumored to start being released this past Monday causing one to ask if perhaps that was deliberate misinformation/disinformation tactic devised to result in a tipped hand and a peek at the playing cards to ascertain what the plausible response may be. No matter, the results are now loosely slated for the beginning of August. Until then, the Surfside story will continue to be developed and crafted in the MSM to detract and occupy headlines.

If you haven’t consumed our Surfside video and the article in which it is contained, both are necessary for appropriate contextual backdrop in this item because it is very big picture but with granular details drawing back to China and the CCP.

Given our established fact set following the first article and video, I recently put it like this to help people understand the lens through which Surfside is being scrutinized. This will help frame the direction of this article, which vectors-off in several directions.


Let’s begin with momentum and in particular, political momentum; and for good reason.

First, remember one of our longstanding principles in all things statecraft – investigations are opened for two primary reasons: 1) to reveal the truth, present the evidence and prosecute the offenders -or- 2) to conceal the truth, seal away the evidence and protect the offenders. This is especially true when questionable events have specific political purpose and value, such as capitalizing on tragedy and death as a deflection point away from a stolen presidential election.

With these givens, is anyone really surprised that Biden is both visiting Surfside and calling for a FEDERAL investigation into the South Tower collapse by the ? Of course not.

The political momentum here presents as 1) Joe Biden making a personal visit to Surfside and 2) Biden’s call for an official (federal) investigation into the collapse. It’s a simple as saying Biden is going to leverage the construct precisely as we’re alleging; that he will have the evidence enveloped, sealed away and then explained away in the investigative report that presents summary findings comporting with political objectives and obviously so.

In short, the political momentum here is a rehash of the following image – just reduce the size and add a column to the right for Surfside. Pro-tip, make it real small and add a bunch of columns to the right to accommodate what is hopefully in the pipe circa August.

Even worse, it doesn’t appear as if Surfisde’s HOA has an interest in arriving at the truth given this from MSN.

With Biden dragging-in the FBI and the NIST for the cover-up, Surfside’s hiring of KCE is troubling for all of the obvious reasons. Is Surfside chipping-in on Joe Biden’s pile? Who is making these decisions for Surfside? Why isn’t Surfside’s full slate of HOA members featured on its home page? Who is the president of the HOA? Who hired KCE and why? How does Becker & Poliakoff factor into decisions made as the co-managing partner? Why is that every time attorneys are involved, the truth is the furthest thing from reach?


Our discussion here really focuses on two primary components but the waters get real murky very fast: ownership and management. We’re murky already because ownership and management are enmeshed at Surfside and with a homeowner’s association (HOA) and law and accounting firms entangled and situated in between.

One of the troubling aspects in the initial work here was actually identifying the owner/s of the Champlain complex. Interestingly, generic terms like “the owners” were generally used in the early reporting. Subsequently, we have identified the owner’s as drawing back on a 2014 timeline.

From Zero Hedge and immediately beginning with controversy (emphasis mine),

Champlain Towers developer Nathan Reiber, who died in 2014, was once accused of paying off local officials to sidestep a construction moratorium in Surfside in 1979 because of problems with the sewer system, according to WaPo

Reiber had “contributed” to the campaigns of local officials that granted him preferential treatment when it came to building Champlain Towers South in 1981. 

WaPo noted all the principals involved in the design and construction of the building are deceased. Former construction companies that played a role in the construction of Champlain Towers were unwilling to talk about the building collapse. 

Meanwhile, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, part of the Department of Commerce, is the federal agency that investigated the collapse of the twin towers, sent one of its engineers, Fahim Sadek, to Champlain Towers North, a couple of blocks away from the southern tower, to examine basement area and try to piece together the complex puzzle of why the building collapsed. 

We noted two reports that were recently completed on Champlain South. The first was a field study conducted by an engineering firm in 2018 that identified structural damage to concrete slabs under the pool deck and cracking and crumbling in the parking garage. However, there was no evidence of imminent collapse. The second was a study from 2020 that outlined the tower was sinking in the 1990s by 2 millimeters a year.  

The condo building was already conducting its 40-year recertification repair at the time of the collapse on early Thursday morning. 

$15mm? I commented on this notion in the first article by asking, “whether this plagued building with documented structural integrity concerns dating back to the 1990s was hand selected to fall at a precise and needed time; and whether there may be a line of connections and nexuses from one end of our rope to the other and thus supportive such a notion.”

Surfside was as ripe a piece of fruit as it could be to be selectively plucked for controlled demolition. Did the Deep State (intelligence community) pluck it? My nickel is on the affirmative.

