In September 2020, we latched onto Dr. Li-Meng Yan, an internal whistleblower who had defected from China and the Wuhan Institute of Virology vis-a-vis Hong Kong. You may remember that Dr. Yan mysteriously made the rounds on social media appearing in cryptic photographs alongside Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliani and Patrick Ho. We’ve previously covered Yan’s and Ho’s involvement deeply and extensively. That’s Bannon over Rudy’s right shoulder, Ho on his left and Yan in the mirror; and that opportunistic photograph is no accident and no coincidence while also being potentially devastating to the Chinese proxy Biden administration when we consider the collective body of knowledge therein.

This extract is from our 19 Sep 20 article and you can watch the Tucker segment and a previous Yan interview both of which are linked in the article and both of which are worthy of consumption. They provided significant backdrop to the developments were reporting on here.

More recently, we remarked on Yan’s situation relative to Matt Gaetz’s questioning of FBI Director Christopher Wray in our 16 Jun 21 article,

Simply stated, Gaetz wanted to know which side is the FBI on?

We learn that on 28 Apr 20, Chinese scientist Li-Men Yan landed at LAX where she was promptly interviewed by an FBI agent who then followed her to New York.

Simply stated, Gaetz wanted to know which side is the FBI on?

We learn that on 28 Apr 20, Chinese scientist Li-Men Yan landed at LAX where she was promptly interviewed by an FBI agent who then followed her to New York.

The FBI then arranged for interviews to take place on 01, 02 May 20 and moreover, the FBI seized her cell phone containing WeChat messages “between herself and the director of the CDC in Beijing” that dated back to December 2019 “regarding the Chinese military’s involvement in the development of the virus and specific links to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Director Wray, when did you become aware of your agency’s interface with Dr. Yan; when did you review those WeChat message?”

Gaetz continued to press Wray about the meeting relative to the origins of COVID-19 by asking for details of the 6-hour meeting. He further stated that “a year later” it was “simply unacceptable” for the FBI to possess little no traction relative to COVID-19.

Defaulting to the “specific investigations” position, Wray declined specific comments but elaborated on how the “intelligence community has been looking at this issue.”

Let’s all pause for one second to acknowledge that we’ve identified the overarching spine in this broader criminal and treasonous continuum as this very same intelligence community ergo in typical D.C. fashion, the violators appear to be investigating themselves. That’s a very old recipe to bake a good old-fashioned cover-up.

From the same article, we acknowledged the emergence of a second WIV whistleblower but with few details in hand, “It should also be noted and as we previously reported, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has been working exclusively with an internal WIV Chinese whistleblower it has kept sequestered from other agencies and departments. Yan is thought to be likely able to corroborate the accounts of this whistleblower who remains unnamed.”

It goes without saying that the DIA’s prerogative to keep the whistleblower sequestered from other agencies and departments is fundamental to our understanding of the entire “pandemic” and our established and often exclusive positions which read like conspiracy but manifest as reality.

Holding our attention today are two new developments; one posted at Zero Hedge and the other at the National Pulse. We’ll begin with the National Pulse item by Natalie Winters and it’s direct and simple, “The Wuhan Institute of Virology – increasingly believed to be the source for the SARS CoV-2 coronavirus – obtained “all the genes to make a SARS coronavirus similar to the epidemic strain,” according to a 2017 report by Science News.”

At this juncture and relative to that, it’s imperative to recall how the U.S. became aware of its own internal whistleblowers germane to prohibited gain of function research (bio-weaponization) and in late 2014, it began the process of off-shoring the work to the WIV with a co-issued memo from Lisa Monaco at Department of Homeland Security that served as a false flag construct to envelop all U.S. bio-containment facilities in a “security stand down.” Think of it as using the stand down to hide in the wide open while securing these labs amongst all labs. The off-shoring to the WIV took place in 2015-2016 and we outlined it all exclusively in Dangerously Changing Inconvenient Rules.

