QAnon: DO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ‘YEAR OF THE RAT’ COMMENTS PROVIDE GREATER MEANING TO COVID-19 – Revisiting possible cryptic messaging with a clearer understanding of COVID-19

Back in January, a press release from the White House caught my attention due to some peculiar attention. Let’s start with a concession – I thought it was a bit of a stretch when I wrote the piece but I thought it was worthy of mentioning because you just never know….. and here we are – right back to it. It’s still stretchy, though….

To start, here’s the press release in full, (emphasis mineSOURCE):

Melania joins me in sending our warmest greetings to people in the United States and throughout the world celebrating the Lunar New Year.

On this occasion, we join millions around the globe in welcoming the Year of the Rat and embracing a new year filled with opportunities to make a positive impact in the lives of others.  As those of Asian heritage celebrate this special time of year through fireworks, food, and fellowship with loved ones, we wish them happiness, health, and prosperity in the year to come.

We also want to recognize and offer our sincerest gratitude for the many ways in which Asian Americans continue to enrich our Nation’s culture, strengthen our economy, and enhance our national defense.  Their immeasurable contributions to the United States are a unique part of our country’s history and identity.

Happy New Year!

WHITE HOUSE PRESS RELEASE – 24 JAN 20

Here’s what I wrote at that time,

The ‘national defense’ reference seemed oddly placed to me. No matter, let’s see what the Year of the Rat – 2020 – is all about. Consider this (emphasis mineSOURCE),

The Rat is the first of all zodiac animals. According to one myth, the Jade Emperor said the order would be decided by the order in which they arrived to his party. The Rat tricked the Ox into giving him a ride. Then, just as they arrived at the finish line, Rat jumped down and landed ahead of Ox, becoming first.

The Rat is also associated with the Earthly Branch (地支—dì zhī) Zi (子) and the midnight hours. In the terms of yin and yang (阴阳—yīn yáng), the Rat is yang and represents the beginning of a new day.

In Chinese culture, rats were seen as a sign of wealth and surplus. Because of their reproduction rate, married couples also prayed to them for children.

Rats are clever, quick thinkers; successful, but content with living a quiet and peaceful life.

Recent years of the Rat are: 1924, 1936, 1948, 1960, 1972, 1984, 1996, 2008, 2020.

Sourced from Chinese New Year.net

Before we press further, I found this interesting. From the sourced article, take a look at what the Chinese Zodiac says about ‘personality and characteristics’ of the RAT as it relates to President Obama’s election year in 2008 and President Trump’s in 2020.

“Good speakers” and “mood makers of a group,” but “possessive” v. “reliable” and “stable live” holding “some power” with the ability to “turn unlucky events into fortune.” Irony, huh?

So then, I haven’t been able to let go of this press release because the NATIONAL DEFENSE aspect of it seemed oddly placed despite no shortage of military allies (and enemies) in the Asian region.

Let’s reconsider that message knowing what we know today – everyone being locked down in the middle of a global viral pandemic with no cure but some promising treatments including Remesdivir and hydroxychloroquine and perhaps several others. Does this pandemic qualify as NATIONAL DEFENSE? 100% it does.

But what about RATS as it relates to NATIONAL DEFENSE how does that tie together because those are the two primary components from this peculiarly worded statement? Here’s what I found about RATS as they relate to COVID-19 (SOURCE) (SOURCE):

As with SARS, mice and rats are likely resistant to infection – that’s good from the standpoint of them not being reservoirs in the wild, but it also means they can’t be used for experimental study (as these are the most common lab animal species).

WORMS AND GERMS BLOG AS SOURCED FROM JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY

So, perhaps I was both right and wrong simultaneously – wrong in the sense of why that message was important but right in recognizing that it may have been important.

In taking a second look through a more robust lens, is it possible that President’ Trump’s statement was cryptically messaging everyone about COVID-19 but in a positive, ‘have faith’, ‘it ain’t gonna work’ way?

Now, recall that as you read this, I’ve directly tied COVID-19 to impeachment with impeachment serving primarily as the cover for COVID-19 (here’s the CATALOG of articles if you need it – it’s comprehensive, thorough and a substantial body of work.) Today’s article also speaks very heavily to it: QANON/UPDATE: IT FEELS LIKE SOMETHING IS BEGINNING TO HAPPEN – BY FAR – WEIRDEST PERIOD IN MY LIFETIME – Seems Pelosi, FBI and a bunch of others had foreknowledge… but “IMPEACHMENT”

One more consideration with this revision and thanks to Shazlandia for the information. On 16 Mar 20, by means not fully understood but presumed to be a hack, Google changed the DNC’s logo to this,

For understanding, here’s what was going on during that 16 Mar time frame as extracted directly and slightly revised from this article HERE:

11 Mar: Pandemic/emergency declaration, (DONE IN 30) > to 12 Apr.
12 Mar: Trump orders and takes-out Iranian commander
15 Mar: Saudi Arabia> mass arrests (SA –> US –> Asia –> EU), Fed rate cut
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD
25 Mar: HHS OIG announces it will investigate Trump over COVID-19
27 Mar: National Guard called-up, Trump nationalizes GM, stimulus passed
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
29 Mar: Fauci> 100s of 1000s dead, millions infected, Pelosi/attack>DJT

With those revisions edited-in for better context, I’ll pose the question again and after it, the original version of this article picks- up again. Here’s our question again – Is it possible that President’ Trump’s statement was cryptically messaging everyone about COVID-19 but in a positive, ‘have faith’, ‘it ain’t gonna work’ way?

Now, scroll back-up and re-read the two lines in Mr. Trump’s statement that were emphasized back in January and then ask yourself if it’s possible that Mr. Trump were cryptically messaging in a positive, ‘have faith’, ‘it ain’t gonna work’ way?

Maybe!

Here is the original article if you care to read it: CRYPTIC MESSAGING FROM THE WHITE HOUSE ON THE EVE OF OPENING DEFENSE ARGUMENTS? YEAR OF THE RAT AND WHAT IT MEANS

QANON/UPDATE: IT FEELS LIKE SOMETHING IS BEGINNING TO HAPPEN – BY FAR – WEIRDEST PERIOD IN MY LIFETIME – Seems Pelosi, FBI and a bunch of others had foreknowledge… but “IMPEACHMENT”

The title says enough so let’s waste no time and get right to it. I can only say that it feels like something – no matter that be something benevolent, something life-altering or something evil; perhaps a combination of two of those things – is going down. It has to be. I know that with our “small team” here, that’s the consensus.

We continue to dig deep into COVID-19 and the entire QAnon fabric relative to others’ findings and dependable news in our effort to find meaning that points to a possible trajectory for all of us. Or, in other words, answers. We believe we are beginning to hit on indicators.

The last several COVID-19-specific articles diverged in a direction that brings Nancy Pelosi squarely to the forefront and establishes an unbelievable nexus between Wuhan, the WHO, the FBI, the coronavirus outbreak and FISA. One of the discovered intelligence reports pertaining to illegal the smuggling of bio-weapons out of the country (to and from China) was comprised of information collected under FISA authority. Does that present an overlap as it relates to the Trump umbrella being illegally targeted by FISA? Does it explain the reluctance of the DOJ and FBI to release still-sealed FISA documents and does it explain why the OIG recently criticized the FBI regarding its FISA abuses; all as previously reported?

Moreover and astonishingly, this intelligence report also put knowledge of the coronavirus outbreak into the hands of the FBI over two months BEFORE the Bill Gates/China funded and controlled WHO received it. Recall, it was Barack Obama who made the WHO the relative authority when he inserted the WHO into Trump’s administration in a viral pandemic scenario that I’ve contended represents the insertion point of a political construct.

Here are extracts from that presentation (SOURCE).

This might be the most direct evidence of the political construct I’ve hypothesized thus far and it comes from the architect of the construct himself on the circle-back:

Recall what I wrote in this previous article entitled, DID OBAMA PASS A LAW AND SET-UP PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR A GLOBAL VIRAL PANDEMIC CONSTRUCT? SMOKING GUN?. Consider,

First, realize this. With almost near certainty, internal polling likely informed the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton had no chance of winning the 2016 election in the months ahead. Heck, to know this all you had to do was look at the complete dearth of audience and following that she had at all of her campaign events and recalling that she essentially refused to hold any (Hillary napped through campaign season.) To the contrary, candidate Trump’s crowd sizes were akin to what we see today. Just like we know right now that the Democrats are dead in the water for 2020, it is virtually guaranteed that they knew they were dead in the water for 2016 when they passed this law on 18 Mar 16. So then, WHY did they pass it? That’s a rhetorical question.

As Politico notes, Public Law 114-136 is described anecdotally (EMPHASIS MINE),

The gathering was held to satisfy a requirement in a 2016 law that updated the procedures around presidential transitions to require, among other things, that the outgoing administration “prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.” Obama also mentioned it in a 2016 executive order laying out his transition goals.

NAHAL TOOSI, DANIEL LIPPMAN & DAN DIAMOND – POLITICO

WHY does an outgoing President in Obama feel compelled to cast his own self-imposed authority over an incoming Trump administration? WHY is Obama issuing an executive order to further frame the transition process when there already exists original and augmented legislation that has been revised and updated over time? Perhaps we should examine what that EXECUTIVE ORDER stated in order to understand this. Consider this extract (EMPHASIS MINE),

c) The White House Transition Coordinating Council shall:

(i) provide guidance to executive departments and agencies (agencies) and the Federal Transition Coordinator regarding preparations for the Presidential transition, including succession planning and preparation of briefing materials;

(ii) facilitate communication and information sharing between the transition representatives of eligible candidates and senior employees in agencies and the Executive Office of the President, including the provision of information relevant to facilitating the personnel aspects of a Presidential transition and such other information that, in the Council’s judgment, is useful and appropriate, as long as providing such information is not otherwise prohibited by law; and

(iii) prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.

Executive Order — Facilitation of a Presidential Transition – Barack Obama

Let’s identify the important components above as it relates to the possibility of a construct. Here, Obama is resting on and further decreeing by law a compulsory process for the incoming Trump administration that is rooted in planning and preparation contingencies. This is the establishment of pretext and the insertion of the actual construct to be leveraged further down the timeline. How do we know this? Because the criticism of the President takes this precise form – sown early and reaped on time. Here it’s being sown and circa 2016; after they know they’ve already lost the upcoming election, to be reaped at a time of their choosing, which is apparently now.

That gives you a glimpse of the backstory to all of this – the work is comprehensive so in the spirit of saving time, please see the linked catalog for deeper understanding.

Now, knowing what we do, let’s get back to Obama.

It seems then President Obama slipped the noose around incoming President Elect Trump’s neck on 13 Jan 17, which is the date of the Obama/Trump transition meetings where the construct was inserted as a pandemic scenario. Recall, these transition meetings are compulsory and and rightfully so; at least with fidelity to the task at hand.

Obama then came back on 31 Mar 20 to cinch it tight by calling out President Trump in front of the entire country for not heeding the advice that was so cleverly laid-out in that pandemic scenario he outlined on 13 Jan 17.

Oh, and by the way, General Flynn was also in those transition meetings and so was Joe Biden, today’s presumed nominee for the Democratic Party (not for long – his goose is cooked.) Recall that on that day (13 Jan 17) the MSM also conveniently decided to release (TIMING!) the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story, which broke before the meetings. Just more coincidences, probably. How many is that now? How mathematically impossible is that? Did you notice that like Birx, he hailed the younger generation? That’s not an accident.

Digressing and more importantly, why is that the FBI couldn’t do something with that information considering that we’re currently in the midst of a global coronavirus pandemic? Materially, any such coronavirus outbreak would ostensibly be of national security interest and within the FBI’s purview, so then what actions if any did they take? Was there no action because that by doing so the FBI would have risked compromising an ongoing FISA investigation? Was it any way germane to the Trump/FISA dynamic and if so, in what exact ways? Again, too many coincidences to merely dismiss.

Also important to note is Pelosi’s involvement and it’s relevance via her failed and fraudulent impeachment effort, which I outlined in an article entitled NANCY PELOSI’S OWN WORDS ARE ALL WE NEED TO DEMONSTRATE COVID-19 AS A POLITICAL CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S THE EVIDENCE. Consider,

Pelosi’s position as Speaker of the House makes her an ex officio member of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which is chaired by Adam Schiff, D-CA. Accordingly, “The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence oversees the nation’s intelligence agencies including components of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, State, Treasury and Energy” (SOURCE). With oversight authority comes access to intelligence briefings; including the sort the President would have received as reported below by the Washington Post. Clearly anything that could manifest as a global viral pandemic would have been front and center in such classified briefings; the likes to which Nancy Pelosi ought to have – did have – essentially unfettered access. (SOURCE)

Now think back to what I wrote in this article entitled, INCREDIBLE EMERGING STORY LINE IMPACTS COVID-19 THEORY: Links Wuhan, intelligence reports, bio-weapons, the WHO/Bill Gates, FBI and FISA all on the same timeline. Consider,

THIS IS SIGNIFICANT – Again, we’ve thoroughly documented the Gates/WHO/China relationship and this intelligence report now puts the FBI in front of the WHO on receipt of first notice and by more than 2 months. LET ME SAY THAT AGAIN – THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION KNEW OF THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK BEFORE THE W.H.O. DID AND BY OVER TWO MONTHS.

If the FBI knew, who else knew? What about Nancy Pelosi? Did she know? Did President Trump know? Those are all good questions to ask ourselves; especially since we know that an intelligence report specific to the coronavirus put the FBI in front of the WHO.

As we have documented, the first report of COVID-19 case in Wuhan, China was 27 Dec 19 but it was later revised back to 17 Nov 19. This would put the FBI’s knowledge of the outbreak back to roughly October 2019 based upon the first report because the decision to revise the outbreak data backwards was subsequent to it all.

All of this was outlined in an intelligence report to which, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was presumably privy as an ex officio member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and presumably sometime close to October of 2019. What was Nancy doing at that time? She was driving to get impeachment done before Christmas, which they did when the vote came down on 18 Dec 19. Why? Per our hypothesis, impeachment’s primary purpose was to throw cover to COVID-19. So they got impeachment squeezed in right in time – the ORIGINAL (recall the date was later revised backwards to 17 Nov 19) case emergence in Wuhan dates to 27 Dec 19.

Nancy, why was it so important to get impeachment done before Christmas – using Christmas as the cover for the rush job? – when you had no evidence of an impeachable crime and an incomplete case that would compel you to transmit wittingly weak Articles of Impeachment to the Senate? And then you decided to slam on the breaks and refuse to transmit the Articles to the Senate for over a month – WHY? It’s so…. amateurish and you’re what, 80? So, why?

It seems to us that she did so to throw cover to COVID-19. It’s the only thing that make sense.

WHO ELSE OUT THERE IS SAYING THAT THEY HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE INSANITY OF PELOSI’S IMPEACHMENT? Nobody. Just me/us as best I can tell. But consider what I wrote previously,

We have to give attention to some aspects that affect our lens in all of this. Our first item is rooted in the profoundly and astonishingly inadequate and incompetent performance of Nancy Pelosi in her failed and fraudulent impeachment of President Trump. Those are not exaggerations or embellishments. Even the most rudimentary scholar of civics understands that the US House of Representatives bears the sole constitutional onus to fully investigate and subsequently compile a complete case before transmitting the requisite Articles of Impeachment to the US Senate. That same scholar would also know that only the US Senate bears the sole constitutional onus of functioning as the court for the impeachment trial; understanding that investigatory aspects to any case are in no way a function of any court; rather such duties belong to law enforcement, prosecution, defense and, in this case, a designated federal body in the US House and the authority of its committees and their oversight responsibilities.

No one else has really put forward a valid explanation for all of that or am I wrong? We, with our work, can account for much of it. If you think the Globalists brought down buildings on 9/11, which they most certainly did, conspiring to release a seemingly mild (controversial topic with conflicting data points and unclear information) weaponized virus that leaves the young and healthy largely unaffected is merely child’s play; so long as you have the resources: see Gilead Sciences, Unitaid, George Soros, Pinbright, Bill Gates, China, the WHO and a host of others.

If you care to dig into those details, here’s the entire catalog of COVID-19 work HERE.

Here’s another development that now comes back to us full circle and with greater clarity. Now that we know the relevance of hydroxychloroquine to the broader landscape, the suspicious deaths of BARRY & HONEY SHERMAN take on a new light since their company APOTEX specifically manufactures the drug.

Look at the date of the murders 13 DEC 17 relative to the date of the construct insertion – 13 Jan 17. It’s 11 months later to the day. Here’s a broad assumption to make but we’ll do it hypothetically so we can make a point. The timeline tells us that the construct was inserted prior to the murders. If our assertions are right, that timing would create motive if Sherman’s stance on hydroxychloroquine was not congruent with certain others’ stance on it; meaning he and Apotex were in the way.

Who thinks then that perhaps it’s plausible that Mr. Sherman got off the reservation, so to speak, and was uncooperative with certain parties? I’d argue that Seth Rich also got off the reservation when he delivered the DNC’s emails to WikiLeaks. Look, I’m not saying this occurred this way rather I’m only pointing-out ANOTHER coincidence for your consideration. Before you make up your mind, Mr. Sherman was the child of Holocaust survivors and had many philanthropic endeavors making him a likely unwilling participant in something to the level of our assertions. (SOURCE.) Unfortunately, neither he, nor his wife; or Seth Rich, are here to tell us any differently.

BREAKING item before we get into it: With a hat tip to Shazlandia, we have reports of a new viral strain breaking-out in China. Click HERE for details.

Here are the Q drops from the ‘small team’ that we think may be relative to ongoing events. Before we get into them, this recent Q-related article HERE focuses specifically on drops related to China and in an effort to gain more perspective on COVID-19. Beware that it’s a longer article with a thorough dig but it’s there for context if you need it.

#521 / 13 JAN 18
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.9
We are FIGHTING for LIFE.
We are FIGHTING for GOOD.
We are at WAR [@].
NOT EVERYTHING WILL BE CLEAN.
[SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT.
Do you TRUST the US Military?
Do you TRUST the Chain Of Command?
Have FAITH – WE ARE IN CONTROL.
PATRIOTS.
PATRIOTS DAY.
HAVE FAITH.
YOU WERE CHOSEN FOR A REASON.
YOU ARE BEING PROVIDED THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTEL TO EVER BE DROPPED PUBLICLY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
USE IT – PROTECT AND COMFORT THOSE AROUND YOU.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
Q

In particular, not only does 521 converge with the timeline that overlays all of this, it’s ‘[SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT’ that we believe is relevant here. It reads as if it’s a “necessary” benevolent event and although we leave room for that, it’s more likely not; making the efforts of the President and his administration probably reflective of their contingency plan to an anticipated scenario. The contention is that the “event” is the pandemic itself or it is related to an event within the pandemic. Take note of the date of the post – 13 Jan 18, because we’ll talk about that.

#2217 / 13 JAN 18
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 72b088 No.3093430
Anonymous ID: b48522 No.3093289
>>3093270

Trudeau, ANYTHING?
owl
>>3093289
Billionaire(s) 187.
FVEY
Safety House Build.
U1 Funnel >> Canada >> X
Q

Let’s talk about TIMING – one of my favorite tools in all of this. Look at how the the events converge; all occurring on the 13th. It’s odd, no?
13 Jan 17 – Obama/Trump transition meeting> pandemic construct inserted
13 Dec 17 – Shermans murdered> barrier to construct (11 month delta)
13 Jan 18 – [SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT. (1-year delta)
13 Jan 18 – Billionaire(s) 187.

The timing is uncanny. Everything occurred on the 13th; including Q’s drops, whereby we argue the current pandemic (scare event) is linked to the Sherman’s murders by means of the 187 reference in the drop (187 refers to homicide.)

Also notable and in certain ways supportive of our hypothesis, we have these posts below. They, too, share the same sentiment that SOMETHING FEELS LIKE IT’S HAPPENING. Notice the use of the President’s vernacular – “Phase 4” in this first post; it has meaning in the Q fabric.

*Click to open, expand and view additional Q drops relative to “phases.”

Here’s another example in the same direction.

Before we close, I’m going to provide you with this timeline from research in another ARTICLE. It could be helpful:

TIMELINE FROM INFORMATION CONTAINED IN ARTICLES:
19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines
30 Apr: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end

Looking at that and as a sidebar, Virginia holds elections on 09 Jun 20 and “Governor Black Face” has them locked down until 10 Jun 20.

We’ll leave it at that for now. Our team is still hashing-out what we think is the most likely timeline beyond what we’ve already shared. Nonetheless, we all get the sense that something is about to happen.

For posterity’s sake, we’d all better be praying that it does.

INCREDIBLE EMERGING STORY LINE IMPACTS COVID-19 THEORY: Links Wuhan, intelligence reports, bio-weapons, the WHO/Bill Gates, FBI and FISA all on the same timeline

30 Mar 20 (TWENTY-THIRD article in a series)

We’re getting right to it.

If you’re current with this series, skip ahead.

Before we get into it, if you are new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight; especially the QAnon disclaimer.

For a quick review, here’s the underlying hypothesis that we are working to scaffold with open-source information.

Again, our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in the know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

Pick back-up here.

The timeline we’re considering is the span of late-November moving into the present. We’ll do so with one bookend being the the Obama/Trump 13 Jan 17 transition meeting, where our hypothesis asserts that the political construct was inserted into the Trump administration.

With this timeline, we’re starting about 10 months down the road from that transition meeting and well before any outbreak in China, which we’ve documented back to 17 Nov 19. Here’s our primary SOURCE for this article and it makes some astonishing revelations that I’ll take the time to outline in detail. This Yahoo News Story was published today and it is landscape altering.

Consider these astonishing revelations that comport with many of our previous findings in our cataloged work (EMPHASIS mine),

WASHINGTON — In late November 2018, just over a year before the first coronavirus case was identified in Wuhan, China, U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at Detroit Metro Airport stopped a Chinese biologist with three vials labeled “Antibodies” in his luggage

The biologist told the agents that a colleague in China had asked him to deliver the vials to a researcher at a U.S. institute. After examining the vials, however, customs agents came to an alarming conclusion.

“Inspection of the writing on the vials and the stated recipient led inspection personnel to believe the materials contained within the vials may be viable Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) materials,” says an unclassified FBI tactical intelligence report obtained by Yahoo News.

YAHOO NEWS

This last underscored bit is hugely important when you consider the work around virology, coronavirus strains research, vaccine/treatment R&D and patents. It has been previously and thoroughly documented in our work in this this series.

The Yahoo story continues,

The report, written by the Chemical and Biological Intelligence Unit of the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate (WMDD), does not give the name of the Chinese scientist carrying the suspected SARS and MERS samples, or the intended recipient in the U.S. But the FBI concluded that the incident, and two other cases cited in the report, were part of an alarming pattern.

