Did President Obama Turn His 2009 Insurgency Doctrine Against America?

30 Apr 20 (THIRTY-THIRD article in a series).

In 2009, Barack Obama was historically inaugurated as the nation’s first African-American President and as he entered office, he did so with sights set on a doctrine of counterinsurgency as outlined in his administration’s US Government Guide to Counterinsurgency (2009.) With the levels of corruption and criminality demonstrated by Obama over the course his two anti-American presidential terms, it is reasonable to ask whether this president turned his own counterinsurgency strategy against the United States itself. A quick glimpse at today’s headlines – topics that the Q folks have been privy to for years – tells us we’re likely on the mark and that the evidence exists to demonstrate it.

The Mason Jar
</> Examination of President Obama’s 2009 Insurgency Doctrine
</> Consideration as to whether President Obama leveraged his own doctrine on insurgency as the blueprint for infiltrating the United States
</> Presentation of evidence supporting claims
</> Qanon drop #4008

With this series of articles now eclipsing thirty, I have to leave it to new readers to catch-up mostly on their own. The subject matter here is just too deep, entangled and encompassing to recapitulate it with each new article.

If you are new please consider seeing HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom: hypothesis, team update, disclaimers, graphics and timeline.

*The graphics are very helpful in consuming large quantities of information succinctly.

Rules for Radicals

Later on Wednesday, Qanon posted the linked guide along with several extracts from it, which we will dig into looking for contemporaneous evidence in support. In the even that time allows for it, we’ll take a deeper dive into the 67-page document but for now, we’ll focus on what was outlined for us.

Here is the first extract:

Irregular warfare is far more varied than conventional conflict: hence the importance of an intellectual framework that is coherent enough to provide guidance, and flexible enough to adapt to circumstances.

Irregular warfare is the Left’s favorite topic and we can look to the Obama/Clinton bible for their playbook in Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. From Penguin Random House,

“First published in 1971, Rules for Radicals is Saul Alinsky’s impassioned counsel to young radicals on how to effect constructive social change and know “the difference between being a realistic radical and being a rhetorical one.” Written in the midst of radical political developments whose direction Alinsky was one of the first to question, this volume exhibits his style at its best. Like Thomas Paine before him, Alinsky was able to combine, both in his person and his writing, the intensity of political engagement with an absolute insistence on rational political discourse and adherence to the American democratic tradition.”

Look and sound familiar? It should.

One prominent manifestation of Alinsky’s work, in terms of it interfacing with the American public in tangible ways, is the ‘social justice’ agenda whereby the disaffected ascribe to a victim status of choice and then engage in infighting to determine the biggest victim, the largest extension of entitlement and the greatest degree of off-set from contemporary society and traditional norms. That last point is the haymaker and it’s a simple concept.

The social justice agenda functions by throwing-out emotional hooks contextually social (sexual identity, sexual preference, racism, sexual harassment, etc.) and luring people in with heartfelt angles. Once people are on board, those sentiments are then leveraged to move people towards unrelated politically desirable positions. These people are often called “useful idiots” because they only see (or at least advance) their political position through one lens – social justice.

Social justice functions to drive the narrative as far left as possible and upon societal reconciliation, when things subsequently center-up on the back end of a social stimulus as they always do, the middle ground fulcrum point – or center position – will have been nudged left by means of the American public reconciling their own individual sentiments and emotions. This often results in small shifts in personal positions and the net effect over time is a slow but steady change in America’s societal fabric rendering leftward movement.

A perfect contemporaneous example is one that I see about daily in the context of public education (depending on your state of residency) – girls whom say (identify) that they are boys being permitted by law to use the boys restroom and vice versa. A couple of decades ago, that would have been a California thing (first law circa 1987) but today it’s the law in most states. That’s what happens when your local government (school board) is infiltrated and overtaken by people whom are organized, have numbers, have a plan and have motivation (ask the folks in Boise, ID.) It’s akin to deteriorating vision – you don’t realize it has diminished (or that you’ve been infiltrated) until you try on a friend’s new frames and immediately learn that you, too, need glasses (or that your hometown now resembles Berkley.)

Obama’s Greatest Weapon

Here’s the second extract.

American counterinsurgency practice rests on a number of assumptions: that the decisive effort is rarely military (although security is the essential prerequisite for success); that our efforts must be directed to the creation of local and national governmental structures that will serve their populations, and, over time, replace the efforts of foreign partners; that superior knowledge, and in particular, understanding of the ‘human terrain’ is essential; and that we must have the patience to persevere in what will necessarily prove long struggles.

What was Obama’s greatest weapon? What is the one thing that he had that was different, better and more highly effective than virtually any other president before him and to be honest, since? And I’m not talking about his enormous foreign, domestic, unconstitutional and illegal spying operation which is currently feeling the full scrutiny of the USDOJ.

It is Obama’s oratory prowess. The man could sell ice to Eskimos in the middle of a blizzard; he could charm a snake charmer. The man can orate with supreme competence and it makes him absolutely lethal as a politico in the trade statecraft.

Every president has a military but the military is not a viable mode as Alinsky notes. Obama’s skills as an orator are what made him so destructively successful in his two terms, which were rooted in pushing anti-American legislation and policy by means of coercion and the leveraging of emotions and rhetoric. Alinskyites like Obama have essentially programmed much of the American public to park their brains in lief of “thinking” with their hearts. It’s had devastating effects on the country and by design.

We’d be remiss in not recognizing that in-part what made Obama so popular in the literal sense is that he received (and continues to receive) strict allegiance and devotion from a complicit and disingenuous mainstream media. It is also absolutely critical to understand that the same power brokers whom pulled on Obama’s puppet strings are the same ones pulling on the MSM’s. The MSM didn’t report on Obama rather they delivered canned talking points and narrative to boost his image against the backdrop of un-American legislation and policy. In other words, they sold him like the mainstream and Hollywood sells all of their idols and icons. That package deal was unbelievable formidable as we can now all see.

It’s not that much different today, really. It’s just that the sentiment is reversed. The media is really no more robust now than they were then. All they’ve done is flip the switch to reverse the flow from adoration towards Obama to pure hatred for Mr. Trump. It’s still the same horse shit – it just smells different.

Federalism Cuts Both Ways

The following represents examples of evidence whereby Obama’s actions and decisions began to parallel what we’d expect to see if the insurgency donctrine’s principles were pragmatically mapped on to the United States. This evidence is sourced from a Govering.com article circa 2016 and it’s written from a left leaning perspective on Obama’s dealings with Federalism, which is at the heart of the matter here just as it is in the reopening of the country. As you know there is a developing standoff between federal priorities and directives and resistant Democratic states relative to the easing of guidelines.

-In May 2009, Obama issued an executive order discouraging federal agencies from enacting regulations that would preempt state laws (giving states greater latitude, which contributes to the aforementioned developing standoff.)

-In 2009, Obama recruited governors to head the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services, and chose a Republican governor as his ambassador to China. State officials were named to head the Environmental Protection Agency and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

-Obama’s law gave more than a third of the spending to states, originally pegged at $787 billion, whereby it went to the state or through the state government.

Obama’s stimulus package created momentum whereby the president could fiscally grease the skids of struggling states and coerce them to adopt his policies in exchange for cold hard cash. Consider this from Governing.com,

“The best-known example was Race to the Top, a contest among states to get a share of $4.35 billion in federal school funding. The catch was that, to stand a good chance of getting this money, states had to adopt education policies that the Obama administration backed, such as expanding charter schools, linking teacher and principal evaluations to student performance, and adopting common curriculums (sic).”

“The stimulus provided a lifeline for states awash in red ink following the recession, primarily by giving them money for Medicaid and schools. The law offered additional funds to help states extend unemployment benefits, and helped pay for infrastructure improvements that included broadband, high-speed rail, bridge repairs and road repaving.”

Again from our source article,

“The stimulus marked the first time since President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, which included contests for municipalities to distinguish themselves as “model cities,” that a president had used state and local competitions so extensively. The Obama administration would return to them time and time again.

Moreover,

“When Obama couldn’t get his agenda through Congress, he relied more heavily on federal agencies. When Republican states were hesitant to help, Obama turned to Democratic governors, local leaders, or whoever was willing to help him make changes. “The policy goals,” Dinan says, “will generally prevail.””

Now contrast everything above against verbiage from the federal guide. In order to do that, I’ve inserted the analog or other in (parentheses) for context.

“that our efforts (Obama’s) must be directed to the creation of local and national (state) governmental structures that will serve their populations, and, over time, replace the efforts of foreign partners (replace the local/state agenda as determined by the constituents in that locale); that superior knowledge (Obama knows best as supported by intelligence and what has been learned from real insurgency operations on foreign soil), and in particular, understanding of the ‘human terrain’ (straight-up psychological warfare/propaganda/social programming/mass manipulation, etc.) is essential; and that we must have the patience (long-term plan with short-terming timing relevant to now) to persevere in what will necessarily prove long struggles (which are now coming to an end as the plan manifests in its final stages).”

One and the same, no? Did Obama take the lessons that the American military learned in insurgency operations abroad and turn them against the United States to infiltrate its government?

America is the Ultimately Ripe Modern Environment

Here is the third extract.

Insurgency, however, can and will flourish in the modern environment. The strains created by globalization, by the collapse of weak state structures, by demographic, environmental, and economic pressures, by the ease of cooperation among insurgent groups and criminals, and by the appearance of destructive radical ideologies, all augur a period in which free and moderate governance is at risk.

That Obama’s doctrine on insurgency claims that it “can and will flourish in the modern environment” ought to have the hair on everyone’s neck standing on end. Obama not only acknowledged the strains created by his Globalist positions, he leveraged them toward political ends; as the doctrine elaborates on areas like demographics (race baiting and sown social division/social justice agenda), environmental (Paris Climate Accord and mandated federal regulations), economic (the totality of Obama’s economic policies where detrimental to the US at a wholesale level) and cooperating insurgent groups (Antifa, for one.)

Insurgency Accomplishes Infiltration

This last bit is the opening paragraph from the Executive Summary contained in the original document and Q posted it in full. We’ll break it up and briefly comment accordingly as we wrap-up all of this. Again, inserts in (parentheses) are mine.

“Insurgency is the organized use of subversion and violence to seize, nullify or challenge political control of a region (states and cities). As such, it is primarily a political struggle, in which both sides use armed force (leveraging law enforcement at all levels [try to go play with your kids in a public park – that’s local police saying no, not federal]) to create space for their political, economic and influence activities to be effective. Insurgency is not always conducted by a single group with a centralized, military-style command structure, but may involve a complex matrix of different actors with various aims, loosely connected in dynamic and non-hierarchical networks (network of cities and states.)”

Does not that resemble what Obama instituted with his local and state outreach efforts as propelled by Trillions in federal stimulus dollars; with 1/3 of it flowing directly to or through the states? That he placed caveats (must implement his policies) to receive said funds?

For Obama to leverage the doctrine’s principles against the US at least two things would have to happen: a) he would have to development of a pragmatic framework for operating and leveraging the federal apparatus and its authority and power and b) he would need a certain number of States to be on-board at best and co-opted or leveraged at worst. Getting them all would never be possible but if you can get the lion’s share, the full weight of a plurality of states plus the federal apparatus against the remaining states is an untenable and losing situation.

It’s important to note here that Obama’s continued strategy, just as he recruited governors early in his first term, took the form of recruiting the mayors from many of America’s finest cities as his partners. For much of his second term, those were his pawns. A quick COVID-19 sidebar as we all sit at home, gubernatorial and mayoral control have never been more important than they are that this precise moment in history, have they? Is that by happenstance or by design?

Interestingly, although Obama was intent on exploiting Federalism to achieve objectives, he was also required to defend against it in his approaches. Most things cut both ways in statecraft. So, to answer the earlier question is yes, there is a resemblance in both form and function that Obama mapped his insurgency doctrine onto the United States.

Recalling what was stated earlier about Obama’s oratory prowess, consider this, which speaks for itself.

“To be successful, insurgencies require charismatic leadership, supporters, recruits, supplies, safe havens and funding (often from illicit activities).”

When you see “recruits” and as someone whom is intimately familiar with the field, I’d encourage you to take a very long, hard look at the indoctrination process that occurs within the majority of public educational institutions. The curricula therein are loaded with revisionist history and social justice and political correctness objective. In many ways they are antithetical to most traditional and Conservative values and principles.

If things weren’t nefarious enough, the remaining aspects of this are chilling comparatively speaking to what we have learned and are learning about Obama’s two terms.

“They only need the active support of a few enabling individuals, but the passive acquiescence of a large proportion of the contested population will give a higher probability of success. This is best achieved when the political cause of the insurgency has strong appeal, manipulating religious, tribal or local identity to exploit common societal grievances or needs.”

Let’s just translate this third point as follows – To be successful, Obama only needs a few active supporters who can function as enabling individuals (think of all the politicians and others on the Left whom pander to victims and special interest groups) because the majority of the population will just accept what is being forced down their throats. That’s what it means to acquiesce and when that happens, laws are enacted that go against the grain of the majority of the public (there’s nothing more important than each individual American’s fidelity to civic responsibility.) It’s most effective with the aforementioned emotional hook that allows for people to be herded into political positions.

Insurgents seek to gain control of populations through a combination of persuasion, subversion and coercion while using guerrilla tactics to offset the strengths of government security forces. Their intent is usually to protract the struggle, exhaust the government and win sufficient popular support to force capitulation or political accommodation. Consequently, insurgencies evolve through a series of stages, though the progression and outcome will be different in almost every case.

Again, let’s just translate – the government that Obama instituted and which the President is attempting to undo, desired to control all of us by persuading us, subverting us and coercing us whereby resistance was/is met with a heavy hammer (just ask Roger Stone and his wife – that was essentially the same holdover folks.) By dragging-out struggles over a long timeline, Obama’s tactics sought to run the government so ragged that popular support derived from lies and manipulation (see definitions for persuasion, subversion and coercion) would ultimately be the vehicle to usher-in political capitulation also known as giving-in to his demands. The result was the disastrous 8 years of law and policy he produced.

Before we go, let’s quickly evaluate Obama’s accomplishments against Alinsky’s eight requisites for instituting a Socialist state:

Healthcare – check: Obamacare
Poverty – check: Poverty increased across the board for most
Debt – check: Debt increased across the board for most
Gun control – check: this is a never-ending battle
Welfare – check: Welfare was at historic levels
Education – check: Education was hi-jacked by the Left long ago
Religion – check: Attacks on Christianity and religious freedom concerns have risen
Class warfare – check: Simply log on to Facebook or Twitter, they have us at each others’ throats

That’s what you call batting a thousand AND IT NEVER HAPPENS – EVER. What does that tell you?

Again, this is a veneer level dig into whether former President Obama leveraged his own doctrine toward insurgency against the United States with aims on infiltration. With confidence though, it’s reasonable to believe that the evidence demonstrates that’s exactly what Obama did and it’s is likely why Qanon posted the link and chose those particular extracts.

The days and weeks to come will be compelling; if not historic. Enjoy.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

Contents: Hypothesis, Team Update, Disclaimer, QAnon disclaimer, Timeline, Graphics

*Please find related graphics and images and the timeline at the bottom.

*If you are brand new, there are two recommendations as to where to begin catching-up and they are posted at the very bottom – one shorter than the other.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update/Team: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group. This team receives quite a bit of valuable information from the folks who read our articles and accordingly, we (I) give a special heartfelt hat tip to @Shazlandia, whom keeps me on my toes at all times; often inconveniencing herself to do it.

DisclaimerThis has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon Disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

A Word on Intent: There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

Where to Start Catching-up: I have two shortcuts for new readers looking to catch-up and avoid reading from article one. The ninth article – IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW – served as a recapitulation as of 14 Mar 20. Alternatively, you could take a bigger shortcut and pick-up with CAUSE OF DEATH FOR SALE posted 12 Apr 20.

IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW

CAUSE OF DEATH – FOR SALE

CATALOG

VIDEO

CUE TO 2:00 – DR. ANTHONY FAUCI IN JAN. 2017 STATING TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WOULD FACE AN UNEXPECTED DISEASE OUTBREAK IN THE CONTEXT OF PANDEMIC RESPONSE

GRAPHICS

FIGURE 1: Underlying premise/manipulating infection data to drive false narrative
FIGURE 2: Elaboration on underlying premise in Fig. 1
FIGURE 3: Excerpts from relevant headlines in support of hypothesis and underlying premise
FIGURE 4: Analysis of article authored by Bill Gates on 28 Feb 20
FIGURE 5: “Fraud” begins to emerge in the subtext of the MSM relative to COVID-19
FIGURE 6: Graphic outlining suspicious deaths related to COVID-19
FIGURE 7: Curious word choice and messaging one month before presidential transition meetings on 13 Jan 17
FIGURE 8: Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program) position posted with open dates of 15 Nov 19 – 05 May 20 (Note: 1st US: 20 Jan 20, initial/original Wuhan outbreak: 27 Dec 19 [revised back to 17 Nov 19], FBI knowledge of outbreak: October 2019)
FIGURE 9: Early NYC fatalities reflecting underlying conditions component
FIGURE 10: ‘Event 201’ information
FIGURE 11: Historically anomalous drop-off in pneumonia deaths 2019-2020
FIGURE 12: $171 million increase in funding form US to WHO on the established 2016-2017 timeline
FIGURE 13: Bill Gates purchased the CDC like he did the WHO – with funding
FIGURE 14: Image grab of the 13 Nov 19 FBI Tactical Intelligence Report/Bio-weapons & WMDD
FIGURE 15: Historic employment number eviscerated
FIGURE 16: Mortality and infection rates dependent upon age and underlying conditions
FIGURE 17: NYT’s reporting representative of false narrative propagating a fear message; data is mitigated exponentially by updated statistics and numbers
FIGURE 18: Dr. Stephen Smith’s data regarding underlying conditions
FIGURE 19: COVID-19 image presented by QAnon
FIGURE 20: NVSS memo shaping nationwide “liberal approach” (Birx) to diagnosis and cause of death declarations

13 JAN 17 PANDEMIC CONSTRUCT INSERTION

Figures 21-26: Leaked slides from the pandemic scenario insertion on 13 Jan 17 during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings:

FIGURE 21: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 22: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 23: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 24: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 25: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 26: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 27: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 28: “This is Bill Gates”
FIGURE 29: Image Catherine Herridge/Techno Fog Steele dossier FBI sub-source verified dossier as disinformation 12 Jan 17 (SOURCE)
FIGURE 30: Just some baseless self-promotion to bolster the spirit…..

TIMELINE

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

-2016-
13 Mar: Obama Executive order/Public Law 113-146 Presidential Transition

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2018-
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

Drink your Moonshine…

It’s good for the TRUTH.

Three Dark Days of Obama Devastation Delivered COVID-19

28 Apr 20 (THIRTY-SECOND article in a series).

It was inauguration day and the date was 20 Jan 17. The United States of America was standing on the precipice of an historically unfathomable political transition. It was a literal upheaval; a moment that would be considered transformative for posterity’s sake; and not only for those of us with more traditional American leanings and looking for a return to Conservative American principles and values, but for the country as a whole.

The Mason Jar
</> Concise examination of broader timeline excerpt
</> 3 Dark Days of Obama Devastation: 11, 12, 13 Jan 17
</> False flag political construct relying on manipulated data
</> Impeachment as cover for COVID-19 construct
</> Overlap of other Trump resistance components: Steele dossier, Flynn, Carter Page, FISA, China, bioweapons smuggling, Harvard

With this series of articles now eclipsing thirty, I have to leave it to new readers to catch-up mostly on their own. The subject matter here is just too deep, entangled and encompassing to recapitulate it with each new article.

If you are new please consider seeing HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom: hypothesis, team update, disclaimers, graphics and timeline.

*The graphics are very helpful in consuming large quantities of information succinctly.

A Permanent Stain on Dignity and Tradition

It was supposed to be a moment underpinned by a collective sense of dignity, tradition and respect for the rule of law. A moment where the full weight of American leadership and its inherent and absolute power and authority would be earnestly, proudly and respectfully; but most importantly, peacefully, transferred from the outgoing Obama administration to Trump’s incoming one. It’s this unique tradition that sets America apart from all other nations. It’s emblematic of what makes America and her resolute and effective global leadership indispensable to the balance of the globe. That is, unless, the outgoing administration has different designs – designs that sought to transform the nation not in a capacity seen fit by its newly elected president in Mr. Trump, but by unelected bureaucrats embedded deep within the murky federal apparatus and held-over from Obama’s Deep State.

Three Dark Days and Timelines

Over the course of three dreary, dark and devastating days, then President Obama made decisions and took actions to set the country on the most destructive course in American history and all by design. Today we focus on the fateful days of January 11th, 12th and 13th, 2017. That January 13th happened to be a Friday sets the ominous and foreboding tone appropriately.

