The title says enough so let’s waste no time and get right to it. I can only say that it feels like something – no matter that be something benevolent, something life-altering or something evil; perhaps a combination of two of those things – is going down. It has to be. I know that with our “small team” here, that’s the consensus.

We continue to dig deep into COVID-19 and the entire QAnon fabric relative to others’ findings and dependable news in our effort to find meaning that points to a possible trajectory for all of us. Or, in other words, answers. We believe we are beginning to hit on indicators.

The last several COVID-19-specific articles diverged in a direction that brings Nancy Pelosi squarely to the forefront and establishes an unbelievable nexus between Wuhan, the WHO, the FBI, the coronavirus outbreak and FISA. One of the discovered intelligence reports pertaining to illegal the smuggling of bio-weapons out of the country (to and from China) was comprised of information collected under FISA authority. Does that present an overlap as it relates to the Trump umbrella being illegally targeted by FISA? Does it explain the reluctance of the DOJ and FBI to release still-sealed FISA documents and does it explain why the OIG recently criticized the FBI regarding its FISA abuses; all as previously reported?

Moreover and astonishingly, this intelligence report also put knowledge of the coronavirus outbreak into the hands of the FBI over two months BEFORE the Bill Gates/China funded and controlled WHO received it. Recall, it was Barack Obama who made the WHO the relative authority when he inserted the WHO into Trump’s administration in a viral pandemic scenario that I’ve contended represents the insertion point of a political construct.

Here are extracts from that presentation (SOURCE).

This might be the most direct evidence of the political construct I’ve hypothesized thus far and it comes from the architect of the construct himself on the circle-back:


First, realize this. With almost near certainty, internal polling likely informed the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton had no chance of winning the 2016 election in the months ahead. Heck, to know this all you had to do was look at the complete dearth of audience and following that she had at all of her campaign events and recalling that she essentially refused to hold any (Hillary napped through campaign season.) To the contrary, candidate Trump’s crowd sizes were akin to what we see today. Just like we know right now that the Democrats are dead in the water for 2020, it is virtually guaranteed that they knew they were dead in the water for 2016 when they passed this law on 18 Mar 16. So then, WHY did they pass it? That’s a rhetorical question.

As Politico notes, Public Law 114-136 is described anecdotally (EMPHASIS MINE),

The gathering was held to satisfy a requirement in a 2016 law that updated the procedures around presidential transitions to require, among other things, that the outgoing administration “prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.” Obama also mentioned it in a 2016 executive order laying out his transition goals.


WHY does an outgoing President in Obama feel compelled to cast his own self-imposed authority over an incoming Trump administration? WHY is Obama issuing an executive order to further frame the transition process when there already exists original and augmented legislation that has been revised and updated over time? Perhaps we should examine what that EXECUTIVE ORDER stated in order to understand this. Consider this extract (EMPHASIS MINE),

c) The White House Transition Coordinating Council shall:

(i) provide guidance to executive departments and agencies (agencies) and the Federal Transition Coordinator regarding preparations for the Presidential transition, including succession planning and preparation of briefing materials;

(ii) facilitate communication and information sharing between the transition representatives of eligible candidates and senior employees in agencies and the Executive Office of the President, including the provision of information relevant to facilitating the personnel aspects of a Presidential transition and such other information that, in the Council’s judgment, is useful and appropriate, as long as providing such information is not otherwise prohibited by law; and

(iii) prepare and host interagency emergency preparedness and response exercises.

Executive Order — Facilitation of a Presidential Transition – Barack Obama

Let’s identify the important components above as it relates to the possibility of a construct. Here, Obama is resting on and further decreeing by law a compulsory process for the incoming Trump administration that is rooted in planning and preparation contingencies. This is the establishment of pretext and the insertion of the actual construct to be leveraged further down the timeline. How do we know this? Because the criticism of the President takes this precise form – sown early and reaped on time. Here it’s being sown and circa 2016; after they know they’ve already lost the upcoming election, to be reaped at a time of their choosing, which is apparently now.

That gives you a glimpse of the backstory to all of this – the work is comprehensive so in the spirit of saving time, please see the linked catalog for deeper understanding.

Now, knowing what we do, let’s get back to Obama.

It seems then President Obama slipped the noose around incoming President Elect Trump’s neck on 13 Jan 17, which is the date of the Obama/Trump transition meetings where the construct was inserted as a pandemic scenario. Recall, these transition meetings are compulsory and and rightfully so; at least with fidelity to the task at hand.

Obama then came back on 31 Mar 20 to cinch it tight by calling out President Trump in front of the entire country for not heeding the advice that was so cleverly laid-out in that pandemic scenario he outlined on 13 Jan 17.