YAHOO NEWS

Pay close attention to that first underscored sentence about the WMDD – it will be very important below. For now, there’s more,

“The Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate assesses foreign scientific researchers who transport undeclared and undocumented biological materials into the United States in their personal carry-on and/or checked luggage almost certainly present a US biosecurity risk,” reads the report. “The WMDD makes this assessment with high confidence based on liaison reporting with direct access.”

YAHOO NEWS

Weapons of Mass Destruction? Ask yourself if something like a bio-engineered coronavirus strain that has artificial HIV-insertions and ties directly to MERS and SARS virology research and which was responsible for causing this current global viral pandemic for which there is an entirely disproportionate response might be considered a WMDD? It’s as if it were planned.

Relevant to all of this is my previous ARTICLE entitled, “INCREDIBLE EVIDENCE CORRELATING COVID-19 WITH POLITICAL CONSTRUCT: Dirty Harvard Professor, Spies and Wuhan, China.” As it relates to aspects of my reporting in that article, Yahoo references some of the same. Consider,

Independent of the coronavirus, the FBI’s focus on China’s biosecurity appears to be part of long-standing suspicion in the U.S. government about China’s involvement in the biological sciences. Several recent high-profile Justice Department cases involving the export of sensitive technology have involved Chinese scientists, or persons with alleged ties to the Chinese government. 

Most prominently, the Justice Department in January announced charges against Charles Lieber, the chair of Harvard’s department of chemistry and chemical biology, for concealing ties to the Chinese government. “It’s a clear-cut case of a conflict of interest, and unfortunately, it’s not an isolated incident,” said FBI special agent Joseph R. Bonavolonta, head of the Boston field office, in announcing the charges. 

YAHOO NEWS

Now consider what I reported earlier today as sourced HERE and as an extract from a list of summarized findings, and we’re focusing on the tie back to Harvard,

The academics at Harvard are recommending triggering intermittent social isolation intervals through 2022 based upon a 37.5:10,000 ratio of infection cases:adults in population. With an adult population of 209.1 million adults (18+) in the US, that projects to 784,230 cases for the entire population of adults in the US (this is not a direct parallel as this ratio would apply only within a given population center and that is likely not to include the entirety of the US.) For reference here, the US sees upwards of 45,000,000 million cases of the flu every year AND IT KILLS MORE PEOPLE THAN COVID-19 BY FAR at 12,000-61,000 (SOURCE).

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

Now consider this astonishing development and this is where the WMDD report resurfaces with great impact,

The report, which came out more than two months before the World Health Organization learned of a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan that turned out to be COVID-19, appears to be part of a larger FBI concern about China’s involvement with scientific research in the U.S. While the report refers broadly to foreign researchers, all three cases cited involve Chinese nationals.

YAHOO NEWS

THIS IS SIGNIFICANT – Again, we’ve thoroughly documented the Gates/WHO/China relationship and this intelligence report now puts the FBI in front of the WHO on receipt of first notice and by more than 2 months. LET ME SAY THAT AGAIN – THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION KNEW OF THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK BEFORE THE W.H.O. DID AND BY OVER TWO MONTHS.

If the FBI knew, who else knew? What about Nancy Pelosi? Did she know? Did President Trump know? Those are all good questions to ask ourselves; especially since we know that an intelligence report specific to the coronavirus put the FBI in front of the WHO.

REMEMBER ALL OF THIS BECAUSE IT’S ABOUT TO GET SURREAL.

As we have documented, the first report of COVID-19 case in Wuhan, China was 27 Dec 19 but it was later revised back to 17 Nov 19. This would put the FBI’s knowledge of the outbreak back to roughly October 2019 based upon the first report because the decision to revise the outbreak data backwards was subsequent to it all.

Look at the timeline during this (2019-2020) span and as sourced from a previous ARTICLE:

Note 1/11: the first report of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China is revised and backdated to appear prior to impeachment. It is imperative to understand this: 1) the impeachment process preceded COVID-19, 2) there was an inexplicable rush to push an incomplete impeachment case to the Senate before Christmas, 3) looking ahead, you’ll note that the WHO’s revision converges on the same date (28 Jan) that President Trump’s counsel rests its opening arguments (AND THE ENTIRE NATION NOW KNOWS THAT IMPEACHMENT IS A FRAUDULENT SHAM. IT WAS THIS DAY THAT THE W.H.O. DECIDED TO ANNOUNCE ITS DATA REVISION.)

*NOVEMBER 17: REVISED/BACKDATED FIRST REPORTED CASE IN WUHAN, CHINA

DECEMBER 5: HOUSE SPEAKER PELOSI AUTHORIZES DRAFTING OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

DECEMBER 10: HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN NADLER ANNOUNCES 2 ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP

DECEMBER 13: JUDICIARY COMMITTEE VOTES TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP

DECEMBER 18: HOUSE VOTES TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP

DECEMBER 25: CHRISTMAS – MAJOR HOLIDAYS ARE OFTEN UTILIZED FOR SCHEDULED EVENTS DUE TO THE GENERAL PREOCCUPATION OF MOST PEOPLE

Note 2/11: As is often the case, the announcement of the first case of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China is made in the cloud of the Christmas and New Year’s holidays; at a time when global travel is highest; and AFTER impeachment is formally in place (the vote was 18 Dec.) Timing and sequence are critical. Also notable and a little further down is that on 14 Jan, just as impeachment was being formalized, the WHO claims that human-to-human transmission is not a concern.

DECEMBER 27: COVID-19 INITIAL FIRST REPORT IN WUHAN, CHINA (SINCE REVISED BACKWARDS TO 17 NOV 19)

December 31: China reports the discovery of the coronavirus to the World Health Organization.

JANUARY 2: SENATE MAJORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER ANNOUNCES ‘DEVASTATING BLOW’ WITH NEWLY RELEASE EMAILS RELEVANT TO IMPEACHMENT

JANUARY 5: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:
Based on information provided by national authorities, WHO’s recommendations on public health measures and surveillance of influenza and severe acute respiratory infections still apply.

WHO does not recommend any specific measures for travellers. In case of symptoms suggestive of respiratory illness either during or after travel, travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their healthcare provider.

WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the current information available on this event.

(End of timeline)

Important questions to ask yourself: How does that happen? How does the above timeline unfold and converge in the backdrop of the viral outbreak while the entire time the FBI presumably knew about COVID-19, as the intelligence report suggests, and yet it did nothing?

This is where it gets surreal and perhaps this STUNNING DEVELOPMENT explains it,

In the case of the suspected SARS and MERS vials, the intelligence report cites another classified document that is marked “FISA,” meaning it contains information collected under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

YAHOO NEWS

That’s right. With everything else I’ve outlined for you, now I’ve just demonstrated that not only did the FBI know about the coronavirus outbreak before the W.H.O., which was thrust into authority by President Obama’s administration in the 13 Jan 17 transition meetings, but the FBI apparently did NOTHING WITH THAT INFORMATION that we can find. Perhaps that is because it would have been disruptive to an ONGOING INVESTIGATION; an investigation that relates to a FISA CLASSIFICATION as indicated on the intelligence report and at a time that FISA abuse was a central issue.

Is it possible that the FISA classification here overlaps the FISA abuses targeting President Trump? Is that possible? Is this why FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General William Barr have been reluctant to declassify particular aspects of FISA abuse?

Is this why Q was reiterating reminders about China being the real story all along? I wrote a piece on that, too and you can find it HERE.

Again, someone please explain to me – HOW IS THIS COVID-19 MATTER NOT A POLITICAL CONSTRUCT?

Before we close and because this is all rooted in intelligence reports (Explains John Brennan’s curious position in all of this rather well, does it not?), recall that Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House, is deeply enmeshed in intelligence; and so much so that she bears oversight authority over intelligence. With the abundance of information that you now have (and can learn from the linked article), click HERE to understand her role and to watch her appalling comments to the American people as it relates to this pandemic and President Trump.

Have a trash can handy.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

30 Mar 20 Update: Included QAnon disclaimer below.

Requisite disclaimer: This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

QAnon disclaimer: I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

PROJECTING FORWARD THROUGH CURRENT COVID-19 HEADLINES: WHAT TODAY TELLS US ABOUT TOMORROW – Detailed and Useful Timeline: Present – 06 Jun 20

30 Mar 20 (TWENTY-SECOND article in a series)

Timing, sequence and money weaved together often deliver meaning.

Today’s exercise is a simple one – examining current headlines in search for information that may portend what is to come for the country and the globe as we forge our way through this viral pandemic, which in several ways is eerily reminiscent of the events of 9/11.

In the spirit of constructive feedback implied in a complimentary re-post of an article, I’ve lined-out this article to be efficient with your time and you can decide how deep you care to go.

If you’re current with this series, skip ahead.

Before we get into it, if you are new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

For a quick review, here’s the underlying hypothesis that we are working to scaffold with open-source information.

Again, our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in the know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

Pick back-up here.

Today, we’re taking twelve headlines and important aspects from each article and sequencing them to gain a better understanding of what our short-term and long-term futures hold; including a logical timeline. We’re using an aggregate news site for our source and I selected a favorite in permanent Twitter outlaw ZERO HEDGE. ZH aggregates news/finance from a spectrum of media sources; including original content, and is a site that can lean Conservative and does lean Libertarian.

Here’s what we learn:

Our concerns regarding several big pharma corporations and their entanglements with NGOs, various national governments, the Globalists, the Democrats, George Soros and Bill Gates appear to have merit. Progressively, additional others continue to outline hypotheses similar to the one that with a voluminous amount of preceding work, we originally began to establish back on 09 Feb 20; and some twenty-one articles ago.

SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS / TIMELINE

  • As aligned with our hypothesis that has Fauci/Birx as well-established Deep State assets, Fauci counters Trump’s Easter timeline objective by projecting significant death tolls whereby Trump must and does defer by extending guidelines to 30 Apr.
  • Fear and panic are abound: NYC and its citizens demonstrate that they (and likely every other major city and its citizens) is inadequately prepared and equipped for this type of situation; while Defense moved unspecified essential personnel to NORAD (under a mountain!) and did so after nationalizing sectors of industry and finance – THOSE ARE TRADITIONAL PRECURSORY COMPONENTS TO WARFARE (much “war” rhetoric and context currently in mainstream)
  • The academics at Harvard are recommending triggering intermittent social isolation intervals through 2022 based upon a 37.5:10,000 ratio of infection cases:adults in population. With an adult population of 209.1 million adults (18+) in the US, that projects to 784,230 cases for the entire population of adults in the US (this is not a direct parallel as this ratio would apply only within a given population center and that is likely not to include the entirety of the US.) For reference here, the US sees upwards of 45,000,000 million cases of the flu every year AND IT KILLS MORE PEOPLE THAN COVID-19 BY FAR at 12,000-61,000 (SOURCE).
  • To no surprise, Bill Gates emerged supporting 10 weeks of social isolation as the Globalist’s failing agendais clinging to desperation; equating to a death spiral of increasingly drastic last attempts.
  • Many are now considering the ‘NEW NORMAL’ that a growing cohort believe is being ushered-in – their own words below are worthy.
  • As dark money emerges to attack Trump specifically on coronavirus during this critical re-election year, some wonder if Americans will ever wake-up to what is actually going on and what it may be like if these criminal Globalists are successful. One thing is certain – things will never be the same as the sheep are being herded. The authors’ own words are worthy.
  • TIMELINE FROM INFORMATION CONTAINED IN ARTICLES:
  • 19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
  • 24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD
  • 28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
  • 10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
  • 11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
  • 30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines
  • 30 Apr: Projected end date for virus peak
  • 23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
  • 06 Jun: Lock-downs end

*Graphic courtesy of Shazlandia

THE HEADLINES

If you care to gain a deeper understanding of how the above was developed, here are the annotated and sequenced headlines (each original author’s emphasis remains.) If you care to go even deeper, you can read each article by clicking ‘(SOURCE)’.

HEADLINE 1: “The Plannedemic”?
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“Bill’s (Gates) father was once the head of Planned Parenthood. He comes from a eugenics background.”

“The corrupt WHO and CDC have us controlled like puppets on strings. We obey without question. Citizens are not allowed to question medical ‘authorities’ without fearing censorship or ridicule. When the time comes for a mandatory vaccine, people will already have become conditioned to obey the medical ‘authorities,’ and it’s all going according to plan.”

Never take your eyes off government in a crisis.

HEADLINE 2: Dr. Fauci: “We’re Going To Have Millions Of Cases” And “Between 100K & 200K Deaths”
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“Dr. Fauci, officially the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a member of the White House coronavirus task force told CNN’s “State of the Union” that models suggest the coronavirus will infect millions of Americans and could kill between 100,000 to 200,000.”

“These projections are really a “moving target”, and that it’s possible the numbers could be much lower – or much higher – depending on how the US handles the response.”

“We’re going to have millions of cases.”

HEADLINE 3: White House Extends Coronavirus Guidelines Until April 30, Trump Expects “Peak” In About 2 Weeks
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“Trump seemed to back away from his push to bring the country back on-line by Easter by saying he would extend the guideline through April 30, the end of April, and roughly three weeks later than the April 12 Easter guideline.”

HEADLINE 4: Pentagon Orders Essential Staff To Deep Underground Mountain Bunker As Pandemic Prep Escalates
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“Air Force General Terrence O’Shaughnessy, who commands NORAD and NORTHCOM, told reporters… last Tuesday that essential staff is being moved from Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado to the underground bunker complex that is 24 miles away in Cheyenne Mountain. The facility is more than 2,000 feet underground and can survive a 30 megaton nuclear explosion.”

“Primary concern was … are we going to have the space inside the mountain for everybody who wants to move in there, and I’m not at liberty to discuss who’s moving in there.”

“With the virus crisis deepening in the US, confirmed cases have now surged over 124,000, with 2,191 deaths (as of Sunday morning). President Trump signed an executive order Friday, allowing the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security to activate National Guard and reservists to battle the COVID-19 outbreak across the US. “

HEADLINE 5: “I’m Terrified” – New York Turns Into “War Zone” As City’s 911 System Faces Overwhelming Onslaught
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“As New York deals with its worsening coronavirus outbreak in real time, “terrified” 911 operators find themselves having to make life-or-death decisions on a whim, on a daily basis.”

“In fact, some patients are being left behind in their homes as the healthcare system becomes overwhelmed with calls relating to the virus, according to the New York Times. “

“Paramedics said that weeks ago, coronavirus calls were mostly for respiratory distress or fever. Now many of these same patients are dealing with organ failure and cardiac arrest after being sent home from the hospital.”

HEADLINE 6: How Long Will America’s COVID-19 Lockdown Last? Here’s What The Patterns Suggest
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“A few weeks ago, I wrote about when the lockdowns and shelter in place orders would be handed down in the United States, based on the patterns we were seeing in China and in Italy. It turned out to be extremely accurate, so we can use the same general idea of using patterns to attempt to predict what happens next.”

“Expect this to continue up to and including martial law if people don’t cooperate with social distancing measures.”

“First things first – this is not going to be over in two weeks.”

“Our first major lockdowns began on March 19th. Thirty-three states have closed down non-essential businesses or mandated some type of lockdown since that time. If we base our timing on the pattern of China, the peak would have begun yesterday, March 28th. We should begin to see the curve flattening out on charts within the next few days.”

“This peak would last through about April 30th and we could see our worst days on April 10th and 11th, depending on whether we have some kind of unusual variables like both China and Italy have had.”

“On May 23rd, we could see the lockdowns become more relaxed, and if they go 77 days like Wuhan, then the lockdowns would end on June 6th.”

“This isn’t a short term event. It’s going to get worse.”

“I’m not the only person who thinks these measures could last for quite some time. According to Michael Snyder, it will be ongoing and we too could expect to see some civil unrest before this is over.”

“People should be prepared for anything from more stringent lockdowns, supply chain interruptions, and potentially even civil unrest in some areas as the situation drags on.”

HEADLINE 7: Harvard Researchers Propose “Intermittent” Lockdowns And “Widespread Surveillance” Of Americans To Avoid Critical-Care Capacity
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“The study calls for “intermittent” lockdowns and “widespread surveillance” to mitigate the spread and prevent hospital systems from being overwhelmed.”

“The study concludes by saying, “intermittent distancing measures” on 20-week intervals for specific geographical regions could be turned on and off like a water spigot through 2022.”

“As for what determines if an area should be locked down for a 20-week interval is if cases exceed 37.5 cases of the disease per 10,000 adult people in the population.”

HEADLINE 8: “It’s Super Painful” – Bill Gates Urges 10-Week Nationwide Lockdown
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates was heard on CNN Global Town Hall on Thursday (March 26) as saying six to ten weeks of lockdowns across the country is now necessary to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. “

“Gates said the response in the US was slow and chaotic. He said if the government would have “behaved a little bit like the countries that have done the best on this one” – then maybe the spread could have been suppressed.”

“The “peak” in cases and deaths is not close, indicating that further lockdowns will be needed to flatten the curve and slowdown infections to avoid hospital systems from being overwhelmed.”

HEADLINE 9: We Are All Totalitarians Now – COIVD-19 Brings Back Europe’s Spirit Of The Polis
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“The coronavirus epidemic has been highly instructive. In the face of a looming early death for millions of citizens, Western States have entered a genuine crisis in which the Schmittian sovereign – who was always there lying in waiting – has reemerged into the open and taken all the measures deemed necessary, liberty and law be damned.

Things that were declared “impossible” have become the norm.

In the face of genuine danger, the natural social condition effortlessly reasserts itself. Liberty, equality, and the “rights of man” naturally give way to the imperative of collective survival: Every man at his post!

Many have warned of the dangers of making individual entitlement the moral yardstick of nations.

It’s all well and good to understand that such a thing as civic virtue exists in times of crisis: that we are all in this together and must behave accordingly. But why does such Hellenic good sense not extend to peacetime?

Many globalists are afraid of what is to come.

“This crisis may come to be seen as the moment in which a declining and incoherent liberal-globalist West was geopolitically overtaken by an confident and organized national-authoritarian China. If so, we can also expect other countries may be tempted to change their political models.”

HEADLINE 10: Kunstler: When Americans Wake From The Corona-Coma, This Will Be A Different Country
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

Right now, we’re in the heroic phase of the battle against a modern age plague.

The fabled fog-of-war will conceal what is happening to the health care system itself, while the battle rages. After that, what?

“One thing will be pretty clear: That the folks in charge of things gave trillions of dollars to Wall Street while tens or perhaps hundreds of thousands of Covid-19 survivors got wiped out financially with gargantuan medical bills.

When Americans awake from the corona coma like millions of Rip Van Winkles, it will matter again to be upright and to act in good faith. This will be a different country.

HEADLINE 11: ‘Dark Money’ Groups & Super PACs Target Trump With Multi-Million Dollar Coronavirus Ad Campaign
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“Fueled by “dark money,” cash-flush liberal groups with ties to the Democratic Party are mobilizing to unleash millions of dollars worth of ads attacking President Donald Trump’s response to coronavirus ahead of the 2020 presidential election.”

HEADLINE 12: Will The Post-COVID-19 World Be Far Worse Than The Pre-COVID-19 World?
(SOURCE)
NOTABLE:

“Signs, especially in the United States, are that the post-coronavirus-plagued world will have even more inequality of wealth, within each nation, than existed prior to the plague.”

Only the least-corrupt nations will be able to recover fully from the current plague.

“On March 22nd, Zero Hedge headlined “‘Stop The Coronavirus Corporate Coup’: Here Is A List Of Everyone Demanding A Bail Out” and Matt Stoller listed the many different categories of mega-corporate lobbyists who were urging the Senators and Representatives, whose campaigns they fund, to bail out their respective industries.”

It’s a song-and-dance routine, performed by the two “good cop, bad cop” political Parties, in order to satisfy not only the audience (the voters) but the producers (the billionaires).

In a profoundly corrupt country, over 99% of the press will filter-out such basic details of the true extent of the corruption, because, otherwise, the revolution that results will be against the aristocracy, instead of against the public itself (and producing martial law), and a revolution like that could produce actual democracy, which the few people who fund politicians’ careers fear the most.

The public are so misinformed that they are like horses with blinders on and which are being driven by a master to whom they are expendable and replaceable, not objects of authentic and caring concern for their welfare.

These bailouts of billionaires will destroy what little was left of a democratic future for America — and for any other nation that happens to be nearly as corrupt.

Thanks to “the small team” and Shazlandia for their contributions to this piece.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to START WITH THE NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)


NANCY PELOSI’S OWN WORDS ARE ALL WE NEED TO DEMONSTRATE COVID-19 AS A POLITICAL CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S THE EVIDENCE

29 Mar 20 (TWENTY-FIRST article in a series)

Nancy Pelosi made explicit remarks that I will share with you below, which move her into a dangerously binary position where she finds herself either as equally responsible (or more so) for the domestic outbreak of COVID-19 as what she’s alleged for the President -or- she wittingly engaged in a political construct involving COVID-19. Here’s the exact evidence we need to demonstrate this and it comes from none other than Nancy Pelosi herself.

Before we get into it, if you are new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

As a quick review before we get into it,

Again, our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in the know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

First, I’ll draw your attention to Nancy rolling-out her new and best Dr. Birx impersonation as she’s ditched her former and more contemporary hairstyle for an older; perhaps more senior and motherly one; and at the same time she chose to don her revolutionary purple. This appears like Nancy remaking herself as the country foolishly becomes enamored with Deep State asset Dr. Deborah Birx. Nonetheless, Pelosi’s remarks were of poor etiquette, inappropriate and vicious.

Before we can look at the evidence, we have to establish the basis for our premise and it’s rooted in the level of intelligence that the Speaker of the House receives and its similarities to what the President receives.

Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House – we all know that. Well, as Speaker of the House, she’s privy to classified intelligence briefings and here’s how.

Pelosi’s position as Speaker of the House makes her an ex officio member of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which is chaired by Adam Schiff, D-CA. Accordingly, “The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence oversees the nation’s intelligence agencies including components of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, State, Treasury and Energy” (SOURCE). With oversight authority comes access to intelligence briefings; including the sort the President would have received as reported below by the Washington Post. Clearly anything that could manifest as a global viral pandemic would have been front and center in such classified briefings; the likes to which Nancy Pelosi ought to have – did have – essentially unfettered access. (SOURCE)

Consider what the CIA has to say about Pelosi’s ex officio status specifically germane to the sharing of intelligence (EMPHASIS mine) (SOURCE),

The leadership in each chamber–the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate and the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives–are ex officio members of their respective intelligence committees and have access to intelligence held by the committees. Typically, a member of each leader’s staff serves as liaison to the intelligence committee, keeping up with the committee’s activities and serving as a conduit for information to his or her boss. Each of these Congressional leaders also has staff responsible for national security issues who can make independent requests to the Intelligence Community for support–which may include briefings and/or written analysis. While Congressional leaders rarely have time to get involved in intelligence matters themselves, there are exceptions. Speaker Newt Gingrich, for example, has made a point of scheduling regular meetings with the DCI to cover substantive as well as operational matters.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

Here it is in one shot – Speaker Pelosi bore the onus to ensure that she either received or requested any appropriate classified briefings that could impact the country in such drastic ways relative National Security and a host of other sensitive areas; and if she did not then she bears full responsibility for it.