If you’ve read my work as supported by our team at Political Moonshine, you know that I focus heavily on timing and timelines. As a former US History teacher, I had a brilliant professor in college whom trained me impeccably in the value and use of timelines. They say so much. They tie past events to future ones. They give meaning and relevance to linked events that otherwise appear to be disassociated. They can represent buried gold if you know how and where to dig and what questions to ask; but like anything else, it’s a practice that improves with refinement over time.

Messaging Signals Intent and Actions Reflect on It

This is Maxine Waters a mere three months following President Trump’s inauguration or in other words, exactly 85 days after the President began a 1,460-day term. Enjoy the buffoonery from this bona fide moron but we’re watching it to make a point:

That was nothing new – she and they were talking about impeaching him before he was even inaugurated so why would they diverge from that message since it was already so clearly established? Well, this is politics and therefore they wouldn’t. The question then becomes why is their message so particularly anti-American, hateful and vitriolic? Why is it so extreme and disproportionate to what should be routine partisan differences?

Partisan Politics is for the Ignorant Masses

For anyone thinking that the collective response leveled against this President’s 2016 win in any way comports with standard, run-of-the-mill, election year politics, please brush-up on your history. What President Trump has faced in terms of the opposition he’s fought is unprecedented by any standard. Never has an American President found himself where Mr. Trump is today. So, why? Why is that?

Here’s why. First, you can eliminate anything that resembles partisan politics. Partisan politics, which for the Left has devolved into this amalgam of conglomerated victims all infighting to be worse off than the other as buoyed by fake and made-up “social justice” and entitlement mindset programming, is nothing more than the horse shit that greases the skids. Not to be mean but if you don’t get that, you get what you deserve.

Partisan politics is kabuki theater to keep the minions and peons distracted from the real show, which is the quest for absolute power, authority, dominance, wealth, tyranny and control – and for Globalists, that’s all on a global scale. Understand that stateside, Obama still runs point for this criminal cabal that has hijacked our government. As for US partisan politics, though? It’s irrelevant. This is all about the aforementioned quest as much as it is this cabal’s efforts toward self-preservation in a broad scope of criminality.

Bringing Obama’s Treason and Sedition into Focus

To understand the magnitude of everything to be discussed, we’re compelled to revisit this quote from a piece I wrote on 17 Mar 20,

It was on this date, 18 Mar 16, that PUBLIC LAW 114-136 was passed. So then, what does this law do and WHY would an OUTGOING ADMINISTRATION, one whereby if we are honestly speaking, would want to see the incoming administration promptly fall flat on its face and fumble it’s way through nearly four years of designed and orchestrated obstruction and resistance, seek to augment existing law? WHY would it not seek to aid and assist said incoming administration earnestly?

First, realize this. With almost near certainty, internal polling likely informed the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton had no chance of winning the 2016 election in the months ahead. Heck, to know this all you had to do was look at the complete dearth of audience and following that she had at all of her campaign events and recalling that she essentially refused to hold any (Hillary napped through campaign season.) To the contrary, candidate Trump’s crowd sizes were akin to what we see today. Just like we know right now that the Democrats are dead in the water for 2020, it is virtually guaranteed that they knew they were dead in the water for 2016 when they passed this law on 18 Mar 16. So then, WHY did they pass it? That’s a rhetorical question.

Obama’s administration was knowledgeable of the fact that they (Hillary) stood no chance of winning a legitimate election in 2016, but this wasn’t a legitimate election; rather it was a rigged one. Despite this, these are smart folks whom always have contingency plans and effective contingency plans are best pre-assembled and lying in wait. COVID-19 was an ongoing contingency plan readying for deployment as relegated to the impeachment timeline, as I outlined roughly a month ago (it’s what folks are now stealing and reading aloud as their own intellectual property in certain podcasts.)

As best I can tell, absolutely no one has been able to explain Pelosi’s rush/halt, erratic management of the impeachment except, of course, us. She rushed to cram it in before Christmas calling for the full House vote on 18 Dec 19 and then refused to transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate until 15 Jan 20? Why? She was calibrating the timing of the cover scheme – impeachment (distraction, diversion, etc.) – to the timing associated with readying COVID-19 for deployment. Look how squarely the first outbreak date in Wuhan was situated – 27 Dec 19.

That date would later be revised backwards to 17 Nov 19, but notably, it still precedes an October 2019 timeline for which there exists a FBI Technical Intelligence Report giving the FBI advance notice of a China coronavirus outbreak potentially impacting national security a solid two months before Trump’s DOD was made aware. Nancy Pelosi as an ex officio member of the HPSCI and was privy to this sort of intelligence yet during this same time frame and long before she encouraged folks to visit Chinatown during the midst of the US outbreak, she chose to drive a phony impeachment scam rather than act on this information. Oh and one more thing, that intelligence report had an ancillary intelligence report marked FISA that was attached to it. Yeah, FISA.

Why didn’t the FBI meet its national security onus in informing the DOD? Anything to do with that FISA classification and the fact the Chinese nationals were caught multiple times smuggling bioweapons in/out of the US along with Professor Charles Lieber and Harvard University? Do you think that the associations between Lieber, Harvard, China, Fauci, Birx, Gates, Soros, Obama, Clinton, Biden, Pelosi and other Democrats establish enough substantive overlap for said FISA marker to pertain to the same FISA fraud associated with the President? Is that why the FBI failed in it’s obligation to inform the DOD of the national security implication posed by the threat of the October 2019 outbreak about which they were privy?

We’ve strayed from the heart of the matter, but those details are important for context as you can see. In fact they are subsequent to our discussion here so let’s refocus on Public Law 114-136, which was a unilateral Executive Order, and what it did (from the same source),

(iii) prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.

This single line above from the Obama Executive Order is the legal mechanism to insert the false flag political construct into the Trump administration and contextually, it was a viral pandemic, which we now call COVID-19. You can see copies of the slides from the presentation in the Housekeeping Items below.

Understand how this executive order functions relative to the COVID-19 construct and it’s all tied to presidential competence. Since the context of the construct – virology, epidemiology and pandemic response – comprises outlier areas for the President, he is legally compelled to consult with teams of experts in the exercising of his emergency powers in accordance with the Stafford Act, which became applicable upon the President’s national emergency declaration on 11 Mar 20. AS SOON AS THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WAS DECLARED THE CONSTRUCT IN-PLAY WAS GALVANIZED.

At that moment, the President’s emergency powers were usurped by Deep State Obama holdovers Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx. Re-read that if you need to because it doesn’t get more important. Look at where we are now relative to what I just said – sitting at home, stuck and with the economy shut down and in shambles. Re-read it again if you need to – it doesn’t get more important that that.

This brings us to the crux of our discussion today as we examine a flurry of nefarious decisions and actions all converging on a three-day timeline I’ve painted as the three dark days of devastation that delivered COVID-19.

-2016-

18 Mar: Obama enacted Executive Order/Public Law 113-146 changing Kennedy-era law so as to augment the process and include pandemic preparedness into transitional meetings.

-2017-

2017: Obama makes an apparent exception to existing policy by allowing Fauci to fund at $3.7m coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab expected of leaking the virus (SOURCE.)

Jan. ’17: Obama increases funding by $171m to the WHO as funded and controlled by Bill Gates and China (soured in housekeeping.)

Jan ’17: Obama sought funding cuts at the CDC, which would effectively interfere with pandemic preparedness and response (SOURCE): fiscal year 2015, $414 million cut year-over-year; fiscal year 2017 budget, looked to eliminate $251 million in CDC funding.

Jan ’17: The period of time Christopher Steele states that he deleted all of his Russian dossier files and contents

10 Jan: Buzzfeed publishes fraudulent Steel dossier tying back to John Brennan and his decision to launder the phone intelligence report by including it in the President’s Daily Brief, thus giving the suspected fraudulent dossier false instant credibility in the MSM.

11 Jan: Dr. Fauci publicly stated, “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

12 Jan: The Carter Page FISA warrant was set to expire and required renewal

12 Jan: FBI verified via its sub-source that Steele dossier was fraudulent and was comprised of Russian disinformation (SOURCE), thus eliminating their primary predication for initial impeachment and any warrants to which the dossier may have been attached.

13 Jan: Earlier: MSM coordinated the leak of fraudulent Flynn/Russia so as to preempt the presidential transition meetings in which Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn was a participant

13 Jan: Later: Insertion point for the false flag viral pandemic political construct as occurring during compulsory and legally augmented Obama/Trump presidential transition meetings; thrust Fauci, Birx & WHO into roles.


What this represents is a small aspect of a much broader and entangled timeline. We’re focusing even more narrowly on the dates of 11 Jan-13 Jan while giving contextual consideration to the events both preceding and subsequent to that span.

What did we learn? We learned that a) John Brennan set the stage with the leaked Buzzfeed dossier, which ties back to the PDB inclusion, thus establishing the entry point for the needed cover for the COVID-19 construct deployment – impeachment, b) that Dr. Fauci, had somehow predicted a viral pandemic that he himself said would be a “surprise disease outbreak,” c) that Christopher Steele had destroyed all of his evidence and that evidence was as bogus as the FBI’s own sub-source said it was, d) that Carter Page’s warrant was expiring, e) that above all else, time was quickly expiring and within 7 days from 13 Jan 17 – the day the construct was inserted – Obama and the Globalists would soon be deprived of the levers of power associated with the Oval Office and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, f) that President Obama was intent on making sure he still had influence with his newly usurped powers courtesy of Fauci and Birx.

Obama either acted out of gross incompetence, which we all know to be patently not the case, he did so or out of gross criminality; the level of which arises to treason and sedition.

It now seems that over the course of three dark days in January 2017 and just before he completed his second term, then President Obama embarked on a path of devastation that delivered the COVID-19 false flag political construct and changed America forever.

Let’s see how that works out for him.

*Please consider sharing and posting for posterity’s sake.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

Contents: Hypothesis, Team Update, Disclaimer, QAnon disclaimer, Timeline, Graphics

*Please find related graphics and images and the timeline at the bottom.

*If you are brand new, there are two recommendations as to where to begin catching-up and they are posted at the very bottom – one shorter than the other.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update/Team: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group. This team receives quite a bit of valuable information from the folks who read our articles and accordingly, we (I) give a special heartfelt hat tip to @Shazlandia, whom keeps me on my toes at all times; often inconveniencing herself to do it.

DisclaimerThis has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon Disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

A Word on Intent: There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

Where to Start Catching-up: I have two shortcuts for new readers looking to catch-up and avoid reading from article one. The ninth article – IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW – served as a recapitulation as of 14 Mar 20. Alternatively, you could take a bigger shortcut and pick-up with CAUSE OF DEATH FOR SALE posted 12 Apr 20.

IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW

CAUSE OF DEATH – FOR SALE

CATALOG

GRAPHICS

FIGURE 1: Underlying premise/manipulating infection data to drive false narrative
FIGURE 2: Elaboration on underlying premise in Fig. 1
FIGURE 3: Excerpts from relevant headlines in support of hypothesis and underlying premise
FIGURE 4: Analysis of article authored by Bill Gates on 28 Feb 20
FIGURE 5: “Fraud” begins to emerge in the subtext of the MSM relative to COVID-19
FIGURE 6: Graphic outlining suspicious deaths related to COVID-19
FIGURE 7: Curious word choice and messaging one month before presidential transition meetings on 13 Jan 17
FIGURE 8: Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program) position posted with open dates of 15 Nov 19 – 05 May 20 (Note: 1st US: 20 Jan 20, initial/original Wuhan outbreak: 27 Dec 19 [revised back to 17 Nov 19], FBI knowledge of outbreak: October 2019)
FIGURE 9: Early NYC fatalities reflecting underlying conditions component
FIGURE 10: ‘Event 201’ information
FIGURE 11: Historically anomalous drop-off in pneumonia deaths 2019-2020
FIGURE 12: $171 million increase in funding form US to WHO on the established 2016-2017 timeline
FIGURE 13: Bill Gates purchased the CDC like he did the WHO – with funding
FIGURE 14: Image grab of the 13 Nov 19 FBI Tactical Intelligence Report/Bio-weapons & WMDD
FIGURE 15: Historic employment number eviscerated
FIGURE 16: Mortality and infection rates dependent upon age and underlying conditions
FIGURE 17: NYT’s reporting representative of false narrative propagating a fear message; data is mitigated exponentially by updated statistics and numbers
FIGURE 18: Dr. Stephen Smith’s data regarding underlying conditions
FIGURE 19: COVID-19 image presented by QAnon
FIGURE 20: NVSS memo shaping nationwide “liberal approach” (Birx) to diagnosis and cause of death declarations

13 JAN 17 PANDEMIC CONSTRUCT INSERTION

Figures 21-26: Leaked slides from the pandemic scenario insertion on 13 Jan 17 during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings:

FIGURE 21: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 22: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 23: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 24: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 25: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 26: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 27: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 28: “This is Bill Gates”
FIGURE 29: Image Catherine Herridge/Techno Fog Steele dossier FBI sub-source verified dossier as disinformation 12 Jan 17 (SOURCE)
FIGURE 30: Just some baseless self-promotion to bolster the spirit…..

TIMELINE

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

-2016-
13 Mar: Obama Executive order/Public Law 113-146 Presidential Transition

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2018-
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

Drink your Moonshine…

It’s good for the TRUTH.

A Dark Day of Reckoning is Upon Us but Worry Not

21 Apr 20 (THIRTY-FIRST article in a series).

A dark day of reckoning is upon us and it dictates that we must directly confront some American conventions; perhaps some of your own conventions. The time has arrived to bury pretense for posterity’s sake and simply be honest with ourselves and we must do this before America turns a corner from which it never will return.

We should all be feeling the gravity of this somber passage because there is no mistaking it – a dark day of reckoning has arrived. Worry not though, for a bright and promising horizon draws near and as founded by a ‘Great Awakening’ of knowledge and thought. Be appropriately and respectfully reminded, though, that nothing comes without a price; especially with traditional America hanging in the balance.

The Mason Jar
</> A common sense and pragmatic appeal to Americans outlining how and why the COVID-19 pandemic is a false flag political construct devised to steal an unwinnable 2020 election.

With this series of articles now eclipsing thirty, I have to leave it to new readers to catch-up mostly on their own. The subject matter here is just too deep, entangled and encompassing to recapitulate it with each new article.

If you are new please consider seeing HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom: hypothesis, team update, disclaimers, graphics and timeline.

*The graphics are very helpful in consuming large quantities of information succinctly.

The First Step is Always Dost Difficult

Before we can take a single step further, you have to acknowledge one simple thing in the form of a question – Do you care to wrestle with the truth or do care to brush-up against it; perhaps dabble in it; maybe dip your toe in it but not really jump right into the deep (and it is deep – very, very deep) end and go for a swim? We’re here to swim, folks, so don your trunks because we’re standing on the end of the diving board understanding that we can’t learn the truth unless we get wet.

This will be messy and it will hurt in some aspects because what we’re about to do is park nostalgia and take reality for a ride. Most importantly, an open mind and a keen eye for evidence will serve us all well.

Talking to the Human Side of You

Today we shift gears and diverge from the intricate graphics, constant analysis, finding of fact sets, discernment, interpretation, etc. Rather, today we write to appeal to the human side of you – the same side of you that Birx and Fauci are taking away with their draconian, disproportionate and, yes, politically designed quarantine measures. Today we are appealing to your inner person who feels things in the gut and listens to that intuition while at the same time allows the brain to do the thinking, analyzing, discerning, rationalizing and decision-making; and in an abundance of tangible evidence. For our purposes here, that evidence has been presented over 30 previous articles and it’s there waiting for you to consume independently.

Today’s conversation, though, is of a different tone and a much more profound one.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
– EDMUND BURKE

Today, we’re here to discuss how you know that something is not right with the status quo and how it’s difficult to grip that yet again, another crisis just happened pop-up out of nowhere. That yet again, another convenient crisis just happened to converge on a timeline of marked political expedience. That yet again, we have another crisis that compels legislators and authorities to “help you” as they “care about your safety” all they while they insert themselves into your private and public lives using fear and panic to force their way in and using the US Constitution as their doormat upon entry.

So, we’re talking to that side of you – the side that’s had enough and is willing to discuss it but is uncertain as to what to do next.

American Resolve in the Face of Dark Times

Relative to an undercurrent of DC insider dialogue; some of which occasionally has daylight shone upon it in appropriate ways; this being one of them, we must ask why it is that people – people in the highest political echelon whom matter and are central to things – are going dark in DC and other locales? Take that literally and understand that it’s pretext for something imminent and with traction.

Another way to frame it and if we were speaking in boxing vernacular, there are astronomically heavy blows; universal haymakers if you will, occurring in the depth of the shadows right now and even beyond the scope of what we we think we already know and that’s horrific. So join us in giving credence to that warning because that’s where the light has shone and that’s the word from the inside. Be respectfully reminded that we’re living through historic times; if not revolutionary ones.

To move forward, we require crystalline clarity. The burden we face is in no way germane to political party, political affiliation or political philosophy and I say that respectfully but forcefully. There will be a more appropriate time to discuss those important matters but this is not that time. Rather, today is about nothing more than Americans being American and defending America, because that’s precisely what’s at stake.

If you’re a religious person; a Christian perhaps, I encourage you to hold-on and continue reading. You know the President to be a man of great religiosity and that is something about which he is open and proud as much as it is relevant to everything you see going on around you right now.

Today we face a moment that is truly good v. evil. If you don’t see that now, that’s okay because I am confident that you will see it plainly in hindsight. I’m confident that if you abandon our message today that at sometime in the near future you will likely return because what I’m writing about here will also be clear in hindsight. Feedback of a particular sort tells me as much.

The Crux Move on the Most Important Face

Any climber worth his or her salt will tell you that at the time one decides to embark on a route to conquer a face, there will be a defining moment – a maneuver – that must be executed exactly and with precision, skill and determination and at the absolute worst place and time on the route. It’s the crux move and failure to make it results in failure to send the route and complete the mission. The steeper the route, the more difficult the crux. Any climber worth his salt will also tell you that you want to make that move cleanly.

What we all need understand at this moment is that America’s crux is situated squarely on an overhang with a do or die outcome awaiting.

Here is your crux move – accepting that a cohort of dark and shadowy criminals using the Democratic Party as its hammer intentionally released the COVID-19 virus and they did it out of self-preservation and to steal a presidential election in which they can’t even compete; much less win. Perhaps you’ve already had that thought; perhaps not. The folks at PM have not only had that thought, we’ve worked to compile the elemental evidence that can be arranged to demonstrate it.

The capacity to turn an ear to the right conversation and pick-up on factual but unreported lines of dialogue can be enlightening in very impactful ways; the most powerful of which is reinforcement that the trail upon which we travel will eventually bear fruit; that this dog will hunt. Let me tell you. Our feedback tells us that this dog will hunt.

Gravity

So we acknowledge that a dark day of reckoning is upon us, pulling downward as we attempt our one and only opportunity at a crux move. Know that we don’t say that lightly nor do we say it irresponsibly. I’m fully aware of the gravity that such a statement has in a time like this; a time where all you hear about ad nauseam is the redundant messaging – social programming, if you will – that drones on and on about your “safety” and these “uncertain” and “challenging times.” A time that has America literally shut down and Americans locked-down; and not by your President, but by a criminal cohort that has usurped his emergency powers by means of a political construct inserted into his incoming administration on 13 Jan 17. Rather, it’s Deep State and Obama holdovers Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Brix running point for the real power brokers pulling levers in the backdrop. And that’s why we’re here.

Onward Together

This is the moment when we as Americans lock arms and force ourselves onward together as we look for others to join the cause. We look for others whom have the courage to stand resolutely and declare loudly what they see, know, believe and can demonstrate. We look for others willing to say that we’re not going to tolerate autocratic tyranny driven by panic, fear and cooked-up scenarios anymore. We look for others resistant to be herded up and slaughtered like ignorant sheep.

But you have to make your crux move first. You can’t expect to fight – MUCH LESS WIN – if you can’t see your enemy. If you can’t properly identify your enemy for whom that enemy is, then how can you possibly expect to see it, much less hit it? More likely, that enemy has been standing next to you and whispering in your ear the entire time but you just didn’t have the proper lens to see it. Please borrow ours.

With high confidence and reliably sourced information, I can say that beneath the fraudulent veneer of the COVID-19 landscape, there is an ongoing war between good and evil; a fight replete with sinister elements beyond a realistic scope.