Adding to the existing and documented financial strain plaguing Surfside’s ownership, the building also maintained 30% vacancy and likely had trouble eliminating it due to economic conditions, COVID-19 and the full scope of Surfside’s structural problems.

I’m betting the financials for this place are horrendous ergo the portal for fraud. Knowing who manages those financials is critical as will be determining if there any compromising interfaces (intelligence community?).

Not surprisingly, Surfside’s long and well-known history of structural integrity issues had the South Tower facing upwards of $15mm worth of repairs, as reported by MSN. This causes the fraud hair on the back of my neck to stand on end but not as much as learning that the building collapsed after its “40-year recertification repair” work had begun, but not before the really, really, really expensive repairs.

In the world of fraud investigation, timing like this doesn’t happen unless it’s made to happen.

Notable above is the entanglement and conflicting reports derived from Morabito Consultants, which is our draw back to D.C. from the first article. Also recall and as mentioned above that Champlain is co-managed by the HOA and the law firm Becker & Poliakoff.

Becker is important because it features the star of the first article – our Chinese-born, CCP cookie-cut-out premier attorney, who serves as the chairwoman of the Asian Financial Society, which is a functionary of China’s One Belt, One Road doctrine and a patented CCP outfit.

In April, Surfside HOA president Jean Wodnicki advised residents that the structural integrity concerns call for an expedited timeline and placed the repairs at $15mm. This abuts to the June hiring of Morabito Consultants. Wonicki also passed the buck by saying, “A lot of this work could have been done or planned for in years gone by…But this is where we are now.”

This is an important distinction. Does it sound like Wonicki was well apprised of the full scope of Surfside’s problems or is she getting news and stomping on the gas? Is she playing coy to save her own ass or is it that there is a need for an expedited timeline based upon information received in close proximity to her April advisement? Did she know all along? Were Becker & Poliakoff representatives fully transparent with the HOA and did Wonicki and the board know everything they knew? What exactly did each know and when did they know it? Overlaying those two timelines could be very revealing if we could build and evidence them both accurately.

From the same Yahoo article, “Donna DiMaggio Berger, an attorney for the condo association, previously told the WSJ that Morabito’s report from 2018 was not out of the ordinary.

Note that Berger, like Kenneth Director and Jie Chengying Xiu, works at Becker & Poliakoff.

Is there a rift between the HOA and its managing partner, Becker & Poliakoff? Are the questions I just asked above more relevant? Does it smell like fraud may be in the air?

This is Berger.

Morabito is drawn into conflict because residents, as represented by their co-managing HOA and whereby there exists a duty to keep all homeowners and residents fully apprised of requisite information; especially safety and structural integrity concerns, appear to have been unaware of major components of Morabito’s findings and reports.

Was Becker & Poliakoff being forthright and transparent with the Wonicki-led HOA? What did Wonicki know? What did the full board know? What did Becker & Poliakoff know? Did the latter know more or differently than the two former? Were Morabito’s reports submitted to the full HOA board or to Becker & Poliakoff? We can and should ask these types of questions all day.

From the same MSN, piece,

Again, note the timing here. The building had been plagued by documented structural integrity concerns since the 1990s, multiple related reports were received dating back several years and yet repairs weren’t slated to begin until June 2020 after Morabito was hired to begin the recertification process. Who controlled that timeline – the HOA, Becker or both?

The least expensive work (roof) began first before the millions and millions and millions that would have been poured into the balance of the work represented by concrete restoration. In between, the building simply fell down in its own footprint.

As a history lesson refresher, there are only 3 other modern structures to do this as indicative of controlled demolition. Ironically, the first one also bears the name of the South Tower and it collapsed by means of controlled demolition on 11 Sep 01 along with the North Tower and Building 7.

Surfside appears like a rehash of an old play out of an even older playbook. You can also mix-in the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in OKC for good measure (evidence on Clintons.) It’s no surprise that the NIST – the same 9/11 cover-up agency that constructed the patently fraudulent “progressive collapse” narrative, is being tabbed by Biden in this case

Post-9/11, the NIST was in-part charged managing the evidence at the scene and ensuring that all findings were aligned with the desired intelligence community narrative. I wonder whether there was any evidence that required managing at Surfside. As one possible but unconfirmed example is that some have speculated that now-deceased John McAfee’s dead man’s switch was located inside a unit he is rumored to have owned. This is where the intelligence community bears down with full might in light of Sharma & Associates being situated to possess those records and hypothetically it looks like Sharma>RAW>CIA/Mossad.

There is even more troubling evidence in the form of homeowner’s emails as per MSN.