Consider what the Washington Post – the CIA’s mouthpiece – wrote here nine days ago (EMPHASIS mine), (SOURCE)

U.S. intelligence agencies were issuing ominous, classified warnings in January and February about the global danger posed by the coronavirus while President Trump and lawmakers played down the threat and failed to take action that might have slowed the spread of the pathogen, according to U.S. officials familiar with spy agency reporting.

The intelligence reports didn’t predict when the virus might land on U.S. shores or recommend particular steps that public health officials should take, issues outside the purview of the intelligence agencies. But they did track the spread of the virus in China, and later in other countries, and warned that Chinese officials appeared to be minimizing the severity of the outbreak.

Taken together, the reports and warnings painted an early picture of a virus that showed the characteristics of a globe-encircling pandemic that could require governments to take swift actions to contain it. But despite that constant flow of reporting, Trump continued publicly and privately to play down the threat the virus posed to Americans. Lawmakers, too, did not grapple with the virus in earnest until this month, as officials scrambled to keep citizens in their homes and hospitals braced for a surge in patients suffering from covid-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus.

WASHINGTON POST

Dear President Trump – A comet, like the one that many say caused the dinosaurs to go extinct, is going to hit the earth again in the future. We don’t know when or where and we don’t know what to do about it but if it happens, it’s going to be your fault. That’s absurd, right? Go back-up and re-read the WaPo trash – it’s the same ridiculous claim and WaPo, being the CIA’s longstanding mouthpiece (NYT serves the DOJ, FBI, etc.), even goes so far as to do all of the thinking for it’s Kool-Aid drinking audience when it decided that the matters should be “taken together.” I digress and let’s get back to it.

Did you notice how WaPo conveniently omitted all mention of the information I outlined above about intelligence sharing and the Speaker’s onus therein? Do you think WaPo’s omission was an accident? Do you think that such CIA-controlled narrative happens by chance or rather because it’s a function of a broader political construct and serves a specific purpose? Those are rhetorical questions for me.

Let’s get to Nancy’s comments – here’s the first clip:

Here’s the second clip:

Yeah, folks. That’s your Speaker of the House blaming President Trump directly for the lost lives of American COVID-19 victims; and with “blood on his hands.” (Insert my intense rage and copious profanity HERE.)

Let me remind you of what President Trump was dealing with as COVID-19 unfolded and it’s precisely why I’m contending that the hypothesis I outlined above can be supported by arranging elemental evidence in a certain way. It includes how and why impeachment’s primary purpose was to throw cover to COVID-19, which was the apparent and true long-run objective.

Below is an extract (segment of a longer timeline) from a previous ARTICLE that overlays three relevant timelines: Trump’s active COVID-19 response, the WHO and impeachment. It will give you a sense of the flow and sequence of the precise time-frame for which Speaker Pelosi chose to criticize the President. You’ll also see that it captured my relevant notes in the extract to give you a little extra context.

DECEMBER 18: HOUSE VOTES TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP

DECEMBER 25: CHRISTMAS – MAJOR HOLIDAYS ARE OFTEN UTILIZED FOR SCHEDULED EVENTS DUE TO THE GENERAL PREOCCUPATION OF MOST PEOPLE

Note 2/11: As is often the case, the announcement of the first case of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China is made in the cloud of the Christmas and New Year’s holidays; at a time when global travel is highest; and AFTER impeachment is formally in place (the vote was 18 Dec.) Timing and sequence are critical. Also notable and a little further down is that on 14 Jan, just as impeachment was being formalized, the WHO claims that human-to-human transmission is not a concern.

DECEMBER 27: COVID-19 INITIAL FIRST REPORT IN WUHAN, CHINA (SINCE REVISED BACKWARDS TO 17 NOV 19)

December 31: China reports the discovery of the coronavirus to the World Health Organization.

JANUARY 2: SENATE MAJORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER ANNOUNCES ‘DEVASTATING BLOW’ WITH NEWLY RELEASE EMAILS RELEVANT TO IMPEACHMENT

JANUARY 5: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:
Based on information provided by national authorities, WHO’s recommendations on public health measures and surveillance of influenza and severe acute respiratory infections still apply.

WHO does not recommend any specific measures for travellers. In case of symptoms suggestive of respiratory illness either during or after travel, travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their healthcare provider.

WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the current information available on this event.

January 6: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a travel notice for Wuhan, China due to the spreading coronavirus.

January 7: The CDC established a coronavirus incident management system to better share and respond to information about the virus.

JANUARY 9: PELOSI MAKES ANNOUNCEMENT STATING SHE’LL TRANSMIT ARTICLES TO SENATE SOON WHILE PINNING BLAME ON REPUBLICANS

JANUARY 10: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:
While the cause of the pneumonia seems to be a novel coronavirus, transmission potential and modes of transmission remain unclear. Therefore, it would be prudent to reduce the general risk of acute respiratory infections while travelling in or from affected areas (currently Wuhan City) by:

– avoiding close contact with people suffering from acute respiratory infections;
– frequent hand-washing, especially after direct contact with ill people or their environment;
– avoiding close contact with live or dead farm or wild animals;
– travellers with symptoms of acute respiratory infection should practice cough etiquette (maintain distance, cover coughs and sneezes with disposable tissues or clothing, and wash hands).

International traffic: no restrictions recommended

WHO does not recommend any specific health measures for travellers. It is generally considered that entry screening offers little benefit, while requiring considerable resources. In case of symptoms suggestive to respiratory illness before, during or after travel, the travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their health care provider. WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the information currently available on this event.

JANUARY 10: PELOSI MAKES STATEMENT ON TRANSMITTING ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO SENATE

January 11: The CDC issued a Level I travel health notice for Wuhan, China.

Note 3/11: Just as impeachment is formalized with the announcement of impeachment managers, the WHO issues a statement communicating that it has no concerns about human-to-human transmission, which is peculiar given its robust understanding of the very nature of coronavirus strains.

JANUARY 14: WHO DECLARES NO HUMAN-TO-HUMAN TRANSMISSION CONCERNS
Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China

JANUARY 14: PELOSI ANNOUNCEMENT ON IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS AND TIMELINE

JANUARY 15: HOUSE VOTES ON IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS

JANUARY 15: PELOSI HOLDS RARE IMPEACHMENT ENGROSSMENT CEREMONY

JANUARY 15: ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FORMALLY TRANSMITTED TO SENATE

JANUARY 16: ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FORMALLY RECEIVED IN SENATE

January 17: The CDC began implementing public health entry screening at the 3 U.S. airports that received the most travelers from Wuhan – San Francisco, New York JFK, and Los Angeles.

Note 4/11: This juncture is critical. Once again and on precisely merging vectors we have President Trump’s Articles of Impeachment being formally received in the Senate; with votes on trial rules occurring the next day, converging on the same day that COVID-19 emerges in the US for the fist time.

JANUARY 20: FIRST CONFIRMED US CASE OF CORONAVIRUS IN WA STATE

January 20: Dr. Fauci announces the National Institutes of Health is already working on the development of a vaccine for the coronavirus.

January 21: The CDC activated its emergency operations center to provide ongoing support to the coronavirus response.

JANUARY 21: SENATE VOTES ON TRIAL RULES

JANUARY 22: SENATE TRIAL / PROSECUTION OPENING ARGUMENTS

Now recall what I wrote previously about the peculiar nature of Pelosi’s brand of impeachment because it’s critical in seeing the broader picture here (EMPHASIS mine),

We have to give attention to some aspects that affect our lens in all of this. Our first item is rooted in the profoundly and astonishingly inadequate and incompetent performance of Nancy Pelosi in her failed and fraudulent impeachment of President Trump. Those are not exaggerations or embellishments. Even the most rudimentary scholar of civics understands that the US House of Representatives bears the sole constitutional onus to fully investigate and subsequently compile a complete case before transmitting the requisite Articles of Impeachment to the US Senate. That same scholar would also know that only the US Senate bears the sole constitutional onus of functioning as the court for the impeachment trial; understanding that investigatory aspects to any case are in no way a function of any court; rather such duties belong to law enforcement, prosecution, defense and, in this case, a designated federal body in the US House and the authority of its committees and their oversight responsibilities.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

What other explanation is there for why Pelosi’s pathetic impeachment was so weakly based and predicated and while at the same time, so grossly mismanaged? There isn’t a viable one that I can think of inside the scope of pragmatism, logic, and common sense.

Therefore, I’m contending that when you overlay the timelines and see the exchanges – moves and countermoves, if you will – the delay, mismanagement and peculiarity of the impeachment begins to take on clarity if you are willing to examine it through a lens that makes those characteristics deliberate outcomes. Deliberate outcomes that were designed to throw cover to a grander and entirely more effective but nefarious construct; no matter it be their original long-run objective, their Hail Mary or their contingency plan. That detail doesn’t matter because it worked flawlessly. Just go look outside.

It seems Nancy dragged impeachment along with her bizarre mismanagement because the timeline converges perfectly with the COVID-19 timeline and all the while the WHO’s (Bill Gates and China funded and controlled) odd but similar mismanagement of COVID-19 snakes through the very middle of it. But I’m sure that’s just a coincidence, huh?

Evidence suggests bio-engineered aspects to a virus that likely escaped a lab in Wuhan and therefore didn’t occur organically. Moreover, the entirety of the situation has been propagandized, leveraged and subject to misinformation and disinformation; much of that courtesy of China, the WHO and the MSM (none of those entities being friends of the American people.) Meanwhile, the response has been entirely disproportionate relative to history and other similar viral outbreaks. But I’m sure that just a coincidence, huh?

A simple man with common sense and a reasonable acumen for logical deduction might just say that the whole fake, shitty impeachment that EVERYONE knew was fake and shitty had to serve another purpose. He might conclude that TIMING tells us what we need to know; as does the money – they always do. He’d likely conclude in saying that said purpose was throwing cover to COVID-19.

Let’s get back to Nancy to close. She’s forced herself into one of two positions that are counter to one another and with no middle ground to be had in between. Ergo, Speaker Pelosi either a) is no more culpable for the outbreak of COVID-19 than the President because she had access to the same intelligence briefings and did nothing with that information – OR – b) wittingly ignored those same intelligence briefings so as not to detract from what now appears to be cover for the insertion of the COVID-19 political construct; said cover being her fraudulent and unconstitutional impeachment of President Trump.

She does not reserve the right to land in the middle of those two positions and we can no longer be tolerable of “explaining away” inconvenient fact sets. Moreover, if she doesn’t retract her statements and issue an apology to both the President and the American People, she should be put squarely and immediately into the other corner and if you ask me, not only is that where she belongs; it’s where she’s been this entire time.

If high-profile political targets are in-line to receive criminal indictments, I’d put chips on Pelosi (and her band of ‘Merry Miscreants.’)

Don’t listen to me say this is all a political construct, though, rather listen to Nancy. She told you everything you need to hear.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

If you’re brand new, there is a recommendation as to where to begin catching up posted at the very bottom.

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – This has now grown into a sizable series of articles on the COVID-19 coronavirus. Understand that all of this began simply with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

WHAT IS THE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS AND WHY MAY IT BE RELEVANT TO OUR NEAR FUTURE?

28 Mar 20

As we all sit quarantined in our homes many of us are looking for answers as to what may be ahead of us both in the short and long terms. The QAnon crowd defaults to this mode of operation as they are always researching and digging and usually with impressive results, which is why I participate.

At this point, I’ll also mention that what used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

A couple of days ago in #3900, Q posted this picture:

Okay, then. What do we know about the DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs as sourced HERE?

The Office of Justice Programs (OJP) provides innovative leadership to federal, state, local, and tribal justice systems, by disseminating state-of-the art knowledge and practices across America, and providing grants for the implementation of these crime fighting strategies. Because most of the responsibility for crime control and prevention falls to law enforcement officers in states, cities, and neighborhoods, the federal government can be effective in these areas only to the extent that it can enter into partnerships with these officers.

DOJ/OJP

The OJP also diverges into six ‘Program Offices’

It’s the last Program Office – Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking – that has our attention because it represents a main thread in the QAnon fabric: child sex trafficking (similar.)

From the OJP’s website (EMPHASIS mine),

The Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART) was authorized by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. The SMART Office assists with implementation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act and provides assistance to criminal justice professionals across the entire spectrum of sex offender management activities needed to ensure public safety.

DOJ/OJP

As a reminder, remember that it was the QAnon crowd; many of us researching long before QAnon even manifested on 28 Oct 17, that was discussing Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal entanglements well before most in the mainstream even recognized the name Jeffrey Epstein; much less his ties to many of their political idols. As I have and will continue to say, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. That said, sometimes proper deciphering gives us a glimpse into the future. This may be one of those times.

In looking at the DOJ/OJPs purview, it is the SMART Program Office that may be the context for the first real public traction which, if you’ve been following our work (small group of us), is on a very short timeline. This ARTICLE and this ARTICLE both speak to that timeline.

All things considered, it would therefore be reasonable to believe that the ball may get rolling publicly within the context of child sex-trafficking or similar, which would also comport with Jeffrey Epstein being the first real high-profile and centrally implicated fatality in all of this. Moreover, in examining OJP directives, it’s clear that local and state authorities would play a critical role since the OJP exists largely in a support and coordination capacity. That tells us requisite law enforcement efforts will have local, perhaps significantly local, components.

There are certainly other plausible directions the initial traction may take but from a psychological warfare standpoint, if the DOJ is intent on pulling the plug and draining the whole thing, they will be compelled to take a non-partisan first step. The DOJ would care to select judicial context that can bridge perhaps the largest gap to-date in the American populace and in order to do that, it has to select context that EVERYONE can stand behind regardless of party or politics.

Now ask yourself if child sex trafficking or similar might accomplish this for the DOJ. Now ask yourself if that is that why Q posted this DOJ/OJP picture? It could be. It could very well be.

No matter, we should know and we should know soon.

WHAT DOES QANON SAY ABOUT XI, CHINA AND COVID-19 AS A POLITICAL CONSTRUCT? A LOT.

28 Mar 20 (TWENTIETH article in a series)

If COVID-19 isn’t a political construct with Donald J. Trump’s administration placed squarely beneath its cross-hairs, then why did Fox Business fire host Trish Regan for suggesting the same? For something that is supposed to be apolitical, this global pandemic sure does accomplish myriad political objectives for the President’s enemies; and it does so on an incredibly coincidental but highly precise timeline. (SOURCE)

Before we get into it, if you are new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight. On a related note and as a bit of a disclaimer, I’ll once again mention this and especially for any newer readers on board here. My source reliably and consistently confirms a strong element of veracity to the actuality of QAnon; including Q’s identity, which was confirmed with a direct ask/answer as PREVIOUSLY REPORTED. It’s not my responsibility to divulge that information but I have memorialized it. Given the relationship of my source to folks inside and central to the White House, I can only encourage you to give consideration to the cryptic messaging from QAnon. In that light, I offer said encouragement strongly.

As I mentioned in the 17th article,

I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

For context, let’s review the primary hypothesis for this series of articles; understanding that we grew into this hypothesis as the research and evidence amassed. Here’s the mountain we’re standing on:

Again, our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in the know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics.

POLITICAL MOONSHINE

That’s the short version of the hypothesis.

Let’s get to the 56 posts in the Q fabric that reference China specifically. Many of those posts will be our focus as we consider extracts or full posts from each; understanding that not all will 56 appear or bear mention here. Please note that I’m trimming the fat with these drops and to the extent that I may trim fat that you believe is relevant or has meaning to today’s topic. That’s okay because today’s exercise has us staying lean and only examining the fabric for evidence of COVID-19 as an inserted political construct.

Before we get into it, let’s take a moment to reflect back on an exchange from our source that will help shape our conversation. This quote is taken from the EIGHTEENTH ARTICLE in this series and it establishes an hypothesis that is the basis for our angle that Xi, much like the President, may find himself in a battle with his own Communist brand of Deep State. Consider this (reproduced in full) with EMPHASIS added and with one minor spelling revision,

POTUS consistently refers to Xi as “My good friend”. Yet he constantly calls it a “Chinese Virus”. Seems like that would piss off his good friend. Reminder that Xi and POTUS had a 1 on 1 meeting in the Forbidden City. Never happened before. I looked back at q posts and found that in Jan of 2018…. (scare) necessary event…line was posted. Long time ago. Consider: Xi is faced with the same kind of deep state that we are. That Xi is colluding (in a good way) with POTUS to rid China of its bad actors. That rogue elements within China (with our bad actors help) released the virus in an effort to unseat Xi. Q has repeatedly said this was planned for years. It seems they knew in Jan 2018. The timeline fits too perfectly. I just 5 minutes ago heard POTUS in live press conference call it “A beautiful timeline”. The release would be an act of war against the entire world. It was already spreading when Chinese New Years was happening. Chinese allowed to travel all around the world that week. I was in Bangkok that weekend. People were already scared. I left immediately. Remember q posted in the beginning (Nov 2017) SA>US>China>EU. If that’s what happened and it’s revealed in the next few weeks it’s going to be pitchforks and torches time in China. Heads on spikes. 1 event could take out the deep state/pedos and the ChiComs at the same time. If that’s the plan it’s genius.

..add to the above. There is no doubt that China owns Biden. There is also no doubt that they would prefer Biden win the election. It’s in their best interest. Qs post yesterday mentions this.

Our lens for examining the Q drops below is shaped by the merging of these two hypotheses: that President Trump and President Xi are collaborating in a mutual fight against a broader political force manifesting in each one’s respective country as driven by the intentional release and outbreak of COVID-19.

Did Q leave anything for us in advance?

#136 / 11 Nov 17
China: The People’s Bank of China

#140 / 11 Nov 17
What is the New World Order?
Why did POTUS receive a sword dance when visiting SA?
What does this mean culturally?
Why is this relevant?
What occurred in SA?
How did POTUS remove one side of the pyramid?
What did POTUS receive while visiting China?
Where did POTUS dine?
What is the significance?
What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?

Note: We’re off to a good start. 136 is the 3rd and 140 is the 4th post in the fabric referencing China. Thy date back to very early and in fact, it appears on the 2-week anniversary of the original post 28 Oct 17. The Bank of China line from 136 gains more relevance near the end of this article – keep an eye out for it and you’ll see it relevant to 3381 below. In 140, we immediately see the broader political force mentioned – the NWO. I left the SA references i place to bridge the gap from the NWO to China, but importantly, it should be noted that the culturally relevant aspects to the SA visit give greater meaning. Consider that, “Al-Ardha used to be performed by Arab warriors prior to meeting their enemies in battle, to display weaponry, raise morale and uplift the heroic spirit of the participants.” (SOURCE) In the broader context, recall the sequence we’re considering: SA>US>China>EU. As mentioned, recall that Trump was the first US president to ever dine in the Forbidden City. From the relevant aspects of this post, we see evidence presented that supports our source’s primary hypothesis and this sets us up to seek further meaning from subsequent posts. Our next China reference doesn’t come for almost 3 exact months.

#778 / 15 Feb 18
Why is Big Pharma essential?
Expand your thinking past cures.
Think Google [new Pixel phone].

Note: There is much to consider in 778, especially since it contains a re-post; in fact, we’re ignoring much of it despite its relevance. Rather, I’m focusing on the big pharma angle and for obvious reasons; especially since we were encouraged to “expand our thinking” relative to the pharmaceutical aspect of it. Well, the entire catalog of articles is rooted in potentially nefarious big pharma entanglements to Gates, Soros, the WHO, Obama, Biden, Pelosi, the Globalists, et al., so in general so I refer you to the CATALOG. As it relates to Google and as our source reminds us, the class action lawsuit is revealing: Google shared AI technology with China and China’s military intelligence. Our source concurs with QAnon and labels Google accurately as an ‘enemy of the state.’

#809 / 22 Feb 18
Clowns revealed in China/other.
2010.
[187]
Sold intel?
HRC open source server?
[Missing emails]
[CrowdStrike]
Granted access.
Betrayed.
Only the tip.
This will be made public [soon].
Q

Note: We’re all familiar with the open server that the Clintons allegedly utilized to facilitate the flow of US state secrets to China. In this context, I draw attention to it only because the server may have been used for messaging related to COVID-19 as a construct (planning, etc.)

#953 / 17 Mar 18
Removal is the least of their problems.
Projection.
Russia>D/HRC
Twitter Bots>GOOG operated (not Russia)/Narrative & Political SLANT
BIDEN / CHINA.
BIG DEVELOPMENT.
TRAITORS EVERYWHERE.
AMERICA FOR SALE.
FLYNN.
Targeted.
Why?

Note: Here, evidence for our hypothesis mounts. We see fabricated concerns about Russia being discounted with redirection to focus on Google as the source for political censorship and narrative shaping. Moreover, Biden’s corruption in China is established firmly. Recall, Biden was involved in the 13 Jan 17 Obama/Trump transition meetings and so was Flynn; and they were scheduled to coincide with MSM revelations about the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story. Note how Q brings us back to Flynn and why he was targeted beyond the prima facie reasons.

#964 27 Mar 18
Why did Kim travel to China?
Why was travel impossible in the past?
What changed?
What constitutes the need for a F2F meeting v. secured call?
What US publicly traded co. previously entered N. Korea to establish comms?
Think logically.
WHY DID GOOG VISIT N KOREA?
WHY WOULD THE FORMER CHAIRMAN & CEO [HIMSELF] OF GOOG/ALPHABET PERSONALLY ATTEND?
Who is Sergey Brin?
Where was Sergey born?
Track the ‘FAMILY’ – IMPORTANT.
Think COLD WAR.
Think KGB.
US, China, N Korea [3].

BIDEN/CHINA VERY IMPORTANT MARKER.

Note: I draw attention to the NK, Kim and face-to-face lines for basic reasons: NK has a prolific history with biowarfare/bioengineering, Google is clearly enmeshed in nefarious activities in both NK and China and the face-to-face meeting reference could be indicative of Q asserting that perhaps something of importance may have been passed from NK to China in that meeting. So, this is a placeholder that interests us. We may have to revisit this concept at a later date and with more information at hand.

#967 / 27 Mar 18
What does the house cleaning represent?
We always knew.
Final stage.
What does NK represent?
Threat.
Safeguard.
Insurance.
POOF!
KIM TO CHINA REPRESENTS SOMETHING VITAL [KEY].
Many will be buried before exposed [them/self].
FF / DISTRACTIONS.
Q

Note: “Final stage” may be relative to “transitional events” as I previously described them. Here’s how I summarized it, “if we are to assume the President’s enemies were actively framing him; and they most certainly were, then you can guarantee that in addition to transitional events – one transitioning to the other – like we’ve seen with Russia> Mueller> Ukraine> impeachment> (COVID-19?) – that we’d also see converging timelines and concurring events.” Point being – this entire post could be reflective of the final stage in that transition process, which would be a reference to COVID-19, according to our hypothesis. The “FF (false flag) / DISTRACTIONS” certainly grabs our attention since false flag and political construct are synonymous in our argument.