Reality Settles In

Reality settles-in for us where evil interfaces with our government because government is the conduit to power, authority, control and wealth. The feedback received concerning the direction of our reporting establishes that we can stand on our evidence and extend the hypothesis to an actual claim. Allow me to summarize exactly what that means based upon the evidence at hand:

  1. A coronavirus strain was evidently bio-engineered from work established in MERS, SARS, HIV and others and to have certain designed attributes (see most/least vulnerable populations.)
  2. China, the WHO, the CDC, Bill Gates, Harvard University, George Soros, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, NIAID and a host of other entities are all functional assets within the political construct serving forces opposite the President
  3. The weaponized strain was smuggled to China and evidently ties back to Harvard University; with speculation that Canada played a critical role in the research, development and smuggling
  4. The political construct was inserted into the incoming Trump administration on 13 Jan 17, which was the same day that the MSM released the cooked-up Russia/Flynn story and preempting the compulsory transition meetings in which Flynn was participating. That is what you would identify as a diversion tactic. Importantly, the meetings occurred the day after the FBI learned that its sub-source on the Steele dossier confirmed that the dossier was not only patently false but contained Russian state-sponsored propaganda; meaning that at that moment, the entirety of the Mueller probe was known to be fraudulently predicated. This explains the thrust behind shifting to the Ukraine call for the impeachment predication.
  5. Russia, Mueller, Ukraine and impeachment all converged on the COVID-19 established timeline and served two parallel purposes: actual attempts to remove President Trump and provision of cover needed (diversion) for the implementation and insertion of the COVID-19 construct.
  6. The virus was intentionally (how, we don’t know yet) leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab, which is entangled with essentially all of the parties outlined in point two above and a host of others.
  7. The FBI was aware of the original outbreak in October 2019 but did nothing with the information presumably due to the existence of an ancillary intelligence report attached to the matter that was marked FISA.
  8. The compulsory transition meetings thrust the Gates’ and China’s WHO into preeminent authority and it was the CDC, WHO, Fauci and Birx who completely and inexplicably mismanaged the entire front end of the outbreak as the President rightfully and legally defaulted to his “experts.” It was their recommendations that have us were we are today as much as it was the bungled local responses like what we saw from Cuomo and de Balsio.
  9. The pandemic – as you can see since most of us of are not working or attending school and all of America is upside down and on its proverbial head – is being used as a political lever to cleave the President’s historic successes away from him and the people away from the President. More importantly and absolutely clearly, is that COVID-19 is being used as the basis to call for the implementation of an alternative electoral system for 2020 that is guaranteed to be abused and manipulated.

They’re going to ride this inserted political pony until it drops dead or until it reaches the electoral finish line.

Read the series – the evidence is mostly there (there’s still a lot more to find.) It’s also important to note that the outline above represents our best effort to arrange elemental evidence in a logical fashion and we certainly leave open room for other similar plausible explanations. The takeaway; however, is that much like 9/11, the ‘official narrative’ is far from the mark.

So where does that leave us? It leaves you with a decision to make. Is this another convenient disaster or are you listening to your gut? Did that politically convenient pandemic occur naturally or by design?

A New Course Toward a Bright and Promising Horizon

We can either stay the course that delivered Kennedy’s assassination, 9/11, all of the war in the Middle East and now this, or we do something different.

I grew-up in the Midwest and I come from what used to be one of the most Conservative and Republican places in the entire US. I used to teach US History and for a long time I was a robotic, straight-ballot voting Republican. That all changed for me when a devout Socialist and Liberal once challenged my own conventions in the context of 9/11. I pushed back just like some of you may be pushing back now. All he asked me to do was “look into it.” I did and here we are. All I’m asking you to do is look into it.

Learning History to Avoid Repeating It

Having one’s conventions challenged is painful and I know because I went through the process. Realizing that what you thought you knew and valued is fraudulent or unworthy is sobering and beyond disappointing. But I’d rather be an informed and sober individual than someone with my head buried in the grains of delusion, propaganda and consumerism.

Deciding to see the light and learn the truth can be frightening but it is ultimately liberating and invoking of a sense of free will, independence and courage – all of the things that are core to traditional American values anre requisite for America’s posterity. So remember, what happens to us is not as important as to how we respond to it. Our small team at Political Moonshine is asking you to respond by helping us spread the word and share the information.

Having everyone on-message is our only hope and we are remiss in our civic duties if we fail to learn our history. If we do not, we will most certainly repeat it. Look around you – we are currently repeating it germane to 11 Sep 01. So we challenged your conventions because we had to. It was the task at hand. It is the only way.

We’ll close with why we had to do it.

This is building 7 as it stood on 11 Sep 01. As the crow flies, structures like this are engineered with 800-900% redundant strength as reinforced with steel and concrete and can withstand earthquakes. This building was never engulfed in fire. It was never struck by anything. It just “fell down” like this virus just broke-out at the most politically expedient time so as to damage President Trump and his historic presidency.

History is revealing. Join us and don’t let it repeat itself.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

Contents: Hypothesis, Team Update, Disclaimer, QAnon disclaimer, Timeline, Graphics

*Please find related graphics and images and the timeline at the bottom.

*If you are brand new, there are two recommendations as to where to begin catching-up and they are posted at the very bottom – one shorter than the other.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update/Team: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

DisclaimerThis has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon Disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

A Word on Intent: There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

Where to Start Catching-up: I have two shortcuts for new readers looking to catch-up and avoid reading from article one. The ninth article – IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW – served as a recapitulation as of 14 Mar 20. Alternatively, you could take a bigger shortcut and pick-up with CAUSE OF DEATH FOR SALE posted 12 Apr 20.

IS COVID-19 A GLOBAL 9/11? EVIDENCE CAN BE ARRANGED TO SUGGEST A FALSE FLAG CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S HOW

CAUSE OF DEATH – FOR SALE

CATALOG

GRAPHICS

FIGURE 1: Underlying premise/manipulating infection data to drive false narrative
FIGURE 2: Elaboration on underlying premise in Fig. 1
FIGURE 3: Excerpts from relevant headlines in support of hypothesis and underlying premise
FIGURE 4: Analysis of article authored by Bill Gates on 28 Feb 20
FIGURE 5: “Fraud” begins to emerge in the subtext of the MSM relative to COVID-19
FIGURE 6: Graphic outlining suspicious deaths related to COVID-19
FIGURE 7: Curious word choice and messaging one month before presidential transition meetings on 13 Jan 17
FIGURE 8: Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program) position posted with open dates of 15 Nov 19 – 05 May 20 (Note: 1st US: 20 Jan 20, initial/original Wuhan outbreak: 27 Dec 19 [revised back to 17 Nov 19], FBI knowledge of outbreak: October 2019)
FIGURE 9: Early NYC fatalities reflecting underlying conditions component
FIGURE 10: ‘Event 201’ information
FIGURE 11: Historically anomalous drop-off in pneumonia deaths 2019-2020
FIGURE 12: $171 million increase in funding form US to WHO on the established 2016-2017 timeline
FIGURE 13: Bill Gates purchased the CDC like he did the WHO – with funding
FIGURE 14: Image grab of the 13 Nov 19 FBI Tactical Intelligence Report/Bio-weapons & WMDD
FIGURE 15: Historic employment number eviscerated
FIGURE 16: Mortality and infection rates dependent upon age and underlying conditions
FIGURE 17: NYT’s reporting representative of false narrative propagating a fear message; data is mitigated exponentially by updated statistics and numbers
FIGURE 18: Dr. Stephen Smith’s data regarding underlying conditions
FIGURE 19: COVID-19 image presented by QAnon
FIGURE 20: NVSS memo shaping nationwide “liberal approach” (Birx) to diagnosis and cause of death declarations

13 JAN 17 PANDEMIC CONSTRUCT INSERTION

Figures 21-26: Leaked slides from the pandemic scenario insertion on 13 Jan 17 during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings:

FIGURE 21: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 22: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 23: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 24: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 25: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 26: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 27: Pandemic Response Scenario
FIGURE 28: “This is Bill Gates”
FIGURE 29: Image Catherine Herridge/Techno Fog Steele dossier FBI sub-source verified dossier as disinformation 12 Jan 17 (SOURCE)

FIGURE 30: Just some baseless self-promotion to bolster the spirit…..

TIMELINE

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

-2016-
13 Mar: Obama Executive order/Public Law 113-146 Presidential Transition

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

12 Jan: FBI verifies via its sub-source that Steele dossier is fraudulent and Russian disinformation (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2018-
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD, NVSS issues COVID-19 diagnosis shaping memo
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

Drink your Moonshine…

It’s good for the TRUTH.

DEAD AMERICAN JOINS 3 DEAD CANADIANS AS COVID-19 CONSTRUCT DARKENS

17 Apr 20 (THIRTIETH article in a series).

Today’s article is loaded with detailed graphics to help facilitate consuming large amounts of content in a single image. Listening to team members and readers who have thoughtfully provided constructive criticism and feedback, we’re making adjustments all rooted in getting you the best, most detailed and evidence-supported information succinctly and efficiently.

Reviewing the Old and Introducing the New

Trying to delineate the finer points of myriad details heavy in minutia but which bind together the major and underlying premises we’re establishing in this immensely overarching construct is difficult work. There is an appropriate place to be – a fulcrum point if you will – that balances two things: establishing and communicating our premise while also supporting it with evidence. With a related suggestion from Anonfag on Gab, you’ll also find a new addition to articles – The Mason Jar. It will appear near the top and serve as an abstract. Here’s today’s Mason Jar:

The Mason Jar
</> Bill Gates, Barry/Honey Sherman, Frank Plummer, Timmothy Cunningham, CDC, NIAID, US, China, Canada, Dr. Deborah Birx, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Clintons, William Barr, Donald Trump
</> Timeline 2015-present
</> False flag political construct relying on manipulated data
</> POTUS/AG messaging ‘fraud’
</> 4th suspicious death
</> Peculiar 15 Dec 16 message from Obama, “virus” & “political ecosystem”

Before we get further into it, if you are new please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS; including the hypothesis for our position at the bottom, otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

It All Starts with Gates

Here’s a quick graphic review of our established hypothesis and although our research didn’t necessarily start with Bill Gates initially, it got there in a hurry. It all begins with Bill Gates.

On 28 Feb 20, Gates penned an article he posted on his own website and it’s worthy of reading in full. I’ve analyzed it here and it tells where we’re headed, which comports with our general assertions – we’re headed toward a global vaccination program and COVID-19 is the impetus to install it. Here’s Gates in his own words.

There should be no mistaking Gates’s own words – he’s told us what the end game or the ultimate objective is; however, what about the underlying premise that adheres Gates’ stated objectives to the COVID-19 construct? Simply, see COVID-19 as a vehicle – whatever that can be packed into it can transported to the ‘new normal.’ COVID-19 is justification, rationale, an impetus or a catalyst. So, Gates is packing is objectives into COVID-19 and hitting the road. Destination? “New Normalville.”

With Gates’ being foundation to it all, his objectives must be in alignment with China, the WHO, the CDC and the NIAID (Dr. Anthony Fauci’s outfit that falls under the umbrella of the CDC) since Gate’s owns them all through independent funding. So, does China, the US, the UK and others and now you see why this is all so vast. What I’m pulling from all of this is that for Gates to make good, he must co-opt all the necessary levers (nations, governments, agencies, departments, NGOs, etc.) And that’s what he did – he bought them all.

The Crux of the Construct – Cooked-up Data

Here’s the crux of it all as best we can tell.

It’s a simple one and I’ll refer you back to the leaked memo that was issued by the NVSS and, in Dr. Deborah Birx’s words, mandates a “liberal approach” for medical providers in making ’cause of death’ declarations. In other words, in addition to actual COVID-19 diagnoses and fatalities being reported and included in data sets, there is evidence that non-COVID-19 cases are being reported extensively so as to drive the narrative. Or, in even simpler terms, they are fixing the books and selling cooked-up data to embellish an actual event to the extent that it can be constructively manipulated for political purposes and with laser focus on 2020. It’s the only way they can win.

There is a lesson to be learned in all of this and it’s basic – CONTROL WHAT YOU CAN CONTROL. The cohort of people driving this narrative-based political construct found themselves inconveniently and unexpectedly out of power. The evidence suggests this cohort evaluated holdover personnel (whom do they still have in place in the incoming Trump administration?) in critical areas across the federal apparatus (what access to power levers do they have?). The decision was Fauci and Birx – two long-tenured bureaucrats embedded in the Deep State.

One thing that can be controlled; especially with a NVSS memo compelling liberal cause of death declaration policies, is data. Fauci and Birx are manipulating the data and augmenting real statistics so as to paint an inaccurate portrait of a pandemic that actually pales in comparison to historical pneumonia and flu mortality rates:

Understand this critical point from the underlying premise – by selling a false narrative that is contextually a global viral pandemic triggers a waterfall of federal policies and laws that impact all of this. That said, this construct functions to usurp the President’s emergency powers triggered by the emergency/pandemic declaration. That is MONUMENTAL and a backbone aspect in all of this.

Recall what I wrote in the Cause of Death for Sale – a pillar article in this series,

But what about of the all of the honest, hardworking healthcare providers? How could they be compelled to do such a thing. Let me tell you – $$$$$$. It’s written into the legislation.

Here’s what I mean by that and it’s a structural component to the entire premise of the articlethe cause of death is essentially for sale so long as health officials are making those declarations in alignment with the scope of the leaked memo. How so? Think of it this way. The federal funding received per patient relative to the design of the construct is analog to fuel for an engine. Now that the engine has started with a spark (viral outbreak) and medical providers are feeling the full weight of its impact (the one’s that are), it’s the fuel (federal funding) that keeps it running. It’s a financial incentive from the primary source of funding to entice providers to “see things our way.” Of course they’re going to comply, the funders also have oversight of and regulate their entire profession.

According to Senator Dr. Scott Jensen in an article at TGP, “Right now Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much. Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things impact on what we do.”

So, how and why would hospitals go along? Well for one, their cause of death declarations have been shaped as outlined in the leaked memo and if that’s not good enough, for every time a hospital admits a COVID-19 patient, there’s an infusion of federal dollars that follows. It should come as no surprise that providers would more or less go along on these lines. When is the last time you heard health care workers complaining about too much funding? Exactly.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

Has The Hand Been Tipped and Have the Cards Been Seen?

The President and his Attorney General are seem to be communicating in their own way. AG William Barr gave a fascinating reply to a question in the second part of his interview with Laura Ingraham that was fascinating and was peculiarly rooted in the word fraud. On the same timeline, look at the President’s messaging.

The evidence suggesting fraudulent aspects to COVID-19 is stacking up like lumber at a wood mill. The evidence also takes on a ominous and dark tone that compels us to ask this question – Why are so many people who are circumstantially enmeshed in the COVID-19 construct and on the established timeline ending up dead under questionable circumstances? It’s probably because the Clintons are involved.

Did you take note of the fact that of the four dead individuals above, four of them were Canadian? Tip of the hand – look for that theme to continue in the next article as we explore Canada, energy, uranium, the Clintons, Uranium 1, human sex-trafficking and a billionaire named Frank Giustra. It’s all old news but we’re exploring whether there is an overlap between all of that, Canada and COVID-19; especially since Canada’s only appropriate lab is so highly entangled in coronavirus and bioweapons smuggling specifically with the Chinese. Is Canada common theme? What about the FBI? They overlap both U1 and COVID-19? Perhaps. Likely – we’ll see.

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE AND A PECULIAR MESSAGE FROM BARACK OBAMA

As I continue to reiterate, the evidence is mounting and often, contextual examination of the current headlines are revealing. Consider:

As if there weren’t already enough reasons to legitimately question why we are on national lock down, we have concerning messaging coming from the resistance’s point man, Barack Obama. In review of his interview from 15 Dec. 16, consider his comments at 13:37 of the interview in light of were we are today:

Then President Obama either accidentally or intentionally demonstrated outstanding prognosticating skills, did he not? What an interesting analogy.

WRAPPING UP WITH #FalseFlagFauci

In our next article, we’ll examine a Fauci pandemic preparedness speech that he delivered with his own sense of authority on 02 Oct 17. As we do, we’ll ask ourselves, “Just how did America end up on lock down with such an “expert” in charge?

Pro-tip: It’s a matter of allegiance; not expertise.

-End-

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

*Please find the timeline at the bottom.

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

-2016-
13 Mar: Obama Executive order/Public Law 113-146 Presidential Transition

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2018-
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD, NVSS issues COVID-19 diagnosis shaping memo
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

Drink your Moonshine…

It’s good for the TRUTH.

TRUMP UNDOES FAUCI AND MSM IN ONE LEGENDARY PRESSER THAT PROVES COVID-19 IS A FALSE FLAG POLITICAL CONSTRUCT

14 Apr 20 (TWENTY-NINTH article in a series)

Political constructs are as old as politics and they’re unavoidable up to a point in time that Americans change and we can mostly elect to Congress legitimate representatives that give fidelity to both important national matters and the wishes of their own constituents. But as Monty Python reminds us, “There’s always one, isn’t there?” Well let me tell you – there’s way more than one. Way more.

Unfortunately, this particular future point in time will always be never until the American people wake-up, wrap their minds around reality, embrace their civic responsibilities and take action to change their own circumstances. Until then, we will be forced to occasionally confront evil and wrongdoing when we see it from our elected leaders and let me be crystal clear about this and beyond any reasonable doubt or any second-guess: right now, at this very moment, there is a cohort of corrupt politicians and Deep State criminals openly trying to steal the 2020 election and I’ve been saying it since 29 articles ago. COVID-19 is the cover.

Unquestionably, we find ourselves squarely in the middle of a time of historic proportions – see 9/11 for deeper understanding. More importantly, see what occurred AFTER 9/11 (the Patriot Act isn’t very patriotic – at all.) All of this matters; enormously and for posterity’s sake.

Getting back to political constructs, don’t take my word for the lying, cheating and stealing (of the 2020 election.) Rather, just listen to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as she describes an aspect of their tool kit in substantial detail. Again, it’s an and old tiresome tactic.

For re-posting this gem of a clip – still can’t believe this fool Pelosi uttered these words on camera – we give a hat tip to Conservative stalwart and Political Moonshine favorite, James Woods:

There you have it – Pelosi reminding us all of just how her ilk does business – FRAUDULENTLY – and resting on a foundation lies repeated by others; namely the MSM. Remember the root word here – FRAUD.

Before we get further into it, if you are new please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS; including the hypothesis for our position at the bottom, otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

To review the assertions in CAUSE OF DEATH FOR SALE, we’ll rely on memetic learning below. To examine the entire crux of our hypothesis – selling cooked up data in combination with a very real viral outbreak – we’ll consider Pelosi’s statements above and relative to the matter of John Brennan including the fraudulent and infamous Christopher Steele dossier into then President Obama’s PDB, which is one of the most salient moments in this ongoing coup d’etat to eliminate President Trump and steal 2020.

This moment represents what I believe is the first insertion point where candidate Trump, President-elect Trump, President Trump and the entire Trump umbrella were targeted with the FISA process as a part of a broader and preexisting Obama political spying operation unfolding a much longer timeline that likely goes back to the early parts of Obama’s first term. Brennan slipping the dossier into the PDB is akin to Brennan slipping a noose around President Trump’s neck and it should be viewed as nefarious because that’s precisely what it is. The COVID-19 construct is very similar.

The identified primary mechanism for the COVID-19 construct is manipulating (or cooking or laundering) infection and fatality rates, the latter of which is being shaped by a leaked cause of death declaration memo included in the last article. The other force driving the construct at the local level (medical providers) derives its thrust legislatively and by means of federal funding. In a sense, every COVID-19 patient equates to an infusion of federal dollars.

It’s important to remember that intelligence and data can be laundered just like money and I’ve talked about this at length before. For clarity and again, that’s what Fauci and Birx are doing. They’re taking a very real viral pandemic and they are shaping the relevant infection data to achieve a particular political narrative. Period. And we have the evidence.

For a contemporaneous and relevant example, consider then CIA Director John Brennan’s decision to include the fraudulent Steele dossier into then President Obama’s PDB. This singular step by Brennan to include the dossier in the PDB gave the dossier instant credibility and veracity. Why would anyone ever question whether or not the intelligence that goes into the PDB is anything other than authentic and reliable; especially when you gain an understanding of how the PDB is complied and the number of agencies involved? Exactly, you wouldn’t. Rather, you would have faith and confidence in the intelligence complex to keep the President appropriately informed.

That is, unless you knew better and you knew that John Brennan has both communist and Muslim entanglements in his backdrop. But that’s PRECISELY how beholden, dastardly, calculating, evil and duplicitous President Trump’s enemies are and the former President’s administration was.

Brennan knew that if he could assign the standing of the PDB to the fraudulent Steele dossier by including the latter in the former, then he could launder the fraudulent information into (fraudulent) intelligence and thus give it instant credibility and veracity in the public’s eye. So, that’s what they did.