Controlled demolition involves substantial and very precise preparation that can be time-consuming. One wonders what the motivation might be to begin early and only to have it all fall down before the most expensive work could begin.

One wonders how easy it would be to collect insurance payouts if the collapse narrative were backed by the President of the United States, who visited (will visit) the aftermath and who insists that the same cover artists responsible for the cover-up of 9/11 handle the investigation to determine that narrative. One wonders what that motivation there may be on the part of and how open ownership and management may be to brokering a deal. That’s hypothetical, of course, but my fraud hairs on end.

Our concerns about a constructed Surfside event and cover-up become further entrenched as The Guardian noted on Monday when White House Spokesperson Jen Psaki had this to say and noting her completely appropriate use of the word “constructive”, because that will be the end result – a constructed narrative accomplishing an objective not associated with the delivery of the truth,

At Monday’s press briefing, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden “does believe there should be an investigation” and that a number of federal agencies were already on the ground, including FEMA building science experts, officials from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, OSHA and the FBI.

“We want to play any constructive role we can play with federal resources and getting to the bottom of it and preventing it from happening in the future,” Psaki said.

Returning to ownership and management, we note that the original developer, Nathan Reiber, died in 2014.

Conveniently, all of the other developers or contractors working on Champlain are either also dead or not talking. Even worse, the attorneys managing and representing Champlain also initially refused to comment. Nothing to see here, folks, move along now.

Contributing more to the cloudy picture of ownership, the South Tower had 138 registered owners (represented by their HOA/Becker & Poliakoff) while LLCs (limited liability corporations) and investment firms own “some apartments.” This creates an opportunity to possibly tie the South Tower collapse to a critical component in the overarching and generational construct – private equity as diagrammed above.

Thus far, we’ve drawn down on BlackRock and Vanguard specifically but I’m not expecting to make that connection here. Rather, I’d suscpet to see something more along the lines of veiled LLC/investment owners of Surfside units, perhaps holding them a rentals or for some other purpose. It’s important to remember here that each unit possess a HOA vote. If one private entity owned a block of units, they’d also own a block of HOA votes. Those votes would directly impact the management of Champlain ergo the decisions that go into managing it.

What are the LLCs and investment firms behind those units and what are those numbers and details?

It all equates to a shell game and we play it a lot as you’ll see in reading further.

As sourced from Boca News Now,

Latching onto ‘Champlain Towers South Associates,’ “Champlain Towers South Condominium Association, Inc.” is rendered and from it, we get some answers. We also get confirmation on ownership as reported by NBC Miami and with the first filed lawsuit against Champlain, “A class-action lawsuit has been filed in the 11th Circuit Court against the Champlain Towers South Condominium Association in Surfside.

Note Becker & Poliakoff as the ‘registered agent’ while giving attention to the other similar business indicated. From the latter, we net the following and noting that the other “Champlain” entities did not demonstrate tie-backs to our purpose here given the resources at hand: CHAMPLAIN TOWERS SOUTH MANAGEMENT CO.: An inactive for-profit last active in 1983; the principals are indicated as Nathan Reiber & SJ Levine; the registered agent is Stanley Joel Levine; and it was involuntarily dissolved.

Further drilling down on ownership and management, from Surfside’s website, which is minimal and contains hardly any valuable information, we note the presence of Sharma & Associates, Inc. as a representative of the HOA conducting nuts-and-bolts management for Champlain in addition to the HOA-Becker relationship. We gather this from the linked PDFs at the bottom of the Surfside page.

IMPORTANT: MOVING FORWARD, note that I am mapping-out individuals, entities and relationships and drawing meaning where I can, but these remain undeveloped.

Holding onto Sharma & Associates, Inc., let’s acknowledge the Indian heritage in the name and frame the balance of the conversation knowing what is outlined in the extract below sourced from Our Asian Times. We do this along with understanding that RAW’s (an Indiaian intelligence agency) emergence as a covert player in the U.S. draws-back on George W. Bush and 9/11. RAW becomes further enmeshed when it’s working relationship with Israel’s Mossad (common enemies) was augmented by then President Barack Obama’s “vitalizing the United States’ strategic alignment with India.” Even more concerning and from same source, Biden’s CIA Director William J. Burns was in place and credited for the “vitalizing the United States’ strategic alignment with India.”

As we draw this out, there isn’t much of a leap to make in thinking that Obama’s Indian realignment resulted in a working relationship with the relative agencies and departments: RAW working with the suite of appropriate U.S. entities – FBI, CIA, NSA, etc. Thinking that Sharma & Associates, Inc. may be a U.S. placed RAW asset is a very plausible scenario given that Sharma would be in a position to deliver the evidenced financials and otherwise to any third party, including intelligence principals. Remember how our government operates – they enlist allies to circumvent U.S. laws preventing them from doing what they’re tasking the enlisted allies for, which is always against regular Americans.