#1009 / 04 Apr 18
It was not supposed to be revealed POTUS is not under criminal investigation _ NOT YET.

Note: This line has our attention because it’s indicative of the TIMING of impeachment to the timing of COVID-19 in the sense that, according to our hypothesis, impeachment was the distraction, diversion and cover story devised to pull the entire world away from what was really going on, which was the insertion of the pandemic construct. If it were revealed prematurely that President Trump were under investigation and therefore queued-up for impeachment, it would be enormously detrimental to the actual goal of inserting the pandemic construct under the cover of impeachment. Revealing prematurely that POTUS was even under investigation is significantly damaging.

#1265 / 25 Apr 18
We knew FLYNN would be challenged.
Part of the plan?
Flynn JR recent “did not lie to VP.”
Timing.
Plan.

Note: This is an interesting extract since it comports with our hypothesis and serves as an important component to it. Recall that the Obama administration and the complicit MSM timed the Obama/Trump transition meetings to coincide with the MSM’s release of the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story. Flynn was a part of those meetings, which were characterized as being out of sorts. So, while everyone in attendance was wading through the very real and palpable tension between the incoming and outgoing administrations, the outgoing administration inserted the pandemic scenario into the incoming administration and did so as the foundational aspect of the entire political construct. Part of the plan? I’d say so. A huge part. Q also uses one of my favorite words to make his point – timing!

#1884 / 15 Aug 18
SA [ACCESS] CLOSED.
EPSTEIN ISLAND [ACCESS] CLOSED.
HAITI [ACCESS] CLOSED.
NK [ACCESS] CLOSED.
CHINA [ACCESS] CLOSED.
RUSSA [ACCESS] CLOSED.
CUBA [ACCESS] CLOSED.
SUDAN [ACCESS] PENDING [GOV’T][SA US PUSH]
SYRIA [ACCESS] PENDING [GOV’T]
YEMEN [ACCESS] PENDING [GOV’T][SA US PUSH]
LIBYA [ACCESS] PENDING [MAIN PORT CLOSED][LIMITED]
SOMALIA [ACCESS] PENDING [SA US PUSH]
Q

Note: Although our focus is very narrow today, this post is indicative of a broader group entities and you’ll notice that “access” to China as been closed. We take this as a reference to Xi and Trump collaborating to close-up Deep State portals in their countries; here in China. This comports with our hypothesis.

#1983 / 29 Aug 18
Starting in 2010?
HRC Sec of State 2009 – 2013.
Coincidence?
Think Sever Access [granted]
Money talks.
[CROWDSTRIKE]
Q

Note: With posts 1959 and 1963 for perspective, which deal with China, server hacking and Dianne Feinstein’s Chinese spy of a staffer, we see greater revelations in the linked NYT article regarding a deep history of discord between US and Chinese intelligence that has cause Americans to lose their lives, the implication in 1983 is that the information was removed from the Clintons’ server and therefore, we also wonder whether anything COVID-19 related was on it.

#2351 / 05 Oct 18
Look HERE [RUSSIA]
DO NOT LOOK HERE [CHINA]

Note: A reminder to stay on course.

AT THIS POINT, I’LL REFER YOU TO THE TIMELINE I ESTABLISHED IN THE LAST ARTICLE. Please note that this timeline picks-up at 07 Nov 19 and we’ll weave aspects of into our drops and commentary below. Recall that impeachment was authorized by Nancy Pelosi on 05 Dec 19 and with the vote to impeach being held on 18 Dec 19.

#2657 / 06 Jan 19
How did HRC gain access to highest CLAS SAPs (closed system access) and able to transfer to remote/home server?

Note: Did the Clintons conspire with Google to use Google’s technical acumen to accomplish the transfer of classified and sensitive State materials to their personal unsecured server so that the Chinese could wittingly hack that information and did any of that information pertain to coronavirus and/or COVID-19? Note the convergence in the impeachment timeline and the relevance of the Clinton’s server angle as proffered by Q. As HRC’s exposure progresses, so does impeachment. Coincidence?

#2658 / 26 Jan 19
Remember when D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed mass fear that POTUS would start WWIII re: North Korea?
POTUS > PEACE on the Korean P > NO further missile tests or U enrichment.
New narrative created.
Refusal to provide coverage of successes.
Remember when D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed a stock market collapse if POTUS was elected?
POTUS E + policies > largest gains recorded in market’s history
New narrative created.
Refusal to provide coverage of successes.
[Use FED to inc rates to counter growth and project POTUS blame]
Remember when D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed complete economic collapse if POTUS was elected?
POTUS E + policies > lowest unemployment records in history + record jobs/GDP growth
New narrative created.
Refusal to provide coverage of successes.
[Deploy and use ‘racism’ ‘sexism’ and every other ….’ism’ to counter potential Black/Hispanic pop support]
Why do D’s and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] continually push the ‘IMPEACH’ narrative if impeachment requires 2/3rd SENATE VOTE TO ENACT (odds of that?)?
Do they push this FAKE NARRATIVE to project a supposed ‘supportable w/ evidence’ wrongdoing to their BASE (confirmation bias)?
Accusations never supported by facts?
Group-Think.
The list goes on and on…..
PANIC IN DC?
WHY?
WHAT WAS LOST?
POWER OF THE PURSE.
COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY.
POWER TO REPLACE SENIOR OFFICIALS WITHIN CRUCIAL GOV POSITIONS (DEPT’S) WHO CAN THEN REPLACE SR+MID+LOW POSITIONS (TRICKLE_DOWN REPLACEMENT).
POWER TO APPOINT SC JUSTICES.
(What if HRC won and appointed 2+ crooked SCJs?)
(The Last Resort)
POWER TO DIRECTLY UNDO HUSSEIN/PREV EO’S WHICH HARMED-GREATLY LIMITED THE US IN MANY VITAL/NEC WAYS.
POWER TO REBUILD THE UNITED STATES MILITARY (BACK) TO A GLOBAL SUPER POWER.
(CHINA PAYOFFS (BRIBE $) FAILURE)
POWER TO ENACT LAWS BY EO TO COMBAT AND PROTECT OUR PEOPLE.
POWER TO SHIFT FOREIGN POLICY THEREBY REDUCING OUR ENEMIES ABILITY TO PROSPER AND SOMEDAY REIGN.
(IRAN DEAL – PARIS ACCORD – CHINA TRADE – SYRIA – ………………….)
POWER TO DECLAS CRUCIAL DOCS TO PROVIDE THE PUBLIC W/ THE TRUTH (TRANSPARENCY).
POWER TO GIVE BACK POWER TO THE PEOPLE (AS INTENDED BY OUR FOUNDERS).
LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD.
…………………
Q

Note: We have to consider the above post in full. First, focus on the redundant “new narrative” aspect and how it’s used. At this point, we’re just over 2 years from the 13 Jan 17 insertion date and the landscape has changed with a “new narrative” being created at the endpoint of each transitional event. Consider the sequence of events outlined and look at how they are relative to today: peace on the Korean peninsula, stock market collapse, largest market gains in history, economic collapse, lowest historical unemployment records, highest GDP records, and the FED manipulating interest rates. You’ll notice that since COVID-19’s outbreak, the first item on that list is on shaky ground and all of the other have since been obliterated. This brings me to something I outlined in detail in the last article – why the Left would push a failed impeachment that is guaranteed to unravel on them. WHY???? I think I know the answer and it’s why we are here – re-read the hypothesis above to answer it.

#2793 / 18 Feb 19
[Zero-Day]
Countermeasures in place.
[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.

Note: This extract could be interpreted such that ‘zero-day’ refers to the outbreak whereby the EAS would be relevant so as to facilitate effective communication with Americans during such a time. Although the revised outbreak date in Wuhan was 17 Nov 19, the initial first report in real time had the outbreak as 27 Dec 19. Regardless, this post precedes both dates by months. All of this is unfolding during the time that Pelosi rushed to impeach by Christmas and then slammed on the brakes and failed to transmit the Articles to the Senate for over a month. This all overlaps the China/Bill Gates controlled WHO revising its position on the outbreak numerous times and in ways that present as questionable and ineffective in terms of working to suppress infection rates with reasonable precautions. The WHO then goes on to declare a data revision on 28 Jan – the same day that the President’s counsel rested it opening arguments. Moving forward (see the linked timeline), the WHO finally revises it’s travel recommendations but not until AFTER the President is acquitted on 05 Feb. The WHO will again revise travel on 2/29 and eventually declare the event a pandemic on 3/11.

#3381 / 08 Jul 19
Example:
Joe Biden (Vice President of the United States)
>Follow the Family
Corruption in DC > How to Get Rich
Are Liberals willfully blind or ……….?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/15b-contract-in-iraq-for-bidens-little-brother-exposes-obama-ahead-of-debate
Biden’s brother $1.5b contract in Iraq.
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/
Biden’s son $1.5b deal w/ China.
Coincidence?
DRAIN THE SWAMP.
Q

Note: Again, we know that Joe Biden and is family is key to all of this and the level of corruption that Biden established in China will eventually be shown as historic. From our source as it relates to Biden, “Bidens raise money from China. Keep in mind I was in the [redacted for privacy: profession.] Guys I worked (dozens) with had stellar 20 year track records. All tried to raise money from China. Nothing. Ever. Yet fresh out of a dishonorable discharge (couple of months) for doing coke, Hunter Biden flys on AF2 with his dad to China. Gets off the plane and Joe introduces him to a guy from the Bank Of China. The Chinese governments central bank. Flies with a billion dollar commitment. They (China) added $500 million later after they saw the scheme would work. Much later Joe is asked if he knew about what had transpired. He said he never talked about it with Hunter. It’s a 16 hour and 38 minute flight. There are pictures of them coming off the plane in Beijing. 3 people are on it. Joe, Hunter and 1 women. I’m pretty confident Joe won’t be POTUS. The good guys are just waiting for the right time to blow him up.” Notice that I alluded to the Bank of China aspect of this in the first note box above.

#3501 / 25 Jul 19
Possible China monitored [MUELLER] hearing?
Possible China analyzing likelihood of POTUS re_ELEC 2020?
Possible China taking steps [think propaganda] to harm POTUS re: 2020?
Possible China in sec_comms w/ D candidate(s) running for President re: re-institute US piggy-bank?
Possible China in sec_comms w/ former D_party senior officials re: re-institute US piggy-bank?
Possible China put extreme [threatening?] pressure on NK the day of the [MUELLER] hearing (coincidence?) should hearing swing to POTUS?
Possible acts were taken in effort to diminish (lessen) D_blow?
Possible acts were taken in effort to ‘change the narrative’?
Define ‘False Flag’.
Q

Note: This post begins to pick-up heavily on overtones related to our hypothesis. Of course China’s intelligence agencies were closely monitoring political developments in the US and they most certainly have a handle on President Trump’s prospects for 2020 (we all do – it’s why we’re here.) Although it’s subjective, we can begin to stitch together various components for meaning. It’s being implied that Biden is the US candidate that has engaged with China to redirect the flow of US money back to China. In order for Biden to do that he must do something that he is unable to do – legitimately defeat President Trump at the ballot box in 2020. Ergo, if China cares to see him through, they will be required to make it happen. Theoretically, forces opposed to Xi – China’s version of their own Globalist and communist Deep State – would be the relevant entity. That this entire post hinges on a ‘false flag’ incident to “harm POTUS re: 2020” speaks entirely to my position that COVID-19 is a political construct targeting President Trump.

#3836 / 06 Feb 20
Russia & Iran allies?
Russia, Iran, & China allies?
US pol corruption China
US pol corruption Ukraine [US leverage on behalf of…]
US pol corruption Russia
US pol corruption Iran
Common denominator: China, Russia, and Iran: Closed financial systems?
Logical thinking.
Q

Note: Closed financial markets? Sound familiar? It’s the same problem that Gilead/Unitaid/Soros had as they attempted to penetrate the closed pharmaceutical markets of Brazil, India and, of course, China. THAT exact point is what started this now 20-article series. So then, who has the means, motive and access to penetrate a nation’s entirely closed financial market? Perhaps the Vice President of the United States (at that time) and the full weight of the Oval Office behind him? Joe Biden?

This brings us full circle and to the end of the Q timeline and its 56 posts related to China…. and we’re saving the best for last (not including the posts that populated as I was writing this piece.

#3896 / 23 Mar 20

“the CHINA virus”
Worth remembering:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeVrMniBjSc
Wuhan Institute of Virology [geo location]?
[1st biosafety lvl 4 lab – 2015]
City/Province origin – hot zone [geo location]?
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related
“Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at [Wuhan] University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017.”
[rapid spread]
https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-closing-of-21-million-cell-phone-accounts-in-china-may-suggest-a-high-ccp-virus-death-toll_3281291.html
>End POTUS rally(s)?
>End POTUS econ gains?
>End POTUS unemployment gains?
>End POTUS [A, B, C, D, ……]?
[weaken prior to P_elec?]
>Delay US/China trade negotiations?
[China pref Biden[+VP] as P?]
>Shelter [Biden] public appearances?
>Shelter [Biden] debate(s)?
>Push new/revised P_2020 > vote by mail? [unsecure]
https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1242071506445885441
>Push [D] ‘wish list’ [unrelated] items CV Bill [voting amends]?
https://twitter.com/SenTomCotton/status/1242169734763819011
What is the mathematical probability this occurs [the ‘time bomb’ explodes] at the exact point in time that allows for maximum damage [above] prior to the P_elec?
Outside of standard deviation?
WHO BENEFITS THE MOST?
[Mueller failed]
[Impeachment failed]
>Why was it critically important impeachment be rushed in the House?
[MSM[D party]/Hollywood narrative(s) failed]
[THE COUP FAILED]
[D] party leading nominee established [super T] prior to lock-down [take-over]? [Sanders ELIM_Biden_FRONT]
Occam’s razor simply states that of any given set of explanations for an event occurring, the simplest one is most likely the correct one.
Q

Note: “China virus”? Kind of says it all, does it not? Note the date on the article, as well – 2007 – as you recall that Obama entered office on 20 Jan 09. Here, Q has taken the time to remind us of the administration’s policy toward China at the same time direct inferences were made as to the constructive elements I’ve taken time to line-out in the catalog of articles. This last post reads like my hypothesis and the entirety of my body of work germane to COVID-19; however, the bulk of my catalog of articles precedes this post. My point is that in cryptic fashion, QAnon is outlining and confirming the same political construct I worked to identify.

In summary, it matters not whether you believe QAnon to be authentic or something other than authentic. What matters is the quality and accuracy of the relevant information that QAnon has provided consistently over time and in the case of COVID-19, I believe there is an abundance of open-source elemental evidence that can be arranged to support our hypothesis. It’s reasonable to believe that QAnon’s posts can be interpreted to demonstrate the very same theory: COVID-19 is political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17.

And as always, to our source….

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

28 Mar 20 Update: What used to be a looser conversational group has grown and, over the course of this pandemic, has become a small team of folks working together most of the day every day. Much of what I’m writing recently is a product of that collective work and/or my own opinion as influenced by that group.

Requisite disclaimer – this is now the 20th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

COVID-19, IMPEACHMENT AND THE W.H.O. BRAID TOGETHER LIKE A ROPE: Overlaying 3 timelines to demonstrate COVID-19 as a political construct shielded by the diversion of impeachment

25 Mar 20 (NINETEENTH article in a series)

Want to win a war? At a minimum, have your opponent fighting on at least two fronts. Ask the Germans about that relative to 06 Jun 44.

Before we get into it, if you are new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom otherwise you’re about ready to jump into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight.

Understand that this cartel of presidential enemies is not a cohort of dummies. They may be foolish in some of the decisions they’ve made; with many of them being explained by a probable absence of any other practical options for them, but being foolish and being dumb are different things. I, for one, am a reasonably intelligent person – rarely the smartest one in the room but able to contribute to most conversations – and I could fill a warehouse with the foolish shit I’ve done in my lifetime; and with likely plenty more opportunities ahead.

So, remember, these people are smart and they know their history. Expect them to behave accordingly. By that I am saying that if we are to assume the President’s enemies were actively framing him; and they most certainly were, then you can guarantee that in addition to transitional events – one transitioning to the other – like we’ve seen with Russia> Mueller> Ukraine> impeachment> (COVID-19?) – that we’d also see converging timelines and concurring events.

What has our attention is the degree to which impeachment and the outbreak of COVID-19 converge and concur. The premise is simply that impeachment served as the context to distract and divert EVERYONE to establish cover for COVID-19 as a political construct. Yeah, impeachment was the distraction; the diversion; and it represents only one fronts on which the President is fighting; the real front – the real plan to salvage a lost Globalist cause – being COVID-19 (hypothetically.)

In order to understand this concept, we’ll aid ourselves with a timeline that overlays the convergences and concurrences.

I chose the President’s own timeline for his active response to combat COVID-19 and reproduced in full below (SOURCE.) With this timeline as our foundation, I’m going overlay the impeachment process and announcements from the WHO.

I decided to reproduce the President’s timeline in-full because it’s demonstrative of how the regurgitated and hyperbolic MSM talking points espouse a narrative – a narrative that also just so happens to align with elemental evidence that can be arranged to depict the COVID-19 pandemic as a politically constructed event – rather than honest, substantive reporting. Again, our hypothesis asserts that this political construct was inserted into President Trump’s administration during compulsory Obama/Trump transition meetings on 13 Jan 17. That’s the same day the MSM decided to release the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story preemptively and with Flynn taking part in those meetings. Unsurprisingly, the immediate talking points from Obama administration officials and others in the know were about the disrupted, off-kilter, reluctant and awkward nature of the meeting. How convenient for them to build their future MSM talking points into the meeting by designing and timing those dynamics.

We have to give attention to some aspects that affect our lens in all of this. Our first item is rooted in the profoundly and astonishingly inadequate and incompetent performance of Nancy Pelosi in her failed and fraudulent impeachment of President Trump. Those are not exaggerations or embellishments. Even the most rudimentary scholar of civics understands that the US House of Representatives bears the sole constitutional onus to fully investigate and subsequently compile a complete case before transmitting the requisite Articles of Impeachment to the US Senate. That same scholar would also know that only the US Senate bears the sole constitutional onus of functioning as the court for the impeachment trial; understanding that investigatory aspects to any case are in no way a function of any court; rather such duties belong to law enforcement, prosecution, defense and, in this case, a designated federal body in the US House and the authority of its committees and their oversight responsibilities.

Here’s where we get subjective. Recall that Pelosi/Schiff/Nadler, et al. (Lawfare Group) ran a rigged, cooked-up and convoluted impeachment process that, for inexplicable reasons, was rushed, hurried and, counter to standing constitutional tradition, incomplete. For one, you can’t submit a complete case in the absence of an actual crime, but this is Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and Nancy Pelosi we’re dealing with here, so fundamental aspects of US law need not apply. My oringinal contention, and it’s a meritorious one, is that the weakness of the articles was intentional so as to open a portal to transfer the House’s onus over to the Senate and thus drag-out the impeachment up to and beyond the election.

But a curious thing happened. After the mad rush to impeach by Christmas was over and the vote had been taken (TIMING!), Pelosi pulled an abrupt U-turn, reversed course and refused to transmit the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for over a month. (TIMING!) That’s absurd; all the while another portal for hyper-partisan engagement was opened as the debate about Senate witnesses raged and in extra-constitutional fashion. In other words, it was a deliberate maneuver to create constitutional conflict; perhaps a very real constitutional crisis. Otherwise, why? Why did she do that? Why did she wait? There’s no ground to gain; only ground to be lost in waiting. There is no good, honest answer here. Unless….. Unles there was a motivational force unknown to us. Unless, perhaps, impeachment was not only being calibrated to an election schedule, but also to a global pandemic one.

Maybe I got it wrong when I suggested that the intentionally weak articles were devised to impede, delay, obfuscate and extend the impeachment process up-to and assuredly beyond the 2020 election; with the hope of actually removing Trump. Nope, I got that right. In-part it was absolutely devised to function that way; key words being in-part.

As we examine our timeline and overlays, we are asking ourselves if Pelosi’s curious timing and extra-constitutional approach to this bungled impeachment served in a way such that impeachment could function as a distraction, a diversion or as cover for the COVID-19 pandemic as an political construct. It’s also important to remember the role of the WHO, it’s Bill Gates/Chinese control and that it was thrust to authoritative status by the outgoing Obama administration during the 13 Jan 17 presidential transition meetings.

How much do you want to bet that the timeline strands of COVID-19, the WHO and impeachment braid together like a rope in a visibly demonstrable pattern of moves and countermoves that plausibly reflect one political construct being utilized to shield and clandestinely usher-in another more nefarious political construct?

*IMPORTANT: As you read, I’ve inserted 11 note boxes (gray) to draw your attention and give meaning to particular events.

*26 Mar 20 Revision: augmented timeline to include 14 Jan WHO declaration and new note box (3/11.)

*27 Mar 20 Revision: augmented timeline to include 28 Feb NBC overlay and assigned MSM boxes light gray.

*28 Mar 20 Revision: augmented timeline to include 11 Jan 17 comments by Fauci.

*Original Trump timeline (black/white), political (green) and COVID-19 (blue) and commentary (gray), Emphasis added.

TIMELINE / BEGIN

Note 1/11: the first report of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China is revised and backdated to appear prior to impeachment. It is imperative to understand this: 1) the impeachment process preceded COVID-19, 2) there was an inexplicable rush to push an incomplete impeachment case to the Senate before Christmas, 3) looking ahead, you’ll note that the WHO’s revision converges on the same date (28 Jan) that President Trump’s counsel rests its opening arguments (AND THE ENTIRE NATION NOW KNOWS THAT IMPEACHMENT IS A FRAUDULENT SHAM. IT WAS THIS DAY THAT THE W.H.O. DECIDED TO ANNOUNCE ITS DATA REVISION.)

*NOVEMBER 17: REVISED/BACKDATED FIRST REPORTED CASE IN WUHAN, CHINA

DECEMBER 5: HOUSE SPEAKER PELOSI AUTHORIZES DRAFTING OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

DECEMBER 10: HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN NADLER ANNOUNCES 2 ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP

DECEMBER 13: JUDICIARY COMMITTEE VOTES TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP

DECEMBER 18: HOUSE VOTES TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP

DECEMBER 25: CHRISTMAS – MAJOR HOLIDAYS ARE OFTEN UTILIZED FOR SCHEDULED EVENTS DUE TO THE GENERAL PREOCCUPATION OF MOST PEOPLE

Note 2/11: As is often the case, the announcement of the first case of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China is made in the cloud of the Christmas and New Year’s holidays; at a time when global travel is highest; and AFTER impeachment is formally in place (the vote was 18 Dec.) Timing and sequence are critical. Also notable and a little further down is that on 14 Jan, just as impeachment was being formalized, the WHO claims that human-to-human transmission is not a concern.