The case of the COVID-19 construct is no different. It was inserted during the transition meetings on 13 Jan 17, which was the same day that the cooked-up Russia/Flynn revelations were made public by the complicit MSM and in preemptive form. Guess who was in those transition meetings, which the Obama personnel immediately characterized after the fact as being palpably peculiar and with tension such that Trump’s people were described as as off kilter, disengaged, uninterested, etc.? Answer – Lt. General Michael Flynn.

So, the COVID-19 construct relies on false data just like the FISA construct relied on false intelligence. Have you noticed that the President’s political enemies simply rehash the same old recipes within a different context? Once you do, it’s not that difficult to find the evidence and understand what they’re doing. I found it. I think.

In part, you can digest it here otherwise I refer you back to the article:

This is the crux of it – take note of the inverse relationship that is historically anomalous.

Here’ how pneumonia and the flu (common cold) can be interchanged in the face of the inverse relationship as demonstrated above.

Here’s an 28 Feb 20 article authored by Bill Gates prognosticating the direction we’re headed and it’s not a good one (if you’re unfamiliar with Gates’ complicity in all of this – please see the catalog because you have some reading ahead of you.)

We understand that our assertions claim that long-tenured bureaucrats and Obama holdovers Dr. Deborah Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci are complicit in a broader false flag political construct. Therein, the evidence demonstrates that their duties are to steer the President to a predetermined and politically disadvantageous position, which for him was shuttering the most historic economy and employment numbers ever. MOST IMPORTANTLY – the president is compelled to heed their advice. THAT is the construct. It’s the mechanism that allows for the usurpation of emergency powers.

Let’s review Dr. Fauci’s role, shall we? I’m going to ruin it for you, though. On the back end of what you’re about ready to see, which was included in previous articles, President Trump will grab Fauci’s leash, drag him to the podium and require that he set the record straight.

For context, here is Fauci 21 Jan 20.

Here is Fauci on 03 Apr.

Here’s Fauci on 08 Apr.

Here’s Fauci on 10 Apr (caught red-handed on a hot camera leaking to the MSM in a way counter to the President’s agenda and objectives.)

As I mentioned in CAUSE OF DEATH FOR SALE, Fauci’s position in all of this rests on a fulcrum with expertise on one side and allegiance on the other. As you watch below, remember Fauci’s words, positions and actions above. #LEGENDARYGEOTUS is about ready drag Fauci to the podium and require him to move that fulcrum point and slide it back to an appropriate position.

If you saw the presser or the highlights (low-lights), you know that CBS’s Paula Reid became completely unhinged and went berserk. That said, she asked the same question I had wanting to know whether Fauci was compelled to offer the information you’re about ready to see or he volunteered it. WATCH Fauci’s reaction – the death stare tells you what you need to know. Despite her despicable behavior, she was right to ask that question. I also think it’s reasonable to say that we’re correct in that Fauci was lying in his response.

Here is the full clip of one of the most LEGENDARY presidential press briefings in what has to be all of American history. We pick-up Fauci at the 2:59 mark so please cue-up to that point. (To see the LEGENDARY moment the President used a highly effective video presentation to call a spade and spade and tell the MSM to go put its nose in the corner, come back to this clip and cue-up to 15:14 – as I said, LEGENDARY.)

On a good note, Fauci discussed America’s now proverbial flattening of the curve but then and in typical Deep State fashion, he sank into narrative delivery mode whereby he stated that health disparities and discrepancies; both in infections and outcomes for minorities, are reportedly causing that subgroup to suffer disproportionately.

Here is Fauci quoted with emphasis added and it justifies the use of the word ‘proof’ in the title. This is the precise moment that the President forces Fauci to undo himself on the world’s stage and right before Trump undoes the MSM; again in legendary fashion,

“We had been talking, before any meetings that we had, about the pros and the cons, the effectiveness or not, of strong mitigations (quarantine), so discussions were going on mostly among the medical people, about what that would mean. The first and only time that Dr. Birx and I went in and formally made a recommendation to the President, to actually have a, quote (gesture) shut down in the sense of not really shut down, but to have really strong mitigation, we discussed it. Obviously there would be concern by some. In fact that might have some negative consequences. Nonetheless, the President listened to the recommendation and went to the mitigation.

The next, second time that I went with Dr. Birx, into the President and said 15 days are not enough, we need to go 30 days, obviously there were people who had a problem with that because of the potential secondary effects. Nonetheless, at that time, the President went with the health recommendations and we extended it another 30 days…. But I can just tell you. The first and only time that I went in and said we should do mitigation strongly, the response was, ‘yes, we’ll do it.’

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI

Fauci went on to confirm that every single time he asked President Trump for measures, mitigation, etc – travel restrictions (China), Europe and the UK – “the answer was ‘yes.'”

Does all of that not fly in the face of Fauci’s previous comments? What about the overt and explicit but subtle signaling to MSM correspondents following pressers when those reporters were adversarial to the President in those moments?

Translating Fauci’s statement to bare bones, he told us that he and Birx bear full responsibility for every measure the President has taken because they asked him and he granted it – every single time and on the first time.

So, America, it’s Fauci and Birx that have you shut down, out of school, out of work and frustrated. The President is just playing ball by the rules. My question is, and I’m looking directly at you Attorney General William Barr, where are the referees?

What I’ve just outlined for you is exactly how the President has trapped the DSSG/MIC/Left inside of its own political construct and with all exits closed. As I previously wrote, it’s reported that Winston Churchill once stated, “If you’re going through hell, keep going.” President Trump eliminated their options and set their course for them – onward!

Do you see how he plays by the rules with everything? That’s how he’s trapped them inside of their own construct – by making them own their own decisions and mandates.

Remember, the law compels the President to defer to his experts. So, he does and by doing so, he plays by the rules, traps them and let’s them braid their own rope for execution – hangman style. We’ll call it suicide and we’ll call it that because the data that they offer does not comport with the FRAUD that they have unleashed on not only on America, but the entire planet. A day of reckoning should soon be upon us and let’s hope it actually arrives otherwise we’re another step closer to outright totalitarianism.

Make no mistake about it – the CAUSE OF DEATH IS FOR SALE. Birx and Fauci sold it to the President in a deal he couldn’t escape and then they sold it to all of us. Now we sit at home watching the next American ‘new normal’ being ushered-in by means of a false flag political construct. I’m ready for the President to claim his own deal-making prowess and right this sinking ship.

To close, if you believe our work here to be meritorious, worthy and something that others should see – and only because we have but one America that has been stolen and if we don’t fight to get it back, we’ll never get it back – please consider sharing articles and social media posts. We’re a very small but dedicated team of four deeply loyal patriots and we’d appreciate your support. Please note, we’re not asking for your money and we never will – rather we’re asking for your attention and your effort to disseminate what we believe is critically important information.

Godspeed.

-End-

A closing note…

Please expect a second article today detailing the recent death of the CDC’s Timothy J. Cunningham and covering other recent developments.

Determining how to open a new article has become a challenge. To a new reader, just picking-up where we last left-off does not work just as an exhaustive review on the front end of every new article won’t work. At this point, the information is too expansive and detailed and fraught with so many entanglements and conflicts that even I’m struggling keep some semblance of command. It’s an enormous, winding and always diverging hole into which we’ve jumped.

So, if I may, here’s an outline representing a ‘meat and potatoes’ selection from the now 29-article series that will allow newer readers to cover some ground more efficiently and as presented topically and chronologically:

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

*Please find the timeline at the bottom.

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

-2016-
13 Mar: Obama Executive order/Public Law 113-146 Presidential Transition

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2018-
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD, NVSS issues COVID-19 diagnosis shaping memo
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

CAUSE OF DEATH FOR SALE

THE COST? ONLY ANOTHER AMERICAN ‘NEW NORMAL.’

12 Apr 20 (TWENTY-EIGHTH article in a series)

The cause of death is for sale. There’s no other explanation that reasonably makes sense. What’s it going to cost you? Only everything – a ‘new normal’ is being ushered-in akin to what we experienced following the events of 9/11. Pay attention to mainstream messaging and the subtext in all of it – the evidence is everywhere like with this State Farm ad. Just listen to the opening line:

You sick of hearing about your s-word, you know – SAFETY- or any version of it? How important it is to everyone? How all these strangers – people that you apparently didn’t even know you knew – are so concerned for your s-word? And what about those uncertain and challenging times?

Ahhhhh, F-word!! I sure as hell am. I digress.

This will be perhaps the oddest segue you’ll ever see: moving from a State Farm Insurance commercial delivering NWO ‘new normal’ subtext to Bill Gates and using a ‘spirit cook’ to do it in Marina Ambrovic. So here goes.

This is Marina Ambrovic.

She’s super famous if you’re unfamiliar; well, at least in certain circles. Circles like the Clintons, Podestas, all of Hollywood and a bunch of others you’d recognize.

This is some of her work.

And this is one of her events.

Here’s the best segue of all time and I’ll leave it to you to make the deduction.

So she’s a good fit for Microsoft? Uh huh…..

This is Bill Gates.

This is also Bill Gates.

This, too, is Bill Gates (linked article at bottom of post – see title.)

And this is Bill Gates unable to say the word “morality” earnestly and in good faith.

It’s clear that many of us following the COVID-19 pandemic from the outbreak through today immediately began addressing relevant matters such as cui bono? That research almost immediately takes us to Gates; but only after a layover at George Soros as covered previously in the first several articles. The convergence of Gates and Soros on the 2016-2017 timeline (and before and after) can’t be emphasized enough and developing your own understanding of it all will be burdensome but helpful.

Today, we are revisiting Bill Gates and here’s what must be understood: trying to comprehend the degree of engrossment and entanglement of Bill Gates – the billionaire, the chief funder of the WHO and the global health and world hunger philanthropist – relative to virology and vaccination is a bit like trying fill a swimming pool one thimble full at a time. The information is voluminous and overwhelming. Frankly, the work here reflects on Gates’ backstory and is in no way a complete picture.

Here is a quick sidebar before getting into it and it’s one that’s a particularly puzzling aspect of Gates’ personal history whereby the billionaire maintained an ongoing relationship with another billionaire – Jeffrey Epstein – following Epstein’s conviction and release from prison as a sexual predator. It’s peculiar indeed and perhaps it speaks to Gates’ motive here in the spirit of self-preservation? Or not. I digress.

With the vastness of Gates’ backstory, we’ll default to memetic learning, as you can tell already, to digest as much information as possible. This article is unlike others I’ve written and it relies heavily on graphics, social media and other items to allow you to consume large amounts of information quickly.

Politico highlights aspects of Gates’ WHO backdrop that are significant (EMPHASIS added,)

Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom. This largesse gives him outsized influence over its agenda, one that could grow as the U.S. and the U.K. threaten to cut funding if the agency doesn’t make a better investment case.

The result, say his critics, is that Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s. Rather than focusing on strengthening health care in poor countries — that would help, in their view, to contain future outbreaks like the Ebola epidemic — the agency spends a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with the measurable outcomes Gates prefers, such as the effort to eradicate polio.

Evidence of Gates’ unprecedented influence abounds in ways subtle and showy.

He is treated liked a head of state, not only at the WHO, but also at the G20— Geneva-based NGO representative

The Gates Foundation has pumped more than $2.4 billion into the WHO since 2000, as countries have grown reluctant to put more of their own money into the agency, especially after the 2008 global financial crisis.

Dues paid by member states now account for less than a quarter of WHO’s $4.5 billion biennial budget. The rest comes from what governments, Gates, other foundations and companies volunteer to chip in. Since these funds are usually earmarked for specific projects or diseases, WHO can’t freely decide how to use them.

Most of the Gates Foundation’s influence in the WHO is very discreet, she said, adding that it can also decide to take initiatives outside of the organization, as it did with GAVI, which helps the poorest countries buy vaccines in bulk at a discount, or with a recently launched Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, an alliance to develop vaccines for emerging infectious diseases.

But the foundation’s focus on delivering vaccines and medicines, rather than on building resilient health systems, has drawn criticism. And some NGOs worry it may be too close to industry.

NATALIE HUET & CARMEN PAUN – POLITICO

For more perspective, here is what I’ve previously written about Gates including a quote from James Fetzer, respectively,

So, not only is billionaire and global string puller George Soros standing to benefit from this “outbreak” of coronavirus in Wuhan, China, so does billionaire and global string puller Bill Gates. Gates and his foundation just happened to have funded and participated in an exercise/drill simulating specifically a coronavirus outbreak some 6-weeks prior to the actual one. Not only that, Gates also happens to financially back the Pirbright Institute, which happens to own a patent for a strand of the coronavirus that may (will likely) provide a cure (vaccine) that is sure to also produce a king’s ransom. (SOURCE)

Here is the Fetzer quote (EMPHASIS mine),

In this report we take an inside look at Event 201, which took place in NYC on October 18 2019.

Event 201 is a high-level pandemic exercise hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

This is extremely fascinating because this pandemic simulation exercise of coronavirus took place about 6 weeks before the first illness from the coronavirus was actually reported in Wuhan, China.

That is one hell of a coincidence if you believe in that sort of thing.

Another fascinating connection is the fact that not only did the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation participate in and help set up the pandemic simulation of a coronavirus outbreak, but they just so happen to fund the group who owns the patent to the deadly coronavirus and are already working on a vaccine to solve the current crisis.

JAMES FETZER

Here’s the relevant information pertaining to Event 201.

Anyone played or coached athletics before? What do you do for days prior to any scheduled contest? You practice. I digress.

Anybody else concerned that Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum and John Hopkins practiced “COVID’ing” before the actual COVID-19 outbreak, as if there is some semblance of foreknowledge or predictability to it all (more about predictability below)?

Is there any wonder NOW as to why John Hopkins is so intricately involved in all of this?

Anybody concerned that Bill Gates has purchased and now essentially owns and wields the World Health Organization; along with the US and China (now) being the other two premier funders, but that he’s also enveloped similar others? Would you be surprised to learn that Gates has also essentially purchased and owns the CDC?

It seems that just as with the WHO, the CDC was also “for sale” and Bill Gates was their buyer. That’s a lot of money that has been promised to Dr. Fauci. Another way to look at this – in real world terms – is that GATES NOW OWNS FAUCI, too.

I wonder what Dr. Fauci prognosticated for President Trump’s administration in the days before his inauguration?

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI (L) SHAKING HANDS WITH BILL GATES (R)

Before we can consider Fauci’s prediction, we have to again give attention to then President Obama augmenting the presidential transition process with Public Law 114-136 circa 13 Mar 16. For context, understand the backdrop to Obama’s executive order. Here’s what I wrote previously with emphasis added,

First, realize this. With almost near certainty, internal polling likely informed the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton had no chance of winning the 2016 election in the months ahead. Heck, to know this all you had to do was look at the complete dearth of audience and following that she had at all of her campaign events and recalling that she essentially refused to hold any (Hillary napped through campaign season.) To the contrary, candidate Trump’s crowd sizes were akin to what we see today. Just like we know right now that the Democrats are dead in the water for 2020, it is virtually guaranteed that they knew they were dead in the water for 2016 when they passed this law on 18 Mar 16. So then, WHY did they pass it? That’s a rhetorical question.

From President Obama’s executive order (EMPHASIS added):

The gathering was held to satisfy a requirement in a 2016 law that updated the procedures around presidential transitions to require, among other things, that the outgoing administration “prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.” Obama also mentioned it in a 2016 executive order laying out his transition goals.

NAHAL TOOSI, DANIEL LIPPMAN & DAN DIAMOND – POLITICO

More from President Obama’s executive order,

c) The White House Transition Coordinating Council shall:

(i) provide guidance to executive departments and agencies (agencies) and the Federal Transition Coordinator regarding preparations for the Presidential transition, including succession planning and preparation of briefing materials;

(ii) facilitate communication and information sharing between the transition representatives of eligible candidates and senior employees in agencies and the Executive Office of the President, including the provision of information relevant to facilitating the personnel aspects of a Presidential transition and such other information that, in the Council’s judgment, is useful and appropriate, as long as providing such information is not otherwise prohibited by law; and

(iii) prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.

EXECUTIVE ORDER — FACILITATION OF A PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION – BARACK OBAMA

President Obama clearly took extra legislative steps to ensure that “emergency preparedness and response exercises” were included in the transition process before President Trump was inaugurated and long before COVID-19 broke out. Obama’s proclivity for prognosticating is second to none, eh? Or perhaps it’s reflective of constructive elements? What about Fauci’s ability to foresee the future?

Here is what Dr. Anthony Fauci predicted just prior to the Obama/Trump transition meetings held 13 Jan 17 (SOURCE) (EMPHASIS added.)

The history of the last 32 years that I have been the director of the NIAID will tell the next administration that there is no doubt they will be faced with the challenges their predecessors were faced with.

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI

From the same source, Healio,

During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.

HEALIO

The timing is critical to understand; if not MONUMENTAL. For context first consider our hypothesis in-part here and in more complete form in the housekeeping items below – “Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17.”

Fauci’s statement above preceded the transition meetings by two days (note that the timeline for the construct is substantial and so please refer to the housekeeping items for a more complete timeline.) The important dates here are:
2016
13 Mar: Obama> Public Law 114-136 passes augmenting the transition process
2017
11 Jan: Fauci predicts pandemic scenario for Trump administration
13 Jan: Outgoing Obama administration presents pandemic scenario to incoming Trump administration
2019
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov
2020
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment mgrs., engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration
15 Mar: FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
02 Apr: FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN

Here are actual slides leaked from the transition meetings mentioned above. Please pay particularly close attention to how Bill Gates’ and China’s World Health Organization is thrust into the position of preeminent authority on the matter because that is immensely important to our assertions here.

Just glancing at your television or the timeline above tells us that #FalseFlagFauci is beholden to others and not giving fidelity to legitimately fighting a global viral pandemic. In fact, his behavior is enough to consider fraudulent aspects to it.

Let’s examine Dr. Fauci and his progression of changing positions and we’ll do so by viewing the short clips in the following posts. Here’s Fauci on 21 Jan telling Americans that COVID-19 “is not a major threat for the people in the United States.”

Here’s Fauci months later on 04 Apr and on CNN of all places. Take note of the significant change in his position. How can this be for an “expert?”

That’s a rhetorical question that actually proves my entire point – I’m not questioning his expertise rather I am questioning his allegiance.

But don’t take my word for it. Take his.

You don’t understand why that’s not happening, sir? It’s because, Dr. Fauci, you told them – and I quote you here, sir – “This is not a major threat for the people in United States, and this is not something the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about.”

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

There’s more. Why is Dr. Fauci REPEATEDLY and subtlety but overtly signalling to MSM White House correspondents whom are routine adversarial and confrontational to the President during daily COVID-19 briefings?

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

Wait, it gets worse. Not only has #FalseFlagFauci been apparently colluding with the MSM by working behind the scenes to provide reporters with prefabricated questions to frame the President in the public’s view and according to his wishes (his handlers’ wishes); and not only has the so-called expert backtracked on his own devastating early advice; but he got caught on a live camera by the President for making said leaks. See for yourself – it’s a scene, man (video at bottom of post.)

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

Don’t go anywhere, there’s more. After watching this, ask yourself if #FalseFlagFauci is fighting a virus or the conventions of traditional America?

No more shaking hands? Are you kidding me? Realize this, America – Birx and Fauci desire to issue permanent guidelines that now stray down the path of keeping us from being not just American, but human.

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

So, ask yourself – Do you believe that Fauci is speaking with honesty and candor and giving fidelity to the cause at hand or is it something different? Is Fauci acting according to his expertise or allegiance? Are we dealing with an authentic global viral pandemic or an intentional global viral pandemic politically constructed to steal an election that is impossible to legitimately win? Perhaps it’s all something criminal and even fraudulent?

The evidence simply doesn’t stack-up; especially when considering contemporaneous media sources depicting highly questionable “cause of death” declarations and other statistical anomalies. For starters, we must consider the memo that has been leaked, which now shapes how medical providers are required to declare cause of death in suspected COVID-19 cases. Here’s that memo, which you can examine independently and which is also included in the first source below it:

From a single source, here are contemporaneous reports of conflicts and potentially fraudulent reporting of COVID-19 cause of death incidents and other relevant issues courtesy of TGP. Know that it’s a small selection from a long list of stories and reflective of many across the media spectrum:

02 Apr / TGP: HUGE! Infectious Disease Expert Says His Clinic Has Not Seen ANYONE UNDER 70 Who was not Obese or Pre-Diabetic Get Seriously Ill with COVID-19 (VIDEO)

02 Apr / TGP: BREAKING: New York Data Confirms Once Again – 99% of Coronavirus Fatalities Have Pre-Existing Conditions – 94% of Fatalities Over Age 45! …Open The Economy!