Oh, and by the way, General Flynn was also in those transition meetings and so was Joe Biden, today’s presumed nominee for the Democratic Party (not for long – his goose is cooked.) Recall that on that day (13 Jan 17) the MSM also conveniently decided to release (TIMING!) the cooked-up Flynn/Russia story, which broke before the meetings. Just more coincidences, probably. How many is that now? How mathematically impossible is that? Did you notice that like Birx, he hailed the younger generation? That’s not an accident.

Digressing and more importantly, why is that the FBI couldn’t do something with that information considering that we’re currently in the midst of a global coronavirus pandemic? Materially, any such coronavirus outbreak would ostensibly be of national security interest and within the FBI’s purview, so then what actions if any did they take? Was there no action because that by doing so the FBI would have risked compromising an ongoing FISA investigation? Was it any way germane to the Trump/FISA dynamic and if so, in what exact ways? Again, too many coincidences to merely dismiss.

Also important to note is Pelosi’s involvement and it’s relevance via her failed and fraudulent impeachment effort, which I outlined in an article entitled NANCY PELOSI’S OWN WORDS ARE ALL WE NEED TO DEMONSTRATE COVID-19 AS A POLITICAL CONSTRUCT AND HERE’S THE EVIDENCE. Consider,

Pelosi’s position as Speaker of the House makes her an ex officio member of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which is chaired by Adam Schiff, D-CA. Accordingly, “The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence oversees the nation’s intelligence agencies including components of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, State, Treasury and Energy” (SOURCE). With oversight authority comes access to intelligence briefings; including the sort the President would have received as reported below by the Washington Post. Clearly anything that could manifest as a global viral pandemic would have been front and center in such classified briefings; the likes to which Nancy Pelosi ought to have – did have – essentially unfettered access. (SOURCE)

Now think back to what I wrote in this article entitled, INCREDIBLE EMERGING STORY LINE IMPACTS COVID-19 THEORY: Links Wuhan, intelligence reports, bio-weapons, the WHO/Bill Gates, FBI and FISA all on the same timeline. Consider,

THIS IS SIGNIFICANT – Again, we’ve thoroughly documented the Gates/WHO/China relationship and this intelligence report now puts the FBI in front of the WHO on receipt of first notice and by more than 2 months. LET ME SAY THAT AGAIN – THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION KNEW OF THE CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK BEFORE THE W.H.O. DID AND BY OVER TWO MONTHS.

If the FBI knew, who else knew? What about Nancy Pelosi? Did she know? Did President Trump know? Those are all good questions to ask ourselves; especially since we know that an intelligence report specific to the coronavirus put the FBI in front of the WHO.

As we have documented, the first report of COVID-19 case in Wuhan, China was 27 Dec 19 but it was later revised back to 17 Nov 19. This would put the FBI’s knowledge of the outbreak back to roughly October 2019 based upon the first report because the decision to revise the outbreak data backwards was subsequent to it all.

All of this was outlined in an intelligence report to which, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was presumably privy as an ex officio member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and presumably sometime close to October of 2019. What was Nancy doing at that time? She was driving to get impeachment done before Christmas, which they did when the vote came down on 18 Dec 19. Why? Per our hypothesis, impeachment’s primary purpose was to throw cover to COVID-19. So they got impeachment squeezed in right in time – the ORIGINAL (recall the date was later revised backwards to 17 Nov 19) case emergence in Wuhan dates to 27 Dec 19.

Nancy, why was it so important to get impeachment done before Christmas – using Christmas as the cover for the rush job? – when you had no evidence of an impeachable crime and an incomplete case that would compel you to transmit wittingly weak Articles of Impeachment to the Senate? And then you decided to slam on the breaks and refuse to transmit the Articles to the Senate for over a month – WHY? It’s so…. amateurish and you’re what, 80? So, why?

It seems to us that she did so to throw cover to COVID-19. It’s the only thing that make sense.

WHO ELSE OUT THERE IS SAYING THAT THEY HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE INSANITY OF PELOSI’S IMPEACHMENT? Nobody. Just me/us as best I can tell. But consider what I wrote previously,

We have to give attention to some aspects that affect our lens in all of this. Our first item is rooted in the profoundly and astonishingly inadequate and incompetent performance of Nancy Pelosi in her failed and fraudulent impeachment of President Trump. Those are not exaggerations or embellishments. Even the most rudimentary scholar of civics understands that the US House of Representatives bears the sole constitutional onus to fully investigate and subsequently compile a complete case before transmitting the requisite Articles of Impeachment to the US Senate. That same scholar would also know that only the US Senate bears the sole constitutional onus of functioning as the court for the impeachment trial; understanding that investigatory aspects to any case are in no way a function of any court; rather such duties belong to law enforcement, prosecution, defense and, in this case, a designated federal body in the US House and the authority of its committees and their oversight responsibilities.