DECEMBER 27: COVID-19 INITIAL FIRST REPORT IN WUHAN, CHINA (SINCE REVISED BACKWARDS TO 17 NOV 19)

December 31: China reports the discovery of the coronavirus to the World Health Organization.

JANUARY 2: SENATE MAJORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER ANNOUNCES ‘DEVASTATING BLOW’ WITH NEWLY RELEASE EMAILS RELEVANT TO IMPEACHMENT

JANUARY 5: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:
Based on information provided by national authorities, WHO’s recommendations on public health measures and surveillance of influenza and severe acute respiratory infections still apply.

WHO does not recommend any specific measures for travellers. In case of symptoms suggestive of respiratory illness either during or after travel, travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their healthcare provider.

WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the current information available on this event.

January 6: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a travel notice for Wuhan, China due to the spreading coronavirus.

January 7: The CDC established a coronavirus incident management system to better share and respond to information about the virus.

JANUARY 9: PELOSI MAKES ANNOUNCEMENT STATING SHE’LL TRANSMIT ARTICLES TO SENATE SOON WHILE PINNING BLAME ON REPUBLICANS

JANUARY 10: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:
While the cause of the pneumonia seems to be a novel coronavirus, transmission potential and modes of transmission remain unclear. Therefore, it would be prudent to reduce the general risk of acute respiratory infections while travelling in or from affected areas (currently Wuhan City) by:

– avoiding close contact with people suffering from acute respiratory infections;
– frequent hand-washing, especially after direct contact with ill people or their environment;
– avoiding close contact with live or dead farm or wild animals;
– travellers with symptoms of acute respiratory infection should practice cough etiquette (maintain distance, cover coughs and sneezes with disposable tissues or clothing, and wash hands).

International traffic: no restrictions recommended

WHO does not recommend any specific health measures for travellers. It is generally considered that entry screening offers little benefit, while requiring considerable resources. In case of symptoms suggestive to respiratory illness before, during or after travel, the travellers are encouraged to seek medical attention and share travel history with their health care provider. WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the information currently available on this event.

JANUARY 10: PELOSI MAKES STATEMENT ON TRANSMITTING ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO SENATE

January 11: The CDC issued a Level I travel health notice for Wuhan, China.

Note 3/11: Just as impeachment is formalized with the announcement of impeachment managers, the WHO issues a statement communicating that it has no concerns about human-to-human transmission, which is peculiar given its robust understanding of the very nature of coronavirus strains.

JANUARY 14: WHO DECLARES NO HUMAN-TO-HUMAN TRANSMISSION CONCERNS
Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China

JANUARY 14: PELOSI ANNOUNCEMENT ON IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS AND TIMELINE

JANUARY 15: HOUSE VOTES ON IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS

JANUARY 15: PELOSI HOLDS RARE IMPEACHMENT ENGROSSMENT CEREMONY

JANUARY 15: ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FORMALLY TRANSMITTED TO SENATE

JANUARY 16: ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FORMALLY RECEIVED IN SENATE

January 17: The CDC began implementing public health entry screening at the 3 U.S. airports that received the most travelers from Wuhan – San Francisco, New York JFK, and Los Angeles.

Note 4/11: This juncture is critical. Once again and on precisely merging vectors we have President Trump’s Articles of Impeachment being formally received in the Senate; with votes on trial rules occurring the next day, converging on the same day that COVID-19 emerges in the US for the fist time.

JANUARY 20: FIRST CONFIRMED US CASE OF CORONAVIRUS IN WA STATE

January 20: Dr. Fauci announces the National Institutes of Health is already working on the development of a vaccine for the coronavirus.

January 21: The CDC activated its emergency operations center to provide ongoing support to the coronavirus response.

JANUARY 21: SENATE VOTES ON TRIAL RULES

JANUARY 22: SENATE TRIAL / PROSECUTION OPENING ARGUMENTS

January 23: The CDC sought a “special emergency authorization” from the FDA to allow states to use its newly developed coronavirus test.

Note 5/11: As the Senate trial is opening with the prosecution’s opening arguments, the WHO is still reluctant to revise its initial risk assessment, thus keeping recommendations less stringent.

JANUARY 23: WHO STATES IT’S ‘TOO EARLY’ TO DECLARE GLOBAL HEALTH EMERGENCY

JANUARY 23: SENATE TRIAL / PROSECUTION OPENING ARGUMENTS

JANUARY 24: WHO PRESS RELEASE ON CORONAVIRUS:

This is an update to the WHO advice in relation to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus nCoV, published by WHO on 10 January 2020. Since that date, travel-related cases linked to Wuhan City have been reported in several countries. For details about the current outbreak in China and the exported cases, please refer to the Diseases Outbreak News and the situation reports published by WHO.

So far, the main clinical signs and symptoms reported in this outbreak include fever, difficulty in breathing, and chest radiographs showing bilateral lung infiltrates. As of 24 January 2020, human-to-human transmission has been confirmed largely in Wuhan city, but also some other places in China and internationally. Not enough is known about the epidemiology of 2019-nCoV to draw definitive conclusions about the full clinical features of disease, the intensity of the human-to-human transmission, and the original source of the outbreak.

The current outbreak originated in Wuhan city, which is a major domestic and international transport hub. Given the large population movements, expected to significantly increase during the Chinese New Year in the last week of January, and the observed human to human transmission, it is not unexpected that new confirmed cases will continue to appear in other areas and countries.

With the information currently available for the novel coronavirus, WHO advises that measures to limit the risk of exportation or importation of the disease should be implemented, without unnecessary restrictions of international traffic.

WHO advises against the application of any restrictions of international traffic based on the information currently available on this event.

JANUARY 24: SENATE TRIAL / PROSECUTION OPENING ARGUMENTS

JANUARY 25: SENATE TRIAL / DEFENSE OPENING ARGUMENTS

JANUARY 26: SENATE TRIAL / DEFENSE OPENING ARGUMENTS

January 27: The CDC issued a level III travel health notice urging Americans to avoid all nonessential travel to China due to the coronavirus.

JANUARY 27: SENATE TRIAL / DEFENSE OPENING ARGUMENTS

JANUARY 27: WHO REVISES TRAVEL RECOMMENDATIONS

Note 6/11: As mentioned above, as the President’s counsel closes its opening arguments in authoritatively convincing fashion that the case against the President is an abvious fraudulent fabrication, the WHO curiously decides to claim an error in their data causing them to revise its COVID-19 risk assessment in more stringent fashion. It’s reasonable to assume this stance relative to our hypothesis: everyone sees the handwriting on the wall and there is no chance the impeachment will bear fruit. THIS TRIGGERS A TRANSITION (aforementioned “transitional events”) to the next step in the construct. In the case here, that next step is ensuring that COVID-19 becomes what it need to be – a global pandemic. Notice how the WHO has still yet to curb travel?

JANUARY 28: SENATE TRIAL / DEFENSE OPENING ARGUMENTS CONCLUDE

JANUARY 28: WHO CITES ERROR REVISES RISK ASSESSMENT OF COVID-19 IN PREVIOUS SITUATION REPORTS

1An error in the wording of the situation reports dated 23, 24 and 25 January was corrected on 26 January. Those reports did not correctly reflect the WHO risk assessment. The risk assessment used to inform our actions, our advice to countries, and to brief Emergency Committee members, evaluates the risk as follows: very high in China, high in the region and high globally. (The situation reports on the above dates incorrectly reported it as moderate at the global level. They have been corrected.)Data as reported by 28 January 2020*The situation report includes information reported to WHO Geneva by 10 AM

January 29: The White House announced the formation of the Coronavirus Task Force to help monitor and contain the spread of the virus and provide updates to the President. 

Note 7/11: In close proximity to the aforementioned revision in data – the revision that parallels the notion that now everyone in the free world knows the President is innocent due to the timing of his counsel’s arguments coinciding with the weekend – the WHO then further revises its position on COVID-19 and in wholesale fashion to declares it a PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. Again, it’s the timing of the Bill Gates/China controlled WHO that strikes here.

JANUARY 30: WHO ALTERS STANCE AND RECLASSIFIES COVID-19
The Director-General declared that the outbreak of 2019-nCoV constitutes a PHEIC and accepted the Committee’s advice and issued this advice as Temporary Recommendations under the IHR. 

January 31: The Trump Administration:

– Declared the coronavirus a public health emergency.

– Announced Chinese travel restrictions.

– Suspended entry into the United States for foreign nationals who pose a risk of transmitting the coronavirus.

January 31: The Department of Homeland Security took critical steps to funnel all flights from China into just 7 domestic U.S. airports.

Note 8/11: As impeachment continues to unravel and with the onus to call witnesses transferred to the Senate, the Democrats continue their obfuscation efforts by dragging the John Bolton testimony into the mix. Again, this is nothing more than another failed maneuver from start to finish.

JANUARY 31: SCHEDULED TRIAL DEBATE AND JOHN BOLTON WITNESS TESTIMONY CONSIDERATION

February 3: The CDC had a team ready to travel to China to obtain critical information on the novel coronavirus, but were in the U.S. awaiting permission to enter by the Chinese government.

February 4: President Trump vowed in his State of the Union Address to “take all necessary steps” to protect Americans from the coronavirus.

Note 9/11: This is an obvious marker as it brings impeachment to a close but more importantly, it officially galvanizes COVID-19 as the next transitional event in this ongoing treasonous and seditious coup d’etat to remove President Trump.

FEBRUARY 5: SENATE VOTES TO ACQUIT PRESIDENT TRUMP

February 6: The CDC began shipping CDC-Developed test kits for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus to U.S. and international labs.

February 9: The White House Coronavirus Task Force briefed governors from across the nation at the National Governors’ Association Meeting in Washington.

FEBRUARY 11: WHO REVISES TRAVEL RECOMMENDATIONS

February 11: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) expanded a partnership with Janssen Research & Development to “expedite the development” of a coronavirus vaccine.

February 12: The U.S. shipped test kits for the 2019 novel coronavirus to approximately 30 countries who lacked the necessary reagents and other materials.

February 12: The CDC was prepared to travel to China but had yet to receive permission from the Chinese government.

February 14: The CDC began working with five labs to conduct “community-based influenza surveillance” to study and detect the spread of coronavirus.

February 18: HHS announced it would engage with Sanofi Pasteur in an effort to quickly develop a coronavirus vaccine and to develop treatment for coronavirus infections.

February 24: The Trump Administration sent a letter to Congress requesting at least $2.5 billion to help combat the spread of the coronavirus.

February 26: President Trump discussed coronavirus containment efforts with Indian PM Modi and updated the press on his Administration’s containment efforts in the U.S. during his state visit to India.

FEBRUARY 27: Chinese Consul-General Huang Ping visited Comcast’s headquarters in New York

FEBRUARY 28: NBC LEADS-OUT ON FALSE COVID-19 “HOAX” STORY

February 29: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allowed certified labs to develop and begin testing coronavirus testing kits while reviewing pending applications.

FEBRUARY 29: WHO REVISES TRAVEL RECOMMENDATIONS

February 29: The Trump Administration:

– Announced a level 4 travel advisory to areas of Italy and South Korea.

– Barred all travel to Iran.

– Barred the entry of foreign citizens who visited Iran in the last 14 days.

March 3: The CDC lifted federal restrictions on coronavirus testing to allow any American to be tested for coronavirus, “subject to doctor’s orders.”

March 3: The White House announced President Trump donated his fourth quarter salary to fight the coronavirus.

March 4: The Trump Administration announced the purchase of approximately 500 million N95 respirators over the next 18 months to respond to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus.

March 4: Secretary Azar announced that HHS was transferring $35 million to the CDC to help state and local communities that have been impacted most by the coronavirus.

March 6: President Trump signed an $8.3 billion bill to fight the coronavirus outbreak.

The bill provides $7.76 billion to federal, state, & local agencies to combat the coronavirus and authorizes an additional $500 million in waivers for Medicare telehealth restrictions.

March 9: President Trump called on Congress to pass a payroll tax cut over coronavirus.

March 10: President Trump and VP Pence met with top health insurance companies and secured a commitment to waive co-pays for coronavirus testing.

Note 10/11: At this juncture and assuming that COVID-19 is the political construct I’ve suggested it is, it’s certainly galvanized by this date as we all found ourselves questioning the what the future holds with a global pandemic casting its shadow over us.

MARCH 11: WHO DECLARES COVID A GLOBAL PANDEMIC
WHO Director-General in his regular media briefing today stated that WHO has been assessing this outbreak around the clock and we are deeply concerned both by the alarming levels of spread and severity, and by the alarming levels of inaction. WHO thereforehave made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic.For detailed information, please see here.

Note 11/11: THE REMAINDER OF TRUMP’S TIMELINE REMAINS IF FULL. THERE ARE NO FURTHER OVERLAYS OR NOTATION BOXES, SO YOU ARE WELCOME TO SCROLL TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TIMELINE FOR CLOSING REMARKS.

March 11: President Trump:

– Announced travel restrictions on foreigners who had visited Europe in the last 14 days.

– Directed the Small Business Administration to issue low-interest loans to affected small businesses and called on congress to increase this fund by $50 billion.

– Directed the Treasury Department to defer tax payments for affected individuals & businesses, & provide $200 billion in “additional liquidity.”

– Met with American bankers at the White House to discuss coronavirus.

March 13: President Trump declared a national emergency in order to access $42 billion in existing funds to combat the coronavirus.

March 13: President Trump announced:

– Public-private partnerships to open up drive-through testing collection sites.

– A pause on interest payments on federal student loans.

– An order to the Department of Energy to purchase oil for the strategic petroleum reserve.

March 13: The Food & Drug Administration:

– Granted Roche AG an emergency approval for automated coronavirus testing kits.

– Issued an emergency approval to Thermo Fisher for a coronavirus test within 24 hours of receiving the request.

March 13: HHS announced funding for the development of two new rapid diagnostic tests, which would be able to detect coronavirus in approximately 1 hour.

March 14: The Coronavirus Relief Bill passed the House of Representatives.

March 14: The Trump Administration announced the European travel ban will extend to the UK and Ireland.

March 15: President Trump held a phone call with over two dozen grocery store executives to discuss on-going demand for food and other supplies.

March 15: HHS announced it is projected to have 1.9 million COVID-19 tests available in 2,000 labs this week.

March 15: Google announced a partnership with the Trump Administration to develop a website dedicated to coronavirus education, prevention, & local resources.

March 15: All 50 states were contacted through FEMA to coordinate “federally-supported, state-led efforts” to end coronavirus.

March 16: President Trump:

– Held a tele-conference with governors to discuss coronavirus preparedness and response.

– Participated in a call with G7 leaders who committed to increasing coordination in response to the coronavirus and restoring global economic confidence.

– Announced that the first potential vaccine for coronavirus has entered a phase one trial in a record amount of time.

– Announced “15 days to slow the spread” coronavirus guidance.

March 16: The FDA announced it was empowering states to authorize tests developed and used by labs in their states.

March 16: Asst. Secretary for Health confirmed the availability of 1 million coronavirus tests, and projected 2 million tests available the next week and 5 million the following.

March 17: President Trump announced:

– CMS will expand telehealth benefits for Medicare beneficiaries.

– Relevant Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act penalties will not be enforced.

– The Army Corps of Engineers is on ”standby” to assist federal & state governments.

March 17: President Trump spoke to fast food executives from Wendy’s, McDonald’s and Burger King to discuss drive-thru services recommended by CDC

March 17: President Trump met with tourism industry representatives along with industrial supply, retail, and wholesale representatives.

March 17: Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin met with lawmakers to discuss stimulus measures to relieve the economic burden of coronavirus on certain industries, businesses, and American workers.

March 17: Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced a partnership between USDA, Baylor University, McLane Global, and Pepsi Co. to provide one million meals per weak to rural children in response to widespread school closures.

March 17: The Treasury Department:

– Contributed $10bil through the economic stabilization fund to the Federal Reserve’s commercial paper funding facility.

– Deferred $300 billion in tax payments for 90 days without penalty, up to $1mil for individuals & $10mil for business.

March 17: The Department of Defense announced it will make available to HHS up to five million respirator masks and 2,000 ventilators.

March 18: President Trump announced:

– Temporary closure of the U.S.-Canada border to non-essential traffic.

– Plans to invoke the Defense Production Act in order to increase the number of necessary supplies needed to combat coronavirus.

– FEMA has been activated in every region at its highest level of response.

– The U.S. Navy will deploy USNS Comfort and USNS Mercy hospital ships.

– All foreclosures and evictions will be suspended for a period of time.

March 18: Secretary of Defense Mark Esper confirmed:

– 1 million masks are now immediately available.

– The Army Corps of Engineers is in NY consulting on how to best assist state officials.

March 18: HHS temporarily suspended a regulation that prevents doctors from practicing across state lines.

March 18: President Trump spoke to:

– Doctors, physicians, and nurses on the front lines containing the spread of coronavirus.

– 130 CEOs of the Business Roundtable to discuss on-going public-private partnerships in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

March 19: President Trump announced:

– Very encouraging progress shown by anti-malaria drug Hydroxychloroquine for fighting coronavirus.

– Carnival Cruise Lines will make ships available for use as hospitals in impacted areas to use for non-coronavirus patients. 

March 19:  Vice President Pence announced tens of thousands of ventilators have been identified that can be converted to treat patients.

March 19: The State Department issued a global level 4 health advisory, telling Americans to avoid all international travel due to coronavirus.

March 19: President Trump directed FEMA to take the lead on the Federal Government’s coronavirus response & visited FEMA HQ with Vice President Pence for a video call with Governors.

March 20: The U.S. and Mexico agree to mutually restrict nonessential cross-border traffic.

March 20: Secretary Mnuchin announced at the direction of President Trump that tax day will be moved from April 15 to July 15 for all taxpayers and businesses.

March 20:  President Trump:

– Spoke with Sen. Schumer about coronavirus response & stimulus measures

– Held a call with over 12,000 small business owners to discuss relief efforts

– Announced the CDC will invoke Title 42 to provide border patrol with tools to secure the borders

March 20: The Department of Education announced it will:

– Not enforce standardized testing requirements for the remainder of the school year

– Allow federal student loan borrowers to stop payments without penalty for 60 days

March 20: Secretary Azar announced:

– FEMA is coordinating and assisting coronavirus testing at labs across the country

– The CDC is suspending all illegal entries to the country based on the public health threat, via Section 362 of the Public Health & Security Act

March 20: Secretary Azar sent a letter to all 50 Governors that the federal government is buying and making available 200,000 testing swabs

March 21: Vice President Pence announced to date over 195,000 Americans tested for coronavirus and have received their results

March 21: The Trump Administration announced HHS placed an order for hundreds of millions of N95 masks through FEMA

March 21: The FDA announced it had given emergency approval to a new coronavirus test that delivers results in hours, with an intended rollout of March 30

March 21: Adm. Giroir confirmed 10 million testing kits had been put into the commercial market from March 2 through March 14

March 22: President Trump approved major disaster declarations for:

– Washington State

– California

March 22: President Trump announced: 

– Governors will remain in command of National Guard forces & the federal govt will fund 100% of operations cost

– He directed the federal govt to provide 4 large federal medical stations with 2,000 beds for CA & 1,000 beds for NY & WA.

March 22:  President Trump confirmed his administration was working with Peru & Honduras to return Americans stranded in both countries as a result of travel restrictions.

March 22: Vice President Pence announced: 

– The testing backlog will be resolved by midweek/

– To date, over 254,000 Americans have been tested for coronavirus and received their results.

March 22:  President Trump announced that the USNS Mercy will be deployed to Los Angeles.

March 22: FEMA issued guidance for tribal governments to seek federal assistance under the President’s emergency declaration.

March 23: President Trump signed an executive order invoking section 4512 of the Defense Production Act to prohibit the hoarding of vital medical supplies.

March 23: VP Pence announced:

– 313,000 Americans were tested for the coronavirus & received results.

– FEMA established a supply chain stabilization task force so Americans get supplies they need.

– HHS will have commercial labs prioritize testing for hospitalized patients.

March 23:  The White House Office of Science & Technology Policy announced a public-private consortium to:

– Advance coronavirus research.

– Provide access to computing technology and resources for researchers.

March 23: Attorney General Barr announced: 

– The Justice Department held a National Task Force meeting on hoarding and price gouging.

– Each of the 93 U.S. Attorney General offices is designating a lead prosectuor to prevent hoarding.

March 23: President Trump announced HHS is working to designate essential medical supplies as “scarce” to prohibit hoarding of these items.

March 23: The Treasury Department announced it is working with the Federal Reserve to lend up to $300 billion to businesses and local governments.

March 24: President Trump announced the Army Corps of Engineers & the National Guard are constructing four hospitals and four medical centers in New York.

March 24: President Trump approved a major disaster declaration for the state of Iowa related to the coronavirus outbreak.

March 24: Vice President Pence:

– Confirmed FEMA sent New York 2,000 ventilators.

– Announced individuals who have recently been in New York should self-quarantine for 14 days.

March 24: Dr. Deborah Birx announced the U.S. has conducted more coronavirus tests in the last week than South Korea has over the prior eight weeks.

March 24: The U.S. Army issued orders for three army hospitals to deploy their health care professionals to New York and Washington state, at the direction of Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy

TIMELINE / END

Let’s revisit our hypothesis in general form as we consider the entangled timelines above. Why did Nancy Pelosi rush impeachment only to slam on the brakes and delay the entire process by over a month? Why did she ignore her investigatory onus and, wittingly at best and intentionally at worst, transmit to the Senate Articles of Impeachment representing an incomplete case? Why did the WHO slow play precautionary measures for COVID-19? Why does the WHO’s position continue to proportionately change as the impeachment effort unravels over time? Why did the WHO revise it’s data unfavorably on the same day that the President rested his opening arguments in convincing fashion? Why did the WHO revise its initial report to situate it BEFORE the impeachment process began; not AFTER?

As it relates to all of those questions, there is only answer I can think of that satisfactorily answers all of those questions and it’s based on the notion that the impeachment of Donald J. Trump existed primarily as the diversion and cover for COVID-19 as a political construct.

Our next exercise? Let’s see if Q left anything for us. Tipping my hand – the answer is most certainly yes. Stay tuned. (That article is now right HERE.)

*28 Mar 20 Revision: It should be noted and hat tip to Shazlandia for sending the original information leading to the SOURCE, that on 11 Jan 17 Dr. Fauci made a public statement at a Georgetown University conference that may or may not be revealing due to its proximity to the 13 Jan 17 Obama/Trump transition meeting. From the article,

During a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Fauci said the Trump administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease outbreak.

HEALIO

In it the article, Fauci was quoted,

The history of the last 32 years that I have been the director of the NIAID will tell the next administration that there is no doubt they will be faced with the challenges their predecessors were faced with.