04 Apr / TGP: HUGE! From CDC Website: Hospitals to List COVID-19 as Cause of Death Even if It’s “Assumed to Have Caused Or Contributed to Death” – Lab Tests Not Required
Relevant: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” CDC guidelines issued March 24 read. “Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued. If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”

10 Apr / TGP: WTH? Massachusetts Is Going Back and Adding Coronavirus Deaths to Totals – Is this to Get More Cash?
Relevant: According to Senator Dr. Scott Jensen, “Right now Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much. Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things impact on what we do.”

10 Apr / TGP: MORE FRAUD EXPOSED: Washington State Coronavirus Field Hospital Will Be Dismantled Without Treating a Single Patient

11 Apr / TGP: UNACCEPTABLE! So-Called ‘Experts’ Were Off by 25 MILLION in California! Golden State Reaches Peak COVID-19 Deaths at 596 and 21,500 Infected

12 Apr / TGP: Fauci Fun Facts: Dr. Fauci’s AIDS Predictions Were Also WAY OFF THE MARK
Relevant: Fauci’s history of inaccurate modeling and a video clip (bottom clip) worth seeing firsthand: video of Fauci overstepping Trump to tamp down media enthusiasm for hydroxychloroquine.)

What kind of doctor steps on the President’s toes to pull back on the reigns of a highly demonstrable and promising treatment for a global pandemic? It’s all very bizarre, much like the Left’s and MSM’s own near total aversion to hydroxychloroquine.

Is that a matter of expertise or allegiance?

Before we move on to data, perhaps we should hear from one of Fauci’s colleagues:

There is substantial evidence that the infection and mortality rates of COVID-19 are grossly inaccurate and to the extent that it warrants legitimate concern about the possibility of a cohort of individuals antithetical to the President’s agenda and adversarial to him are executing a massive, politically constructed false flag event to steal the 2020 election.

Here’s how. Let’s examine some data.

Here we note a $171 million dollar increase in funding from the US to Gates’ and China’s WHO as converging on the important and established 2016-2017 timeline:

NYC’s early data suggest the same as what was being seen across the board nationally and primarily in that younger individuals with no underlying conditions were largely unaffected:

Consider hospitalization models versus actual numbers:

Here we notice an historically anomalous drop in pneumonia death rates and this is a backbone aspect to our hypothesis:

And that brings us to the crux of it all:

Study the graphic above merging two graphs and take note of the inverse relationship between the two: pneumonia deaths, which you can see dating back to 2014 relative to COVID-19 infection rates, which project to a similar line for fatalities. What immediately emerges is the historically anomalous and unaccounted for drop in pneumonia deaths that just happens to mirror the COVID-19 outbreak in the US for 2019-2020. You know, as if they just swapped places.

Now do you now see why we have an objective, data-driven, statistically based position from which to question the entire scope of this pandemic, which more accurately reflects a politically constructed false flag scenario?

In more detail, consider how COVID-19 can be accounted for by pneumonia and the flu:

Note: all COVID-19 symptoms can be accounted for by either pneumonia or the flu and at the same time we have the anomaly demonstrated above (a marked drop in pneumonia deaths.) Also, pay attention to the fatality rates between COVID-19 and the flu (follow the blue arrows) and then ask yourself why you never get locked down when exponentially more people die from an even more widely spread disease? Then ask yourself what happens the next time some autocratic, authoritarian and dictatorial plutocrat makes a mole hill into a mountain and declares a national emergency?

So, what are we saying? In short, we’re saying that Birx and Fauci have usurped the President’s emergency powers and have hi-jacked them on their way to sabotaging (a favorite word of Bill Barr) the Presidency and they’re doing it by selling cooked-up data to the American public and using it to keep us locked-up in our proverbial bedrooms until we learn to vote better or until the nation converts into a complete dumpster fire instead of the partial one we have now. I weaved in some sarcasm so please tap the brakes on a literal translation, but you know what I’m saying.

But what about of the all of the honest, hardworking healthcare providers? How could they be compelled to do such a thing. Let me tell you – $$$$$$. It’s written into the legislation.

Here’s what I mean by that and it’s a structural component to the entire premise of the articlethe cause of death is essentially for sale so long as health officials are making those declarations in alignment with the scope of the leaked memo. How so? Think of it this way. The federal funding received per patient relative to the design of the construct is analog to fuel for an engine. Now that the engine has started with a spark (viral outbreak) and medical providers are feeling the full weight of its impact (the one’s that are), it’s the fuel (federal funding) that keeps it running. It’s a financial incentive from the primary source of funding to entice providers to “see things our way.” Of course they’re going to comply, the funders also have oversight of and regulate their entire profession.

According to Senator Dr. Scott Jensen in an article at TGP, “Right now Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much. Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things impact on what we do.”

So, how and why would hospitals go along? Well for one, their cause of death declarations have been shaped as outlined in the leaked memo and if that’s not good enough, for every time a hospital admits a COVID-19 patient, there’s an infusion of federal dollars that follows. It should come as no surprise that providers would more or less go along on these lines. When is the last time you heard health care workers complaining about too much funding? Exactly.

Let’s get back to Bill Gates. He authored a revealing article on 28 Feb 20, which again is prior to the 11 Mar 20 pandemic/emergency declaration. I’ve analyzed the article for us here and it’s foreboding:

Distilled down to its most basic form, Bill Gates wants a massive, low-cost global vaccination campaign paid for by private and public entities and he’s bound and determined to find a way to make it happen and most likely a politically expedient one; like the pandemic we face right now.

Some online have argued that Gates has called for digital certificates of immunization, or certificates of vaccination ID, as in a certificate being a form of identification. It would be functional within society (access, services, etc.) and based on that assumption, there’s a strong contingency of folks whom firmly believe this, which I’ll let you deduce:

[C]ertificate [O]f [V]accination [ID]

That’s a little rich for my taste so I’ll leave that to said contingency of folks.

Here’s an interview from Gates from this morning and we’re only focusing on the first 50 seconds or so. Listen.

Did you catch that? Allow me to quote him for you, “The thing that will get us back to the world we had before coronavirus is the vaccine and getting that out to all 7 billion people.”

Now reconsider the summary in the above graphic that I wrote the night before. He wants to vaccinate the entire planet – he just said so – but like with anything else, there has to be proper rationale and justification. Enter COVID-19.

We know that Fauci and Birx are working closely together, but they also keep other company like powerful Democrats; some of whom spent the entirety of the COVID-19 outbreak pushing a fraudulent impeachment scheme but then again, that’s why we’re here. That fraudulent impeachment scheme was the cover for COVID-19.

We thought the entanglements continued, but apparently not. I’m actually back into this article revising this section and thanks to some help from Shazlandia. It’s been verified that Laura Birx, who is a Gates employee, is not Deborah Birx’s daughter. There were reported recent scrubs to her social media account(s) and that can be telling, which is why I initially included it and as reportedly verified by others. We’ll continue to dig on that last name.

So if this Birx – the Gates employee but not the doctor’s daughter – ends up having a familial connection, we’ll come back a fourth time and update it. Unfortunately it gets rid of my poke at HB and PP so I’m leaving it in and totally out of context and only because it feels good. > All in the family, folks, all in the family…. just ask Hunter Biden and Paul Pelosi.

Remember – not mom.

We have one more task and then we tie back to Birx and then wrap-up this behemoth article. Watch and listen closely to Attorney General Bill Barr’s comments from his recent interview with Laura Ingraham (cue to 1:40 for relevant portion):

What did Barr tell us?

1:40- Pay very close attention here because I believe that Barr tips his hand as he begins to discuss how USDOJ can actually multi-task and manage more than one matter at a time. Off-script in a seemingly impromptu moment in replying back to Ingraham, Barr states that USDOJ is able to “handle different kinds of cases.” Fair enough but listen to the direction that Barr takes it in his own word choice and with an uptick in energy from his normally reserved and patented monotone delivery. Barr quips, “Uh, maybe fraud is not on the top of their mind but we still police fraud. It’s very interesting because drugs kill 70,000 Americans a year – “seventy THOUSAND a year.”

Understand what Barr has done here and it’s genius in my honest opinion; flipping the entire construct on its head for the American people. The current US death toll for COVID-19, as documented with evidence from an abundance of sources, is fraudulent.

Here’s the play – Barr took the impetus for the lock-down (death rate) and blew it up implicitly relative to the COVID-19 death rate, which is measly by historic pandemic numbers and a fraction of the narcotics death rate cited by Barr; not to mention annual flu and pneumonia mortality. It’s important to recognize the inaccurate data sets here because they are critical in all of it; especially when you being to realize the current data sets are being manipulated to support a false narrative.

Barr essentially stated live in front of a national (global) audience, “Hey, you’re slaughtering me in the press over drug interdiction efforts when narcotics KILL 70,000 Americans per year and you SHUT DOWN THE COUNTRY AND THE ECONOMY FOR 19,701 DEATHS,” and that, Ladies and Gentleman, is called FRAUD.

Take a close and careful look at Birx here.

She knows…. F-R-A-U-D. So does Bill Barr. So do we.

As Americans near a breaking point with a locked-down country, a ravaged economy, raging cabin fever, unreasonable local authorities (in some places) and millions out of work, it seems the evidence is demonstrating that the CAUSE OF DEATH is FOR SALE. The asking price? Only a ‘new normal.’

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

*Please find the timeline at the bottom.

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

-2016-
13 Mar: Obama Executive order/Public Law 113-146 Presidential Transition

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2018-
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony, Trump/Xi sign Phase 1 trade deal
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD, NVSS issues COVID-19 diagnosis shaping memo
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

3 MUST SEE AND TELLING VIDEOS: INGRAHAM/BARR FULL INTERVIEW (with commentary) AND DR. SHIVA AYYADURAI, MIT PhD.

10 Apr 20 (TWENTY-EIGHTH article in a series)

Let’s go right to work and as we do, know that this article has been revised and re-posted so that the second part of the Barr/Ingraham interview can be captured in the same space. If you read the earlier version, the new video and commentary, which is spectacular, can be found beneath the first.

Here’s where the original article picks-back up:

Below are two videos worthy of everyone’s attention: Attorney General William Barr’s full interview with Larua Ingraham and a monologue from posted by Dr. Shiva Ayyafurai, MIT Phd. regarding his perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic, which essentially parallels much of the work in the ongoing COIVD-19 series.

Before we get into it, if you are new please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS including the hypothesis for our position at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

If you haven’t had the opportunity to take-in the last several articles, things have escalated in terms of the suspected levels of corruption and criminality coming from the President’s political enemies. Robust evidence now demonstrates the constructive elements of the predicament the President (and the nation and the globe) finds himself in while at the same time, explosive revelations are impacting the broader landscape as the FBI appears to have withheld from President Trump’s Department of Defense foreknowledge of the October 2019 COVID-19 outbreak, which the FBI even got 2 months before the World Health Organization did. How is that?

A word of caution here – don’t underestimate the ramifications of the above scenario. Distilled down, they are potentially landscape altering given that it resembles the FBI having violated its own operational directives in order to deprive the Department of Defense of critical national security intelligence, which happens to overlap FISA since one of the ancillary intelligence reports bears that marking, in order to preserve the effectiveness of a political construct inserted into President’ Trump’s incoming administration on 13 Jan 17. In other words, treason.

Let’s get to AG Barr’s interview because it’s telling. Commentary on the interview will follow.

To begin, take note of the classic Barr demeanor, which never seems to waver. I don’t know if he’s portraying, “We’re good, hold my beer, I got this” calm and cool or “Shit happens, yeah I’m concerned, but shit happens” calm and cool. I’m hoping and thinking it’s the former. Here’s the very worthy full interview:

Commentary:

The commentary here focuses on broader constitutional issues relative to the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on the aftermath.

Ingraham opens with concerns on the minds of every American and they are fundamental issues centered on basic, essential rights: freedom of worship, freedom of assembly, freedom of movement, etc. Barr appropriately replies introducing “balance” to the equation to mitigate “broad deprivations of liberty.” Reflecting to Federalism, Barr outlines his intent to oversee States relative actions. This all bodes well for Americans.

1:42- With Ingraham delves into a very nuanced but loaded question drawing the focus on local officials and authorities. Listen carefully as Ingraham introduces the topic within the context of religious gatherings and using a clip from NY Governor Andrew Cuomo. Cleverly, Ingraham is confronting Barr with evidence that local officials and authorities are overstepping Constitutional bounds and imposing their own brand of draconian measures. This is important because it speaks to the political constructs’ primary purpose, which is to transfer the President’s emergency powers away from him and into the hands of designated DSSG/MIC players like Birx and Fauci. This is an extension of that same lever playing-out at the local level. Invasion by infiltration, in other words.

Barr’s reply? Barr stands firmly and resolutely that the department will continue to mitigate encroachments by local authorities relative to appropriate and “necessary restrictions,” while pushing for alternative means for managing people in these types of scenarios.

3:23- Ingraham pushes Barr on the federal government’s restricting or eliminating Americans’ inalienable rights and again, Barr replies resolutely by saying, “that we have to be very careful to make sure… that the draconian measures being adopted are fully justified and that there are not alternative ways of protecting people.” Taking the nuanced interpretation, Barr is telling us that the department is aware of likely politically motivated overreach by Fauci and Birx germane to the devastating restrictions they imposed on the nation. Moreover, he reaffirms that the department will continue to weigh-in when local officials do overreach.

5:35- In an exchange regarding “war time” emergency powers and the “whole of government approach,” Ingraham provided significant clarity on the timing of the impact of the viral pandemic serving as the context for the political construct. She astutely indicates that normally during a “war time” scenario, both the USSC and Congress are in session but at this juncture, it’s only the Executive functioning. THINK ABOUT THAT. It speaks to the single most constructive element in all of this – that the President was intentionally left to his own to mitigate this pandemic. The pandemic is the rope. They intend to hang him with it, otherwise Congress would be in session DOING IT’S JOB TRYING TO PROTECT AMERICAN CITIZENS. Barr cleverly puts the ball back into Congress’ court acknowledging the stimulus bill and stating that they are welcome to adjust course and return to work.

Let’s interrupt the commentary to look at something I wrote last night. Here it is.

MOST IMPORTANT THING YOU’LL READ ALL DAY> Here’s the relevant question: With COVID-19 as the precedent, what will the next ‘crisis’ look like with an Obama-type in office?

6:28- Listen to Ingraham carefully as she questions Barr about PRECEDENT in consideration of “rule of law” applications during a declared emergency. For posterity’s sake, this question towers over all others. Barr’s reply speaks to President Trump’s strong executive approach that also accommodates flexibility and adaptability at the state level as aligned with Federalism, which serves as an inherent and systematic Constitutional protection; and in avoidance of the proverbial “slippery slope” that can parlay into extra-constitutional and unconstitutional encroachments.

9:30- As Barr segues from discussing border control as a way to remedy the spread of infectious disease stateside, listen carefully as he outlines yet another subtle but disastrous scenario placed in front of the President by previous corrupt and inept administrations. Specifically, Barr indicates the national security ramifications created by the virtual complete outsourcing of America’s medical supply production to China – our primary political, economic and military rival. That previous administrations let this escape us is criminal. Here are good questions to hammer home this point: 1) What would happen if China, which was/is making the bulk of coronavirus test kits, was intentionally sending test kits already contaminated with coronavirus? See Christopher Columbus, Native Americans, blankets and smallpox and 2) What if China simply refused to ship critical medical supplies?

10:05- Ingraham quetions Barr about China’s propaganda efforts and then turns to the China/US/Harvard bio-weapons smuggling scenario I’ve covered at length. Barr says, “The department is heavily engaged in that,” indicating the department’s high priority of protecting the nation against China in the realms of counterespionage and counterintelligence; also referencing the department’s “China Initiative.”

11:12- Barr directly confirms that China; not Russia, is the greater geopolitical threat “across the board.”

13:03- Ingraham questions Barr about Bill Gates’ intent to force mass vaccinations along with a “digital certificate” record of vaccination that Gates intends to make a micro-chip married to the actual vaccination. The digital certificate is a mechanism that would allow government to marginalize non-vaccinated citizens use it as the basis to deny services, entry, participation, etc. in essential societal functions (modern day serfdom, slavery, whatever you care to call it.) This is significant because Ingraham is confronting Barr on a fundamental aspect to the entire political construct. Again, Barr responds with his concern for the “slippery slope” encroaching on individual liberties and rights. Ingraham pushes Barr with another Gates quote and again, Barr revisits his long-term projected concern for the erosion of rights.

14:16- Ingraham and Barr discuss partisan aspects of the COVID-19 response; with Barr appropriately defending the President’s leadership.

15:46- Ingraham questions Barr about the likelihood of forthcoming civil unrest in the event restrictions do not ease soon. Barr acknowledges that it’s a legitimate concern and reiterates the need to open back-up both the economy and society in general; outlining the ramification of having a “cure” that is “worse than the disease.”

18:44- As it relates to the Second Amendment, Barr reaffirms that the federal government has agreed that gun stores are essential and therefore should remain open during times of emergency. Ingraham astutely follows-up with a retort about the Left’s intention to use the pandemic to reshape American society in their own view.

Here is where the new material (Barr/Ingraham) has been inserted and with the original Dr. Ayyadurai video still below.

Commentary:

The second interview segment opens with Barr confirming that they will take a pragmatic and conventional approach to managing the nation’s prison inmate population as it relates to potential releases. But then it gets very, very interesting.

1:40- Pay very close attention here because I believe that Barr tips his hand as he begins to discuss how USDOJ can actually multi-task and manage more than one matter at a time. Off-script in a seemingly impromptu moment in replying back to Ingraham, Barr states that USDOJ is able to “handle different kinds of cases.” Fair enough but listen to the direction that Barr takes it in his own word choice and with an uptick in energy from his normally reserved and patented monotone delivery. Barr quips, “Uh, maybe fraud is not on the top of their mind but we still police fraud. It’s very interesting because drugs kill 70,000 Americans a year – “seventy THOUSAND a year.”

Understand what Barr has done here and it’s genius in my honest opinion; flipping the entire construct on its head for the American people. As I write, the current US death toll is a fraudulent 19,701; and labeled as fraudulent due to the ongoing and highly suspicious manipulation of cause of death declarations (see the framing memo below.

Here’s the play – Barr takes the impetus for the lock-down (death rate) and blows it up implicitly relative to the COVID-19 death rate, which is measly by historic pandemic numbers. Barr has essentially stated live in front of an national (global) audience, “Hey, you’re slaughtering me in the press over drug interdiction efforts that KILL 70,000 Americans per year and you SHUT DOWN THE COUNTRY AND THE ECONOMY FOR 19,701 DEATHS,” and that, Ladies and Gentleman, is called FRAUD.

Here’s is the COD memo again before with conclude with the balance of Barr’s remarks.

3:13- Barr confirms that President Trump “did the right thing” in removing OIG Intelligence IG Michael Atkison for cause, citing decisions made to funnel intelligence directly to Congress with no Executive oversight.

4:11- Ingraham directly asks Barr about US Attorney John Durham’s video and Barr, stating a report will be a bi-product of his primary responsibility, which is to bring people to justice for abuses should they be demonstrated. Importantly, Barr cites the “sprawling” nature of cases like these and they take time to build.

Barr’s “own view” is that the department is not dealing with sloppiness, errors, mistakes or oversight, but an intentional pattern of actions with intent to “SABOTAGE the presidency” stating that, “If people broke the law and we can establish that with the evidence, they will be prosecuted.” Barr comments on the false predication for opening an investigation on the President’s then campaign and the pattern of apparent criminal resistance that followed him into the White House.

Barr offers that any FISA “misconduct will be discovered and discovered fairly promptly…” and concludes saying that “they” undercut the FBI in abusing the FISA process and will be prosecuted; assuring FISA safeguards moving forward.

The new material ends here and the original article picks-up again.

Here is Dr. Ayyadurai’s video presented in full and without commentary. It is worthy of a full viewing and please note that the monologue ends at 42:15 for questions.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

EXPLOSIVE – F.B.I. KNEW OF EARLY COVID-19 OUTBREAK BUT NOT TRUMP’S D.O.D.

09 Apr 20 (TWENTY-SEVENTH article in a series)

False flag political constructs are devised intentionally and deliberately to cause a ‘fog of war’ effect and they leverage the tactic of disseminating intentionally inaccurate information as a part of misinformation and disinformation strategies. Evidence is emerging that appears to have caught the FBI in the middle of a political construct and on the wrong side of President Trump’s Department of Defense; at least according to the FBI’s own protocols and regulations.

Understand that there is a reason for the deliberate ‘fog of war’ scenario sown into false flag political constructs. In simple terms, it forces the common man to default to the government’s experts as the ONLY WAY to see himself and his family out of panic and fear and back to normalcy and safety. That’s the rub.