No one else has really put forward a valid explanation for all of that or am I wrong? We, with our work, can account for much of it. If you think the Globalists brought down buildings on 9/11, which they most certainly did, conspiring to release a seemingly mild (controversial topic with conflicting data points and unclear information) weaponized virus that leaves the young and healthy largely unaffected is merely child’s play; so long as you have the resources: see Gilead Sciences, Unitaid, George Soros, Pinbright, Bill Gates, China, the WHO and a host of others.

If you care to dig into those details, here’s the entire catalog of COVID-19 work HERE.

Here’s another development that now comes back to us full circle and with greater clarity. Now that we know the relevance of hydroxychloroquine to the broader landscape, the suspicious deaths of BARRY & HONEY SHERMAN take on a new light since their company APOTEX specifically manufactures the drug.

Look at the date of the murders 13 DEC 17 relative to the date of the construct insertion – 13 Jan 17. It’s 11 months later to the day. Here’s a broad assumption to make but we’ll do it hypothetically so we can make a point. The timeline tells us that the construct was inserted prior to the murders. If our assertions are right, that timing would create motive if Sherman’s stance on hydroxychloroquine was not congruent with certain others’ stance on it; meaning he and Apotex were in the way.

Who thinks then that perhaps it’s plausible that Mr. Sherman got off the reservation, so to speak, and was uncooperative with certain parties? I’d argue that Seth Rich also got off the reservation when he delivered the DNC’s emails to WikiLeaks. Look, I’m not saying this occurred this way rather I’m only pointing-out ANOTHER coincidence for your consideration. Before you make up your mind, Mr. Sherman was the child of Holocaust survivors and had many philanthropic endeavors making him a likely unwilling participant in something to the level of our assertions. (SOURCE.) Unfortunately, neither he, nor his wife; or Seth Rich, are here to tell us any differently.

BREAKING item before we get into it: With a hat tip to Shazlandia, we have reports of a new viral strain breaking-out in China. Click HERE for details.

Here are the Q drops from the ‘small team’ that we think may be relative to ongoing events. Before we get into them, this recent Q-related article HERE focuses specifically on drops related to China and in an effort to gain more perspective on COVID-19. Beware that it’s a longer article with a thorough dig but it’s there for context if you need it.

#521 / 13 JAN 18
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.9
We are at WAR [@].
Do you TRUST the US Military?
Do you TRUST the Chain Of Command?

In particular, not only does 521 converge with the timeline that overlays all of this, it’s ‘[SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT’ that we believe is relevant here. It reads as if it’s a “necessary” benevolent event and although we leave room for that, it’s more likely not; making the efforts of the President and his administration probably reflective of their contingency plan to an anticipated scenario. The contention is that the “event” is the pandemic itself or it is related to an event within the pandemic. Take note of the date of the post – 13 Jan 18, because we’ll talk about that.

#2217 / 13 JAN 18
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 72b088 No.3093430
Anonymous ID: b48522 No.3093289

Trudeau, ANYTHING?
Billionaire(s) 187.
Safety House Build.
U1 Funnel >> Canada >> X

Let’s talk about TIMING – one of my favorite tools in all of this. Look at how the the events converge; all occurring on the 13th. It’s odd, no?
13 Jan 17 – Obama/Trump transition meeting> pandemic construct inserted
13 Dec 17 – Shermans murdered> barrier to construct (11 month delta)
13 Jan 18 – [SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT. (1-year delta)
13 Jan 18 – Billionaire(s) 187.

The timing is uncanny. Everything occurred on the 13th; including Q’s drops, whereby we argue the current pandemic (scare event) is linked to the Sherman’s murders by means of the 187 reference in the drop (187 refers to homicide.)

Also notable and in certain ways supportive of our hypothesis, we have these posts below. They, too, share the same sentiment that SOMETHING FEELS LIKE IT’S HAPPENING. Notice the use of the President’s vernacular – “Phase 4” in this first post; it has meaning in the Q fabric.

*Click to open, expand and view additional Q drops relative to “phases.”

Here’s another example in the same direction.

Before we close, I’m going to provide you with this timeline from research in another ARTICLE. It could be helpful:

19 Mar: Lock-downs begin
24 Mar: DHS essential personnel moved to NORAD
28 Mar: Projected beginning date for virus peak
10 Apr: Projected worst day 1
11 Apr: Projected worst day 2
30 Apr: Extended ended date for federal guidelines
30 Apr: Projected end date for virus peak
23 May: Lock-downs begin to relax
06 Jun: Lock-downs end

Looking at that and as a sidebar, Virginia holds elections on 09 Jun 20 and “Governor Black Face” has them locked down until 10 Jun 20.

We’ll leave it at that for now. Our team is still hashing-out what we think is the most likely timeline beyond what we’ve already shared. Nonetheless, we all get the sense that something is about to happen.

For posterity’s sake, we’d all better be praying that it does.