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI

Again, it’s the TIMING here as this pubic statement conveniently precedes the pandemic scenario insertion date by exactly two days.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS

Requisite disclaimer – this is now the 19th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

EMERGING ANGLE ON COVID-19: Brilliant analysis and deduction of events may speak to broader understanding, hinges on QAnon and China

24 Mar 20 (EIGHTEENTH article in a series)

Earlier today, we examined the overlap of two vectors whereby Joe Biden happens to stand front and center in both. Based upon DOJ press releases and other open-source evidence, we considered the potential for global corruption in the energy sector as a possible means by which to maneuver money relative to COVID-19 as a political construct. Here is that ARTICLE, which only goes so far as to demonstrate the overlap. While we’re at it, if you care to see the predicted timeline relevant to the present and presented by the same source for this item, see this ARTICLE. It not only tells you what to expect; but when to expect it and to the day.

Two quick things to get us going: 1) if you’re new, please see the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom (they’ll help you get-off to an efficient start in beginning to understand an abundance of information) and 2) please understand the outstanding quality of information, aptitude, intelligence and analytical ability that comes with this source. I don’t say that lightly.

For context and in short, my hypothesis asserts that COVID-19 is a political construct that was inserted into the incoming Trump administration by the outgoing Obama administration during compulsory transition meetings on 13 Jan 17; and as part of a broader Globalist agenda to remove President Trump and/or undo his historic administration; and which included actually releasing the virus strain in Wuhan, China.

There’s a considerable backdrop of entanglements, convergence, conflict and substance in the minutia of detail enmeshed in all of this and when aligned correctly, it points to criminality and corruption in historic and unprecedented proportions. This series of articles has worked to find and arrange that elemental evidence in hypothetical form; although at this point I’m about ready to drop the hypothetical disclaimer.

For the sake of this article, we’re going to back-up our perspective and park our lens at about 40,000 ft. That keeps our players simple: China and the US. Also, in doing all of this as one individual and as a hobby of personal interest, there is only so much I can do and therefore there is much that gets neglected. This article is addressing one of those areas.

Earlier today, in the course of one of our regular exchanges, the information below was dropped and I have reproduced it in full. As we consider this information from this avid global traveler, we’re working from this foundation: the timeline for the outbreak of the virus was backdated to 17 NOV 19 and the origins are attributable to Wuhan, China. The conflicting information coming out of China as coupled with the conflicting and peculiar information coming from the Bill Gates and China controlled World Health Organization, further dilutes our understanding of what is occurring there. It results in a very considerable and still largely unknown vector in all of this; especially on the political front. Moreover, I’m far from an expert on China so hearing from this particular source on this particular issue is a bit of a jackpot hit.

With all of that in place, this speaks for itself – here you go:

POTUS consistently refers to Xi as “My good friend”. Yet he constantly calls it a “Chinese Virus”. Seems like that would piss off his good friend. Reminder that Xi and POTUS had a 1 on 1 meeting in the Forbidden City. Never happened before. I looked back at q posts and found that in Jan of 2018…. (scare) necessary event…line was posted. Long time ago. Consider: Xi is faced with the same kind of deep state that we are. That Xi is colluding (in a good way) with POTUS to rid China of its bad actors. That rogue elements within China (with our bad actors help) released the virus in an effort to unseat Xi. Q has repeatedly said this was planned for years. It seems they knew in Jan 2018. The timeline fits too perfectly. I just 5 minutes ago heard POTUS in live press conference call it “A beautiful timeline”. The release would be an act of war against the entire world. It was already spreading when Chinese Yew Years was happening. Chinese allowed to travel all around the world that week. I was in Bangkok that weekend. People were already scared. I left immediately. Remember q posted in the beginning (Nov 2017) SA>US>China>EU. If that’s what happened and it’s revealed in the next few weeks it’s going to be pitchforks and torches time in China. Heads on spikes. 1 event could take out the deep state/pedos and the ChiComs at the same time. If that’s the plan it’s genius.

..add to the above. There is no doubt that China owns Biden. There is also no doubt that they would prefer Biden win the election. It’s in their best interest. Qs post yesterday mentions this.

There you have it – an entirely new angle on the internal political dynamics of China and how they present a compellingly plausible portal for it to be of benefit to President Trump in seeing his way – our way – through what is now and most likely a politically constructed global pandemic.

And you heard it here first and so, to our source…..

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS:

Requisite disclaimer – this is now the 18th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

COVID-19 UPDATE: RELIABLE SOURCE PROVIDES SIGNIFICANT QANON TIMELINE MARKERS – “DONE IN 30” – This could be accurate to the day

This information comes directly from an incredibly reliable source I’ve cited numerous times before. Let’s get right to his findings but before we do, you should know that this source was once the absolute best in his chosen profession and retired early in American dream style. That description also falls well short of the full picture. No matter, his analytical skill set is unparalleled, which is what allowed him to rise to an apex position of national prominence in his field and provide us the information below.

Here is what my source is telling me relative to the Q fabric, COVID-19 and his interpretation of cryptic messaging relative to our current timeline; using his words to the fullest extent,

POTUS just said he wanted to be open by Easter Sunday. That is April 12. National emergency was declared on March 11. ‘Done in 30”?

POTUS also said today they will be reevaluating the lock down on Monday- Tuesday. That’s March 30-31.

If we’re right it’s over by April 13th

Actually it was the 13th. Works perfectly.

So….taking this a little further. If right. Banks will close. Markets will close Friday and not reopen until April 13. Get some extra cash. Food. Beer.

I for one will welcome a return to normalcy as accompanied by a wide swath of indictments and arrests of high-value political and other targets.

And for our source…..

CONVERGING LANDSCAPES: HOW THE BIDEN FAMILY FINDS ITSELF BETWEEN ENERGY CORRUPTION AND ANTI-MALARIA VACCINATION PROGRAMS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

24 Mar 20 (SEVENTEENTH article in a series)

Let’s hope that co-opting the COVID-19 political construct and leveraging us back to reality, but in a profoundly freer state; in what may be the year of the BOOMERANG, is a part of the Trump administration’s contingency plan to remedy this tragedy in which we currently find ourselves. Until such time, our priority must be working to fully understand our present landscape as accurately and thoroughly as we can. In such an endeavor, my efforts late last night had me filtering through endless DOJ PRESS RELEASES hunting for evidence of corruption and financial transactions germane to COVID-19 pandemic as a possible political construct. You won’t believe what I found because it’s deeper and more entangled than anticipated; and it wraps back to my prior work on an entirely different vector; and it has the Biden’s and China standing squarely in the middle of ALL OF IT. We’re going to examine the overlap of these two vectors and why the Bidens are connected to both.

All of that is going to take some housekeeping in order to properly line it out for you.

To begin, if you’re just now coming into this (haven’t read the body of work up to this point), you’re jumping into the ocean with no shoreline in sight. You need a backdrop of context to understand the enormity of all of this. You’ll find the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom helpful.

First, this article is different. I’m writing this to ask the professionals to just consider what I’ve outlined in what is now a catalog of 17 unintended articles, and determine if there is a grain of veracity to any of it. Unleash the resources and help to rule in or out what appears to be an abundance of open-source evidence that paints a nefarious picture.

Here’s the first housekeeping item – familiarizing yourself with the Biden’s connection to Ukraine, which I researched at length and discussed in the context of cryptic messaging from QAnon. Yes, I give much time to QAnon and for this simple reason – no matter if you believe QAnon to be absolutely real or absolutely fake, QAnon has consistently remained in front of the news cycle; with great accuracy, over time and while the MSM and other “news” outlets have consistently gotten it wrong for that same time. Yes, you have to dig to get the information but the doormats are conveniently placed in front of you if you care to enter. I care to enter.

Therefore, if you care to examine my findings on Biden and the Ukraine HERE, it’s within the QAnon dialogue. What those findings establish is one entire vector to the overlap that we are examining today and namely, the effort of the Biden family, while Joe was then Vice President, to use the existing corruption enmeshed in Ukraine to execute a corruption scheme in the global energy markets; primarily in natural gas. That’s nothing new and it’s been all over the press. It’s also not the full story.

So, on one side of the Bidens we have the Ukraine and a vast amount of global corruption in the energy markets. Precisely here, unless you know where I’m going with this, we have a gap. This gap I will fill-in for you below but for now, what is on the other side of the Bidens is represented by a cohort and the connection or nexus to it is our gap. Here’s that cohort: George Soros, Open Society Foundations, Unitaid, Gilead Sciences, Bill Gates, Pinbright, the World Health Organization and China. If you don’t have a full understanding of the details as to why this list represents a cohort, please refer to the HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS at the bottom.

So then, let’s fill in the gap (or the nexus) that ties global corruption in the energy markets using Ukraine as the conduit to a global viral pandemic with COVID-19; and with the Biden in the middle.

We’ll begin with THIS article from yesterday and what was outlined therein, which was THEN LATER CONFIRMED (to a large extent) by a subsequent QAnon post in #3896. From there, the DOJ search commenced using several search parameters. Consider this significant press release from 25 Mar 19, which deserves to be presented in full and with EMPHASIS ADDED:

Former Head of Organization Backed by Chinese Energy Conglomerate Sentenced to Three Years in Prison for International Bribery and Money Laundering Offenses

Schemed to Bribe the President of Chad and the President and Foreign Minister of Uganda

Chi Ping Patrick Ho, aka “Patrick C.P. Ho” and “He Zhiping,” was sentenced today to serve 36 months in prison for his role in a multi-year, multimillion-dollar scheme to bribe top officials of Chad and Uganda in exchange for business advantages for CEFC China Energy Company Limited (“CEFC China”) Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman for the Southern District of New York announced.  Ho was convicted of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), money laundering, and conspiracy to commit the same, in December 2018, after a one-week jury trial before U.S. District Judge Loretta A. Preska, who imposed today’s sentence.

In addition to his prison term, Ho, 69, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China who resided in Hong Kong prior to his arrest in November 2017 and has been detained since his arrest, was fined $400,000.  Following his prison sentence, Ho will be removed from the United States.

“Patrick Ho bribed officials at the highest levels of government in Chad and Uganda in pursuit of lucrative oil deals and other business opportunities, all while using a U.S.-based NGO to conceal his criminal scheme,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski.  “This kind of corruption undermines world markets and tilts the playing field against law-abiding companies and individuals.  The Department will continue to investigate and prosecute individuals and corporations that engage in foreign bribery. ”

“Patrick Ho schemed to bribe the leaders of Chad and Uganda in order to secure unfair business advantages for the Chinese energy company he served,” said Manhattan U.S. Attorney Berman.  “His actions were brazen, including offering the president of Chad $2 million in cash, hidden in gift boxes.  Foreign corruption undermines the fairness of international markets, erodes the public’s faith in its leaders, and is deeply unfair to the people and businesses that play by the rules.  Today’s sentence recognizes the severe harm caused by Ho’s actions.”

According to the evidence presented at trial, Ho orchestrated and executed two bribery schemes to pay top officials of Chad and Uganda in exchange for business advantages for CEFC China, a Shanghai-based multibillion-dollar conglomerate that operates internationally in multiple sectors, including oil, gas, and banking.  During the course of the schemes, Ho served as the secretary-general of a non-governmental organization based in Hong Kong and Arlington, Virginia, and registered as a charitable entity in the United States, the China Energy Fund Committee (“CEFC NGO”), which held “Special Consultative Status” with the United Nations (UN) Economic and Social Council.  CEFC NGO was funded by CEFC China.

In the first scheme (the Chad Scheme), Ho, on behalf of CEFC China, offered a $2 million cash bribe, hidden within gift boxes, to Idriss Déby, the president of Chad, in an effort to obtain valuable oil rights from the Chadian government.  In the second scheme (the Uganda Scheme), Ho caused a $500,000 bribe to be paid, via wires transmitted through New York, New York, to an account designated by Sam Kutesa, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Uganda, who had recently completed his term as the president of the UN General Assembly.  Ho also schemed to pay a $500,000 cash bribe to Yoweri Museveni, the president of Uganda, and offered to provide both Kutesa and Museveni with additional corrupt benefits by “partnering” with them and their families in future joint ventures in Uganda.

The Chad Scheme

The Chad Scheme began in or about September 2014 when Ho flew into New York to attend the annual UN General Assembly.  At that time, CEFC China – a multibillion-dollar energy company based in Shanghai, China – was working to expand its operations to Chad, and wanted to meet with President Déby as quickly as possible.  Through a connection, Ho was introduced to Cheikh Gadio, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Senegal, who had a personal relationship with President Déby.  Ho and Gadio met at CEFC China’s suite at Trump World Tower in midtown Manhattan, where Ho enlisted Gadio to assist CEFC China in obtaining access to President Déby

Gadio connected Ho and CEFC China to President Déby.  In an initial meeting in Chad in November 2014, President Déby described to Ho and CEFC China executives certain lucrative oil rights that were available for CEFC China to acquire.  Following that meeting, Gadio advised Ho and CEFC China to send a technical team to Chad to investigate the oil rights and make an offer to President Déby grounded in factual data.  Instead, Ho insisted on a prompt second meeting with President Déby.  The second meeting took place a few weeks later, in December 2014Ho led a CEFC China delegation, which flew to Chad on a corporate jet with $2 million cash concealed within several gift boxes.  At the conclusion of a business meeting with President Déby, Ho and the CEFC China executives presented him with the gift boxes. 

To the surprise of Ho and the CEFC China executives, President Déby rejected the $2 million bribe offer, but later agreed to accept the money as a charitable donation to the country.  Ho subsequently drafted a letter to President Déby falsely claiming that the cash had really been intended as a donation to the people of Chad all along.

Ho and CEFC China did not obtain the unfair advantage that they had sought through the bribe offer, and by mid-2015, Ho had turned his attention to a different so-called “gateway to Africa”:  Uganda.

The Uganda Scheme

The Uganda Scheme began around the same time as the Chad Scheme, when Ho was in New York for the annual UN General Assembly.  Ho met with Sam Kutesa, who had recently begun his term as the 69th president of the UN General Assembly (“PGA”).  Ho, purporting to act on behalf of CEFC NGO, met with Kutesa and began to cultivate a relationship with him.  During the year when Kutesa served as PGA, Ho and Kutesa discussed a “strategic partnership” between Uganda and CEFC China for various business ventures, to be formed once Kutesa returned to Uganda.

In or about February 2016 – after Kutesa had returned to Uganda and resumed his role as Foreign Minister, and Yoweri Museveni (Kutesa’s relative) had been reelected as the president of Uganda – Kutesa solicited a payment from Ho, purportedly for a charitable foundation that Kutesa wished to launch.  Ho agreed to provide the requested payment, but simultaneously requested, on behalf of CEFC China, an invitation to Museveni’s inauguration, business meetings with Museveni and other high-level Ugandan officials, and a list of specific business projects in Uganda in which CEFC China could participate.

In May 2016, Ho and CEFC China executives traveled to Uganda.  Prior to departing, Ho caused CEFC NGO to wire $500,000 to the account provided by Kutesa in the name of the so-called “foundation,” which wire was transmitted through New York, New York.  Ho also advised his boss, Ye Jianming, the then-chairman of CEFC China, to provide $500,000 in cash to Museveni, ostensibly as a campaign donation, even though Museveni had already been reelected.  Ho intended these payments to influence Kutesa and Museveni to use their official power to steer business advantages to CEFC China.

Ho and CEFC China executives attended President Museveni’s inauguration and obtained business meetings in Uganda with Museveni and top Ugandan officials, including with the Department of Energy and Mineral Resources.  After the trip, Ho requested that Kutesa and Museveni assist CEFC China in acquiring a Ugandan bank, as an initial step before pursuing additional ventures in Uganda.  Ho also offered to “partner” with Kutesa and Museveni and/or their “family businesses,” making clear that both officials would share in CEFC China’s future profits.  In exchange for the bribes offered and paid by Ho, Kutesa thereafter steered a bank acquisition opportunity to CEFC China.

The investigation was conducted by the FBI and IRS Criminal Investigation.  U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations and the Department of Justice, Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs provided assistance.

Trial Attorney Paul A. Hayden of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section, FCPA Unit and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel C. Richenthal, Douglas S. Zolkind, and Catherine E. Ghosh of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Southern District of New York’s Public Corruption Unit are prosecuting the case.

The Fraud Section is responsible for investigating and prosecuting all FCPA matters.  Additional information about the Justice Department’s FCPA enforcement efforts can be found at www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa.

DOJ PRESS RELEASE

It’s the CEFC/Chad/Uganda entanglements that have our attention. Before we get into it, Chad/Uganda are the only connections I’ve uncovered thus far and its a virtual certainty that more exist. For the time being, though, here’s why Chad and Uganda are relevant in all of this.

What happens if you go to Unitaid’s website and search for Chad?

You get THIS, which demonstrates a convergence on the same relative timeline as CEFC energy ventures into Chad. Look at the focus, EMPHASIS ADDED.

Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention now underway in Burkina Faso, Chad, Nigeria

News | 21 September 2017
A third season of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention (SMC) is now underway in Burkina Faso, Chad and Nigeria through the Unitaid-funded ACCESS-SMC project implemented by Malaria Consortium. A Unitaid delegation arrived in Burkina Faso today to monitor the project there. Most childhood deaths from malaria in the region occur during the rainy season. SMC treatment during this period has proven to prevent illness and death from malaria.

The success of a Unitaid malaria-prevention pilot is informing and inspiring similar work

News | 25 April 2018
On this year’s World Malaria Day, Unitaid is pleased to see its work to stop early-childhood malaria in Africa’s Sahel region being carried on by governments and other organizations, offering the potential to one day protect all the region’s smallest children from the deadly disease. From 2014 to 2017, Unitaid funded the ACCESS-SMC project, the world´s very first large-scale pilot to evaluate the effectiveness of seasonal malaria.

World Malaria Day 2015

News | 25 April 2015
Giving More Children Protection Against Malaria. As the world marks malaria day with a call to ”invest in the future, defeat malaria,” we can celebrate that the global malaria map is steadily shrinking as millions more are reached with measures to prevent, diagnose and treat the mosquito-borne disease. Yet despite a nearly 50 percent fall in mortality since 2000, malaria still claims more than half a million lives globally every year, most of…

Note the following from the extracts above: anti-malaria research with special emphasis on chemoprevention and preventing childhood infection (COVID-19 only really impacts seniors and holds harmless younger demographics.)

Why is the anti-malarial angle important? It’s anti-malaria treatments that currently pave the best path to remedying COVID-19.

What happens if you search Unitaid for Uganda? You get THIS and it’s a copious amount of results showing much the same. Consider these several examples (EMPHASIS MINE).

Treating severe malaria in Uganda

News | 22 April 2016
Two-year-old Kamaragi was reeling with high fever when he was brought to the Luweero Hospital in northern Uganda. Not surprisingly, he tested positive for severe malaria, which often affects children in Africa. Fortunately for Kamaragi, he was given injectable artesunate, a new malaria treatment that can bring people, especially children, back from the brink of death. By the second day, Kamaragi was much better and the fever was gone, buying…view more

South Africa to introduce state-of-the-art HIV treatment

News | 27 November 2019
The country has the largest national HIV programme in the world Unitaid has played a key role in ushering in the new and improved treatment, which works toward ending the HIV epidemic Johannesburg, South Africa – One in five people in the world on HIV medication will be able to switch to a simpler, more affordable, more effective treatment following an announcement today that the Government of South Africa will roll out a state-of-the-art…view more

New Unitaid grants help protect women and children from malaria

News | 25 April 2017
Geneva – Unitaid’s Executive Board has approved three new malaria grants totalling over US $72 million on the occasion of World Malaria Day. The grants will help to prevent malaria deaths among pregnant women and children under six years of age, both considered high-risk groups for the disease. Unitaid funds interventions that have a catalytic effect, preparing the way for other partners to adopt and scale up innovative health products or…

Unitaid-funded programme will bring sophisticated TB diagnosis to underserved children

News | 06 December 2017
Geneva – Unitaid and the University of Bordeaux today launched a four-year research project to cut TB deaths among children by widening availability of fast tests that can be used even in remote, rural settings. The TB-Speed project will be implemented in Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, Uganda and Zambia by a consortium of eight organizations led by the University of Bordeaux and supported by a US$ 14.6…

New Unitaid and CHAI initiative to speed introduction and access to critical HIV drugs

News | 30 November 2016
Unitaid – CHAI grant aims to drive savings of $1.6 billion through 2024. Unitaid and the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) today announced a three-year project to speed the introduction of new, optimal HIV drugs, and make them more available and affordable. The US $ 34 million investment is expected to be a boon for adults and children living with HIV who receive treatments that are not effective. In addition, 18 million people who…

Note the following from the extracts above: the same anti-malaria research as well as a nexus to the Clinton Foundation (no political conspiracy theory is complete without them.) Moreover, the HIV work, which aligns with the insertions found in the COVID-19 strain as previously covered.

This brings us full circle and we stay on the concept of nexuses as we fill in the one remaining piece of information in our gap. How do the Bidens factor into all of this.

Here’s how. Remember the Chinese energy company complicit in this all – CEFC? Well, consider this as sourced HERE (EMPHASIS MINE),

A high-ranking Chinese businessman was charged by the Justice Department with global corruption and bribery in 2017, and the first call he made after his arrest was to Vice President Joe Biden’s brother, James Biden, who thinks the call was meant for Joe’s son, Hunter.

Patrick Ho, the lieutenant to the founder of the multibillion-dollar Chinese conglomerate CEFC China Energy, was indicted under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the Southern District of New York for his role in a global money laundering and bribery scheme aimed at government officials in Africa. The Justice Department also accused Ho of helping with Iranian sanctions evasion and working to use the Chinese company’s connections to sell weaponry to Chad, Libya, and Qatar.

Ho immediately tried reaching out to the younger Biden for help because that summer, as investigators circled, Hunter agreed to represent Ho as part of Hunter’s efforts to work out a liquefied natural gas deal worth tens of millions of dollars with CEFC China Energy’s leader Ye Jianming.

So, we know the Biden’s have a direct interface with CEFC. But what about the other side? The side opposite of the converging vast amounts of corruption in the global energy sector. Here’s one way to bridge that gap on the same timeline as sourced from Unitaid HERE. In it and from these extracts, we learn (EMPHASIS MINE),

Geneva – Unitaid’s Executive Board has approved three new malaria grants totalling over US $72 million on the occasion of World Malaria Day. The grants will help to prevent malaria deaths among pregnant women and children under six years of age, both considered high-risk groups for the disease.

Unitaid funds interventions that have a catalytic effect, preparing the way for other partners to adopt and scale up innovative health products or approaches.

Unitaid is investing US $50 million to ensure that pregnant women in malaria-affected countries in sub-Saharan Africa have access to a preventive therapy for malaria known as “intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy” or IPTp. The five-year project, to be implemented by Jhpiego, an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, will increase IPTp coverage and expand antenatal care attendance in four African countries – Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, Mozambique and Nigeria.