Right now the two experts – Dr. Deborah Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci – are two Obama holdovers with long, deep, wide and dastardly entanglements across the entire federal apparatus and the elite class altogether. And THEY want you to believe it’s all by happenstance.

We can put our foot down right there otherwise, we’re being herded up for the ‘new normal’ like all of the others still drinking the Kool-Aid. In other words, if we don’t SEE THE CONSTRUCT, we become an unwitting PARTICIPANT IN THE CONSTRUCT. I’m here to help us it.

Below is a brief but incredibly revealing timeline and it will frame a critical discussion today, which focuses on how the FBI, while sitting on a mountain of evidence pertaining to US/Chinese/Harvard bio-weapons smuggling dating back to 2018, apparently did not advise Trump’s DOD about the early outbreak of COVID-19 in China in October 2019. How can that be?

As an ex officio member of the HPSCI, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would have been privy to the same intelligence at roughly the same time, but she was busy driving home a fraudulent, corrupt, criminal and unconstitutional impeachment to make sure it was done before Christmas. How can that be?

In fact, the FBI had knowledge of the outbreak two months before the WHO and yet the DOD was seemingly kept in the dark? Is that a function of bad communication or is that a function of intent? A reasonable person would ask whether that obvious disconnect between the FBI and the DOD is any way related to the existence of an ancillary intelligence report marked FISA; leading us to ask whether or not FISA could work both ways. In other words, given that the Obama administration was so confident in its ability to leverage FISA for its broader spying operation, could it have used FISA to conceal a crime? A crime like smuggling bio-weapons into China in an effort to preserve Globlalist objectives and steal the 2020 election. It’s heavy stuff. And the evidence suggests it happened.

Before we get into it, if you are new please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS including the hypothesis for our position at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

As you examine this partial and incomplete timeline, which was extracted in-part from previous work, please note that as reported previously, it braids together like a rope; and tightly – very tightly. In particular, we have to give careful consideration to how four forces converge and depict a sequence of moves and countermoves: the FBI, the WHO, China/US/Harvard bio-weapons smuggling and political forces.

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE
*2017/2018 Insertions

-2017-
11 Jan: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

13 Jan: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2018-
26 May: Chinese national with bio-materials and a centrifuge at airport in Detroit (DTW)
28 Nov: U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport (DTW) stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

-2019-
11 Sep: Chinese national with 8 vials at airport in Detroit (DTW)
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US (*ancillary intelligence report marked ‘FISA’)
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov

-2020-
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment managers announced, engrossment ceremony
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock, TRUMP RESTRICTS CHINA AIR TRAVEL
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

Like I said – it braids together like a rope. What remains for you as the reader is answering this one simple question – was that ALL BY ACCIDENT -or- ALL BY DESIGN? What follows ought to help you answer that question.

The crux of our position is simply this – the FBI came to know about the October 2019 outbreak of COVID-19 so why didn’t the DOD? For context, we have to consider what the DOD is claiming according to Fox News (SOURCE) and with EMPHASIS added,

defense official on Wednesday issued a rare denial of reports by ABC News and others that claimed a November intelligence assessment warned about a rapidly spreading coronavirus in China that posed a threat to American forces in the region.

The official said no such assessment existed.

ABC News cited unnamed officials with knowledge of the assessment by the military’s National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) that raised concerns of the coronavirus and highlighted how it was disputing daily life and business in the area.

Col. R. Shane Day, the director of the NCMI, a component of the Defense Intelligence Agency, refuted the ABC News report in a statement.

“As a matter of practice the National Center for Medical Intelligence does not comment publicly on specific intelligence matters,” he said. “However, in the interest of transparency during this current public health crisis, we can confirm that media reporting about the existence/release of a National Center for Medical Intelligence Coronavirus-related product/assessment in November of 2019 is not correct. No such NCMI product exists.”

FOX NEWS

The subtlety, nuance and finesse here is almost unbearable. Examine closely two things from DOD: 1) what is being said and 2) what is not being said.

First – what IS being said: specifically it’s this line, “….we can confirm that media reporting about the existence/release of a National Center for Medical Intelligence Coronavirus-related product/assessment in November of 2019 is not correct. No such NCMI product exists.

Fair enough – nothing from the NCMI.

Now – what is NOT being said: the DOD made no reference to any reports or advisement from the FBI regarding the October 2019 early outbreak of COVID-19.

Let’s distill this down to straight moonshine:
1- The FBI did know of the October 2019 COVID-19 outbreak (and 2 mos. before WHO)
2- The NCMI did not know of the October 2019 COVID-19 outbreak
3- The DOD did not know of the October 2019 COVID-19 outbreak

How is it that the FBI sat on all of this intelligence – the kind of intelligence that could shut down the entire country and large swaths of the globe and subsequently eviscerate an historic economy and threaten an historic presidency; all in a year that the Democrats have no new ideas; no fresh thoughts outside of all of the stale and overplayed ‘isms; no viable candidate in old, tired, corrupt and arguably drunk Joe Biden; and absolutely no shot in 2020?

Are we to understand that the FBI intentionally did not notify other requisite agencies and departments since they stand counter to their own operational directives? Is it because there was an ancillary intelligence report marked FISA and the FBI was already in hot water and under investigation for abusing that process in Obama’s broader spying operation?

Let’s consider what the FBI says about its own counterterrorism responsibilities, EMPHASIS added (SOURCE):

The FBI’s overriding priority is to protect America from terrorist attack. Our mission is to identify and disrupt potential terrorist plots by individuals or terror cells—freezing terrorist finances, sharing information with law enforcement and intelligence partners worldwide, and providing strategic and operational threat analysis to the wider intelligence community. Over the past decade, we have dramatically strengthened our ability to combat terrorism.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

If the FBI’s priorities are “to protect America from terrorist attack;” “sharing information with law enforcement and intelligence partners worldwide;” and “providing strategic and operational threat analysis to the wider intelligence community,” WHY WAS THE D.O.D. NOT ADVISED?

Did the FBI somehow forget that the Department of Defense plays a critical role in national security and terrorist attacks? Or was it perhaps that pesky FISA classification that stood as too much of an impediment to advise the department accordingly?

The FBI further delineates its responsibilities, EMPHASIS added

  • The number of intelligence analysts has doubled, and the number of linguists has tripled.
  • Threat-based fusion cells have been created to address the FBI’s top counterterrorism priorities and to ensure that the collection of intelligence is focused against priority threats, providing critical information to the Counterterrorism Division’s operational sections and FBI field offices so terrorist threats, subjects, and groups can be effectively targeted, disrupted,and dismantled.

Take a look at the second bullet point germane to what’s been outlined thus far. It sure seems the FBI simply decided to act against its own protocols in this instance, but why?

As the FBI outlines its Joint Centers participation, its hole gets deeper – much deeper. Consider, EMPHASIS added,

  • The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) integrates intelligence related to terrorism; conducts strategic operational planning; serves as a central repository for terrorism intelligence; provides government-wide intelligence support;and allows connectivity and access to IT systems/databases of participating agencies. In this milestone of information sharing, the FBI, the Central Intelligence Agency(CIA), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Capitol Police, and the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Energy, and Health and Human Services sit together and work as one team. NCTC also operates a secure website—NCTC Online—which serves as the primary dissemination system for terrorism information produced by NCTC and other counterterrorism mission partners, including international partners.
  • The Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force—comprised of personnel from the FBI, the CIA, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Department of Defenseprovides information that helps keep foreign terrorists and their supporters out of the U.S. or leads to their removal, location, detention, surveillance, or prosecution.
  • Created in 2003, the Terrorist Screening Center maintains the U.S. government’s consolidated terrorist watchlist—a single database of identifying information about those known or reasonably suspected of being involved in terrorist activity.

Moreover, the FBI’s operational response and support measures include (with EMPHASIS added), “CT Watch—the FBI’s 24/7 “threat central” for counterterrorism threat information…located within the Strategic Information and Operations Centerat FBI Headquarters and is the primary point of notification for all potential terrorist threats. Fly teams were created to respond to terrorism incidents or threats around the world.

The FBI’s own protocols and regulations explicitly state that the FBI serves in a preeminent capacity to coordinate and facilitate the sharing of counterterrorism intelligence and specifically TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. So then, I’m going to keep asking this question until it gets answered and/or folks go to prison – HOW DID THE FBI KNOW BUT THE DOD DID NOT?

Again, you have to reconcile whether that was that ALL BY ACCIDENT -or- ALL BY DESIGN? Was the FBI remiss in its duties in deciding not to apprise other relevant parties of the October 2019 COVID-19 outbreak? Was it due to the FISA overlap? Was the FBI insuring that the political construct, as outlined exhaustively and redundantly, had an opportunity to manifest and come to fruition here in the US? It sure seems it.

With no spark there is no fire. With no outbreak there is no pandemic. With no pandemic, there is no political construct. You do the math. You tell me.

Why wasn’t the DOD made aware of the October 2019 outbreak of COVID-19 and is it related to the FISA overlap?

At times like these – times of uncertainty and genuine concern for posterity’s sake – there are two things the importance of which cannot be overstated: common sense and statistical data. Right now, as you’re attempting to sort-out the FBI’s questionable handling of intelligence germane to the DOD’s dearth of the same, the ‘common sense’ hammer ought to be hitting you squarely on top of the head. It is me.

So, let’s turn our attention to the data and it’s important to recall how this political construct was devised, as I previously discussed in great detail since it closely paralleled the impeachment effort. Recall,

This hypothetical COVID-19 political construct we are exploring is no different as it too has a transfer mechanism embedded in it. Just like the House>Senate transfer opened a vector for engagement in hyper-partisan politics as it delayed and prevented due process, the Trump>Fauci/Birx transfer opened a legal portal whereby aspect of the President’s legal oversight and response authority can be justifiably transferred to others; namely Fauci and Birx. It’s Fauci and Birx who are leading-out on the oversight of pandemic response and they are doing so as partnered-up with Bill Gates and China; both funding and steering the World Health Organization. This was all as established in the Obama/Trump transition meeting on 13 Jan 17 during administrative transition meetings.

So, it’s the transfer mechanism aspect is most important. This is politics. The playing field is regulated by the broad, vast and deep body of law surrounding it and within it; and the minutia of details therein. It’s how those details are leveraged and exploited for gain that represent the finer points of playing hardball in DC. Constructing ways to trigger such a transfer of authority like we are seeing right now is a perfect example.

As we focus on the data, let’s do so by considering whom it is that’s presenting it and it’s essentially a small cohort of central players: CDC working in conjunction with the WHO, Birx and Fauci (whom I’ve branded as #FalseFlagFauci.) Having already outlined all of the parties to a large extent in previous articles, I want to spend a little more time on Fauci.

Let me be direct – Dr. Anthony Fauci entered the DSSG/MIC in 1984 under the Reagan administration and never left. He is integral to everything that is currently ongoing and I believe him to be patently dishonest and in service to higher powers. But don’t take my word for it, you can hear, see and judge him and his “data” for yourself.

For one, where was Fauci on restricting air travel from China? When I first learned of the outbreak in real time, my fist thought was that travel restrictions ought to apply given the general nature of virology and epidemiology as it relates to the reports coming out. Reaching that conclusion takes no more than a little logic and pragmatism; and it’s far from anything resembling expertise. The advice from Birx and Fauci; however, was different since air travel wasn’t restricted until 31 Jan 20 and even then, the President took xenophobic hits for it from the same critics who now question his response timing and efforts. I’d suggest that seems more amateur than expert; and certainly more politically expedient.

Why was air travel not restricted until almost February? Why didn’t the so-called experts restrict it then given their self-proclaimed levels of expertise, which they tout to a worldwide audience daily on live TV? Was it for a particular reason? Was it to ensure that the outbreak would spread stateside given established international air traffic patterns? How could a couple of “experts” in Fauci and Birx fail to immediately restrict air travel in the midst of such a virulent outbreak? Not very expert if you ask me. I digress.

Consider what the NYT wrote on April 4th and with EMPHASIS added (SOURCE),

Since Chinese officials disclosed the outbreak of a mysterious pneumonialike illness to international health officials on New Year’s Eve, at least 430,000 people have arrived in the United States on direct flights from China, including nearly 40,000 in the two months after President Trump imposed restrictions on such travel, according to an analysis of data collected in both countries.

The bulk of the passengers, who were of multiple nationalities, arrived in January, at airports in Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, Seattle, Newark and Detroit. Thousands of them flew directly from Wuhan, the center of the coronavirus outbreak, as American public health officials were only beginning to assess the risks to the United States.

NEW YORK TIMES

Whom is responsible for that? As I wrote previously and with regard to the law, President Trump is compelled to defer to his experts – Fauci and Birx – for such decisions like these. Did the experts – Fauci and Birx – hold-up the travel ban for an explicit reason? Sure seems it.

Now, recall Fauci’s Hillary Clinton email during her tenure as Secretary of State:

Does Fauci seem impartial or does he seem beholden to the President’s political enemies, which we have asserted are the same enemies responsible for this construct? It was Fauci and Birx who sent America to its proverbial bedroom with no TV and video games and with instructions not to come-out; not President Trump. It was Fauci who confronted the nation with horrific projections that resulted in the country being forced into de facto quarantine; not President Trump.

Consider these extracted quotes from a relevant Zero Hedge article (SOURCE) with EMPHASIS added,

“A few weeks ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci sat down in front of Congress and warned that millions of Americans could die if the federal government didn’t take the outbreak seriously.”

Now on Thursday, Dr. Fauci is taking to cable news to spread the message of optimism that has lifted US stocks over the past few days: Instead of the 240k figure used by President Trump as recently as two weeks ago, Dr. Fauci told NBC News that if the public continued to stick to the “mitigation efforts”, that the death toll might be as low as 60k.”

“He also warned that this outbreak is a “wake up call”, warning that more serious outbreaks might occur in the future.”

“When you’re talking about getting back to normal, we know now that we can get hit by a catastrophic outbreak like this,” he said. “It can happen again, so we really need to be prepared to respond in a much more vigorous way.”

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI

Let’s be clear on the subtext here, which is clearly pretext for something ahead of us. This may speak to the primary purpose of the COVID-19 construct altogether – indoctrinating the masses to the ‘new normal’ for future events: social distancing, societal moratoriums, quarantine, digital currency, mail-in ballots, etc. It’s a long, imposing and frightening list; at least for anyone with an appreciation for the US Constitution and individual rights and liberties.

Not only is it evident that Fauci’s data-based projections are completely off the mark, it appears to be by design. Simply, you can’t herd ‘sheeple’ without fear and panic and rolling-out such inflated numbers, which were clearly in-line for post-publication revision, did just that. Look at peoples’ behavior right now – never seen anything like it. Most importantly, Fauci told us that IT IS GOING TO HAPPEN AGAIN.

Here is the text of the notice setting forth the parameters for how data will be collected and managed pertaining to COVID-19. Understand that with the resources and the general nature of the federal apparatus, shaping, manipulating and managing data to reflect a desired scenario is a very real consideration and according to the evidence at hand, this is likely what is actually occurring because as we know, the data and the landscape just don’t comport.

The COVID-19 data being compiled and managed; especially the statistics concerning cause of death, represents a growing controversy worthy of its own article and to encompassing for the space here. The Gateway Pundit has published a number of items detailing the presumed fraudulent data manipulation and management and I encourage you to seek-out that information independently. To keep this piece manageable and it’s already long, we’re making an assumption based upon TGP’s work.

We know the data can be manipulated. That’s what we’re asserting and we’re relying on TGP to make the case, which they have, but what about Fauci? Are there indications that Fauci is acting in manipulative ways indicative of his complicity in this construct? Uh, yeah, and in abundance but, I’ll let you decide.

For context, here is a reminder of the relevant timeline (from above):
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments

Now listen to Fauci on 21 Jan 20:

Here’s Fauci on 03 Apr 20:

Oh my, that’s a WHOLESALE shift for a so-called “expert” and at this moment let’s pause for absolute clarity. Allow me to be completely direct. I’m not saying Fauci is not an expert in his field, rather I’m saying he’s a co-opted expert lying to the American public to facilitate the execution of a false flag political construct. Period. But again, it’s you deciding; not me.

The shift in Fauci’s stance is remarkable but not as remarkable as what follows. Fauci, on multiple occasions, deliberately positions himself and then overtly but subtly signals to MSM correspondents who, in each respective press conference, were adversarial to President Trump.

Am I wrong in saying that it’s awfully difficult to believe that Fauci is giving full fidelity to fighting COVID-19 as opposed to giving full fidelity to a false flag political construct devised to help the Left steal 2020 because for them, there is no other viable route BACK INTO POWER (notice I did not word that as “back into office”)?

That’s where it’s going – the handwriting is on the wall. I previously outlined 24 areas of concern and voter fraud – more appropriately termed election theft – is certainly a monumental concern with the evidence in front of us. They’re already calling for the mechanisms (mail-in, electronic, etc.). More importantly, you can see the constructive elements legislatively in that Nancy Pelosi, as they always do, began to put the legislation in place early (27 Jun 19.)

Evidence, data and common sense serve as our best filters to understand the landscape that currently surrounds us as this political construct continues to emerge with progressively more clarity. It’s clear that the data and statistics don’t fit the official narrative and that’s despite their best attempt to shape it accordingly. Moreover, common sense supported by objective evidence ought to rule the day since every grain of Dr. Anthony Fauci – from the long tenured DSSG/MIC status to the fudged data to the failed travel restrictions to the wholesale shifts in stance to overtly signaling adversarial MSM reporters – tells us that he’s complicit in something counter to the narrative he’s proffering. It all tells us he’s functioning within a false flag political construct.

We’re only left with questions. Why didn’t the FBI share imperative national security intelligence with the DOD? Why didn’t the DOD know? Why is there an overlapping FISA classification pertaining to China/US/bio-weapons smuggling? Is the FISA overlap in any way related to the broader FISA corruption under investigation? Is it in any way related to Joe Biden or any other Democrat with corrupt Chinese entanglements?

To close on a lighter note, I’ll comment on this tweet:

There are two things to consider with the post above: one is a legitimate fact and the other a legitimate opportunity.

As for the fact – I know with absolute certainty that some of the work on our site, by means of our “source,” was back-channeled “upward.” I cannot speak as to how far the work got, but it went. Take that as you may.

As for the opportunity – let’s be honest – the post was made a bit tongue-in-cheek. Yes, perhaps there was an actual reference there, but also, perhaps not. That said, I certainly wasn’t going to pass-up some free advertising; not after finding Q’s original 28 Oct 17 post in real time and having been reading, researching and writing about it ever since! Even if I had to get stretchy to bridge that gap! Cheap? Yes. Effective? Maybe!

Regardless, DRINK YOUR MOONSHINE! It imparts the power of the TRUTH!

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of article.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

QANON: POST 3724 INCLUDES A PECULIAR DATE AND COULD REFLECT A TIMELINE RELATIVE TO COVID-19 AND TODAY

Here’s an interesting drop from QAnon that I found a while back and have been meaning to share; assuming others haven’t already, and it may even be more meaningful now with additional evidence since accumulating – evidence that indicates a nefarious political angle behind COVID-19. For deeper understand there is a recent ‘update’ style article HERE

and an entire 26-article catalog HERE.

The post we’re examining is #3727 and it was posted on 18 Dec 19. For perspective on timing relative to that date, here is a timeline and as sourced in this article HERE,

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE

11 Jan 17: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)
13 Jan 17: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

-2019-
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
15 Nov: Opening of ‘Public Health Advisor/Quarantine Program’ position post (closes 15 May 20)
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach

18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump

27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment mgrs., engrossment ceremony
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

So, as you can see, this post occurred on the same day that the full House decided to impeach the President and just before the initial (the date was later revised backwards to 17 Nov 19) first report of the COVID-19 outbreak, which was 27 Dec 19; conveniently two days after Christmas.

It’s important to note – critical to note – that at this time Nancy Pelosi presumably knew of the COVID-19 outbreak by means of an FBI tactical intelligence report, which happened to have attached to it an ancillary intelligence report marked FISA; and linked to Harvard University, Chinese foreign nationals and the smuggling of bioweapons. Oh yeah, it’s a scene, man. You can learn more about the the bioweapons smuggling and the intelligence report in this article HERE

and you can learn more about Nancy Pelosi’s (and Schiff’s and Nadler’s and the rest) apparent complicity and exposure HERE and HERE.