This is Sharma & Associates, Inc. and like Surfside’s page, information and details are minimal. Is this a shell?

Asking whether or not Sharma is a shell draws down on this, which is what I found when attempting to understand more about Sharma and its ownership. Searching for just ‘Sharma & Associates’ nets this.

Sharma appears to be owned by Tops Financial Services, LLC and recalling that it’s LLCs that own units in the collapsed tower. No evidence has been uncovered showing Sharma as a unit owner. This is Tops Financial Services, LLC and noting its “fictitious name” in Sharma & Associates.

If we latch onto Adam Birch, it takes us here and I know what you’ll be thinking – Koch? Me too. Cursory research does not indicate that these Kochs are the same as ‘the Koch family.’

This is Adam Birch.

If we latch onto Michael Hardy, we net this.

Here, we confirm the purchase of Sharma & Associates, Inc. by TOPS Financial in February.

With TOPS enveloping Sharma & Associates, Inc. and retaining Vishnu P. Sharma to place him as leading the financial services group, he becomes a very solid RAW asset relative to Surfside IF in fact this is the case and recalling that I’m just laying it out; not supporting it. In that capacity, it gives Sharma access to all of Sharma, all of TOPS and all of Mission Association Financial.

Staying latched to V.P. Sharma and Sharma & Associates but changing our search parameters to “Sharma & Associates, Inc.“, we net this and V.P. Sharma is named outright.

Now, watch how fast this turns into a rat’s nest just by latching onto A Thousand Years, LLC and we’re going to tug on the address.

250 companies with that one address? This is the shell game I advised of at the beginning of this mess and you can take this wee little example and reproduce it exponentially to really get a feel for how all of this shapes up and in complex ways that cause us to ask more questions than find answers.

We’re stopping here for brevity’s sake and to walk away from a full day’s work.

Everything outlined is open-ended and needs further development, but where are we reasonably?

What we know: unless the laws of physics ceased to exist on the day the condo collapsed, this is controlled demolition; that the run-up to the collapse is deeply rooted in factors that are hallmark fraud indicators; that the Biden administration is dipping its spoon into the pot to become the head chef; that the building collapsed between the start of work but before the expensive aspects; that the HOA and involved attorneys appear to assuming conflicting positions like the mayor and the town commissioner, and the latter is making the same arguments we are; that we how have a road map to follow; that there is plausibility to everything I’m outlining regarding the intelligence community angles and more; but most importantly, none of it can be called factual yet.


Confirmations From Federal Whistleblower Dr. Jonathan McGreevey – AKA John Here To Help

You may know him on the corrupt and censorship laden platform Twitter as @Johnheretohelp; however, the individual behind the curious pink pig is a federal whistleblower now identified as Dr. Johnathan McGreevey. McGreevey’s heritage, education, experience and resume make him central to all things including U.S. bio-warfare, COVID-19, compromised personnel within the DOJ and intelligence community, China/the CCP, and all of the corruption, crime and treason affiliated with the undoing of this once proud constitutional republic so that it may be handed over to the Globalist’s new tip of the spear, which is supplanting the old American tip – China.

McGreevey has been delivering the goods for sometime now and those of us at Moonshine have been consuming and sharing his content regularly for a couple of years. At this juncture and in conjunction with his Senate run, McGreevey is emerging from the shadows to be more visible and forward with his knowledge and evidence.

McGreevey’s decision to go public with his identity coincides with a clear picture that Americans are living through the deliberate destruction of the United States at the hands of China and a globalist cabal; and it has us all in the midst of an irregular, asymmetrical and undeclared third world war that few seem to recognize and the ones who do are mostly on the wrong side.

Moreover, recent air strikes ordered in Syria by the Chinese proxy Joe Biden have us on the brink of this war turning hot given that Syria has been our prognosticated spark to the powder keg for years.

I put it like this last night.

And if Syria isn’t a grand enough deflection point from the Arizona audit, perhaps it’s Surfside. As outlined in recent work, how is it that a Chinese-born, CCP cookie-cut-out premier attorney with a timely 2016 arrival is central to the law firm co-managing the long-time structurally compromised Champlain complex?

Much is going on right now and it has the waters churned-up; especially with the forensic audit results in Arizona hopefully reached and made public soon.

Digressing, our relationship with McGreevey here at Moonshine has a bit of a backdrop and I’ll share some of those details without telling you too much. It all draws down on this.