In areas with high malaria transmission, young children and pregnant women are especially vulnerable to malaria infection and death. In 2015, more than two-thirds of all malaria deaths occurred among children under the age of five. Malaria killed an estimated 429,000 people in 2015 , according to the World Health Organization, despite being  preventable and treatable.

The three-year project, implemented by the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), will provide pre-referral treatment for more than 5000 cases of severe malaria per year in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria and Uganda. If the pre-referral treatment is scaled up, Unitaid estimates that RAS could benefit up to a million children and save up to 20,000 lives per year.

The Board also approved a US $3.4 million supply grant with Medicines for Malaria Venture to increase the availability of new, effective, affordable, user-friendly and quality-assured products for malaria pre-referral treatment with RAS, as well as medicines used for Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in children and preventive therapy in pregnant women.

UNITAID

Recall, it was Gates, who funds and steers the WHO; along with China as the other primary donor, and here we see Soros and his NGO ventures coalesce with Gates in the same anti-malaria, African nation, patent-sharing, vaccine and treatment research. Recall, it was John Hopkins that conducted a viral pandemic drill along with Bill Gates and the WHO in a precursory exercise antecedent to the outbreak of COVID-19. Recall that it was the WHO that was thrust into preeminent leadership in global viral pandemic scenario that was presented during the 13 Jan 17 Obama/Trump transition meetings. Recall that Joe Biden was the Vice President at that time.

So then, I ask you. What are the chances that the Obama administration, the Bidens and the Clintons were using corruption in the global energy markets (and assuredly elsewhere) as a mechanism to research and develop antimalarial treatments and vaccines relative to COVID-19? I don’t know. I do know that I’m reluctant to once again look the other way in the face of yet another possible example of profound corruption and apparently of the highest order.

The type of order that would have you confined inside your home to avoid a contagion that may have been bio-engineered and released for political purposes.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS:

Requisite disclaimer – this is now the 17th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remdesivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

A PRAGMATIC AND GRANULAR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW AND WHY COVID-19 FUNCTIONS AS A POLITICAL CONSTRUCT – Examining how the enemy operates by comparing COVID-19 to failed impeachment

23 Mar 20 (SIXTEENTH article in a series)

Here’s the downside to using a global viral pandemic as cover for a nefarious Globalist agenda – viral pandemics are natural occurrences that have and will continue to manifest over the course of human history. I suppose that it’s akin to something like blaming an earthquake on someone. Those, too, have and will continue to happen over time as natural events. That poses a problem for these people and it leads to our key word: transfer (of authority). It’s redundant throughout because it’s the fulcrum point in both COVID-19 and the failed impeachment as political constructs.

What we’re really focusing on here today (and in all of this, really) is the subtlety and nuance in politics whereby one entity is leveraging legal mechanisms applicable to designated targets so as to trigger those mechanisms and cause certain, predetermined outcomes to manifest. Subsequently, the target is exposed to the dynamics of the predetermined outcome/s. When the target interfaces with those dynamics as coupled with the target’s response, the details of those events are normally used to set, adjust or alter the narrative in predetermined, chosen ways. The public’s interface with this is through the MSM – that’s the delivery point for the end product, which is essentially manufactured and shaped propaganda (see SMITH-MUNDT MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2012.)

That’s what a construct is and it’s nothing new. It’s an archaic strategy. In both cases – the COVID-19 construct (our hypothesis) and the Democrats’ failed impeachment effort – the political constructs were designed to cause a TRANSFER of authority, but in different ways; for different reasons and with entirely different outcomes, other than furthering the treasonous and seditious effort against this duly elected president. In the case of the COVID-19, the transfer functions to usurp emergency powers granted to the President of the United States while also establishing a landscape of controversy to be used to further extend the unrelenting attack on him. In the case of impeachment, the transfer functioned to impede and obfuscate that same President’s right to timely due process as a function of the broader effort to undermine and attack him and his administration as much as it worked for campaign, political and self-preservation purposes. It’s all different, but it’s all the same and it’s all rooted in transferring authority to hi-jack authority or impede it.

The global pandemic is a clever choice for the context of a political construct and for many significant reasons (look around you right now); especially the fluidity and adaptability aspects of it. As a construct, this pandemic functions in a very real and deliberate capacity so as to compel a US president to defer to “experts” as predicated on the concept that “virology,” “epidemiology,” and “pandemic response” are relatively beyond the reasonable scope of the President’s “expertise.” In this case, there are aspects of the President’s authority under emergency declarations that are essentially being transferred to others; in-part or in-full; and due to their relative expertise superseding his. This represents the nuanced, subtle strategy of real politics where a transfer of authority is the crucial mechanism. If you own those who are receiving aspects of the President’s authority, you now own that authority (read the last article to understand why that should worry the hell out of you and as you do, recall that the last major false flag event [9/11] you’ll recall that it, too, occurred under a Republican administration and for good reason.)

Think back to the failed impeachment. It was much the same in the sense that the President’s enemies maneuvered to shift to the Senate the House’s investigatory onus and its duty to present a complete case. By doing so, it opened an extra-constitutional; if not unconstitutional, vector to facilitate hyper-partisan politics and thus deliberately muck up the entire process; possibly grinding it to an excruciatingly slow pace and all of the way up to and past the election (see THIS for deeper understanding). But what is the fundamental aspect (the mechanism) of it all? It’s the mechanism of transfer. With impeachment, the House intentionally sent weak articles to the Senate to force an extra-constitutional transfer of the House’s authority and investigatory onus to the Senate. Technically, that was the strategy (to drag it through the election…. and then he beat it all. On to the next strategy? You better believe it.)

This hypothetical COVID-19 political construct we are exploring is no different as it too has a transfer mechanism embedded in it. Just like the House>Senate transfer opened a vector for engagement in hyper-partisan politics as it delayed and prevented due process, the Trump>Fauci/Birx transfer opened a legal portal whereby aspect of the President’s legal oversight and response authority can be justifiably transferred to others; namely Fauci and Birx. It’s Fauci and Birx who are leading-out on the oversight of pandemic response and they are doing so as partnered-up with Bill Gates and China; both funding and steering the World Health Organization. This was all as established in the Obama/Trump transition meeting on 13 Jan 17 during administrative transition meetings.

So, it’s the transfer mechanism aspect is most important. This is politics. The playing field is regulated by the broad, vast and deep body of law surrounding it and within it; and the minutia of details therein. It’s how those details are leveraged and exploited for gain that represent the finer points of playing hardball in DC. Constructing ways to trigger such a transfer of authority like we are seeing right now is a perfect example.

Understand that all of this – from the transition meeting to the President’s compulsory deference to experts – is a function of law. The President has no choice here – morally, ethically and legally he is bound to play by the rules and by that, the law; and thankfully so (see Obama administration for an analog of the opposite.) So, in this case, Trump takes his backseat as he is bound to do and he adjusts course to shape the landscape through the alternative vectors that he can control. This dynamic explains why you see Fauci and Birx kind of, sort of playing nice with a testy Trump but with real, noticeable and palpable tension between all the players as I demonstrated with video in this ARTICLE.

Although the fluidity and adaptability of a viral pandemic allows bad actors with nefarious intentions to have the capacity to essentially act with impunity while ushering-in myriad draconian response measures and justifying and rationalizing them to an accepting American people eager to find any form of relief, it’s awfully difficult to blame a virus on a President. So then, how do you package it and make it palatable for the American people and such that they understand that it is 100% the fault of “orange man bad?”

Here’s how. In order to hang someone with the viral pandemic rope, there has to be a constructive element to it and for the reason of establishing pretext. If you have read my stuff, you know that establishing pretext is both a) something I talk about regularly and b) a function of politicians and the MSM. Identifying pretext accurately is a useful strategy in finding truth and meaning because in order to do that, any construct would have to come full circle and back to pretext to close the loop fully. Understand that the primary purpose of pretext is establishing the foundation for future criticism. In this case and through one lens, it’s to insert the basis for, “We told you about this and you chose not to listen!”

Look no further that what we are seeing today in the MSM – all of the criticism is rooted in failure to prepare, failure to heed warning, failure to craft an effective response plan, failure to meet needs, failure to act in a timely manner, failure to act appropriately before the outbreak, etc. In order to attack the President on this issue, his enemies are forced to narrow their scope tightly. They will be prevented from baseless attacks because as they predetermined, epidemiology, virology and pandemic response are not within the scope of his area of expertise. That’s right. Sometimes the political details that are leveraged have two sharply honed edges and one of them cuts oppositely back against the grain. This dynamic will drive how they are required to attack the President.

So, here’s what you can do, though. You can force him to stand down to your own people. Sound familiar? See Birx and Fauci (and see the last several articles.)

The President’s scope of responsibility pertaining to his legal authority, his policy decisions and his moral and ethical obligations are the only vectors through which his opponents can criticize him on this matter. Consequently, his opponents and enemies are relegated to attacking these policy decisions and actions; but not him alone aside from the normal insanity we regularly hear anyway. And I’m not saying they won’t try, but that it won’t be effective if they do.

To effectively persuade the American people that the broader COVID-19 matter is somehow the President’s fault, understand that prima facie baseless attacks will be highly ineffective outside of only the most ardent, irrational Kool-Aid drinkers on the Left. Poll numbers and event crowd sizes for POTUS rallies relative to Democratic campaign events suggest that the President’s enemies are forced to attack him only in specific ways otherwise those efforts will bear no fruit and they know it.

Therefore, they MUST attack the specific areas of his policy, legal, moral and ethical responsibility germane to the dynamics this pandemic presents. That precise political force (and reality) shapes the form of that criticism takes in the MSM. That’s an important indicator supportive of the construct hypothesis – how the source narrative aligns with the MSM narrative. And what do you know? The current MSM criticism EXACTLY MIRRORS the 13 Jan 17 transition pretext that Obama and his Globalist masters inserted into President Trump’s then incoming administration. It’s exactly what we’ve been seeing in the MSM all along; almost by design, if not by design….. it’s by design.

In order to set this construct in place, some form of pandemic seed (PRETEXT!) must have been sown into the Trump administration and early on. Referring to the last several ARTICLES, through one hypothesis I’ve demonstrated unequivocally that seed was sown on 13 Jan 17 during the Obama/Trump transition meeting and converging with the MSM’s revelations of the cooked-up Flynn/Russia allegations; and with Flynn taking part in said transition meeting. As they do with everything else, they hid the construct among all of the other topics and scenarios that were presented in the transition meeting that day. It’s not like a viral pandemic was the only topic; far from it.

The messaging from Obama officials was virtually instant. The criticism began almost immediately you can see from the press at that time and as you’ll not in MSM coverage today.

Before we go, recall what the Left was doing as COVID-19 was unfolding in real time: standing down and pushing impeachment. For one, the Bill Gates and China controlled WHO was downplaying the entirety of it all as were the usually suspect Democrats. At that time, early on, when the President did take appropriate action, said remedies were used as openings for cheap shots using company lines like “racist!” Why?

What about impeachment. It sure seems to me that impeachment was a distraction from a grander scheme unfolding in parallel fashion. As the WHO was downplaying the emergence of the virus, American politicians, with an ulterior agenda and a nasty “orange man bad” disposition, vitriolically peddled a fraudulent impeachment narrative with the effect of grinding the federal apparatus to a halt. Why? Like I said. It sure seems that impeachment may have been cover for a grander scheme.

Consider everything I’ve outlined in the previous 15 articles and here in this piece and then ask yourself this – How in the world did we end-up in a scenario where the planet is on lock-down, an historic Republican presidency (economy, populist approach, etc.) evaporated overnight and by means of a compulsory meeting on 13 Jan 17, the President is riding shotgun to two Globalists – one a long-timer circa Reagan and the other a long-tenured, Obama-appointed DSSG/MIC’er – running point on a global pandemic as none of us can leave our homes, go to work, go to school, visit our grandparents; and on the eve of one of the most historic and significant elections ever?

And how is this mind-blowing convergence of globally destructive events – all favorable to the broader agenda of the Globalists and them being deeply and widely enmeshed and entangled in all of it – not a POLITICAL CONSTRUCT?

Or, it all happened by chance. In hypothetical summary – we are currently being ushered-into a ‘new normal’ in what appears to be the next 9/11; but on a global scale.

Let’s hope co-opting this construct and leveraging us back to reality but in a profoundly freer state; in what may be the year of the BOOMERANG, is a part of the Trump administration’s contingency plan to remedy this tragedy in which we currently find ourselves.

For another independent lens with a similar perspective, see THIS American Thinker item as recommended by Shazlandia.

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS:

Requisite disclaimer – this is now the 16th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

INCREDIBLE EVIDENCE CORRELATING COVID-19 WITH POLITICAL CONSTRUCT: Dirty Harvard Professor, Spies and Wuhan, China

23 Mar 20 (FIFTEENTH article in a series)

Since evidence suggests that we are sitting plumb in the middle of the next 9/11, which is ushering-in the latest version of the ‘new normal,’ let’s just get right to it.

To begin, if this is your first read from me on this topic, please start with the ‘HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS’ at the bottom, otherwise you’re jumping into the middle of the ocean with no shoreline in sight. In the search for more evidence in support of my hypothesis (see work linked below which includes 14 previous articles and two more I can’t seem to finish), I often look backwards. In that light, I revisited a DOJ press release from 28 Jan 20 that was also linked by QAnon.

For context and in short, my hypothesis asserts that COVID-19 is a political construct that was inserted into the incoming Trump administration by the outgoing Obama administration during compulsory transition meetings on 13 Jan 17; and as part of a broader Globalist agenda to remove President Trump and/or undo his historic administration; and which included actually releasing the virus strain in Wuhan, China.

Let’s revisit some important dates:

First – the COVID-19 outbreak is currently linked back to 17 Nov 19. It is important to note is that this is a revised date backed-up from initial reports: SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE

Second – the first reported US case of COVID-19 was 19 Jan 20: SOURCE

Third and most importantly – the initial reporting on the first case in China, from which the current timeline was revised backwards, is 27 Dec 19. The sourced information below demonstrates the revised timeline that is critical in terms of understanding how the historical epidemiology is possibly being changed to potentially align with the timeline of a political construct. Consider this information sourced HERE,

In a report by Zhu and colleagues, investigators with the China CDC describe three adults who were admitted to a hospital in Wuhan on December 27, 2019; the two patients for whom clinical information was available had pneumonia. One of the patients died and the other two recovered. 2019-nCoV was detected in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens by whole-genome sequencing, direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and culture. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the virus falls into the betacoronavirus genus, which besides SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV also includes a bat SARS-like coronavirus.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

With what is outlined above, we’ll throw-out the revised timeline marker date and use the remaining two as bookends to our argument: 27 Dec 19 (first report of COVID-19 in China) and 19 Jan 20 (first report of COVID-19 n US.)

Now, let’s consider the 28 Jan 20 DOJ press release, which I have reproduced in full and with EMPHASIS ADDED (SOURCE).

Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases

The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China.  

Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was arrested this morning and charged by criminal complaint with one count of making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement.  Lieber will appear this afternoon before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler in federal court in Boston, Massachusetts.

Yanqing Ye, 29, a Chinese national, was charged in an indictment today with one count each of visa fraud, making false statements, acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy. Ye is currently in China. 

Zaosong Zheng, 30, a Chinese national, was arrested on Dec. 10, 2019, at Boston’s Logan International Airport and charged by criminal complaint with attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China.  On Jan. 21, 2020, Zheng was indicted on one count of smuggling goods from the United States and one count of making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements.  He has been detained since Dec. 30, 2019.

Dr. Charles Lieber

According to court documents, since 2008, Dr. Lieber who has served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialized in the area of nanoscience, has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD).  These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities. Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017.  China’s Thousand Talents Plan is one of the most prominent Chinese Talent recruit plans that are designed to attract, recruit, and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security.  These talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information.  Under the terms of Lieber’s three-year Thousand Talents contract, WUT paid Lieber $50,000 USD per month, living expenses of up to 1,000,000 Chinese Yuan (approximately $158,000 USD at the time) and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT.  In return, Lieber was obligated to work for WUT “not less than nine months a year” by “declaring international cooperation projects, cultivating young teachers and Ph.D. students, organizing international conference[s], applying for patents and publishing articles in the name of” WUT.

The complaint alleges that in 2018 and 2019, Lieber lied about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Plan and affiliation with WUT.  On or about, April 24, 2018, during an interview with investigators, Lieber stated that he was never asked to participate in the Thousand Talents Program, but he “wasn’t sure” how China categorized him.  In November 2018, NIH inquired of Harvard whether Lieber had failed to disclose his then-suspected relationship with WUT and China’s Thousand Talents Plan.  Lieber caused Harvard to falsely tell NIH that Lieber “had no formal association with WUT” after 2012, that “WUT continued to falsely exaggerate” his involvement with WUT in subsequent years, and that Lieber “is not and has never been a participant in” China’s Thousand Talents Plan. 

Yanqing Ye

According to the indictment, Ye is a Lieutenant of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the armed forces of the People’s Republic of China and member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  On her J-1 visa application, Ye falsely identified herself as a “student” and lied about her ongoing military service at the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), a top military academy directed by the CCP.  It is further alleged that while studying at Boston University’s (BU) Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering from October 2017 to April 2019, Ye continued to work as a PLA Lieutenant completing numerous assignments from PLA officers such as conducting research, assessing U.S. military websites and sending U.S. documents and information to China.

According to court documents, on April 20, 2019, federal officers interviewed Ye at Boston’s Logan International Airport. During the interview, it is alleged that Ye falsely claimed that she had minimal contact with two NUDT professors who were high-ranking PLA officers.  However, a search of Ye’s electronic devices demonstrated that at the direction of one NUDT professor, who was a PLA Colonel, Ye had accessed U.S. military websites, researched U.S. military projects and compiled information for the PLA on two U.S. scientists with expertise in robotics and computer science.  Furthermore, a review of a WeChat conversation revealed that Ye and the other PLA official from NUDT were collaborating on a research paper about a risk assessment model designed to decipher data for military applications.  During the interview, Ye admitted that she held the rank of Lieutenant in the PLA and admitted she was a member of the CCP.

Zaosong Zheng

In August 2018, Zheng entered the United States on a J-1 visa and conducted cancer-cell research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston from Sept. 4, 2018, to Dec. 9, 2019. It is alleged that on Dec. 9, 2019, Zheng stole 21 vials of biological research and attempted to smuggle them out of the United States aboard a flight destined for China.  Federal officers at Logan Airport discovered the vials hidden in a sock inside one of Zheng’s bags, and not properly packaged.  It is alleged that initially, Zheng lied to officers about the contents of his luggage, but later admitted he had stolen the vials from a lab at Beth Israel.  Zheng stated that he intended to bring the vials to China to use them to conduct research in his own laboratory and publish the results under his own name.

The charge of making false, fictitious and fraudulent statements provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of visa fraud provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of acting as an agent of a foreign government provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of conspiracy provides for a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  The charge of smuggling goods from the United States provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000.  Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling; Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Boston Field Division Joseph R. Bonavolonta; Michael Denning, Director of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Boston Field Office; Leigh-Alistair Barzey, Special Agent in Charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Northeast Field Office; Philip Coyne, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; and William Higgins, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Export Enforcement, Boston Field Office made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorneys B. Stephanie Siegmann, Jason Casey and Benjamin Tolkoff of Lelling’s National Security Unit are prosecuting these cases with the assistance of trial attorneys William Mackie and David Aaron at the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.

The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

These case are part of the Department of Justice’s China Initiative, which reflects the strategic priority of countering Chinese national security threats and reinforces the President’s overall national security strategy. In addition to identifying and prosecuting those engaged in trade secret theft, hacking and economic espionage, the initiative will increase efforts to protect our critical infrastructure against external threats including foreign direct investment, supply chain threats and the foreign agents seeking to influence the American public and policymakers without proper registration.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRESS RELEASE

Let’s now take our previous dates and see where the most important date in the DOJ press release inserts:

  • ***09 Dec 19: Evidence of Chinese spies smuggling “vials of biological research” to Wuhan
  • 27 Dec 19: First report of COVID-19 in China
  • 19 Jan 20: First report of COVID-19 n US

From the same press release, let’s consider which agencies assisted (EMPHASIS MINE):

  • Assistant Attorney General for National Security
  • FBI Boston Field Division
  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection
  • Defense Criminal Investigative Service
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Office of Inspector General
  • U.S. Department of Commerce
  • Office of Export Enforcement
  • DOJ National Security Unit
  • National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section

Those are heavy-hitting agencies for “biological research;” in fact, those are the types of agencies you’d expect to see if perhaps someone were trying to smuggle a bio-engineered, weaponized and highly virulent strain of virus; perhaps a coronavirus, to Wuhan, China. That the timeline has been revised backwards to encompass this arrest date is concerning and perhaps telling.

In summary, the veneer level work here overlaying the body of work in the catalog of articles I’ve already written, assembles to suggest a converging timeline relevant to our hypothesis. We now have evidence that Harvard affiliated spies were working to export “vials of biological research” to Wuhan, China whereby those efforts preceded the first known documented case in Wuhan, as first reported; and encompassed or included within it, the first report as given in the revised timeline of 17 Nov 19.

There is no evidence in my possession to link this in ways beyond what I’ve demonstrated here. I do find it highly peculiar that QAnon would post this very press release on 07 Feb 20 in #3842 and that it ties directly to Wuhan, China; and for obvious reasons.

No matter, the continued examination of Harvard, China, Wuhan and “biological research” smuggling is a worthy one given the current state of affairs.

Beyond that, WAKE-UP AMERICA! COVID-19 is functioning like a new 9/11 to usher-in the ‘new normal.’

HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS:

Requisite disclaimer – this is now the 15th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remesdivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what appears above. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

SIGNIFICANT TIMELINE MARKER – HAS THE FIRST STONE FALLEN? QANON DROPS FROM 2017 CONFIRMED

21 Mar 20

We’ll waste no time and to start, I’ll tip my hat to a third-party for the heads-up on two fronts: the first 50 QAnon drops framing the broader 4-year timeline and the article sourced herein pertaining to events in Saudi Arabia. That new understanding has given new meaning to old drops. For context, you can refer to this ARTICLE speaking to the former (and you can refer to this CATALOG for all articles in the series.) As for the latter, let’s get to it and we’ll start with a concept, which is a sequence of events. That sequence starts with Saudi Arabia.

Here are two relevant Q drops that precisely outline the understood sequence:

#72 04 NOV 17

SA is the primary, US is secondary, (Asia/EU)…

#88 05 NOV 17

Ten days.
Darkness.
Scare tactics (MSM).
D’s falling.
R’s walk-away/removed.
SA –> US –> Asia –> EU

For the sake of brevity and since we’ve all been relegated to our households with an historic and unprecedented disproportionate response to a relatively mild illness that unfortunately killed several hundred Americans but falls exponentially short of even brushing up against the 15,000 that the flu kills annually, I’ll leave it at that as far as drops demonstrating the sequence. Those familiar with Q will acknowledge the redundancy of this sequence throughout. It’s understood that this sequence for eventual significant traction would begin with events unfolding first in Saudi Arabia and then the United States.