In all of this, it’s also important what I wrote about the,

profoundly and astonishingly inadequate and incompetent performance of Nancy Pelosi in her failed and fraudulent impeachment of President Trump. Those are not exaggerations or embellishments. Even the most rudimentary scholar of civics understands that the US House of Representatives bears the sole constitutional onus to fully investigate and subsequently compile a complete case before transmitting the requisite Articles of Impeachment to the US Senate. That same scholar would also know that only the US Senate bears the sole constitutional onus of functioning as the court for the impeachment trial; understanding that investigatory aspects to any case are in no way a function of any court; rather such duties belong to law enforcement, prosecution, defense and, in this case, a designated federal body in the US House and the authority of its committees and their oversight responsibilities. (SOURCE)

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

So that’s the backdrop – let’s get to the post with EMPHASIS ADDED. As we do, our objective is to extract a timeline and it’s a potentially telling one:

#3724
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 6d572c No.7555466
It must be done right.
It must be done according to the rule of law.
It must carry weight.
It must be proven in the court of law.
There can be no mistakes.
Good things sometimes take time.
Attempts to slow/block the inevitable [Justice] will fail.
[D]s election interference 2016.
>Clinton/Hussein illegal FISA
[D]s election interference 2018.
>Mueller
[D]s election interference 2020.
>Impeachment

Projection.
These people are sick.
We, the People, are the cure.
Q

Here’s the rationale and interpretation. The President has a knack for being vindicated after being attacked for making initially accurate statements like the one’s he’s made about hydroxychloroquine; and which could be indicative of foreknowledge. For the sake of our purposes here, we’ll assume it is.

Now look at the introduction to the post speaking to doing it right, taking time, ensuring ability to prosecute, making no mistakes, etc. In the context of what people say is going on now (rumors of people being rescued from tunnels) and everything that’s occurred before it, that’s heavy stuff on a universal scale. Quite a foreboding introduction to that post.

Consider the timeline that can be extracted from this post; even if it requires rearranging and organizing:

-2016 election interference
-Obama/Clinton FISA abuse
-Attempts to block justice (all of the law suits, Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment, etc.)
-2018 midterm election interferrence
-Mueller Probe
-Impeachment
PEOPLE ARE SICK
WE (POTUS) ARE THE CURE (HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & LIKELY OTHERS)

Pretty interesting, huh; especially since I’ve written 26 articles about how COVID-19 is a false flag political construct? Pretty interesting that this specific timeline was presented to us on the very same day that Nancy Pelosi’s full U.S. House of Representatives decided to impeach the President, huh?

DOES FISA WORKS BOTH WAYS?

04 Apr 20 (TWENTY-SIXTH article in a series)

We are beginning with an immediate concession and I want to be crystal clear about it because it potentially extends an existing hypothesis for which there is an abundance of evidence – now 26 articles worth – into a direction for which there are copious questions but little in the way of actual tangible evidence. Moreover, I’m not an attorney and it’s not my area of expertise despite degrees in related fields. That said, this is another exploratory exercise to address relevant questions.

Before we get into it, if you are new please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom including the hypothesis for our position; otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

This is a bit of a longer read but it takes time to line-out and bring back together. Here’s your introduction from last evening:

If you’re looking for a backstory as to how we got to these questions below, you can refer to recent articles for deeper understanding HERE and HERE and the original article specific to the China/Harvard developments HERE.

Okay, let’s jump into the rabbit hole by establishing the foundation for our questions. Although this article mostly omits QAnon, throughout the QAnon fabric there is a considerable amount of FISA references, which I have reviewed ad nauseam; including last night and again this morning; and I didn’t even finish this morning deciding to write this instead.

If you’ve been letting Q steer your research, you, too, have been ahead of the FISA angles for a long time. Moreover, there has been a profuse amount of MSM articles speaking to the same FISA concerns. That will all serve you well here as we get into the minutia of details.

This particular article mostly sets QAnon aside and focuses on the convergence of the broader timeline, FISA abuse, Harvard University, China, bioweapons, impeachment, the President’s enemies and more; focusing on relying heavily upon more technical and legal aspects of FISA law applicable to this convergence. It will get interesting but I don’t know if we can take it beyond that with fidelity – at least not with the information we have available to us.

If we reference the ARTICLE I linked above, we take note of one very peculiar circumstance germane to Chinese nationals conspiring with a Harvard University professor to smuggle bioweapons in and out of China; and the latter not even being the part that’s most concerning! All of this is rooted in a Department of Intelligence / Federal Bureau of Investigation Tactical Intelligence Report – FBI Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate – Chemical and Biological Intelligence Unit. Note that the report dates back to 13 Nov 19, which comports with the broader, overarching timeline. Note the scope of the report – “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and “Chemical and Biological Intelligence Unit” and then recall that it overlaps with FISA, which overlaps with this entire treasonous effort ongoing since at least 2016.

This is an intelligence report that Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler presumably all had unfettered access to both BEFORE and during their efforts to focus on and drive a fraudulent impeachment. We rightfully presume this because the matter stood to SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT NATIONAL SECURITY and in the outlined areas above (WMDD/bioweapons), which fall under the purview their respective positions in the House (see point 1 below.)

Nonetheless, during this very specific time frame of this intelligence report in November of 2019, the Democrats were apparently too busy to pay attention to national security. Rather they prioritized driving a fraudulent, unconstitutional and incomplete impeachment to inexplicably be done before Christmas; only to have Pelosi peculiarly and amateurishly slam on the brakes and not transmit the actual Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for over a month. I’ve written much about this timeline (updated TIMELINE) and the insupportable nature of Pelosi’s bungled handling of it all.

This 13 Nov 19 intelligence report demonstrates two remarkable fact sets whereby the first may explain the second:

1 – It placed the FBI and presumably Pelosi, by means of her ex officio status membership to the HPSCI, and Schiff, by means of his chairmanship of that committee, and Nadler, by means of his chairmanship of the House Judiciary Committee, ALL IN A POSITION WITH FOREKNOWLEDGE OF THE COVID-19/CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK PRESUMABLY DATING BACK TO OCTOBER OF 2019 (AND YET THEY DID NOTHING WITH THAT INFORMATION.) Was that because it may have impacted an ongoing investigation, and if so, in what specific ways?
(Here’s how.)
2- Attached to the intelligence report was an ancillary intelligence report that was marked FISA; meaning that that the intelligence contained therein was acquired under the authority of FISA. The FISA process was the precise mechanism that the former corrupt Obama administration used to illegally conduct surveillance on the Trump umbrella and dating back to 2016 and most certainly even earlier.

Here is where curiosity stands to kill the cat and it is based upon five notions:

1- Our original hypothesis (see HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS below) establishes a nexus between impeachment and COVID-19.
2- FISA abuse was highly enmeshed with impeachment and served as one of the mechanisms the Democrats/Obama administration used to construct it.
3- There is a FISA overlap that may link impeachment to the China/Harvard/bioweapons scenario – we don’t know.
4- The OIG has found 29 FISA abuses as discovered from “judgmentally selected” samples taken from 8 different field offices – what did they find?
5- The FBI/DOJ still has not released all relevant FISA materials and documents – what do they have?

I want to know the details of the FISA classification in the attached ancillary intelligence report. What are they? Do they overlap the FISA abuses or the surveillance attributable to the former corrupt Obama administration spying on the Trump umbrella and likely a whole host of others?

Here’s where I get way off the rails with questions and again, I don’t know the answers here. I’m exploring this. I’m also imploring those whom may have the requisite skills, knowledge and access to do just that – determine the answers.

Based upon our assumption that the Globalists are sinking to the bottom of an S-curve as I reported HERE and HERE, it’s reasonable to state that the entire Globalist structure is eroding at the foundation and causing a ripple effect of transitional events. If convention holds, that transition would eventually lead to drastic measures by drastic folks. I’ve argued that the President has cleverly trapped these miscreants inside of their own political construct and as Winston Churchill was reported to have said, “If you’re going through hell, keep going.” I think the President may have forced them to “keep going.” We shall see.

The assumption that these Globalists did in fact keep going is a logical one as I wrote about in the last article. Losing (although they’re on a streak right now) isn’t acceptable to these people,

“Perhaps there is a reason that Hillary reportedly chose to utter these words on that fateful night, “If that fucking bastard wins, we’ll all hang from nooses.”

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

So, if they in fact kept going through hell and to their last ditch, Hail Mary play, the question becomes, “What is that Hail Mary play?” I’ve asserted it’s COVID-19 – that’s what this entire series of articles has transitioned into.

Okay, then, so how did they potentially do it? I don’t know for sure and I have no evidence beyond my suspicions, but there may be a way. First, I’d encourage you to read these three articles HERE, HERE and HERE; the former also having also been posted by QAnon. From these articles, I’ll frame it up below.

Consider this from an OIG report dated March 2020 and entitled ‘Management Advisory Memorandum for the Director of the Federal Bureau of InvestigationRegarding the Execution of Woods Procedures for Applications Filed with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to U.S. Persons‘ (SOURCE),

As a result of these findings, in December 2019, my office initiated an audit to examine more broadly the FBI’s execution of, and compliance with, its Woods Procedures relating to U.S. Persons covering the period from October 2014 to September 2019. As an initial step in our audit, over the past 2 months, we visited 8 FBI field offices of varying sizes and reviewed a judgmentally selected sample of 29 applications relating to U.S. Persons and involving both counterintelligence and counterterrorism investigations.

OIG

Look at what happened: The FISA fraud associated with the failed Mueller investigation ‘opened the door’ (looking at you, Q-types) to discovering other aspects of FISA abuse. Is THIS the selected mechanism to reveal such a drastic set of circumstances as what is outlined in our hypothesis? Was the decision to rightfully follow up on their own disastrous impeachment and use it to outline their own criminality, which then leads to a broader OIG investigation, which then envelops the originally intended target – the bioterrorism angle? Did all of this ‘boomerang’ back on them? Perhaps? (Looking at you again, Q-types.)

Here’s the relevant aspect from above, emphasis ADDED – “reviewed a judgmentally selected sample of 29 applications relating to U.S. Persons and involving both counterintelligence and counterterrorism investigations.”

Who made the judgements and on what criteria? Which cases got included in the 29 and why? Why did they “judgmentally” decide to include “counterterrorism investigations” as a part of a review designed to investigate FISA abuse perpetrated against the President, who is not accused of counterterrorism? Aside from the fact they are often entangled and inseparable from the other and that there are likely other logical and pragmatic explanations, we’ll still ask, why?

Here’s another an important fact to remember and it’s a substantial one that may impact the circumstances here. Recall that the FBI opened its investigation into President Trump as a counterintelligence one and for a very deliberate reason. That reason was to circumvent the more stringent threshold needed to establish a criminal investigation (in other words, it was a circumvention of Constitutional protections.) It still doesn’t explain the COUNTERTERRORISM angle, though, and given the WMDD/bioweapon components outlined in the FBI’s Tactical Intelligence report as overlapping the FISA classification, further scrutiny is certainly justifiable.

We know the Obama administration was having success in it’s broader spying operation with FISA and 702 abuses. Recall that I’ve long contended – as have others – that the Obama spying operation likely goes back to early in his first term. Ergo, so long as the 2016 election winner wasn’t a DSSG/MIC asset, there was always going to be something akin to what we’ve seen Trump endure since 2016.

So if the FISA mechanism was reliable, effective and controllable, why would Obama’s people decide to deviate from it? If they had something that they were already using with success and in-part because of the personnel they had put in place; then why would they deviate from that? They wouldn’t, or at least, I wouldn’t; not with the stakes at hand.

So then, is it possible that FISA works both ways and Obama and his team discovered that not only was it a great tool for spying but that due to it’s incredibly high security classification and compartmentalization, that it could also be a great cover-up mechanism?

FISA could possibly work both ways: to DISCOVER crimes -OR- to COVER crimes.

So, that’s the subjective, rationalization aspects of this consideration but what about the mechanisms and the technical aspects of it all? It hinges on this – the same weaknesses that facilitated the abuses are the same ones that could facilitate any cover-up.

Therefore, I want to know if the FISA application to the China/Harvard scenario is actually a cover-up mechanism. When you examine how the federal apparatus makes serious things go away forever (JFK, 9/11, etc.), look no further than to things like OIG reports. It often resembles something like a serious crime followed by a long and drawn-out investigation whereby the offenders admit to some mistakes and are held lightly accountable; but also that “no reasonable prosecutor” would actually pursue charges, which are then declined. Heard that before?

Here’s the important take away and again, it’s a monumental one. Understand what is actually going on in this scenario. It’s the opening of a investigation to VACUUM-UP ALL OF THE EVIDENCE AND SEAL IT AWAY FOREVER (or until those whom care are dead, I suppose.)

My point is, if Obama was abusing FISA to spy and he effectively controlled and manipulated that process confidently, could that same process have been used to hide crimes? That could be achieved by means of establishing a false predicate to open a sham investigation into specific targets – targets actually of interest to the larger operation. Or, it could even be that someone already under a 702 investigation and perhaps someone associated with the President’s enemies, contacted one of the couriers or someone from Harvard and the FISA authority extended and overlapped them. No matter and if so, it could be such that there is no intent to actually and legitimately investigate them or their activities, but rather to use the FISA classification to shield them and their activities behind the permanent veil of secrecy that a FISA classification provides.

Why wouldn’t they? These Globalists literally had nothing to lose and in order to do it, agents wouldn’t necessarily even have to defraud the FISA court.

We are focusing of section 702 of the applicable law and again relying on Jeff Carlson’s work HERE, with EMPHASIS added.

1- FISA Surveillance is a bit more complicated. Which makes FISA more susceptible to manipulation and abuse.
2- Section 702 – Subsection of Title VII – Procedures for surveillance of Foreign Persons outside the United States. Section 702 is effectively synonymous with Title VII.
3- Title VII of the FISA Act provides for the most common type of FISA surveillance.
4- Section 702 permits the government to target for surveillance foreign persons located outside the United States for the purpose of acquiring foreign intelligence information.
5- Oversight of Section 702 collection is conducted by the FISA Court, which reviews the government’s Section 702 certifications, targeting procedures and minimization procedures for compliance with statutory and Fourth Amendment requirements.
6- The DOJ’s National Security Division (NSD) maintains oversight of the Intelligence Agencies (such as the FBI) use of Section 702 authority. The NSD and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) jointly conduct reviews of the Intelligence Agencies Section 702 activities every 60 days.
7- The NSD – with notice to the ODNI – is required to report any incidents of Agency noncompliance or misconduct to the FISA Court.
8- Unlike Title I and Title III FISA surveillance, Section 702 collection is not subject to individual formal FISA Court approvals.
9- Due to frequency of collection, instead of issuing individual court orders, the FISC approves annual certifications submitted by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence that specify categories of foreign intelligence information the government is authorized to acquire pursuant to Section 702.
10- The Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence must also certify that Intelligence Community elements will follow targeting procedures and minimization procedures that are approved by the FISC as part of the annual certification.

Relevant to the extracts above, here’s the cast of players:
Foreign persons outside US: Chinese nationals
US target/s: Harvard personnel
FISA Court: overseen by Chief Justice Roberts (sole appointment authority)
Attorney General: Loretta Lynch
ODNI/NSA: James Clapper (until 20 Jan 17)> Mike Dempsy (until 16 Mar)> Dan Coats (until – 15 Aug 19)
DOJ National Security Division: John Carlin (until 15 Oct 16)> Mary McCord until Apr 17)
Intelligence/CIA: John Brennan
Intelligence/FBI: James Comey (until 09 May 17)> Andrew McCabe (until 02 Aug 17)

So the question becomes this – Is it possible that a cohort comprised of some or all of the above along with others could have conspired to use the FISA process to shield the exchange of bioweapons with China? As you consider your answer, recall the following:

1- FISA is the most extensively used type of surveillance making it the most susceptible to manipulation and abuse; also making it an entangled and nebulous environment in which to hide things.
2- The FISA parameters are contextually appropriate (foreign targets, US targets, etc.)
3- The FISA court is overseen by the USSC Chief Justice and this is important for three reasons: 1) he has sole authority to appoint all FISA judges, 2) all FISA violations get reported to him and 3) this all makes FISA a highly classified and compartmentalized CLOSED LOOP that stands behind the most stringent veil of secrecy.
4- Examining all of the players above, many already had exposure to legal jeopardy; perhaps in severe form, prior to our assertion coming to fruition; and in fact, if this assertion ever proves true, the planning aspects would have preceded the November 2019 timeline by considerable time thus backing it all up to the Obama administration.
5- 702 intelligence collections are NOT SUBJECT TO INDIVIDUAL FISA COURT AUTHORITY and this opens portals for abuse as we outlined. Instead, the authority to operate rests on an annual certificate. This equates to loose parameters, loose oversight and ample opportunity to stray far from the Constitution; even into criminal if not treasonous territory.

So, with all of that under consideration, I’ll ask you again –

If this Globalist criminal cabal defrauded the entire FISA process to target the President of the United States during his campaign, transition period and presidency under the stated objective to DISCOVER alleged crimes, then is it reasonable to think that this same cartel of criminals may have also used the same, effective, reliable and controllable FISA process to throw COVER to their criminal Hail Mary play, which hypothetically is COVID-19?

Before you answer, remember what I wrote in the last article, and I’ll leave it at that,

Three months and one day from the vote to impeach, the most historic presidency and economy the US has ever seen has been reduced to shambles….. and they want you to believe it was merely a coincidence. If you believe that, you get what you deserve. Otherwise, realize that America is being ushered-in to the next ‘new normal’ just as it was with 9/11.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of articles.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

ROBUST EVIDENCE MOUNTING THAT COVID-19 IS ANOTHER 9/11 GLOBALIST FALSE FLAG POLITICAL CONSTRUCT – The evidence is everywhere for those willing to examine it

03 Apr 20 (TWENTY-FIFTH article in a series)

Allow me to paint you a picture. Hillary Clinton’s prolific political collapse and Donald Trump’s meteoric rise and historic presidential election provide our backdrop circa 08 Nov 16. There was a reason Clinton refused to address the American public that fateful night; instead dispatching John Podesta to do the difficult, responsible, adult-level work; and almost certainly because she was too drunk to do it herself. But rather than concede and apparently because of Hillary’s position toward “mine,” she instead had Podesta issue an order to stay-tuned.

Before we get into it, if you are new please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS including the hypothesis for our position at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

Focusing on the crux date of our hypothesis – 13 Jan 17 / presidential transition meetings – remember what I wrote previously in the 11th article HERE, as it relates to then President Obama taking action to augment the presidential transition process,

First, realize this. With almost near certainty, internal polling likely informed the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton had no chance of winning the 2016 election in the months ahead. Heck, to know this all you had to do was look at the complete dearth of audience and following that she had at all of her campaign events and recalling that she essentially refused to hold any (Hillary napped through campaign season.) To the contrary, candidate Trump’s crowd sizes were akin to what we see today. Just like we know right now that the Democrats are dead in the water for 2020, it is virtually guaranteed that they knew they were dead in the water for 2016 when they passed this law on 18 Mar 16. So then, WHY did they pass it? That’s a rhetorical question.

So, we can firmly establish that the Democrats are/were dead in the water for 2020, but where does that leave them on the eve of the most significant and consequential election in US history? In a drastic position? Drastic times call for drastic measures, do they not; especially for a group that won’t quit and is facing it’s own demise?

So, here we sit locked-down apparently until June and with the Left now pushing for contingent 2020 voting options that are ripe for corruption, fraud and theft. See HERE and HERE, for example and then ask yourself if all of this all just ANOTHER coincidence.

It seems HRC was never supposed to lose and no one except for a few of us who ignored the polls and focused on campaign events and crowd sizes saw it coming. Perhaps there is a reason that Hillary reportedly chose to utter these words on that fateful night, “If that fucking bastard wins, we’ll all hang from nooses.”

Do you get the sense that losing is not an option for these people? If you don’t you should because right now their losing has the world locked down and us sitting in our homes like Bill Murray in ‘Groundhog Day’; at least hypothetically. With each passing day, though, it appears that our hypothesis is looking less and less hypothetical.

As we move forward, it is absolutely imperative to understand this very specific point – President Trump does not have the country on lock-down; with a closed and failing economy, rather Drs. Birx and Fauci do. Be sure to remember that – it’s a finer but substantial detail.

Let’s recall the most fundamental aspect in all of this, which is what the asserted political construct does, as I discussed in-depth in this article HERE. Here’s what I wrote,

What we’re really focusing on here today (and in all of this, really) is the subtlety and nuance in politics whereby one entity is leveraging legal mechanisms applicable to designated targets so as to trigger those mechanisms and cause certain, predetermined outcomes to manifest. Subsequently, the target is exposed to the dynamics of the predetermined outcome/s. When the target interfaces with those dynamics as coupled with the target’s response, the details of those events are normally used to set, adjust or alter the narrative in predetermined, chosen ways. The public’s interface with this is through the MSM – that’s the delivery point for the end product, which is essentially manufactured and shaped propaganda (see SMITH-MUNDT MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2012.)

