WITH THE EXPECTED ACQUITTAL VOTE COMING WEDNESDAY, PREDICTIONS ABOUT THE POLITICAL STRATEGY ON THE LEFT GAIN CLARITY AND CONFIRMATION. HINT – YOU ALREADY KNOW THE DIRECTION.

There is one particular position I’ve stood firm on and will continue to stand firm on and Devin Nunes lined it out again last night. It is also perhaps the most important aspect of what we’ll discuss today and simply because it ties directly to three things: means, motive and opportunity. Each of those three elements are firmly in place for the Left and each helps to pave the way moving forward, which only goes in on direction from the Left’s point of origin. You already know that direction because we’ve been on it for over three years.

The position I’m standing firm on is simply this – “The President’s enemies will never stop until they are MADE to stop.” That line comes from THIS article, which I wrote back on 24 Jan 20 as a reflection of where impeachment stood in the broader picture and around the end of the House managers’ three days of arguments.

Here are Nunes’ comments (H/T CTH.)

After hearing Nunes’ poignant comments, it all goes back to what I said and the reason for why WE HAVE ALL BEEN HERE IN THIS SOCIAL MEDIA BASED ATMOSPHERE OF PUBLIC AND OPEN SOURCE RESEARCH; and why the President of the United States must align his constitutional authority with a legal and appropriate remedy to MAKE THEM STOP. Otherwise, the DSSG will have branded the insanity of the last three-plus years as the NEW NORMAL. Newsflash, we ain’t signing up for that and that’s why we’re all here in this digital space.

For context, I’ve laid out a considerable body of work supporting my position. Here’s that position “In 1 Shot” – the House transmitted intentionally weak Articles of Impeachment to the Senate as a critical component of their broader strategy; so as to transfer the SOLE constitutional investigatory onus from the House to the Senate; so as to create a portal for conflict based upon the Senate’s constructed need to call for additional witness testimony and evidence; which stands completely antithetical to what the US Constitution provides.

Think about it. Everything they’ve done thus far has been CONSTRUCTED in the absence of ACTUAL EVIDENCE FOR ACTUAL CRIMES, impeachable or otherwise. Everything is essentially framed in process crimes designed to trip-up the political target within the CONSTRUCT: Flynn lying to the FBI (fake), Trump Administration lying about Russian collusion (fake), Kavanaugh’s opponents’ position to keep him from being seated on SCOTUS (fake), meetings arranged by DSSG assets to compromise the Trump Umbrella (fake), Trump’s diplomatic relations with Ukraine (fake), and on and on and on. The current impeachment is a general formulation of the SAME CONSTRUCT. As I continue to say, once you get to know these miscreants, they’re quite predictable.

Being locked into the mode of creating a construct absent evidence of a real crime, the best avenue was dragging-out the process out with delays, obfuscation, etc. The best avenue to accomplish that objective was to transfer the constitutional investigatory onus from the House to the Senate, hence the intentionally weak articles. In order to do execute that extra-constitutional maneuver, Pelosi needed an impetus; a justification; a rationale to bridge the gap so as to transfer said onus. That’s exactly where Bolton and his fake transcript come in.

Bolton’s peculiar book transcript transmittance (remember, he violated protocol by not submitting a copy to White House counsel for executive privilege processing in addition to the one he submitted at the compromised NSC) to the NSC converged with Pelosi’s rush/delay/transmit tactics the AsOI. That converged of two separate events happens to precisely converge with a third timeline – the President’s impeachment. Bolton’s book transcript was constructed as a planned last minute effort to preempt the Senate trial and shift the landscape back into their favor. With the transcript in play, the Democrats would argue for extra-constitutional witnesses and evidence.

Luckily and in accordance to tradition, the Senate shot that down. Do you really think; however, that just because the President will be acquitted on Wednesday his opponents will stop? Hell no they won’t. All this Lawfare Group does is transition from one CONSTRUCT to the next and don’t forget that other remedies for them are still sidelined but locked and loaded: 25th AMENDMENT, 25TH AMENDMENT ENTANGLED WITH IRAN , ASSASSINATION and others.

So then, with post-impeachment acquittal on the immediate horizon and the most important election in perhaps the history of the United States about 9 months away, what options does the president have?

What about this option: selective DECLASSIFICATION (linked article provides further context)? What a bold and sage move this could be – President Trump emerging from the DSSG’s failed impeachment dumpster fire; standing tall above the ashes, and embolden and with an “S” emblazoned across his chest. His first move could be one of resoluteness by declassifying and making public any relevant classified material standing tall and shining bright in such a way to both exonerate him unequivocally while also destroying every last fiber of his culpable political enemies.

No matter, what remains as most important here are two entangled concepts that threaten the very nature of traditional America and the rights and freedoms American inherently possess: these people won’t stop until they are MADE to stop and the only person to do that is President Donald J. Trump.

For deeper understanding of the broader impeachment construct (teaser – one of these articles foreshadows QAnon’s known identity) you can reference these articles (article continues below with perhaps the oddest and most peculiar aspect of the Senate trial.)

11 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Backdrop on institutional preservation

18 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Comprehensive review of impeachment construct

18 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Major take-aways from Trump’s initial response

19 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Reminder about the MOU signed by House committee chairmen to agree to use their committee subpoena to attack the Trump Umbrella

24 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Assesses impeachment near the halfway point

25 JAN 20: ARTICLE: FIRST ARTICLE OUTLINING EMERGENCE OF LEFT’S IMPEACHMENT EXIT STRATEGY

25 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Trump defense’s opening arguments – video link

25 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Trump defense’s opening arguments – granular analysis

26 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Discusses press pool call transcript relative to intentionally weak Articles of Impeachment

26 JAN 20: ARTICLE: FIRST ARTICLE OUTLINING WHY PELOSI WAITED TO TRANSMIT AsOI TO THE SENATE (WAITING ON BOLTON TRANSCRIPT)

27 JAN 20: ARTICLE: FOLLOW-UP ARTICLE TO PELOSI/BOLTON TIMELINE

29 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Outlines how the impeachment trap is in place

29 JAN 20: ARTICLE: Impeachment trending toward acquittal

I’ll leave you with this, which I consider to be perhaps the most anomalous, odd and peculiar aspect of the impeachment Senate trial thus far; one I suggested on social media as perhaps being the beginning of the end for the Left and for this hypothetical reason. Does this not look like a message from somewhere behind the backdrop? One where Nadler preempts Schiff on closing arguments as a “pull the plug” moment suggestive of messaging indicating a strategy shift?

That’s what it looks like to me.

Odd and peculiar indeed.