It’s also important to note that this information coincides with the previous round of Saudi arrests, as noted in the article cited below. Some will likely pick at that and cite relevance. I would argue that the given sequence isn’t limited to just the first round of Saudi arrests, but to the broader timeline. Moreover, it can’t be limited to just the first round of arrests if US traction is bound to it because US traction never happened. So although some may cite that, it actually works in favor of what I’m suggesting here. By that, I am saying that this second round of arrests becomes even more relevant as an antecedent indicator foreshadowing US arrests; especially given the current picture here domestically.

On a practical front, it would be tough to guarantee the second round of arrests on any form of a schedule unless the first round had already occurred and the foundation for the second round were fortified in place at that time. Ergo, including this sequence along with the Q drops pertaining to the first round of arrests makes sense logically; pragmatically. So, it’s reasonable to take the sequence at face value.

Translated in ONE SHOT – when then shit hits the fan in Saudi Arabia, the fan begins to wind up for a shit storm here. Are we all at home right now so that we don’t get shit on?

So, as we sit here, all safe and secure in the confines of our homes, consider this development as you ponder the plausibility of the political construct I’ve outlined for you in combination with QAnon’s drops; in combination with the globe being on the verge of a total lock-down (at least in the right places); in combination with your own curiosity as to when or if we’ll ever see mass arrests for corruption here in the United States:

Saudi Arabia: New Mass Corruption Arrests

Previous Campaign Marred by Lack of Due Process, Torture Allegations

On March 15, 2020, Saudi Arabia’s official government news agency announced the new arrests, stating that the Saudi state corruption watchdog had criminally investigated 674 state employees and ordered the detention of 298 for “financial and administrative corruption, consisting of bribery crimes, embezzlement and waste of public money, misuse of employment powers, and administrative misuse.” Among those detained are current and retired military officers, health officials, security officers under the Interior Ministry, and judges. The statement said that the acts of corruption amounted to 379 million Saudi Riyals ($101 million).

SOURCE

So there you have it. Does this tell us that it’s about ready to get very ugly for some and very glorious for many?

It sure looks like it does.

COVID-19: FAUCI, ONE HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION, THE RELEVANCE OF 13 JAN 17 AND EXAMINING THE FIRST 50 Q POSTS TO UNDERSTAND TODAY’S LANDSCAPE

21 Mar 20 (FOURTEENTH article in a series)

Does anyone else find the timing suspicious? The timing in the vector whereby a meaningful, very real and very palpable and global wave of political Populism reared it’s very angry and determined head only to find it swiftly and sharply severed by the sword of an enemy named COVID-19 coronavirus?

TIMING! It tells us so much.

Requisite disclaimer to beginthis is now the 14th article in a series on the COVID-19 coronavirus. All of this began with some curiosity about whom may stand to gain or benefit with the discovery of a promising treatment identified as Remdesivir – no more and no less; it’s that simple.

There was never an intent to write a single article; much less a series of them. The rabbit hole into which I placed myself diverged many times over transitioning into a mess of global entanglements that converted this work from an exploratory exercise to one hunting for evidence to scaffold an hypothesis. The content, therefore, is affected and takes a different tone and direction. For deeper understanding, here is the CATALOG of all articles in this series.

At this point, I’ve covered so much ground that attempting to recapitulate it to introduce each new article has become too cumbersome. Please refer back to the catalog for a deeper contextual backdrop to what follows. To save time, I would encourage you to start with the NINTH ARTICLE (it serves as a recapitulation of the first eight and launches the effort in another direction, which is where we are right now and which is seemingly in the midst of a global 9/11; assuming the fulcrum point of the truth continues to shift in favor of my suspicions relative to the evidence uncovered thus far.)

In articles TEN, ELEVEN, TWELVE and THIRTEEN, I outlined the insertion point for the pandemic political construct into the Trump administration by means of the compulsory transition meeting between the outgoing and incoming administrations on 13 Jan 17. This was the same day that the cooked-up Flynn/Russia revelations were made public and in a fashion so as to preempt the transition meeting in which Flynn participated. TIMING!

Immediately thereafter, Obama’s administration then had the audacity to disingenuously characterize the nature of that meeting as odd, tenuous, weird, distracted, peculiar, distanced, etc. Look at how the DSSG/MIC has utilized the “leak” mechanism to erode at Trump’s administration since day one. In this case, the leak mechanism is being leveraged to frame the pandemic construct vis-a-vis the Flynn/Russia leaks. The immediate criticism from Obama’s people courtesy of the MSM is indicative of the constructive aspect of it all. Everything they have done and continue to do reverts back to a set-up (Russia, Mueller, Ukraine, impeachment, etc.) Why would this be any different? It isn’t. I’m showing you the set-up for COVID-19 as a political construct and I’ll kick you back to the first 50 QAnon posts to really make you think long and hard about this. For now, though, let’s continue.

Article thirteen places the cross-hairs directly over Dr. Deborah Birx as the Obama-appointed, Globalist holdover being situated as one of the “experts” to which the President must defer during this global pandemic (construct!). The very nature of those details indicates that Birx is one of the chosen handlers to usher the President through the construct and ensure that the outcomes align with the Globalists’ objectives as the President is exposed to the construct’s dynamics. You see that play-out in the media every day vis-a-vis the White House’s briefings and the MSM’s actions within them.

It also left us (this series of articles) to deal Dr. Anthony Fauci – there are only so many hours in a day to read and write. I’ll make short work of Fauci and dispatch in short order.

In short, he’s another through-and-through Globalist. Period. His tenure began in 1984 under the administration of Ronald Reagan and he’s never left. In fact, when Hillary Rodham Clinton drew severe scrutiny for her unsteady campaign season and most notably as it relates to her obvious and significantly deteriorated health, it was Fauci whom sprinted to the forefront to praise then Secretary Clinton via Cheryl Mills; just as he sprinted to CNN to immediately contradict the President following a recent COVID-19 White House briefing. Here’s what Fauci offered for Hillary.

Do those sound like the words of a trustworthy and reliable Trump administration member? Nope. Not at all.

Moreover, consider (SOURCE),

Dr. Fauci was appointed Director of NIAID in 1984. He oversees an extensive research portfolio of basic and applied research to prevent, diagnose, and treat established infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, tuberculosis and malaria as well as emerging diseases such as Ebola and Zika. NIAID also supports research on transplantation and immune-related illnesses, including autoimmune disorders, asthma and allergies. The NIAID budget for fiscal year 2020 is an estimated $5.9 billion.

Dr. Fauci has advised six Presidents on HIV/AIDS and many other domestic and global health issues. He was one of the principal architects of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a program that has saved millions of lives throughout the developing world.

NIAID

HERE is Fauci’s NIAID resume if you care to read it.

There is also this to consider, which has been edited-in as you’ll note by the date,,

So the, either Birx and Fauci are handlers providing former President Obama and the broader network of Globalists a preeminent position of leadership in this global pandemic – by constructive design as I’ve outlined in great detail thus far – or it just happened to coincidentally shape-up this way. Before you decide, tell me what you make of this widely publicized on-camera interaction involving President Trump referring to the “Deep State Department” while Fauci buries his head in his hand.

You tell me – does this look like two folks on the same side or is this the President tipping his hand on live TV about the true nature of Fauci, Birx, Pompeo and the State Department. Watch:

Here’s were that leaves us: President Trump is being compelled to defer to experts; one of whom dates back to 1984 as a long-tenured swampy insider and the other is an Obama appointee; both of the having deep entanglements back to PEPFAR, HIV, funding, research, immense budgets and, of course, Bill Gates (if you’re lost, I refer you to the catalog of articles.) Here’s what I see: on 13 Jan 17 the political construct is inserted into Trump’s administration with Birx and Fauci lying in wait (recall, Trump wanted to dispatch Birx and was convinced not to do so by none other than Pence and his own daughter, Yvanka.) Once the outbreak is classified as a pandemic and affects things stateside, Birx and Fauci are now in a position to leverage the President’s constitutional powers; perhaps usurp them, and utilize that authority to align the outcomes with desired Globalist objectives.

Let me remind you. Right now you are being forced to stay home; not go to work; not go to school; and not go visit your grandparents yet you can buy a plane ticket and fly across the country at will. This doesn’t comport with common sense or logic. The flu kills 15,000 American a year. 101 Americans die every day in auto accidents. And we’re all locked down because fewer than 300 Americans are dead due to what equates to a bad cold or mild case of the flu?

One thing I continue to hammer home is this notion of a disproportionate response. That alone raises an enormous red flag. More on that as we continue.

Another enormous red flag that I raised early on in this series of articles hinges on the epidemiology behind the virus and its propensity for targeting seniors while leaving the young relatively unscathed (refer to the catalog of articles for deeper understanding.) I’m not alone here. Listen to how this doctor authoritatively summarizes what I have been delineating from the beginning. Watch with a hat tip to Shazlandia for sending this to me:

As the evidence continues to surmount, it’s difficult to consider the COVID-19 pandemic outside of the constructed vector.

So, let’s get to that one hypothetical question:

If you found yourself in a ballgame with life or death consequences hanging in the balance; and you were guaranteed to lose; and you were down by an unrecoverable score and with little to no time left on the clock; and the only way to keep from losing and thus preserve literally everything, were to cheat and interrupt the game, then what would you chose as your strategy for cheating whereby it must:

  • Wipe-out historic economic gains
  • Wipe-out historic stock market gains
  • Wipe-out historic job creation
  • Wipe-out historic employment for women
  • Wipe-out historic employment for blacks
  • Wipe-out historic employment for Hispanics
  • Wipe-out historic job opportunities for young people
  • Wipe-out your own record of, by means of eliminating any MSM or otherwise relevant coverage of, over three years of lying, cheating and stealing in the way of Russia, Mueller, Ukraine and impeachment
  • Prevent Americans from associating in the most important months of an election year (the very core of democracy, folks)
  • Sow discord and prevent normalcy associated with a solid economy and traditional American policies and priorities
  • Open a portal to allow the MSM to refuse to cover any intentionally aligning events found to be off-reservation; such as the DOJ’s dismissal of the hoax Russia bot case (SOURCE)
  • Open a portal to change all of society’s rules in the most important months of an election year now enmeshed in fear, panic and uncertainty (what causes people to shift their mindset [vote] – stability or [turn on your TV]?)
  • Open a portal for the extended MSM/political class to extend its attack on the president and in heightening fashion
  • Open a portal to herd the masses with fear and panic
  • Open a portal by mandating social isolation to exact a SIGNIFICANT AND DETRIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT on the populace so as to impact its collective mindset some 8 months prior to and heading into a presidential election; one with monumental consequences hanging in the balance
  • Open a portal to ban cash and move the globe onto a digital monetary system
  • Open a portal to thrust the UN or other similar body closer to a one-world government
  • Open a portal to further encroach on individual rights and liberties
  • Open a portal to further cast the shadow of authoritarian rule and Marxist ideology over the populace
  • Open a portal to further extend Globalist authority and oversight (constructs for power) in the spirit of global hegemony (US MIC/military serving as the “heavy” when needed)
  • Open a portal to further drape the cloak of draconian law, regulation, policy and control over the populace
  • Open a portal to force the President to defer to a Globalist Obama-appointed holdover “expert” in the oversight of this pandemic and as a mechanism to usurp and leverage his emergency authority as aligned with the Globalist ulterior and nefarious agenda
  • MOST IMPORTANTLY: open a portal whereby a former president and his Globalist comrades would have the capacity, by proxy (Birx, Fauci, et al.) to leverage and usurp the President’s constitutional emergency powers and authority and bring them in alignment with Globalist objectives as they usher-in their ‘new normal’
  • Others – this is an incomplete list.

That “MOST IMPORTANTLY” bullet point is the construct in its simplest form. That is what is happening as you are forced sit inside your home right now. The real question is WHY?

When you examine the list above, there is only one thing that would accomplish those and other unstated objectives; and with the least detrimental impact on the actual planet (read that as an alternative to thermonuclear options that align with the Globalist position on the planet and the environment.) A global pandemic virus is absolutely the best option. As I continue to reiterate over and over, the fluidity of such a construct allows nefarious actors to act with impunity and easily justify draconian measures to a terrified general public that has been herded up like sheep; using fear and panic as cattle dogs.

So, whereas some may see the COVID-19 pandemic as some form of a “white hat” function (for lack of a better term,) I can assure you that the evidence suggests otherwise. Rather, the more astute and sage observation is such that it’s more plausible than not for President Trump and his military advisers to have had in place a contingency plan for this very scenario, which they certainly anticipated occurring as predicated on irrefutable and reliable intelligence.

It’s imperative to understand how this could unfold and if you’re familiar with QAnon’s postings, you’ll find repeated references to it. In such a scenario, whereby foreknowledge is possessed, the most effective plan is to trap the Globalists inside of their own construct by closing-off all of the exit points and funneling them in only one direction: forward. This forces them into a binary position – confess or plow ahead – and we know that confessing isn’t a viable option for these people (neither is plowing ahead.) From that juncture and by leveraging its own malleable and adaptable contingency plan, Trump situates these miscreants whereby they are essentially forced to hang themselves with a rope they themselves braided. That’s what makes most sense and that’s what I gather from posts made by QAnon.

Before we move on to the first 50 Q posts as a roadmap to understanding the current landscape, remember this important but overlooked dynamic – the last time the Globalists reared their head in such overt fashion, they brought down three structures in broad daylight in Lower Manhattan, faked a plane crash in Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon with a cruise missile. They also killed 3,000 Americans on American soil and in one day.

That was all done with a Republican president in place. COVID-19 shares this identical circumstance for this very reason – you can’t herd the Right with a Leftist in charge. Look at the attempts from Obama over eight years and the push-back he always received as a result. For clarity here, just examine the microcosm of gun sales in relation to Obama’s threats to restrict Second Amendment rights. It’s the same dynamic. In order to herd the Right, a Republican must be in place. See 9/11. See COVID-19. Sidebar – in order to herd the left and no matter whom is in charge, all you have to do is hurt their feelings or the feelings of someone they perceive to be treated unfairly; especially in the context of the nauseating ‘social justice.’

On good information from a reliable source – the same source I’ve referenced in this series of articles – the first 50 QAnon posts contain the entirety of the broader timeline. This timeline is represented as being an accelerated one; calibrated to the 2020 election cycle; and thereby featuring an increasingly fast-closing window of opportunity to pull the proverbial thread to unravel the entire sweater. We’ll be skipping over a bunch relevant information in the posts to focus on the germane information.

Here’s what we can learn from QAnon as represented by extracts and full posts (RELEVANT COMMENTARY INCLUDED):

#5 29 OCT 17:

Follow the money, it’s the key. (IT’S DETAILED IN THE CATALOG OF ARTICLES. ADDITIONALLY, PEPFAR FUNDING [GATES, BIRX, FAUCI, OTHERS] OPENS A PORTAL TO FUNNEL PAYMENTS TO DSSG/MIC ASSETS [BIRX, FAUCI, OTHERS] FOR PRESENT AND FUTURE SERVICES RENDERED.)

Why did Soros transfer his bulk public funds to a NP? Note this doesn’t include massive slush funds that are pulled by several high ups.

The truth is mind blowing and cannot fully be exposed.
Also many are thinking from one point of view, US only, this evil is embedded globally. US is the first domino.
Have faith.
(ALL OF THIS INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION SETTING US ON THE RIGHT COURSE AND MUCH OF IT IS COVERED IN THE SERIES.)

#9 29 OCT 17:

Through the looking glass. (AS MANY SUSPECT, I BELIEVE THIS IS A REFERENCE TO LEWIS CARROLL’S WORK AND IT EXISTS TO COMMUNICATE IMPLICITLY THE FOLLOWING: THERE ARE TWO POLITICAL SYSTEMS, ONE OVERT [D.C. AS WE KNOW IT] AND ONE THAT UNDERPINS IT [THE SYSTEM OF CORRUPTION THAT TRUMP IS ATTEMPTING TO UNDO.] BY APPLYING WHAT WE LEARN IN THIS SUMMATION VIDEO, WE UNDERSTAND THAT THROUGH A MIRROR [PROJECTION – THE LEFT’S ACCUSATIONS REPRESENT THEIR OWN CRIMINALITY] ONE IS ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE NATURE OF THE OTHER SIDE [THE UNDERPINNING CORRUPT SYSTEM.] MOREOVER, ONE UNDERLYING AND SIGNIFICANT PREMISE IS THAT TIME FLOWS IN REVERSE. THE TIME FLOW ELEMENT WILL BE CRITICAL AS WE MOVE THROUGH THE NEXT DROPS.)

With the exception of post #2 whereby we see a date expression of ‘10.30.17,’ date expressions take a more traditional form like ‘Oct 30, 2017′ and ’10/30’; both from #1. In post #15, we see the first occurrence of dates being represented as ‘#.#’. In post #15, we see,

11.3 – Podesta indicted
11.6 – Huma indicted

I believe this change in date formats signals the beginning of “future proves past” information. More on that below.

#25 01 NOV 17:

Big picture stuff – few positions allow for this direct knowledge.

Proof to begin 11.3. (TAKE NOTE OF THE DATE FORMAT THAT AT FACE VALUE SUGGESTS NOVEMBER 3RD. MORE DISCUSSED BELOW. NOTE THE SENSITIVITY AND COMPARTMENTALIZATION INDICATED.)

#26 01 NOV 17:

Think about it logically.
The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker).
Biggest advanced drop on Pol.

(WE ARE BEING TOLD THAT TO TAKE NOTE OF THE FIRST MARKER – 11.3; NOTE THE DATE FORMAT. NOTE THE REFERENCE TO MILITARY.)

This brings us to the two most substantial posts providing possible understanding to where we find ourselves today – #34 and #35. Emphasis has been added to identify important aspects.

#34 01 NOV 71:

Q Clearance Patriot

My fellow Americans, over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country (the land of the free) from the evil tyrants that wish to do us harm and destroy the last remaining refuge of shining light. On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted. Public riots are being organized in serious numbers in an effort to prevent the arrest and capture of more senior public officials. On POTUS’ order, a state of temporary military control will be actioned and special ops carried out. False leaks have been made to retain several within the confines of the United States to prevent extradition and special operator necessity. Rest assured, the safety and well-being of every man, woman, and child of this country is being exhausted in full. However, the atmosphere within the country will unfortunately be divided as so many have fallen for the corrupt and evil narrative that has long been broadcast. We will be initiating the Emergency Broadcast System (EMS) during this time in an effort to provide a direct message (avoiding the fake news) to all citizens. Organizations and/or people that wish to do us harm during this time will be met with swift fury – certain laws have been pre-lifted to provide our great military the necessary authority to handle and conduct these operations (at home and abroad).

#35 01 NOV 17:

POTUS will be well insulated/protected on AF1 and abroad (specific locations classified) while these operations are conducted due to the nature of the entrenchment. It is time to take back our country and make America great again. Let us salute and pray for the brave men and women in uniform who will undertake this assignment to bring forth peace, unity, and return power to the people.

It is our hope that this message reaches enough people to make a meaningful impact. We cannot yet telegraph this message through normal methods for reasons I’m sure everyone here can understand. Follow the questions from the previous thread(s) and remain calm, the primary targets are within DC and remain at the top (on both sides). The spill over in the streets will be quickly shut down. Look for more false flags – stay alert, be vigilant, and above all, please pray.

“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. Love is patient, love is kind.”

God bless my fellow Americans.
4,10,20

(NOTE THAT TRUMP’S FUTURE PLACEMENT ON AF1 RELATIVE TO THE PANDEMIC SERVES AS A POSSIBLE EVENT MARKER FOR FUTURE LANDSCAPE-SHIFTING TRACTION. WE SHOULD MONITOR THE NEWS FOR THAT OCCURRENCE AS IT MAY SIGNAL WHAT IS TO COME. ALSO, NOTE THE NUMBER SEQUENCE AT THE VERY BOTTOM – 4, 10, 20.)

#40 02 NOV 17

4,10,20
A,b,c,d,e……

(SAME NUMBER SEQUENCE)

#533 14 JAN 18

4, 10, 20

Let’s bring it all together. First, I’ve woven the fabric outlining COVID-19 as a political construct with an insertion date of 13 Jan 17 (see the catalog.) Let’s bring the Q posts in for possible deeper understanding.

What we’ve all noticed since the very first QAnon drop – and I found it in real time on 28 Oct 17 – is the absolute fact that all of QAnon has been established as a military operation with Donald J. Trump serving as the obvious Commander in Chief. The military does things it’s own way and recording dates and times is no different. I for one, in my regular line of work, use the 24 hour clock (military time) to express time in written form. I also express the date in written form as day-month-year – you’ve seen this throughout all of my writings (just look at how I dated the Q drops above. This is how the military expresses dates. Should we expect the military to change how it expresses times and dates? No, we should not.

So, let’s take Q’s implicit instructions and by seeing things “through the looking glass” we can identify the criminality of the Left via political projection, which is a long-standing tactic of the Left as rooted in Alinsky principles. As we do that, we also learn that there is a parallel political system that underpins the one we know and it is flush with criminality and corruption. In order to understand all of that that and according to Carrol’s writings, time is represented in REVERSE; however that is to be interpreted. Here’s one way to interpret it.

We saw a distinct change in how Q is represented dates as delineated in post #15. The dates given in that post are:

  • 11.3
  • 11.6

What happens if we heed Q’s implicit instructions and view these dates as expressed in military form? With no year given, it looks like this:

  • 11.3> March 11th
  • 11.4> April 11th
  • 11.6> June 11th

Now what about the cryptic, “4, 10, 20,” which is represented either by ‘typo’ or by intent since the spaces in-between the numbers occur differently in different posts. Regardless, if you take that number sequence as a traditional expression of a date, it gets you April 10, 2020.

THANKS TO SHAZLANDIA FOR THIS TIMELY PHOTO

So, right now, there is substantial evidence of a political construct being in place and one that appears to have been inserted into President Trump’s administration on 13 Jan 17 during the Obama/Trump transition meeting. We’re currently sitting on today’s date of 21 Mar 20 and with the dates of March 11th, April 10th, April 11th and June 11th possibly having greater but not fully understood meaning; AND AT A TIME THAT THE GLOBE IS ON VIRTUAL LOCK-DOWN AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RELEGATED US TO ALL REMAIN AT HOME.

Conceding that some conflicting information exists, like the lack of ‘announcements’ thus far, revert back to #34 and #35 and see if you can make that cryptic information fit into a description of the landscape you see today. Then ask yourself if you’d like to know more about the dates of March 11th, April 10th, April 11th and June 11th, 2020; relative to the status quo.

No matter whether I’m right or wrong here, what is evident is that there is a manufactured global viral pandemic with a disproportionate response that has all of us under pseudo-medical martial law and with actual medical martial law sitting squarely on our doorstep.