That’s what a construct is and it’s nothing new. It’s an archaic strategy. In both cases – the COVID-19 construct (our hypothesis) and the Democrats’ failed impeachment effort – the political constructs were designed to cause a TRANSFER of authority, but in different ways; for different reasons and with entirely different outcomes, other than furthering the treasonous and seditious effort against this duly elected president. In the case of the COVID-19, the transfer functions to usurp emergency powers granted to the President of the United States while also establishing a landscape of controversy to be used to further extend the unrelenting attack on him. In the case of impeachment, the transfer functioned to impede and obfuscate that same President’s right to timely due process as a function of the broader effort to undermine and attack him and his administration as much as it worked for campaign, political and self-preservation purposes. It’s all different, but it’s all the same and it’s all rooted in transferring authority to hi-jack authority or impede it.

Factually, Russia, Ukraine and impeachment represent three sequential, transitional events and after each losing effort, this cohort of miscreants pressed forward to the next interrelated construct. That’s what these types do – they’re not like the entire literal rest of the country; or the world for that matter. Rather, this cartel plays by significantly different rules so keep that in mind because it matters in the most important ways. It’s reported that Winston Churchill once stated, “If you’re going through hell, keep going. It seems this band of miscreants kept going. No?

Then ask yourself these two very simple questions that must be taken in order:

1 – Did they keep going or did they quit after a failed impeachment?

What do you think the answer is? The evidence demonstrates that they most certainly kept going. Therefore, on the presumption that they kept going:

2- In what direction did they go?

If we agree that losing was not an option and they were compelled to continue moving forward, then in what direction did they go? If you follow it sequentially and incrementally, the gaps require little to no bridging whatsoever; rather these transitional events easily flow from one to the other and are reflective of elements of planning. TIMING can be so revealing in this way.

Look at this (incomplete) timeline below as presented and since augmented from the 24th article, which is sourced HERE. It provides for further understanding of how the actions of the WHO and the impeachment process braid together with COVID-19 like a rope. See this article HERE.

I’ve DENOTED the relevant markers but pay special attention to those denoted in RED:

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT
2019-2020 TIMELINE

11 Jan 17: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)
13 Jan 17: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.
-2019-
13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment mgrs., engrossment ceremony
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules, FAUCI> COVID NOT MAJOR THREAT
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut, FAUCI> ABC> 21 million coronavirus hospitalizations, up to 1.7 million dead
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD, NVSS issues COVID-19 diagnosis shaping memo
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed

28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: FAUCI> REVISION> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff> 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
02 Apr: Pelosi> oversight investigation> Trump ongoing pandemic response, FAUCI> CALLS FOR NATIONWIDE LOCK-DOWN
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2

12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end

11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

Looking back on all of my analysis on Russia, UKRAINE, Mueller and IMPEACHMENT; especially as it relates to the President’s enemies leveraging and finessing the finer aspects of the law; otherwise known as politics, it becomes quite simple to see the big “gotcha” trap that impeachment was. It was NOT; however, properly predicated, constitutional, based or founded and that peculiarity gave rise to greater, inexplicable concerns and outside of our hypothesis, NO ONE can explain them.

Most important in all of this and it’s essentially what I’ve done and continue to do, is that the elemental evidence can be arranged to suggest that IMPEACHMENT did not stand along. Impeaching the President was a parallel objective while the devised primary objective was to run cover for COVID-19 – the Left’s REAL OBJECTIVE. Articles HERE and HERE and HERE and a full catalog of 25 articles HERE all speak to that.

Yeah, crazy, right? Maybe not so much if folks care to take the time to examine the relevant elemental evidence, which is in abundance.

With all of that established, let’s get to the anecdotal evidence that further demonstrates that our hypothesis is less of a hypothesis and more of an ongoing investigation seeking the truth.

Here’s an article from CNN that demonstrates how the Left continually uses “science” to accomplish policy and legislative objectives. They’ve used cooked-up and fraudulent weather data for decades thus driving the mechanism to export US taxpayer money all over the globe (Globalists!) under the name of “global warming,” until their data didn’t work and they changed it to “climate change.” It’s an old recipe> establish a bullshit theory, provide a bunch of bullshit evidence to support it and then rob the American taxpayer blind like the thieving bullshit artists they are. This time though, they’re using “science” to obliterate an historic economy and lock all of us inside of our homes in hopes of stealing the White House in 2020. If you care to read that junk article entitled ‘How Fauci and Birx got Trump to listen to science,’ it is linked HERE.

Consider this article HERE from one of my top three sources, Conservative Treehouse. I outlined the Deep State entanglements and questionable actions from Birx and Fauci roughly mid-March and now CTH is coming around on the same level. That’s significant. CTH’s technical analysis is second to none. This one quote sums it up best and remember that both Fauci and Birx are Obama holdovers and long-tenured Deep State human assets that President Trump inherited,

During the coronavirus briefing on Wednesday April 1st, Dr. Fauci stated -and no media challenged him- that CDC guidelines for “stay-at-home” directives would remain in place until all new cases ceased, & deaths were no longer happening.  This could take years.

CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE

Years? Yeah, years. Fauci actually said that. That’s ABSURD.

Now consider infectious disease specialist Dr. Stephen Smith’s findings as sourced HERE at TGP. Based upon his work in East Orange, NJ, he delineates the notion that COVID-19’s infection rate seems to predominately pose a risk to overweight, diabetic-prone older citizens.

More specifically, what else do additional statistics tell us as sourced HERE at TGP? They tell us that 99% of coronavirus fatalities have pre-existing conditions and that 94% of fatalities are over age 45.

So, we see that the measures being taken are not congruent with and are historically disproportionate according to the data at hand. Here’s is more evidence of the disproportionate response being handed-down by Fauci and Birx.

Consider this quote and tweet as sourced HERE by TGP, “The IMHE study predicted over 121,000 Americans would be hospitalized by Wednesday over the Coronavirus. The actual number was 31,142.” Remember that the USNS Mercy and Comfort both have 1,000 beds and as of the time the article was written only 3 and 15 patients had been admitted, respectively.

We take note of the fact that throughout all of this – the entirety of the COVID-19 pandemic, that the WHO, which is controlled and funded primarily by two entities – Bill Gates and China – and China have routinely put up conflicting and confusing data points. We know the information is an ever-changing hot mess and it could all be by design, or so the evidence suggests.

So then, what can we learn from countries that have done it differently? What can we learn from those who took a different approach than Fauci and Birx? Let’s consider Sweden as sourced HERE by TGP.

What has Sweden done differently? That’s simple – they applied common sense and kept on trucking with an open economy like the US used to before the Globalists starting ushering in this ‘new normal’ under COVID-19.

Here is some more anecdotal evidence to consider. As you do, recall that as we speak, President Trump WAS sitting on the most historically successful administration and economy in contemporary times while the Democrats had lost Russia, Ukraine and impeachment and weren’t inclined to give-up, either. Moreover, they have no message except for identity politics and all of the “‘isms” – no new ideas; no polling numbers; no solutions; no chance; and realistically and given Joe Biden’s disastrous campaign performance thus far and on top of his prolific corruption that stands to come out, THEY DON’T EVEN HAVE A CANDIDATE.

Remember that 13 Nov 19 is an important date as outlined in this article HERE because that’s the date on the sourced intelligence report that provided the initial notice of an outbreak in the Wuhan region. This date – early to mid-November – comports with our assertion that not only did Pelosi and Schiff know about the national security ramifications of the outbreak via the intelligence report, they wittingly dismissed them in order to pursue their impeachment construct. We assert that based on the evidence, the FBI knew of the Wuhan region outbreak by at least October 2019 and in their respective positions, Schiff and Pelosi (and Nadler and the rest of them) also knew.

So between October 2019 and 27 Dec 19 (the initially reported Wuhan outbreak date), what did Adam and Nancy do? See the above timeline> the were only concerned with driving IMPEACHMENT. Why?

Now consider these these extracts with emphasis added and from this article HERE that was published on 23 Dec 19. Recall that this date is four days before the 27 Dec 19 initial Wuhan outbreak report and two days before Christmas:

Wall Street closed sharply higher on Friday, buoyed by positive development on trade war front and strong economic data. All three major stock indexes closed in the green and achieved fresh record highs. For the week also, these indexes ended in positive territory.

The Dow closed in positive territory with 22 components of the 30-stock blue-chip index closing in the green.

The tech-laden Nasdaq Composite also ended in the positive territory for the eight straight days due to strong performance of tech stocks. The S&P 500 also finished in the green. The Health Care Select Sector SPDR (XLV) gained 0.3%. Notably, eight out of 11 sectors of the benchmark index closed in the red while three finished in the green.

On Dec 20, President Donald Trump said that he had a “very good talk” with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and that a formal signing of a partial U.S.-China trade deal is being arranged. On Dec 13, both the United States and China declared that they have reached a phase-one trade deal likely to be signed by the two presidents in the first half of January.

On Dec 20, the Department of Commerce reaffirmed that the U.S. economy grew 2.1% in the third quarter of 2019. Notably, consumer spending, which constitutes 70% of the country’s GDP grew 3.2% in the third quarter, revised upward from 2.9% reported earlier. Consumer spending increased 0.4% in November, reflecting its fastest pace in four months.

Last week was a fabulous one for Wall Street. The Dow, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 1.2%, 1.5% and 2.1%, respectively. Possibility of the signing of a phase-one trade deal between the United States and China and strong economic data were primary drivers.

Four days after that economic data was published (even though the FBI, Schiff, Pelosi and others had known since at least mid-November and likely back to October), COVID-19 reportedly breaks-out in Wuhan, China. That changes everything and now we have to ask whether or not is again coincidental or by design. Consider these headlines and data points with articles linked:

Last night in real time, I posted this on social media.

It should come as no surprise that on the same day, Dr. Facui said this, and note – he sprinted to CNN of all places to directly contradict the President, which is now a pattern for him.

But what did Fauci have to say about COVID-19, the broader threat and anything that may resemble a national lock-down months before back in January?

Let’s be blunt. Yesterday’s clip is Fauci applying pressure on the President on a national platform patently antithetical to the President’s agenda and to him personally so as to coerce policy into alignment per his handlers and principals – PERIOD. Go back-up to the timeline and examine the actions towards impeachment relative to the WHO’s actions relative to those of Fauci, et al. If you don’t see the overlap, maneuvers and transitional aspects of it all, I don’t know what to tell you other than, “Enjoy the Kool-Aid.”

It gets worse.

Consider these headlines:

Millions Of Small Businesses Stunned To Learn They Are Not Eligible For Bailout Loans – ARTICLE

March Jobs Disaster: 701,000 Jobs Lost, Unemplyment Rate Soars Most In 45 Years As US Slides Into Depression – ARTICLE

And what does the Left want to do with this brand new crisis – same old crap:

It gets worse. Remember that November intelligence report citing the early notification of the Wuhan regional outbreak? Guess what? In that same report, it was indicated that a second intelligence report existed whereby the suspected smuggling of bio-weapons had been marked as FISA and therefore all of the information contained in it had been collected under FISA authority. Yeah, FISA. The question that now remains is whether that is an overlap with the FISA abuses that targeted the Trump umbrella and if so, what are those details?

On 18 Dec 19, in a mad and inexplicable rush, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and the United States House of Representatives voted to impeach President Trump. For over a month and while resting on an incomplete and shoddy case; and haggling about transferring the onus to call witnesses to the Senate, Pelosi then refused to transmit the Articles of Impeachment. Once she did, the Senate rightfully acquitted President Trump in short order on 05 Feb 20.

Three months and one day from the vote to impeach, the most historic presidency and economy the US has ever seen has been reduced to shambles….. and they want you to believe it was merely a coincidence. If you believe that, you get what you deserve. Otherwise, realize that America is being ushered-in to the next ‘new normal’ just as it was with 9/11.

We’ll end on a contextually funny note – anybody else feeling like this???

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

Hypothesis (developed over time with emerging research):
Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in this growing catalog of articles.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remdesivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

QANON: COVID-19 UPDATED TIMELINE AND PROJECTIONS

(TWENTY-FOURTH article in a series)

Let’s begin with a quick reality check: It goes without saying that the health concerns, warnings and cautions over COVID-19 should all be regarded with full fidelity – this is no time to be careless. The response to which we are all living through and being subjected to is a disproportionate one according to historical accounts of myriad other viral outbreaks, past protocols and similar scenarios.

If you’re current with this series, skip ahead.

Before we get into it, if you are new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight; especially the QAnon disclaimer.

For a quick review, here’s the underlying hypothesis that we are working to scaffold with open-source information.

Our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in-the-know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics. Since the insertion point, a mountain of correlated and interconnected evidence further propels this hypothesis as represented in the growing catalog of article.

Pick back-up here.

This article represents our ‘small team’s’ best effort to analyze the established timeline for the purpose of projecting forward a timeline of events or moments to come. The analysis below heavily relies on aspects of QAnon.

As we get into it, earlier discoveries still have our attention and they’re lined-out here for you, as sourced in this ARTICLE:

We saw a distinct change in how Q is represented dates as delineated in post #15. The dates given in that post are:
11.3
11.6

What happens if we heed Q’s implicit instructions and view these dates as expressed in military form? With no year given, it looks like this:
11.3> March 11th
11.4> April 11th
11.6> June 11th

We also have the matter of addressing the redundant 4 10 20 messaging:

*ALTERED IMAGE / NOT ORIGINAL LP#

All of the above dates of interest are marked in the timeline below by an asterisk (*) and all of the dates referenced in the ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS are highlighted, too (as shown.) First, there are two additional and critical dates to be addressed supportive of the constructive aspects of our claims as the TIMING tells us so much:

TIMELINE

11 Jan 17: Fauci makes a public statement: “During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.” (SOURCE)

– AND THEN TWO DAYS LATER –

13 Jan 17: Hypothetical insertion point for political construct during Obama/Trump transition meetings.

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT

13 Nov: DOJ/FBI Tactical Intelligence Report> China<>WMDD<>US
17 Nov: Revised (backwards) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China
05 Dec: Pelosi authorizes drafting of Articles of Impeachment
09 Dec: 21 vials stolen> Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard
10 Dec: Boston/Logan Intl. bio-hazard/China arrest, Nadler> AOIs
13 Dec: Nadler’s Judiciary Committee votes to impeach
18 Dec: Full House vote to impeach Trump
27 Dec: Initial (original) 1st COVID-19 case: Wuhan, China> 17 Nov
15 Jan: House: AOIs>Senate, impeachment mgrs., engrossment ceremony
16 Jan: Senate formally receives AOIs
20 Jan: 1st COVID-19 case: US, Senate receives AOIs
21 Jan: Senate votes on trial rules
22 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
23 Jan: Senate trial> prosecution opening arguments
24 Jan: Senate trial> pros. ends opening arg., Loeffler begins dumping stock
25 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
26 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
27 Jan: Senate trial> defense opening arguments
28 Jan: Senate trial> defense ends opening arguments
31 Jan: Bolton witness debate, Feinstein begins dumping stock
05 Feb: Senate acquits Trump

AFTER IMPEACHMENT

13 Feb: Burr dumps stock
*11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD, NVSS issues COVID-19 diagnosis shaping memo
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: Fauci> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT
30 Mar: Projected that banks would close> did not happen
31 Mar: Trump tweets “30 Days to Slow the Spread” > 4/30 > 5/1
01 Apr: Schiff announces 9/11 style COVID-19 commission, Military> cartels
03 Apr: Projected that markets would close through 13 Apr
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
*11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
12 Apr: Easter Sunday – POTUS’ initial objective end date
13 Apr: INITIAL PROJECTED END-DATE (now revised farther ahead)
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines – 30 to slow/done in 30
01 May: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end
*11 Jun: Identified date / significance unknown

Analysis & Projections: The timeline is revealing and as outlined in earlier articles, we’re examining the constructive elements of transitional events; some that overlap, some that concur and some that converge; and we’re giving a special focus to sequence.

Pelosi rushes to push an incomplete impeachment (have discussed this copiously) before Christmas and for no good reason – the vote comes down 18 Dec. At this point, the ship is out of port and isn’t coming back. That’s important.

Note that the Senate receives the AOI’s 4 days before the 20 Jan first case of COVID-19 in the US. That’s also important because it denotes that the cover construct (impeachment) for the hypothesized primary objective (COVID-19) was in place in advance as it would need to be.

The actual impeachment trial begins 22 Jan, 2 days after the 1st US COVID-19 case and Trump is then acquitted 05 Feb and with the COVID-19 construct firmly in place.

By this point, impeachment has served it’s only explainable purpose – throwing cover to COVID-19 – therefore and importantly it puts us on a different timeline; a new timeline because the dynamics of COVID-19 will now drive the schedule; not the failed and cooked-up impeachment as in prior years. THIS EXPLAINS WHY NANCY SLAMMED ON THE BRAKES AND REFUSED TO SEND THE ARTICLES TO THE SENATE. She was waiting. She was calibrating for TIMING.

At this point, 3 lawmakers have already dumped stock and things galvanize on 11 Mar with the pandemic/emergency declarations.

Like clockwork, we hit a significant indicator making good on our above notion that timelines change – the arrests in Saudia Arabia. The 15 Mar mass arrests in Saudi Arabia placed us on notice for events here . THIS IS A TRUE INDICATOR AS PREDICTED AND IT HELPS CALIBRATE THE TIMELINE MOVING FORWARD. Even aside from COVID-19, this marker would suggest forthcoming traction stateside.

Now watch what happens (sequence: 19 Mar-29 Mar.) By 19 Mar lock-downs begin (important constructive element shaped by Birx/Fauci/Team) and by 24 Mar essential personnel are moving into NORAD (important military counter.) Trump has a history of vacating the premises when threatened (Trump Tower, White House > Mar a Lago.)

By 27 Mar, Trump had nationalized GM and called-up the National Guard (important military counter.) Altogether, these represent HEAVY military considerations and potentially in response to the lock-down as handed down by Deep State assets (Birx/Fauci) – THE ENTIRE COUNTRY IS LITERALLY BEING SQUEEZED RIGHT NOW.

The following is IMPORTANT because it provides independent confirmation of the date. Research took us to a source (statistician) that predicted the peak of the virus beginning on 28 Mar, which converges with Trump’s heavy military considerations; in fact the very day after he called up the National Guard.

Then, right on cue, Deep State asset Fauci reemerges 29 Mar with his dire predictions (important constructive element.)

On 31 Mar, Trump tweets the ’30 Days’ announcement, which according to our QAnon filter is going to again re-calibrate the timeline within the construct and it fits.

So, what happens as soon as Trump resets the timeline? The next day, 01 Apr, which is TODAY, Schiff announces that he’s opening a 9/11-style commission into COVID-19 while Trump dispatches his military after Mexican drug cartels and other targets. Move, counter-move?

Recall the HEAVY MILITARY references above? This is another stride in that direction and when we pull back, whether the US is mobilizing for COVID-19 or something different matters not because the US is most certainly mobilizing and there is evidence of it everywhere (see LA trains and tanks for example.)

The 31 Mar ’30 Days’ timeline reset projects us forward to the days of 30 Apr and 01 May for an anticipated transition.

Between those two ranges of time, the two peak days of the virus, as predicted by our statistician, fall on 10 Apr and 11 Apr. It’s another convergence for us as the 10 Apr date could be related to QAnon’s redundant 4, 10, 20 messaging.

Back to our projected dates of 30 Apr and 01 May, and we again have convergence in multiple places. On 30 Apr, not only do the extended federal guidelines expire, but the [30 Days] QAnon drop projects to this same exact day (convergence.) Moreover, our statistician independently found that the next day, 01 May, the virus peak would end (convergence.)

The key word there is peak, meaning that quarantine/social isolation will be scaled back incrementally based upon infection rates in given areas rather than a wholesale, all-at-once pullback.

By 23 May our statistician has lock-downs easing and with full end date of 06 Jun.

As of this article, the Trump administration hasn’t expounded beyond the 30 Apr date so anything beyond it speculative (as is about all of this.)

Truthfully, it’s awfully difficult to know what’s going on in general, much less in these circumstances. If we default to the data in front of us, I think the dates outlined therein are possibly fairly accurate given what we know. We leave room for a faster remedy depending on prospective treatments and cures and that picture changes by the day if not the hour. We also leave room for other plausible scenarios that might speed-up the timeline and there are several plausible ones.

Lastly, we get the sense that given the broad and varied spectrum of information coming in from a host of MSM, independent media, citizen journalism and human sources, there is an undercurrent of one two things: a build up to the commencement of The Storm or the initial, clandestine aspects of that Storm. No matter, we’re mobilizing militarily and that’s significant…. good time to keep your head on swivel.

I suppose time will tell – pun intended.

SOURCE
SOURCE
SOURCE
SOURCE
SOURCE
SOURCE

*Revised/edited for correction on 02 Apr 20.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

30 Mar 20 Update: Included QAnon disclaimer below.

Requisite disclaimer: This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)