Our established timeline of roughly 2014 and moving into 2017, by which time the WIV was fully operational relative to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the genome sequence required to bio-engineer (bio-weaponize) it for its intended purpose, bears down with full might. We should also recall that initially, China put forth an deliberately incorrect genome sequence. Why? Rhetorical question.

In review, it’s 2017 that holds our attention and specifically the date of 13 Jan 17 – the precise moment that the outgoing Obama administration leveraged an 18 Mar 16 Obama executive order (Public Law 114-136) to augment longstanding presidential transition law so as to include “pandemic preparedness.” Why? Rhetorical question.

Roughly and exclusively, January 2017 is the most important timeline in contemporary U.S. history.

Now consider the totality of what’s been delineated in light of the reporting from Winters that China was in possession of all requisite genes to facilitate bio-weaponizing SARS-CoV-2 and they possessed them by 2017. The same 2017 that is identified as the most important timeline in contemporary U.S. history.

As a former fraud investigator, I don’t believe in coincidences; especially when they stack up in spades over long timelines and offer overlaps that can’t otherwise be explained. Timing and timeline overlays are lethal weapons and they couldn’t be more lethal than they are here. We talked about their impact more recently in Undo COVID-19 by Pressing the Predication ‘Easy Button’ relative ripping out the predicate for the 11 Mar 20 national emergency declaration as a means of “undoing” COVID-19.

Building on our foundation as it rests, let’s introduce our second item as featured at Zero Hedge and as sourced from Jennifer Van Laar at Red State. In it, we get confirmation of the second internal WIV whistleblower who is being sequestered away from corrupt agencies and departments by the DIA and his actual identity.

Like Yan, Chinese Vice Minister of State Security Dong Jingwei, defected vis-a-vis Hong Kong and he brought with him a tranche of evidentiary documents relative to SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. In his position, Dong oversaw counterintelligence efforts in China. From Red State,

Dong is, or was, a longtime official in China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS), also known as the Guoanbu. His publicly available background indicates that he was responsible for the Ministry’s counterintelligence efforts in China, i.e., spy-catching, since being promoted to vice minister in April 2018. If the stories are true, Dong would be the highest-level defector in the history of the People’s Republic of China.

Dong’s mid-February arrival essentially went unnoticed occurring beneath the dark cloud of the stolen election, the constructed Capitol “insurrection” event, the inauguration of an illegitimately installed and Chinese proxy Joe Biden, and the second fraudulent impeachment. Four months later, we have more clarity and more hope for good eventually prevailing.

Dong arrived in California contacting DIA officials upon landing and advising them of his intentions to defect and present his tranche of evidence. For two weeks, he “hid in plain sight” before DIA placed him in protective custody.

Van Laar confirms the nature of Dong’s evidence.

Here, we latch on to specific confirmations relative to our overarching work at Moonshine: 1) early pathogenic studies of SARS-CoV-2, 2) U.S. (and other) modeling of SARS-CoV-2, 3) U.S. funding of gain of function work stateside and in China, 4) involvement of U.S. agencies and organizations writ large, 5) gain of function research (bio-weaponization), 6) compromised U.S. individuals conspiring with China, 7) complicity by U.S. universities and professors, departments, etc., 8) evidence of broader biowarfare programs, 9) Chinese students in America working as “spies” for China, 10) Chinese funding to U.S. individuals in business and government, 11) entanglements in meetings with China and Russia, 12) China’s compromise and killing of intelligence assets working inside China.

To the fraud investigator experienced in investigating cases and establishing them to requisite legal thresholds, it’s as simple as it is complex. It’s simple in this sense and you can write this down for future reference – save the bluster over conspiracy theories, COVID-19 is demonstrably fraudulent by admissibility standards in a court of law.

The forthcoming class action will be as immeasurable as it is unprecedented but that is irrelevant until the move to an impartial court or similar is achieved. Until then, we shall continue to hold onto a mountain of irrefutable and reliable evidence and the hope that President Trump left in his wake a plan to ensure that wrongs are righted and that good prevails.

-End-

BONUS ITEM